Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
76 CHINA FOUNDRY Vol.7 No.1 Colour Metallography of Cast Iron By Zhou Jiyang, Professor, Dalian University of Technology, China Translated by Ph.D Liu Jincheng, Fellow of Institute of Cast Metal Engineers, UK *Note: This book consists of five sections: Chapter 1 Introduction, Chapter 2 Grey Iron, Chapter 3 Spheroidal Graphite Cast Iron, Chapter 4 Vermicular Cast Iron, and Chapter 5 White Cast Iron. CHINA FOUNDRY publishes this book in several parts serially, starting from the first issue of 2009. Spheroidal Graphite Cast Iron, SG iron in short, refers to the cast iron in which graphite precipitates as spheroidal shape during solidification of liquid iron. The graphite in common commercial cast iron can only be changed from flake to spheroidal shape by spheroidising treatment. Since spheroidal graphite reduces the cutting effect of stress concentration, the metal matrix strength of SG iron can be applied around 70% – 90%, thus the mechanical property of SG iron is significantly superior to other cast irons; even the tensile strength of SG iron is higher than that carbon steel. Most engineering SG irons have eutectic or hypereutectic composition; their microstructure formed during solidification experiences similar crystallisation process to that of grey irons. However, compared to grey iron, SG iron has significantly higher undercooling, its solidification is further far away from equilibrium state, and easy to get composition deviation, divorced eutectic etc., which are different from grey iron. 3.1 Nucleation of spheroidal graphite Formation of spheroidal graphite experiences two stages: nucleation and growth; nucleation is the first process of graphite spheroid formation. In the centre of every graphite spheroid, there exists an inclusion particle or complicated combined inclusion nucleus. The shape of particles or nuclei in graphite spheroids is different from each other and the size is between 0.5 μm – 3 μm, as illustrated in Fig. 3-1[1]. Chapter 3 Spheroidal Graphite Cast Iron (I) Fig.3-1: Nucleus of spheriodal graphite [1] (a) Single inclusion (b) Complicated combined inclusions 3.1.1 Nucleation substance During melting and subsequent spheroidising and inoculation treatment, a large number of non-metallic inclusions is produced in iron melt; these primary inclusions are very small in size; in following pouring, filling and solidification processes, these inclusions collides with each other, float up or subside, aggregate and become larger, and then become nuclei of graphite precipitation. Substances for graphite nucleation include graphite, sulphides, oxides, carbides, intermetallic compounds and gasses etc, see Table 3-1[2-38]. Compared to grey iron, the nuclei in graphite spheroids are easier to find and confirm; the substances for graphite nucleation in Table 3-1 are all detected from the nuclei of graphite spheroids. It is normally considered that there is no principle difference between the flake and the spheroidal graphite February 2010 77 Serial Report silicon content in micro region, leading to local hyper-eutectic composition, ‘carbon peak’ in the micro region; the precipitated carbon is called non-equilibrium carbon. This newly formed graphite has very high activity [42], and has zero mismatch with graphite, therefore carbon atoms are easy to directly deposit on it. Beside, non- equilibrium graphite can also come from SiC. SiC is a type of silicon based nucleation agent[43, 44] and has melting point as high as 2,700 ℃, and does not directly dissolve in iron melt, only follows the equation below to dissolve in iron melt: SiC + Fe → FeSi + C (non-equilibrium graphite) In the equation, the Si in SiC combines with Fe, the released or replaced C from SiC by Fe is a type of non-equilibrium graphite and can be nuclei for graphite precipitation. (2) Substrate with salt-like structure carbides When adding into liquid iron-carbon-silicon alloy, some metals in group Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ in the periodic table of the elements can form salt-like carbides, see Table 3-2. The carbides of group Ⅱ elements in Table 3-2 can act as nuclei of graphite, since the carbides, combined by ion binding, form non-melting particles and suspend in iron melt. In addition, there exists good lattice matching between CaC2 and graphite; the distance between CaC2 crystal (111) planes is 0.341 nm, while the basal plane distance of graphite is 0.335 nm. Thus, along c-axis of graphite, the two lattices have very small mismatch. During nucleation, graphite is easy to grow heterogeneously from liquid on the carbon plane of salt-like carbides, see Fig.3-2. nuclei; an only slight difference is that there are more reaction products of spheroidising elements in the nuclei of graphite spheroids. 3.1.2 Mechanism of nucleation The inclusion in iron melt able to become graphite nucleus must not only conform to lattice match relationship between heterogeneous nucleus and graphite, but satisfy interfacial energy requirement between heterogeneous nucleus and graphite. In principle, any nucleus substance must conform to the rule of nucleus formation; nevertheless, actual nucleation mechanism is different for different nucleation substances. (1) Graphite Since the mismatch of graphite is zero (see Table 2-2), graphite is an ideal substrate for graphite crystallisation. Graphite in iron melt comes from: (a) Un-dissolved graphite: For example, if pig iron during re- melting, is superheated at lower temperature and held for a short time, the original coarse graphite flakes are left due to incomplete dissolution. It is found from experiments that with increasing of pig iron addition in charge materials, the spheroid or nodule count is increased [37]. (b) Addition of crystal graphite: If added graphite is hexagonal lattice structure, it will promote graphite nucleation, except the graphite with other crystal lattices. Addition of graphite before or at the same time with spheroidising treatment all can increase graphite spheroid or nodule count. But, addition of graphite after spheroidisation will cause deterioration of graphite shape