Autoria e esquiva  pensamento  ética e subjetivação em Michel Foucault
16 pág.

Autoria e esquiva pensamento ética e subjetivação em Michel Foucault


DisciplinaPensamento e Inteligencia I22 materiais49 seguidores
Pré-visualização6 páginas
AutoriA e esquivA:
pensamento, ética e subjetivação em michel Foucault
Eduardo Leal CunhaH
Este artigo se fundamenta nos argumentos de Richard Bernstein em defesa da 
postura crítica de Foucault, contextualizados a partir do debate com Habermas, 
para quem a teoria foucaultiana do poder se ressentiria da explicitação de seus 
fundamentos normativos. Procuramos indicar, baseados na conferência sobre a 
função do autor, de 1969, o modo como tal postura se materializa precisamente 
na recusa em assumir uma posição de enunciação vinculada à proclamação 
tanto da Verdade quanto do Bem. Tal recusa, aqui denominada esquiva, faz com 
que a crítica seja permanente e se constitua como entrelaçamento entre trabalho 
filosófico, problematização ética e formas de subjetivação.
Palavras-chave: ética; ontologia do presente; subjetivação; Foucault.
Authorship And AvoidAnce:
tought, ethics and subjectivation in michel Foucault
The article starts with the arguments of Richard Bernstein in behalf of Foucault\u2019 
critical attitude in the context of the debate with Habermas, according to whom 
Foucault\u2019s theory about power lacked the explicitness of its normative foundations. 
We tried to indicate, considering as a ground the conference about the author\u2019s 
function, of 1969, the way in which such an attitude materializes itself precisely 
in the refusal of assuming a position of enunciation attached to the proclamation 
of the Truth as well as of the Good. Such a refusal, here named avoidance, makes 
this critique a permannent one and constitutes itself as an interlacing between 
philosophical work, ethical problematization and modes of subjectivation.
Keywords: ethics; ontology of the present; subjectivation; Foucault.
H\u2009Este\u2009trabalho\u2009resulta\u2009de\u2009pesquisa\u2009realizada\u2009com\u2009o\u2009apoio\u2009financeiro\u2009do\u2009PAIRD/UFS.
HH\u2009Doutor\u2009em\u2009Saúde\u2009Coletiva\u2009(Instituto\u2009de\u2009Medicina\u2009Social\u2009-\u2009Universidade\u2009do\u2009Estado\u2009do\u2009Rio\u2009de\u2009
Janeiro)\u2009e\u2009Mestre\u2009em\u2009Teoria\u2009Psicanalítica\u2009(Universidade\u2009Federal\u2009do\u2009Rio\u2009de\u2009Janeiro),\u2009Professor\u2009do\u2009
Núcleo\u2009de\u2009Pós-Graduação\u2009em\u2009Psicologia\u2009Social\u2009e\u2009do\u2009Dep.\u2009de\u2009Psicologia\u2009da\u2009Universidade\u2009Federal\u2009
de\u2009Sergipe.\u2009Membro\u2009do\u2009Espaço\u2009Brasileiro\u2009de\u2009Estudos\u2009Psicanalíticos.\u2009Endereço:\u2009Universidade\u2009
Federal\u2009de\u2009Sergipe,\u2009Centro\u2009de\u2009Educação\u2009de\u2009Ciências\u2009Humanas,\u2009Departamento\u2009de\u2009Psicologia.\u2009
Cidade\u2009Universitária\u2009Prof.\u2009José\u2009Aloisio\u2009de\u2009Campos\u2009-\u2009Av.\u2009Marechal\u2009Rondon\u2009s/nº\u2009-\u2009Jardim\u2009Rosa\u2009
Elze,\u2009Sao\u2009Cristovao,\u2009SE\u2009\u2013\u2009Brasil.\u2009CEP:\u200949100-000.
E-mail:\u2009dudalealc@uol.com.br
482\u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 Fractal:\u2009Revista\u2009de\u2009Psicologia,\u2009v.\u200922\u2009\u2013\u2009n.\u20093, p.\u2009481-496,\u2009Set./Dez.\u20092010
Eduardo Leal Cunha
Gostaria\u2009de\u2009me\u2009insinuar\u2009subrepticiamente\u2009no\u2009discurso\u2009que\u2009devo\u2009
pronunciar\u2009hoje\u2009[...].\u2009\u2009Ao\u2009invés\u2009de\u2009tomar\u2009a\u2009palavra,\u2009gostaria\u2009de\u2009
ser\u2009envolvido\u2009por\u2009ela\u2009[...].\u2009Não\u2009haveria,\u2009portanto,\u2009começo;\u2009e,\u2009
em\u2009vez\u2009de\u2009ser\u2009aquele\u2009de\u2009quem\u2009parte\u2009o\u2009discurso,\u2009eu\u2009seria,\u2009antes\u2009
ao\u2009acaso\u2009de\u2009seu\u2009desenrolar,\u2009uma\u2009estreita\u2009lacuna,\u2009o\u2009ponto\u2009de\u2009seu\u2009
desaparecimento\u2009possível\u2009(FOUCAULT,\u20091994b,\u2009p.\u20095).
