278500-Apresentações
287 pág.

278500-Apresentações


DisciplinaArquitetura e Organização de Computadores 1269 materiais4.364 seguidores
Pré-visualização17 páginas
Next instruction is at Label if $t4 °
$t5
beq $t4,$t5,Label Next instruction is at Label if $t4 = $t5
j Label Next instruction is at Label 
\u2022 Formats:
\u2022 Addresses are not 32 bits 
\u2014 How do we handle this with load and store instructions?
op rs rt 16 bit address
op 26 bit address
I
J
Addresses in Branches and Jumps
46\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
\u2022 Instructions:
bne $t4,$t5,Label Next instruction is at Label if $t4\u2260$t5
beq $t4,$t5,Label Next instruction is at Label if $t4=$t5
\u2022 Formats:
\u2022 Could specify a register (like lw and sw) and add it to address
\u2013 use Instruction Address Register (PC = program counter)
\u2013 most branches are local (principle of locality)
\u2022 Jump instructions just use high order bits of PC 
\u2013 address boundaries of 256 MB
op rs rt 16 bit addressI
Addresses in Branches
47\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
To summarize:
MIPS operands
Name Example Comments
$s0-$s7, $t0-$t9, $zero, Fast locations for data. In MIPS, data must be in registers to perform 
32 registers $a0-$a3, $v0-$v1, $gp, arithmetic. MIPS register $zero always equals 0. Register $at is 
$fp, $sp, $ra, $at reserved for the assembler to handle large constants.
Memory[0], Accessed only by data transfer instructions. MIPS uses byte addresses, so
230 memory Memory[4], ..., sequential words differ by 4. Memory holds data structures, such as arrays,
words Memory[4294967292] and spilled registers, such as those saved on procedure calls.
MIPS assembly language
Category Instruction Example Meaning Comments
add add $s1, $s2, $s3 $s1 = $s2 + $s3 Three operands; data in registers
Arithmetic subtract sub $s1, $s2, $s3 $s1 = $s2 - $s3 Three operands; data in registers
add immediate addi $s1, $s2, 100 $s1 = $s2 + 100 Used to add constants
load word lw $s1, 100($s2) $s1 = Memory[$s2 + 100] Word from memory to register
store word sw $s1, 100($s2) Memory[$s2 + 100] = $s1 Word from register to memory
Data transfer load byte lb $s1, 100($s2) $s1 = Memory[$s2 + 100] Byte from memory to register
store byte sb $s1, 100($s2) Memory[$s2 + 100] = $s1 Byte from register to memory
load upper immediate lui $s1, 100 $s1 = 100 * 216 Loads constant in upper 16 bits
branch on equal beq $s1, $s2, 25 if ($s1 == $s2) go to 
PC + 4 + 100
Equal test; PC-relative branch
Conditional
branch on not equal bne $s1, $s2, 25 if ($s1 != $s2) go to 
PC + 4 + 100
Not equal test; PC-relative
branch set on less than slt $s1, $s2, $s3 if ($s2 < $s3) $s1 = 1; 
else $s1 = 0
Compare less than; for beq, bne
set less than 
immediate
slti $s1, $s2, 100 if ($s2 < 100) $s1 = 1; 
else $s1 = 0
Compare less than constant
jump j 2500 go to 10000 Jump to target address
Uncondi- jump register jr $ra go to $ra For switch, procedure return
tional jump jump and link jal 2500 $ra = PC + 4; go to 10000 For procedure call
48\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
Byte Halfword Word
Registers
Memory
Memory
Word
Memory
Word
Register
Register
1. Immediate addressing
2. Register addressing
3. Base addressing
4. PC-relative addressing
5. Pseudodirect addressing
op rs rt
op rs rt
op rs rt
op
op
rs rt
Address
Address
Address
rd . . . funct
Immediate
PC
PC
+
+
49\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
Passos para criar um programa
C program
Compiler
Assembly language program
Assembler
Object: Machine language module Object: Library routine (machine language)
Linker
Loader
Memory
Executable: Machine language program
50\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
Exemplos de código
\u2022 if
\u2022 switch
\u2022 while
\u2022 for
51\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
\u2022 Design alternative:
\u2013 provide more powerful operations
\u2013 goal is to reduce number of instructions executed
\u2013 danger is a slower cycle time and/or a higher CPI
\u2022 Let\u2019s look (briefly) at IA-32
Alternative Architectures
\u2013\u201cThe path toward operation complexity is thus fraught with peril.
