Vista previa del material en texto
Experience With High Potential Testing Hydro Generator Multi Turn Stator Coils Using 60 Hz ac, dc, and VLF (0.1 Hz) Stefan0 Bomben Ontario Power Generation 14000 Niagara Parkway. Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON CANADA LOS ILO stefano.bomben@opg.com Howard Sedding John DiPaul Rick Glowacki Kinectrics Inc. 800 Kipling Ave. Toronto, ON CANADA M8Z 6C4 Absfract: There are many different methods of employing a high potential test on a stator winding. Three such methods that this paper will explore with reference to one another are the ac (50-60 Hz), de, and very low frequency (VLF) (0.1 Hz). Some users choose the ac high potential test knowing that this test best simulates the voltage stress on the winding while in service. Other users prefer the de high potential test largely due to ease in performing the test. However, the dc voltage does not stress the stator coils the same way as when they are in service and may result in overly pessimistic results due to the influence of surface contaminants in the end windings. Finally, the VLF test, due to recent advances in technology, is becoming more practical for use in field conditions. However, the present standard governing the test is almost 40 years old and there is significant interest in what VLF voltage level best correlates with the ac and de high potential tests. This paper reports preliminary test results on three generator windings that were destructively tested using the ac, dc, and VLF methods as part of an ongoing eNort to provide a database upon which to set the appropriate VLF hipot level for modern synthetic resin-based stator insulation systems. INTRODUCTION Throughout the electrical industry, whether a user or manufacturer, high potential testing of rotating machines is necessary to ensure the machine is fit for service as well as peace of mind. Thermal and partial discharge (PD) breakdown, combined with the mechanical stresses during operation, are common ways to degrade insulation. There are many different types of high potential tests that can be used as 3 fmai check to detehine if the insulation system is fit to raium to service. Theie high potential tests include the ac, dc, aid very low frequency (VLF) 0.1 Hz [I]. Some users, depending on the size'of the rotating machine, will use an ac high potential test, knowing that this test best simulates the voltage stress on the winding while in service and the results ?!e easily interpreted. The transformer required for this test can be quite large and bulky and is limiting in terms of where it can be moved around to test from place to place. The dc test is very popular due to the compact size of the test unit, and the ease and speed at which a dc high potential test can be done. Further, recent work implies that the test may be capable of providing diagnostic information- when done under controlled conditions [2]. The compact size offers portability from location to location and the electrical hookup is quite simple. Unfortunately, the dc test mainly measures the conducting breakdown strength of the insulation. Recent advances have rendered VLF test sets which are very compact, easy to transport from place to place and affordable. The VLF test also has the advantage of stressing the insulation similar to that in service, with the results reflecting the three.main insulation breakdoddegradation categories, which include electrical conduction, thermal, and PD breakdown. However, a key issue is what level should a hipot performed under VLF conditions be set at? BACKGROUND The IEEE 433 working group on the Recommended Practice for Insulation Testing of AC Electric Machinery with High Voltage at Very Low Frequency [3] is currently rewriting the document. Hence, test results from testing generator windings using the three methods of high potential testing are being considered by the working group. It was decided in the working group that more corroboration between the ac, dc, and VLF voltage values was necessary in order to assist in fmalizing the document. As part of ongoing maintenance, a number of large hydro generators at Ontario Power Generation have been rewound. Prior to the rewind, it was decided to use some of these machines as subject windings and test them to failure using the 0-7803-7935-7/03/$17.00 02003 IEEE 435 mailto:stefano.bomben@opg.com ac, dc, and VLF high potential test methods. Before the high potential tests were performed, a series of tests that included a polarization index, dissipation factor, capacitance, discharge inception, and discharge extinction voltage were done for information purposes and will not he discussed in this paper. All the windings that were tested were wye connected and hence the neutral connection was removed in order to achieve phase separation. Within the phases, phase leg segregation was also done. Due to the reactive limitation of the ac and VLF test sets. the configuration of the windme or sub-sections 0.1 Hz. Individual coils on one circuit of tho: winding WCI isolated and every third coil was subject to one of the abo: high voltage tests. The results of the testing on Machine A a summarized in Table 2. - I Table 2: Summary of Hipot Tests on Machine A of the winding had to he changed. This allowed for proper testing of the coils and a more controlled test atmosphere. The test configurations will be specified in the test results section where, BD =breakdown; FO = flashover; ws =withstand Inspection of Table 2 shows that out of 22 hipots only soli below for each machine tested. Insulating blankets were used to prevent inadvertent flashovers to grounded parts of the generator. An insulating blanket was inserted where the cut was made in the phase leg in order to isolate the tested and non tested portion of the phase leg. The other two phases were grounded during the test period. This way, the coils were being tested phase to phase and phase to ground, which is a typical method of testing a winding before returning it to service. Each one of the tests was concluded once a failure or flashover occurred or the maximum voltage of the test set was reached and no failure occurred. TEST RESULTS insulation breakdown occurred under the ac hipot. Ti breakdown voltage was 4 kV ac rms and occurred on a LC that was one up from the neutral, thus failure in-service wou! he of low probability even with a hipot level as low as 4 k\ All of the other ac hipots resulted in flashovers ranging fro, 20 to 46 kV ac rms. Flashovers under dc test conditions tor