and increase of carbides, since the added graphite changes the interface property [41]. The ash in natural graphite inhibits or retards dissolvability of graphite, destroys the interfacial energy condition of nucleation, and thus decreases nucleation effect. (c) Non-equilibrium graphite: In iron melt, the non-uniform distribution of silicon element from inoculant causes local high Table 3-1: Inclusion constituent phases in graphite nuclei Type Graphite Sulphides Oxides Compound (or element) C MgS CaS MgS•CaS MgS•Re oxysulphide MgS •(Ca,RE)S CeS;LaS Ce3S4 MnS, (Mn, Ca)S MnS•Al2S3 RE2S3 SiO2 MgO MgO•SiO2 2MgO•SiO2 3MgO•2SiO2•2H2O xMgO•ySiO2•2MgS (Mg,Ca,Al)SiO3, (Mg,Al)SiO3 (Mg,Ca,Al)SiO3 2Al2O3•FeO•10SiO2 Fe2O3 Fe2SiO4 CeO2 Al2O3 Reference [2] [3-10] [3-4, 8] [5] [8-10] [10-11] [7,12] [13] [3,10] [6,14-16] [6,17-18] [3,6,18] [6,18] [19] [20] [21] [21] [22] [17-18] [23] [17] [3,5,10] Type Carbides Nitrides Intermetallic compounds Others Reference [24] [25-27] [2] [28] [29] [30-32] [5] [2,33-34] [35-36] [35-36] [16,37-38] Compound (or element) CaC2, SrC2, BaC2 Silicon carbide, exists in short time Al4C3 MgSiN2 Mg3N2 BN AlN Ce4Bi3, CeBi3, CeBi, Ce3Bi Ce2Pb, CePb CeSb,CeSb2 La2Pb, LaPb LaBi,La4Bi3, La5Bi3 LaSb, La3Sb2, La2Sb, LaSb2 Mg, Ca bubble N2 (introduced by rare earth metal) bubble Bi Table 3-2: Type of salt-like carbides[45] Position in periodic table of theelements Carbide Group Ⅰ NaHC2 KHC2 - Group Ⅱ CaC3 SrC2 BaC2 Group Ⅲ YC2 LaC2 - 78 CHINA FOUNDRY Vol.7 No.1 (3) Oxides When contacting with air, the liquid iron is often oversaturated by oxygen. Liquid iron has higher silicon (4-6 times as higher as in steel); silicon is an excellent deoxidation element for liquid iron itself, and the deoxidation product is SiO2. Orths [46] considered that SiO2 directly controls the formation of graphite in grey iron; crystallization of graphite, to a great extent, is dependent on the amount and distribution of SiO2. The number of SiO2 particles is influenced by liquid iron temperature, oxygen content, furnace atmosphere and slag constituent phases. During melting of liquid iron, the iron-lining-slag-atmosphere actually forms a Fe-C-Si-O liquid solution system[45]. If among them C, Si and O are in equilibrium, following equation can be written: (SiO2) + 2[C] = [Si] + 2{CO} Equilibrium constant is: Below equilibrium temperature, the formed deoxidation product, solid SiO2, can play an effective role for graphite nucleation, since at this time, the SiO2 has a lattice plane able to act as a substrate. Therefore, based on the theory of oxide substrate, it is believed that under following conditions, it is possible to increase the number of graphite nuclei [45]: (a) Enough oxygen in liquid iron. (b) Enough silicon in liquid iron, which makes the content product of Si and O2, [Si][O]2 surplus, thus causing SiO2 to precipitate. (c) Cooling rate should not be too fast so as to ensure enough time for SiO2 precipitation; cooling rate should not be too slow in order to prevent nuclei aggregation, floating up and failure. (d) Add elements having high affinity with oxygen (Ca, Al, Ba, Ti, RE), supply more foreign nuclei for graphite. (e) 50 ℃ above the equilibrium reduction temperature of SiO2, otherwise SiO2 in liquid iron will be reduced. Many experiments have confirmed that there do exist oxides, and oxygen has been detected in graphite nuclei[8,47,48], but whether a single oxide, representative by SiO2, can become a substrate for graphite crystallisation is still debate. (4) Sulphide /oxide It is seen from Table 2-2 that the mismatch between sulphides MgS, MnS, CaS and graphite is relatively bigger; a single sulphide is very difficult to directly become an effective substrate for graphite precipitation. Jacobs etc.[49] measured 1 μm inclusions by EDS and proposed that graphite nuclei particles have a duplex structure consisting of a sulphide core surrounded by an oxide shell: (Ca, Mg)S sulphide in the core and (Mg, Al, Si, Ti)-oxides in the outer shell. Many elements have more stable thermodynamic potential of forming sulphide than that of forming oxide; thus they first form sulphide, which then act as substrate for oxide formation. The crystal lattice orientation relationship between these two types of compounds: Sulphide (110) // oxide (111) Sulphide (1 1 0) // oxide (211) Orientation relationship between graphite and oxide: Graphite (001) // oxide (111) Through a deep study on the duplex structure, Skaland confirmed that the constituent phase of outer shell is enstatite (MgO•SiO2) and forsterite (2MgO•SiO2), which belong to complex orthorhombic system[28]. The lattice mismatch between the complex silicates and the (0001) plane of graphite is rather large (see Table 3-3), the potential barrier for nucleation is high; thereby graphite is not easy to nucleate on them. Skaland considered that after Mg treatment, although many MgO•SiO2 and 2MgO•SiO2 substrates are produced in liquid iron, it can not expect to produce more graphite nuclei. Only after inoculation, graphite can precipitate massively. When inoculating using ferrosilicon containing Ca, Ba, Sr and Al, following reaction occurs on the surface of the inclusions: MgO • SiO2 + X = XO • SiO2 + Mg 2 (2MgO • SiO2) + X + 2A1 = XO • Al2O3 • 2SiO2 + 4Mg Where , X ― Ca, Sr or Ba. React ion products , hexagonal s i l icates XO•SiO 2 and XO•A12O3•2SiO2, form surface crystal on MgO•SiO2 and 2MgO•SiO2 substrate; among them high index plane and low- index plane have different growth velocity. The (001) plane of Fig.3-2: Heterogeneous nucleation process of carbide [24, 45] Inclusion phase Enstatite MgO•SiO2 Forsterite 2MgO•SiO2 Orientation relationship (100)n/(001)G (010)n/(001)G (001)n/(001)G (110)n/(001)G (111)n/(001)G (100)n/(001)G (010)n/(001)G (001)n/(001)G (101)n/(001)G (111)n/(001)G Lattice mismatch δ(%) 10.2 8.7 5.9 12.3 10.1 9.9 24.3 15.5 25.5 29.7 Table 3-3: Mismatch between the different lattice planes of MgO•SiO2, 2MgO•SiO2 and (001) plane of graphite[28] kSi,C = = log = + 15.47 [Si][O]2 [Si] 27486 [Si] [C]2[O]2 [C]2 T [C]2 February 2010 79 Serial Report the surface crystal and graphite form coherent or semi-coherent interface with low interface