To avoid these problems, designers have moved toward simpler 
instructions\u201d
52\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
IA - 32
\u2022 1978: The Intel 8086 is announced (16 bit architecture)
\u2022 1980: The 8087 floating point coprocessor is added
\u2022 1982: The 80286 increases address space to 24 bits, +instructions
\u2022 1985: The 80386 extends to 32 bits, new addressing modes
\u2022 1989-1995: The 80486, Pentium, Pentium Pro add a few instructions
(mostly designed for higher performance)
\u2022 1997: 57 new \u201cMMX\u201d instructions are added, Pentium II
\u2022 1999: The Pentium III added another 70 instructions (SSE)
\u2022 2001: Another 144 instructions (SSE2)
\u2022 2003: AMD extends the architecture to increase address space to 64 bits,
widens all registers to 64 bits and other changes (AMD64)
\u2022 2004: Intel capitulates and embraces AMD64 (calls it EM64T) and adds
more media extensions
\u2022 \u201cThis history illustrates the impact of the \u201cgolden handcuffs\u201d of compatibility
\u201cadding new features as someone might add clothing to a packed bag\u201d
\u201can architecture that is difficult to explain and impossible to love\u201d
53\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
IA-32 Overview
\u2022 Complexity:
\u2013 Instructions from 1 to 17 bytes long
\u2013 one operand must act as both a source and destination
\u2013 one operand can come from memory
\u2013 complex addressing modes
e.g., \u201cbase or scaled index with 8 or 32 bit displacement\u201d
\u2022 Saving grace:
\u2013 the most frequently used instructions are not too difficult to 
build
\u2013 compilers avoid the portions of the architecture that are slow
\u201cwhat the 80x86 lacks in style is made up in quantity, 
making it beautiful from the right perspective\u201d
54\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
IA-32 Registers and Data Addressing
\u2022 Registers in the 32-bit subset that originated with 80386
GPR 0
GPR 1
GPR 2
GPR 3
GPR 4
GPR 5
GPR 6
GPR 7
Code segment pointer
Stack segment pointer (top of stack)
Data segment pointer 0
Data segment pointer 1
Data segment pointer 2
Data segment pointer 3
Instruction pointer (PC)
Condition codes
Use
031
Name
EAX
ECX
EDX
EBX
ESP
EBP
ESI
EDI
CS
SS
DS
ES
FS
GS
EIP
EFLAGS
55\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
IA-32 Register Restrictions
\u2022 Registers are not \u201cgeneral purpose\u201d \u2013 note the restrictions below
56\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
IA-32 Typical Instructions
\u2022 Four major types of integer instructions:
\u2013 Data movement including move, push, pop
\u2013 Arithmetic and logical (destination register or memory)
\u2013 Control flow (use of condition codes / flags )
\u2013 String instructions, including string move and string compare
57\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
IA-32 instruction Formats
\u2022 Typical formats: (notice the different lengths)
a. JE EIP + displacement
b. CALL
c. MOV EBX, [EDI + 45]
d. PUSH ESI
e. ADD EAX, #6765
f. TEST EDX, #42
ImmediatePostbyteTEST
ADD
PUSH
MOV
CALL
JE
w
w ImmediateReg
Reg
wd Displacementr/mPostbyte
Offset
DisplacementCondi-
tion
4 4 8
8 32
6 81 1 8
5 3
4 323 1
7 321 8
58\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
\u2022 Instruction complexity is only one variable
\u2013 lower instruction count vs. higher CPI / lower clock rate
\u2022 Design Principles:
\u2013 simplicity favors regularity
\u2013 smaller is faster
\u2013 good design demands compromise
\u2013 make the common case fast
\u2022 Instruction set architecture
\u2013 a very important abstraction indeed!
Summary
59\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
Chapter Three
60\uf6d92004 Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
\u2022 Bits are just bits (no inherent meaning)
\u2014 conventions define relationship between bits and numbers
\u2022 Binary numbers (base 2)
0000 0001 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110 0111 1000 1001...
decimal: 0...2n-1
\u2022 Of course it