[G. Edward Griffin] Fearful Master A Second Look (BookZZ.org)
150 pág.

[G. Edward Griffin] Fearful Master A Second Look (BookZZ.org)


DisciplinaGeopolítica1.175 materiais3.724 seguidores
Pré-visualização50 páginas
world authority. Later, the regionals 
[such as the present NATO, SEATO, and the Organization of American States] 
can be brought all the way into a single world dictatorship of the proletariat.2 
For those who may be puzzled at why the Communists are concerned over raising the level of 
underdeveloped countries, it should be noted that this not only helps to "bring all nations together into 
a single world system of economy," but also serves to bleed dry the capitalist countries that will be 
paying the bill. In addition there is the fact that underdeveloped countries are more difficult for the 
Communists to take over than the more advanced ones. This will undoubtedly come as quite a shock 
to those who have been told that our massive giveaway program to foreign countries is keeping the 
Communists at bay. But, as Nikolai Lenin explained to his comrades: 
 
The more backward the country . . . the more difficult it is for her to pass from the 
old capitalist relations to socialist relations. To the tasks of destruction are added 
new, incredibly difficult tasks, vis. organizational tasks . . . the organization of 
accounting, of the control of large enterprises, the transformation of the whole of 
the state economic mechanism into a single huge machine, into an economic 
organization that will work in such a way as to enable hundreds of millions of 
people to be guided by a single plan.3 
 
In 1928 and again in 1936 the Communist International formally presented a three-stage plan for 
achieving world government: 
 
1. Socialize the economies of all nations. 
2. Bring about regional unions of various groupings of these socialized nations. 
3. Amalgamate all of these regional groupings into a final worldwide union of 
socialist states. 
 
The following is taken directly from the official 1936 program of the Communist International: 
 
Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different 
countries or groups of countries, after which the proletariat republics would unite 
on federal lines with those already in existence, and this system of federal unions 
would expand . . . at length forming the World Union of Socialist Soviet 
Republics.4 
 
The blueprint was further developed by William Z. Foster, national chairman of the Communist Party, 
U.S.A., from 1933 to 1957, when he wrote: 
 
A Communist world will be a unified, organized world. The economic system will 
be one great organization, based upon the principle of planning now dawning in 
the USSR. The American Soviet government will be an important section in this 
world government. . . . 
Once the power of the bourgeoisie is broken internationally and its States 
destroyed, the world Soviet Union will develop towards a scientific administration 
of things, as Engels describes. There will be no place for the present narrow 
patriotism, the bigoted nationalist chauvinism that serves so well the Capitalist 
warmakers.5 
 
By 1945 the blueprint was being drafted into its final form. Delegates from countries all over the world 
were preparing to participate in a conference at San Francisco which was to mark the creation of 
something to be called the United Nations. Earl Browder, well known past leader of the United States 
Communist party, in his book Victory and After, stated: "The American Communists worked 
energetically and tirelessly to lay the foundations for the United Nations, which we were sure would 
come into existence." The April 1945 issue of the Communist periodical Political Affairs explained to 
its readers the importance of getting the capitalist countries committed to this international body. It 
pointed out that since Russia would be one of the dominant voices in the UN, it could be used to 
prevent other countries from acting independently against Communism. The magazine stated: 
 
Victory means more than the military defeat of Nazi Germany. It means the 
collapse of anti-Soviet policies and programs as dominant tendencies within the 
capitalist sector of the world. It means that the policy predominant during the 
interwar years of attempting to solve the world crisis at the expense of the Soviet 
Union is replaced by the policy of attempting to solve the crisis through 
cooperation with the Soviet Union.6 [Italics added.] 
 
Five months later the Communists printed a pamphlet entitled The United Nations which further 
explained what function they had in mind for the United Nations. To be sure, it was not the function of 
"peace" that Americans anticipated. The pamphlet said: "It [the San Francisco conference] met to 
outlaw war. But everyone knows that war cannot be abolished until imperialism [i.e. capitalism] is 
abolished." It went on to explain that there were four primary reasons why Communists should 
support the United Nations: 
 
1. The veto will protect the USSR from the rest of the world. 
2. The UN will frustrate an effective foreign policy of the major capitalist 
countries. 
3. The UN will be an extremely helpful instrument in breaking up the colonial 
territories of non-Communist countries. 
4. The UN will eventually bring about the amalgamation of all nations into a 
single Soviet svstem.7 
 
In 1953 Colonel Jan Bukar, a former Czechoslovakian army intelligence officer, testified before the 
House Committee on Un-American Activities that a General Bondarenko delivered a lecture at the 
Frunze Military Academy in Moscow and declared: 
 
From the rostrum of the United Nations, we shall convince the colonial and semi-
colonial people to liberate themselves and to spread the Communist theory over 
all the world. We recognize the UN as no authority over the Soviet Union, but the 
United Nations serves to deflect the capitalists and warmongers in the Western 
World.8 
 
One final and extremely revealing glimpse of the blueprint was offered by Dr. Marek Stanislaw 
Korowicz, a member of the United Nations delegation from Communist Poland who defected in 1953 
and sought political asylum in this country. Testifying before the House Committee on Un-American 
Activities, Dr. Korowicz said: 
 
We were all indoctrinated strongly with the Russian master plan to reach the 
working masses of the various countries in the Western World over the heads of 
their governments. . . . The organization of the UN is considered as one of the 
most important platforms for Soviet propaganda in the world. I wish to underline 
the following comment: Not only Russia, but its satellites attach a primary 
importance that the members of their bloc of satellite powers maintain their 
 
relations with the Western World. It is emphasized at all times that, in the acts of 
real democracy, socialist democracy, they should seek a direct channel over the 
heads of their governments to the great popular masses of the U.S. and the 
other western countries. The UN organization offers a parliamentary platform to 
the Soviet politicians, and from this platform, they may preach to the populations 
of the entire world and do their subversive propaganda.9 
It is no mere coincidence that the United Nations headquarters was located in the United States. 
Most Americans think that this was a victory for us in the cold war. Nothing could be further from the 
truth. Not only has this made it much easier for the Communists in the United Nations to "reach 
directly to the American masses" with their propaganda, but their spies and espionage agents posing 
as delegates and staff can gain entry into this country under full diplomatic immunity. Matt Cvetic, 
former undercover agent for the FBI, has testified that 
 
. . . representatives of the Soviet bloc governments in the UN do not only operate 
as propaganda ministers in the UN, but also, whenever possible, carry on in this 
country to further the revolutionary aims of the Communist International