Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Module 4 Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Direct Stiffness Method Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Lesson 30 The Direct Stiffness Method: Plane Frames Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Instructional Objectives After reading this chapter the student will be able to 1. Derive plane frame member stiffness matrix in local co-ordinate system. 2. Transform plane frame member stiffness matrix from local to global co- ordinate system. 3. Assemble member stiffness matrices to obtain the global stiffness matrix of the plane frame. 4. Write the global load-displacement relation for the plane frame. 5. Impose boundary conditions on the load-displacement relation. 6. Analyse plane frames by the direct stiffness matrix method. 30.1 Introduction In the case of plane frame, all the members lie in the same plane and are interconnected by rigid joints. The internal stress resultants at a cross-section of a plane frame member consist of bending moment, shear force and an axial force. The significant deformations in the plane frame are only flexural and axial. In this lesson, the analysis of plane frame by direct stiffness matrix method is discussed. Initially, the stiffness matrix of the plane frame member is derived in its local co-ordinate axes and then it is transformed to global co-ordinate system. In the case of plane frames, members are oriented in different directions and hence before forming the global stiffness matrix it is necessary to refer all the member stiffness matrices to the same set of axes. This is achieved by transformation of forces and displacements to global co-ordinate system. 30.2 Member Stiffness Matrix Consider a member of a plane frame as shown in Fig. 30.1a in the member co- ordinate system ' . The global orthogonal set of axes '' zyx xyz is also shown in the figure. The frame lies in the xy plane. The member is assumed to have uniform flexural rigidity EI and uniform axial rigidity EA for sake of simplicity. The axial deformation of member will be considered in the analysis. The possible displacements at each node of the member are: translation in - and - direction and rotation about - axis. 'x 'y 'z Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Thus the frame members have six (6) degrees of freedom and are shown in Fig.30.1a. The forces acting on the member at end j and are shown in Fig. 30.1b. The relation between axial displacement and axial forces is derived in chapter 24. Similarly the relation between shear force, bending moment with translation along axis and rotation about axis are given in lesson 27. Combining them, we could write the load-displacement relation in the local co- ordinate axes for the plane frame as shown in Fig 30.1a, b as, k 'y 'z Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −−− − − − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 6 5 4 3 2 1 22 2323 22 2323 6 5 4 3 2 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' 460260 61206120 0000 260460 61206120 0000 ' ' ' ' ' ' u u u u u u L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L AE L AE L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L EI L AE L AE q q q q q q zzzz zzzz zzzz zzzz (30.1a) This may be succinctly written as { } [ ]{ }''' ukq = (30.1b) where is the member stiffness matrix. The member stiffness matrix can also be generated by giving unit displacement along each possible displacement degree of freedom one at a time and calculating resulting restraint actions. [ ]'k 30.3 Transformation from local to global co-ordinate system 30.3.1 Displacement transformation matrix In plane frame the members are oriented in different directions and hence it is necessary to transform stiffness matrix of individual members from local to global co-ordinate system before formulating the global stiffness matrix by assembly. In Fig. 30.2a the plane frame member is shown in local coordinate axes zyx ′′′ and in Fig. 30.2b, the plane frame is shown in global coordinate axes xyz . Two ends of the plane frame member are identified by j and . Let and be respectively displacements of ends k 321 ',',' uuu 654 ',',' uuu j and of the member in local coordinate system ' . Similarly and respectively are displacements of ends k '' zyx 321 ,, uuu 654 ,, uuu j and k of the member in global co-ordinate system. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Let θ be the angle by which the member is inclined to global x -axis. From Fig.30.2a and b, one could relate to as, 321 ',',' uuu 321 ,, uuu θθ sincos' 211 uuu += (30.2a) θθ cossin' 212 uuu +−= (30.2b) 33' uu = (30.2c) This may be written as, Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 100000 0000 0000 000100 0000 0000 ' ' ' ' ' ' u u u u u u lm ml lm ml u u u u u u (30.3a) Where, θcos=l and θsin=m . This may be written in compact form as, { } [ ]{ }uTu =' (30.3b) In the above equation, [ is defined as the displacement transformation matrix and it transforms the six global displacement components to six displacement components in local co-ordinate axes. Again, if the coordinate of node ]T j is and coordinate of node are ( 11, yx ) k ( )22 , yx , then, L xxl 12cos −== θ and L yym 12sin −== θ . Where ( ) ( )212212 yyxxL −+−= (30.4) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur 30.3.2 Force displacement matrix Let and be respectively the forces in member at nodes 321 ',',' qqq 654 ',',' qqq j and as shown in Fig. 30.3a in local coordinate system. and are the forces in members