Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
1 Case study : Brainly CASE STUDY: TELLING THE RIGHT STORY TO GET C-LEVEL, PRODUCT OWNERS, AND ENGINEERS ON BOARD FOR SEO PROJECTS INDUSTRY: E-LEARNING DATE: MAY 2020 2 Case study : Brainly TA BL E O F CO N TE N TS About Brainly About Murat Yatağan Website structure at the heart of digital marketing Confronting SEO deadends Leveraging SEO storytelling Results OnCrawl as seen by Murat Yatağan 03 04 05 09 12 21 25 3 Case study : Brainly ABOUT BRAINLY Brainly is the world’s largest online community, uniting students, parents and teachers in solving their academic problems and exchanging knowledge. Brainly has 200 million monthly unique users from 35+ countries. Proving that questions lead to more than just answers, 84% of users claim Brainly has increased their curiosity. About Murat Yatağan: Vice President of Growth @Brainly Murat Yatağan is Vice President of Growth at Brainly. He has more than 12 years of SEO and UX expertise, of which 5 years derive from his role as Senior Product Analyst at Google Search Quality Team (aka Trust & Safety) in Ireland. During his consultancy career he built significant experience in technical SEO, high-quality content creation strategy, outreach, and international SEO. He has managed SEO teams for key players in different market niches and maintained a portfolio of 100+ clients globally from various business verticals. WEBSITE STRUCTURE AT THE HEART OF DIGITAL MARKETING 6 WEBSITE STRUCTURE AT THE HEART OF DIGITAL MARKETING Case study : Brainly Brainly’s online learning offer is based on the ability to offer quality answers to real questions from students and their parents. Murat’s experience and intuition indicated that the possibilities for organic growth were conditioned by the website’s internal linking structure and the types of pages that this structure indicated as important to search engines like Google. This key fact is also backed up by the data that he collected. To demonstrate the importance of internal links, Murat segmented Brainly’s website by type of page. He then used OnCrawl to analyze server log data for each type of page, and cross-analyzed this information with information in OnCrawl on organic visits. Two types of pages and the relation between them emerged as a central element. From left to right, the page types “questions”, “answers” and “profiles” emerged as dominating the site’s landscape. 7 WEBSITE STRUCTURE AT THE HEART OF DIGITAL MARKETING Case study : Brainly Question pages Brainly’s question pages are the greatest providers of organic traffic to the site: Therefore, ranking question pages for ultra-precise, long-tail queries is key to Brainly’s business model. Consequently, optimizing these pages for search engines is a top priority. As part of their optimization, these pages benefit from close attention to their on-page SEO, as well as the use of Schema mark-up and other strategies to make them perform better in search. In this particular project, optimizing the amount of attention available from Googlebots to crawl and index question pages would become a central question. The number of organic visits to question pages accounts for the largest part of organic traffic to the site. 8 WEBSITE STRUCTURE AT THE HEART OF DIGITAL MARKETING Case study : Brainly Profile pages Most of the internal links on question pages point to profile pages. Profile pages play an important role in the UX of the website by providing an assurance of the answer quality through more information about the user: • Community rating • Past activity • Expertise Since these pages provide information to users, but little SEO value for ranking Brainly for the long-tail keywords it thrives on, these are not the pages Murat wanted Google to see. CONFRONTING SEO DEADENDS 10 CONFRONTING SEO DEADENDS Case study : Brainly Despite the low SEO value of the profile pages, they receive a very large number of links from other pages within the website, which misleadingly inflates their importance in the eyes of Google. However, modifying profile pages or their internal links were not an option: • As legacy pages being interdependent on other platforms, profile pages weren’t prioritized to be updated for several years. • Because of the technological debt, the development teams de- prioritized projects associated with profile pages. • As pages with little marketing value, there was no business reason to justify the resources needed to index them. This created a major roadblock for Murat and his team. Due to the number of internal links pointing to profile pages—and particularly inlinks from question pages to profile pages—, Brainly’s website signals relatively lower importance of question pages, even though these are the most valuable pages in Brainly’s SEO strategy. Comparison of the number of internal links to the different types of pages. 