Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Esta é uma pré-visualização de arquivo. Entre para ver o arquivo original
UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MONTES CLAROS Lucas Oliveira Barros Bioprospecção de actinobactérias endofíticas da Mata Seca e Campo Rupestre do norte de Minas Gerais, com atividade antimicrobiana. Montes Claros 2019 Lucas Oliveira Barros Bioprospecção de actinobactérias endofíticas da Mata Seca e Campo Rupestre do norte de Minas Gerais, com atividade antimicrobiana. Montes Claros 2019 Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências em Saúde da Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros - Unimontes, como parte das exigências para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências da Saúde. Área de Concentração: Mecanismos e Aspectos Clínicos das Doenças Orientador: Profa. Dra. Ana Cristina de Carvalho Botelho Coorientador: Prof. Dr. Sérgio Avelino Mota Nobre B277b Barros, Lucas Oliveira. Bioprospecção de actinobactérias endofíticas da Mata Seca e Campo Rupestre do Norte de Minas Gerais, com atividade antimicrobiana [manuscrito] / Lucas Oliveira Barros. –2019. 61 f. : il. Inclui Bibliografia. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros - Unimontes, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde /PPGCS, 2019. Orientadora: Profa. Dra. Ana Cristina de Carvalho Botelho. Coorientador: Prof. Dr. Sérgio Avelino Mota Nobre. 1. Actinobactéria. 2. Antibacterianos. 3. Bioprospecção. 4. Bactérias Gram- Positivas. I. Botelho, Ana Cristina de Carvalho. II. Nobre, Sérgio Avelino Mota. III. Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros. IV. Título. Catalogação Biblioteca Central Professor Antônio Jorge UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE MONTES CLAROS-UNIMONTES Reitor: Prof. Antônio Alvimar de Souza Vice-reitor: Profa. Ilva Ruas de Abreu Pró-reitor de Pesquisa: Prof. José Reinaldo Mendes Ruas Coordenadoria de Acompanhamento de Projetos: Profa. Karen Torres Correa Lafetá de Almeida Coordenadoria de Iniciação Científica: Prof. Sônia Ribeiro Arrudas Coordenadoria de Inovação Tecnológica: Prof. Dario Alves de Oliveira Pró-reitor de Pós-graduação: Prof. André Luiz Sena Guimarães Coordenadoria de Pós-graduação Lato-sensu: Prof. Divino Urias Mendonça Coordenadoria de Pós-graduação Stricto-sensu: Prof. Idenilson Meireles Barbosa PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS DA SAÚDE Coordenador: Prof. Alfredo Maurício Batista de Paula Subcoordenadora: Prof.ª Marise Fagundes Silveira RESUMO Considerando a influência das condições ambientais reinantes nas fitofisionomias de Campo Rupestre e Mata Seca, bem como suas associações com o estresse hídrico e sua vinculação indireta com a biossintese de metabolismos secundários, definiu-se estes ambientes para este estudo. Adicionalmente até o presente momento não há descrito bioprospecção dos microrganismos nestes ecosistemas. Objetivou-se através do presente trabalho caracterizar populações de actinobactérias endofíticas residentes em áreas de Mata Seca e Campo Rupestre, com fins de obtenção de substancias antimicrobianas com potencial antibiótico. As partes vegetais coletadas foram esterilizadas, fragmentadas, maceradas, suspensas e cultivadas em meios específicos para isolamento. As colônias com características fenotípicasde actinobactérias foramisoladas e identificadas por Maldi-Tof MS e genotipagem do gene 16S rRNA. O produto metabólico das actinobactérias endofíticas do Campo Rupestre foram obtidos por cultivo em dois meios em caldo e separado da massa celular por centrifugação e filtração. O fracionamento dos produtos metabólicos foi realizado com solventes não miscíveis em água e o teste de atividade antimicrobiana foi avaliada por microdiluição. As amostras coletadas das fitofisionomias permitiram o isolamento de 16 actinobactérias endofíticas da fitofisionomia Mata Seca e 8 do Campo Rupestre. O Maldi-Tof MS identificou com precisão quatro isolados e a genotipagem do gene 16S rRNA identificou um número de 20 isolados a nível de espécie. Os 16 produtos metabólicos não fracionados e os 48 fracionados foram submetidos ao teste de inibição, sendo que, desses apenas um produto metabólico fracionado apresentou atividade antimicrobiana contra Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25105 em uma baixa concentração. A coleção de actinobactérias endofíticas de ambas fitofisionomias apresentou uma diversidade de actinobactérias associada a versatilidade destas em colonizar diversas partes vegetais bem como as plantas em estudo. A actinobactéria Micromonospora aurantiaca, isolada do interior da raiz de uma planta do Campo Rupestre, produziu um produto metabólico com atividade antimicrobiana. Palavras-chave: Actinobacteria. Antibacterianos. Bioprospecção. Bactérias Gram-Positivas. ABSTRACT Considering the influence of the environmental conditions prevailing on the phytophysiognomies of Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest, as well as their associations with water stress and its indirect link with the biosynthesis of secondary metabolisms, these environments were defined for this study. In addition, up to the present moment there has been no description of the microorganisms in these ecosystems. The aim of this work was to characterize populations of endophytic actinobacteria residing in areas of Dry Tropical Forest and Brazilian Rocky Field, for the purpose of obtaining antimicrobial substances with antibiotic potential. The collected plant parts were sterilized, fragmented, macerated, suspended and cultured in specific media for isolation. The colonies with phenotypic features of actinobacteria were isolated and identified using Maldi-Tof MS and genotyping of the 16S rRNA gene. The metabolic product of rockhopper endophytic actinobacteria was obtained by culture in two media in broth and separated from the cell mass by centrifugation and filtration. The fractionation of the metabolic products was performed with non-water miscible solvents and the antimicrobial activity test was evaluated by microdilution. The samples collected from the phytophysiognomies made it possible to isolate 16 endophytic actinobacteria of the Dry Tropical Forest phytophysiognomy and 8 of the Brazilian Rocky Field one. Maldi-Tof MS accurately identified four isolates and the genotyping of the 16S rRNA gene identified a total of 20 isolates at the species level. The 16 non-fractionated metabolic products and the 48 fractions were subjected to the inhibition test, of which only one fractionated metabolic product presented antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus in a low concentration. The collection of endophytic actinobacteria from both phytophysiognomies showed a diversity of actinobacteria associated with their versatility in colonizing various plant parts as well as the plants under study. The actinobacterium Micromonospora aurantiaca, isolated from within the root of a plant of Brazilian Rocky Field, produced a metabolic product with antimicrobial activity. Keywords: Actinobacteria. Anti-Bacterial Agents. Bioprospecting. Gram-Positive Bacteria. SUMÁRIO 1 INTRODUÇÃO ........................................................................................................ 7 2 OBJETIVOS ............................................................................................................. 15 2.1 Objetivo Geral ........................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Objetivos Específicos ............................................................................................. 15 3 PRODUTOS ............................................................................................................. 16 3.1 Artigo 1: Endophytic Actinobacteria of Plants in the Bazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest of Northern Minas Gerais …......................................................... 17 3.2 Artigo 2: Antibiotic Potential of Metabolic Products of Endophytic Actinobacteria of the Bazilian Rocky Field in Minas Gerais - Brazil ........................... 31 4 CONCLUSÕES ........................................................................................................ 40 REFERÊNCIAS .......................................................................................................... 41 APÊNDICES ............................................................................................................... 48 ANEXOS ..................................................................................................................... 50 7 1 INTRODUÇÃO 1.1 Microrganismos endofíticos e actinobactérias Os microrganismos compõem uma das maiores fontes de diversidade genética disponível entres os seres vivos, no entanto, esta diversidade ainda se encontra pouco descrita e explorada (1). Dentre os microrganismos, podem ser destacadas as bactérias, que representam um dos três domínios (Archaea, Bacteria e Eucarya) da árvore filogenética atualmente (2). As bactérias apresentam longa história evolutiva, permitindo-lhes ocupar os mais diferentes nichos da biosfera, sendo encontradas em praticamente todos os ambientes terrestres. As mesmas representam a maior biomassa viva no planeta e são responsáveis por muitos processos essenciais para a manutenção da vida nas condições ambientais atuais. Esta grande diversidade genética e metabólica faz destes microrganismos uma fonte potencial de bioprodutos (3). Além da diversidade de espécies bacterianas, existe também a diversidade de genes presente dentro de uma espécie (4). Observa-se que a diversidade bacteriana não é estática, sendo observada uma alta capacidade reprodutiva, com ciclos vitais muito curtos, o que leva a alta capacidade adaptativa, com rápida alteração no perfil destas comunidades devido a alterações do ambiente (5). Além desta grande capacidade em perpetuar a espécie, baseada na rápida reprodução e adaptação, a capacidade de adquirir DNA por transferência lateral de genes, aumenta ainda mais a diversidade e consequentemente a adaptabilidade das bactérias aos ambientes terrestres (6). Além das bactérias associadas às plantas na região da rizosfera, existem também as bactérias que colonizam o interior da planta, as quais são denominadas de bactérias endofíticas. Uma definição mais abrangente de bactérias endofíticas é: bactérias isoladas de tecidos de plantas com superficie desinfectada (7). Utilizando uma definição mais completa, temos os endófitos definidos como microrganismos que colonizam os tecidos internos da planta, sem causar danos aparentes ao hospedeiro e sem produzir estruturas externas visíveis (8). Alguns critérios para reconhecimento de verdadeiros endófitos foram descritos (9), onde os autores destacam a importância não apenas do isolamento, mas também da posterior análise de colonização das plantas pelos isolados candidatos a endófitos. 