Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
The Origin of Electric Organs of Electrophorus electricus ' THOMAS SZABO Brain Research Institute, Depmtment of Anatomy and Department of Zoology, University o f California at Los Angeles ABSTRACT The electric organs (main, Sachs' and Hunter's) of a 23 cm and a 38 cm long Electrophorus electricus were studied by histological methods. The results were compared with 12 cm (Keynes, '61) and 140 cm (Couceiro and Ackermann, '48) specimens. Al l three electric organs originate from striated muscle fiber as indicated by the presence of a striated structure in the undeveloped electroplates. The three organs do not develop simultaneously but in succession: first Sachs' organ, then the main organ and finally Hunter's organ, with considerable overlap in time. In all three cases, the anterior extremity of the organ develops last. The classical notion that the main organ originates from the lateralis i m u s muscle is not supported by the present findings. Several histological studies have shown that electroplates, the elementary units of electric organs in fish, originate from mus- cle tissue. In Torpedo (Ogneff, 1897) and in Astroscopus (White, '18) the electro- plates develop from myoblasts, whereas in Raja (Engelmann, 1894), in Gym- narchus (Dahlgren, '14) and in mormyrids (Szabo, '60) they develop from already well formed striated muscle fibers. Little is known about electric organ develop- ment of Malapterurus (Johnels, '56) and of gymnotids (Keynes, '61) because of the difficulty in procuring embryonic material due to our ignorance of the breeding habits of these species. During an expedition to the Amazon river in 1964 we had the good fortune to obtain two small specimens of Electro- phorus electricus of 23 and 38 cm in length. Although the specimens were of relatively large size, their electric organs had not yet fully developed. Observations concerning these organs will be presented in the paper. MATERIAL AND METHODS Two young Electrophorus electricus originating from the Amazon delta region (Marajo, State Para) have been used. Both showed normal electric activity - spon- taneous low voltage activity and high volt- age discharges evoked by touch (Hagi- wara, Szabo and Enger, ' 6 5 ) . The 23 cm long fish was fixed in Helly's solution, the 38 cm long one in 10% for- ANAT. REC., 155: 103-110. malin. From the former we took four slices and from the latter two slices, each 5 mm thick obtained from different levels of the longitudinal axis of the fish (fig. 1). The slices were embedded in paraffin, cut in serial sections, partly in transverse, partly in sagittal plane. Mallory's triple stain and Bodian's protargol silver impreg- nation were used. Only critical levels will be described, since the structure of complete transverse sections does not vary significantly centi- meter by centimeter along the longitudinal axis. In order to compare equivalent levels in fish of different length, the ratio of a given level to the total length of the fish was used as an index of position. Couceiro and Ackermann's ('48) find- ings on a 140 cm full grown specimen and Keynes ('63 ) observations on a 12 cm elec- tric eel were compared with our results. RESULTS General. Ekctrophorus has three pairs of electric organs (Hunter, 1775; Sachs', 1877): the main organ ( M ) extends cau- dally from the abdominal cavity along two- thirds of the fish (it surrounds partially the caudal end of the liver); the organ of Sachs' ( S ) extends caudally from the main organ, beyond the latter to the tip of the 1 Supported in part by grants to Drs. S. Hagiwara. L. Kruger and T. H. Bullock from the U. S. Air Force, National Institute of Health Office of Naval Research and National Science Founhation. 2 On leave from the Centre $Etudes de Physiologie Nerveuse, C.N.R.S., 4, av. Gordon Bennett, Paris, 16e, France. 103 104 THOMAS SZABO MAIN ORGAN I SACHS ORGAN A '6 HUNTER'S ORGAN Length I I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I I ',' oFlish 5 10 15 2 7r (6) I " 4 I 1 2 c m ............... ~~~~~ .... ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ 3 7/3 . ~ ~ . ~ ............................. .... .... ~. ~ ~ ----..---.----.-. .....~~.....~ --.. . . . ... ~. .... ~ 3ec.1 5,2 -... ~~ ................... ~~ .... ~ ~~ .~~ ~ ..... -...@ ~. ... ~~ ...... .......................... ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ (& (3 s i Figure 1 Above: Schematic drawing shows the position of the three electric organs of Electrophorus. Below: Number of electroplates at different levels of the 12, 23, 38 and 140 cm long fish. Com- parison was made between real levels of the 23 cm and relative levels of the 12, 38 and 140 cm long fish. Actual levels are indicated in parenthesis. tail. There is some overlap between the two organs as shown in figure 1. Hunter's organ ( H ) extends for the total length of these two organs, lying on the ventral sur- face. The three organs consist of a num- ber of columns of electric plates oriented in the dorso-ventral axis. In the 23 cm long fish it is obvious that the electric organs con- stitute the principal component of the transverse sections at the 6 ( A ) , 10 (B) and 15 cm (C) levels (fig. 2). However, the ratio of electric organjmuscle varies, so that electric organ tissue decreases cau- dalwards: at level 10 cm this ratio is 2 : l , whereas, at 15 cm it is 1.1 : 1, and at the level of Sachs organ (level 19 cm), the muscle volume is larger than the electric organ volume. Exactly the same ratios were found in the full grown (140 cm) specimen, which suggests parallel growth of muscle and electric tissue. However, the comparison of ratios of horizontal/vertical diameter in transverse sections of animals show that the electric eel grows more in the horizontal axis than in the vertical one. In the 23 cm long ani- mal, the horizontal/vertical diameter ra- tios are 1 : 1.5 at the anterior level and 1 : 2 at the posterior level, whereas, for identi- cal levels they are 1 : 1 and 1 : 1.5 in the full grown animal. Main organ. If one compares the transverse sections of different levels under low magnification, an essential difference can be observed in the 140 and the 23 cm fish concerning the thickness (vertical diameter) of the elec- tric plates. In the former, the plates are equally thick in the dorsal as well as in the ventral region. In the latter, the ven- tral plates are much thinner and tightly packed than the dorsal ones. These differ- ences are particularly well seen in sagittal sections of paramedian regions (fig. 3B and C) . A comparison of different levels in the 23 cm long fish shows the anterior ones to have thinner plates than the pos- terior ones (compare in fig. 2 the 6 cm and 15 cm levels). In the 38 cm long fish the ventro-dorsal differences of plate thick- ness are already almost insignificant for the posterior region (fig. 4B), whereas, they are still pronounced in the anterior region (fig. 4 A ) . The number of electric plates contained in one column at different levels in 12, 23, 38, and 140 cm long specimens is shown in figure 1. The plates of one col- umn, seem to be more numerous in the 23 cm than in the 38 cm long fish, which is contrary to what might be expected. What- ever the reason for this apparent decrease may be (comparison of different speci- mens for example), it is probable that our ELECTRIC ORGAN DEVELOPMENT 105 Fig. 2 Transverse sections of a 23 cm long Electrophorus electricus at four levels A, B, C and D (see fig. 1) of the length axis of the fish. M , main organ; H , Hunter’s organ; S, Sachs’ organ. Bar = 1 mm. youngest animal possesses the full num- ber of electric plates. Histologically the electroplates,i.e., the elementary units of electric organ, do not show their definitive form and structure everywhere. The fully developed electro- plate is constituted of thin electroplasm, filling only about one-tenth of its connec- tive tissue compartment. That is the case for the posterior electric organ region of our youngest fish (fig. 3C) . The plate has finger-like processes on both anterior and posterior surfaces. At any given level the ventrally located plates are more volumi- nous, their dorso-ventral axes smaller, and their surfaces have fewer processes. How- ever, in neither ventral nor dorsal plates does the structure of the electroplasm dif- fer significantly in the posterior region of the main organ. As one advances further anteriorly, the histological picture changes progressively in the ventral region of individual plates. The processes of the plates disappear com- pletely and the electroplasm becomes in- creasingly structured. Finally at the 10 cm level, a clearly defined striation appears (fig. 5B), similar to that found in the neighboring striated muscle. Tangential sections show an enormous accumulation of nuclei of electro-(sarco) lemma. At the same antero-posterior level the striation becomes progressively less pro- nounced as one proceeds from the ventro- medial to the dorsal region. The electro- plasm displays only a partial striation until it disappears completely. Figure 5B1 shows plates containing only some debris and a nearly total loss of striation. Their verti- cal axis increases as regions of fully de- veloped plates are reached. It can be concluded that the striated structure in the ventral region of the main organ, represents the primitive form of electric tissue, which suggests that this part of the main organ is the germinative region of its electric tissue. In the 23 cm speci- men the number of plates in a given col- umn is complete everywhere in Hunter’s organ. As shown in figure 1, the number of plates at any antero-posterior level is the same as in a full grown fish. However, comparison of the 23 cm (fig. 2 ) and 38 Hunter’s or,gan. 106 THOMAS SZABO Figure 3 A: Transverse section of the spinal cord at A level. The electro-motor