11 CONFRONTING SEO DEADENDS Case study : Brainly This diluted page rank limits the efficiency and results of future SEO projects: any improvement that can be made to the indexing and ranking of question pages is mitigated by the internal linking structure of the website. • The inability to implement the usual solutions: Inability to transform low-value pages into indexable ones due to resource allocation Inability, for UX reasons, to remove links • Resistance from the development teams: lack of enthusiasm • Resistance from product teams: lack of importance given to legacy pages • Resistance from C-level: no available resources LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 12 Case study : Brainly LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 13 Case study : Brainly To find a solution, Murat realized he would have to explain the ROI of SEO for question pages, and show the value of the project. While Brainly already used OnCrawl for data insight generation and regular monitoring, Murat took things a step further. He was able to clearly demonstrate the problem using OnCrawl to each of the different groups of collaborators at Brainly who needed to be on board in order to mobilize the resources to solve the internal linking problem. This is one project where OnCrawl was a real game-changer for me and my team. We use many tools, but this is the one that was able to make the difference to get a strategic project off the ground. — Murat Yatağan LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 14 Case study : Brainly C-level decision-makers When approaching C-level decision-makers, Murat had to sell the ROI of the project. The question in the forefront of everyone’s mind at C-level is: What about this project will take us to the next level? The key to getting C-level on board was to first demonstrate the problem in a way that could be understood. Restructuring the website structure by targeting the links between question pages and profile pages was low hanging fruit. With the right technical solution, it would mobilize a single developer for a few sprints to make a big impact. But more importantly, it would open the door for more important projects to come. It would help Google see and rank Brainly’s website better, which wouldn’t be possible while the page rank of question pages was still depreciated. So I could pitch this project as the first step to improve the ROI of all of our future SEO projects. — Murat Yatağan We aren’t getting as much traffic to our questions as we should, because Google’s attention is going elsewhere. We need to open space for Google to access our pages. — Murat Yatağan LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 15 Case study : Brainly Concretely, Murat could demonstrate that 30-60% of Googlebot hits were “wasted”, privileging profile pages excessively when compared to question pages. The next step was to show the usefulness vs the cost of the project. Murat needed to demonstrate that the project was: • Low risk: the project was not complex or hard to predict • Low cost: thetechnical solution Murat imagined would only require 1 engineer for only a few sprints • Easy to measure/monitor: quantitative data was available to measure the actions and the results • Impactful: there was a business benefit to be gained from the success of this project Murat was able to accomplish this using OnCrawl to show: • The number of internal links, and the percentage of these that pointed to profile pages. The number of links pointing to profile pages clearly outweighed the pages’ importance. Despite the significantly lower number of profile pages, they account for approximately 60% of the internal linking power in the website’s architecture. LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 16 Case study : Brainly • The way the website structure would look if these links were removed. OnCrawl illustrated in one click how question pages would benefit if profile pages were no longer taken into account by Google. • The importance of internal links in ranking pages. Across the website, the Inrank of the page and the number of internal links to the page made the difference between pages ranked on page 1 of the SERPs and pages that missed the cut. Without links to (or from) profile pages, the website architecture is dominated by question pages, supported by the archives. Brainly’s pages that rank on Page 1 have up to 30x the number of inlinks, and a significant portion of the website’s page rank. LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 17 Case study : Brainly • The number of question and profile pages crawled daily. Profile pages were easy to spot as one of the single largest consumers of crawl budget hits, even though they were rarely ranked. • The clear correlation between crawl frequency and rank. It wasn’t enough to show the relationship between internal links and crawl frequency. The relationship between crawl frequency and Brainly’s end goal—more users—had to also be clear. Distribution of bot hits for non-question pages. The majority of Google’s attention is concentrated on profile pages (in blue). The more Googlebot hits, the more impressions: Only the pages that receive the most Googlebot hits rank and generate impressions. The other 90% of pages that Googlebot visits less frequently do not rank, or do not rank well enough to generate significant impressions. LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 18 Case study : Brainly The quantitative metrics that Murat was easily able to provide with OnCrawl made all the difference. They also provided measurable conditions for success to further reassure C-level of the project’s logic and feasibility: by changing the number of links, Murat aimed to modify the behavior of Googlebots and of website visitors. To provide transparency and set measurable conditions for success, the only thing he needed to do was to use OnCrawl to track SEO sessions, Googlebot visits, and internal links from one group of pages to another. LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 19 Case study : Brainly Project