Alfredo

Esta é uma pré-visualização de arquivo. Entre para ver o arquivo original

Quantitative Methodology Research: Is it on Psychologist’s Reading List?
Author: Laura Millis, Eva Abdulla & Robert A. Cribbie
York University, 2010
Elaborated by: Alfredo Conceição Erdmann
 Alison Antony Ribeiro
Methodology Research
Dr. Saraspathy Naidoo Terroso Gama de Mendonça
About
Two studies investigated the extent to which researchers are accessing quantitative methodology publications.
For psychology:
Derive
Evaluate 
Compare available procedures
The goal of research in quantitative methods for psychology is to derive, evaluate and compare available procedures for addressing the research hypotheses of psychologists. 
In other words, quantitative methodology research helps to improve the nature of the analyses being conducted by psychologists.
 Commonly these contributions are found in psychology journals that pertain to quantitative methods (e.g., Psychological Methods), and the hope is that researchers are reviewing the literature that addresses issues relevant to their research. 
However, as discussed above, it is unclear whether the research being conducted by quantitative methodologists in psychology is being utilized by researchers in psychology. 
2
About
How often do published articles in psychology journals reference quantitative methodology sources?
How often are articles that are published in quantitative methodology journals are referenced by researchers? 
Therefore, the current study seeks to answer two important questions: 
How often do published articles in psychology journals reference quantitative methodology sources? 
and 2) How often are articles that are published in quantitative methodology journals referenced by researchers? 
The first question essentially asks whether researchers conducting psychological studies are utilizing (and referencing) quantitative methodology research. 
The second question asks about the frequency with which published quantitative methodology articles are being referenced by non-quantitative researchers and by other quantitative methodology researchers. 
3
Study one
The purpose of the first study was to determine the extent to which journal articles include references to quantitative methodology literature.
Six top-tier psychology journals
Articles published in the years 2005 and 2006
Results 
39% of all articles did not include a quantitative reference of any kind
72% contained two or fewer.
The first study investigated the number of references to quantitative methodology sources in research articles from six prominent psychology journals. 
The analyses revealed that 39% of all articles reviewed did not include a quantitative reference of any kind and that 72% contained two or fewer. 
4
Study Two
Four journals that primarily publish articles that focus on quantitative methods were utilized.
Articles published in the years 1993, 1994 2003, 2004
Results 	
Indicate that quantitative methodology articles are being referenced equally by non-quantitative and quantitative methodology researchers,
But more importantly, that the number of references to quantitative methodology articles is very low
This study investigated the degree to which quantitative methodology articles are being referenced by nonquantitative researchers and by fellow quantitative methodology researchers.
Investigated the degree to which quantitative methodology articles are being referenced by non-quantitative researchers.
The second study targeted publications in quantitative methodology journals to determine the frequency with which they were being referenced in non-quantitative publications and other quantitative methodology publications. 
The second study approached the research question from a different direction than the first study
5
Conclusion
The results of these studies suggest that researchers are diligent in determining research protocol, procedures, and best practices within their own field, but that researchers are not frequently accessing the quantitative methodology literature to determine the best way to analyze their data. 
Alternatively, researchers might indeed invest time into determining recent and best statistical procedures, but do not indicate so in the reference section of their work; if this is the case then this paper should be a strong reminder to psychologists about referencing the statistical approaches they utilize. 
The results of these studies suggest that researchers are diligent in determining research protocol, procedures, and best practices within their own field, but that researchers are not frequently accessing the quantitative methodology literature to determine the best way to analyze their data. 
Alternatively, researchers might indeed invest time into determining recent and best statistical procedures, but do not indicate so in the reference section of their work; if this is the case then this paper should be a strong reminder to psychologists about referencing the statistical approaches they utilize. 
6