Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Centennial Edition Wood Handbook Wood as an Engineering Material United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 Centennial Edition Wood Handbook Wood as an Engineering Material Forest Products Laboratory • United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service • Madison, Wisconsin April 2010 Forest Products Laboratory. 2010. Wood handbook—Wood as an engineer- ing material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 508 p. A limited number of free copies of this publication are available to the public from the Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53726–2398. This publication is also available online at www.fpl.fs.fed.us. Laboratory publications are sent to hundreds of libraries in the United States and elsewhere. The Forest Products Laboratory is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) of any product or service. The USDA prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orienta- tion, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program informa- tion (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimi- nation, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250–9410, or call (800) 795–3272 (voice) or (202) 720–6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Abstract Summarizes information on wood as an engineering mate- rial. Presents properties of wood and wood-based products of particular concern to the architect and engineer. Includes discussion of designing with wood and wood-based prod- ucts along with some pertinent uses. Keywords: wood structure, physical properties (wood), mechanical properties (wood), lumber, wood-based com- posites, plywood, panel products, design, fastenings, wood moisture, drying, gluing, fire resistance, finishing, decay, preservation, wood-based products, heat sterilization, sus- tainable use Pesticide Precautionary Statement This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. Caution: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife, if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers. iii Chapter 6 Commercial Lumber, Round Timbers, and Ties Hardwood Lumber 6–2 Softwood Lumber 6–6 Purchase of Lumber 6–12 Round Timbers and Ties 6–18 Commonly Used Lumber, Round Timber, and Tie Abbreviations 6–23 References 6–25 Chapter 7 Stress Grades and Design Prop- erties for Lumber, Round Timber, and Ties Lumber 7–1 Round Timbers and Ties 7–13 Literature Cited 7–14 Additional References 7–15 Chapter 8 Fastenings Nails 8–1 Spikes 8–9 Staples 8–9 Drift Bolts 8–10 Wood Screws 8–10 Lag Screws 8–12 Bolts 8–14 Connector Joints 8–19 Metal Plate Connectors 8–25 Joist Hangers 8–25 Fastener Head Embedment 8–26 Literature Cited 8–27 Additional References 8–27 Chapter 9 Structural Analysis Equations Deformation Equations 9–1 Stress Equations 9–4 Stability Equations 9–7 Literature Cited 9–10 Additional References 9–10 Chapter 10 Adhesives with Wood Materials Bond Formation and Performance Surface Properties of Wood for Bonding 10–2 Physical Properties of Wood for Bonding 10–5 Adhesives 10–8 Bonding Process 10–14 Bonded Joints 10–18 Testing and Performance 10–19 Standards 10–22 References 10–23 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Wood as a Sustainable Building Material Wood as a Green Building Material 1–1 Forest Certification Programs 1–3 Literature Cited 1–5 Chapter 2 Characteristics and Availability of Commercially Important Woods Timber Resources and Uses 2–2 Species Descriptions 2–3 Imported Woods 2–18 Scientific Name Index 2–41 Literature Cited 2–45 Additional References 2–45 Chapter 3 Structure and Function of Wood Biological Structure of Wood at Decreasing Scales 3–2 Microscopic Structure of Softwoods and Hardwoods 3–9 Wood Technology 3–12 Juvenile Wood and Reaction Wood 3–13 Appearance of Wood as Sawn Lumber 3–13 Wood Identification 3–16 Literature Cited 3–16 Chapter 4 Moisture Relations and Physical Properties of Wood Wood–Moisture Relationships 4–1 Thermal Properties 4–10 Electrical Properties 4–15 Friction Properties 4–17 Nuclear Radiation Properties 4–17 Literature Cited 4–18 Additional Reference 4–19 Chapter 5 Mechanical Properties of Wood Orthotropic Nature of Wood 5–1 Elastic Properties 5–2 Strength Properties 5–3 Vibration Properties 5–17 Mechanical Properties of Clear Straight-Grained Wood 5–21 Natural Characteristics Affecting Mechanical Properties 5–26 Literature Cited 5–44 Additional References 5–44 iv Chapter 11 Wood-Based Composite Ma- terials Panel Products, Glued-Laminated Timber, Structural Composite Lumber, and Wood–Nonwood Composite Materials Scope 11–2 Conventional Wood-Based Composite Panels 11–2 Glulam Timber 11–17 Structural Composite Lumber 11–20 Wood–Nonwood Composite Materials 11–22 Literature Cited 11–26 Chapter 12 Mechanical Properties of Wood-Based Composite Materials Elastic Properties 12–2 Strength Properties 12–3 Panel Products 12–3 Timber Elements/Structural Composite Lumber 12–5 Wood–Nonwood Composites 12–7 Testing Standards 12–9 Literature Cited 12–10 Chapter 13 Drying and Control of Moisture Content and Dimensional Changes Determination of Moisture Content 13–1 Recommended Moisture Content 13–3 Drying of Wood 13–5 Moisture Control during Transit and Storage 13–13 Dimensional Changes in Wood 13–15 Design Factors Affecting Dimensional Change 13–17 Wood Care and Installation during Construction 13–18 Literature Cited 13–19 Chapter 14 Biodeterioration of Wood Fungus Damage and Control 14–1 Bacteria 14–9 Insect Damage and Control 14–9 Marine Borer Damage and Control 14–13 References 14–15 Chapter 15 Wood Preservation Wood Preservatives 15–1 Selecting Preservatives 15–13 Evaluating New Preservatives 15–13 Preservative Effectiveness 15–13 Effect of Species on Penetration 15–15 Preparation of Wood for Treatment 15–15 Application of Preservatives 15–18 QualityAssurance for Treated Wood 15–25 Effects on the Environment 15–26 Recycling and Disposal of Treated Wood 15–26 References 15–27 Chapter 16 Finishing of Wood Factors Affecting Finish Performance 16–2 Exterior Wood Finishes 16–16 Application of Finishes, Special Uses 16–24 Finish Failure or Discoloration 16–25 Finishing Interior Wood 16–32 Wood Cleaners and Brighteners 16–34 Paint Strippers 16–35 Lead-Based Paint 16–36 Literature Cited 16–37 Additional References 16–37 Chapter 17 Use of Wood in Buildings and Bridges Light-Frame Buildings 17–1 Post-Frame and Pole Buildings 17–4 Log Buildings 17–6 Heavy Timber Buildings 17–6 Considerations for Wood Buildings 17–9 Literature Cited 17–12 Chapter 18 Fire Safety of Wood Construction Fire Safety Design and Evaluation 18–1 Fire-Performance Characteristics of Wood 18–8 Fire-Retardant-Treated Wood 18–15 Literature Cited 18–18 Additional References 18–18 Chapter 19 Specialty Treatments Plasticizing Wood 19–1 Modified Woods 19–4 Paper-Based Plastic Laminates 19–12 References 19–14 Chapter 20 Heat Sterilization of Wood Heat Treatment Standards 20–1 Factors Affecting Heating Times 20–2 Methods for Estimating Heating Times 20–5 American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC) Enforcement Regulations 20–9 Quality Mark 20–11 Other Considerations 20–11 Literature Cited 20–13 Glossary Index v FOREWORD We are proud to present this edition of the Wood Handbook—Wood as an Engineering Material, pre- pared and updated to include fascinating new develop- ments in the field of wood utilization and released as part of the celebration of the Forest Products Labora- tory’s first 100 years of service to the public. Efficient use of our nation’s timber is of critical impor- tance. This handbook is intended to serve as a primary reference on the use of wood in a variety of applica- tions—from general construction to use of wood for decorative purposes. It provides engineers, architects, and others who use wood with a source of information on the various properties of wood, its relationship with moisture, and characteristics of various wood-based materials. Continuing research holds promise for wider and more efficient utilization of wood in an increasing number of applications. This handbook was prepared by the Forest Products Laboratory (FPL), a research unit within the USDA Forest Service. The FPL, first established in 1910 in Madison, Wisconsin, was the first institution in the world to conduct general research on wood and its utilization. The information that resulted from many of its scientific investigations of wood and wood prod- ucts over the past century is the primary basis for this handbook. The Wood Handbook was first issued in 1935, and slightly revised in 1939, as an unnumbered publica- tion. Further revisions in 1955, 1974, and 1987 were published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as Agriculture Handbook No. 72. The 1999 revision was published by the FPL as General Technical Report FPL–GTR–113 and reprinted for broader distribution by the Forest Products Society. The audience for the Wood Handbook is broad. Con- sequently, the coverage of each chapter is aimed at providing a general discussion of the topic, with refer- ences included for additional information. Thousands more publications are available on the FPL website (www.fpl.fs.fed.us). Wood resources continue to play an important role in the world, from packaging materials to buildings to