Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Dynamic Routing and Wavelength Assignment with Power Consideration in WDM Networks Naohiro Sakiyama, Akira Nagata, Takahiro Matsuda, and Miki Yamamoto Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan Tel: +81-6-6879-7742, Fax: +81-6-6875-5901 E-mail: naohiro@post.comm.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp Abstract - One of the most important technical prob- lems in optical WDM network is the dynamic routing and wavelength assignment (dynamic RWA) problem, which is to set up lightpaths and assign wavelengths dynamically in order to establish a channel between optical source and des- tination nodes. Previous studies have solved many vari- ations of the dynamic RWA problem under the assump- tion of ideal conditions regarding the power of a signal, i.e. signal attenuation on a fiber and saturation of optical amplifier are not taken into account. In practical net- work environment, capability of connection establish- ment in RWA problem should be smaller than this ideal case. In this paper, we investigate the dynamic RWA prob- lem taking account of degradation of routed signals by opti- cal components, and propose a new routing algorithm with power consideration. The proposed algorithm can reduce forced termination probability of connections due to the above power constraints. With a computer simulation, we evaluate the proposed algorithm by comparing it with an existing routing algorithm. I. INTRODUCTION Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) technology is globally used to cope with rapidly increasing bandwidth demands in telecommunication networks [1]. An important problem in WDM networks is the routing and wavelength as- signment (RWA). The objective of the RWA problem involves selecting the best combination of a route (path) and a wave- length for each connection such that the number of connections established is maximized under the condition that any connec- tions sharing a common link does not use the same wavelength. The RWA problem is categorized into two groups, static RWA and dynamic RWA: depending upon whether the traffic demand is considered statically or dynamically [2]. In the static case, given a fixed demand matrix, where each entry specifies the number of lightpaths requested from one station to another, the objective is usually to satisfy the maximum number of re- quested lightpaths. In the dynamic case, connections are gen- erated and closed with some probability distribution and the objective is usually to minimize the required number of wave- lengths or fibers in the network. In this paper, we focus on the dynamic RWA problem. The dynamic RWA problem is important especially in IP over pho- tonic networks [3, 4]. The number of users connected to the IP networks has been increasing due to an explosive growth of the Internet services. Since IP traffic demand is highly variable, it is difficult to characterize the traffic profile beforehand. There- fore, in order to realize IP over WDM networks with tremen- dous capacity, setting up lightpaths should be solved by the dynamic RWA approach. Many previous studies have proposed solutions of dynamic RWA. In most of them, the optical network is modeled under the ideal assumption, i.e. signal attenuation on fiber not to be considered, and only the logical aspects of the problem are con- sidered. In these proposals, a connection between two stations, which traverses optical fiber links and encounters different de- vices, is assumed to maintain valid power levels on the entire path from source to destination [5]. When the signal attenua- tion is taken into account, the network design principle under the ideal condition cannot be applied. In this paper, we propose an effective routing algorithm with power consideration. The proposed algorithm provides the sta- ble communication by suppressing and avoiding the occurrence of saturation in the amplifier which causes the forced termi- nation of connections. The proposed algorithm is based on a fixed-alternate routing algorithm, which selects a route to be assigned from a limited number of fixed routes to each desti- nation node. The fixed-alternate routing has two procedures, making routing tables at each optical switch, and determin- ing an adequate route from the routing table. Our proposed algorithm takes account of the power constraint in both two procedures and makes it enable to construct effective optical networks in terms of network resource utilization and physical conditions. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. First, the prob- lem description of the dynamic RWA with power consideration will be presented. Next, a new dynamic RWA with power con- sideration will be proposed . Finally, the numerical results are discussed and the conclusions are given. II. DYNAMIC RWA WITH POWER CONSIDERATION A. Problem Description Many algorithms for the dynamic RWA problem have been proposed in order to utilize network resources effectively and maximize the number of lightpaths established. These stud- ies, however, are evaluated under the ideal conditions without physical constraints . In the optical network, signals on fiber is decayed. Amplification, whether inside the switching devices or on the fiber links, is needed to compensate for these power losses. A proper power level for the individual signal in the optical network must be maintained in such a way that the ag- gregate power on a fiber does not exceed a certain threshold. This is because saturation occurs when the total input power of the amplifier exceeds a given threshold. When saturation oc- curs, the amplifier cannot work at its full capacity, but rather its gain is a decreasing function of the aggregate power. It is also worth mentioning that one individual connection with a high signal power might saturate the amplifier and reduce the gain for other signals sharing the same amplifier [5]. When the gain of a connection is reduced and received power is under an ad- equate power level, this connection results in being terminated by force. The objective of the proposed routing algorithm is to find a route that avoids saturation. In order to do this, from the above discussion, it is required to minimize the total input power of optical amplifier by reducing the transmission power of a sta- tion. B. Proposed Algorithm Our proposed algorithm is based on fixed-alternate routing, which can reduce computational costs for