Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Types of questions Open Questions: these are framed to encourage an expansive response Example Advantages Disadvantages how…., who…, what…, when…, where…, describe…, explain…, in what way…, could you tell us about…., how did you apply your training to your work? • encourage the applicant to do most of the talking • may turn up unexpected areas to pursue • allows applicant to talk about topics in their own words • good for exploring opinions, attitudes and feelings • can be difficult to phrase succinctly • can leave the applicant floundering and unsure of the expected answer Closed Questions: these are framed to elicit yes/no answers Example Advantages Disadvantages do…, did…, can…, is…, are…, have…, will…, would… how long did you work there? • can be used to good effect to obtain or check specific, concise information • useful when you want to gain quick confirmation of basic facts • can be used to regain control from a talkative person • are useful for clarifying a vague response • can be used to direct the interview to specific areas or to introduce a more open question • too many closed questions can seem like an interrogation • can disadvantage shy or nervous candidates by not encouraging them to expand • not appropriate if you are trying to get the interviewee to talk in depth about their experience or attitudes Probing Questions: this type of question helps to get under the surface of an initial answer. Having got the interviewee talking, the interviewer can use probing questions to bring out more detail. While the same questions are asked of interviewees, the use of probing questions will vary according to the interviewee’s response. Example Advantages Disadvantages how, who, what, when, why, where, describe, explain, in what way • particularly useful for encouraging people to concentrate on specific points, for clarifying uncertainties, testing the validity of a more general response and seeking evidence • if overused, can leave the applicant unsure of the expected answer or feeling that they must have given an incorrect response Hypothetical Questions: these are questions that set up a possible situation or problem and ask the interviewee for a possible course of action Example Advantages Disadvantages “suppose we went ahead with this plan of action and it failed. How would you handle the situation?” • useful for checking theoretical knowledge • good for examining an applicant’s response to a situation where they would not have had the experience but may have the knowledge of how to deal with it • don’t reveal much of the interviewee’s actual experience • need to be carefully phrased to avoid confusing the interviewee and should be avoided if they involve explaining lots of background information before the interviewee can attempt a reply • tend to elicit text book answers • can be little correlation between what people say they would do and what they actually do in a given situation • internal applicants may have advantage if it is too situation or context specific Leading Questions: this type of question suggests the expected answer Example Disadvantages “Surely you didn’t agree with that?” “Of course, you would want to investigate further wouldn’t you?” • tend to reveal more about the interviewer than the interviewee because their effect is to encourage or possibly compel the interviewee to say what the interviewer wants to hear, rather than what the interviewee thinks • they are based on assumptions on the part of the interviewer Multiple Questions: these questions have two or more distinct parts, each requiring an answer Example Disadvantages “What do you think of this issue? Do you agree with it, and if not, why, and what other issues would you see as being relevant to this specific case?” • while some types of multiple questions may be useful for certain senior level jobs in testing cognitive skills, the panel must be very careful how they use them – they are generally not recommended • confuse interviewees • indicate a lack of clarity and planning on the part of the interviewer Heavily Prefaced Questions: this type of question gives so much background and scene-setting that it is hard for the candidate to work out what the question is Example Disadvantages “One of the many difficulties encountered by counter staff is harassment by members of the public when they are aggrieved by our policy regulations. This can have a profound effect on staff which is quite important too but which I won’t go into at the moment. Could you tell us something about how you think you might handle any supervision problems associated with this job, say, if one of your staff came to you about a problem such as feeling unable to cope?” • confuse interviewees • indicate a lack of clarity and planning on the part of the interviewer Trick Questions and Stress Tactics Disadvantages • reaction to stress in an interview is unlikely to predict reaction to stress on the job. A person may cope poorly with stress resulting from face-to-face confrontation in an interview but cope well with stress associated with a heavy workload • a stressful interview may lead to the loss of potentially good recruits because of the poor impression they gain of the interviewers or the organisation as a whole
Compartilhar