energy and have low lattice mismatch (see Table 2-2), which is beneficial for graphite nucleation. Figure 3-3 describes the duplex sulphide/oxide structure nucleus model. all lower than that of liquid iron (see Table 3-4) and their solubility in liquid iron is extremely low; during solidification, they distribute in liquid iron as extremely fine liquid particles. When temperature is slightly below eutectic temperature, plenty of new solid-liquid interfaces are formed; as substrate, graphite nucleates and grows on those interfaces [5,38]. Cooling rate has significant influences on coalescence and coarsening of the tiny liquid drops. For fast cooling thin wall castings, the tiny drops are not easy to coalesce, so the nucleation of Bi is significantly increased [36,38]. Through measurements it is found that in the Bi treated SG iron samples, there exists Bi except Mg, S, Fe and Si in the heterogeneous nuclei of Φ l μm. If addition of Bi in combination with RE, Bi and RE will form intermetallic compounds, and weaken their nucleation promotion effect of single addition. Using the new established duplex model, it is not difficult to explain: The small amount of elements Al, Ca, Sr, Ba can change the surface composition of inclusion MgO•SiO2 and 2MgO•SiO2 and play a catalyst role for graphite nuclei; the trace amount of La and Cr does not increase any new nuclei, only activates the existing inclusion nuclei [50]. Sulphide is the origin of duplex structure nuclei, thus has important effect on the number of nucleation events. Too low sulphur content, for example w(S) < 0.002%, is not beneficial for formation of a large number of nuclei[28]. The mismatch between single SiO2 and graphite lattice is quite big (37.1%), thus not suitable as substrate for nucleation. However, in the duplex structure, it is a constituent of duplex silicate and plays an important role in nucleation. The research work on substance of spheroidal graphite nuclei and related mechanism is continuing to go further and deeper. Using Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM) with composition analysis, Tartera confirmed that except for oxides, there exist sulphides of Mg, Ce and La in the outer shell of duplex structure[51]. (5) Bi and its compound: Addition of small amount of element Bi and Bi compounds can remarkably increase nodule count of SG iron. Melting point of Bi and Bi compounds are Fig. 3-3: Duplex structure model consisting of a sulphide core and oxide shell [28] (a) Old model (1976)(b) New model (1993) Table 3-4: Melting points of Bi and its compounds Substance Bi Bi2O3 Bi2S3 Bi2Mg3 Melting point (℃) 271 820 685 823 △T0 — undercooling before inoculation △T — undercooling after inoculation Fig. 3-4: Influence of inoculation on undercooling of SG iron and grey iron [52] 3.1.3 Inoculation of SG iron (1) Importance of inoculation for spheroidal graphite iron After spheroidisation, sulphur and oxygen content in the liquid iron is significantly reduced and the purity is remarkably enhanced, and the nuclei is reduced. Besides, the remaining magnesium in the liquid iron makes the undercooling increased, (see Fig.3-4). Thus, the iron after spheroidisation but without inoculation, has less graphite nuclei, strong chilling tendency and poor mechanical property; therefore after spheroidisation, the iron must be inoculated. In addition, inoculation will improve the roundness and nodularity, help graphite to become spheroidal. Inoculation is an important means to increase nodule counts and improve mechanical property of SG iron. 80 CHINA FOUNDRY Vol.7 No.1 time of inoculation for SG iron is about 12 – 15 min. Inoculation fade is aggravated with increasing holding time, enhancing treatment temperature, strong stirring, increasing white iron charge, too fine inoculant particle size and high sulphur and oxygen content in base iron melt. The fundamental reason of inoculation fade is reduction and failure of heterogeneous nuclei. Fade mechanism is related to nucleation mechanisms of various inclusions, and is a reverse process of nucleation. At present, there are following several mechanisms on inoculation fade: (a) Coarsening of inclusion particles [28]: Fine inclusion particles (1– 4 μm) in liquid iron are continuously moving in liquid iron with convection; prolonged holding will increase the opportunity of particle impingement and make the particle coarser. Particle coarsening experiences three processes: (1) impingement, (2) diffusion and (3) combination. The diameter of coarsened particle is determined by Wagner equation: Where d0 ― Diameter of original particle; σ ― Interface energy between particle-liquid; D ― Diffusivity of element; C ― Volume concentration of element; VN ― Mole volume of inclusion phase; R― Atmosphere constant; T ― Temperature; t ― Liquid holding time. It is seen that particle coarsening is proportional to holding time. Except for time factor, coarsening of particle is related to interface energy, diffusivity and the content of element. (b) Loss of concentration and temperature fluctuation:During inoculation there exists a plenty of dispersed high Si micro regions and C supersaturated atom micro cluster; in addition, there occur plenty of temperature fluctuations. Figure 3-5 shows concentration distribution of carbon and silicon from a liquid quenched sample. The non-uniformity of composition and temperature (also called concentration and temperature fluctuation) exerts active promotion for graphite nucleation. As holding time is prolonged, the concentration fluctuation phenomenon is gradually lost due to diffusion. At the same time, temperature fluctuation is gradually reduced, which, in the end, results in reduced number of graphite nuclei. (c) Re-oxidation of liquid iron [55]:Orths considered that inoculation is a de-oxidation process of liquid iron, while inoculation fade is re-oxidation of liquid iron [46]. De-oxidation reaction during inoculation produces plenty of SiO2; the increase of combined oxygen makes the dissolved oxygen content decreasing, thus leading to an increased nuclei and improved graphitisation. For the spheroidised iron, as time is prolonged, oxygen in atmosphere