transportation structures. Wood has been useful to human societies for thousands of years; archeologi- cal discoveries have shown wood was used by ancient civilizations as a construction material, as a substrate for ornate decorative objects, and for providing the final resting place for royalty. These discoveries highlight the unique, long-lasting performance char- acteristics of wood, as many of these artifacts have survived for thousands of years. FPL continues on its journey of discovery and public service; working with cooperators from around the world, we are discovering information that covers the entire spectrum of wood science—from the use of wood in ancient societies to developing new theories that describe the fundamen- tal structure of wood based on the emerging field of nanoscience. If our forests are managed wisely, and if we continue to build our intellectual capacity to meet the challenges of evolving human needs and chang- ing wood characteristics, this amazing material that is wood will serve the public well for years to come. Christopher D. Risbrudt, Director Michael A. Ritter, Assistant Director Theodore H. Wegner, Assistant Director USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory vii PREFACE This edition of the Wood Handbook—Wood as an Engineering Material builds upon past editions, in particular the 1999 version, with some important addi- tions and modifications: • A chapter has been added that highlights the im- portance of wood as an environmentally respon- sible, sustainable material (Chapter 1). • Low-magnification micrographs of cross sections of commercial wood species have been added (Chapter 2). • An extensive discussion on the microscopic struc- ture of wood and its foundational elements are presented (Chapter 3). • Reference to the most recent research on proper- ties of the wood cell wall, at the nanoscale, has been included (Chapter 5). • To address the need to find uses for wood obtained from trees killed by invasive insect species as they propagate through various regions of the United States, a chapter has been added on heat-treating and sterilization procedures for wood products (Chapter 20). • Important updates are included on wood–mois- ture interactions and wood preservation practices (Chapters 4 and 15). The Wood Handbook originally focused on construc- tion practices that utilized solid-sawn wood. Since its first printing, the state-of-the-art in wood construc- tion practices and the range of wood-based products available to the consumer have changed considerably. Excellent printed reference and websites have been developed by various trade associations and wood products manufacturers that document, in detail, cur- rent design information for the ever-changing range of products available. We have made a concerted effort to include the most current references, in addition to many historic ones, to help guide the reader to appro- priate sources of information. This 2010 edition was reviewed by numerous individ- uals from industry, academia, and government. Several dozen industry, university, and government colleagues reviewed various sections and chapters of this edition during various stages of revision. We gratefully ac- knowledge their contributions. The following individuals provided in-depth technical reviews of this edition in its entirety: Donald Bender (Washington State University), David Green (USDA Forest Products Laboratory, retired), John Erickson (USDA Forest Products Laboratory, retired), Howard Rosen (USDA Forest Service, retired), World Nieh (USDA Forest Service), Robert White (USDA Forest Products Laboratory), and staff of the American Wood Council, American Forest & Paper Association. We gratefully acknowledge their contributions. Although listing every technical author and contributor to the Wood Handbook would be nearly impossible— early editions did not even list individual contributors by name—we do acknowledge the authors of previous editions; they all made significant, noteworthy contri- butions.Finally, we thank our many research cooperators from industry, academia, and other government agencies. By working with you we are able to continue develop- ing the technical base for using wood, wood-based materials, and wood structural systems in a technically sound manner. Robert J. Ross, Editor USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory CHAPTER 1 Wood as a Sustainable Building Material Robert H. Falk, Research General Engineer 1–1 Few building materials possess the environmental benefits of wood. It is not only our most widely used building mate- rial but also one with characteristics that make it suitable for a wide range of applications. As described in the many chapters of this handbook, efficient, durable, and useful wood products produced from trees can range from a mini- mally processed log at a log-home building site to a highly processed and highly engineered wood composite manufac- tured in a large production facility. As with any resource, we want to ensure that our raw ma- terials are produced and used in a sustainable fashion. One of the greatest attributes of wood is that it is a renewable resource. If sustainable forest management and harvesting practices are followed, our wood resource will be available indefinitely. Wood as a Green Building Material Over the past decade, the concept of green building1 has become more mainstream and the public is becoming aware of the potential environmental benefits of this alternative to conventional construction. Much of the focus of green building is on reducing a building’s energy consumption (such as better insulation, more efficient appliances and heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems) and reducing negative human health impacts (such as con- trolled ventilation and humidity to reduce mold growth). However, choosing building materials that exhibit positive environmental attributes is also a major area of focus. Wood has many positive characteristics, including low embodied energy, low carbon impact, and sustainability. These charac- teristics are important because in the United States, a little more than half the wood harvested in the forest ends up as building material used in construction. Embodied Energy Embodied energy refers to the quantity of energy required to harvest, mine, manufacture, and transport to the point of use a material or product. Wood, a material that requires a mini- mal amount of energy-based processing, has a low level 1Green building is defined as the practice of increasing the effi- ciency with which buildings use resources while reducing building impacts on human health and the environment—through better siting, design, material selection, construction, operation, mainte- nance, and removal—over the complete building life cycle. Contents Wood as a Green Building Material 1–1 Embodied Energy 1–1 Carbon Impact 1–2 Sustainability 1–3 Forest Certification Programs 1–3 Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) 1–4 Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) 1–4 American Tree Farm System (ATFS) 1–4 Canadian Standards Association (CSA) 1–5 Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) Schemes 1–5 Additional Information 1–5 Literature Cited 1–5 1–2 Their calculations show that the energy consumed in the manufacture of building materials (mining iron and coal for steel or harvesting wood for lumber) and the construction of a steel-framed house in Minneapolis is 17% greater than for a wood-framed house (Lippke and others 2004). The difference is even more dramatic if one considers the use of bioenergy in the manufacture of wood products. By this comparison, the steel-framed house uses 281% more non- bioenergy than the wood-framed house (Perez-Garcia and others 2005). Global warming potential, air emission index, and water emission index are all higher for steel construc- tion than for wood construction (Table 1–2). These analyses indicate that the amount of energy necessary to produce wood products is much less than comparable products made from other materials. If wood is substituted for these other materials (assuming similar durability allows equal substitution), energy is saved and emissions avoided each time wood is used, giving it a distinct environmental advantage over these other materials (Bowyer and others 2008). Carbon Impact The role of carbon in global climate change and its projected negative impact on ecosystem sustainability and the general health of our planet have never been more elevated in the public’s consciousness. Forests play a major role in the Earth’s carbon cycle. The biomass contained in our forests and other green vegeta- tion affects the carbon cycle by removing carbon from the atmosphere through the photosynthesis process. This pro- cess converts carbon dioxide and water into sugars for tree growth and releases oxygen into the atmosphere: energy (sunlight) + 6H2O + 6CO2 C6H12O6 + 6O2 A substantial amount of carbon can be sequestered in forest trees, forest litter, and forest soils. Approximately 26 billion metric tonnes of carbon is sequestered within standing trees, forest litter, and other woody debris in domestic forests, and another 28.7 billion tonnes in forest soils (Birdsey and Lewis 2002). According to Negra and others (2008), be- tween 1995 