Owners With the approval of C-level decision-makers, Murat then needed to obtain the buy-in of project owners by showing the big picture and aligning his project with their teams’ goals. Using OnCrawl, Murat could show the link between the work he wanted done on internal links and the big picture for the e-learning product. He demonstrated that he understood the product team’s objectives, and showed how this SEO project could impact them directly. We’re working to obtain more visitors. More visitors mean more answers, and more answers mean more questions. More questions provide the ability to scale the product. (And that means more resources for the product team.) — Murat Yatağan LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 20 Case study : Brainly Engineers In order to contribute efficiently, engineers need to understand the value behind their involvement. Murat ran a technical workshop to help engineers understand why the modifications he was asking for were important. The workshop used data drawn from OnCrawl ensured that the engineers had a basic understanding of SEO principles, particularly those that contributed to this project: • Internal page popularity • Internal linking structure • Crawl budget • Correlations between crawl budget and direct ranking factors He presented ways to measure and influence these key metrics, and showed how Brainly’s site performed. LEVERAGING SEO STORYTELLING 21 Case study : Brainly The problem was now obvious to them, and they could propose different solutions that were coherent with Brainly’s SEO. Armed with a better understanding of the issue and their role in the solution, developers showed much greater investment and motivation. RESULTS 23 RESULTS Case study : Brainly With the help of OnCrawl, Murat was able to obtain the approval and the resources for this project. The project quickly made an impact, and results were already visible within a few weeks. Optimized internal links As Murat predicted, optimizing internal links improved the page depth for question pages, increased the overall InRank (OnCrawl’s measure of internal popularity) of question pages, and improved the crawl distribution of Googlebot hits. • Average InRank for question pages improved by over 20% • 90% of questions move from 8th-9th place to 3rd-4th place in depth • Question pages showed a 30-40% increase in crawl rate 24 RESULTS Case study : Brainly Improved growth of year-over-year Monthly Unique Users The key business metric for Murat and Brainly’s SEO team is the monthly unique user. Murat therefore promised results that could be measured in year-over-year growth of monthly unique users. • Overdelivery on forecasted results by 30%. Improved engineering work The training session for Brainly’s web engineers yielded unplanned but not unexpected results. The engineers reported that their understanding of the processes and the principles behind Murat’s requests led directly to: • Better useability testing • Ability to design better back-end microservices • Fewer project errors 25 RESULTS Case study : Brainly Smoothing the way for future projects Another unintentional result was the C-level support for the next steps. Murat found that after this project, he already had the buy-ins he would need when he started talking about another big idea: crawl latency analysis. The idea is to compare the time between when a question is published, when it is crawled, and when it first receives organic visits. This would give Brainly a better understanding of how when they release content affects how Google sees the site. In turn, Brainly could then improve its organization with content operations in order to gain more users. This could require more development in order to implement it on the site. It would also likely change the processes and workflows of the entire content department. However, Murat found the idea gained immediate support. At the C-level when I present my ideas, I can tell that there’s a lot of confidence. I’d still like to bring the data to the table, because you can’t make good decisions without the data to back it up. But when I say, ‘here’s what I’d like to do next,’ the response now is mostly, ‘that sounds like a good direction to move in. — Murat Yatağan 26 Case study : Brainly ONCRAWL AS SEEN BY MURAT YATAĞAN “ What made OnCrawl so valuable to use in this project was the ability to cross-analyze all of the available data in one place. It’s my SEO log analyzer, but it also draws on extensive crawl data and information like impressions and clicks from Google. OnCrawl uses all of these sources of information in its analyses. Without that, I wouldn’t have had easy access to the numbers and charts I needed to tell the right story to the people I needed to work with. And that’s what really made the difference for this project.” “For me, this project was much less about restructuring the website’s internal links. That was what we did. But what thiswas really about was taking a small but extremely strategic project that no one wanted to do, and using OnCrawl and SEO data to get the support we needed at all levels.” — Murat Yatağan 27 Case study : Brainly Start your 14-day free trial hello@oncrawl.com www.oncrawl.com https://app.oncrawl.com/signup mailto:hello@oncrawl.com http://www.oncrawl.com https://www.facebook.com/oncrawl/ https://twitter.com/OnCrawl_FR?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor https://www.linkedin.com/company/cogniteev/?originalSubdomain=fr
Compartilhar