Este\u2009artigo\u2009discute\u2009a\u2009postura\u2009crítica\u2009de\u2009Foucault\u2009(1994a[1984]),\u2009como\u2009condi-
ção\u2009para\u2009a\u2009\u201contologia\u2009de\u2009nós\u2009mesmos\u201d, proposta\u2009no\u2009artigo\u2009sobre\u2009as\u2009luzes,\u2009de\u20091984.\u2009
Tomamos\u2009 como\u2009 referência\u2009 a\u2009 crítica\u2009 habermasiana\u2009 ao\u2009 pensamento\u2009 de\u2009Foucault\u2009
e,\u2009como\u2009ponto\u2009de\u2009partida,\u2009a\u2009observação\u2009de\u2009Richard\u2009Bernstein\u2009(1994),\u2009segundo\u2009a\u2009
qual\u2009o\u2009elemento\u2009central,\u2009definidor\u2009da\u2009crítica\u2009foucaultiana,\u2009ou\u2009mais\u2009precisamente\u2009
da\u2009sua\u2009\u201cpostura\u201d\u2009crítica,\u2009seria\u2009a\u2009dimensão\u2009retórica.1\u2009A\u2009partir\u2009da\u2009proposição\u2009de\u2009uma\u2009
\u201cretórica\u2009da\u2009ruptura\u201d (BERNSTEIN,\u20091994),\u2009que\u2009marcaria\u2009o\u2009trabalho\u2009filosófico\u2009de\u2009
Foucault,\u2009Bernstein\u2009pretende\u2009responder\u2009a\u2009Habermas\u2009(2000)\u2009e\u2009a\u2009outros\u2009críticos\u2009do\u2009
filósofo\u2009francês\u2009que\u2009veem,\u2009nas\u2009suas\u2009formulações,\u2009\u201cconfusões,\u2009contradições\u2009e\u2009in-
coerência\u201d\u2009(BERNSTEIN,\u20091994,\u2009p.\u2009213)\u2009e,\u2009sobretudo,\u2009o\u2009acusam\u2009de\u2009não\u2009explicitar\u2009
os\u2009fundamentos\u2009normativos\u2009que\u2009orientariam\u2009o\u2009trabalho\u2009crítico.
Contra\u2009a\u2009existência\u2009de \u201cfundamentos\u2009necessários\u201d\u2009\u2013\u2009o\u2009que\u2009implicaria\u2009a\u2009
afirmação,\u2009em\u2009Foucault,\u2009de\u2009um\u2009valor,\u2009cujo\u2009estatuto\u2009seria\u2009necessariamente\u2009uni-
versal\u2009e\u2009se\u2009materializaria\u2009como\u2009Verdade\u2009ou\u2009Bem\u2009\u2013\u2009a\u2009resposta\u2009proposta\u2009por\u2009Berns-
tein\u2009destaca\u2009a\u2009linguagem,\u2009na\u2009medida\u2009em\u2009que\u2009práticas\u2009discursivas\u2009se\u2009articulam\u2009
com\u2009determinadas\u2009posturas\u2009éticas.\u2009Assim,\u2009para\u2009Bernstein,\u2009com\u2009a\u2009valorização\u2009da\u2009
dimensão\u2009ética\u2009das\u2009práticas\u2009discursivas\u2009em\u2009Foucault,\u2009como\u2009eixo\u2009do\u2009seu\u2009trabalho\u2009
filosófico\u2009e\u2009condição\u2009de\u2009seu\u2009modelo\u2009de\u2009crítica\u2009\u2013\u2009predominantemente\u2009local\u2009e\u2009não\u2009
global,\u2009 ao\u2009 contrário\u2009 do\u2009modelo\u2009 habermasiano,\u2009 teríamos\u2009 o\u2009 entrelaçamento\u2009 de\u2009
pensamento,\u2009ética\u2009e\u2009subjetivação.
