Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Gondwana Research, 1.! 5, No. I , pp. 175-196. 0 2002 International Association for Gondwana Research, Japan. ISSN: 1342-937X Main Stages of the Development of the Sedimentary Basins of South America and their Relationship with the Tectonics of Supercontinents Benjamim Bley de Brito Neves lnstituto de GeociFnczas-Universidade de SGo Paulo, Rua do Lago, 562.05508-900, SGo Paulo SP, Brazil, E-mail: bbleybn@usp.br (Maniusrript received December 20,2000; accrpted May 30,2003) Abstract Twelve main stages of sedimentary basms of the South American Platform have been identified as follows: one Neoarchean, seven Proterozoic and four Phanerozoic. Basin-forming tectonics are related to the accretionhsion and fission of the major continental landmasses of the Earth’s history, such as Atlantica, Nena, Rodinia, GondwandPannotia and Pangea. The first proposed stage of basin development precedes the formation of these major landmasses and was developed on Mesoarchean microcontinents. ‘The last stage succeeds the fission of Pangea and is still in progress. Key words: Supercontinent, fusion, fission, cratonic sequences, basin-forming tectonics. Introduction During specific stages in geological time continental masses drew close to each other, accreted and later separated, and today we are in an intermediate stage between the last accretion (Pangea) and the next future supercontinent. The South American platform contains sedimentary basins from the Neoarchaean to the present and is remarkable for the excellent preservation of the lithostratigraphic records of Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic basins. This paper analyses the approximately 12 major phases of sedimentary basin formation and deformational tectonics, as postulated by Kingston et al. (1983). Locations are shown in the index map (Fig. 1) and in the subsequent figures. Previous Work Studies of basin evolution have usually discussed paleogeography and tectonic development, but they are seldom related to the interaction of lithosphere plates on a global scale. Examples of good studies of the Precambrian are the works of Amaral (1974, 1984), Almeida and Hasui (1984), Costa and Hasui (1991) in the Amazonian region and Dominguez (1993, 1996) in the S5o Francisco cratonic region of central-eastern Brazil. For the Phanerozoic, the studies have leaned mostly towards the concept of sedimentary sequences (Almeida, 1967, 1969; Soares et al., 1974, 1978; Sloss, 1988; Almeida et al., 2000). Most of these early studies were based on Rb/ Sr and WAr data, and they suffered from the lack of adequate geochronological information. Many correlations of Precambrian sequences now require extensive revision in the light of new data obtained by those more advanced methods (U/Pb and Pb/Pb in zircons, etc.). For the Phanerozoic there exists an impressive amount of data of a multi-disciplinary nature that has been objectively used in the more recent syntheses. The original sketches ofAlmeida (1969) and Soares et al. (1974,1978) were confirmed in essence and improved. Recent syntheses were published by Milani and Zalan (1999) for the large basins of the continental interior (‘IS’ or syneclises, Kingston et al., 1983) and by Cainelli and Mohriak (1999) for the coastal basins. For the evolution of continental masses, classical works include those by Gower et al. (1990), Sengor (1990), Hoffman (1991), Rogers (1996), Unrug (1996), Dalziel (1997) and others. Some Pr- and Necessary Observations The South American platform can be divided into the pre-Brasiliano Northern and Northwestern area (11, and Gondwana Research 176 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES 80"W - 40"s \ - 'a h l 6 0 " W 40"w Pata onia I I Fig. 1. General situation index map. Main of geographic features of South America. The main Brasiliano cratonic domains are shown in light gray: N-NW-Amazonian, N-NE-S. Luis, E-S. Francisco, SE-Lds Alves, S-Rio de La Plata. the Brasiliano Central and Central-Eastern area (2). The Brasiliano Orogenic Cycle (present in area 2) is as significant to South America as the Hercynian to Eurasia and the middle Paleoproterozoic orogenic cycles to North America. Brasiliano areas include Archaean, Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic rocks that have been variably reworked from moderate to deep levels, and the effects of previous events are masked in many areas. Pre-Brasiliano structures are the cratonic nuclei of the Brasiliano network. In their interior they show well- preserved lithostructural evidence of older orogenic cycles, although they contain local structures and isotope data caused by Brasiliano events. These nuclei preserve several Proterozoic basins, many of which have been partially transformed into mobile belts, whereas some others show only gentle to moderate deformation. Gondwana Research, V 5, No. 2,2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 177 The best information about sedimentation and tectonics is generally available from the central-eastern region of the continent in the Sao Francisco Craton and adjacent areas. In the Amazonian region, Proterozoic sequences are known only at reconnaissance scale, although these pre-Brasiliano rocks cover a large area of the northern part of the continent. Especially in this Amazonian region there is a notable trend of Precambrian younging of the basement units, cover sequences and Proterozoic anorogenic granitic plutonism (1.88 Ga to 0.99 Ga) from northeast to the southwest (Brito Neves et al., 1984). Pre-Atlantica Stages 1 and 2 (Older than 2.0 Ga) Neoarchaean Aguas CZaras basin (stage I) Formation and coalescence of microcontinental cells started at about 3.5 Ga, increasing in number and size and covering a large area of South America by the end of the Neoarchaean. This maximum of terrane formation and dockage at ca. 2.75 Ga is known as the 'Jequie Cycle' in Bahia and/or the 'Rio da Velhas Event' in Minas Gerais. During these early processes of lithosphere plate interaction, sedimentary basins developed in settings such 51ow as fore arc, back arc and post-orqgenic collapse, all of which are today represented by Low-Grade Terranes (LGT) of the greenstone-belt type. Most of these areas are highly deformed basement older than sedimentary cover, but one relatively undeformed unit is still preserved in the central part of the Serra dos Carajas (southeastern Amazonia) (Fig. 2). This Bacia de Aguas Claras Formation consists of up to 1500 m of siliciclastic rocks that developed on a marine platform grading to littoral and fluvial deposits (Nogueira et al., 1995). They rest discordantly on the Archaean Gr2o Par6 and Igarapk Ipojuca Groups in horst-graben structures in the interior of a positive flower structure of the major regional shear zones. The lower member of this unit contains mostly pelitic beds (including manganese ores), siltstone and fine-grained sandstone units interpreted as having been deposited on a marine platform. The upper member consists of fine-grained and coarse-grained sandstone of intertidal and fluvial (braided) origin with well-developed facies variations (Nogueira et al., 1995). From field relationships and isotope data, Mougeot et al. (1992) suggested that this basin was older than 2700 Ma, making it the oldest well preserved sedimentary sequence deposited under stable conditions on the South American Platform. 50"W 50"W Fig. 2. The Aguas Claras Formation in the interior of Serra do Carajis Range. It corresponds to Stage 1 as the oldest (Archaean) sedimentary basin of South America. From Nogueira et al. (1995). Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 178 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES Paleoproterozoic basins (stage 2) Development of sedimentary basins acceleratedfollowing the coalescence of the Neoarchaean microcontinental cells. Their stratigraphic position and zircon-bearing clasts dated at 2.15 Ga in some of the uppermost lithostratigraphic units show that they both preceded and followed global orogenic events, principally the Siderian (2.5-2.3 Ga), Rhyacian (2.3-2.05 Ga) and Orosirian (2.05-1.8 Ga). These basins developed during the first major continental (or supercontinental) collages, for example the Atlantica Supercontinent of Rogers (1996). Basins developed during this stage contain a predominance of fluvial siliciclastic shallow marine deposits with minor volcanism, with clasts derived from Archaean greenstone belt sequences, plutons and magmatic arcs. They also contain banded iron formation, carbonate beds, jaspilite associated with Fe-Mn and gold- and uranium-bearing conglomerate with occurrences of detrital pyrite. At Jacobina (central Bahia), the sedimentary pile attains a preserved thickness of 5000 m of very mature sediments. This continued deposition under stable shelf conditions coexisted side by side with distinct development of basins more typical of the Archean, such as volcano-sedimentary basins with ‘greenstone belt’ suites (Serrinha in Bahia, Barama- Mazaruni/Vila Nova in the northeast of Amazonia, etc.). Only locally can it be shown that these platform