Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Module 4 Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Direct Stiffness Method Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Lesson 26 The Direct Stiffness Method: Temperature Changes and Fabrication Errors in Truss Analysis Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Instructional Objectives After reading this chapter the student will be able to 1. Compute stresses developed in the truss members due to temperature changes. 2. Compute stresses developed in truss members due to fabrication members. 3. Compute reactions in plane truss due to temperature changes and fabrication errors. 26.1 Introduction In the last four lessons, the direct stiffness method as applied to the truss analysis was discussed. Assembly of member stiffness matrices, imposition of boundary conditions, and the problem of inclined supports were discussed. Due to the change in temperature the truss members either expand or shrink. However, in the case of statically indeterminate trusses, the length of the members is prevented from either expansion or contraction. Thus, the stresses are developed in the members due to changes in temperature. Similarly the error in fabricating truss members also produces additional stresses in the trusses. Both these effects can be easily accounted for in the stiffness analysis. 26.2 Temperature Effects and Fabrication Errors Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Consider truss member of length L, area of cross section A as shown in Fig.26.1.The change in length lΔ is given by TLl Δ=Δ α (26.1) where α is the coefficient of thermal expansion of the material considered. If the member is not allowed to change its length (as in the case of statically indeterminate truss) the change in temperature will induce additional forces in the member. As the truss element is a one dimensional element in the local coordinate system, the thermal load can be easily calculated in global co- ordinate system by 1( )tp AE L′ = Δ (26.2a) 2( )tp AE L′ = − Δ (26.2b) or ( ){ } ⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧ − +Δ= 1 1' LAEp t (26.3) The equation (26.3) can also be used to calculate forces developed in the truss member in the local coordinate system due to fabrication error. LΔ will be considered positive if the member is too long. The forces in the local coordinate system can be transformed to global coordinate system by using the equation, ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ⎪⎭ ⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎩ ⎪⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ = ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ t t t t t t p p p p p p ' 2 ' 1 4 3 2 1 sin0 cos0 0sin 0cos θ θ θ θ (26.4a) where ( ) ( )tt pp 21 , and ( ) ( )tt pp 43 , are the forces in the global coordinate system at nodes 1 and 2 of the truss member respectively Using equation (26.3), the equation (26.4a) may be written as, 1 2 3 4 ( ) cos ( ) sin ( ) cos ( ) sin t t t t p p AE L p p θ θ θ θ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= Δ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭ (26.4b) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur The force displacement equation for the entire truss may be written as, { } [ ]{ } { }tpukp )(+= (26.5) where ,{ }p is the vector of external joint loads applied on the truss and ( ){ }tp is the vector of joint loads developed in the truss due to change in temperature/fabrication error of one or more members. As pointed out earlier. in the truss analysis, some joint displacements are known due to boundary conditions and some joint loads are known as they are applied externally.Thus,one could partition the above equation as, [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] { } { } ( ) ( ) ⎪⎭ ⎪⎬⎫⎪⎩ ⎪⎨⎧+⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡= ⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧ tu tk k u u k p p u u kk kk p p 2221 1211 (26.6) where subscript u is used to denote unknown quantities and subscript k is used to denote known quantities of forces and displacements. Expanding equation (26.6), { } [ ]{ } [ ]{ } ( ){ }tkkuk pukukp ++= 1211 (26.7a) { } [ ]{ } [ ]{ } ( ){ }21 22u u k u tp k u k u p= + + (26.7b) If the known displacement vector { } { }0=ku then using equation (26.2a) the unknown displacements can be calculated as { } [ ] { } ( ){ }( )tkku ppku −= −111 (26.8a) If { } 0≠ku then { } [ ] { } [ ]{ } ( ){ }( )tkkkuu pukpku −−= − 121 (26.8b) After evaluating unknown displacements, the unknown force vectors are calculated using equation (26.7b).After evaluating displacements, the member forces in the local coordinate system for each member are evaluated by, { } [ ][ ]{ } { }tpuTkp ′+′=′ (26.9a) or ( )( ) ⎪⎭ ⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎩ ⎪⎨ ⎧+ ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡ − −=⎪⎭ ⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎩ ⎪⎨ ⎧ t t p p v u v u L AE p p ' 2 ' 1 2 2 1 1 ' 2 ' 1 sincos00 00sincos 11 11 θθ θθ Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Expanding the above equation, yields { } { } LAE v u v u L AEp Δ+ ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ −−=′ 2 2 1 1 1 sincossincos θθθθ (26.10a) And, { } { } 1 1 2 2 2 cos sin cos sin u vAEp AE L uL v θ θ θ θ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪′ = − − − Δ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ (26.10b) Few problems are solved to illustrate the application of the above procedure to calculate thermal effects /fabrication errors in the truss analysis:- Example 26.1 Analyze the truss shown in Fig.26.2a, if the temperature of the member (2) is raised by Co40 .The sectional areas of members in square centimeters are shown in the figure. Assume 25 /102 mmNE ×= and 1/ 75,000α = per Co . Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur The numbering of joints and members are shown in Fig.26.2b. The possible global displacement degrees of freedom are also shown in the figure. Note that lower numbers are used to indicate unconstrained degrees of freedom. From the figure it is obvious that the displacements 0876543 ====== uuuuuu due to boundary conditions. The temperature of the member (2) has been raised by Co40 . Thus, TLL Δ=Δ α ( )( ) 3102627.24023 75000 1 −×==ΔL m (1) The forces in member (2) due to rise in temperature in global coordinate system can be calculated using equation (26.4b).Thus, ( ) ( ) ( ) ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − −Δ= ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ θ θ θ θ sin cos sin cos)( 2 1 6 5 LAE p p p p t t t t (2) For member (2), 242 102020 mcmA −×== and o45=θ Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 5 6 4 11 3 3 1 2 1 2 1 220 10 2 10 2.2627 10 /10 1 2 1 2 t t t t p p p p − − ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= × × × × ×⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ (3) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 5 6 1 2 1 1 150.82 1 1 t t t t p p kN p p ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪=⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭ (4) In the next step, write stiffness matrix of each member in global coordinate system and assemblethem to obtain global stiffness matrix Element (1): 240 1015,3,0 mAmL −×===θ ,nodal points 4-1 4 11 ' 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 015 10 2 10 1 0 1 03 10 0 0 0 0 k − −⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥× × × ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ =⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥−× ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ (5) Member (2): 241020,23,45 mAmL −×=== oθ , nodal points 3-1 [ ] ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ −− −− −− −− ×××= − 5.05.05.05.0 5.05.05.05.0 5.05.05.05.0 5.05.05.05.0 23 1021020 1142k (6) Member (3): ,30,1015,90 24 mLmA =×== −oθ nodal points 2-1 Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur 4 11 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 115 10 2 10 0 0 0 03 x 10 10 0 1 0 1 k − ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥−× × × ⎢ ⎥⎡ ⎤ =⎣ ⎦ ⎢ ⎥× ⎢ ⎥−⎣ ⎦ (7) The global stiffness matrix is of the order 88× ,assembling the three member stiffness matrices, one gets [ ] ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −− −− − −−− −−− = 00000000 010000000100 0014.4714.470014.4714.47 0014.4714.470014.4714.47 000010001000 00000000 0014.4714.47100014.14714.47 010014.4714.470014.4714.147 103k (8) Writing the load displacement equation for the truss ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p p p p p p p p = ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −− −− − −−− −−− 00000000 010000000100 0014.4714.470014.4714.47 0014.4714.470014.4714.47 000010001000 00000000 0014.4714.47100014.14714.47 010014.4714.470014.4714.147 103 ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 u u u u u u u u + ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 640 (9) In the present case, the displacements 1u and 2u are not known. All other displacements are zero. Also 021 == pp (as no joint loads are applied).Thus, Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p p p p p p p p = ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −− −− − −−− −−− = 00000000 010000000100 0014.4714.470014.4714.47 0014.4714.470014.4714.47 000010001000 00000000 0014.4714.47100014.14714.47 010014.4714.470014.4714.147 ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 u u u u u u u u + ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 640 (10) Thus unknown displacements are 1 1 3 2 147.14 47.14 0 11 ( 150.82 ) 47.14 147.14 0 110 u u − −⎧ ⎫ ⎡ ⎤ ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫= −⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎢ ⎥ −⎣ ⎦ ⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭ (11) 4 1 4 2 7.763 10 7.763 10 u m u m − − = × = × Now reactions are calculated as ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ + ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ + ⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −− −− − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 1 1 0 0 640 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 01000000 0014.4714.4700 0014.4714.4700 00001000 000000 00 0100 14.4714.47 14.4714.47 1000 00 10 2 13 8 7 6 5 4 3 u u p p p p p p 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 77.63 77.63 77.63 77.63 0 p p p p p p ⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪=⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪−⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎭⎩ ⎭ kN (12) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur The support reactions are shown in Fig.26.2c.The member forces can be easily calculated from reactions. The member end forces can also be calculated by using equation (26.10a) and (26.10b). For example, for member (1), o0=θ 100103'2 ×=p [ ]0101− 4 4 0 0 7.763 10 7.763 10 − − ⎧ ⎫⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎨ ⎬×⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪×⎩ ⎭ (13) = 77.763 kN. Thus the member (1) is in tension. Member (2) o45=θ 281.94103'2 ×=p [-0.707 -0.707 0.707 0.707] ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ × × − − 3 3 102942.3 102942.3 0 0 kN. 78.1092 −=′p Thus member (2) is in compression Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Example 26.2 Analyze the truss shown in Fig.26.3a, if the member BC is made 0.01m too short before placing it in the truss. Assume AE=300 kN for all members. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Solution A similar truss with different boundary conditions has already been solved in example 25.1. For the sake of completeness the member of nodes and members are shown in Fig.26.3b.The displacements 6543 ,,, uuuu , 7u and 8u are zero due to boundary conditions. For the present problem the unconstrained degrees of freedom are 1u and 2u .The assembled stiffness matrix is of the order 88× and is available in example 25.1. In the given problem the member (2) is short by 0.01m.The forces developed in member (2) in the global coordinate system due to fabrication error is ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − − −= ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ θ θ θ θ sin cos sin cos 4 01.0 02 01 04 03 AE p p p p = ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − 75.0 0 75.0 0 kN (1) Now force-displacement relations for the truss are Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ −+ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ −− −−− −− −−− − −− −−−− −−− = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 0 75.0 0 75.0 0 162.00934.00000162.0094.0 0934.0487.0000433.0094.0054.0 00162.0094.000162.0094.0 00094.0487.00433.0094.0054.0 000025.0025.00 0433.00433.00866.000 162.0094.0162.0094.025.00575.00 094.0054.0094.0054.0000108.0 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 u u u u u u u u AE p p p p p p p p (2) Note that 0876543 ====== uuuuuu Thus, solving ⎟⎟⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜⎝ ⎛ ⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧− ⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧⎥⎦ ⎤⎢⎣ ⎡= ⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧ − 75.0 0 0 0 575.00 0108.01 1 2 1 AEu u (3) 01 =u and, mu 32 103478.4 −×−= (4) Reactions are calculated as, ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − + ⎭⎬ ⎫ ⎩⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ −− −− − − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 0 0 0 0 75.0 0 162.0094.0 094.0054.0 162.0094.0 094.0054.0 25.00 00 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 u u AE p p p p p p (5) ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 211.0 123.0 211.0 123.0 424.0 0 8 7 6 5 4 3 p p p p p p (6) The reactions and member forces are shown in Fig.26.3c. The memberforces can also be calculated by equation (26.10a) and (26.10b). For example, for member (2), o90=θ Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur 4 300' 2 =p [0 -1 0 1] L LAE u u u u Δ− ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ 2 1 4 3 ( ) ( ) 4 01.0300103478.4 4 300 3 −−×−= − kN 424.04239.0 ≅= (7) Example 26.3 Evaluate the member forces of truss shown in Fig.26.4a.The temperature of the member BC is raised by Co40 and member BD is raised by Co50 .Assume AE=300KN for all members and 75000 1=α per o C. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Solution For this problem assembled stiffness matrix is available in Fig.26.4b.The joints and members are numbered as shown in Fig.26.4b. In the given problem 4321 ,,, uuuu and 5u represent unconstrained degrees of freedom. Due to support conditions, 0876 === uuu . The temperature of the member (2) is raised by o50 C.Thus, mTLL 32 10333.3505 75000 1 −×=××=Δ=Δ α (1) The forces are developed in member (2), as it was prevented from expansion. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − −××= ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − θ θ θ θ sin cos sin cos 10333.3300 3 2 1 8 7 f f f f p p p p Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − = 1 0 1 0 (2) The displacement of the member (5) was raised by Co40 . Thus, mTLL 35 10771.34025 000,75 1 −×=××=Δ=Δ α The forces developed in member (5) as it was not allowed to expand is ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − −××= ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − 707.0 707.0 707.0 707.0 10771.3300 3 8 7 6 5 t t t t p p p p ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − −= 1 1 1 1 8.0 (3) The global force vector due to thermal load is ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 1 0 8.0 8.0 0 0 8.1 8.0 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 t t t t t t t t p p p p p p p p (4) Writing the load-displacement relation for the entire truss is given below. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − + ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ −−− −−− −−− −−− −− −−− −−− −−− = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 1 0 8.0 8.0 0 0 8.1 8.0 271.0071.000071.0071.02.00 071.0271.002.0071.0071.000 00271.0071.02.00071.0071.0 02.0071.0271.000071.0071.0 071.0071.02.00129.0071.000 071.0071.000071.0271.0020.0 2.00071.0071.000271.0071.0 00071.0071.0020.0071.0271.0 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 u u u u u u u u AE p p p p p p p p (5) In the above problem 087654321 ======== pppppppp and 0876 === uuu . Thus solving for unknown displacements, ⎟⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎟⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜⎜ ⎜⎜ ⎜⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − − ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ −− − −− − −− = ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 8.0 0 0 8.1 8.0 0 0 0 0 0 271.000071.0071.0 0129.0071.000 0071.0271.0020.0 071.000271.0071.0 071.002.0071.0271.0 1 5 4 3 2 1 AE u u u u u (5) Solving equation (5), the unknown displacements are calculated as mu umumumu 0013.0 0,0005.0,0020.0,0013.0 5 4321 −= =−=== (6) Now, reactions are computed as, ⎪⎭ ⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎩ ⎪⎨ ⎧ + ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ −− −− −−− = ⎪⎭ ⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎩ ⎪⎨ ⎧ 1 0 8.0 0071.0071.02.00 2.0071.0071.000 071.02.00071.0071.0 5 4 3 2 1 8 7 6 u u u u u p p p (7) All reactions are zero as truss is externally determinate and hence change in temperature does not induce any reaction. Now member forces are calculated by using equation (26.10b) Member (1): L=5m, o0=θ Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur 5 ' 2 AEp = [-1 0 1 0] ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ 2 1 4 3 u u u u (8) ='2p 0.1080 Kn Member 2: L=5m, o90=θ ,nodal points 4-1 5 ' 2 AEp = [0 -1 0 1] 5 2 1 8 7 10771.3300 −××− ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ u u u u (9) =0.1087 kN Member (3): L=5m, o0=θ ,nodal points 3-4 5 300' 2 =p [-1 0 1 0] ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ 8 7 6 5 u u u u (10) =0.0780kN Member (4): ,5,90 mL == oθ nodal points 3-2 5 300' 2 =p [0 -1 0 1] ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ 4 3 6 5 u u u u =0 (11) Member (5): 25,45 == Loθ ,nodal points 3-1 25 300' 2 =p [-0.707 -0.707 0.707 0.707] 3 2 1 6 5 10333.3300 −××− ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ u u u u (12) =-0.8619 kN Member (6) : 25,135 == Loθ ,nodal points 4-2 Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur 25 300' 2 =p [0.707 -0.707 -0.707 0.707] ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ 4 3 8 7 u u u u = 0.0150 kN. (13) Summary In the last four lessons, the direct stiffness method as applied to the truss analysis was discussed. Assembly of member stiffness matrices, imposition of boundary conditions, and the problem of inclined supports were discussed. Due to the change in temperature the truss members either expand or shrink. However, in the case of statically indeterminate trusses, the length of the members is prevented from either expansion or contraction. Thus, the stresses are developed in the members due to changes in temperature. Similarly the errors in fabricating truss members also produce additional stresses in the trusses. In this lesson, these effects are accounted for in the stiffness analysis. A couple of problems are solved. Analysis of StaticallyIndeterminateStructures by the DirectStiffness Method The Direct StiffnessMethod: TemperatureChanges andFabrication Errors inTruss Analysis Instructional Objectives 26.1 Introduction 26.2 Temperature Effects and Fabrication Errors Summary
Compartilhar