Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
edited by: MICHAEL R. SLABAUGH HELEN J. JAMES Weber State College Ogden. Utah 84408 A. Elena Charola Metropolitan Museum of Art', New York, NY 10028 One of the first reactions taught in most elementarychem- istry courses is the neutralization reaction in which the di- rection depends on the relative strengths of the species in- volved, that is, the reaction goes from a "strong acid" to a "weak" acid: acid 1 + base 2 F. acid 2 + base I Yet few people are capable of identifying this type of reac- tion when they see it occurring in everyday life. One of the unfortunate examples is the reaction produced by "acid rain" on marble monuments. What Is "Acid Rain"? Rain is naturally slightly acidic because of the presence of CO, in the air that dissolves in the water to form carbonic acid. The reaction can he written in a simplistic way as: H,O + CO, e H,CO, a Ht +HCO,- (1) "Natural" rain has a pH of about 5.13.~ In urban or highly industrialized areas, other gases of an acidic nature are produced from combustion of fuels. Of these, the most common are the oxides of sulfur and nitro- gen. In the case of sulfur, SO2 is the gas most commonly produced. Under the influence of UV light and through catalytic action of dust particles, building surfaces, and oth- er agents, SO, can he oxidized to SO3 by the oxygen or ozone in the air. The SO3 then dissolves in water to produce sulfu- ric acid. The reaction can be written as: H,O + SO, e H,SO, F! Ht + HS0,- (2) The pH of this rain depends on the concentration of SOs; the ' Current address: ICCROM, 13, via di San Michele. 00153 Roma, Italy. The pH of "natural" rain can be calculated from the following equilibria ( 15): CO, (g) + H,O F! H&O, logK = -1.46 H&03 z= Ht + HC0,- lag K, = -6.36 and knowing that the atmospheric level of Con is 0.0003 aim. From the first equation the concentration of dissolved carbonic acid can be calculated: Knowing this concentration the pH can be calculated from the second equilibrium: [HtI2 = K, X 1.04 X 10@ = 4.54 X 10-l2 pH = 5.6 rain will have a lower pH where this concentration is higher: urban areas. hieh traffic areas. and industrialized areas. The pH will chakggduring the time the rain falls. At the begin- ning of the rain, the concentration of SO3 in the air will he highest, and rain will have its lowest pH value. Values as low as pH 3 or lower have been actually measured. This repre- sents a thousandfold increase of H+ concentration with re- spect to normal rain! Similar reactions could he written for the case of the nitrogen oxides. but this discussion will he limited to those of t h i sulfur oxides mentioned above. The term "acid rain" was coined as a conseauence of the observed lowering of the pH. The problem, though, is not so simple. and the currentlv preferred term is "acid ~ r e c i ~ i t a - tioi2'. This term is more comprehensive and inciudei not only "wet deposition", the deposition of pollutants in the presence of water, as when i t rains or snows; but also "dry deposition", the settling of gaseous or solid pollutants, such asaerosols and dust in the absence of water: Whlch Stones Are Used to Make Monuments? The stone usually associated with monuments is marble, a calcareous stone. made from large crvstals of calcite. the thermodynamically stable mineray form of CaC03. ~ a r b l e is a metamorphic rock, that is, it is a rock that has undergone recrystallization a t high temperatures and under great pres- sures. Before this process, the stone existed as a sedimentary rock, called limestone. Limestone is made up of much small- er crvstals of calcite that were "sedimented" toaether, usual- ly under water. Chemically, marble and limestone are identi- cal, hut morphologically they differ in crystal size and poros- ity. Limestone is made from smaller crystals and is therefore more porous than marble. This difference affects the ap- pearance and "workability" of the stone. Because marble can attain amuch higher polish than limestone, the former is preferred for monuments. Limestone, however, is used ex- tensively in buildings. For example, Rockefeller Center in New York