basins discordantly overlie the Paleoproterozoic greenstone belt sequences (North Guyana Trough, the Orapu-Bonidoro Group, discordant over the Barama Mazaruni; Ledru et al., 1994). The tectonic environments of these basins varied from passive continental margin type (Minas Group, Marginal Syneclise, ‘MS’), foreland zones (Northern Guyana, Francevillian), interior rifts (Jacobina, Interior Fracture, ‘IF’), continental interior syneclises (Colomi, ‘IS’), rifts developed over rising mantle plumes (Upper Contendas sequence) and pull-apart basins, etc. (A syneclise is a broad basin of deposition; ‘MS’, ‘IF’ and related terms are from the classification of Kingston et al., 1983.) The deformational tectonics also varied widely but were nearly always subsidiary to the accretionary, collisional, and transpressive orogens that led to continental assembly at the end of the Paleoproterozoic and were responsible for the general arrangement of the Atlantica Supercontinent. Deformation of the basins is generally very intense and locally consists of refolding and tectonic imbrication with the subjacent rock units (Archaean magmatic arcs and greenstone belts). Only very rarely was the deformation moderate and the general features of Proterozoic basins preserved. The Formation of Atlantica Supercontinent and Subsequent Processes (Prelude to Stage 3) The continental mass Atlantica consisted of blocks that now occur in South America and Africa (Ledru et al., 1994; Rogers, 1996). I t formed gradually during several Paleoproterozoic orogenic stages (2.35 Ga, 2.2-2.15 Ga, 2.0 Ga, 1.95-1.80 Ga). The first event following accretion was widespread silicic magmatism and minor sediments of the Uatumii Group. Magmatism of the Uatumg Group (Supergroup, Association, etc.) is found in practically all countries in the northern part of the continent over an area > 1,500,000 km2 from eastern Colombia to Suriname. It consisted mostly of felsic volcanic rocks (Iricoum6- Surumu-Iriri, Cuchivero, Burro-Burro, Kuyuwini, etc.) and associated granitoid plutons. The Uatumii flows and pyroclastic rocks range from trachyte to andesite with minor basalt and show both calc-alkaline and alkaline trends. Pyroclastic rocks include tuff, breccia and agglomerate, ignimbrite, tuffaceous sandstone beds, microbreccia etc. The Uatumii event occurred during the Orosirian orogenies that affected most of the world (but with few representatives from South America). Their rock units are generally older than 1.8 Ga, with dates mostly between 1.97 and 1.85 Ga (Tassinari and Macambira, 1999). They succeeded important orogenic events from 2.2 to 2.0 Ga (Maroni-Itacaiunas/Transamazonian) and were nearly coeval with orogenic protesses in the Ventuari-Tapaj6s Belt that completed the formation of Atlantica (Tassinari and Macambira, 1999). They occurred mostly in old and thick Archaean basement inliers that form the Pakaraima block (north of the Amazonas River) and the Xingu block (to the south, in the Xingu River, see Figs. 1, 3 and 4). The Uatumii Event shows a close relationship (‘the day after’) to the formation of the Atlantica Supercontinent and is an important precursor to the subsequent tectono- sedimentary development of the Amazonian block in Late Paleoproterozoic times (stage 3). It may have resulted from sublithosphere events (activated mantle, underplating, plumes, etc.) or passive events (activated lithosphere) related to plate interaction elsewhere. The former may have occurred as a consequence of thickening and crustal growth associated with the oldest (Maroni- Itacaiunas) Paleoproterozoic orogenic events. The latter may be attributed to accretionary orogeny in adjacent regions, as exemplified by the rocks of the Ventuari-Tapaj6s region that occur along a NNW-SSE-trending belt about 2200 km long in the central-western part of the Central Amazonian Block. A phase of extensional tectonics Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 179 associated with these events was suggested by Montalviio and Bezerra (1980) and Costa et al. (1991), the latter estimating values up to 2.5 for the 'beta' factor for crustal extension. Late Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic (Stages 3 to 6) Roraima stage (Urupi-Gorotire-Beneficente, stage 3) The Uatumii Event was immediately followed by the development of intracratonic sedimentary basins with local thicknesses up to 3,000 m. They formed from the upper Orosirian (ca. 2.0 Ga) to the Statherian (ca. 1.8 Ga) during thermal relaxation and isostatic adjustments continuing from Uatumii time. Reis and Carvalho (1996) estimated a minimum period of 100 Ma for the deposition of the whole sequence. On the Guyana Shield (Fig. 31, these sediments cover a nearly continuous area of about 73,000 km2, with remnants in Venezuela (Neblina, Duida, Paru, Sipapo, Roraima), Amazonas (Ufaranda, Surucucus, 68' 64" 2" 0= 68" Tepequem, Urutamin, UrupVPittinga, etc.) and Suriname (Tafelberg). On the Central Brazil Shield, equivalent sediments are erosional remnants of a former basin in the Rio Xingu area as well as in the Alto Tapajos Basin (Teles Pires-Juruena and Aripuang rivers; Fig. 4). Deposits consist mainly of continental clastic rocks, subordinate shallow marine sediments and some volcanic rocks at a few stratigraphic levels. Sediments overlie the Uatum5 volcanics and contain Uatumii clasts both at the base and at several other stratigraphic levels. Basic intrusive rocks (Avanavero/Pedras, Pretas/Crepori) commonly formed at the end of sedimentation, indicating the beginning of new tectonics of the Statherian period (stage 4). The Roraima Supergroup is one of the best known suites and probably formed in several different basins (Reis and Carvalho, 1996). The main areas of exposure contain a sequence of continental clastic sediments (Arai Fm.) that were followed by two transgressive-regressive episodes (Suapi Group), passing upward to shallow marine sediments with some continental volcanic rocks, and terminated by continental and intertidal deposits. 60' 56' Amazonas _ _ _ _ . .---- 64" 60' 56" Fig. 3. Roraima (s.1) and Urupi occurrences in the Guyana Shield, north of the Amazonian Craton (light gray). In black is the Avanavero/Pedras Pretas Suite (Statherian mafic magmatism). After Reis and Carvalho (1996).Gondwana Research, V 5, No. 1,2002 60 " 56' 52 " 0 A rc he an T er ra ne s n Pa le op ro te m zo ic be lts Vo lc an ic tr ap > 1 .8 G a G ra ni tic ro ck s/ M af ii m ag m at ism B en ek en te l G or ot ire c ov er Pr os pe ra n@ A ca ri co ve r U nd f Ph an em zo ic co ve rs Fi g. 4 . T he C en tr al B ra zi l S hi el d, s ou th o f th e A m az on ia n C ra to n, w ith e m ph as is o n th e Pa le o- M es op ro te ro zo ic c ov er s. B f- B en ef ic en te , C q- C ub en cr an qu bm , G o- G or ot ire , D d- D ar da ne lo s, C b- C ai ab is , A -P -A ca ri- Pr os pe ra nq a. B as ed o n Sc ho bb en ha us e t a l. (1 98 4) . Gondwana Research, K 5, No. 1,2002 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 181 Both the Roraima Supergroup and other units of this tectonic stage formed during positive to moderate inversion of the preceding (Uatum6) extensional phase. Deposits formed in rifts (local fault zones), syneclises (open folds) and horizontal tablelands (‘dalas’, Montalvgo and Bezerra, 1980). Deformation occurred only along linear fault zones that delimit the blocks and contain cataclastic rocks. No compressional shortening occurred even where intrusive rocks cut or are adjacent to the sediments. These intrusions are Statherian or younger and consist of granitic, basic, and alkaline rocks formed mainly in an anorogenic environment with the exception of a few orogenic intrusives on the easternmost margin of the Rio Negro-Juruena Belt. Accentuated dips in some areas developed in the upper middle part of the Mesoproterozoic, during the so-called ‘K mudku Episode’ (‘Nickerian’ or ‘Orinoquense’) . This deformation may have been caused by 1.3-1.1-Ga Grenville orogenies (sensu lato) in the southwestern region of Amazonia. According to Fraga et al. (1994) this late tectonic activity (with E-W to WNW-ESE trends) may locally have been strong enough to cause metamorphic foliation and lineation in the Roraima Supergroup and its substrate in addition to some tectonic imbrication south of the Roraima area. The stratigraphic succession, field relationships and tectonics of the Urupi Formation (Fig 3) are very similar to those of the Roraima Supergroup (Daoud and Fuck, 1987). The Urupi Formation contains a larger amount of immature clastic sediments and pyroclastics than the Roraima Supergroup, and the unconformity with the underlying Uatum6 suite may represent a longer period of erosion. Rocks similar to the Urupi Formation occur farther south along the tributaries of the Xingu, Iriri and Tapaj6s rivers (Fig. 4), where tablelands of the Gorotire Group are exposed as remnants of box-folds. They consist of subaerial rocks in sequences less than 800 m thick that rest discordantly on Uatum6 and older suites. These sediments were formed mostly in unstable cratonic environments, and throughout the sequence they consist mainly of