Partindo\u2009de\u2009tal\u2009\u201cretórica\u2009da\u2009ruptura\u201d,\u2009nos\u2009interessa\u2009buscar,\u2009na\u2009obra\u2009do\u2009fi-
lósofo\u2009francês,\u2009antes\u2009mesmo\u2009da\u2009explicitação\u2009da\u2009problematização\u2009ética,\u2009nos\u2009anos\u2009
1980,\u2009marcas\u2009de\u2009entrelaçamento,\u2009nas\u2009quais\u2009o\u2009trabalho\u2009filosófico\u2009e\u2009a\u2009verdade\u2009e\u2009sua\u2009
enunciação\u2009se\u2009vinculam\u2009a\u2009modos\u2009de\u2009construção\u2009de\u2009si.
Procuraremos\u2009identificar,\u2009tanto\u2009no\u2009texto\u2009sobre\u2009a\u2009função\u2009autor\u2009(FOUCAULT,\u2009
2006a),\u2009no\u2009qual\u2009estão\u2009em\u2009questão\u2009as\u2009relações\u2009entre\u2009sujeito\u2009e\u2009obra,\u2009quanto,\u2009embora\u2009
em\u2009menor\u2009medida,\u2009na\u2009aula\u2009inaugural\u2009do\u2009Collège de France,\u2009conhecida\u2009como\u2009A 
ordem do discurso\u2009(FOUCAULT,\u20091996),\u2009o\u2009desdobramento\u2009de\u2009tal\u2009\u201cpostura\u2009crítica\u201d\u2009
em\u2009uma\u2009atitude,\u2009ao\u2009mesmo\u2009tempo\u2009retórica\u2009e\u2009subjetiva,\u2009que\u2009descreveremos\u2009como\u2009
esquiva.\u2009Vincularemos,\u2009 também,\u2009tal\u2009atitude\u2009à\u2009recusa\u2009em\u2009enunciar\u2009uma\u2009verdade\u2009
ou\u2009valor\u2009absolutos,\u2009sem\u2009que,\u2009ao\u2009fazer\u2009isso,\u2009seja\u2009necessário,\u2009contudo,\u2009renunciar\u2009à\u2009
crítica\u2009ou\u2009a\u2009um\u2009horizonte\u2009ético-político. 
poder, vAlor e normA nA críticA foucAultiAnA
No\u2009texto\u2009sobre\u2009a\u2009Aufklärung2 (FOUCAULT,\u20091994a),\u2009segundo\u2009Bernstein,\u2009po-
demos\u2009localizar\u2009a\u2009resposta\u2009foucaultiana\u2009àqueles\u2009que,\u2009como\u2009Habermas,\u2009o\u2009acusam\u2009de\u2009
chegar\u2009a\u2009contradições\u2009performativas\u2009por\u2009conta\u2009da\u2009existência\u2009implícita,\u2009necessária\u2009
Fractal:\u2009Revista\u2009de\u2009Psicologia,\u2009v.\u200922\u2009\u2013\u2009n.\u20093,\u2009p.\u2009481-496,\u2009Set./Dez.\u20092010\u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 \u2009 483
Autoria\u2009e\u2009esquiva:\u2009pensamento,\u2009ética\u2009e\u2009subjetivação\u2009em\u2009Michel\u2009Foucault
e\u2009ao\u2009mesmo\u2009tempo\u2009negada,\u2009de\u2009fundamentos\u2009normativos\u2009em\u2009sua\u2009obra.\u2009\u2009Ali,\u2009o\u2009pen-
sador\u2009francês\u2009recorre\u2009a\u2009Kant\u2009para\u2009se\u2009inserir\u2009na\u2009linhagem\u2009do\u2009pensamento\u2009moderno\u2009
\u2013\u2009como\u2009herdeiro\u2009do\u2009movimento\u2009crítico\u2009\u2013\u2009ao\u2009mesmo\u2009tempo\u2009em\u2009que\u2009anuncia,\u2009como\u2009
marca\u2009da\u2009modernidade,\u2009não\u2009a\u2009produção\u2009de\u2009uma\u2009normatividade\u2009própria,\u2009como\u2009pre-
tende\u2009Habermas\u2009(GIACÓIA\u2009JUNIOR,\u20091994),\u2009mas\u2009a\u2009interrogação\u2009sobre\u2009o\u2009presente\u2009
e\u2009a\u2009crítica\u2009da\u2009própria\u2009experiência\u2009moderna,\u2009especialmente\u2009quando\u2009é\u2009centrada\u2009na\u2009