and 2005 the rate of carbon sequestration in U.S. forests was about 150 million tonnes annually (not in- cluding soils), a quantity of carbon equivalent to about 10% of total carbon emissions nationally. Unfortunately, deforestation in tropical areas of the world is responsible for the release of stored carbon, and these for- ests are net contributors of carbon to the atmosphere. Tropi- cal deforestation is responsible for an estimated 20% of total human-caused carbon dioxide emissions each year (Schimel and others 2001). Carbon in wood remains stored until the wood deteriorates or is burned. A tree that remains in the forest and dies re- leases a portion of its carbon back into the atmosphere as the woody material decomposes. On the other hand, if the tree General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 of embodied energy relative to many other materials used in construction (such as steel, concrete, aluminum, or plastic). The sun provides the energy to grow the trees from which we produce wood products; fossil fuels are the primary en- ergy source in steel and concrete manufacture. Also, over half the energy consumed in manufacturing wood products in the United States is from biomass (or bioenergy) and is typically produced from tree bark, sawdust, and by-products of pulping in papermaking processes. The U.S. wood prod- ucts industry is the nation’s leading producer and consumer of bioenergy, accounting for about 60% of its energy needs (Table 1–1) (Murray and others 2006, EPA 2007). Solid- sawn wood products have the lowest level of embodied energy; wood products requiring more processing steps (for example, plywood, engineered wood products, flake-based products) require more energy to produce but still require significantly less energy than their non-wood counterparts. In some plantation forest operations, added energy costs may be associated with the use of fertilizer, pesticides, and greenhouses to grow tree seedlings. During the harvesting operation, energy is used to power harvesting equipment and for transporting logs to the mill. Lumber milling processes that consume energy include log and lumber transport, saw- ing, planing, and wood drying. Kiln drying is the most energy-consumptive process of lumber manufacture; how- ever, bioenergy from a mill’s waste wood is often used to heat thekilns. Unlike burning fossil fuels, using bioenergy for fuel is considered to be carbon neutral. Also, advances in kiln technologies over the past few decades have significant- ly reduced the amount of energy required in wood drying. Overall, the production of dry lumber requires about twice the energy of producing green (undried) lumber. The Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials (CORRIM) found that different methods of forest management affect the level of carbon sequestration in trees (Perez-Garcia and others 2005). They found that shorter ro- tation harvests can sequester more total carbon than longer rotation harvests. CORRIM also calculated differences in energy consumed and environmental impacts associated with resource extrac- tion, materials production, transportation, and disposal of homes built using different materials and processes. Table 1–1. Wood products industry fuel sourcesa Fuel source Proportion used (%) Net electricity 19 Natural gas 16 Fuel oil 3 Other (primarily biomass) 61 aEPA (2007). 1–3 is used to produce a wood or paper product, these products store carbon while in use. For example, solid wood lumber, a common wood product used in building construction (the building industry is the largest user of sawn wood in the United States), sequesters carbon for the life of the building. At the end of a building’s life, wood can be recovered for re-use in another structure, chipped for use as fuel or mulch, or sent to a landfill (usual fate). If burned or mulched, stored carbon is released when the wood decomposes, essentially the reverse process of photosynthesis: C6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O Carbon contained in wood products currently in-use and as wood debris in landfills is estimated at 2.5 billion tonnes and accumulates at a rate of about 28 million tonnes per year (Skog 2008). Much of the carbon contained within wood products resides in the nation’s housing stock, estimated at 116 million units in 2000. Skog (2008) estimated that in 2001, about 680 million tonnes of carbon was stored in the nation’s housing stock, nearly a third of the total carbon (2.5 billion tonnes) cited above. As indicated in Table 1–3, carbon emitted to produce a tonne of concrete is about eight times that emitted to pro- duce a tonne of framing lumber. A similar comparison for steel indicates that its production emits about 21 times as much carbon as an equal weight of framing lumber. Wood products also mitigate carbon emissions to the degree that they substitute for steel or concrete, which emit more green- house gases in their production. Also, because wood products have this low level of em- bodied energy compared with other building products and because wood is one-half carbon by weight, wood products can actually be carbon negative (Bowyer and others 2008). Comparisons of the environmental impact of various wood products have also been made using life cycle analysis software (Calkins 2009). The more processing involved in the manufacture of wood products (such as flaking, veneer cutting, added heat for pressing, gluing, kiln drying), the more impact on energy use, solid waste production, pollu- tion production, and global warming potential (carbon). Sustainability Unlike metals and fossil-fuel-based products (such as plastics), our forest resource is renewable and with proper management a flow of wood products can be maintained indefinitely. The importance of forest-based products to our economy and standard of living is hard to overemphasize— half of all major industrial raw materials we use in the Unit- ed States come from forests. However, the sustainability of this resource requires forestry and harvesting practices that ensure the long-term health and diversity of our forests. Un- fortunately, sustainable practices have not always been ap- plied in the past, nor are they universally applied around the world today. Architects, product designers, material speci- fiers, and homeowners are increasingly asking for building products that are certified to be from a sustainable source. For the forest products sector, the result of this demand has been the formation of forest certification programs. These programs not only ensure that the forest resource is harvest- ed in a sustainable fashion but also that issues of biodiver- sity, habitat protection, and indigenous peoples’ rights are included in land management plans. Forest Certification Programs More than 50 different forest certification systems in the world today represent nearly 700 million acres of forestland and 15,000 companies involved in producing and Table 1–2. Environmental performance indices for above-grade wall designs in residential constructiona Wood frame Steel frame Difference Changeb (%) Minneapolis design Embodied energy (GJ) 250 296 46 +18 Global warming potential (CO2 kg) 13,009 17,262 4,253 +33 Air emission index (index scale) 3,820 4,222 402 +11 Water emission index (index scale) 3 29 26 +867 Solid waste (total kg) 3,496 3,181 –315 –0.9 Atlanta design Embodied energy (GJ) 168 231 63 +38 Global warming potential (CO2 kg) 8,345 14,982 6,637 +80 Air emission index (index scale) 2,313 3,373 1,060 +46 Water emission index (index scale) 2 2 0 0 Solid waste (total kg) 2,325 6,152 3,827 +164 aLippke and others (2004). b% change = [(Steel frame – Wood frame)/(Wood frame)] × 100. Chapter 1 Wood as a Sustainable Building Material productivity while allowing for conservation of resources (Howe and others 2004). The growing trends in green building are helping drive certification in the construction market in the United States. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) FSC is an independent, non-governmental organization established to promote respon- sible management of the world’s forests and is probably the most well-known for- est certification program worldwide. More than 280 million acres of forest worldwide are certified to FSC standards and are distributed over 79 countries. The FSC program includes two types of certifications. The For- est Management Certification applies FSC standards of responsible forestry to management of the forest land. A Chain-of-Custody (COC) certification ensures that forest products that carry the FSC label can be tracked back to the certified forest from which they came. More than 9,000 COC certifications are in use by FSC members. The FSC has certified 18 certification bodies around the world. Four are located in the United States, including the non-profit Rainforest Alliance’s SmartWood program and the for-profit Scientific Certification Systems. Both organizations provide up-to-date lists of FSC-certified wood suppliers across the country. Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) The SFI program was established in 1994 and currently certifies over 152 million acres in the United States and Canada. This program has a strong wood industry focus and has been adopted by most of the major industrial forest landowners in the United States. It is based on the premise that responsible forest practices and sound business deci- sions can co-exist. The SFI program includes third-party certification, which verifies the requirements of the SFI 2010–2014 Standard. Independent certification bodies eval- uate planning, procedures, and processes in the forest and in wood processing operations. Annual surveillance audits are mandatory on all certified operations, and a full recertifica- tion audit is required for forest operations every 3 years. American Tree Farm System (ATFS) The American Tree Farm System, a program of the American Forest Founda- tion’s Center for Family Forests, is the oldest offorest certification programs and was established in 1941. The ATFS focuses its program on private family forest landowners in the United States. Currently, ATFS has certified 24 million acres of privately owned forestland and more than 90,000 family forest owners. The ATFS for- est certification standard requires forest owners to develop 1–4 marketing certified products. These programs represent about 8% of the global forest area and 13% of managed forests. From 2007 to 2008, the world’s certified forest area grew by nearly 9%. North America has certified more than one-third of its forests and Europe more than 50% of its for- ests; however, Africa and Asia have certified less than 0.1%. Approximately 80% to 90% of the world’s certified forests are located in the northern hemisphere, where two thirds of the world’s roundwood is produced (UNECE 2008). In North America, five major certification systems are used: • Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) • Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) • American Tree Farm System (ATFS) • Canadian Standards Association (CSA) • Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) schemes In terms of forest acreage under certification, the Forest Stewardship Council and the Sustainable Forestry Initia- tive dominate in the United States. These two systems evolved from different perspectives of sustainability. The FSC’s guidelines are geared more to preserve natural systems while allowing for careful harvest, whereas the SFI’s guidelines are aimed at encouraging fiber Table 1–3. Net carbon emissions in producing a tonne of various materials Material Net carbon emissions (kg C/t)a,b Near-term net carbon emissions including carbon storage within material (kg C/t)c,d Framing lumber 33 –457 Medium-density fiberboard (virgin fiber) 60 –382 Brick 88 88 Glass 154 154 Recycled steel (100% from scrap) 220 220 Concrete 265 265 Concretee 291 291 Recycled aluminum (100% recycled content) 309 309 Steel (virgin) 694 694 Plastic 2,502 2,502 Aluminum (virgin) 4,532 4,532 aValues are based on life-cycle assessment and include gathering and processing of raw materials, primary and secondary processing, and transportation. bSource: EPA (2006). cFrom Bowyer and others (2008); a carbon content of 49% is assumed for wood. dThe carbon stored within wood will eventually be emitted back to the atmosphere at the end of the useful life of the wood product. eDerived based on EPA value for concrete and consideration of additional steps involved in making blocks. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 a management plan based on strict environmental standards and pass an inspection by an ATFS inspecting forester. Third-party certification audits, conducted by firms ac- credited by the ANSI–ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB) or the Standards Council of Canada (SCC), are required for all certifications of the ATFS. Canadian Standards Association (CSA) The Canadian Standards Association is a non-profit organization and has developed over 2,000 different standards for a vari- ety of industries. The CSA first published Canada’s National Standard for Sustain- able Forest Management (SFM) CAN/CSA-Z809 in 1996. The SFM program has four components: the SFM Standard itself, a Chain-of-Custody program, product marking, and the CSA International Forest Products Group, which pro- motes the program. The CSA Standard has been adopted by the major industrial forestland managers in Canada. As of June 2007, about 60% (198 million acres) of Canadian forests were certified under the CAN/CSA-Z809 SFM Standard. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) Schemes The multitude of certification programs with competing standards and claims has made it difficult for land managers, mem- bers of the wood industry, and consumers to determine which certification program fits their needs (Fernholz and others 2004). The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certifica- tion schemes was developed to address this issue and serves as an umbrella endorsement system that provides interna- tional recognition for national forest certification programs. Founded in 1999, the PEFC represents most of the world’s certified forest programs and the production of millions of tons of certified timber. The FSC, SFI, and ATFS programs have received official PEFC endorsement. Additional Information Helpful online tools provide more information and data on forest certification, including the Forest Certification Re- source Center (www.metafore.org), which identifies forests, manufacturers, distributors, importers, and retailers certi- fied under FSC, SFI, and CSA programs. The database is searchable by product, location, and certification system. Another helpful resource is the Forest Products Annual Market Review (www.unece.org), which provides general and statistical information on forest products markets in the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and covers the regions of Europe, North Ameri- ca, and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Literature Cited Birdsey, R.; Lewis, G. 2002. Carbon in U.S. forests and wood products, 1987–1997: state by state estimates. Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR–NE–310. Washington, DC: U.S. Depart- ment of Agriculture, Forest Service. Bowyer, J.; Bratkovich, S.; Lindberg, A.; Fernholz, K. 2008. Wood products and carbon protocols: carbon storage and low energy intensity should be considered. Minneapolis, MN: Dovetail Partners, Inc. www.dovetailinc.org. (28 April 2008). 13 p. Calkins, M. 2009. Materials for sustainable sites: a complete guide to the evaluation, selection, and use of sustainable construction materials. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 457 p. EPA. 2006. Solid waste management and greenhouse gas- es—a life cycle assessment of emissions and sinks. 3rd Ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA. 2007. Energy trends in selected manufacturing sectors: opportunities and challenges for environmentally preferable energy outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Economics and Innova- tion. (March 2007). Fernholz, K.; Howe, J.; Guillery, P.; Bowyer, J. 2004. Be- ginner’s guide to third-party forest certification: shining a light on the programme for the endorsement of forest certi- fication schemes (PEFC). Minneapolis, MN: Dovetail Part- ners, Inc. www.dovetailinc.org. Fernholz, K.; Howe, J.; Guillery, P.; Bowyer, J. 2005. Be- ginner’s guide to third-party forest certification: shining a light on the Canadian Standards Association (CSA). Minne- apolis, MN: Dovetail Partners, Inc. www.dovetailinc.org. (18 January 2005). 10 p. Howe, J.; Fernholz, K.; Guillery, P.; Bowyer, J. 2004. A land manager’s guide to FSC & SFI—to certify or not to certify: is that a question? Minneapolis, MN: Dovetail Partners, Inc. www.dovetailinc.org. (15 September 2004). 13 p. Lippke, B.; Wilson, J.; Perez-Garcia, J.; Bowyer, J.; Meil, J. 2004. CORRIM: life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials. Forest Products Journal. 54(6): 13. (June 2004). Murray, B.; Nicholson, R.; Ross, M.; Holloway, T.; Patil, S. 2006. Biomass energy consumption in the forest products industry. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy; Re- search Triangle Park, NC: RTI International. 81 p. Negra, C.; Sweedo, C.; Cavender-Bares, K.; O’Malley, R. 2008. Indicators of carbon storage in U.S. ecosystems: base- line for terrestrial carbon accounting. Journal of Environ- mental Quality. 37: 1376–1382. 1–5 Chapter 1 Wood as a Sustainable Building Material 1–6 Perez-Garcia, J.; Lippke, B.; Briggs, D.; Wilson, J.; Bowyer, J.;Meil, J. 2005. The environmental performance of renew- able building materials in the context of residential con- struction. Wood and Fiber Science. (37)12: 3–17. Schimel, D.S.; House, J.I.; Hibbard, K.A.; Bousquet, P.; Ciais, P.; Peylin, P.; Braswell, B.H.; Apps, M.J.; Baker, D.; Bondeau, A.; Canadell, J.; Churkina, G.; Cramer, W.; Denning, A.S.; Field, C.B.; Friedlingstein, P.; Goodale, C.; Heimann, M.; Houghton, R.A.; Melillo, J.M.; Moore, B., III; Murdiyarso, D.; Noble, I.; Pacala, S.W.; Prentice, I.C.; Raupach, M.R.; Rayner, P.J.; Scholes, R.J.; Steffen, W.L.; Wirth, C. 2001. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature. 414: 169–172. Skog, K. 2008. Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. Forest Products Journal. 58(6): 56–72. UNECE / FAO. 2008. Forest products annual market review 2007–2008. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe / Food and Agriculture Organiza- tion. www.unece.org/trade/timber. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 CHAPTER 2 Characteristics and Availability of Commercially Important Woods Michael C. Wiemann, Research Botanist 2–1 Throughout history, the unique characteristics and abun- dance of wood have made it a natural material for homes and other structures, furniture, tools, vehicles, and decora- tive objects. Today, for the same reasons, wood is prized for a multitude of uses. All wood is composed of cellulose, lignin, hemicelluloses, and minor amounts (usually less than 10%) of extraneous materials contained in a cellular structure. Variations in the characteristics and proportions of these components and differences in cellular structure make woods heavy or light, stiff or flexible, and hard or soft. The properties of a single species are relatively constant within limits; therefore, selec- tion of wood by species alone may sometimes be adequate. However, to use wood to its best advantage and most effec- tively in engineering applications, specific characteristics or physical properties must be considered. Historically, some species filled many purposes, whereas other less available or less desirable species served only one or two needs. For example, because white oak is tough, strong, and durable, it was highly prized for shipbuilding, bridges, cooperage, barn timbers, farm implements, railroad crossties, fence posts, and flooring. Woods such as black walnut and cherry were used primarily for furniture and cabinets. Hickory was manufactured into tough, hard, and resilient striking-tool handles, and black locust was prized for barn timbers. It was commonly accepted that wood from trees grown in certain locations under certain conditions was stronger, more durable, more easily worked with tools, or finer grained than wood from trees in other locations. Mod- ern research on wood has substantiated that location and growth conditions do significantly affect wood properties. This chapter presents brief descriptions of many species; current and, in many cases, historic uses are cited to illus- trate the utility of the wood. Gradual reductions in use of old-growth forests in the United States have reduced the supply of large clear logs for lumber and veneer. However, the importance of high-quality logs has diminished as new concepts of wood use have been introduced. Second-growth wood, the remaining old-growth forests, and imports continue to fill the needs for wood in the quality required. Wood is as valuable an engineering material as ever, and in many cases, technological advances have made it even more useful. Inherent factors that keep wood in the forefront of raw materials are many and varied, but a chief attribute is its Contents Timber Resources and Uses 2–2 Hardwoods and Softwoods 2–2 Commercial Sources of Wood Products 2–2 Use Classes and Trends 2–2 Species Descriptions 2–3 U.S. Hardwoods 2–3 U.S. Softwoods 2–11 Imported Woods 2–18 Imported Hardwoods 2–19 Imported Softwoods 2–38 Scientific Name Index 2–41 U.S. Wood Species—Hardwoods 2–41 U.S. Wood Species—Softwoods 2–42 Imported Woods—Hardwoods 2–43 Imported Woods—Softwoods 2–44 Literature Cited 2–45 Additional References 2–45 2–2 Botanically, softwoods are gymnosperms or conifers; their seeds are not enclosed in the ovary of the flower. Ana- tomically, softwoods are nonporous (they do not contain vessels). Softwoods are usually cone-bearing plants with needle- or scale-like evergreen leaves. Some softwoods, such as larches and baldcypress, lose their needles during autumn or winter. Major resources of softwood species are spread across the United States, except for the Great Plains, where only small areas are forested. The hardwood resource is concentrated in the eastern United States, with only a few commercial spe- cies found in Washington, Oregon, and California. Softwood and hardwood species of the continental United States are often loosely grouped in three general regions, as shown in Table 2–1. Commercial Sources of Wood Products Softwoods are available directly from sawmills, wholesale and retail yards, or lumber brokers. Softwood lumber and plywood are used in construction for forms, scaffolding, framing, sheathing, flooring, moulding, paneling, cabinets, poles and piles, and many other building components. Softwoods may also appear in the form of shingles, sashes, doors, and other millwork, in addition to some rough prod- ucts such as timber and round posts. Hardwoods are used in construction for flooring, architectur- al woodwork, interior woodwork, and paneling. These items are usually available from lumberyards and building supply dealers. Most hardwood lumber and dimension stock are remanufactured into furniture, flooring, pallets, containers, dunnage, and blocking. Hardwood lumber and dimension stock are available directly from manufacturers, through wholesalers and brokers, and from some retail yards. Both softwood and hardwood products are distributed throughout the United States. Local preferences and the availability of certain species may influence choice, but a wide selection of woods is generally available for building construction, industrial uses, remanufacturing, and home use. Use Classes and Trends Major wood-based industries include those that convert wood to thin slices (veneer), particles (chips, flakes), or fiber pulps and reassemble the elements to produce various types of engineered panels such as plywood, particleboard, orient- ed strandboard, laminated veneer lumber, paper, paperboard, and fiberboard products. Another newer wood industry is the production of laminated wood products. The lumber indus- try has also produced smaller amounts of railroad crossties, cooperage, shingles, and shakes. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 availability in many species, sizes, shapes, and conditions to suit almost every demand. Wood has a high ratio of strength to weight and a remarkable record for durability and perfor- mance as a structural material. Dry wood has good insulat- ing properties against heat, sound, and electricity. It tends to absorb and dissipate vibrations under some conditions of use, and yet it is an incomparable material for musical instruments. The grain patterns and colors of wood make it an esthetically pleasing material, and its appearance may be easily enhanced by stains, varnishes, lacquers, and other finishes. It is easily shaped with tools and fastened with ad- hesives, nails, screws, bolts, and dowels. Damaged wood is easily repaired, and wood structures are easily remodeled or altered. In addition, wood resists oxidation,acid, saltwater, and other corrosive agents, has high salvage value, has good shock resistance, can be treated with preservatives and fire retardants, and can be combined with almost any other ma- terial for both functional and aesthetic uses. Timber Resources and Uses In the United States, more than 100 wood species are avail- able to the prospective user; about 60% of these are of major commercial importance. Another 30 species are commonly imported in the form of logs, cants, lumber, and veneer for industrial uses, the building trade, and crafts. A continuing program of timber inventory is in effect in the United States through the cooperation of Federal and State agencies, and new information on wood resources is pub- lished in State and Federal reports. Two of the most valuable sourcebooks are An Analysis of the Timber Situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050 (Haynes 2003) and The 2005 RPA Timber Assessment Update (Haynes and others 2007). Current information on wood consumption, production, im- ports, and supply and demand is published periodically by the Forest Products Laboratory (Howard 2007). Hardwoods and Softwoods Trees are divided into two broad classes, usually referred to as hardwoods and softwoods. These names can be confus- ing because some softwoods are actually harder than some hardwoods, and conversely some hardwoods are softer than some softwoods. For example, softwoods such as longleaf pine and Douglas-fir are typically harder than the hard- woods basswood and aspen. Botanically, hardwoods are angiosperms; their seeds are enclosed in the ovary of the flower. Anatomically, hardwoods are porous; that is, they contain vessel elements. A vessel element is a wood cell with open ends; when vessel elements are set one above an- other, they form a continuous tube (vessel), which serves as a conduit for transporting water or sap in the tree. Typically, hardwoods are plants with broad leaves that, with few ex- ceptions in the temperate region, lose their leaves in autumn or winter. Most imported tropical woods are hardwoods. 