quartzo-feldspathic sandstone beds containing rock fragments, poorly sorted sandstones and abundant oligomictic and polymictic conglomerates. Shale and fine- grained clastic sediments are rare. The sediments are intruded by basic magmas of the Statherian Crepori Formation (‘Avanavero’ magmatism) and are locally overlain discordantly by sandstone beds of the Cubencranquem Formation. The Beneficiente Group (Fig. 4) in the Alto Tapajos Basin (Juruena and Teles Pires rivers) is considered to be the stratigraphic and structural equivalent of the Gorotire Group although it contains a thicker marine sequence (Schobbenhaus et al., 1984). It consists of white quartz- sandstone and light-grey to dark-grey siltstone, with minor beds of argillite, limestone and dolomite in a section more than 750 m thick. It occurs along a NNW-SSE trend, parallel to the Rio Negro-Juruena accretionary system and may have been deposited in an extensional back-arc basin (Tassinari and Macambira, 1999). The basin is outlined by fault lines and contains domal structures resulting from the emplacement of granite and alkaline plutons in the Upper Proterozoic and Mesoproterozoic. The Beneficiente Group is overlain locally by Upper Paleozoic sedimentary remnants (reason for the name ‘Alto Tapajos Basin’). Taken as a whole, rocks of this stage represent a widespread first stage of sedimentary and volcanosedimentary covers of Atlantica, well recorded in this part of the Amazonian pre-Brasiliano domain. It continued into, and may have overlapped, deposition of similar suites in other regions of Atlantica. Statherian Taphrogenesis (Pre-Nena), fission of Atlantica (stage 4) Ubiquitous Statherian taphrogenesis (1.8-1.6 Ga; Brito Neves et al., 1995a; Magini et al., 1999) followed the fission of Atlantica and preceded the formation of NENA (Northern Europe-North America supercontinent; Gower et al., 1990). It is particularly well recorded in South America and represents a transition from accumulation of Roraima-type sediments in platforms and extensional troughs to the development of younger Mesoproterozoic basins. It delimited, and was responsible for, development of most of the Mesoproterozoic basins, and by fracturing the Archean and Paleoproterozoic basement it set the lines along which the Neoproterozoic cratons and mobile belts subsequently developed. Statherian extension is well shown by magmatism. Mafic intrusives (dyke swarms and sills) occur from northern Venezuela (Avanavero, Roraima Intrusive Suite, Crepori, Pedra Preta) southward to northern Uruguay (Florida) and Argentina (Tandil) and westward from Atlantic coastal areas (Salvador, Rio Pardo) to the interior of Bolivia (Fig. 5, Fig. 6). It includes mafic-ultramafic bodies, anorogenic granite plutons (Amazonian region, Minas Gerais, Bahia, Rio de la Plata craton) and volcanic (trap) rocks. Although mostly extensional, Statherian activity included some local deformation of Roraima-age basins in the Amazonian region. It had an important role in basin- forming tectonics in the Amazonian region, in Bahia and Minas Gerais (Espinhaqo range), in the Borbsrema Province (Western Potiguar and Jaguaribeano fold belts) and in many other regions in South America and parts of Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 182 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES Fig. 5. 'The Statherian Taphrogenesis in the South American continent, a general overview. The Statherian occurrences include mafic dyke-swarms, felsic volcanic traps, volcano-sedimentary rifts (and locally some rapakivi granites). See text. Africa and North America. Some Statherian and slightly younger supracrustal rocks were later folded in the Mesoproterozoic and Neoproterozoic (Mantiqueira Setentrional and Central, Jaguaribeano, Eastern Tocantins, etc.), where they occur in the interior of the Brasiliano mobile belts (underling Neoproterozoic rock units). Accretionary orogenic processes may have been synchronous with Statherian extension in the Rio Negro- Juruena belt (westwards of the Alto Tapajos Basin), in the Jauru area (Mato Grosso, southwestern Amazonia), and other areas. Some mafic rocks in the Espinhaqo range (Serro, Minas Gerais) may be remnants of a Statherian oceanic crust. Post-Nena Mesoproterozoic basins. (stage 5). Poorly known lower to middle parts of Mesoproterozoic basins containintracratonic clastic and locally volcanoclastic sequences that overlie the areas affected by Statherian extension and orogeny in the northern part of South America, the southern part of North America and Fennoscandia. In the central-eastern part of South America they occur in Statherian rifts locally expanded to form syneclises (GoiAs-Tocantins, Arai and Natividade groups) and in Bahia and Minas Gerais (Espinhaqo, Chapada Diamantina) (see Fig. 6). A well preserved lithostratigraphy shows increasing occurrence of epicontinental marine invasions upward in the sequences. Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 183 0 150 300km - Fig. 6. Paleoproterozoic (to Mesoproterozoic) rifts in the central-eastern part of Brazil. The outline of the S6o Francisco Craton (Neoproterozoic in age) is shown only for reference. Exact ages can only be inferred but are probably in the time interval 1.6/1.55 Ga to > 1.2 Ga. In Amazonia (Fig. 4) the centers of subsidence and sedimentation migrated progressively westward (west of Alto Tapaj6s Basin) toward domains of younger thermal age (1.8-1.6 Ga) in the Rio Negro-Juruena orogen. Local volcanoclastic rocks and sub-greywacke contain fragments of volcanic rocks and chert. At least two zones of alkaline basalt (Arinos Formation) are intercalated with arkosic sandstone in the Caiabis Graben. Gabbro and diabase intrusions have poorly defined WAr ages of 1.4 Ga (lowest level) and 1.2 Ga (Ectasian age). In the WNW- Central-western region of Amazonia Mesoproterozoic deposits in the central and western part of Amazonia (Fig. 4) extend from the right margin of the Rio Madeira, along the upper course of the Rio Juruena (tablelands of Dardanelos and Caiabis) through the northern part of the Amazonas Basin to the confluence of the Branco river with the Negro river. They display a NNW-SSE trend following the Rio Negro-Juruena accretionary belt that forms the regional basement Sections thicker than 1000 m occur in the Prosperanqa/ Acari and Prainha units (Caputo, 1971). On the Caiabis and Dardanelos tablelands, clastic sediments are mainly arkosic, medium to coarse-grained, and micaceous, with thin beds of polymictic conglomerate. ESE-striking Juruena-Teles Pires structural high, preliminary Rb/Sr data suggest that small subcircular intrusives of alkali-syenite, trachyte, and quartz-syenite (Canamg) are the same age. The eastern part of the Amazonian region contains erosional remnants of the Cubencranqukm Group in box folds along the upper courses of the Iriri and Xingu rivers (Fig. 4). Sequences are not more than 300 m thick over a wide area underlain by older sedimentary cover, volcanic traps and high-grade rocks of the regional basement. At one place the Cubencranqugm sequence overlies a 1.64-Ga anorogenic granite, and the basal unit consists of beds of polymictic conglomerate with pebbles of Uatumii volcanic rocks and sandstone (possibly Gorotire). Most of the rocks are reddish arkosic sandstones with Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 2,2002 184 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES immature medium-grained sediments intercalated with siltstone and subordinate argillite. Some lithic greywacke, volcanic breccia and ash-tuff occurs in the middle part of the sequence. The open folds of the Cubencranqukm are discordant with the deformed Gorotire suite beneath it. The Prosperanqa-Acari Formation crosses the Amazonas River along an inverted Proterozoic syneclise that evolved into the Paleozoic Purus Arch (see also Fig. 11) between the Solim6es and Mkdio Amazonas basins. The deposits lie discordantly over the sedimentary and volcanic sequences of the previous stages (Caputo, 1971). The Prosperanqa suite consists mostly of brown to reddish beds of micaceous, medium to fine-grained, arkosic sandstone with clay fragments that are massive or display crossbedding or parallel stratification. Subordinate beds are siltstone, shale and oligomictic conglomerate with pebbles of quartzite and rhyolite. Prosperanqa sediments grade upward to fine-grained clastic units, calcareous siltstones and carbonate of the Acari Formation. deposited in fluvial (braided) to coastal marine environments. Some beds were intruded by the Bacaba Diabase (1290 Ma; Teixeira, 1983) during the Ectasian (Iwanuch, 1999), but some of the diabase is Upper Paleozoic The complete extent of Mesoproterozoic sedimentation and volcanism is unclear. Mesoproterozoic (Caliminian, Ectasian) suites are well preserved only on the interior of lithosphere segments that acted as cratonic domains during the Brasiliano, and they are commonly deformed within the Neoproterozoic Brasiliano belts. Thus it is possible that Mesoproterozoic suites extended farther to WESTERN ----.