8 As bactérias endofíticas possuem, da mesma forma que patógenos, a capacidade de penetrar na planta e colonizar de forma sistêmica o hospedeiro, podendo habitar o aplopasto, vasos condutores e ocasionalmente o meio intracelular (10). Com esta colonização sistêmica da planta, estas bactérias podem alterar as condições fisiológicas e morfológicas do hospedeiro, além de atuar sobre as populações de outros microrganismos presentes no interior da planta (11). Muitas revisões acessam tanto o comportamento ecológico, bem como as aplicações de bactérias endofíticas (7, 12, 13). A atividade endofítica no controle biológico pode ser resultado de vários fatores, como produção de antibióticos, promoção de crescimento e indução de resistência sistêmica (14). A produção de antibióticos é considerada um importante fator de antagonismo nas raízes, onde também atuam outros compostos, como enzimas que impedem o desenvolvimento de patógenos. Foi constatado também o controle de patógenos por parasitismo, onde uma linhagem de Burkholderia cepacia, isolada de aspargos colonizou os espaços intercelulares de raízes de banana, levando ao controle de Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense (15). Os autores observaram in vitro, que essa bactéria coloniza a superfície da hifa do patógeno, causando protuberâncias, que resultam em deformação do micélio e consequente redução no potencial patogênico do fungo. Em tomate, a aplicação da bactéria Pseudomonas sp. (linhagem PsJN) induziu resistência sistêmica a Verticilium dahliae, mostrando que a colonização do endófito é capaz de ativar o sistema defesa da planta, resultando na resistência ao patógeno (16, 17). Alguns autores sugerem que a penetração ativa da bactéria endofítica no hospedeiro, com hidrólise de celulose, pode causar uma reação de hipersensibilidade, ativando os mecanismos de defesa da planta (10). O gênero Methylobacterium também é descrito como endofítico de plantas, sendo encontrado em muitas espécies, como citros (18, 19), pinus (20), crotalaria (21), arroz (14) e amendoim (22). Além de endófitos, as espécies do gênero Methylobacterium ocupam também outros habitats, incluindo solo, água, superfícies de folha, nódulos, grãos, ar entre outros. Estudos anteriores têm demonstrado que Methylobacterium spp. coloniza ativamente a superfície de folhas (23). Em citros, espécies de Methylobacterium têm sido consistentemente isoladas como endofítico de ramos (19, 24), e nesta planta esta população interage com o patógeno Xylella fastidiosa (19). Espécies do gênero Methylobacterium são descritas como promotoras de crescimento vegetal (25) ou indutoras de resistência sistêmica (22). 9 A espécie M. extorquens também é amplamente encontrada em associação com as plantas, sendo recentemente estudada com abordagem proteômica (26), onde os autores identificaram proteínas exclusivamente expressas por esta espécie quando colonizando a filosfera de plantas. Dentre as proteínas diferencialmente quantificadas foram verificadas as presenças de proteínas de resposta a estresse, além de dois domínios de resposta, PhyR e um fator C-terminal, sendo este último referente a um mecanismo de resposta presente apenas em bactérias pertencentes à classe α-proteobactéria (26). As actinobactérias são bactérias filamentosas Gram-positivas, que apresentam DNA rico em guanina e citosina (G+C > 72%, no gênero Streptomyces e G+C de 64 a 72% no gênero Nocardia) possuindo a capacidade de formar hifas em algum estágio de seu desenvolvimento e apresentando grande diversidade de características morfológicas (27). As colônias de actinobactérias são formadas por uma massa de hifas, constituindo o micélio. Essa massa é formada a partir do desenvolvimento inicial de esporos, esporângios ou fragmentos de hifas em meio sólido, constituindo primeiramente o micélio vegetativo, de caráter hidrofílico. Algumas estirpes de actinobactérias diferenciam seu micélio vegetativo em micélio aéreo, de caráter hidrofóbico, o que provoca uma alteração nas características morfogenéticas, fisiológicas e ultraestruturas (28). Esses microrganismos estão amplamente distribuídos em ambientes naturais, como por exemplo, nos rios, nos mares e na atmosfera, porém o solo é o seu reservatório mais comum (29). Eles têm sido descritos como os principais produtores de antibióticos no solo, e também como um dos principais grupos microbianos produtores de enzimas de interesse comercial (30, 31). A instabilidade genética é uma característica bastante encontrada nas actinobactérias, podendo a frequência de mutação chegar a pelo menos 1 em cada 103 células no gênero Streptomyces. Assim sendo, a maioria das características fenotípicas relacionadas à diferenciação e metabolismo secundário são geneticamente mutáveis, tais como: formação de micélio aéreo, pigmentação, esporulação, resistência a agentes genotóxicos e resistência e/ou produção de antibióticos e enzimas (27). 10 A heterogeneidade bioquímica das actinobactérias, sua diversidade ecológica e sua capacidade para a produção de metabólitos secundários os fazem um bom grupo para a investiação de enzimas que desempenham novas atividades e/ou especificicas (32). As enzimas produzidas pelas actinobactérias são capazes de degradar compostos nitrogenados orgânicos, carboidratos, vários esteróides como colesterol, uma variedade de compostos aromáticos, acetileno e muitos outros. Estudos recentes vêm apontando as actinobactérias como fontes emergentes de uma ampla faixa de importantes enzimas de interesse industrial e ambiental (32, 33). 1.2 Fitofisionomia - Mata Seca As Florestas Estacionais Deciduais (FED) são caracterizadas por um elevado grau de deciduidade foliar em sua estrutura arbórea e estão distribuídas pelas mais diversas regiões tropicais (34). Apresenta duas estações anuais bem definidas, seca e chuvosa (35, 36), que associadas ao potencial hídrico, temperatura e ainda suas características físicas e químicas permitem uma diversidade de respostas fisionômicas distintas sobre a vegetação (34). A ocorrência das FED nas regiões tropicais recebe uma denominação em escala global de: Florestas Tropicais Secas. No mundo inteiro, cerca de 42% das florestas tropicais se enquadram na definição de Florestas Tropicais Secas. Sua distribuição global pode ocorrer desde a América do Sul e Central até a África, Ásia e Oceania (35, 37), todavia, o conhecimento sobre elas ainda é limitado, implicando na necessidade de mais pesquisas (38, 39). No Brasil, as Florestas Tropicais Secas podem ser encontradas fragmentadas e isoladas ou imersas em zonas de transição como no nordeste, entre Cerrado e Caatinga, no norte entre Caatinga e Amazônia e na região centro-oeste entre o Pantanal e a Amazônia (40, 41). E especificamente no norte de Minas Gerais, as Florestas Tropicais Secas são habitualmente conhecidas como “Matas Secas”. Estas formações estão presentes dentro dos domínios do Cerrado e Caatinga, sendo influenciadas na sua fitofisionomia por estes biomas (42). Embora ocorram outros biomas em Minas Gerais, na região norte o bioma dominante é o Cerrado. Caracteristicamente o Cerrado possui diferentes fitofisionomias, como o cerradão, cerrado (strictu sensu), campo cerrado, campo sujo e campo limpo (43), que ainda engloba as 11 Matas Secas como parte das fitofisionomias do Cerrado. Este bioma, como todos os outros, vem ao longo dos anos sendo explorado exaustivamente (44-46). Uma das principais causas da destruição e consequente perda da biodiversidade do Cerrado é a remoção da vegetação nativa para a implantação de empreendimentos agrícolas e pecuários (47). As Matas Secas norte mineiras têm sofrido com essas alterações antrópicas, sobretudo sob a forma de atividades agropastoris. Um dos agravantes para essas áreas é que elas ocorrem em solos férteis favoráveis à agricultura (48), o que contribui com sua rápida ocupação. Igualmente, áreas de Matas Secas que em grande parte estão associadas aos afloramentos de calcário (36, 49) também são exploradas por fábricas, principalmente as de cimentos (50). Pouca atenção era dada a esta formação fitofisionômica, entretanto, isto começa a ser modificado com o aparecimento de trabalhos sobre composição, estrutura e dinâmica ecológica das Matas Secas (38, 39, 51-53). Contribuindo assim com informações relevantes para compreensão dessa complexa estrutura. 