2–3 Species Descriptions In this chapter, each species or group of species is described in terms of its principal location, characteristics, and uses. More detailed information on the properties of these and other species is given in various tables throughout this handbook. Information on historical and traditional uses is provided for some species to illustrate their utility. A low- magnification micrograph of a representative cross-section of each species or species group accompanies each descrip- tion. The slides for these micrographs are from the Forest Products Laboratory collection. The micrographs are printed at magnifications of approximately 15×. Their color is a consequence of the stains used to accentuate anatomical fea- tures and is not indicative of the actual wood color. U.S. Hardwoods Alder, Red Red alder (Alnus rubra) grows along the Pacific coast between Alaska and California. It is the principal hardwood for commercial manufacture of wood products in Oregon and Washington and the most abundant commercial hardwood species in these two states. The wood of red alder varies from almost white to pale pinkish brown, and there is no visible boundary between heartwood and sapwood. Red alder is moderately light in weight and intermediate in most strength properties but low in shock resistance. It has relatively low shrinkage. The principal use of red alder is for furniture, but it is also used for sash and door panel stock and other millwork. Ash (Black Ash Group) The black ash group includes black ash (Fraxinus nigra) and pumpkin ash (F. profun‑ da). Black ash grows in the Northeast and Midwest, and pumpkin ash in the South. The heartwood of black ash is a darker brown than that of American white ash; the sapwood is light-colored or nearly white. The wood of the black ash group is lighter in weight (basic specific gravity of 0.45 to 0.48) than that of the white ash group (basic specific gravity greater than 0.50). Principal uses for the black ash group are decorative veneer, cabinets, millwork, furniture, cooperage, and crates. Ash (White Ash Group) Important species of the white ash group are Ameri- can white ash (Fraxinus americana), green ash (F. pennsylvanica), blue ash (F. quadrangulata), and Oregon ash (F. latifolia). The first three species grow in the eastern half of the United States. Oregon ash grows along the Pacific Coast. The heartwood of the white ash group is brown, and the sapwood is light-colored or nearly white. Second-growth trees are particularly sought after because of the inherent qualities of the wood from these trees: it is heavy, strong, hard, and stiff, and it has high resistance to shock. Oregon ash has somewhat lower strength properties than American Table 2–1. Major resources of U.S. woods according to region Western Northern and Appalachian Southern Hardwoods Alder, red Ash Ash Ash, Oregon Aspen Basswood Aspen Basswood Beech Birch, paper Beech Butternut Cottonwood Birch Cottonwood Maple, bigleaf Buckeye Elm Oak, California black Butternut Hackberry Oak, Oregon white Cherry Hickory Tanoak Cottonwood Honeylocust Elm Locust, black Hackberry Magnolia Hickory Maple, soft Honeylocust Oak, red and white Locust, black Sassafras Maple, hard Sweetgum Maple, soft Sycamore Oak, red and white Tupelo Sycamore Walnut Walnut Willow Yellow-poplar Yellow-poplar Softwoods Douglas-fir Cedar, northern white Baldcypress Fir, western Fir, balsam Cedar, Atlantic white Hemlock, western and mountain Hemlock, eastern Pine, eastern white Fir, Fraser Pine, southern Incense-cedar Pine, Jack Redcedar, eastern Larch, western Pine, red Pine, lodgepole Redcedar, eastern Pine, ponderosa Spruce, eastern Pine, sugar Tamarack Pine, western white Port-Orford-cedar Redcedar, western Redwood Spruce, Engelmann Spruce, Sitka Yellow-cedar Chapter 2 Characteristics and Availability of Commercially Important Woods 2–4 of either species. Basswood grows in the eastern half of North America from the Canadian provinces southward. Most basswood lumber comes from the Lake, Middle At- lantic, and Central States. The heartwood of basswood is pale yellowish brown with occasional darker streaks. Basswood has wide, creamy white or pale brown sapwood that merges gradually into heartwood. When dry, the wood is without odor or taste. It is soft and light in weight, has fine, even texture, and is straight grained and easy to work with tools. Shrinkage in width and thickness during drying is rated as high; however, basswood seldom warps in use. Basswood lumber is used mainly in venetian blinds, sashes and door frames, moulding, apiary supplies, wooden ware, and boxes. Some basswood is cut for veneer, cooperage, ex- celsior, and pulpwood, and it is a favorite of wood carvers. Beech, American Only one species of beech, American beech (Fagus grandifolia), is native to the United States. It grows in the eastern one-third of the United States and adjacent Canadian provinces. The greatest production of beech lumber is in the Central and Middle Atlantic States. In some beech trees, color varies from nearly white sap- wood to reddish-brown heartwood. Sometimes there is no clear line of demarcation between heartwood and sapwood. Sapwood may be roughly 7 to 13 cm (3 to 5 in.) wide. The wood has little figure and is of close, uniform texture. It has no characteristic taste or odor. The wood of beech is classed as heavy, hard, strong, high in resistance to shock, and high- ly suitable for steam bending. Beech shrinks substantially and therefore requirescareful drying. It machines smoothly, is an excellent wood for turning, wears well, and is rather easily treated with preservatives. Most beech is used for flooring, furniture, brush blocks, handles, veneer, woodenware, containers, and cooperage. When treated with preservative, beech is suitable for rail- way ties. Birch The three most important species are yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), sweet birch (B. lenta), and paper birch (B. papyrifera). These three species are the source of most birch lumber and veneer. Other birch species of some commercial white ash, but it is used for similar purposes on the West Coast. American white ash (F. americana) and green ash (F. penn‑ sylvanica) that grow in southern river bottoms, especially in areas frequently flooded for long periods, produce but- tresses that contain relatively lightweight and brash wood. American white ash is used principally for nonstriking tool handles, oars, baseball bats, and other sporting and athletic goods. For handles of the best grade, some handle specifi- cations call for not less than 2 nor more than 7 growth rings per centimeter (not less than 5 nor more than 17 growth rings per inch). The additional weight requirement of 690 kg m–3 (43 lb ft–3) or more at 12% moisture content ensures high-quality material. Principal uses for the white ash group are decorative veneer, cabinets, furniture, floor- ing, millwork, and crates. Aspen Aspen is a generally recognized name that is applied to bigtooth (Populus grandidentata) and quaking (P. tremuloides) aspen. Aspen lumber is produced principally in the northeastern and Lake States, with some production in the Rocky Mountain States. The heartwood of aspen is grayish white to light gray- ish brown. The sapwood is lighter colored and generally merges gradually into the heartwood without being clearly marked. Aspen wood is usually straight grained with a fine, uniform texture. It is easily worked. Well-dried aspen lumber does not impart odor or flavor to foodstuffs. The wood of aspen is lightweight and soft. It is low in strength, moderately stiff, and moderately low in resistance to shock and has moderately high shrinkage. Aspen is cut for lumber, pallets, boxes and crating, pulp- wood, particleboard, strand panels, excelsior, matches, ve- neer, and miscellaneous turned articles. Today, aspen is one of the preferred species for use in oriented strandboard, a panel product that dominates the sheathing market. Basswood American basswood (Tilia americana) is the most important of the native basswood species; next in importance is white bass- wood (T. heterophylla), and no attempt is made to distinguish between these species in lumber form. In commercial usage, “white basswood” is used to specify the white wood or sapwood General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 2–5 importance are river birch (B. nigra), and gray birch (B. populifolia). Paper birch is transcontinental, whereas yellow and sweet birch grow principally in the North- east and the Lake States; yellow and sweet birch also grow along the Appalachian Mountains to northern Georgia. Yellow birch has white sapwood and light reddish-brown heartwood. Sweet birch has light-colored sapwood and dark brown heartwood tinged with red. For both yellow and sweet birch, the wood is heavy, hard, and strong, and has good shock-resisting ability. The wood is fine and uniform in texture. Paper birch is lower in weight, softer, and lower in strength than yellow and sweet birch. Birch shrinks con- siderably during drying. Yellow and sweet birch lumber is used primarily for the manufacture of furniture, boxes, baskets, crates, wooden ware, cooperage, interior woodwork, and doors; veneer plywood is used for doors, furniture, paneling, cabinets, aircraft, and other specialty uses. Paper birch is used for toothpicks, tongue depressors, ice cream sticks, and turned products, including spools, bobbins, small handles, and toys. Buckeye Buckeye consists of two spe- cies, yellow buckeye (Aes‑ culus octandra) and Ohio buckeye (A. glabra). These species range from the Ap- palachians of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and North Carolina westward to Kansas, Okla- homa, and Texas. Buckeye is not customarily separated from other species when manu- factured into lumber and can be used for the same purposes as aspen (Populus), basswood (Tilia), and sapwood of yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). The white