--------(- MARGINAL ZONE the west in Rondonia and Mato Grosso, where several rock units were involved in the Guapork and Aguapei orogenies. Sedimentation may also have occurred farther to the south, covered by the large Cenozoic sedimentary basin of the upper course of the Juruena river (Fig. 4). In central Brazil, west of the large mafic-ultramafic massifs of GoiAs-Tocantins, there is evidence for rifting informally referred to as the Ectasian taphrogenesis (preliminary studies by Correia and Pinho, 2000). Also, farther to the south and southeast, Ectasian volcano-sedimentary rocks have been reported in the central part of the Mantiqueira Province (Juliani et al., 2000), which is now in the interior of a Brasiliano fold belt. Bahia and Minas Gerais Mesoproterozoic basins in Bahia and Minas Gerais contain well exposed sequences generally thicker than 3000 m that cover an area of 150,000 km (Fig. 6). They follow Statherian tectonic trends (and lithostratigraphic precursors) and are best exposed in Brasiliano cratonic domains. The oldest sediments are Caliminian, but no dates are available for end of sedimentation. Rock assemblages grade upward from eolian and fluvial sediments, through transitional environments (Paraguaqu, Galho do Miguel groups), to carbonate shelf and tidal deposits (Dominguez, 1993; Martins-Neto, 1998). The basins connected with the sea and show periodic incursions of fluvial sediments in incised valleys and estuarine deposits (Chapada Diamantina/Gentio and Conselheiro Mata groups). The sediments also connect CENTRALZONE + t-------. EASTERN MARGINAL ZONE @ Fig. 7. Cross-section of the Aguapei aulacogen, Brazil and Bolivia. After Saes (1999) Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 185 in the subsurface with basins in Goias (Romero Silva and Zalhn, 2000). Suites in Bahia show a moderate degree of deformation by convergence of the basement blocks (‘oroaulacogen’), which caused development of N-S axial plane foliation in pelite beds, but it is not known whether this is an overprint of older deformation (‘Espinhaqo Orogeny’) or a consequence of the Brasiliano cycle. Pre-Rodinia Stage (Stage 6) Westward growth of the Amazonian Block and the development of Proterozoic cover left a well-preserved record along the Brazil-Bolivia border (Figs. 7 and 8). Rifts developed during the lowest part of the Stenian (1.20 to 1.1 Ga) over the Proterozoic orogenic belts, which were divided by Van Schmus et al. (1998) into the Jauru, Araputanga, Cabacal belts (ca. 1.75 Ga), Santa Helena 90 13‘ 65‘ belt (ca. 1.45 Ga) and Santo Ignacio belt (ca. 1.36 Ga). Greater extension in the north created an oceanic basin (Nova BrasilAndia-Guapore; Scandolara, 1999; Fig. 8). Although most suites were deformed during the upper part of the Stenian (Sunsas-Grenville), a few scattered areas in the southwestern part.of theAmazon region were only moderately folded. In Rondonia a continental margin developed after the rift stage, evolving to open-ocean deposition of terrigenous psammo-pelitic turbidite beds with subordinate plutonic and volcanic tholeiitic rocks. Subsequent transpression of these rocks at ca. 1.15-1.0 Ga developed the Guapore fold belt containing mesozonal metamorphites cut by intrusive rocks and discordantly covered by sediments of Stage 7 (Scandolara, 1999; Rizzotto et al., 1999). South of the Guapore mobile belt the Aguapei-Sunsas branching rifts (in Mato Grosso) showed variable rates of 62’ Paleo-Mesozoic cover Meso-Neoproterozoic basins Younger granites of Rondonia Nova Brasilandia belt Undifferentiated basement SL = S%o LourenGo PN = Pacads Novos UP = Uopione I 100krn I Fig. 8. Guapork-Nova Brasildiidia fold belt (late Mesoproterozoic in age) and the system of rifts of Rondbnia, southwest Amazonian Craton. Modified after Scandolara and Amorim (1999). Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 186 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES ~ ~~~ extension insufficient to develop an ocean. Saes (1999) grouped sedimentation into three depositional phases in a deep central zone from S2o Vicente to Santo Corazon and two marginal shallow rift zones (Fig. 7). The rift phase consists of psammite and psephite deposited only in the depocenters. The subsequent syneclise phase covered the maximum area of subsidence with fine- grained clastic sediments deposited on coastal plains and low-energy shallow-marine environments. Fluvial and eolian sediments predominate in the uppermost phase of tectonic inversion. Deformation and greenschist-facies metamorphism is significant only in the central zones of tight folds and decreases toward external zones, which contain subhorizontal or gently folded suites that form tablelands. Local subhorizontal displacement of tabular quartzitic masses overlying the basement occurs in the southernmost part of the system of rifts. At present Stenian cover is well known only on the Amazonian Craton, but it may also include undated suites in central Brazil (Parano6 and similar units) and in the central-eastern region of Brazil (upper units of the Chapada Diamantina). It may also have been developed in the Borborema Province of northeastern Brazil, but any vestiges have been destroyed by the intense Cariris Velhos orogeny at ca. 0.96 Ga, which left rocks mainly at mesozonal levels, and by Neoproterozoic tectonic- magmatic events. Post-Rodinia Palmeiral Stage (Stage 7) Palmeiral deposits constitute the best record of sedimentation immediately after the incorporation of South American area in Rodinia. They may have been deposited in part of a very broad Mesoproterozoic/ Neoproterozoic syneclise formed by post-orogenic thermal contraction of the Guapor6 belt (Scandolara and Amorim, 1999; Pedreira and Bahia, 2000). Their subsequent segmentation into rift-type compartments (inversion of regimes) may have been part of the worldwide ‘Tonian’ taphrogenetic event that led to the break-up of Rodinia. Generalized extension with adjustments along previous lines of structural weakness followed the Guaporb/Nova Brasilindia orogeny in the Neo-Estenian. It formed graben-like structures that now preserve erosional remnants of the formerly widespread Palmeiral Formation The Sao Lourenco Graben (Fig. 8) has oligomictic conglomerate near the base of the sequence but consists mostly of fine-grained orthoquartzitic to feldspathic sandstone beds with light colors, parallel lamination, and intercalations of siltstone and argillite. The sequence is similar in the Pacaas Novos Graben, with many more beds of arkosic sandstone and evidence of crossbedding. The Uopianes Graben contains immature sediments, with several conglomeratic zones intercalated with arkosic sandstone in addition to volcanoclastic rocks with ash- tuff and crystal-tuff. Smaller grabens in the surrounding areas contain similar sequences. A major part of this stage of sedimentation may be overlain by the sediments of the Solimdes Syneclise and/or by the ‘Dala Cisandina’ (the Cenozoic plains of the eastern side of the Andean Chain). Magmatism can be attributed to the same extensional regime at the end of the Mesoproterozoic and the beginning of the Neoproterozoic. Granitic suites studied by Bettencourt et al. (1999) include Santa Clara (ca. 1081+ 50 Ma), Costa Marques and the Younger Granites of Rondonia (ca. 998-991 Ma). The Nova Floresta Suite (in Paca6s Novos graben, Fig. 8) of gabbro, troctolite and diabase intrudes the Palmeiral Formation plus alkaline basalt flows. There are some K-Ar ages from 1098 Ma to 967 Ma for the diabases. Diachronic Dispersion (Fission) of Rodinia The break-up of Rodinia was responsible for the development of widespread Neoproterozoic sedimentary and volcanosedimentary domains, many of which have since been transformed into mobile belts. In South America it appears to have occurred in three phases between 1.1 Ga and 0.63 Ga. The first phase at the beginning of the Tonian (ca. 1050 to ca. 900 Ma) is shown mostly by basic magmatism (dyke swarms, basalt flows) in the Amazonian region (Nova Floresta and other areas), in the central eastern region of Brazil, along the Atlantic coast and sparsely in Africa. Granitic and alkaline anorogenic magmatism also occurred in western Amazonia. Subduction in the central-western region of Brazil (Mara Rosa Arc, ca. 930 Ma) and possibly in the south of Brazil (Passinho Event, ca. 850 Ma) are the oldest evidence for Neoproterozoic oceanic domains after the breakup of Rodinia and plate interactions, these being the first stages of the Brasiliano collage. The second phase of taphrogenesis in South America appears to have been widespread during the middle of the Neoproterozoic (ca. 800-700 Ma; early part of stage 8). Local rifting varied from one province to another and ended with the formation of large continental and oceanic basins. This phase was initially accompanied by glaciation commonly correlated with worldwide Sturtian events, and a number of interior basins and rift basins have basal diamictite beds grading laterally to shelf (QPC = quartzite, pelite and carbonate) and turbidite sequences, as well as other units of deeper marine environments. This widespread phase of opening was contemporaneous with Gondwana Research, K 