Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Numerical Determination of Frequency Guard Band Resonances for Chipless RFID Tags Gilberto T. Santos-Souza, Andreia Ap. de C. Alves, Leonardo L. Bravo-Roger, Member, IEEE Telecommunication Division School of Technology University of Campinas - UNICAMP Limeira - SP, Brazil g081491@dac.unicamp.br, a116142@dac.unicamp.br, leobravo@ft.unicamp.br Abstract-This paper presents a numerical study to show the frequency guard band effect in the design of spiral resonators coupled in son microstrip line for encoding Chipless RFID Tags in S-band. Simulations in the software HFSS version 15.0 were performed in this study. Keywords-Chipless RFID Tag, Resonator, Frequency Guard Band I. INTRODUCTION In the Chipless RFID Tags systems, the resonators are responsible for encoding data, where each resonator represents one bit. The function of these resonators is creating a low impedance path through 50n microstrip line, the resonator and the ground, when it works on its resonance frequency, creating a short-band effect on this frequency due to its internal resistance. The inductances [1] and capacitances [2] of the resonator are the parameters that define its resonance frequency by (1): 1 fr = 2rr.JIT (1) Basically, these resonant frequencies are tuned by changing the resonator's length. The increase of the resonator's length will be also increasing the inductance and capacitance, lowering the resonant frequency. In the literature is possible to find several Chip less RFID Tags technologies [3-6], but there are not studies of frequency guard band for cascaded resonators. To avoid reading errors, each resonator should resonate or not in the frequency for which it is designed. For reasons of limited spectrum, it is desirable that the resonant frequencies of the resonators are close, this is, larger number of bits in the same band. However, adjacent resonators can resonate in the same frequency resulting in read errors from the ID Tag. At S-band, typically each resonator occupies 20MHz of bandwidth, approximately. This paper shows how to design a six bits Chipless RFID Tag in the substrate Taconic TLX-O (Er = 2.45, tan 0 = 0.0019 and h = 0.87mm) with a frequency guard band that avoids interference in the resonances. This study can be also used for other binary classifications of Chipless RFID Tags in the S-band. Department of Microwaves and Optics (DMO), School of Electrical and Computer Enginnering (FEEC), University of Camp in as (UNICAMP). Hugo E. Hernandez-Figueroa, Senior Member, IEEE Departament of Microwaves and Optics (DMO) 13083-970, Campinas-SP, Brazil hugo@dmo.fee.unicamp.br II. DESIGN OF CHIPLESS RIFD TAG Fig. 1 illustrates the parameters construction of the spiral resonator. The design of the Chipless RFID Tag is shown on Fig. 2, where Ll, L2, L3, L4, Ls and L6 are the different lengths of the resonators to tune its resonance at different frequencies, respectively. This tag is classic in the literature and your in depth study can be found in [3]. Jw .... 1 I' • ... Fig. 1. Spiral resonator: Dgap spiral = O.3mm, Wspiral = O.8mm, W = 2.26mm and Dgap reed = O.4mm, [3]. Fig. 2. HFSS model for six bits Chipless RFTD Tag. III. RESULTS To simplify the results analysis, the Tag's antennas are removed from the simulation model and replaced by ports that feed the RF transmission line. Table I shows the resonators's lengths values in millimeters (mm) for two different designs. TABLE I. LENGTH PARAMETERS OF THE RESONATORS TN MILIMETERS PROJECTS Ll L2 L3 L4 L5 1 10,1 9,7 9,1 8,7 8,4 2 11 10,2 9,4 8,7 8 L6 8,1 7,5 In Project 1 [3], there are resonant frequencies very close to adjacent resonators. The Project 2 shows a case where the resonances are separated by appropriates frequency guard bands. The six resonances obtained in the Project 1 when multiresonator is excited with a frequencies sweep in S-band are shown in Fig. 3. Analyzing the second and third resonances (correspond ing to the resonator length L2 and L3), it is observed a separation of only 78MHz between their