re-enters into the treated iron, and the dissolved oxygen increases again [55-56]. When re-oxidising, the surface of SiO2 is polluted; thus the effect as graphite nucleus gradually lost, the number of eutectic cells is significantly reduced. Table 3-5 presents the relationship of dissolved oxygen, the number of eutectic cells with liquid holding time [55]. (2) Difference and similarity in inoculation of spheroidal and grey irons SG iron and grey iron have the same nucleation substances and mechanisms, the inoculation elements used for both irons are similar. Most inoculants can be commonly used for both SG iron and grey iron. But, since the two liquid irons have different sulphur and oxygen content, different nucleation state, different composition in nuclei (SG iron contains rare earth Ce, La and Mg) and different undercooling, thus the inoculation effect is different. Since the undercooling of SG iron is far large than that of grey iron, the inoculation effect of SG iron is significantly better than that of grey iron. For example, pure silicon has very weak inoculation effect on grey iron, but shows certain inoculation effect on SG iron; ferrosilicon containing Sr significantly increases nodule counts in SG iron, but does not increase eutectic cells in grey iron. This indicates that a good inoculant for SG iron is not necessarily good for grey iron. Loper estimated that there exist about 1,000 – 10,000 active nuclei/mm2 in inoculated SG iron, among them the number of effective nuclei is much more than that in grey iron. Evaluation of inoculation effect on SG iron is to observe the nodule counts increase and the fading time. While evaluation of inoculation on grey iron is to test many items including the ability of controlling chilling tendency, increasing eutectic cells and improving section sensitivity, and mechanical property and fading resistance. Measures to increase inoculation include: (a) Select effective inoculant. Ferrosilicon based inoculant is better to contain small amount of element like Al, Ca, Ce, Sr and Ba etc. (b) Ensure the spheroidised iron has necessary sulphur. Too low sulphur content is not beneficial for improving nodule counts. It was found [53] that for a spheroidised iron containing w(S) = 0.005%, after using FeS2 post inoculation, sulphur is increased to w(S) = 0.012%, nodule shape is not affected, but nodule counts increase from 528/mm2 to 585/mm2. (c) Improve inoculation methods. Reduce the time from inoculation to solidification, since for all the inoculants, the inoculation effect all reaches the best at the moment of addition, and soon after fades; there exists no incubation period for fade. (d) Increase cooling rate. According to the new duplex structure model of graphite nucleus, (see Fig. 3-3) Skaland designed and produced a high effective inoculant, Utraseed [54], in which the difference from traditional inoculants is that except for ferrosilicon particles, a certain of non-metallic constituent S, O is added in to compensate the shortage of S and O in liquid iron after spheroidisation, which are necessary for obtaining large number of nuclei. The composition of Ultraseed is w(Si) = 70% –76%, w(Ca) = 0.75%–1.25%, w(Ce) = 0.75%–1.25%, w(Al) = 0.75% –1.25%, S and O < 1%, balance Fe. This type of inoculant has advantages of high nodule counts, good nodule shape, no carbides and shrinkage, and is successfully used in ladle transfer treatment, wire feeding and iron stream treatment. (3) Fading of inoculation As holding time is prolonged, the effect of inoculation is gradually lost; this is called fading of inoculation. The working d3 =d30 + t 64σDCV2N 9RT February 2010 81 Serial Report Table 3-5: Relationship of dissolvedoxygen, eutectic cells number with liquid holding time [55] 3.2 Growth of spheroidal graphite After nucleation, graphite immediately starts to precipitate on the substrate to grow. The final graphite shape formed is dependent on growth method influenced by processing conditions. Therefore, process control is a key to obtain spheroidal graphite. 3.2.1 Process conditions of spheroidal graphite growth For obtaining spheroidal graphite from flake one, following processing conditions must be satisfied: (1) Extreme low sulphur and oxygen content As long as sulphur content is controlled extremely low, without addition of any spheroidising element, spheroidal graphite can grow. With w(S) = 0.00001% and under fast cooling, spheroidal graphite can grow; if w(S)≥0.004%, spheroidising element must be added for spheroidal graphite growth [57]. Oxygen also is a strong subversive element for graphite to grow to spheroid. Normally volume fraction of oxygen in grey liquid iron is (35 – 60) × 10-4%; while in SG iron it is only (3 – 8) × 10-4%. When using pure iron, carbon and silicon charges and melting under vacuum condition for two hours and reducing oxygen to an extreme low level, SG iron can be obtained. (2) Addition of spheroidising element Normally sulphur and oxygen in cast iron all exceed the required level for obtaining spheroidal graphite, thus for obtaining SG iron, the addition of spheroidal element is necessary. Spheroidising elements are divided into three groups [57]: The first group: Mg, Y, Ce, Ca and La, Pr, Sm, Dy, Yb, Ho, Er The second group: Ba, Li, Cs, Rb, Sr, Tu, K, Na The third group: Al, Zn, Cd, Sn The first group has the strongest spheroidising ability; the second Holding time (min) 0→6 11 15 19 23 26 29 32 38 Temperature (℃) 1,390 1,434 1,460 1,484 1,510 1,508 1,510 1,435 1,350 Eutectic cells (cm-1/2) 317 250 149 122 105 94 72 23,537 33,889 Dissolved oxygen① (× 10-4%) 0.53 0.78 0.89 1.22 1.70 1.87 1.22 0.32 0.15 ↑ ↑ ↑ SiC spheroidisation inoculation Treatment group is the next; the third one has the weakest spheroidising ability. When using Mg as spheroidising element, the elements in the third group often have subversive effect on spheroidisation. The elements with strong spheroidisation (the first and the second group) have following common characteristics: have strong affinity with sulphur and oxygen and can strongly de-sulphur and de-oxygen; have low solubility in iron; have obvious segregation tendency during