5, No. 1,2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 187 Neoproterozoic oceanic and related environments A/D= RokelidelGoianides; B=Pharusian; C=Peri-franciscan E = Adamastor; F = Arabian-Nubian(ANEKT) Neoproterozoic continental lithospheric segments ~ a (The sons of Rodinia) Areas with different geological problems (Sedimentary cover, deep crustal reworking, etc) convergence in other areas, such as the formation of arcs in southern Brazil (Mantiqueira Province) and collision in the central-western region of Brazil (Tocantins Province). The third phase of the break-up of Rodinia began in South America at the start of Neoproterozoic 111 (later part of stage 8; pre- to syn-Vendian; 640 to 620 Ma; Boggiani, 1997). The main stratigraphic records of this last phase are present in the Paraguai (base of the Fig. 9. Sketch diagram for the main Neoproterozoic oceanic basins (and connected realms) of western Gondwana (A, B, C, D, E, F). Main continental segments in gray: AM-Amazonian, SL-WA-S. Luis-West Africa, PR-Parnaiba, SFCKA-S. Francisco-Congo-Angola, KH-Kalahari, PP- Paranapanema, LA-Luis Alves, RP-Rio de la Plata, PA-Pampia; AA-Arequipa. Corumbd, Urucum, and Jacadigo groups) and Western Pampean belts (Puncoviscan rift). Varangerian glaciation is well preserved in the ParaguaiBelt (Puga and Jangada formations). This final phase was contemporaneous with the main phases of the Brasiliano/Pan-African orogeny, with the development of magmatic arcs and collisional belts in most of the structural provinces of South America (between 640 and 610 Ma). This synchrony shows that the break-up of one supercontinent (Rodinia) Gondzuana Reseauch, V. 5, No. 1,2002 188 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES overlapped the amalgamation of another (Gondwand Pannotia). Dispersion in South America (and western part of Gondwana) created at least four main domains/systems that led to the development of continental margins and oceanic realms: the Goianides-Rokelides, Pharusian, circum-Siio Francisco-Congo and Adamastor (Fig. 9; Brito Neves et al., 1999). They formed a complex network of oceanic basins, gulfs and small oceanic basins, and they were connected by continental basins (rifts, rift systems and aulacogens). Pre-Gondwana-Pannotia Stage (Stage 8) The first (Tonian) phase of taphrogenesis during the breakup of Rodinia is known only (up to now) by the presence of magmatic rocks. The sediments formed during the succeeding two phases are described here as Stage 8. Events during initial accretion of Gondwana/Pannotia are discussed below as Stage 9. The second and third stages are here described in terms of four rock suites. They include: ‘QPC’- Quartzite, Pelite, carbonate; ‘BVAC’- Bimodal Volcanic Rocks, Arkose, Conglomerate; ‘Greenstones’ - tholeiitic volcanics predominating over sediments and ophiolitic remnants of oceanic environments (see ‘Proterozoic Rock Association’ in Condie, 1989) The fourth rock suite is formed by volcanic and plutonic suites of magmatic arcs. The QPC sequences are found along nearly all margins of large lithosphere segments formed by the break-up of Rodinia (Amazonia, Siio Francisco-Congo, West Africa, Paranapanema, Curitiba-Luis Alves, etc.; Fig. 9). These continental, coastal and shelf sequences can be described as ‘marginal’ or ‘proximal’ belts. They are commonly underlain by diarnictite, varvite and other glacial sediments deposited mainly, but not exclusively, in the Cryogenian Period (Sturtian). They occur in Marginal Syneclises (MS), on carbonate shelves, in aulacogens, and in large syneclises of the continental interior. The QPC sequences grade laterally to turbidite beds and deep-water sediments in several mobile belts, some of which include dismembered ophiolitic sequences. Lateral variations to BVAC suites have been interpreted as transitions to continental rift systems. The proportions of volcanic rocks and their composition (calc-alkaline, tholeiitic) are very variable, and their environments remain open to discussion. The glaciations that preceded the QPC sequences were widespread, and their erosion of the interior of the continental landmasses facilitated subsequent marine invasions after 750 Ma both in South America and Africa. In South America, these rock suites occur overlying the Amazonic craton (Alto Paraguai Group) and in the SZio Francisco Peninsula/craton (Siio Francisco Supergroup), and in the Rio de La Plata Block (Tandilia). In the S2o Francisco peninsula, the Neoproterozoic rocks were responsible for almost complete submersion, with only a few Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic basement islands exposed. In Africa these marine invasions are recorded in many basins, such as Taoudeni in West Africa, Lindian, West Congo, Damaran and Kundelungu in the southern part of the Congo Craton. Brasiliano distal basins contain only a poorly understood record of magmatic arcs and oceanic rocks, including submarine basalts, mid-ocean ridge volcanics and accretionary prisms. Fragments of oceanic suites are present in all structural Brasiliano provinces of South America, but no complete ophiolitic sequence has been found. Magmatic arcs began at ca. 930 Ma (Arenopolis/ Mara Rosa, Tocantins Province) and continued at later times during the Neoproterozoic and Cambrian (ca. 880 Ma, ca. 750-700 Ma, 640-600 Ma, 580-550 Ma, 533-520 Ma, 520-500 Ma.). Neoproterozoic deformation was responsible for the closure of oceanic basins and connected paleogeographic systems worldwide, reaching its climax in the accretion of Gondwana-Pannotia. In South America, the Brasiliano collage completed the assembly and divided the continent into two areas: 1) an area of pre-Brasiliano structures mainly in the northern-northwest of South America and along the Andean substrate and 2) an area containing four Brasiliano structural provinces in the eastern half of the continent (Almeida et al., 198l) , as previously mentioned. Brasiliano tectonogenesis was strong and widespread (affecting the fold belts and their basement) and these processes affected many areas so intensely that it is locally difficult to discriminate between Brasiliano and pre-Brasiliano terranes. Brasiliano processes were specifically most intense in basement (fold belts) with Mesoproterozoic thermal ages than in older rocks. Marginal belts with QPC sequences in both South America and Africa show decreasing structural deformation and degree of metamorphism toward the interior of the cratons. This process is well shown in the S2o Francisco Peninsula, where the stratigraphic suites and structures around the pear-shaped periphery of the craton show orthogonal trends in different segments. Late Brasiliano Transition (Stage 9) A wide variety of basin-forming tectonics occurred during late Brasiliano time from the north (NW of the State of Cear6) to Uruguay in the south. The interiors of Brasiliano belts contain intradeeps, successor basins and Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1, 2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 189 "Transition stage" accu rren ce s Paran3 syneclise Dam Feliciano is)/ Ribeira belt (ld) LUIS Pdves cratonrc block Major faults MC 1 300 km Fig. 10a. Early Paleozoic basins/occurrences (late Brasiliano) of southern Brazil- Mantiqueira Province. MG - Minas Gerais, SP - SHo Paulo, PR - ParanA, SC - Santa Catarina, RS - Rio Grande do Sul, 1 - Eleuterio, 2 - Pouso Alegre, 3 - Pic0 do Itapeva, 4 - Cajamar, 5 - Salto de Pirapora, 6 - Pirapora do Bom Jesus, 7 - Samambaia, 8 - Quatis, 9 - Castro, 10 - Camarinha, 11 - Ervalzinho, 12 - Guaratubinha, 13 - Campo Alegre/Corupa, 14 - Itajai, 15 - CamaquH. Modified from Moro (2000) transitional environments. Marginal zones at the peripheries of the Neoproterozoic plates contain foreland and backland domains, and the far interiors of these plates contain impactogenic basins and intracontinental wrench basins. Despite this difference in environments, remnants of late Brasiliano basins contain very similar sedimentary and volcanosedimentary rocks and structures. In most basins the area of preserved rocks is much smaller than the original area of deposition, and today the only remnants are those preserved in troughs or protected from erosion by local tectonics and by Paleozoic covers. For this reason the more extensive occurrences lie on the basement of Proterozoic syneclises (see Fig. 10a and l o b ) along depositional sites that later became depocenters throughout the Paleozoic. Numerous widely spaced remnants of Stage 9 occur on the shield areas of Borborema (Brito Neves et al., 1995b), Mantiqueira, and a few in Tocantins Province. The exposures are commonly too small to determine the original type of basin, and although the simple designation 'molasse' basins is frequently applied, the term is inadequate because the rocks clearly formed in most of the tectonic varieties of basins described above. Because of their lithological similarities, their association with the final phases of the Brasilianoorogeny, and the overlying Ordovician and Siluro-Devonian cover, Almeida (1969) used these suites to define a 'transition