sapwood of buckeye merges gradually into the creamy or yellowish white heartwood. The wood is uniform in texture, generally straight grained, light in weight, soft, and low in shock resistance. It is rated low on machinability such as shaping, mortising, boring, and turning. Buckeye is suitable for pulping for paper; in lumber form, it has been used principally for furniture, boxes and crates, food containers, wooden ware, novelties, and planing mill products. Butternut Also called white walnut, butternut (Juglans cinerea) grows from southern New Brunswick and Maine west to Minnesota. Its southern range extends into northeast- ern Arkansas and eastward to western North Carolina. The narrow sapwood is nearly white and the heartwood is light brown, frequently modified by pinkish tones or darker brown streaks. The wood is moderately light in weight, rather coarse textured, moderately weak in bending and endwise compression, relatively low in stiffness, moderate- ly soft, and moderately high in shock resistance. Butternut machines easily and finishes well. In many ways, butternut resembles black walnut, especially when stained, but it does not have the same strength or hardness. Principal uses are for lumber and veneer, which are further manufactured into furniture, cabinets, paneling, interior woodwork, and miscellaneous rough items. Cherry, Black Black cherry (Prunus sero‑ tina) is sometimes known as cherry, wild black cherry, and wild cherry. It is the only native species of the genus Prunus that produces commercial lumber. Black cherry is found from south- eastern Canada throughout the eastern half of the United States. Production is centered chiefly in the Middle Atlantic States. The heartwood of black cherry varies from light to dark reddish brown and has a distinctive luster. The nearly white sapwood is narrow in old-growth trees and wider in second- growth trees. The wood has a fairly uniform texture and very good machining properties. It is moderately heavy, strong, stiff, and moderately hard, with high shock resis- tance. Although it has moderately high shrinkage, it is very dimensionally stable after drying. Black cherry is used principally for furniture, fine veneer panels, and architectural woodwork. Other uses include burial caskets, wooden ware, novelties, patterns, and paneling. Chestnut, American American chestnut (Casta‑ nea dentata) is also known as sweet chestnut. Before this species was attacked by a blight in the 1920s, it grew in commercial quantities from New England to north- ern Georgia. Practically all standing chestnut has been killed by blight, and most sup- plies of the lumber come from salvaged timbers. Because of the species’ natural resistance to decay, standing dead trees in the Appalachian Mountains continued to provide substantial quantities of lumber for several decades after the blight, but this source is now exhausted. The heartwood of chestnut is grayish brown or brown and darkens with age. The sapwood is very narrow and almost Chapter 2 Characteristics and Availability of Commercially Important Woods 2–6 September (U. serotina) elm. American elm is also known as white elm, slippery elm as redelm, rock elm as cork elm, and winged elm as wahoo. American elm is threatened by two diseases, Dutch Elm disease and phloem necrosis, which have killed hundreds of thousands of trees. Sapwood of elm is nearly white and heartwood light brown, often tinged with red. Elm may be divided into two general classes, soft and hard, based on the weight and strength of the wood. Soft elm includes American and slippery elm. It is moderately heavy, has high shock resistance, and is moderately hard and stiff. Hard elm includes rock, winged, cedar, and September elm. These species are somewhat heavier than soft elm. Elm has excellent bending qualities. Historically, elm lumber was used for boxes, baskets, crates, slack cooperage, furniture, agricultural supplies and implements, caskets and burial boxes, and wood compo- nents in vehicles. Today, elm lumber and veneer are used mostly for furniture and decorative panels. Hard elm is pre- ferred for uses that require strength. Hackberry Hackberry (Celtis occi‑ dentalis) and sugarberry (C. laevigata) supply the lumber known in the trade as hackberry. Hackberry grows east of the Great Plains from Alabama, Geor- gia, Arkansas, and Oklaho- ma northward, except along the Canadian boundary. Sugar- berry overlaps the southern part of the hackberry range and grows throughout the Southern and South Atlantic States. Sapwood of both species varies from pale yellow to green- ish or grayish yellow. The heartwood is commonly darker. The wood resembles elm in structure. Hackberry lumber is moderately heavy. It is moderately strong in bending, mod- erately weak in compression parallel to grain, moderately hard to very hard, and high in shock resistance, but low in stiffness. Hackberry has high shrinkage but keeps its shape well during drying. Most hackberry is cut into lumber; small amounts are used for furniture parts, dimension stock, and veneer. Hickory (Pecan Hickory Group) Species of the pecan hick- ory group include bitternut hickory (Carya cordifor‑ mis), pecan hickory (C. illinoensis), water hickory (C. aquatica), and nutmeg hickory (C. myristiciformis). Bitter- nut hickory grows through- out the eastern half of the United States; pecan hickory, from central Texas and Louisiana to Missouri and Indiana; white. The wood is coarse in texture; growth rings are made conspicuous by several rows of large, distinct pores at the beginning of each year’s growth. Chestnut wood is moder- ately light in weight, moderately hard, moderately low in strength, moderately low in resistance to shock, and low in stiffness. It dries well and is easy to work with tools. Chestnut was once used for flooring, poles, railroad cross- ties, furniture, caskets, boxes, shingles, crates, and core- stock for veneer panels. At present, it appears most fre- quently as wormy chestnut for paneling, interior woodwork, and picture frames. Cottonwood Cottonwood includes sev- eral species of the genus Populus. Most important are eastern cottonwood (P. del‑ toides and its varieties), also known as Carolina poplar and whitewood; swamp cot- tonwood (P. heterophylla), also known as river cottonwood and swamp poplar; black cottonwood (P. trichocarpa); and balsam poplar (P. balsam‑ ifera). Eastern and swamp cottonwood grow throughout the eastern half of the United States. Greatest production of lumber is in the Southern and Central States. Black cot- tonwood grows on the West Coast and in western Montana, northern Idaho, and western Nevada. Balsam poplar grows from Alaska across Canada and in the northern Great Lakes States. The heartwood of cottonwood is grayish white to light brown. The sapwood is whitish and merges gradually with the heartwood. The wood is comparatively uniform in tex- ture and generally straight grained. It is odorless when well dried. Eastern cottonwood is moderately low in bending and compressive strength, moderately stiff, moderately soft, and moderately low in ability to resist shock. Most strength properties of black cottonwood are slightly lower than those of eastern cottonwood. Both eastern and black cottonwood have moderately high shrinkage. Some cottonwood is dif- ficult to work with tools because of its fuzzy surface, which is mainly the result of tension wood. Cottonwood is used principally for lumber, veneer, pulp- wood, excelsior, and fuel. Lumber and veneer are used pri- marily for boxes, crates, baskets, and pallets. Elm Six species of elm grow in the eastern United States: American (Ulmus americana), slippery (U. rubra), rock (U. thoma‑ sii), winged (U. alata), cedar (U. crassifolia), and General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 2–7 water hickory, from Texas to South Carolina; and nutmeg hickory, in Texas and Louisiana. The sapwood of this group is white or nearly white and rel- atively wide. The heartwood is somewhat darker. The wood is heavy and sometimes has very high shrinkage. Heavy pecan hickory is used for tool and implement handles and flooring. The lower grades are used for pallets. Many higher grade logs are sliced to provide veneer for fur- niture and decorative paneling. Hickory (True Hickory Group) True hickories are found throughout the eastern half of the United States. The species most important commercially are shagbark (Carya ovata), pignut (C. glabra), shellbark (C. laciniosa), and mock- ernut (C. tomentosa). The greatest commercial production of the true hickories for all uses is in the Middle Atlantic and Central States, with the Southern and South Atlantic States rapidly expanding to handle nearly half of all hickory lumber. The sapwood of the true hickory group is white and usu- ally quite wide, except in old, slow-growing trees. The heartwood is reddish. The wood is exceptionally tough, heavy, hard, and strong, and shrinks considerably in drying. For some purposes, both rings per centimeter (or inch) and weight are limiting factors where strength is important. The major use for high quality hickory is for tool handles that require high shock resistance. It is also used for lad- der rungs, athletic goods, agricultural implements, dowels, gymnasium apparatuses, poles, and furniture. Lower grade hickory is