1.3 Fitofisionomia - Campo Rupestre Os Campos Rupestres e de altitude ocorrem, principalmente, nos topos das montanhas do leste do Brasil, sendo reconhecidos como importantes centros de endemismo da flora e da fauna neotropical (54-57). Em 1867, o botânico dinamarquês Johannes Eugenius Büllow Warming apresentou um mapa das regiões fitogeográficas do Brasil, no qual destacou, pela primeira vez, as vegetações de Campos Rupestres e de altitude como uma formação à parte do Cerrado e da Mata Atlântica, denominando esses tipos vegetacionais de topos de montanha mais elevados cobertos por uma flora alpina (58). Uma obra original de 1904 descreve a vegetação do sul do Brasil (59), apresentou informações sobre os campos de altitude do Itatiaia, ressaltando a ocorrência de taquaras do gênero Chusquea e de algumas famílias botânicas características desta região. 12 O naturalista mineiro Alvaro Astolpho da Silveira, um dos pioneiros nos estudos taxonômicos da família Eriocaulaceae nas serras brasileiras, não aplicou uma denominação específica para as formações abertas desta região, usando termos como “campo”, “campo limpo”, “campo alpestre” e “campo alpino” (60, 61). Entretanto, este autor sugeriu nomes a serem aplicados a certos tipos de ambientes restritos a estas regiões, tais como “chusqueal”, em referência a aglomerados de taquaras do gênero Chusquea nas partes mais altas da Serra do Caparaó (60), e “campos de eriocaulaceas”, na Serra do Cipó (61, 62). Alguns autores denominaram a vegetação aberta dos topos de montanha do leste brasileiro de “campos alpinos” (63, 64), possivelmente seguindo a sugestão de Gonzaga de Campos (65). Esses campos, na região sul do estado de Minas Gerais, já foram considerados como uma única unidade, sugerindo o nome de “savana especial dos altos divisores” (62, 66). O termo “Campos Rupestres” definindo a vegetação ocorrente nos topos de montanha ao longo da Cadeia do Espinhaço foi usado primeiramente por dois autores (67, 68). Entretanto, foi considerou como “Campos Rupestres” tanto o tipo de vegetação ocorrente nas partes mais elevadas das serras de Minas Gerais e Goiás (sobre quartzito ou arenito), quanto nos topos das serras do Caparaó, dos Órgãos e do Itatiaia (sobre rochas ígneas ou metamórficas), sugerindo que não há diferença na classificação das vegetações abertas dos topos de montanha do leste e do centro do Brasil (62, 68). Em geral, os Campos Rupestres ocorrem principalmente acima de 1.000 m de altitude, em montanhas cujas rochas são de origem pré-cambriana que foram remodeladas por movimentos tectônicos a partir do Paleógeno, estando associados, principalmente, a afloramentos de quartzito, arenito e minério de ferro (68-71). Estes campos encontram-se distribuídos principalmente ao longo da Cadeia do Espinhaço, embora áreas isoladas desse tipo de vegetação também sejam encontradas nas serras do Brasil Central (e.g., Chapada dos Veadeiros, Serras dos Pirineus e da Canastra) ou em montanhas da região de São João Del Rei (Serra do Lenheiro), Tiradentes (Serra de São José) e Itutinga, consideradas como pertencentes à Serra da Mantiqueira, mas com geologia e afinidades florísticas mais relacionadas aos Campos Rupestres da Cadeia do Espinhaço (70, 72, 73). Em geral, os Campos Rupestres da Cadeia do Espinhaço estão situados em áreas de transição entre o Cerrado, a Caatinga e a Mata Atlântica (71, 74). Estima-se que na porção sul da Cadeia 13 do Espinhaço, na Serra do Cipó, MG ocorra cerca de 3000 espécies vegetais identificadas, sendo um terço destas de ocorrência exclusiva (75). Devido às fortes pressões antrópicas exercidas neste ecossistema, muitas espécies de Campo Rupestre estão em vias de extinção (76), e já compreendem cerca de 70% das espécies de plantas consideradas ameaçadas no estado de Minas Gerais (77). A elevada diversidade e o alto grau de endemismos encontrados nos Campos Rupestres sempre estiveram associados a este mosaico de habitats e suas singularidades, principalmente quanto às características dos solos que suportam esta biodiversidade (78-83). De modo geral estes habitats ocorrem em solos arenosos, fino ou cascalhentos, rasos, ácidos e pobres em nutrientes. A baixa fertilidade natural destes solos tem sido indicada por alguns estudos recentes que oferecem dados quantitativos dos teores nutricionais destes solos (78, 81, 84-86). Além disso, estudos vêm demostrando que a baixa fertilidade natural destes solos é fundamental para a manutenção de espécies nativas, principalmente das consideradas endêmicas (85-87) já que as mesmas, em geral, estão associadas a tipos específicos do solo (86). Apesar da generalização dessa unidade florística os Campos Rupestres apresentam uma elevada heterogeneidade espacial incluindo um mosaico de habitats muito próximos entre si (81-83). Os habitats são diferenciados pela configuração do solo, continuidade da vegetação, composição florística, proporção de rocha exposta, presença de blocos de rocha e de sedimentos arenosos. Além disso, na estação chuvosa alguns destes habitats que constitui o mosaico dos Campos Rupestres podem permanecer secos enquanto outros permanecem encharcados, constituindo um sistema bastante heterogêneo (80-82). A partir da descoberta da actinomicina em 1940 e da estreptomicina, a primeira droga realmente efetiva para o tratamento da tuberculose, em 1943, as actinobactérias tornaram-se famosos como produtores de antibióticos e outros metabólitos secundários com atividade biológica. A maioria dos antibióticos empregados atualmente foi isolada de actinobactérias provenientes do solo. Entretanto, actinobactérias endofíticas tem-se mostrado promissores como produtores de antibióticos. Antibióticos de amplo espectro (munumbicinas) são produzidos por 14 Streptomyces sp. NRRL30562, um endofítico de K. nigriscans. Estes antibióticos demonstram atividade contra bactérias Gram-positivas, tais como Bacillus anthracis e Mycobacterium tuberculosis multiresistente a drogas. Munumbicina D, também é ativa contra Plasmodium falciparum. Streptomyces sp. NRRL30566 endofítico de Grevillea pteridifolia produz kakadumicina. Kakadumicina A apresenta amplo espectro, especialmente entre bactérias Gram- positivas, também inibe P. falciparum (88). Coronamicinas, um complexo de peptídeos novos, foi isolado de Streptomyces sp. endofíticos de Monstera sp. e desempenha atividade bioativa contra Cryptococcus neoformans e P. falciparum (89). Ação sinérgica de metabólitos secundários tem sido observada em Streptomyces sp.. Combinações de antibióticos β-lactâmicos e inibidores da β-lactamase são conhecidos por serem efetivos contra bactérias resistentes a β-lactâmicos. Streptomyces clavuligerus, Streptomyces jumonjinensis e Streptomyces katsurahamanus todos produzem ácido clavulâmico e também produzem cefamicina C (um β-lactâmico). Streptomyces graminofaciens e Streptomyces loidensis têm sido relatados por coproduzir estreptogramina tipo A e B. Estreptogramina A ou B sozinha tem efeito bacteriostático e juntas têm efeito bacteriocida (90). As infecções fúngicas, além dos problemas relacionados com a resistência a compostos antifúngicos ainda há o relacionado com a toxidez apresentada pela maioria destes compostos. Na literatura a anfotericina B é aplicada no tratamento de infecções causadas por Blastomyces sp., Candida sp., Cryptococcus sp. e Histoplasma sp. causa nefrotoxidade, redução do fluxo de sangue renal, náuseas, vômito e anorexia (91). Nistatina, aplicada para candidíase também é tóxica no uso sistêmico e griseofulvina causa hepatotoxidade e dores abdominais. Devido à crescente aquisição de resistência por microrganismos patogênicos, a busca de novas substâncias com atividade antimicrobiana cresce juntamente com as pesquisas nesta área. 15 2 OBJETIVOS 2.1 Objetivo geral Caracterizar populações de actinobactérias endofíticas residentes em áreas de Mata Seca e Campo Rupestre, com fins de obtenção de substâncias antimicrobianas com potencial antibiótico. 2.2 Objetivos específicos Constituir uma coleção de actinobactérias endofíticas isoladas em plantas pertencentes às fitofisionomiasMata seca e Campo Rupestre de Minas Gerais. Genotipar as actinobactérias endofíticas obtidas. Avaliar os isolados de actinobactérias para atividade antimicrobiana contra bactérias e levedura patogênicas a espécie humana. Identificar a concentração com efeito inibitório das frações dos produtos do metabolismo. 16 3 PRODUTOS 3.1 Produto 1: Endophytic Actinobacteria of Plants in the Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest of Northern Minas Gerais. - Brazilian Journal of Microbiology enviado. 3.2 Produto 2: Antibiotic Potential of Metabolic Products of Endophytic Actinobacteria of the Brazilian Rocky Field in Minas Gerais - Brazil. - Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry enviado. 17 3.1 PRODUTO 1 Endophytic Actinobacteria of Plants in the Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest of Northern Minas Gerais Lucas Oliveira Barros1, Ronize Viviane Jorge Brito1, Ludmilla Louise Cerqueira Maia Prates1, Thaís Tiemi Yoshinaga1, Lorena Santos Rocha Silva1, Ana Cristina de Carvalho Botelho1, Sérgio Avelino Mota Nobre1,*. 