Citv is constructed of Indiana limestone, one of the most popuiar limestones in the United States. Sandstone also has been used for monuments. but in the United States it has been used mainly for buildings, an example of which is the New York City brownstone. Sand- stone is a sedimentary rock made of sand, which-for the purposes of this discussion-will be limited to mean quartz, the thermodynamically stable mineral form of SiO,. The grains of sand can he cemented together by either more quartz, or by calcareous material. In the latter case, the stone would be called a calcareous sandstone. Granite is the third of the important stones used in monu- ment construction. This rock is made up of three main min- erals: quartz, mica, and feldspar. Mica is actually a group of minerals composed of silicates of aluminum, potassium, 436 Journal of Chemical Education magnesium, and iron. The feldspars are aluminosilicates of calcium, sodium, and/or potassium. Usually granites are large-grained, and the different minerals can be identified visually: the transparent quartz, the white or pinkish feld- soar. and the black mica. The porosity of granite is extreme- . . Iy low; consequently, it is usually used as a damp-proof barrier i n the Iuwer C U U ~ S C S of buildings. How Are the Stones Affected by the Acld Rain? Stone monuments most susceptible to acid rain are those made of the calcareous ones: marble, limestone, and calcare- ous sandstones. Pure sandstones and granites are not affect- . ed by acid rain. The reaction between a calcareous stone and acid rain can be written in this simplified form: H,SO, + CaCO, e Ca2+ + S02- + H20 + C02 (3) The dissolution of calcite involves more equilibria than the simple one represented by eq 3. The evidence suggests that three reactions occur simultaneously (I): CaCO, + H' E? Ca2+ + HCO,? (4) CaCO, + H2C0, G Ca2+ + 2 ~ ~ 0 , - (5 ) CaCO, + H20 a Ca2+ + HC03- + OH- (6) The different mechanisms controlling the dissolution of calcite depend on several conditions: pH, flow hydrodynam- ics, etc. Below pH -4 the dissolution is transport controlled, and the rate is proportional to the H+ activity in the solution (1-4). The dissolution is based mainly on the pH-dependent mechanism represented in eq 4. The higher the concentra- tion of acid (actually the activity) the higher the dissolution rate. Between pH -4 and 6, the rate of dissolution is less than that expected for transport control, and the reaction would appear to be controlled by surface kinetics (1,5-7). Hydro- dynamic flow conditions, the pressure of COz, and the homo- geneous reactions of this compound in the hulk fluid and/or boundary layer (eq 1) begin to assume important roles. As the pH rises above 6, the reaction tends to become pH- independent mechanism and the rate is surface controlled (8) . For this discussion, the interesting range is the intermedi- ate one, roughly between pH 4 and 6. As previously stated, several mechanisms affect the dissolution rate of calcite, and the dominant mechanism depends on the specific conditions in a given location. Inasmuch as conditions can vary drasti- cally even on the surface of a single monument, several mechanisms can he operating simultaneously on areas close to each other. The marble columns of the Roman emperors Marcus Aur- elius and Trajan, in Rome, illustrate the point well. The columns are carved in bas-relief bands that spiral around the column representing the conquests and victories of these emperors. Some areas of these monuments receive directflow of rainwater over them, and the damage observed is greatly increased by the hydrodynamic factors that com- pound the simple chemical dissolution of the marble. Other areas are more protected, due to wind effects induced by the buildings around the column, and these surfaces are still in extremely good condition, even though the column has been standing for over 1800 years! It is important to point out that the damage resulting from chemical dissolution of calcium carbonate is mainly a sur- face phenomenon. This surface damage is of special concern when the details on the finely worked relief are only some centimerrrs in depth. The strktural integrity of the marhle drums is not affected, however, by this surface dissolution. Rut the oroblem of the deterioration of monuments is - -. . - - - L~~~ ~ ~ even more complicated than the dissolution of calcite. Equa- tion 3 shows that the calcium carbonate of the stone reacts to . ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ produce calcium sulfate. This compound can crystallize as a dihydrate salt, CaSOc2H20, a mineral called gypsum. Gyp- sum is fairly soluble in water and therefore only accumulates on those surfaces of the reacted stone over which there is no direct, substantial flow of water. Limestone buildings and marble statues develop a layer of gypsum in those areas protected from rain, s;ch as under eaves or overhangs. Be- cause urban air is polluted by dust, carbon particles, fly-ash, and other combu&ion products (dry deposition), this layer of gypsum blackens. After years in an urban environment, limestone buildings present a characteristic black and white appearance: white where the rain washes off the reaction product (gypsum) from the stone surface regularly; black where the rain cannot wash away the dark gypsum layer that has incorporated into itself the dry deposition. Acid rain will not react with sandstone buildings or the granite courses on buildings and monuments. However, dry deposition still occurs, and this will adhere to the stone causing a uniform black color to develop. The soluble sulfate and nitrate salts that form in the reaction of calcareous stones with acid rain subsequently dissolve in the same rainwater. This solution penetrates the stone by capillary action. When the stone dries out, the salts crvstallize in the nore svstem. The pressures exerted by - ~ ,~~~ rhesecrystallizing saltsare sufficient todiarupt the matrixof the $tone rnechanicalls (12-14). IT is e\.ident then, that the porosity of a stonr is one of the important factors determin- ing itsdurability since it nmtrols theam~,untufs(~lution chat wzl penetrate the pore system. The damage produced by this type of mechanical action can he more serious than that produced by simple chemical dissolution of the stone. Conclusions The deterioration of calcareous stones occurs mainly through two mechanisms: . the chemical dissolurionofcalcire . the mechanical damage x hen wluble salts formed dllr- ing cliss.,lurrun ~uhs~~uenrly rccn.srnlli,e in the pores oi the stone. The first mechanism is important when surface detail is to he preserved on a sculpture. The second mechanism can contrihute significantly to the structural deterioration of the stone. Current research involves the difficult task of deter- mining the extent to which each of these factors contribute to the overall decay of a statue or monument. DC. 1979; Pp 537-573. 3. caner. E. N.: smloy, N.J. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d i n g r of the ~ h i r d lnrernotionol congress an the D~fsr iorol ion and Preservation o/Sfone: (publisher needed) Venim, 1979; pp 107- 129. 4. Wey1.P. K. J. G d . 1958,66,163-176. 5. Plummer, L.N.; Wig1ey.T. M. L. Ceochirn. Camochirn. Aefa 1976,40,191102. 6. ~url,~.~.S~~~tion~inoti~~~/~nleit~:~hoFou~hInternationslCongrosaofSpsleol- agy: Yugoslavia, 1968: pp 6146. 7. Guidobaldi, F. In The Conssr"alionof SLoneII: Ro~si-Manare& R., Ed.;Centroper 1s Conservezione delle Sculture all' Apertm Bologna, 1981; pp 483-497. 8. Sjoherg. E. L. Oeochirn. Cosrnachim. Acla 1976.40.441-447. 9. CUIPIOI, R. L.; RathernVJne,J. D. B.Science 1981,213,1018-1019. 10. Rands, D. G.: Rmenov, J. A.; Laughlin. J. S. Proreedings of the Confersnes on D<grod.fion nfMofrr iuls due to Acid Rain; American Chemical society: Washing- ton, DC, in press. 11. Charuls. A. E.: Koestler. R. J. wiener Belichtp ubpr Nduruissensehofl in dar Kunat, in press. 12. Lewin. S. 2. Conservolion o f Historic Stone Buildings ond Monummts; National This brief introduction to the topic has not taken into account other phenomena: the reprecipitation of calcite near the surface (9) or the effect of high ionic strength (10) and particle size distribution (11) on the solubility of calcite. Volume 64 Number 5 May 1987 437
Compartilhar