not suitable for the special uses of high quality hickory because of knottiness or other growth features and low density. However, the lower grade is useful for pallets and similar items. Hickory sawdust, chips, and some solid wood are used to flavor meat by smoking. Honeylocust The wood of honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos) has many desirable qualities, such as attractive figure and color, hardness, and strength, but it is little used because of its scarcity. This species is found most com- monly in the eastern United States, except for New England and the South Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains. Sapwood is generally wide and yellowish, in contrast to the light red to reddish-brown heartwood. The wood is very heavy, very hard, strong in bending, stiff, resistant to shock, and durable when in contact with the ground. When available, honeylocust is primarily used locally for fence posts and general construction. It is occasionally used with other species in lumber for pallets and crating. Locust, Black Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) is some- times called yellow locust. This species grows from Pennsylvania along the Appalachian Mountains to northern Georgia and Alabama. It is also native to western Arkansas and southern Missouri. The greatest production of black locust timber is in Tennessee, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia. Locust has narrow, creamy white sapwood. The heartwood, when freshly cut, varies from greenish yellow to dark brown. Black locust is very heavy, very hard, very resistantto shock, and very strong and stiff. It has moderately low shrinkage. The heartwood has high decay resistance. Black locust is used for round, hewn, or split mine timbers as well as fence posts, poles, railroad crossties, stakes, and fuel. Other uses are for rough construction and crating. Historically, black locust was important for the manufacture of insulator pins and wooden pegs used in the construction of ships, for which the wood was well adapted because of its strength, decay resistance, and moderate shrinkage and swelling. Magnolia Commercial magnolia consists of three species: southern magnolia (Mag‑ nolia grandiflora), sweet- bay (M. virginiana), and cucumbertree (M. acuminata). Other names for southern magnolia are evergreen magnolia, big laurel, and bull bay. Sweetbay is sometimes called swamp magnolia. The lumber produced by all three species is simply called magnolia. The natural range of sweetbay extends along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts from Long Island to Texas, and that of southern magnolia ex- tends from North Carolina to Texas. Cucumbertree grows from the Appalachians to the Ozarks northward to Ohio. Louisiana leads in the production of magnolia lumber. Sapwood of southern magnolia is yellowish white, and heartwood is light to dark brown with a tinge of yellow or green. The wood, which has close, uniform texture and is Chapter 2 Characteristics and Availability of Commercially Important Woods 2–8 Heartwood and sapwood are similar in appearance to hard maple. Heartwood of soft maple is somewhat lighter in color than the sapwood and somewhat wider. The wood of soft maple, primarily silver and red maple, resembles that of hard maple but is not as heavy, hard, and strong. Soft maple is used for railroad crossties, boxes, pallets, crates, furniture, veneer, wooden ware, and novelties. Oak, Live See Oak (Tropical) Oak (Red Oak Group) Most red oak comes from the Eastern States. The principal species are northern red (Quercus ru‑ bra), scarlet (Q. coccinea), Shumard (Q. shumardii), pin (Q. palustris), Nuttall (Q. nuttallii), black (Q. velutina), southern red (Q. falcata), cherrybark (Q. falcata var. pagodaefolia), water (Q. nigra), laurel (Q. laurifolia), and willow (Q. phel‑ los) oak. The sapwood is nearly white and roughly 2 to 5 cm (1 to 2 in.) wide. The heartwood is brown with a tinge of red. Sawn lumber of the red oak group cannot be separated by species on the basis of wood characteristics alone. Red oak lumber can be separated from white oak by the size and arrangement of pores in latewood and because it generally lacks tyloses in the pores. The open pores of red oak make this species group unsuitable for tight cooperage, unless the barrels are lined with sealer or plastic. Quartersawn lumber of the oaks is distinguished by its broad and conspicuous rays. Wood of the red oaks is heavy. Rapidly grown second- growth wood is generally harder and tougher than finer textured old-growth wood. The red oaks have fairly high shrinkage upon drying. The red oaks are primarily cut into lumber, railroad cross- ties, mine timbers, fence posts, veneer, pulpwood, and fuelwood. Ties, mine timbers, and fence posts require pre- servative treatment for satisfactory service. Red oak lumber is remanufactured into flooring, furniture, general millwork, boxes, pallets and crates, agricultural implements, caskets, wooden ware, and handles. It is also used in railroad cars and boats. Oak (White Oak Group) White oak lumber comes chiefly from the South, South Atlantic, and Cen- tral States, including the southern Appalachian area. Principal species are white (Quercus alba), generally straight grained, closely resembles yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). It is moderately heavy, moder- ately low in shrinkage, moderately low in bending and com- pressive strength, moderately hard and stiff, and moderately high in shock resistance. Sweetbay is much like southern magnolia. The wood of cucumbertree is similar to that of yellow-poplar (L. tulipifera). Cucumbertree that grows in the yellow-poplar range is not separated from that species on the market. Magnolia lumber is used principally in the manufacture of furniture, boxes, pallets, venetian blinds, sashes, doors, ve- neer, and millwork. Maple (Hard Maple Group) Hard maple includes sugar maple (Acer sac‑ charum) and black maple (A. nigrum). Sugar maple is also known as rock maple, and black maple as black sugar maple. Maple lumber is manu- factured principally in the Middle Atlantic and Great Lake States, which together account for about two-thirds of production. The heartwood is usually light reddish brown but some- times considerably darker. The sapwood is commonly white with a slight reddish-brown tinge. It is usually 8 to 12 cm (3 to 5 in.) wide. Hard maple has a fine, uniform texture. It is heavy, strong, stiff, hard, and resistant to shock and has high shrinkage. The grain of sugar maple is generally straight, but birdseye, curly, or fiddleback grain is often se- lected for furniture or novelty items. Hard maple is used principally for lumber and veneer. A large proportion is manufactured into flooring, furniture, cabinets, cutting boards and blocks, pianos, billiard cues, handles, novelties, bowling alleys, dance and gymnasium floors, spools, and bobbins. Maple (Soft Maple Group) Soft maple includes silver maple (Acer sacchari‑ num), red maple (A. rubrum), boxelder (A. negundo), and bigleaf maple (A. macrophyl‑ lum). Silver maple is also known as white, river, water, and swamp maple; red maple as soft, water, scarlet, white, and swamp maple; boxelder as ash-leaved, three-leaved, and cut-leaved maple; and bigleaf maple as Oregon maple. Soft maple is found in the eastern United States except for bigleaf maple, which comes from the Pacific Coast. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–190 2–9 chestnut (Q. prinus), post (Q. stellata), overcup (Q. lyrata), swamp chestnut (Q. michauxii), bur (Q. macrocarpa), chinkapin (Q. muehlenbergii), and swamp white (Q. bicolor). The most important western oak species, Or- egon white oak (Q. garryana), is a member of this group. The sapwood of the white oaks is nearly white and roughly 2 to 5 cm (1 to 2 in.) wide. The heartwood is generally grayish brown. Heartwood pores are usually plugged with tyloses, which tend to make the wood impenetrable to liq- uids. Consequently, most white oaks are suitable for tight cooperage, although many heartwood pores of chestnut oak lack tyloses. The wood of white oak is somewhat heavier than the wood of red oak. Its heartwood has good decay resistance. White oaks are usually cut into lumber, railroad crossties, cooperage, mine timbers, fence posts, veneer, fuelwood, and many other products. High-quality white oak is es- pecially sought for tight cooperage. An important use of white oak is for planking and bent parts of ships and boats; heartwood is often specified because of its decay resistance. White oak is also used for furniture, flooring, pallets, agri- cultural implements, railroad cars, truck floors, furniture, doors, and millwork. Sassafras Sassafras (Sassafras albi‑ dum) ranges from south- eastern Iowa and eastern Texas eastward. Sassafras is easily confused with black ash, which it re- sembles in color, grain, and texture. Sapwood is light yellow, and heartwood varies from dull grayish brown to dark brown, sometimes with a reddish tinge. Freshly cut surfaces have a characteristic odor. The wood is moderately heavy, moderately hard, moderately weak in bending and endwise compression, quite high in shock resistance, and resistant to decay. Sassafras was highly prized by the native Americans for dugout canoes, and some
Compartilhar