stage' between Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 4 2 "W P os t - S il u ri a n P h a n e ro zo ic c o ve r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4- 5 C o m b ro - O d o v ic ia n " B a si n s" . cr o p p in g 34 "W o u t o cc u re n ce s A s a b o v e -b e lo w th e P a rn a ib a b a si n N e o p ro te ro zo ic cr a to n ic co ve rs m E S Me so - N e a p ro te ro zo ic ( B ra si li a n o ) fo ld b e lt s o M a rg in a l (Q P C s e q u e n ce s) b In te ri o r (v o lc a n ic - se d im e n to ry ) G n e is s - M ig m a ti ti c m a ss if s (P a le o p ro te ro zo ic a n d A rc h e a n ), re w o rk e d d u ri n g t h e B ra si li a n o Si r0 F ra n ci sc o C ra to n H G T + L G T M a in sh e a r la n e s E @ - JA IB A R A S @ - JA G U A R A P I @ - C O C O C I/ R IO J U C A @ - S R A IM U N D O N O N A T O @ - C O R R E N T E S @ - IA R A @ - B A R R A D O D O M IN G O S @ - JU A @ - P A LM A R E S @ - s JU LI AO @ - S E R R A D O C A G A D O 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 k m - Fi g. l ob . E ar ly P al eo zo ic (l at e B ra si lia no ) b as in s/ oc cu rr en ce s of N or th ea st er n B ra zi l/ B or bo re m a P ro vi nc e. 1 - Ja ib ar as , 2 - Ja gu ar ap i, 3 - C oc oc i / R io Ju cB , 4 - SB o Ju lif io , 5 - SH o R ai m un do N on at o, 6 - Ia ra , 7 - B ar ra d o D om in go s, 8 - Ju a, 9 - P al m ar es , 1 0 - S er ra d o C ag ad o. Gondwana Research, K 5, No. 1,2002 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 191 the Brasiliano orogenies (unstable stage) and the subsequent phase of platform cover (post-Ordovician stable stage). Soares et al. (1978) suggested that these units represent the first (alpha) cratonic sequence (sensu Sloss, 1988) of the platform cover. Basin formation follows the diachrony of the orogenic events discussed above. Most of the rocks have isotopic ages concentrated around the Proterozoic-Cambrian boundary (ca. 540 Ma), but they range from Neoproterozoic I11 (605 Ma; Guaratubinha Rhyolite; Basei et al., 1998) up to the beginning of the Ordovician (ca. 480 Ma; Pimentel et al., 1996). Contemporaneous with these stages of basin-forming tectonics are many extensional events over all of South America. They include mafic and ultramafic magmatism along the axis of the Amazonian Syneclise, mafic dyke swarms in the central-southern region of Amazonia and in the northern part of the S2o Francisco Craton, plus many occurrences of felsic dykes, hydrothermal veins and pegmatites. Sediments of QPC assemblages predominate in the foredeeps (Alto Paraguai, Lagarto-Palmares, Itajai, Camaquii; see Figs. 10a and lob), where some of the lowest stratigraphic units are coeval with those of the marginal fold belt. Over these QPC sediments are coarse- grained fluvial-clastic units derived from the erosion of the fold belts, grading to siltstone and beds of lacustrine pelite. Many of the basins of this transition stage are associated with widely spaced transcurrent faults, indicating the importance of escape tectonics in all structural provinces. Some basins in southern Brasil (Guaratubinha, Campo Alegre, Corupa; Fig. 10a) contain variegated coarse- grained clastic sediments and felsic volcanic rocks associated with late-orogenic alkaline plutons. Similar sedimentary rocks without associated magmatic rocks are present in intradeep basins bounded by fault lines and in grabens associated with extension and collapse in the interior of fold belts such as Ju6, Serra do C6gado in the Sergipano Belt of the Borborema Province, and the Apiai belt (Camarinha basin). Outcrop thicknesses are up to about 3000 m, but thicker sequences probably occur in those parts of the basins underlying syneclises. At the same time (ca. 590 Ma) a diversified sedimentary-volcanic-plutonic association along the ‘Serra do Mar’ range (southeastern Brazil) may have resulted from impactogenic tectonics caused by collisions and microcollisions of Brasiliano terranes and arcs in southeastern Brazil, from Santa Catarina to S2o Paulo ( e g , Curitiba and Luis Alves blocks, Paranagud and Pien arcs, etc., Citroni, 1998; Basei et al., 1998). Other basins on the periphery of mobile belts, such as Castro (Parana) and Camaquz (Rio Grande do Sul), in southern Brazil, have commonly been described as foredeeps, but other authors have attributed their origin to rifting caused by (late-Brailiano) thermal contraction. Paleozoic Gondwanan Syneclises (Stage 10) The sedimentary cover developed on Western Gondwana covers an area exceeding 3,200,000 km z. In South America it is mainly preserved in six large syneclises (Acre, Solimdes, Amazonas, Parnaiba, ParanB and Chaco- Parana; Fig. 1 l), but smaller deposits occur in Mesozoic rifts of the continental interior and coastal regions as well as in Patagonia and the sub-Andean Zone. These large intracratonic basins (‘IS’, Kingston et al., 1983) resulted from extension in response to the thermal contraction of the continental lithosphere after the Brasiliano-Pan- African Cycle, during which the geothermal gradients were considerably elevated (Brito Neves et al., 1984). Africa contains a number of basins with similar Paleozoic covers (Ghana, Taoudeni, Angola-Oyambo- Barotse, Kalahari, Zambeze, Luano, Karoo, etc.). These syneclises are generally elliptical and have areas between 500,000 km and 1,200,000 km 2, with thicknesses of sediments in the depocenters up to 7000 m. Some basins were connected during their evolution. There is a good recent syntheses by Milani and Zalan (1999) about these syneclises that emphasizes petroleum accumulation. Sediments of Stage 10 were deposited after the accretion of Gondwana. Deposition in the Chaco-Paran6 and Solimdes basins began in the Lower and Middle Ordovician, but most sequences range from post-Middle Ordovician to Eo-Triassic. The basins underwent a polyphase evolution with some local deformation from the time of Pangea assembly (ca. 230 Ma), at the climax of the Hercynian orogeny, and during its break-up (especially from 225 to100 Ma). Sediments are locally deformed on the edges of the South American Platform by Hercynian movements along western (pre-Andean) fold belts on the Pacific margin and the southernmost (Ventana-Cape belt/ SAMFRAU) margin of the platform (Almeida et al., 2000). The shape of South American syneclises commonlyshows a heritage of the Brasiliano framework (Brito Neves et al., 1984). Deeper troughs contain sequences associated with the late Brasiliano transition stage (stage 9; above), and along some sections they display a general steerhead (koilogen) configuration. Soares et al. (1978) and Almeida et al. (2000) proposed that the infilling of the syneclises shows many general similarities with the successive deposition of three widespread cratonic sequences (sensu Sloss). Silurian- Gondwana Research, K 5, No. 1,2002 192 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES 72' 52" 32' u Paleozoic synedises Interior Paleo-Mesozoic and Tertiaiy nfls Other Cenozoic Basins 1 GANDARELA 2 FONSECA MIDDLE JAGUARIBE t I E Q U A COASTAL (I) EOUATORIAL (11) CENTRAL (Ill) SOUTHERN ATLANTIC , L ARCHES A - lquitos 10 S JOSCBELMONTE WESTOF 16 AGUA BONITA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 0 U . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . ; @ E R E - Purus C - Monte Alegre D - Gurupa E - Tocantins F - Guam& G - Ferrer IUrbano Santos H - S o Francisco I -AltoXingu J -Alto Paranaiba K - Assuncibn L - Ponta Grossa M - Rio Grande Fig. 11. Main Phanerozoic sedimentary basins of Brazil. Adapted from Schobbenhaus et al. (1984). Devonian sequences (beta) and Eo-Carboniferous (gamma) sequences consist of mature marine sediments with chrono-parallel beds developed under humid to glacial conditions. The late-Carboniferous to Triassic sequence (delta) records several glacial episodes, progressive aridity with time, marine regression and ultimately deposition of continental sediments containing red beds. All basins were completely restructured both internally and externally (beginning in the Permian in the north of the continent) mostly during the Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous. New conditions included development of linear uplift zones (arcs), intrusion by diabase dikes, sills and plugs and by eruption of widespread lavas, particularly in the Parani Basin. Sedimentation was restricted to fluvial and eolian deposits (sequence epsilon). These processes were diachronous from one part to another of the continent and are tectonically related both to the accretion of Pangaea, which was completed at ca. 230+5 Ma (Veevers, 1989), and partly to its contemporaneous break-up from 225 Ma onwards. The Triassic is marked by a major interruption of sedimentation almost everywhere (except southern Brazil), which emphasizes the Paleozoic (post-Ordovician/Lower Triassic) character of the Gondwanan syneclises. Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMEFUCA IN RELATION ‘ro SUPERCONTINENTS 193 The Activation Stage (Stage 11) The Atlantic Ocean began to form when new basins were created and old ones were restructured along the newly forming continental margin and the interior of South America (Chang et al., 1991; Cainelli and Mohriak, 1999; Matos, 2000). Three oceanic segments (Equatorial, Central and Southern), separated by structural highs, opened in well-defined phases from the Upper Jurassic to the Quaternary. Three distinct rift phases from the Volgian to the Barremian developed grabens, semigrabens and rifts that were filled by fluvio-deltaic sediments of the ‘continental megasequence’. Brasiliano trends greatly influenced the outlines of these grabens on the central and southern continental margin and in the continental interior (Brito Neves et al., 1984). Thermal relaxation that followed rifting initiated deposition of a ‘transitional megasequence’ (Aptian) that includes black shale and evaporite deposits southward from the state of Alagoas. This assemblage provides important sources and structures for accumulation of oil. The subsequent stage of drift produced a ‘marine megasequence’ subdivided into a lower (Albian to Turonian) carbonate shelf and an upper siliciclastic suite deposited under open marine conditions from the uppermost Cretaceous to the Quaternary. In the continental interior, besides the complete restructuring of the syneclises, siliciclastic sedimentation occurred because of the formation of new rift systems, deepening of older depocenters and intensification of some linear zones of uplift (arcs). This led to the fragmentation of a large part of the original Paleozoic cover, which was eroded and in part preserved in interior and coastal rifts. Some of these interior rifts (Tucano, Jatoba, Araripe; Fig. 11) contain sections that include sediments of the transition stage (stage 9), Gondwanan syneclises stage (stage 10) and the rift and transitional suites (stage 11) formed during the opening of the Atlantic Ocean. Basaltic magmatism was an important part of stage 11. The Serra Geral flood basalt of the Parana Basin covers more than 1,000,000 km and was extruded mostly in the Lower Cretaceous, with a climax between the Valanginian and Hauterivian. Basaltic magmatism also occurred in all syneclises, in some coastal basins and also as far as the central-western region of Brazil about 2500 km from the coastal basins (in Anari and Tapirapuh, RondBnia and Mato Grosso). However, basalt flows are rare in many rifts in the interior of the continent. Soares et al. (1978) designated the entire stratigraphic pile of stage 11 as a cratonic sequence (epsilon). This grouping is not advisable because of the diversity of rocks (sedimentary and igneous) and tectonic environments during this stage 11 Post-Pangea Restabilization (Stage 12) A new tectono-sedimentary phase for all parts of South America began in the Upper Cretaceous. Continental separation and thermal contraction associated with basaltic magmatism caused a new phase of syneclise formation that created basins filled with fluvial and fluvio- lacustrine sediments and local eolian deposits. The siliciclastic deposits overlie all vestiges of previous rifts and are deepest in areas that underwent differential subsidence (Alter do Chiio Formation in Amazonas; Bauru Group in Paranh; Itapecuru Formation in Parnaiba; Urucuia Formation in the Siio Francisco Basin; etc.). These deposits prograded over an inter-regional discontinuity and reflect a new phase of tectonic stabilization (leading to orthoplatformal conditions) that succeeded the dramatic process of rifting and initial drift of the previous stage. The designation of a new cratonic sequence (Zeta sequence, Soares et al., 1978) is fairly reasonable. In almost all basins on the Atlantic continental margin new syneclises (‘MS’, Figueiredo and Raja-Gabaglia, 1986) formed over deposits of previous rift and drift phases. In continental areas of Brasiliano structural provinces and syn-Brasiliano cratonic domains, these new tectonic conditions led to a series of small rifts mainly filled with fluvial and lacustrine sediments. The number and distribution of these Cenozoic rift systems and the isolated centers of volcanism associated with some of them is not totally known yet. Significant data are only available for those rifts of southeastern Brazil (mainly Rio Paraiba do Sul, Rio Ribeira, Rio Iguaq6, Fonseca, Gandarela). Other rifts are being gradually identified as belonging to this phase of readjustment, and all of them show evidence for differential uplift in the interior of the plate (some of these rifts related to accretion along the Atlantic margin, and subduction along the Pacific margin). Preliminary data suggest that the South American plate had rates of continental uplift and Cenozoic volcanism less intense than in the African plate during this stage. Cenozoic sediments consist of fluvial and lacustrine beds (locally eolian) bothin local basins and in widespread tablelands east of the Andes. Regions of great stability with very low rates of subsidence cover large areas (in some places over millions of square kilometers) with sediments that prograded disconformably over deposits of all previous tectonic stages. They were unaffected by structures beneath the discontinuities. One example is the Amazonas lowlands, where the axis of the depocenter runs diagonally across the Amazonas syneclise in a NNE- Gondwana Research, I/: 5, No. 1,2002 194 B.B. BFUTO NEVES SSW direction for about 1500 km from RondGnia to Roraima (along the Branco River). Other examples include the basins of ‘Alto Xingu’, ‘Alto Araguaia’, the Pantanal, the lowlands of the middle course of the S2o Francisco River, and others in the far interior of the continent. In addition, the Dala Cisandina contains tabular marginal sediments of the eastern side of the Andes from Venezuela to Patagonia (Llanos, Beni, Chaco/ Pantanal, Pampas, see Fig. 1) and is connected to the plains of Amazonas, where some components of subsidence are derived from the isostatic adjustment of the Andean Chain. This entire suite has been included in the Zeta stratigraphic sequence, but modifications in this scheme are inescapable for the future with further investigations. References Almeida, F.F.M. de. (1967) Origem e evoluqiio da plataforma brasileira. Boletim DGM/DNPM 241, 36p. Almeida, F.F.M. de. (1969) Diferenciaqso tectanica da Plataforma Brasileira. In: 23th Congress0 Brasileiro de Geologia, Anais, Salvador-BA, pp. 29-46. Almeida, F.F.M. de. and Hasui, Y. (coord.) (1984) 0 Pre- Cambrian0 do Brasil. Edgard Blucher Ltda., Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil, 378p. Almeida, EEM. de., Hasui, Y, Brito Neves, B.B. de. and Fuck, R.A. (1981) Brazilian structural provinces: an introduction. Earth Sci. Rev., v. 17, pp. 1-19. Almeida, EEM. de., Brito Neves, B.B. de. and Carneiro, C.D.R. (2000) The origin and evolution of the South American Platform. Earth Sci. Rev., v. 50, pp. 77-111 Amaral, G. (1974) Geologia Pr6-cambriana da Regiiio AmazBnica. Livre-Dochcia thesis, Universidade de Siio Paulo, S. Paulo (unpub.), 212p. Amaral, G. (1984) Provincias Tapaj6s e Rio Branco. In: Almeida, F.F.M. and Hasui, Y. (Eds.), 0 PrKambriano do Brasil. Edgard Blucher Ltda., Sao Paulo-SP, pp. 6-35. Basei, M.A.S., Citroni, S. and Siga, Jr. 0. (1998) Stratigraphy and age of the Fini-Proterozoic Basins of Parana and Santa Catarina - southern Brazil. Boletim IG-USl? Serie Cientifica, Bettencourt, J., Tosdal, R.M., Leite, W.B. and Payolla, P.L. (1999) Mesoproterozoic rapakivi granites of the Rondonia Tin Province, southwestern border of the Amazonian Craton, Brazil. Reconnaissance U-Pb geochronology and regional implications. Precamb. Res., v. 95, pp. 41-67 Boggiani, P.C. (1997) An6lise Estratigrifica da Bacia Corumb6 (Neoproterozoico) - Mato Grosso do Sul. PhD thesis, Universidade de Siio Paulo, S. Paulo (unpub.), 181p. BritoNeves, B.B. de., Campos Neto, M.C. andFuck, R.A. (1999) From Rodinia to Western Gondwana: an approach to the Brasiliano-Pan-African Cycle and orogenic collage. Episodes, Brito Neves, B.B. de., Fuck, R.A., Cordani, U.G. and Thomaz Filho, A. (1984) Influence of basement structures on the evolution of the major sedimentary basins of Brazil: a case of tectonic heritage. J. Geodyn. v. 1, pp. 495-510. V. 29, pp. 195-216. V. 22, pp. 155-166. Brito Neves, B.B. de., S B , J.M., Nilson, A.A. and Botelho, N.F. (1995a) A Tafrogihese Estateriana nos blocos paleoproterozoicos d a America d o Sul e processos subsequentes. Geonomos., v. 3, pp. 1-21 Brito Neves, B.B. de., Van Schmus, W.R., Santos, E.J., Campos Neto, M.C.C. and Kozuch, M. (1995b) 0 Evento Cariris Velhos na Provincia Borborema. Integraqiio de dados, implicaqdes e perspectivas. Revista Brasileira de Geocihcias, Cainelli, C.C. and Mohriak, W.U. (1999) Some remarks on the evolution of sedimentary basins along Eastern Brazilian continental margin. Episodes, v. 22, pp. 206-216. Caputo, M.V. (1971) Formaqao Prosperanqa. Lithostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy of the Acari-Prosperanqa formations. Unpub. report, Petrobrh, Bel6m-PA. Chang, H.K., Kowsmann, R.O., Figueiredo, A.M.F. and Bender, A. (1992) Tectonics and stratigraphy of the East Brasil rift System: an overview. Tectonophys., v. 213, pp. 97-138. Citroni, S.B. (1998) Bacia de Campo Alegre-SC, aspectos petrol6gicos, estratigraficos e caracterizaqiio geotecthica. PhD thesis, Universidade de S2o Paulo, S. Paulo (unpub.), 185p. Condie, K. (1989) Plate tectonics and crustal evolution. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 476 p. Correia, C.T. and Pinho, EE.C. (2000) Mesoproterozoic orogenic systems in the Amazonian and Central Brazil. Conference in special symposium F-8, International Geological Congress, Rio de Janeiro (CD ROM, unpub.). Costa, J.B.S. and Hasui, Y. (1991) 0 quadro geral da evoluq5o tectbnica da AmazBnia. In: 3rd Simp6sio Nacional de Estudos Tectonicos, Rio Claro SP, Boletim de Resumos Expandidos, Costa, J.B.S., Reis, N.J. and Pessoa, M.R. (1991) Organizaqiio lito-estrutural do Proteroz6ico M6dio do extremo norte do Estado de Roraima. In: 3rd. Simp6sio de Geologia da Amazhia, Bel6m-PA, SBG Nucleo Norte, Anais, 179-193. Daoud, W.K. and Fuck, R.A. (1987) The stratigraphic position of the Proterozoic Urupi formation, Northern Brazil: a discussion. In: Final Meeting IGCP 204 - Precambrian Evolution of the Amazonian Region, CarajBs, Para, Brazil, Extended Abst., pp. 71-76 Dalziel, I. (1997) Neoproterozoic-Paleozoic geography and tectonics: reviews, hypotheses, environmental speculations. Geol. SOC. Amer. Bull., v. 109, pp. 16-42 Dominguez, J.M.L. (1993) As coberturas do Cr5ton do Siio Francisco: uma abordagem do ponto de vista de an5lise de bacias. In: Dominguez, J.M.L. and Misi, A. (Eds.), 0 Criton do Siio Francisco. Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia-N6cleo da Bahia/SGM/CNPq, Salvador-BA, pp. 137-160. Dominguez, J.M.L. (1996) As coberturas Plataformais do Proteroz6ico M6dio e Superior. In: Barbosa, J.S.F. and Dominguez, J.M.L. (coords.), Mapa Geol6gico do Estado da Bahia - Texto Explicativo. SICM/SGRM, Salvador-BA, Figueiredo, A.M.F. and Raja-Gabiglia, G.P. (1986) Sistema classificat6rio aplicado As bacias sedimentares brasileiras. Revista Brasileira de Geociencias, v. 16, pp. 350-369 Fraga, L.M., Reis, N.J. and Pinheiro, S.S. (1994) Arranjo estrutural do segment0 sul do bloco Pacaraima, Estado de Roraima. In : 4th Simpbio de Geologia da AmazBnia, Bel6m- PA, SBG N~c leo Norte, Anais, pp. 7-9. V. 25, pp. 279-296. pp. 142-145. pp. 103-125. Gondwana Research, K 5, No. 1, 2002 SEDIMENTARY BASINS OF SOUTH AMERICA IN RELATION TO SUPERCONTINENTS 195 Gower, C.F., Ryan, A.B. and Rivers, T. (1990) Mid-Proterozoic Laurentia-Baltica. Geol. Assoc. Can. Spl. Paper 38 ,307 p. Hoffman, P. (1991) Did the breakout of Laurentia turn Gondwana inside out? Science, v. 252, pp. 1405-1412. Iwanuch, W. (1999) EvoluqPo geol6gica com base em dados geocronol6gicos da porqPo sudeste do Estado do Amazonas e do trato contiguo do norte do Estado de Mato Grosso na regiPo do Baixo e Medio Rio Juruena. In: 6th Simp6sio de Geologia da Amazbnia, Manaus-AM, SBG Nucleo Norte. Boletim de Resumos Expandidos, pp. 467-470. Juliani, C., Hackspacher, P., Dantas, E.L. and Fetter, A.H. (2000) The Mesoproterozoic volcanic-sedimentary Serra do Itaberaba Group of the central Ribeira Belt, Sao Paulo State, Brazil: implication for the age of the overlying Sao Roque Group. Revista Brasileira de GeociSncias, v. 30, pp. 82-86. Kingston, D.A., Dishroon, C. and Williams, PA. (1983) Global basin classification system. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., Ledru, P., Johan, V., Milesi,J.P. and Tegyey, M. (1994) Markers of the last stages of the Paleoproterozoic collision: evidence for a 2 Ga continent involving circum-South Atlantic Provinces. Precamb. Res., v. 69, pp. 169-191. Magini, C., Santos, T.S., Brito Neves, B.B., Hackspacher, P.C., Van Schmus, W.R., Dantas, E.L. and Fetter, A.H. (1999) Statherian taphrogenesis in the Borborema Province, NE Brazil. In: 2nd South American Symposium on Isotopic Geology, Cordoba, Argentina, Actas, pp. 327-330. Martins-Neto, M.A. (1998) 0 Supergrupo Espinhaqo em Minas Gerais: registro d e uma bacia rifte-sag d o Paleo- mesoproterozoico. Revista Brasileira de Geociencias, v. 28, Matos, M.D.M. (2000) Tectonic evolution of the Equatorial South Atlantic. In: Atlantic Rift Continental Margins, Geophys. Monograph 115, pp. 331-354. Milani, E.J. and Zalan, PV. (1999) An outline of the geology and petroleum systems of the Paleozoic interior basins of south America. Episodes, v. 22, pp. 199-205. Montalvgo, R.M.G. and Bezerra, P.E. (1980) Geologia e tectonica da Plataforma (Craton) AmazBnica (Parte da AmazBnia Legal Brasileira). Revista Brasileira de Geociencias, v. 10, pp. 1-27. Moro, R.P.X. (2000) Proposta de origem, evoluqPo e contexto da Bacia da Formaq5o Camarinha, transiqPo Neoproteroz6ico- Eocambriano do Estado do Paran6. PhD thesis, Universidade de SPo Paulo, S. Paulo, SP (unpub.), 167p. Mougeot, R., Respaut, J.P., Briqueu, L., Ledru, P., Milesi, J.P. and Macambira, M.J.B. (1992) Geochronological constrains for the age of the Aguas Claras Formation (Caraj6s Province, Pad , Brazil). In 39th Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Salvador -BA, Resumos Expandidos, v. 6, pp. 579-581. Nogueira, A.C.R., Truckenbrodt, W. and Pinheiro, R.V.L. (1995) FormaqPo Aguas Claras, PrC-Cambrian0 da Serra dos Caraj6s: rediscriqgo e redefiniqgo litoestratigr6fica. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, skrie Cihc ias da Terra, v. 7, pp. 177-197. Pedreira, A.J. and Bahia, R.B.C. (2000) Sedimentary basins of Rondonia State: response to the geotectonic evolution of the Amazonic craton. Revista Brasileira de Geocitncias, Pimentel, M.M., Fuck, R.A. and Alvarenga, C.J.S. (1996) Post- Brasiliano (Pan-African) high-K magmatism in Central Brazil: V. 67, pp. 2175-2193. pp. 151-158. V. 30, pp. 473-476 the role of late Precambrian-early Paleozoic extension. Precamb. Res., v. 80, pp. 217-238. Reis, N.J. and Carvalho, AS. (1996) Coberturas sedimentares mesoproteroz6icas do Estado de Roraima - avaliaqPo e discussCo de seu mod0 de ocorr6ncia. Revista Brasileira de Geocitncias, v. 26, pp. 217-226. Rizzotto, G.J., Lima, E.E and Chemale, Jr. E (1999) AcrescFio continental no Esteniano no sudeste de Rondbnia. In: 6th Simposio de Geologia da Amazonia - Manaus - AM, SBG N6cleo Norte, Boletim de Resumos Expandidos, pp. 319-322. Rogers, J.J.W. (1996) A history of the continents in the past three billion years. J. Geol., v. 104, pp. 91-107. Romeiro-Silva, EC. and Zalan, P. V. (2000) Sao Francisco Basin- geology and geophysics as a prospective Proterozoic frontier area in Brazil. Conference in Special Symposium H-4, International Geological Congress, Rio de Janeiro (CD ROM, unpub.). Saes, G.S. (1999) EvoluqPo tectbnica e paleogeogr6fica do aulac6geno Aguapei (1.2-1.0 Ga) e dos terrenos de seu embasamento na porqiio sul do Craton Amazbnico. PhD thesis, Universidade de SPo Paulo, S. Paulo (unpub.), 180p. Scandolara, J. (1999) A EvoluqPo Proter6zoica de Rondbnia, principais eventos e cronologia dos movimentos tectonicos. In: 6th Simposio de Geologia da AmazBnia- Manaus-AM, SBG Nucleo Norte, Boletim de Resumos Expandidos, Scandolara, J. and Amorim, J. (1999) A Faixa Move1 GuaporC, sua definiqPo e inserqPo no contexto geotectonico do SW do Craton Amazbnico. In: 6th Simposio de Geologia da AmazBnia - Manaus-AM, SBG Nucleo Norte, Boletim de Resumos Expandidos, pp. 278-281. Schobbenhaus, C., Campos, D.A., Derze, G.R. and Asmus, H. E. (Eds.), (1984) Geologia do Brasil. Texto Explicativo do Mapa Geologico do Brasil e Area oceanica Adjacente incluindo Depositos Minerais, Escala 1/ 2 500 000. Departamento Nacional da Producao Mineral/DNPM, Brasilia, 501p. Sengor, A.M.C. (1990) Plate Tectonics and Orogenic Research after 25 years: A Tethyan perspective. Earth Sci. Rev., v. 27, Sloss, L.L. (1988) Forty years of sequence stratigraphy. Geol. SOC. Amer. Bull., v. 100, pp. 1661-1665 Soares, P.C., Landim, P.M.B. and Fulfaro, V.J. (1974) AvaliaqPo preliminar da evoluqPo geotectbnica das bacias intracratonicas brasileiras. In: 28th Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Anais, Porto Alegre-RS, v. 4, pp. 61-83. Soares, P.C., Landim, P.M.B. and Fulfaro, V.J. (1978) Tectonic cycles and sedimentary sequences in the Brazilian intracratonic basins. Geol. SOC. Amer. Bull., v. 89, Tassinari, C.C.G. and Macambira, M.J.B. (1999) Geochronologkal provinces of the Amazonian Craton. Episodes, v. 22 (3), Teixeira, W. (1983) SignificaqPo tectBnica do magmatismo anoroghico PrC-Cambrian0 basico e alcalino na Regiao AmazGnica. In: 30th Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia, Anais, Recife-PE, v. 1, pp. 491-505. Unrug, R. (1996) The assembly of Gondwanaland. Episodes, Van Schmus, W.R., Geraldes, M.C., Kozuch, M. and Teixeira, W. pp. 255-258. pp. 1-201. pp. 181-191. pp. 174-182 V. 19, pp. 11-20 Gondwana Research, V. 5, No. 1,2002 196 B.B. BRIT0 NEVES (1998) U/Pb and Sm/Nd constraints on the age and origin of Proterozoic crust in southwestern Mato Grosso: evidences for a 1450 magmatic arc in SW AmazBnia. In : 14th International Conference on Precambrian and Craton Tectonics, Our0 Preto-MG. (Absts.), pp. 112-115. Veevers, J.J. (1989) Middle/Late Triassic (230+ 5 Ma) singularity in stratigraphic and magmatic history of the Pangean heat anomaly. Geology, v. 17, pp. 784-787. Gondwana Research, K 5, No. 1,2002
Compartilhar