central resonance frequencies (worse case). Figs. 4 to 9 show the magnetic distribution field of the multiresonator when it is energized with the resonances frequencies of the resonators length Ll (1.996GHz), L2 (2.076GHz), L3 (2.154GHz), L4 (2.294GHz), Ls (2.408GHz) and L6 (2.502GHz), respectively. It is clearly observed that the resonance occurs in expected resonator and also in the adjacent resonator (except L3 because it has a frequency guard band relatively large with respect to L4) at each frequency and absorbing energy from the line, which could cause a reading error in the Tag code. -2.00 '" �3.25 � -4.50 -5.75 Freq[GHz] Fig. 3. Project 1: Six bits Chipless RFlD Tag resonances. Fig. 4. Resonance error of Project 1 at 1. 996GHz. Fig. 5. Resonance error of Project I at 2. 076GHz. Fig. 6. Resonance of Project I at 2. I 54GHz. Fig. 7. Resonance error of Project I at 2.294GHz. Fig. 8. Resonance error of Project 1 at 2.408GHz. Fig. 9. Resonance of Project I at 2.502GHz. Obviously a solution for this problem is to increase the frequency guard band between adjacent resonances. However, excessive separation is unacceptable due to restrictions on spectrwn use. This paper proposes an attainment of appropriate values for frequency guard bands in the design of this type of Tags in S-band using nwnerical simulations. The simulations corresponding to multiresonator in the Project 2 are shown in Fig. 10. XYPIot 1 0.00 -::r-�-==-'-��---r��������������---rc""", -1.00 -2.00 �3.oo � !g-4.oo -5.00 -6.00 Fig. 10. Project 2: Six bits Chipless RFTD Tag resonances. The Fig. 10 shows a better distribution of the resonances within the S-band, wherein the lowest frequency guard band resonances now occurs between the lengths of the resonators L1 and L2, with a value of l62MHz. The Fig. 11 to 16 show the magnetic distribution field when exciting the Tag with the resonant frequency of the resonators length L1 (1.8lGHz), L2 (1.972GHz), L3 (2.l48GHz), L4 (2.334GHz), L5 (2.S02GHz) and L6 (2.702GHz), respectively. Using this frequency guard band of at least l62MHz there is no resonance in the adjacent resonators. Fig. II. Resonance of Project 2 at 1.810Hz. Fig. 12. Resonance of Project 2 at 1. 9720Hz. Fig. 13. Resonance of Project 2 at 2. I 480Hz. Fig. 14. Resonance of Project 2 at 2.3340Hz. Fig. 15. Resonance of Project 2 at 2.5020Hz. Fig. 16. Resonance of Project 2 at 2.7020Hz. IV. CONCLUSION In the Chip less RFID systems, adjacent resonances are intolerable, because the coding is set through the tag's hardware, as well, since the tag is constructed, its ID may not be modified. To avoiding spurious resonances that could cause errors when reading the tag's ID, is necessary to establish a minimum frequency guard band value between the resonances for each type of Chipless RFID Tag.enabling to accommodate the largest possible number of bits in the tag's band operation. REFERENCES [I] Z. Hejazi, P. S. Excell, Z. Jiang, "Accurate distributed inductance of spiral resonators", IEEE Microwave and Ouided Wave Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp: 164-166, April 1998. [2] Z. Jiang, P. S. Excell, Z. M. Hejazi, "Calculation of distributed capacitance of spiral resonators",IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 45, no. I, pp: 139-142, January 1997. [3] S. Preradovic; N. C.Karmakar. "Multi resonator-Based Chipless RFTD, Barcode of the Future" Springer (2012). [4] Y. F. Weng, et al. "Design of Chip less UWB RFID System using a CPW Multi-Resonator", IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 55, no. I, pp.13-31, March 2013. [5] M. S. Bhuiyan, A. Azad, N. Karmakar. "Dual-band Modified Complementary Split Ring Resonator (MCSRR) Based Multi-resonator Circuit for Chipless RFTD Tag", Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, IEEE Eighth International Conference, pp. 277-281, April 2013. [6] S. Preradovic; N. C.Karmakar. "Chipless RFTD for Intelligent Traffic Information System", Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), IEEE International Symposium, pp. 992-995, July 2011.
Compartilhar