razão\u2009e\u2009na\u2009subjetividade,\u2009o\u2009que\u2009o\u2009aproxima\u2009da\u2009linhagem\u2009nietzschiana.\u2009
Com\u2009isso,\u2009Foucault\u2009pretende\u2009não\u2009apenas\u2009filiar-se\u2009à\u2009tradição\u2009crítica\u2009do\u2009ilu-
minismo,\u2009ao\u2009mesmo\u2009tempo\u2009em\u2009que\u2009se\u2009afasta\u2009do\u2009que\u2009descreve\u2009como\u2009humanismo,\u2009
mas\u2009 também\u2009escapar\u2009a\u2009qualquer\u2009 forma\u2009daquilo\u2009que\u2009descreve\u2009como\u2009chantagem\u2009
iluminista,\u2009a\u2009qual\u2009deixaria\u2009o\u2009irracionalismo\u2009como\u2009única\u2009alternativa\u2009à\u2009racionalida-
de\u2009moderna\u2009nascida\u2009nas\u2009luzes\u2009e\u2009vinculada\u2009ao\u2009princípio\u2009de\u2009subjetividade.\u2009Ao\u2009con-
trário,\u2009indica\u2009Foucault,\u2009é\u2009traço\u2009distintivo\u2009da\u2009modernidade,\u2009não\u2009apenas\u2009em\u2009Kant,\u2009
mas\u2009 também\u2009 em\u2009Baudelaire,\u2009 a\u2009 permanente\u2009 interrogação\u2009 e\u2009 construção\u2009 de\u2009 si. É 
deste\u2009modo\u2009que\u2009Foucault\u2009define\u2009seu\u2009trabalho:\u2009como\u2009crítica\u2009permanente\u2009na\u2009forma\u2009
de\u2009uma\u2009\u201contologia\u2009de\u2009nós\u2009mesmos\u201d.\u2009
Com\u2009base\u2009na\u2009apologia\u2009empreendida\u2009por\u2009Foucault,\u2009em\u2009última\u2009instância\u2009de\u2009
seu\u2009próprio\u2009método\u2009e\u2009da\u2009sua\u2009forma\u2009de\u2009compreender\u2009a\u2009modernidade\u2009e\u2009a\u2009racio-
nalidade\u2009moderna,\u2009os\u2009quais\u2009são\u2009articulados\u2009a\u2009uma\u2009compreensão\u2009específica\u2009do\u2009
trabalho\u2009filosófico,\u2009Bernstein\u2009procura,\u2009ao\u2009mesmo\u2009 tempo,\u2009 localizar\u2009o\u2009cerne\u2009da\u2009
postura\u2009crítica\u2009de\u2009Foucault\u2009e\u2009responder\u2009aos\u2009críticos\u2009de\u2009tal\u2009postura,\u2009especialmen-
te\u2009Nancy\u2009Fraser\u2009e\u2009Habermas.
Bernstein\u2009constrói\u2009a\u2009sua\u2009argumentação\u2009em\u2009três\u2009estágios:\u2009destacar,\u2009no\u2009texto\u2009
sobre a Aufklärung,\u2009os\u2009pontos\u2009que\u2009se\u2009referem\u2009especificamente\u2009à\u2009crítica\u2009e\u2009suas\u2009con-
dições;\u2009analisar\u2009as\u2009principais\u2009objeções\u2009ao\u2009pensamento\u2009de\u2009Foucault,\u2009as\u2009quais\u2009pre-
tendem\u2009expor\u2009suas\u2009\u201cconfusões,\u2009contradições\u2009e\u2009incoerência\u201d;\u2009e\u2009retomar\u2009a\u2009defesa\u2009
de\u2009Foucault\u2009e\u2009de\u2009alguns\u2009de\u2009seus\u2009seguidores\u2009para,\u2009a\u2009partir\u2009daí,\u2009propor\u2009uma\u2009resposta\u2009
à\u2009questão\u2009de\u2009\u201cqual\u2009é\u2009o\u2009ethos\u2009filosófico\u2009que\u2009poderia\u2009ser\u2009descrito\u2009como\u2009uma\u2009crítica\u2009
permanente\u2009da\u2009nossa\u2009era\u2009histórica\u201d\u2009(BERNSTEIN,\u20091994,\u2009p.\u2009214).
Temos,\u2009então,\u2009traçados\u2009dois\u2009caminhos:\u2009tomando\u2009como\u2009referência\u2009a