updating routing tables as compared with other routing algorithms. In the fixed alternate routing, each node in the network is required to maintain a rout- ing table which contains an ordered list of some fixed routes to each destination node. A direct route between a source node s and a destination node d is defined as the first route in the list of routes to d in the routing table at s. Alternate routes between s and d are any route other than the first route in the list of routes to d in the routing table at s. The proposed algorithm is described as follows. When a connection request is generated, the source node attempts to find routes in sequence from the routing table, until a route with a valid wavelength assignment is found. If no available route is found from the routing table, the request is blocked and lost. When a saturation occurs on the direct route, even if a valid wavelength assignment is found, the connection request along the direct route is blocked and an alternate route is chosen. We anticipate that connections concentrate on the links which is frequently used with shortest path. Proposed routing algorithm allows to avoid saturation on that links. In this paper, a routing table is assumed to contain two routes for requested connection, a direct route and an alternate route. These routes between s and d are determined by a following procedure: 1: Set the shoretest route R1 from s to d for the directroute. 2: Compute (K− 1) routes Ri (2 ≤ i ≤ K) as candidate routes, where Ri represents the ith shortest route. 3: For Ri, 2 ≤ i ≤ K, compute the transmission powers pi,j (1 ≤ j ≤ Li) from each intermediate switch j on Ri . Li means the number of switches on Ri. Find the maximum transmission power Pimax = MAX(pi,j) 4: Find m such that Pmmax = MIN(Pimax) (2 ≤ i ≤ K), which means the minimal of the maximum transmission powers of all the candidate routes. 5: Select Rm as the alternate route In this paper, we assume K = 3, i.e an alternate route is selected from the second-shortest route and the third-shortest route. III. SIMULATION RESULTS In this section, we evaluate the performance of the proposed routing by a computer simulation. We compare the proposed routing with the fixed-alternate routing proposed in [6] which does not consider the power constraint. In the computer simulation, the network model in [5] with 21 switches and 114 unidirectional fiber links [5] (shown in figure 1) is used . In this network, every link is assumed to be capable of carrying 8 wavelengths. Amplifiers are placed on the links every 100km. We employ the same model of amplifier as in [5]. The gain available at an amplifier is given by the following function: G(Pin, SSG) = min{SSG, (Pmax − Pin)} where Pin is the total input power in dBm; Pmax is the max- imum amplifier output power in dBm, and SSG is the gain in dB, which is obtained when saturation is not occurred. We as- sume each switch is connected with an access node ni (1 ≤ i ≤ 21). Calls for node pair (ni, nj) (1 ≤ i, j ≤ 21, i 6= j) are generated according to a Poisson process with an arrival rate λ. The holding time for a call is exponentially distributed with an average holding time h and is independent of generation and holding times of other calls. The blocking probability and the forced termination proba- bility is used as performance metric. Blocking probability is defined as a probability that a connection cannot be established Figure 1: topology of the Italian network due to resource contention along the desired route. Forced ter- mination probability is defined as a probability that a connec- tion is terminated by force due to saturation which is brought by another new connection establishment. Figure 2 shows the blocking probabilities and forced termination probabilities vs traffic load ρ which is defined as ρ = λh. From this figure, we can see that the forced termination probability is drastically improved when using the proposed routing algorithm. This is because the proposed routing avoids occurrence of saturation along a direct route. Also we can see that the blocking probability of proposed routing is slightly higher than that of fixed-alternate routing. This is because the proposed routing, even if a valid wavelength assignment is found, blocks connection requests along the direct route when saturation occurred. In any communication system, we believe that it is more important to reduce the forced termination probability than the blocking probability because the forced termination has a more damaging effect on users. Therefore, the proposed algorithm can make it possible to provide high quality communication. IV. CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we have studied the dynamic RWA problem with power considerations in all-optical WDM networks and pro- posed a routing algorithm that suppresses and avoids the oc- currence of saturation. To evaluate the performance, we com- pared the proposed routing with the fixed-alternate routing by simulation results. It has been shown that the proposed routing Figure 2: blocking probability and forced termination probability versus load algorithm significantly reduces the forced termination proba- bility. Power constraints that we have assumed in this paper can be more often occurred in the situation that traffic load is heavy rather than light. Therefore, the proposal is important es- pecially in the next generation Internet that the traffic volume will explosively increase. REFERENCES [1] B. Mukherjee, Optical Communication Networks, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997. [2] H. Zang, J. P. Jue, L. Sahasrabuddhe, R. Ramamurthy, B. Mukherjee, “Dynamic Lightpath Establishment in Wavelength Routed WDM Networks,” IEEE Communication Magazine, Vol.39 No.9, pp.100-107, Sep. 2001. [3] J. Spath, “Dynamic routing and resource allocation in WDM transport networks,” Computer Networks 32 (2000), pp. 519-538. [4] N. Ghani, S. Dixit, T. Wang, “On IP-over-WDM Integration,” IEEE Communication Magazine, Vol.38, No.3, pp.72-84, Mar. 2000. [5] M.Ali, B. Ramamurthy, J. S. Deogun, “ Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA) with Power Considerations in All-Optical Wavelength-Routed Networks, ” Proc., IEEE GLOBECOM ’99 pp.1437-43, Dec. 1999. [6] S. Ramaurthy and B. Mukhrjee, “Fixed-Alternate Routing and Wavelength Conversion in Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks,” Proc., IEEE GLOBECOM ’98, Vol.4, pp.2295-2302, Nov.1998.
Compartilhar