solidification; have certain affinity with carbon. Among all the spheroidising elements Mg has the strongest spheroising ability and obtains the best graphite shape, thus the SG iron produced by using pure magnesium has the best mechanical property. The optimum contents of spheroidising elements, such as Mg, Ce, Y and Ca, in SG iron depend on the cooling rate of castings. For the castings with general thickness, it should maintain in: w(Mg) = 0.035% – 0.055%;w(Ce) = 0.07% – 0.12%; w(Y) = 0.15% – 0.2%. When containing too high amount of these elements, graphite is prone to degeneration. When Mg exceeds 0.08%, except for graphite spheroids, compound MgC2∙Mg2C3 is formed and flake and spiky graphite are formed around the compounds, and at this time graphite spheroid changes towards exploded shape. Besides, since Mg is consumed, when remaining magnesium w(Mg) > 0.055%, the spheroid counts are reduced. Similar to Mg, excessive Ce and Y will produce subversive effect to graphite spheroidization [58]. (3) Restriction of subversive elements Sulphur and oxygen are commonly existing subversive element; besides, Ti, Al, B, As, Sn, Sb, Pb and Bi are occasionally existing subversive element in cast iron. According to subversive mechanism, subversive elements can be divided into three types, see Table 3-6. Fig.3-5: Non-uniformity phenomenon of carbon and silicon concentration in liquid iron [7] (inoculated at 1,400 ℃, liquid quenched after holding for 20 s) ① Volume fraction 82 CHINA FOUNDRY Vol.7 No.1 Type Consuming Segregation Mixing Element S, O, Se, Te Ti, Al, B, As, Sn, Sb Pb, Bi Subversive mechanism 1. React with Mg and consume Mg 2. Have subversive effect itself 1. Enrich in solid-liquid interface; deteriorate growth condition for graphite spheroids 2. Segregate to boundaries of austenite, decrease the melt point of austenite around graphite 1. React with Mg, Ce and Y, consume spheroidising elements 2. Segregate to boundaries of austenite, decease the melt point of austenite, destroy austenite halo. Table 3-6: Classification of subversive elements [59] Element Bi Pb Sb Sn As Te Se B Al Ti V Zr Cu Mg Ce *Reference 0.003 0.004-0.009 0.025 0.13 0.125 0.21 0.04 2 0.003 0.009 0.004 0.04 0.09 0.15 0.08 6 0.003 0.009 0.026 0.01 0.08 0.3 0.04 > 1.5 8 0.03 0.098 0.09 0.08 9 0.003-0.004 0.002-0.009 > 2.5 10 0.002 0.002 0.01 0.005 0.02 0.002 0.03 0.005 0.08 0.04 0.05 0.0l 13 0.02 0.005 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.0l 0.1 0.06 0.06 0.02 [61] 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.15 > 2.2 3 0.002 0.002 0.01-0.08 0.01-0.08 0.08 1 0.00l-0.003 0.002-0.009 0.01 0.11 0.002-0.005 0.01 0.09 0.08 5 0.002 0.002 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.5-3.5 0.02 7 Table 3-7: Critical content of some subversive elements in cast iron (mass %) Critical content Note: 1. The number of *References with no square brackets used here are the cited number of literatures in reference [60] in this chapter 2. When increasing cooling rate, the critical content allows increasing. Titanium itself does not have strong subversive effect, but can strengthen the subversive effect of As, Sb, Pb and Bi (see Fig. 3-6), since the compounds of these elements are reduced by titanium, thus increasing the effective content of subversive elements. In addition titanium increases the activity of subversive elements, thus increasing their subversive ability [59]. The combined effect of subversive elements can be expressed by the value of constant K [60]; it is seen easily that Bi and P have the strongest subversive effect. K = 4.4Ti + 1.6Al + 2.0As + 2.3Sn + 5.0Sb + 290Pb + 370Bi Under normal conditions, it should keep K ≤ 1 ± 0.1. Critical content of subversive elements in liquid iron is given in Table 3-7 [60]. Fig.3-6: Effect of Ti on the critical content of some subversive elements [60] February 2010 83 Serial Report (4) Ensure necessary cooling rate Cooling rate plays an important role for spheroidal graphite growth. In pure Fe-C, Fe-C-Si and Ni-C melt, under extremely high cooling rate, graphite spheroids can be obtained without Mg treatment. For example, for vacuum melted pure Fe-C alloy, when cooling rate reaching 20 ℃/s, some graphite can grow into spheroids; while if melting under atmosphere, the required cooling rate is 80 – 100 ℃/s. For iron melt containing sulphur, the allowed sulphur content is limited by cooling rate. For w(S) < 0.001%, the required cooling rate is 30 – 40 ℃/s; when sulphurincreases to 0.007%, the required cooling rate needs to be increased to 60 ℃/s for graphite growing to spheroids [62]. 3.2.2 Crystallisation conditions of spheroidal crystal growth Spheroid growth is a growth method of crystal in melt, and exists in many types of liquid, for example, in the industrious polymer and graphite in cast iron etc. The theory of spheroidal crystal growth is the foundation of spheroidisation of graphite. The conditions of spheroidal crystal growth are [57, 63-64]: (1) Formation of large number of symmetrical and radial small angle branches If large numbers of symmetrical and small angle branches are formed on germs or embryos in three dimensional space, which will be beneficial for formation of a polycrystal spheroid; in Fig. 3-8: A model of spheroidal crystal development from regular branching [64] (a) Single crystal vc>va (b) Flake poly-crystal vc<<va (c) Spheroidal poly-crystal vc>>va (a) Spheroid consisting of large number of regular branches; (b) Circle frame consisting of branches; (c) Feather-like branching θ― branching angle Fig. 3-7: Crystal of flake and spheroidal graphite [57] of feather-like branches make a solid spheroidal crystal. During branching, each branch, on one hand, grows along radial direction, on the other hand, and coarsens on cross direction, thus growing to angle cone. In order to grow to a spheroid not other degenerate shapes, basal plane (along c-axis) growth velocity should exceed the growth velocity of prism plane (a-axis) va: vc > va A model proposed by Double and Hellawell [66] also shows (see Fig. 3-9) that graphite spheroid consists of large number of compacted circle cones (also cal led angle cones) growing from the centre