1 Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biocontrol of Microorganisms, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil * Corresponding author: S.A.M. Nobre. Telephone number: +55(38)999726828 E-mail: sergio.nobre01@gmail.com Abstract: The Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest areas in the state of Minas Gerais are important endemic centers, and endophytic actinobacteria were first studied in these phytophysiognomies because they make countless natural products, including antibiotics, antitumor agents, enzymes and immunosuppressing agents. The purpose of this work was to build a collection of endophytic actinobacteria that reside in Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest areas. The collected plant parts were macerated, suspended and cultivated in specific isolation media. The colonies with phenotypic features of actinobacteria were isolated and identified using Maldi- Tof MS and genotyping of the 16S rRNA gene. The samples collected from the phytophysiognomies made it possible to isolate 16 endophytic actinobacteria of the Dry Tropical Forest phytophysiognomy and 8 of the Brazilian Rocky Field one. Maldi-Tof MS accurately identified four isolates and the genotyping of the 16S rRNA gene identified a total of 20 isolates at the species level. The collection of endophytic actinobacteria of the Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest phytophysiognomies presented a diversity of actinobacteria associated to their versatility when it comes to colonizing different plants and plant parts. Keywords: Bioprospection, Isolation, Actinomycetes, Cerrado 18 Introduction Brazilian Rocky Field (literally “rocky fields”) occur mostly on the tops of mountains in eastern Brazil and are acknowledged as important endemic centers of neotropical flora and fauna [1-4]. The Dry Tropical Forest of northern Minas Gerais are fertile regions that have been suffering with anthropic alterations, mostly due to agriculture and livestock farming [5], which contribute to its rapid occupation. Endophytic organisms are considered an important component of biodiversity. The term “endophytic” was coined by De Bary [6] and its definition has evolved over time; the most accurate one is “fungi, bacteria and protozoans that, either throughout their life or during part of it, invade the tissues of living plants and cause unnoticed and asymptomatic infections, but cause no disease” [7-12]. The beneficial interactions between endophytic bacteria and host plants have been studied before [13-15]. More recently, studies began on endophytic actinobacteria as well [16,17]. The Actinobacteria phylum contains a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria with high guanine and cytosine contents (G + C) in their DNA [18]. Actinobacteria are found in natural habitats such as soil, sweet water basins, marine habitats, atmosphere and plant tissues [18-20], and have a remarkable ability to produce different natural products, including antibiotics, antitumor agents, enzymes and immunosuppressing agents [21-24]. In the past few years, endophytic actinobacteria have been attracting significant interest due to their ability to produce a wide range of secondary metabolites that can be beneficial for the host plants, promoting their growth and health [25,24,26]. Researchers are increasingly interested in the bioprospection of endophytic microbial communities that inhabit the plants of various ecosystems. Our purpose with this work was to build a collection of endophytic actinobacteria that reside in Bazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest areas. Materials and methods Collecting plant samples The collection points for the plant parts are located in the northern region of the state of Minas Gerais, phytophysiognomically characterized as Brazilian Rocky Field in the municipality of Itacambira and as Dry Tropical Forest in the municipalities of Januária and Montes Claros, all within the state of Minas Gerais. Samples were collected in a random fashion, including leaf stems and whole leaves without predatory action. All plant parts collected were sent to the Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biocontrol of Microorganisms (LEBM) of the Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES) for the subsequent assays. Isolating endophytic microorganisms The collected plant parts were rinsed and their surfaces sterilized as described in a previously [27] then dried on sterile absorbent paper, after which they were fragmented and weighed. The verification of the disinfection process was made by inoculating three batches of 1 mL each from the last rinsing water of the samples in dishes containing Czapek Dox (CZP) agar and incubated at 30°C for 72 hours [28]. The endophytic actinobacteria were isolated by macerating the plant parts, using chemically sterilized grade and pistil. The maceration product was suspended in a ratio of 10-1 m/v of sterile water (ADE). Aliquots of the maceration product were distributed on the surface of four culture media, Nutrient Starch Ammonia Agar (MAAN) [29]; Starch Casein Agar (SCN) [30]; M615 Agar [31]; Czapek Dox Agar (CZP) [29] with Drigalski spatula and incubated at 28ºC ± 1ºC [32]. The colonies with characteristics typical of actinobacteria were isolated in pure cultures using successive subcultures in new dishes containing the original media. The incubation temperature was kept at 28ºC ± 1ºC and the time varied according to growth; maximum estimated time: 15 days [33]. The pure cultures were preserved in Czapek Dox broth with 40% glycerol and kept in an ultra-freezer at -80ºC [34]. Phenotypic characterization of actinobacteria The endophytic actinobacteria were cultivated and taken to micro cultivation on CZP agar as described previously for morphologic characterization [35]. The aerial mycelia and the reproductive structures in addition to the inner mycelium in the substrate were visualized using microphotography [36]. 19 Maldi-Tof MS identification of actinobacteria isolates The endophytic actinobacteria isolates were cultivated in CZP and incubated at 28° C ± 1º C for 15 days. A single fresh colony of each actinobacteria was smeared on a target steel dish with a stick. For each strain, 1 μL of formic acid (70%) and 1 μL of Maldi-Tof MS matrix, consisting of a saturated solution of -cyano-4- hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), was applied in the area and left to dry. The specters were acquired using the mass spectrometer FlexControl MicroFlex LT (Bruker Daltonics) with a 60-Hz nitrogen laser. Before the measurements, calibration was preceded by a bacterial test pattern (E. coli DH5 alpha; Bruker Daltonics). The real time (RT) identification score used the criteria recommended by the manufacturer: scores ≥ 2,000 indicate identification at species level; scores ≥1,700 and <2,000 indicate identification at a genus level; scores <1,700 indicate absence of reliable identification [37]. Genotyping of actinobacteria isolates The actinobacteria were cultivated in CZP agar dishes. A cell spatula was used to extract DNA with DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (50) by Qiagen (Cat No./ID: 69504). The 16S rRNA genes were amplified with the primers C70 - AGAGTTTGATYMTGGC Forward and B37 - TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGA Reverse. Ten microliters of the raw DNA and 1 M of the primers were added to the reaction mixture, whose final volume was 82 L. The following conditions were used for the amplification: denaturation at 94º C for 45 s, annealing at 50º C for 45 s and elongation at 72º C for 45 s, with 5 s added for each elongation phase. A total of 25 cycles were run, followed by a final elongation phase at 72º C for 15 min. The pureness of the amplified product was determined by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel (FMC Bioproducts). The DNA was stained with ethidium bromide and observed under shortwave UV light [38]. The amplified DNA was purified through precipitation with polyethylene glycol 8000. After the removal of Ampliwax, 0.6 volume was added (20% of polyethylene glycol 8000) (Sigma) to NaCl 2.5 M, and the mixture was incubated at 37° C for 10 minutes. The sample was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 15,000 x g and the sediment was rinsed with ethanol (80%) and sedimented as previously described. The sediment was air dried and dissolved in 30 mL of distilled water, then used for sequencing [38]. The PCR DNA sample was directly sequenced with a cycle sequencing kit (TAQuence Cycle Sequencing Kit; United States Biochemical Corp.). The manufacturer’s protocol was followed. The eight sequencing primers are shown in Table 1. The starters were marked in their extremities using 33P (Dupont, NEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Approximately 100 ng of purified PCR DNA were used for the sequencing [38]. Table 1. Primers used for sequencing. Primers B12 – TGGCGCACGGGTGAGTAA FORWARD C31 – GGAATCGCTAGTAATCG FORWARD X88 – GTATTAATCACCGTTTC REVERSO B34 – RCTGCTGCCTCCCGT REVERSO B35 – GTRTTACCGCGGCTGCTG REVERSO B36 – GGACTACCAGGGTATCTA REVERSO C01 – GGTTGCGCTCGTTGCGGG REVERSO X91 – CCCGGGAACGTATTCACCG REVERSO The sequencing products generated the contigs per isolate of endophytic actinobacteria. The identity was assessed using the BLAST web server (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) [39]. The evolutive history was inferred through the Minimum Evolution method [40]. The percentages of the replicated trees in which it grouped the rates associated in the bootstrap test (1,000 copies) are displayed near the ramifications [41]. The evolution distances were calculated using the Kimura 2 parameter method [42] and are expressed in units of the number of base substitution per locus. The Molecular Evolution tree was researched using the Close-Neighbor-Interchange (CNI) [43] with research level 1. The Neighbor-joining algorithm [44] was used to generate the initial tree. Evolution analysis were carried out with MEGA X [45]. 