cells are situated dorsal to the central canal ( c ) . Notice undeveloped electro- motor cells close to the central canal. ‘u.T., ventral root. Bar = 100 p. Sagittal section close to the midline showing small electroplates in the ventral region of the main eIectric organ M. H , Hunter‘s organ; n, nerve trunk, A t P antero-posterior direction. Bar = 1 mm. B: C : D: Same as B with higher magnification. Bar = 100 p. Sagittal section of Sachs’ organ at level D. Bar = 500 p. cm (fig. 4) animals shows that Hunter’s organ in the former is at an early stage of development. Hunter’s organ is better developed in the posterior region (fig. 2D), where it lies ventral to Sachs’ organ and inserted between the two pinnalis analis externalis muscles. In the more anterior region, Hunter’s organ represents only a small (fig. 2C) or even tiny (fig. 2B) vol- ume of electric tissue and in the most an- terior region (fig. 2A), the four plates of Hunter’s organ can only be seen under high magnification. At levels B and C, an intermuscular space can be observed between t he pin- nalis analis externalis and internalis mus- cles, into which Hunter’s organ will sup- posedly grow. This would provide some explanation why no muscular atrophy is apparent during organ growth. Hunter’s organ enlarges its volume 100 times at level C, and 300 times at level B. ELECTRIC ORGAN DEVELOPMENT 107 The foregoing observations suggest that the most anterior part of Hunter’s organ i s the less developed at this stage. The his- tological picture of electroplates supports this suggestion. Only ia the anterior part of Hunter’s organ (level A and B ) do the plates show a striated structure (fig. 5C) similar to that found in the ventral region of the main organ. These plates are rela- tively thick, and the electrolemma displays no finger-like processes. At level C, stria- tion of the electroplasm has already dis- appeared. ‘The electrolemma begins to fold, but the electroplasm still remains thick. In sagittal sections at C level (fig. 3B) , the ventral region shows slightly smaller plates than in the dorsal region, indicating some evidence for a ventro-dorsal develop- ment of Hunter’s organ, similar to that of the main organ. Sachs’ organ. In the 23 cm fish, sec- tions cut transversally at any level of the tail region reveal a well developed struc- ture characteristic of the full grown ani- mal. However, the ventral plates of the Sachs’ organ are somewhat thinner (dorso- ventral axis), the electroplasm more voluminous (antero-posterior axis) and the finger-like processes of the plates shorter than the dorsal ones. No striation can be seen in any of these plates. We found, however, in the very anterior part of Sachs’ organ, at its ventral border, some undeveloped electric tissue. It has the appearance of very large muscle fi- bers, some part of which is striated (fig. SD), and its cell membrane crowded by nuclei. This structure, very much like un- developed electroplates, is enclosed in the general connective tissue envelope of Sachs’ organ. These are the only indica- tions of the muscular origin of Sachs’ organ. Fig. 4 Transverse sections of the 38 cm long fish at the middle (A) and posterior (B) region of the main organ (M). H , Hunter’s organ. Bar = 1 mm. Figure 5 A: €3 and BI: C: D: Transverse section of the 23 cm long fish at A level showing the germinative region of the main organ. Bar = 100 p . Higher magnification of the regions B and B I indicated in A. Undeveloped electroplate of Hunter’s organ at level B indicated in figure 1. Undeveloped electroplate of Sachs’ organ (arrow). Ears for E, B1, C and D = 10 P. ELECTRIC ORGAN DEVELOPMENT 109 DISCUSSION According to Max Ellis (’13), Fritsch in 1881 concluded that the main electric or- gan of Electrqhorus originated through the metamorphosis of the lateralis i m u s muscle, because of the “position occupied by the large electric organ” (Fritsch com- pared gymnotids and Electrophorus). From this statement originates the classical no- tion that the electric tissue of the electric eel is of muscular origin. We compared different muscle tissue volume ratios in fish of different sizes and found that the lateralis imus muscle as well as other muscles grow proportionally. It is, therefore, unlikely that electric tis- sue grows “at the expense of” muscle tis- sue. Also, if we compare carefully the relative size of the lateralis imus muscle in Ekctrophorus and other gymnotids, there is no reason to conclude that this muscle is only a remnant in Ekctrophorus. How- ever, our results do not exclude the possi- bility that the electric tissue of the main organ originates from that part of meso- derm from which the lateralis imus arises. We can only say, on the basis of Keynes’ (’61) and our results, that the germinative region of the electric organ is separated from the lateralis imus muscle by the thick collagenous envelope of this muscle. We have confirmed Keynes’ findings (’61), that the germinative region of the main organ is the ventral part of this or- gan, close to the midline. In contrast, the striated structure of undeveloped electro- plates of the main, Hunter’s and Sachs’ organ indicates that all three electric or- gans of Electrophorus originate from striated muscle fibers, the structure and form of which will fundamentally change during development. Consequently the electroplatesdo not develop directly from myoblasts (cf. Keynes, ’61) but from well formed striated muscle fibers, similar to Gymnarchus (Dahlgren, ’14), Raja (Engel- mann, 1894) and normyrids (Szabo, ’60). Wachtel’s (’64) electron microscopical ob- servations support this statement. This author finds some remnant of muscle tis- sue of myofibrillar origin in adult electro- plates. The course of development of the three organs is not simultaneous. It seems prob- able that Sachs’ organ develops first, then the main organ and finally Hunter’s organ. The fact that Keynes (’61) did not find Hunter’s organ in the tail region of a 12 cm fish, also confirms a successive develop- ment of the organs, although a wide over- lap in time is certain. Considering the or- gans individually, they have a ventro- dorsal development, and at an appropriate level (A or B level) the successive steps of transformation of a striated muscle fiber into an electroplate can be followed. The posterior part of each organ, containing undeveloped electroplates, develops more rapidly than the anterior part. This antero- posterior temporal difference has also been described in Gymnarchus (Dahlgren, ’14) where the anterior region of the electric organ develops last. However, it is possible that the organ differentiation starts in an- other region since the rate of differentia- tion may not necessarily be the same in all parts of the organ (cf. Dahlgren, ’14). Our findings also indicate that electric or- gan development in Electrophorus is largely a post-embryonic one. We could not follow the course of inner- vation of the organs, because silver im- pregnation were not successfuly accom- plished in our youngest fish. The fact, however, that this fish was producing low voltage as well as high voltage impulses (Hagiwara, Szabo and Enger, ’ 6 5 ) , indi- cates that the innervation was complete at least for the fully developed plates. How- ever, the presence of undeveloped electro- motor cells (fig. 3A) in the spinal cord suggests that the germinative region still had not received its nerve endings. The central command nucleus of the electric discharge, situated in the medulla, was fully developed, as might be expected from results obtained in other electric fish (Szabo, ’61 ). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author is indebted to Drs. T. H. Bullock and L. Kruger for their helpful criticism of the manuscript and to Dr. G. Krauthamer €or correcting the English. LITERATURE CITED Couceiro, A., and M. Ackermann 1948 Sur quelques aspects du tissu Blectrique de 1’Elec- trophonrs electficus (Linnaeus). Ac. bras. Cienc., 20: 383-395. 110 THOMAS SZABO Dahlgren, U. 1914 Origin of the electric tis- sue of Gymnamhus nibticus. Dept. Marine Biology, Carnegie Institution, Washington. Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory, 6 (Publi- cations No. 183): 161-194. Ellis, M. 1913 The gymnotid eels of tropical America. Memoirs of the Carnegie Museum, Engehnann, T. W. 1894 Die Blatterschicht des elektrischen Organs von Raja in ihren geneti- schen Beziehungen zur quergestreiften Muskel- substanz. Pfluger's Arch., 57: 149-180. Hagiwara, S., T. Szabo and P. Enger 1965 Physiological properties of electroreceptors in the electzic eel, Electrophorus electricus. J. Neurophysiol., 28: 775-783. Hunter, J. 1775 An account of the Gymnotus electricus. Phil. Trans., 65: 395. Johnels, A. G. 1956 On the origin of the elec- tric organ in Malapterurus electricus. Quart. J. Micr. Sc., 97: 45-64. Keynes, R. D. 1961 The development of the electric organ in Electrophorus electricus (L). NO. 111, 109-195. In: Bioelectrogenesis, C. Chagas and A. Paes de Carvalho, eds., Elsevier Publ. Co., Amster- dam, pp. 14-19. Ogneff, J. 1897 Uber die Entwicklung des elek- trischen organs bei Torpedo. Arch. f. Anat. und Physiol., Physiol. Abt., 270-304. Sachs, C. 1877 Beobachtungen und Versuche an siidamerikanischen Zitteraale. Arch. f. Physiol., 66-95. Szabo, T. 1960 Development of the electric or- gan of Mormyridae. Nature, 188: 760-762. 1961 Rapports ontog6nCtiques entre l'organe blectrique, son innervation et sa com- mande endphalique (Mormyrus rume). Zeit- schrft. Zellf., 55: 200-203. Wachtel, A. W. 1964 The ultrastructural re- lationships of electric organs and muscle. I. Filamentous systems. J. Morph., 114: 325-360. White, E. G. 1918 The origin of the electric organs in Astroscopus guttatus. Dept. Marine Biology, Carnegie Institution, Washington. Papers from the Dept. of Marine Biology, 12 (Publications No. 252): 139-172.
Compartilhar