towards the outer. It can consider that each circle cone is a ‘regular branch’. Outline of typical single angle cone can be seen though observing the internal structure of spheroids under transmission microscope, see Fig.3- 10. The morphology of boundaries of angle cones is illustrated in Fig.3- 10(b). It is seen clearly that graphite spheroid is a poly-crystal structure. In addition, it also is seen that graphite branches continuously along [0001] direction. contrast, if graphite does not branch, a flake polycrystal that grows along basal direction, is formed in the end, see Fig. 3-7. In order to form large number of symmetrical and small angle branches, there must exist large number of defects in graphite crystal, because defects can form new steps and new growth direction. From crystallisation, breaking of graphite along basal plane and its sector shaped non-crystal branching are the basis of screw dislocations [65]. Small angle branching is related to the types of lattice defects. These defects are formed during activation of thermodynamics, the activation energy is increased with decrease of undercooling[64], thus strong undercooling can increase lattice defects. (2) Small angle branching should have regular branching characteristics Although the concept ‘regular branching’ was put forward quite earlier, it has never been used for description of spheroidal graphite growth. Regular branching plays an important role in formation of spheroidal crystal [64]. Each branching crystal (that is small angle branching single crystal) has almost the same growth habit and velocity, and maintains a special orientation with original crystal. The development process from regular branching to a spheroidal crystal is illustrated in Fig.3-8. First, a circle frame made of branches is formed, then large numbers of feather-like branches with the same orientation are formed; the large numbers 84 CHINA FOUNDRY Vol.7 No.1 example, no sulphur in the iron), growth curves of vst and v2D move to right, reflecting even higher undercooling (see Fig. 3-11b), vsc > v2D; graphite growth follows vsc, giving rise to spheroidal graphite growth. When spheroidising elements exist (see Fig. 3-11c), the Mg dispersed on crystal surface makes rotating twin steps to move slowly, causing growth to be inhibited or retarded, or even totally failed. At this time, only two-dimensional nucleation v2D and screw defect growth vsc remain available. vsc and v2D are all shifted to right, keeping vsc > v2D; thus graphite grows and forms a complete spheroidal shape. Crystallisation of any metal always happens in undercooled liquid; undercooling is a decisive factor influencing phase transformation driving force. It influences crystallisation from nucleation and influences growth morphology from instability of solid-liquid interface as well. It was calculated that for graphite spheroidisation, undercooling △T must be over 29 – 35 ℃. The undercooling difference between flake and SG irons is about 15 – 25 ℃ [67-68]. The undercooling during solidification of cast iron consists of two types: (a) thermal undercooling △T t and (b) constitutional undercooling △TC. 3.2.3 Defect growth of graphite spheroid and effect of undercooling A comprehensive summary has been made on the theory of spheroidal graphite formation [67]. In current theories defect growth theory more conforms to the crystallisation principle of spheroidal crystal, therefore is recognised by more scholars. However, due to the complexity of spheroidal graphite formation, some phenomena can not be explained and clarified yet; there may be other reasons for the formation of graphite spheroids. According to the theory of defect formation, the theory of non-defect nucleation and growth, and the effect of inclusions on graphite growth, the kinetic curves of growth velocity on different lattice planes can be described. Morphologies of graphite are dependent on the growth velocity of (0001) and (1010) planes and affected by the undercooling (△T ) at interfaces decisively[68-69]. The relationship between undercooling (△T) and growth velocity v under different circumstances is shown in Fig.3-11. When the melt is polluted by sulphur (see Fig. 3-11a), the growth velocity related situations are changed; under small undercooling, rotating twin step growth velocity vst is faster than two-dimensional nucleation growth velocity v2D, or faster than screw dislocation growth velocity, graphite grows to flake. Under very pure conditions (for (a) Grown spheroid, (b) Single cone crystal, (c) Relation between apex/vertex φand fold angle θ (a) Single crystal structure of angle cone (b) Boundary of angle cones Fig. 3-9: Screw growth model of spheroidal graphite Fig. 3-10: Internal structure of graphite spheroid under TEM [1] February 2010 85 Serial Report The undercooling formed due to change of solidification rate is called thermal undercooling. The faster the cooling rate, the bigger the undercooling, since under fast cooling, atoms diffuse difficultly, thus causes crystallisation to occur at lower temperature. The reason why thermal undercooling is beneficial for graphite spheroidal growth is that fast cooling causes carbon atoms in graphite crystal to extremely quick shrink, giving rise to local stress concentration and increased crystal defects. In addition, fast cooling causes voids or vacancies in graphite crystal clustering or aggregation; then the voids clusters collapse, creating new defects and resulting in increase of screw dislocations. The second undercooling is constitutional undercooling (△T c) consists of two parts[68]: Fig.3-12: Undercooling caused by chemical composition [68] (a) ― Constitutional undercooling (b) ― Constitutional undercoolingplus kinetic undercooling gcs ― Liquidus temperature g ― Temperature gradient in the liquid Fig. 3-13: Influence of cooling rate and remaining Mg content on undercooling of a SG iron [69] 1: w(Mg) = 0. 