20 Results The figures regarding the climatic conditions of the three collection points for the plant parts on the day of collection are represented in Table 2. Table 2. Sample collection points and weather parameters observed in the sample collection period. Collection pointA Precipitation (mm) Maximum temperature (ºC) Minimum temperature (ºC) RH (%) Location Januária 0.0 35.4 17.3 57.75 S15º56'82,6'' - W044º45'81,9'' Itacambira 0.0 28.4 13.8 67.75 S17°00'03,2'' - W043°33'62,6'' Montes Claros 13.6 32.6 19.0 40.00 S16°74'21,5'' - W043°89'99,9'' Source: INMET - Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia (www.inmet.gov.br) A Municipalities in the state of Minas Gerais - Brazil Plant parts of eight plants of the Brazilian Rocky Field phytophysiognomy and the roots of three of these plants were collected, for a total of 19 samples. Even though the collection was carried out during a season of the year in which it does not rain often (July), the area was very humid due to the presence of creeks. As a result, the plants were in a good development phase. Parts of 21 plants of the Dry Tropical Forest phytophysiognomy were collected between April and October; the region was in its dry season, when leaves fall or have already fallen. The result was 32 samples of the phytophysiognomy. The disinfection process was successful. After the maceration of the plant parts and the successive sub cultivations of colonies with characteristics typical of actinobacteria, the final yield was 263 pure cultures, of which 87 came from Dry Tropical Forest and 176 from Brazilian Rocky Field. No antifungal agent was used in the isolation medium, as it might have inhibited the growth of actinobacteria; as a consequence, many filamentous fungi grew in the medium, which made it harder to isolate the cultures due to their quick growth in the plates. The microcultivation made it possible to visualize the structures that are typical of actinobacteria, which helped define the microorganisms with structures typical of actinobacteria. Of the 263 pure cultures of endophytic microorganisms, 16 were actinobacteria originally from Dry Tropical Forest and 8 of phytophysiognomies of Brazilian Rocky Field (Table 3). There was a higher number of isolates of endophytic bacteria of Sample2, belonging to the genus Lychnophora. More endophytic actinobacteria were isolated in the roots of the plants of the Brazilian Rocky Field phytophysiognomy, and in the stems of plants of the Dry Tropical Forest phytophysiognomy, due to the fact that more stems were collected and because of fallen leaves. SCN and MAAN were the best media to isolate actinobacteria, 10 and 7 isolates, respectively. The use of different media made it possible to acquire more isolates, but no association was observed in terms of specialization of endophytic actinobacteria regarding the medium used for the isolation. The M615 agar was only capable to isolate a member of the genus Streptomyces. The analysis of the collection of endophytic actinobacteria by Maldi-Tof MS was only able to accurately identify one isolate at the species level (Micromonospora aurantiaca) but managed to accurately identify three other isolates at the genus level (Nocardia, Streptomyces and Streptococcus) according to the score used that is significant for identification (Table 3). The other isolates of endophytic actinobacteria did not present a significant corresponding score for identification at the level of genus and species with the data available in Maldi-Tof MS, and two isolates (Act 5 and Act 20) did not show spectral peaks for analysis. 21 Table 3. Collection of endophytic actinobacteria of Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest. Isolated Code Sample CodeA Phytophysiognimy Insulation mediumB ACT 1 Sample1 (R) Brazilian Rocky Field SCN ACT 2 Sample2 (H) Brazilian Rocky Field SCN ACT 3 Sample2 (R) Brazilian Rocky Field MAAN ACT 4 Sample2 (R) Brazilian Rocky Field M615 ACT 5 Sample2 (R) Brazilian Rocky Field SCN ACT 6 Sample3 (F) Brazilian Rocky Field M615 ACT 7 Sample3 (R) Brazilian Rocky Field MAAN ACT 8 Sample4 (H) Brazilian Rocky Field SCN ACT 9 Sample5 (H) Dry Tropical Forest MAAN ACT 10 Sample6 (H) Dry Tropical Forest MAAN ACT 11 Sample7 (H) Dry Tropical Forest SCN ACT 12 Sample8 (H) Dry Tropical Forest CZA ACT 13 Sample8 (H) Dry Tropical Forest SCN ACT 14 Sample8 (H) Dry Tropical Forest CZA ACT 15 Sample9 (H) Dry Tropical Forest CZA ACT 16 Sample9 (H) Dry Tropical Forest MAAN ACT 17 Sample10 (H) Dry Tropical Forest CZA ACT 18 Sample10 (H) Dry Tropical Forest M615 ACT 19 Sample10 (H) Dry Tropical Forest SCN ACT 20 Sample11 (H) Dry Tropical Forest MAAN ACT 21 Sample11 (H) Dry Tropical Forest SCN ACT 22 Sample12 (H) Dry Tropical Forest MAAN ACT 23 Sample12 (H) Dry Tropical Forest SCN ACT 24 Sample13 (H) Dry Tropical Forest SCN A Relative to the plant that hosts the isolate and the sampled plant structure. (H: stems, F: leaves, R: roots) B MAAN = Nutrient Ammonia Starch Agar [29]; CZA = Czapek Dox Agar [29]; SCN = Starch Casein Agar [30]; M615 = M615 Agar [31]. The taxonomic identification of the isolates of the collection of endophytic actinobacteria is also in Table 4, which shows that 6 different phylotypes were observed in the collection. It was not possible to sequence four of the isolates of endophytic actinobacteria (Act 8, Act 13, Act 17 and Act 19) due to the non-amplification of the genetic material. However, Figure 1 shows that these isolates present morphologic structures (spores, sporangium or hypha fragments) typical of the actinobacteria group. The phylogenetic analysis showed two different groups of Streptomyces sp., one more internal and another more external (Figure 2). The outermost group contains strains that are more distantly related to the other groups, and the HBUM174061 strain of Streptomyces niveoruber was the most distant of them all. Another inner group formed with other species, but their sequences were not far apart. The phylogenetic tree in Figure 2 was improved with the sample parameters (plant of origin), plant part (H – stems, F – leaves, R – root) and phytophysiognomy of origin. This phylogenetic association with the parameters mentioned showed co-habitation of the root of Sample2 by the genus Amycolatopsis, but no evidence was found of the association of endophytic actinobacteria with the plant and the plant part of origin. The phylogenetic tree also showed the diversity of isolates of the Streptomyces genus in the collection of endophytic actinobacteria and highlighted this genus’s ability to colonize different plant species as well as the plants of the phytophysiognomies under study. 22 Figure 1. Microphotographs of the microcultivation of isolates Act 8 (A), Act 13 (B), Act 17 (C) and Act 19 (D), showing structures typical of the group of actinobacteria (the arrows indicate spores, sporangium or hypha fragments). The morphologic characterization by microcultivation was not accurate enough for identification, but it was very efficiently early on to determine whether the isolate belonged to the group of actinobacteria. Maldi-Tof MS proved to be a very promising technique for the identification of actinobacteria, due to its low benefi-cost ratio regarding DNA sequencing. The identification obtained through the two techniques shows a correspondence pattern of more than 50%, but the database used in the Maldi-Tof MS is still too scarce for the group of actinobacteria, which made it impossible to identify a higher number of species with precision. The taxonomic identification of endophytic actinobacteria through the sequencing of gene 16s rRNA was the most satisfactory method as gold standard for the identification of species: in addition to yielding a higher number of identifications, it also showed more reliable results. 23 Table 4. Taxonomic identification, through the sequencing of gene 16S rRNA and Maldi-Tof MS, of endophytic actinobacteria originally from the phytophysiognomies of Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest of the northern region of the state of e Minas Gerais, Brazil. Isolate Code Identification through genetic sequencing Maldi-Tof identification Maldi-Tof Score A Act 1 Streptomyces pactum strain JG 5 Streptomyces 1.676 Act 2 Nocardia sp. strain 7K517 Nocardia 1.795 Act 3 Amycolatopsis sp. 102113 Amycolatopsis 1.674 Act 4 Streptomyces sp. strain ZZ745 Streptomyces/Actinomyces/Nocardia 1.344 Act 5 Amycolatopsis sp. R12-7 ND < 0 Act 6 Streptomyces olivaceus strain Fole3 Streptomyces 1.531 Act 7 Micromonospora aurantiaca strain HQB393 Micromonospora 2.137 Act 8 ND Lactobacillus/Rhizobium 1.495 Act 9 Streptomyces cinereoruber Streptomyces 1.569 Act 10 Streptomyces albus strain NRRL B-1811 Streptomyces 1.53 Act 11 Streptomyces sp. D10 Streptomyces 1.92 Act 12 Streptomyces niveoruber strain HBUM174061 Streptomyces 1.339 Act 13 ND Agromyces/Actinocorallia 1.347 Act 14 Streptomyces niveoruber strain 173843 Streptomyces 1.284 Act 15 Nocardiopsis synnemataformans strain BK21 Kitasatospora/Nocardiopsis 1.369 Act 16 Saccharopolyspora sp. strain 5K548 Saccharopolyspora 1.483 Act 17 ND Rothia 1.301 Act 18 Streptomyces sp. ZG637 Streptomyces/Nocardia 1.597 Act 19 ND Nocardia 1.185 Act 20 Streptomyces sp. strain XY006 ND < 0 Act 21 Saccharopolyspora sp. strain DC11 Streptococcus 1.913 Act 22 Saccharopolyspora gloriosae strain S79 Streptomyces 1.293 Act 23 Streptomyces sp. strain 16K210 Magnusiomyces 1.271 Act 24 Streptomyces flavoviridis strain SF 1 Streptomyces 1.489 A Score value: ≥ 2.000 identification at species level; between ≥1.700 and <2.000 identification at genus level; <1.700 non-reliable identification. ND Not defined 24 Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree based on the sequences of gene 16S rRNA from the collection of endophytic actinobacteria resident in Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest. The units of the distances are the same evolution units used to build the phylogenetic tree. The analysis involved 20 nucleotide sequences. The codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Non-Codifier. All ambiguous positions were removed for each pair of sequences. There was a total of 1598 positions in the ensemble of final data. Discussion Actinobacteria have a cosmopolitan distribution. They can be found anywhere, from the soil to the interior of plants in various ecosystems, and one study mentions the Cerrado as an important area (a hot spot) for plant diversity, in particular medicinal plants, sources of investigation for the isolation of associated actinomycetes [46]. The literature has already defined that the main invasion