place in the range from 80 to 120 kV dc with a withstix voltage of 125 kV dc recorded on one coil. No breakdow resulted from application of the VLF power supply; tf majority of test objects withstanding 54 kV peak, the limit c the test set for this particular ioad. Removing the one ac hipot failure from consideration, tk remaining 21 coils in this circuit satisfy the various factcl The nominal ratings of the machines subject to the test level standard hipot requirements set out in the relevant IEb: program are outlined in Table 1 below. documents. Interestingly, the factory test levels WCI surpassed for the majority of the coils tested in this aged ;.P heavily contaminated winding. Testing of Machine B was accomplished using the same ?e equipment described above. However, in this case, due t constraints imposed by the rewind schedule, the winding w= Table 1: Nominal machine ratings Previous experience with breakdown studies in a field environment [4] has demonstrated the difficulty in minimizing flashovers and verifying solid insulation breakdown. Consequently, in the Tables helow that summarize the test results, breakdown is defined as an event in which two conditions are satisfied. 1. 2. A flashover is not observed. Subsequent attempts to re-energize the test object result in lower breakdown voltages or failure to raise voltage configured as followsfor the purpose of the tests. The dc sr VLF tests were performed on entire circuits consisting of 1 coils each. Due to limitations in the ac high voltage poii. supply, only the top six coils from the line end in three cirwii were subject to the ac hipot. Hipot Test Number Number Objects BD I FOP nr I I r n I " I " I J Table 3: Summary of Hipot Tests on Machine B High voltage tests on Machine A were accomplished using a transformer and a 60 kV peak VLF power supply operating at The test data contained in Table 3 show that dc and ac h ip hipots, failures were recorded at 24 and 3 1 kV dc, significauii 125 kV' dc 'Owe' a 6o kv' 2A resonant failures were recorded on this winding. Itegarding the r' 436 d o w the level required of new windings, 50 kVdc for a 13.8 ~V ac rms voltage class. The ac hipot breakdowns occurred at ’7 and 30 kV ac rms, the former failure being just helow the ’9 kVac rms level specified for this voltage class. Only :.ithstand voltages, in the range of 33 - 34 kV peak, were scorded using the VLF test set. Unfortunately, the current imitation on the power supply did not permit testing at dtages approaching the IEEE 433 limits, i.e., 47 kV peak. *. third stator winding, Machine C, was also subject to ac, dc :?d VLF hipot testing. The high voltage tests were conducted 311 coil groups consisting of three complete coils. This type of e$! object was considered to provide an opportunity to d o r m hipots on the maximum number of coils possible in he time permitted while considering the limitations of the Bower supplies available. The ac hipots in this case were :xomplished using a 30 kV, 2A power supply due to the evailability of the 60 kV supply during the narrow time :,indow permitted by the rewind schedule. The results are -0ntained in Table 4. Test Number I Objects I BD than the factory levels. The majority of the test results show that, despite the aged condition of the windings, almost 90% of the objects tested withstood levels significantly above the factory or IEEE requirements. No failures attributable to the application of the VLF hipot were recorded. Examination of the ac and VLF hipot results shows that, where comparable, i.e., machines A and C, the 1.63 factor? suggested in a IEEE 433 - 1974 is not obviously invalid. Inspection of the ac and dc hipot results shows that, where comparable, the standard 1.7 factor published in the literature is appropriate. 3. 4. 5. The above results and conclusions should he considered as very preliminary and further work consisting of similar controlled breakdown studies on aged, or even new, stator windings is required to answer the key question. Is the 1.63E value for a VLF hipot test still valid for modem synthetic insulation systems? REFERENCES Number Number FO WS DC 1 6 AC I 6 - VLF 1 5 0 .6 0 0 0 0 6 I . Ward, B.H., J.P. Steiner, “Rotating Machine Insulation Evaluation At Very Low Frequencies”, IEEE Panel Session on I - :iiiistand voltages of 30 kV, this level still exceeds the (2E+1) -V value for new windings. The VLF hipots were limited to -0 kV peak by the load; however, the values achieved were in xordance with the 1.63 factor described in the current zision of IEEE 433. ;ONCLUSIONS series of hipot tests employing ac, dc and VLF excitation .:hemes have been carried out on three hydraulic generator :?!or windings prior to rewind. These tests are part of an mgoing program to aid definition of the appropriate factor to nie to provide some means of comparability of conventional lower 6equency ac hipot testing with VLF hipots. The d m i n a r y results ofthe study show that, . The majority of the hipots, whether ac, dc or VLF, result in flashover or withstands, not solid insulation breakdown. The lowest breakdown voltage, regardless of excitation type, recorded was 4 kV ac rms. Five other breakdowns were recorded, of which three occurred at voltages lower 3. IEEE Recommended Practice for Insulation Testing of AC Electric Machinery with High Voltage at Very Low Frequency - 1974. G.C. Stone, H.G. Sedding, B.A. Lloyd, and B.K. Gupta, ”The ability of diagnostic tests to estimate the remaining life of stator insulation”, IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, EC-3, December 1988. 4. BIOGRAPHY Stefann Bnmben is Sr. Engineer Hydro Generators at Ontario Power Generation (formerly Ontario Hydro). He received his Bachelors of Applied Science in Electrical Engineering 60m the University of Windsor in 1991. Upon graduation he took employment with Ontario Hydro at the Sir Adam Beck generating and one year later went to work at the head ofice of Ontario Hydro for the Hydraulic Plant Equipment-Electrical Department. For the past 12 years he has been working on the maintenance, repair, and overhauls of hydro generators, switchgear, and transformers. Stefan0 currently works at the Electricity Production Central Office of Ontario Power 437 Generation in Niagara in the Electrical & Protection & Controls group responsible for the condition monitoring and maintenance of hydro generators, transformers, switchgear and protection systems. Stefan0 is a registered Professional Engineer in the province of Ontario and an active member of the IEEE.