005%,2: w(Mg) = 0.016%,3: w(Mg) = 0.049% △T c = △T cs + △Tk Where △T cs ― constitutional undercooling (caused by solute redistribution during crystal growth); △Tk ― kinetic undercooling (produced by absorption of active elements on the surface of graphite, thus delaying crystallisation). Superposition of the two types of undercooling is illustrated in Fig. 3-12. Therefore, the undercooling of any casting consists of three parts: thermal, constitutional and kinetic undercooling: △T = △T t + △T cs + △Tk Figure 3-13 shows the influence of cooling rate and remaining Mg content on undercooling of a SG iron, which reflects the influence of thermal undercooling △T t and kinetic undercooling △Tk on total undercooling. Under normal casting conditions, it is difficult to obtain the necessary undercooling for graphite spheroidisation to occur, from the cooling rate alone. Therefore, it is necessary to increase undercooling by altering the composition. The influence of various elements on the undercooling of an iron melt is divided into three types, see Table 3-8. The influence of the three types of elements on the growth process of graphite is: First type: elements causing kinetic undercooling. Elements such as Mg, Y, Ce, La, etc, belong to this type. The functions of these elements are: (1) Deoxidise and desulphurise; eliminate the retarding or blocking effect on the outlets of screw dislocations, activate the growth steps, and ensure carbon atoms continue to deposit, thus making growth velocity along the c-axis greater than that along the a-axis, vc > va. (2) Significantly purify the iron melt, thus increasing kinetic undercooling. (3) The stress due to elements embedding in graphite lattice causes high density of screw dislocation [70]. Since Mg and Ce are also active elements, which are easily absorbed onto the graphite interface, excessive Mg and Ce can retard or block the graphite steps, in the same way as S and O do, therefore resulting in a poor graphite shape. Second type: elements causing constitutional undercooling. Si is the main element causing constitutional undercooling [68]; Si is not absorbed on the graphite crystal surface and does not react with graphite. This type of element, which is enriched in the liquid in front of graphite growth, increases constitutional undercooling and instability of graphite growth, causing the graphite to branch strongly. Experiments found that in a pure Fe-C alloy without Fig. 3-11: Under different circumstances, effect of undercooling on growth velocity of graphite (1010) and (0001) planes, v (a) Polluted environment (b) Pure environment (c) Environment with spheroidising elements A- Growth velocity on the rotating twin step vst; B- Two dimensional nucleation velocity v2D; C- Screw defect growth velocity vsc 86 CHINA FOUNDRY Vol.7 No.1 extremely unstable conditions [74]. With increasing undercooling, various defects increase and the instability of growth increases significantly, thus the growth mode of graphite gradually changes from type (1) to type (7); growth gradually develops towards conical pyramids. Figure 3-14 shows the relationship between undercooling (ΔT) and unstable growth of graphite. Minkoff considered that for some hexagonal substances such as graphite, silicon, diamond and BN (boron nitride), their growth morphologies are all related to undercooling. Under high interface undercooling, sub-structures are induced by thermal stress, which make the layers of pyramidal crystals unstable, increasing branching tendency, thus promoting the formation of spheroids; see Fig. 3-15. Elliott suggested [75] that under certain conditions of cooling rate, desirable graphite morphology could be obtained by adjusting composition and carefully balancing trace element content to control undercooling. 2. Growth velocity of basal plane greater than that of prism plane Increased undercooling will readily increase various point, line absorption of S and O onto the prism plane, increases the growth velocity of the prism plane, and makes va > vc. Table 3-9 shows the relationship between the growing thickness of various crystal planes and S content. sulphur, Si promotes the formation of strongly branched coral graphite. Also, when pouring low sulphur (w(S) = 0.007%) and high Si (w(Si) = 11.22%) liquid iron into thin section castings, spheroidal graphite can be obtained [65]. In addition to Si, Bi has a similar effect. In a Ni-C alloy treated with w(B) = 4%, graphite precipitates as spheroids [57]. Third type: active elements S, O. Elements S and O are subversive elements, which inhibit graphite spheroidisation; they are prone to being absorbed on the graphite crystal face, and increase the graphite growth temperature, thus making the graphite crystallisation temperature closer to equilibrium temperature. S and O decrease kinetic undercooling and cause graphite to grow towards the stable type, thus decreasing the branching tendency [68]. S and O are absorbed preferentially on the outlets of screw dislocations (has the lowest potential there); they inhibit the growth of screw dislocations and promote the development of rotating twins [71]. In addition, the bond energy forming covalent bonds C-O and C-S between S and O with C atoms is far greater than that of C-C [72], which accelerates the Type 1. Active spheroidisation elements 2. Elements causing constitutional undercooling 3. Active impurity elements Element Group Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and La and Ce rare earths Group Ⅳ (mainly Si and B) Group Ⅵ (mainly S and O) Present form Strong absorption on graphite crystal surface and close combination with S and O No absorption on graphite crystal surface, but enrichment in the liquid in graphite growth front Absorption on graphite crystal surface Effect Increase kinetic undercooling Increase constitutional undercooling Reduce kinetic undercooling Table 3-8: Effect of elements on the undercooling of iron melt w(S)(%) 0 0.04 0.10 0.40 Basal plane/prism plane 1.8 1.7 1.0 0.5 vc and va vc> va vc> va vc= va vc< va Table 3-9: Relationship between growing thickness of various crystal planes and S content [72] Composition Bi Sb Pb Ce As Sn Al Ti hypo-eutectic 4,636 3,000 2,740 1,995 1,400 1,420 832 0 hyper-eutectic 2,896 2,000 1,544 980 1,060 1,010 840 0 Table 3-10: Activity of some surface-active elements in the iron melt (unit ×10-5 N/cm) The relationship between spheroidal graphite growth and undercooling is apparent. With increased undercooling, the following variations of graphite growth occur: 1. Instability of graphite growth increases The instability of graphite growth refers to the growing trend of graphite not following hexagonal ring plane spreading growth. According to the severity of undercooling, there exist seven modes of unstable growth of graphite [68]: (1) Primary graphite branches on the (1010) plane in the form of dendrites. (2) Eutectic graphite branches on the edges of the graphite. (3) Step instability occurs on the graphite surface and branches are extended.