starting point for endophytic actinobacteria is the roots, from where it spreads to other parts of the host plant, [47] and it also discusses the need to explore the endophytic actinobacteria that live in association with plant tissues, as this is a little known area when compared with the soils [48-51] where these bacteria play various beneficial roles [52]. Some authors believe that the species, the age and the type of tissue (stems, leaves and roots) of plants, their geographic distribution and their location in their habitat, the season in which the sample was collected, the sterilization of the surface, selective cultivation media and culture conditions may all directly influence the isolation of endophytic actinobacteria [53-55]. Endophytic actinobacteria were mainly isolated from roots, followed by stems and then leaves [56,23]. Our study collected the root of only three plant species, but these were significant samples for the obtaining of endophytic actinobacteria. The fact that actinobacteria use soil as recurrent habitats supports the hypothesis of higher contact with plant roots, which allows them to form symbiotic associations once they enter the plant tissues [54]. We learned that using four different types of growth media was crucial for the isolation of endophytic actinobacteria, and the literature has described different types of media for this purpose [54,57]. The experiments were carried out without the use of antifungal agents in the isolation media. However, Kim et al. used cycloheximide and nystatin to avoid the growth of fungi during the process of actinobacteria isolation [58]. Actinobacteria identification is currently based on morphological, physiological and molecular studies of isolates [35]. Morphological identification was not satisfactory for all the endophytic actinobacteria of the collection. The work of Mohamed et al. made a preliminary identification of Streptomyces sp. using morphologic, biochemic and physiologic tests, in addition to mass spectrometry (Maldi-Tof MS) [59]. Kampapongsa and Kaewkla investigated the endophytic actinobacteria of rice (Oryza sativa) and analyzed the morphology of colonies and spores, together with the sequencing of gene 16S rRNA to identify all isolates [18]. 25 Maldi-Tof MS was not efficient in accurately identifying all the isolated endophytic actinobacteria due to the scarcity of information in the database regarding the group of actinobacteria, but several works use it to identify actinobacteria because it is a fast, low-cost and highly effective technique [60-62,59]. The best identification tool was the genotyping of the DNA of the isolates in the collection. Different studies used the sequencing of gene 16S rRNA for the phylogenetic testing and the identification of the community of endophytic actinobacteria of the following plant species: medicinal plant Maytenus austroyunnanensis, which comes from a Chinese tropical rainforest [63], medicinal plant Gynura cusimbua, which has preventive effects on high blood pressure, coronary disease, Alzheimer’s disease and atherosclerosis [48], Dracaena cochinchinensis Lour., an important plant used in traditional Chinese medicine [64], and isolates of sterilized roots of Chinese cabbage [65]. We isolated and identified 24 endophytic actinobacteria of plants of the phytophysiognomies Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest. Qin et al. managed to isolate a total of 257 endophytic actinobacteria from roots, stems, leave and seeds of the oleaginous plant Jatropha curcas L.[66]. In another study of the diversity of endophytic actinobacteria found in the medicinal plant Maytenus austroyunnanensis from a tropical forest in Xishuangbanna, China, 312 isolates were obtained, which were added to the Actinomycetales order (distributed in 21 genera) [63]. Conn and Franco confirmed the presence of endophytic actinobacteria diversity in wheat roots, with the presence of various species of Mycobacterium and Streptomyces genera [50]. Cotin et al. investigated the community of endophytic actinobacteria associated to the Brazilian medicinal plant Lychnophora ericoides and used phylogenetic analysis to identify a predominance of the Streptomyces genus [67]. The same observation was made for the collection of endophytic actinobacteria in Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest, after phylogenetic analysis. Studies consider endophytic actinobacteria as indirect promoters of plant growth, increased availability of nutrients and inducers of systemic resistance [48,68,66]. The bioactive metabolites produced by endophytic actinobacteria can be promising sources to fight various phytopathogens, human pathogens resistant to medication, and for bioremediation of the environment [63,69,68,70-72]. Conclusions This study was a rare investigation involving endophytic actinobacteria in the phytophysiognomies of Brazilian Rocky Field and Dry Tropical Forest, belonging to the Brazilian territory. It became evident that the endophytic microbial populations in the two phytophysiognomy are diverse and expressive and may be associated to the water stress to which the host plants were submitted in these habitats. Actinobacteria, in particular the Streptomyces genus, are versatile and can colonize different plants and different plant parts in the phytophysiognomies under study. The diversity of the endophytic actinobacteria of the collection is associated to a variability in the composition of the media used for isolation. 26 REFERENCES 1. Cardoso MCdS, Carvalho CJBd (2007) Áreas de Endemismo de Gaylussacia H.B.K., 1818 (Ericaceae, Ericales). Arquivos do Museu Nacional 65 (2):9 2. Silva JMC, Bates JM (2002) Biogeographic Patterns and Conservation in the South American Cerrado: A Tropical Savanna Hotspot: The Cerrado, which includes both forest and savanna habitats, is the second largest South American biome, and among the most threatened on the continent. BioScience 52 (3):225-234. doi:10.1641/0006- 3568(2002)052[0225:bpacit]2.0.co;2 3. Flores AS, Tozzi AMGA (2008) Phytogeographical patterns of crotalaria species (Leguminosae-papilionoideae) In Brazil. Rodriguésia 59 (3):10 4. Gonçalves PR, Myers P, Vilela JF, Oliveira JA (2007) Systematics of species of the genus Akodon (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) in southeastern Brazil and implications for the biogeography of the campos de altitude. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 197:24 5. Ratter JA, Askew GP, Montgomery RF, Gifford DR (1978) Observations on the vegetation of northeastern Mato Grosso II. Forests and soils of the Rio Suia--Missu area. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences 203 (1151):191-208 6. Bary A (1866) Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Flechten und Myxomyceten. Hofmeister’s handbook of physiological Botany. W. Engelmann, Leipzig 7. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttila AM, Compant S, Campisano A, Doring M, Sessitsch A (2015) The Hidden World within Plants: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations for Defining Functioning of Microbial Endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79 (3):293-320. doi:10.1128/MMBR.00050-14 8. Kogel KH, Franken P, Huckelhoven R (2006) Endophyte or parasite--what decides? Curr Opin Plant Biol 9 (4):358-363. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.001 9. Kusari S, Hertweck C, Spiteller M (2012) Chemical ecology of endophytic fungi: origins of secondary metabolites. Chem Biol 19 (7):792-798. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.004 10. Saikkonen K, Gundel PE, Helander M (2013) Chemical ecology mediated by fungal endophytes in grasses. J Chem Ecol 39 (7):962-968. doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0310-3 11. Schulz B, Boyle C (2005) The endophytic continuum. Mycol Res 109 (Pt 6):661-686 12. Wilson D (1995) Endophyte: The Evolution of a Term, and Clarification of Its Use and Definition. Oikos 73 (2):274-276. doi:10.2307/3545919 13. Rosenblueth M, Martinez-Romero E (2006) Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19 (8):827-837. doi:10.1094/MPMI-19-0827 14. Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN (2008) Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS microbiology letters 278 (1):1-9. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x 15. stone, bacon, White J (2000) An overview of endophytic microbes: Endophytism defined, vol 1. 16. Bascom-Slack CA, Ma C, Moore E, Babbs B, Fenn K, Greene JS, Hann BD, Keehner J, Kelley-Swift EG, Kembaiyan V, Lee SJ, Li P, Light DY, Lin EH, Schorn MA, Vekhter D, Boulanger LA, Hess WM, Vargas PN, Strobel GA, Strobel SA (2009) Multiple, novel biologically active endophytic actinomycetes isolated from upper Amazonian rainforests. Microbial ecology 58 (2):374-383. doi:10.1007/s00248-009-9494-z 17. Zhao K, Penttinen P, Guan T, Xiao J, Chen Q, Xu J, Lindstrom K, Zhang L, Zhang X, Strobel GA (2011) The diversity and anti-microbial activity of endophytic actinomycetes isolated from medicinal plants in Panxi plateau, China. Curr Microbiol 62 (1):182-190. doi:10.1007/s00284-010-9685-3 27 18. Kampapongsa D, Kaewkla O (2016) Biodiversity of endophytic actinobacteria from jasmine rice (Oryza sativa L. KDML 105) grown in Roi-Et Province, Thailand and their antimicrobial activity against rice pathogens. Annals of Microbiology 66 (2):587-595. doi:10.1007/s13213-015-1140-z 19. Sun W, Dai S, Jiang S, Wang G, Liu G, Wu H, Li X (2010) Culture-dependent and culture-independent diversity of Actinobacteria associated with the marine sponge Hymeniacidon perleve from the South China Sea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 98 (1):65- 75. doi:10.1007/s10482-010-9430-8 20. Wu J, Guan T, Jiang H, Zhi X, Tang S, Dong H, Zhang L, Li W (2009) Diversity of Actinobacterial community in saline sediments from Yunnan and Xinjiang, China. Extremophiles 13 (4):623-632. doi:10.1007/s00792-009-0245-3 21. Berdy J (2005) Bioactive microbial metabolites. The Journal of antibiotics 58 (1):1-26. doi:10.1038/ja.2005.1 22. Chin YW, Balunas MJ, Chai HB, Kinghorn AD (2006) Drug discovery from natural sources. AAPS J 8 (2):E239-253. doi:10.1208/aapsj080228 23. Qin S, Li J, Chen HH, Zhao GZ, Zhu WY, Jiang CL, Xu LH, Li WJ (2009) Isolation, diversity, and antimicrobial activity of rare actinobacteria from medicinal plants of tropical rain forests in Xishuangbanna, China. Applied and environmental microbiology 75 (19):6176-6186. doi:10.1128/AEM.01034-09 24. Qin S, Xing K, Jiang JH, Xu LH, Li WJ (2011) Biodiversity, bioactive natural products and biotechnological potential of plant-associated endophytic actinobacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89 (3):457-473. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2923-6 25. Hasegawa S, Meguro A, Shimizu M, Nishimura T, Kunoh H (2006) Endophytic Actinomycetes and Their Interactions with Host Plants. Actinomycetologica 20 (2):72- 81. doi:10.3209/saj.20.72 26. Strobel G, Daisy B, Castillo U, Harper J (2004) Natural products from endophytic microorganisms. J Nat Prod 67 (2):257-268. doi:10.1021/np030397v 27. Wilkinson KG, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (1989) Interaction of soil bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi and orchid seed in relation to germination of Australian orchids. New Phytologist 112 (3):429-435. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1989.tb00334.x 28. Araujo WL, Marcon J, Maccheroni W, Jr., Van Elsas JD, Van Vuurde JW, Azevedo JL (2002) Diversity of endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with Xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants. Applied and environmental microbiology 68 (10):4906-4914 29. Galdiano Júnior RF (2009) Isolamento, Identificação e Inoculação de Bactérias Produtoras de Auxinas Associadas às Raízes de Orquídeas. Dissertação, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal – São Paulo 30. Taniguchi JG, Kawaguti HY, Silva WFd, Simon JW, Delgado CHO, Fleuri LF (2014) Produção de moléculas bioativas por fermentação em estado sólido utilizando novos actinomicetos e caracterização parcial dos principais compostos. Trends in Bioscience and Biotechnology 1 (1):4 31. Mendonça JN (2011) Identificação e Isolamento de Corantes Naturais produzidos por Actinobactérias. Dissertação, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Petro - São Paulo 32. Gonzalez I, Ayuso-Sacido A, Anderson A, Genilloud O (2005) Actinomycetes isolated from lichens: evaluation of their diversity and detection of biosynthetic gene sequences. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 54 (3):401-415. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2005.05.004 33. Döbereiner J, Reis VM, Paula MA, Olivares F (1993) Endophytic Diazotrophs in Sugar Cane, Cereals and Tuber Plants. In: Palacios R, Mora J, Newton WE (eds) New Horizons in Nitrogen Fixation: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Nitrogen Fixation, Cancún, Mexico, December 6–12, 1992. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 671-676. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2416-6_55 28 34. Guimarães LC, Fernandes AP, Chalfoun SM, Batista LR (2014) Methods to preserve potentially toxigenic fungi. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 45 (1):43-47 35. Whitman W, Goodfellow M, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Trujillo M, Ludwig W, Suzuki K-i, Parte A (eds) (2012) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology - Volume 5: The Actinobacteria. 2 edn. Springer-Verlag, New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-68233-4 36. Koneman EW, Allen S (2008) Diagnostico Microbiologico/Microbiological diagnosis: Texto Y Atlas En Color/Text and Color Atlas. Médica Panamericana, 37. Assis GBN, Pereira FL, Zegarra AU, Tavares GC, Leal CA, Figueiredo HCP (2017) Use of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for the Fast Identification of Gram-Positive Fish Pathogens. Front Microbiol 8:1492. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01492 38. Fox JG, Yan LL, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Shames B, Murphy JC, Hayward A, Belcher JC, Mendes EN (1995) Helicobacter bilis sp. nov., a novel Helicobacter species isolated from bile, livers, and intestines of aged, inbred mice. J Clin Microbiol 33 (2):445-454 39. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W (2000) A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7 (1-2):203-214. doi:10.1089/10665270050081478 40. Rzhetsky A, Nei M (1992) A Simple Method for Estimating and Testing Minimum- Evolution Trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 9 (5):945-945. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040771 41. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution 39 (4):783-791. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x 42. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16 (2):111-120 43. Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. 44. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4 (4):406-425. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 45. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35 (6):1547- 1549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096 46. Nalini MS, Prakash HS (2017) Diversity and bioprospecting of actinomycete endophytes from the medicinal plants. Letters in applied microbiology 64 (4):261-270. doi:10.1111/lam.12718 47. Ganapathy A, Natesan S (2018) Chapter 14 - Metabolic Potential and Biotechnological Importance of Plant Associated Endophytic Actinobacteria. In: Singh BP, Gupta VK, Passari AK (eds) New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier, pp 207-224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63994- 3.00014-X 48. Zhang X, Gao Z, Zhang M, Jing F, Du J, Zhang L (2016) Analysis of endophytic actinobacteria species diversity in the stem of Gynura cusimbua by 16S rRNA gene clone library. Microbiology 85 (3):379-385. doi:10.1134/s0026261716030176 49. Cao L, Qiu Z, You J, Tan H, Zhou S (2004) Isolation and characterization of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots. Letters in applied microbiology 39 (5):425-430. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2004.01606.x 50. Conn VM, Franco CM (2004) Analysis of the endophytic actinobacterial population in the roots of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing of 16S rRNA clones. Applied and environmental microbiology 70 (3):1787-1794 51. Igarashi Y, Miura SS, Fujita T, Furumai T (2006) Pterocidin, a cytotoxic compound from the endophytic Streptomyces hygroscopicus. The Journal of antibiotics 59 (3):193-195. doi:10.1038/ja.2006.28 29 52. Goudjal Y, Zamoum M, Sabaou N, Zitouni A (2018) Chapter 7 - Endophytic Actinobacteria from Native Plants of Algerian Sahara: Potential Agents for Biocontrol and Promotion of Plant Growth. In: Singh BP, Gupta VK, Passari AK (eds) New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier, pp 109- 124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63994-3.00007-2 53. Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE (2013) Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot 100 (9):1738-1750. doi:10.3732/ajb.1200572 54. Golinska P, Wypij M, Agarkar G, Rathod D, Dahm H, Rai M (2015) Endophytic actinobacteria of medicinal plants: diversity and bioactivity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 108 (2):267-289. doi:10.1007/s10482-015-0502-7 55. J H (2001) Plant interactions with endophytic bacteria. In: MJ J, NJ S (eds) Biotic interactions in plantpathogen association. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 87–119 56. Gangwar M, Dogra S, Gupta UP, Kharwar RN (2014) Diversity and biopotential of endophytic actinomycetes from three medicinal plants in India. African Journal of Microbiology Research 8 (2):8 57. Passari AK, Mishra VK, Gupta VK, Singh BP (2018) Chapter 1 - Methods Used for the Recovery of Culturable Endophytic Actinobacteria: An Overview. In: Singh BP, Gupta VK, Passari AK (eds) New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier, pp 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63994- 3.00001-1 58. Kim TU, Cho SH, Han JH, Shin YM, Lee HB, Kim SB (2012) Diversity and physiological properties of root endophytic actinobacteria in native herbaceous plants of Korea. J Microbiol 50 (1):50-57. doi:10.1007/s12275-012-1417-x 59. Mohamed H, Miloud B, Zohra F, Garcia-Arenzana JM, Veloso A, Rodriguez-Couto S (2017) Isolation and Characterization of Actinobacteria from Algerian Sahara Soils with Antimicrobial Activities. Int J Mol Cell Med 6 (2):109-120. doi:10.22088/acadpub.BUMS.6.2.5 60. Arango C, Acosta-Gonzalez A, Parra-Giraldo CM, Sanchez-Quitian ZA, Kerr R, Diaz LE (2018) Characterization of Actinobacterial Communities from Arauca River Sediments (Colombia) Reveals Antimicrobial Potential Presented in Low Abundant Isolates. Open Microbiol J 12:181-194. doi:10.2174/1874285801812010181 61. Huang TS, Lee CC, Tu HZ, Lee SS (2018) Rapid identification of mycobacteria from positive MGIT broths of primary cultures by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. PLoS One 13 (2):e0192291. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192291 62. Loucif L, Bendjama E, Gacemi-Kirane D, Rolain J-M (2014) Rapid identification of Streptomyces isolates by MALDI-TOF MS. Microbiological Research 169 (12):940-947. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2014.04.004 63. Qin S, Chen HH, Zhao GZ, Li J, Zhu WY, Xu LH, Jiang JH, Li WJ (2012) Abundant and diverse endophytic actinobacteria associated with medicinal plant Maytenus austroyunnanensis in Xishuangbanna tropical rainforest revealed by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Environ Microbiol Rep 4 (5):522-531. doi:10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00357.x 64. Salam N, Khieu T-N, Liu M-J, Vu T-T, Chu-Ky S, Quach N-T, Phi Q-T, Narsing Rao MP, Fontana A, #xe9, lique, Sarter S, Li W-J (2017) Endophytic Actinobacteria Associated with Dracaena cochinchinensis Lour.: Isolation, Diversity, and Their Cytotoxic Activities. BioMed Research International 2017:11. doi:10.1155/2017/1308563 30 65. Lee SO, Choi GJ, Choi YH, Jang KS, Park DJ, Kim CJ, Kim JC (2008) Isolation and characterization of endophytic actinomycetes from Chinese cabbage roots as antagonists to Plasmodiophora brassicae. J Microbiol Biotechnol 18 (11):1741-1746 66. Qin S, Miao Q, Feng W-W, Wang Y, Zhu X, Xing K, Jiang J-H (2015) Biodiversity and plant growth promoting traits of culturable endophytic actinobacteria associated with Jatropha curcas L. growing in Panxi dry-hot valley soil. Applied Soil Ecology 93:47-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.04.004 67. Conti R, Chagas FO, Caraballo-Rodriguez AM, Melo WG, do Nascimento AM, Cavalcanti BC, de Moraes MO, Pessoa C, Costa-Lotufo LV, Krogh R, Andricopulo AD, Lopes NP, Pupo MT (2016) Endophytic Actinobacteria from the Brazilian Medicinal Plant Lychnophora ericoides Mart. and the Biological Potential of Their Secondary Metabolites. Chem Biodivers 13 (6):727-736. doi:10.1002/cbdv.201500225 68. de Oliveira MF, da Silva MG, Van Der Sand ST (2010) Anti-phytopathogen potential of endophytic actinobacteria isolated from tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in southern Brazil, and characterization of Streptomyces sp. R18(6), a potential biocontrol agent. Research in microbiology 161 (7):565-572. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2010.05.008 69. Gohain A, Gogoi A, Debnath R, Yadav A, Singh BP, Gupta VK, Sharma R, Saikia R (2015) Antimicrobial biosynthetic potential and genetic diversity of endophytic actinomycetes associated with medicinal plants. FEMS microbiology letters 362 (19). doi:10.1093/femsle/fnv158 70. Misk A, Franco C (2011) Biocontrol of chickpea root rot using endophytic actinobacteria. BioControl 56 (5):811-822. doi:10.1007/s10526-011-9352-z 71. Alvarez A, Saez JM, Davila Costa JS, Colin VL, Fuentes MS, Cuozzo SA, Benimeli CS, Polti MA, Amoroso MJ (2017) Actinobacteria: Current research and perspectives for bioremediation of pesticides and heavy metals. Chemosphere 166:41-62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.070 72. Baoune H, Ould El Hadj-Khelil A, Pucci G, Sineli P, Loucif L, Polti MA (2018) Petroleum degradation by endophytic Streptomyces spp. isolated from plants grown in contaminated soil of southern Algeria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 147:602- 609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.013 31 3.2 PRODUTO 2 Page | 32 Antibiotic Potential of Metabolic Products of Endophytic Actinobacteria from Brazilian Rocky Field in Minas Gerais - Brazil Lucas Oliveira Barros1, Ronize Viviane Jorge Faria1, Jotta Junior Novaes1, Ana Cristina de Carvalho Botelho1, Sérgio Avelino Mota Nobre1,* 1 State University of Montes Claros *corresponding author e-mail address: sergio.nobre01@gmail.com ABSTRACT The emerging resistance of pathogens to the available therapies underscores the need to discover new antimicrobials and endophytic actinobacteria attract significant interest in their ability to produce a large number of secondary metabolites exhibiting a variety of biological activities. We aimed to obtain fractions of the metabolic product of resident endophytic actinobacteria from the Brazilian Rocky Field with antimicrobial potential. The metabolic product of rockhopper endophytic actinobacteria was obtained by culture in two media in broth and separated from the cell mass by centrifugation and filtration. The fractionation of the metabolic products was performed with non-water miscible solvents and the antimicrobial activity test was evaluated by microdilution. The 16 non-fractionated metabolic products and the 48 fractions were subjected to the inhibition test, of which only one fractionated metabolic product presented antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus in a low concentration. The actinobacterium Micromonospora aurantiaca, isolated from within the root of a plant, produced a metabolic product with antimicrobial activity. Keywords: Actinobacteria, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Gram-Positive Bacteria 1. INTRODUCTION The phylum Actinobacteria comprises a wide variety of Gram-positive bacteria with high content of guanine and cytosine (G + C) in DNA [1]. Actinobacteria are found in natural habitats, such as soils, freshwater basins, marine habitats, atmosphere and plant tissues [1-3], and are notable for their ability to produce various natural products, including antimicrobials, antitumor agents, enzymes and immunosuppressive agents [4-7]. In recent years, endophytic actinobacteria have attracted a significant interest in their ability to produce a large number of secondary metabolites that exhibit a variety of biological activities, such as antimicrobials, antitumor agents, plant growth promoters and enzymes, and can contribute to plants hosts promoting growth and health [7-9]. Deaths attributable to antimicrobial resistant infections are expected to rise to more than 10 million by 2050, this emerging resistance of microbial pathogens to the available therapies, and the current increase in the number of new diseases underscores the need to discover new antimicrobials to combat infectious diseases [10]. We aimed to obtain fractions of the metabolic product of resident endophytic actinobacteria from the Brazilian Rocky Field with antimicrobial potential. 2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Figure 1. Sequence of the activities of the experiments. Collection of microorganisms Endophytic actinobacteria were obtained from the Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biocontrol of Microorganisms (LEBM) of the State University of Montes Claros (UNIMONTES). Obtaining metabolic product Endophytic actinobacteria were cultured on plates containing Czapek Dox agar (CZP) [11] at 28 ± 1°C for 15 days. After the incubation time 3 ml of sterile water was added to the plates to suspend the mycelium with the spores. Transfer the suspension to erlenmeyers containing Amido Nitrate Casein (SCN) [12] and Czapek Dox (CZP) broth in 1:20 ratio, remained under agitation for 12 hours at 150 rpm and 12 hours of rest for 15 days at 28°C [13]. The metabolic fluid was separated from the cell mass by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 15 minutes. The complete separation of the two phases was done by filter membrane (0,22 m) [14]. Fractional collection of metabolic product The extraction of the active principle from the metabolic residue was carried out with non-water miscible solvents (ethyl acetate, chloroform and ethyl ether). Used the ratio of 2: 1 solvent / Volume _, Issue ..., 201_, ...-... ISSN 2069-5837 Open Access Journal Received: / Revised: / Accepted: / Published on-line: Original Research Article Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry www.BiointerfaceResearch.com Antibiotic Potential of Metabolic Products of Endophytic Actinobacteria of the Bazilian Rocky Field in Minas Gerais - Brazil Page | 33 metabolic product with shaking at 150 rpm for 20 minutes. After the elapsed time, the two phases were separated by centrifugation and the solvent part was removed for drying and obtaining the dry active principle. The dry active principle was suspended only with sterile water for inhibition tests [13]. Antimicrobial activity of metabolic products The antimicrobial activity of the non-fractionated and fractionated metabolic residue of the endophytic actinobacteria was evaluated in 96-well microdilution plates against Escherichia coli ATCC 8739; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25105; Candida albicans ATCC 10231. The inoculum of the test bacteria was adjusted in 0.85% saline to 0.5 McFarland 0,5 (1,5 x 108 UFC/mL), diluted 1:10 to obtain a concentration of 107 UFC/mL. When 5 L of this suspension was transferred into 95 L of Mueller Hinton broth a final concentration of 5 x 105 UFC/mL. Each well of the microdilution plate was inoculated a volume of 10 μL of inoculum into 90 μL of metabolic residue [15]. The yeast inoculum was adjusted in 0.85% saline to 0.5 McFarland (1 x 106 cells/mL), diluted 1: 100 also in saline, followed by a 1:20 dilution in RPMI 1640 liquid medium, resulting in in a final concentration of 5 x 102 to 2.5 x 103 cells/mL, this being the test concentration. Each well of the microdilution plate was inoculated in a ratio of 1:1 (100 μL of inoculum in 100 μL of metabolic residue [15]. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration by microdilution The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination was performed by microdilution in 96-well plates, the inoculum of the microorganisms tested was done as previously described and the test followed the standard determined by the manual Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2010) [15]. The metabolic residue concentrations used in the test were: 100%; 50%; 25%; 12.5%; 6.25% and 3.125% from the origin. The microplates were cultured at 37 ° C for 18-24 hours. After the incubation time, the 96-well plates were developed with 20 μL of resazurin (0.02%) and incubated for 2 hours to observe the occurrence at the change in staining, the blue color indicated inhibition of microbial growth and pink color indicated microbial growth. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of fractionated
Compartilhar