at node k 321 ,, ppp 654 ,, ppp j and respectively as shown in Fig. 30.3b in the global coordinate system. Now from Fig 30.3a and b, k θθ sin'cos' 211 qqp −= (30.5a) θθ cos'sin' 212 qqp += (30.5b) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur 33 'qp = (30.5c) Thus the forces in global coordinate system can be related to forces in local coordinate system by ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' 100000 0000 0000 000100 0000 0000 q q q qq q lm ml lm ml p p p p p p (30.6a) Where, θcos=l and θsin=m . This may be compactly written as, { } [ ] { }'qTp T= (30.6b) 30.3.3 Member global stiffness matrix From equation (30.1b), we have { } [ ]{ }''' ukq = Substituting the above value of { }'q in equation (30.6b) results in, { } [ ] [ ]{ }'' ukTp T= (30.7) Making use of equation (30.3b), the above equation may be written as { } [ ] [ ][ ]{ }uTkTp T '= (30.8) or { } [ ]{ }ukp = (30.9) The equation (30.9) represents the member load-displacement relation in global coordinate system. The global member stiffness matrix [ ]k is given by, [ ] [ ] [ ][ ]TkTk T '= (30.10) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur After transformation, the assembly of member stiffness matrices is carried out in a similar procedure as discussed for truss. Finally the global load-displacement equation is written as in the case of continuous beam. Few numerical problems are solved by direct stiffness method to illustrate the procedure discussed. Example 30.1 Analyze the rigid frame shown in Fig 30.4a by direct stiffness matrix method. Assume and . The flexural rigidity 441033.1;200 mIGPaE ZZ −×== 204.0 mA = EI and axial rigidity EA are the same for both the beams. Solution: The plane frame is divided in to two beam elements as shown in Fig. 30.4b. The numbering of joints and members are also shown in Fig. 30.3b. Each node has three degrees of freedom. Degrees of freedom at all nodes are also shown in the figure. Also the local degrees of freedom of beam element are shown in the figure as inset. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Formulate the element stiffness matrix in local co-ordinate system and then transform it to global co-ordinate system. The origin of the global co-ordinate system is taken at node 1. Here the element stiffness matrix in global co- ordinates is only given. Member 1: °== 90;6 θmL node points 1-2; 0=l and 1=m . Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur [ ] [ ] [ ]1 'Tk T k T⎡ ⎤ =⎣ ⎦ 3 3 3 3 6 6 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 6 6 3 3 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.48 10 0 4.44 10 1.48 10 0 4.44 10 0 1.333 10 0 0 1.333 10 0 4.44 10 0 17.78 10 4.44 10 0 8.88 10 1.48 10 0 4.44 10 1.48 10 0 4.44 10 0 1.333 10 0 0 1.333 10 0 4.44 10 0 8.88 10 4.44 10 0 17. k × × × × × − × × × × ×⎡ ⎤ =⎣ ⎦ × × × × − × × × × × 3 1 2 3 4 5 678 10 ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥×⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ 3 (1) Member 2: °== 0;4 θmL ; node points 2-3 ; 1=l and 0=m . [ ] [ ] [ ][ ] 9 8 7 6 5 4 1066.26101001088.810100 1010105010101050 00100.200100.2 1088.8101001066.2610100 1010105010101050 00100.200100.2 987654 ' 3333 3333 66 3333 3333 66 2 ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ ××−×× ×−××−×− ××− ××−×× ××−×× ×−× = = TkTk T (2) The assembled global stiffness matrix [ ]K is of the order 99× . Carrying out assembly in the usual manner, we get, Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur [ ] ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −−− − −− −− −− − − −−− = 66.2610033.13100000 10501050000 002000002000000 33.1310044.441044.488.8044.4 1050103.1338003.13330 00200044.405.200144.4048.1 00088.8044.477.17044.4 00003.1333003.13330 00044.4048.144.4048.1 K (3) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur The load vector corresponding to unconstrained degrees of freedom is (vide 30.4d), { } ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − −= ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ = 6 24 12 6 5 4 p p p pk (4) In the given frame constraint degrees of freedom are . Eliminating rows and columns corresponding to constrained degrees of freedom from global stiffness matrix and writing load-displacement relationship for only unconstrained degree of freedom, 987321 ,,,,, uuuuuu Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ = ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ − − 6 5 4 3 44.441044.4 103.13380 44.405.2001 10 6 24 12 u u u (5) Solving we get, ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ × × × = ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ 3- 5- -6 6 5 4 100.13- 101.695- 106.28 u u u (6) 6 5 4 56.28 10 m., 1.695 10u u − −= × = − × Let be the support reactions along degrees of freedom respectively (vide Fig. 30.4e). Support reactions are calculated by 987321 ,,,,, RRRRRR 9,8,7,3,2,1 ⎪⎪⎭ ⎪⎪⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪⎩ ⎪⎪⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ −− − −− −− + ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 6 5 4 3 9 8 7 3 2 1 9 8 7 3 2 1 33.13100 1050 002000 88.8044.4 03.1333 44.4048.1 10 654 u u u p p p p p p R R R R R R F F F F F F ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − −+ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 92.25 40.25 57.12 85.16 59.22 42.11 92.1 40.1 57.12 14.1 59.22 57.0 24 24 0 18 0 12 9 8 7 3 2 1 R R R R R R (7) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Example 30.2 Analyse the rigid frame shown in Fig 30.5a by direct stiffness matrix method. Assume and . The flexural rigidity 5 4200 GPa ; 1.33 10 mZZE I −= = × 201.0 mA = EI and axial rigidity EA are the same for all beams. Solution: The plane frame is divided in to three beam elements as shown in Fig. 30.5b. The numbering of joints and members are also shown in Fig. 30.5b. The possible degrees of freedom at nodes are also shown in the figure. The origin of the global co- ordinate system is taken at A (node 1). Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Now formulate the element stiffness matrix in local co-ordinate system and then transform it to global co-ordinate system. In the present case three degrees of freedom are considered at each node. Member 1: °== 90;4 θmL ; node points 1-2 ; 2 1 0x xl L −= = and 2 1 1y ym L −= = . The following terms are common for all elements. 5 2 2 65 10 kN/m; 9.998 10 kNAE EI L L = × = × 2 3 3 12 44.999 10 kN/m; 2.666 10 kN.mEI EI L L = × = × Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur [ ] [ ] [ ][ ] 6 5 4 3 2 1 1066.201011033.10101 0105001050 10101050.010101050.0 1033.101011066.20101 010500105010101050.010101050.0 654321 ' 3333 55 3333 3333 55 3333 1 ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ ××××− ××− ××××− ××××− ×−× ×−×−×−× = = TkTk T (1) Member 2: °== 0;4 θmL node points 2-3; 1=l and 0=m . [ ] [ ] [ ][ ] 9 8 7 6 5 4 10666.210101033.11010 101105.00101105.00 00100.500100.5 1033.1101010666.21010 101105.00101105.00 00100.500100.5 987654 ' 3333 3333 66 3333 3333 65 2 ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ ××−×× ×−××−×− ××− ××−×× ××−×× ×−× = = TkTk T (2) Member 3: °== 270;4 θmL ; node points 3-4 ; 2 1 0x xl L −= = and 2 1 1y ym L −= = − . Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur [ ] [ ] [ ][ ] 12 11 10 9 8 7 1066.201011033.10101 0105001050 10101050.010101050.0 1033.101011066.20101 0105001050 10101050.010101050.0 121110987 ' 3333 55 3333 3333 55 3333 3 ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ ××−×× ××− ×−××−×− ××−×× ×−× ××−×× = = TkTk T (3) The assembled global stiffness matrix [ ]K is of the order 1212× . Carrying out assembly in the usual manner, we get, [ ] ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − − −−− −− −−−− −− −− −− −− − − −−− ×= 66.20133.100.1000000 0500005000000000 105.00.105.0000000 33.100.133.50.10.133.10.10000 050000.15.50000.15.00000 0.105.00.105.50000500000 00033.10.1033.50.10.133.100.1 0000.150.000.15.500005000 000005000.105.5000.1050.0 00000033.100.166.200.1 0000000500005000 0000000.1050.00.1050.0 103K (4) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur The load vector corresponding to unconstrained degrees of freedom is, { } ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ = 24 24 0 24 24 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 p p p p p p pk (5) In the given frame, constraint (known) degrees of freedom are . Eliminating rows and columns corresponding to constrained degrees of freedom from global stiffness matrix and writing load displacement relationship, 121110321 ,,,,, uuuuuu ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −−− − − − − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − − − 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 33.51133.110 15.500015.00 105.50000500 33.10.1033.50.10.1 0.15.000.15.5000 005000.105.500 10 24 24 0 24 24 10 u u u u u u (6) Solving we get, ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ × × × × × × = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 3- 5- 2- 3- 5- -2 9 8 7 6 5 4 103.85 105.65- 101.43 108.14- 103.84- 1043.1 u u u u u u (7) Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Let be the support reactions along degrees of freedom respectively. Support reactions are calculated by 121110321 ,,,,, RRRRRR 12,11,10,3,2,1 ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎥⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎢⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − −− − −− + ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 12 11 10 3 2 1 12 11 10 3 2 1 33.100.1000 05000000 0.105.0000 00033.100.1 00005000 0000.105.0 10 987654 u u u u u u p p p p p p R R R R R R F F F F F F ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ − + ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ = ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎭ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎫ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎧ 42.19 28.28 99.10 43.3 71.19 99.0 42.19 28.28 99.10 43.3 71.19 99.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11 10 3 2 1 R R R R R R (8) Summary In this lesson, the analysis of plane frame by the direct stiffness matrix method is discussed. Initially, the stiffness matrix of the plane frame member is derived in its local co-ordinate axes and then it is transformed to global co-ordinate system. In the case of plane frames, members are oriented in different directions and hence before forming the global stiffness matrix it is necessary to refer all the member stiffness matrices to the same set of axes. This is achieved by transformation of forces and displacements to global co-ordinate system. In the end, a few problems are solved to illustrate the methodology. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Direct Stiffness Method The Direct Stiffness Method: Plane Frames Instructional Objectives 30.1 Introduction 30.2 Member Stiffness Matrix 30.3 Transformation from local to global co-ordinate system 30.3.1 Displacement transformation matrix 30.3.2 Force displacement matrix 30.3.3 Member global stiffness matrix Summary
Compartilhar