(4) The branches extending from steps leave the crystal surface, protrude into the liquid and continue to grow. (5) The graphite protruding into the liquid grows by rotating around itself. (6) Cone pyramid branches grow on (0001) plane. (7) Pyramid branches extend with (1010) plane as their outer surface. Among them, the pyramid crystal is a spiral polyhedral cone consisting of many hexagons, and formed by rotating twin dislocation transmitting into screw dislocation; pyramid crystals are the result of graphite growing under In addition to S and O, many trace subversive elements such as Bi, Pb, Sb and As also belong to the group of surface active elements. Their subversive effect is related to the surface activity value; the higher the surface activity, the stronger the subversive effect [73]. Table 3-10 lists the activity of some surface-active elements in the iron melt. Whether the subversive mechanism of those elements is similar to that S and O still need further study. February 2010 87 Serial Report Fig. 3-15: Relationship of growth morphologies of ice, graphite, silicon, diamond and boron nitride (BN) with undercooling[74] (morphology of ice is not affected by undercooling) Fig. 3-16: Relationship between undercooling and graphite morphology [77] Fig.3-14: Relationship between undercooling (ΔT) and unstable growth of graphite [68] a → b→ c→ d undercooling gradually increases The ratio of growth velocity of basal plane to growth velocity of prism plane of graphite crystal is closely related to graphite growth morphologies. Only when vc > va graphite is possible to grow into rod, angle cone, pyramid and even spheroidal graphite consisting of many cones; otherwise, graphite can only grow into flakes. It can be seen from Table 3-11, with changing of va/vc > 1 to va/ vc < 1, graphite changes from type A→ type B → undercooled D type → coral → vermicular → spheroidal shape. If vc is far greater than va, and with irregular branching, graphite will change from spheroidal to exploded and over-treated graphite. Changing solidification velocity can result in different undercooling, which can be used to control graphite morphology. With increasing solidification, graphite shape changes from flake to spheroidal, see Fig. 3-16. When undercooling ΔT is smaller than critical undercooling ΔT 0, the growth velocity on prism plane is greater than that of basal plane, graphite grows into flake, otherwise, when vc > va, graphite grows to spheroidal morphology. It is known from production practices that the processing measures to make graphite grow as spheroids are: (a) change chemical composition; (b) control cooling rate. Among chemical compositions, the important elements influencing graphite growth are those that can change the undercooling tendency of liquid iron. Other factors that significantly change the undercooling tendency of liquid iron are section thickness of the casting, mould material, pouring temperature and pouring rate. In principle, the essence of these process conditions is to alter the undercooling status of graphite crystallization. Using a schematic diagram, see Fig. 3-17, the author summarized the relationship between processing conditions for obtaining spheroidal graphite iron and defect growth mechanism influencing graphite spheroidisation. It can be seen from the figure that the aim of spheroidisation is to change kinetic and plane defects during the growth of graphite, thus increasing the density of screw dislocations, resulting in vc > va. If it can be ensured that every single graphite crystal has vc > va, then ‘regular branching’ (particular branching) conditions are easily satisfied. 88 CHINA FOUNDRY Vol.7 No.1 Table 3-11: Relationship between the ratio of growth velocities of graphite prism to basal plane va/vc and graphite morphology[76] undercooling of the liquid iron. As for the reason why inoculation can improve spheroidisation effect, the author considered that it might be due to the constitutional undercooling of local regions resulting from Si concentration fluctuation. Nevertheless, the following situations exist in high temperature iron melts [68]: (1) The growth of a spheroidal crystal is an unstable growth process, which is very sensitive to any small variation in physical environment, temperature, and composition. (2) The composition of liquid iron is very difficult to control accurately, especially for those trace elements having an important effect on graphite growth. (3) Below the temperature at which graphite growth occurs, some elements will react with each other, causing composition of the iron to change continuously, within a small range. (4) Segregation of elements in castings will influence the distribution of trace elements, thus causing important variations of graphite morphology. (5) In addition to acting with graphite, the elements Mg and Ce (added to increase undercooling), will also react locally with other elements in the liquid iron surrounding the graphite. This will cause a concentration of the active elements Mg and Ce around the graphite, to vary continuously. All these factors make the formation of spheroidal graphite very complex. In addition to undercooling, absorption and interface phenomena also inevitably influence the formation process of graphite spheroids. Therefore, the author has recognized that the model in Figure 3-17 cannot explain all the phenomena involved in graphite spheroidisation. Fig. 3-17: Relationship between processing conditions and growth mechanisms of spheroidal graphite Be continued
Compartilhar