Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
American Humor Studies Association Becoming Benny The Evolution of Jack Benny's Character Comedy from Vaudeville to Radio Author(s): Kathryn H. Fuller-Seeley Source: Studies in American Humor, Vol. 1, No. 2, SPECIAL ISSUE American Humor Across Media in the 1920s and 1930s (2015), pp. 163-191 Published by: Penn State University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/studamerhumor.1.2.0163 Accessed: 19-09-2016 21:22 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/studamerhumor.1.2.0163?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms American Humor Studies Association, Penn State University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in American Humor This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Studies in American Humor, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2015 Copyright © 2015 The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA a b s t r a c t : This case study traces the evolution of Jack Benny’s comedy practices as he moved across entertainment systems from vaudeville to radio in the early 1930s. The core of his comic identity endured—his self-deprecating humor—but other facets of his comic iden- tity shifted and changed in reaction to the new environment. Facing the daunting challenge of filling radio’s unprecedented, ferocious demand for new content, Jack Benny struggled but ultimately thrived by developing new approaches to comedy. Benny and writer Harry Conn began to craft a personality-based radio variety program that moved from Benny’s vaudeville monologues to expanding the narrative world of the show with dialogue and skits. They cre- ated characters out of the show’s performers, put them in situations, and turned Benny into a “fall guy” character, the butt of his cast’s insulting jokes. K e y w o r d s : comedy, radio, vaudeville, Jack Benny, situation comedy, character, comic persona Anticipation mixed with anxiety in the small glass-enclosed broadcasting stu- dio installed in the old roof garden situated atop Broadway’s New Amsterdam Theater on Monday, May 2, 1932. Beginning at 9:30 p.m. EST, the inaugural episode of Canada Dry Ginger Ale’s new half-hour radio program aired live, carried over a network of NBC Blue radio stations covering the eastern por- tion of the nation. The only audience members were representatives from the show’s sponsor, advertising agency, and network. The program’s concept and cast had been assembled for Canada Dry by NBC executive Bertha Brainard as a new direction in sponsorship for the company, which had previously underwritten a dramatic (and violent) adventure series set in the Canadian becoming benny The Evolution of Jack Benny’s Character Comedy from Vaudeville to Radio K a T h R y n h . F u l l E R - S E E l E y StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 163 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 164 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR Rockies.1 Canada Dry’s advertising agency N. W. Ayer & Son billed the new show as “30 minutes of music and quips” featuring six numbers played by New York bandleader George Olsen and his orchestra with singing by his spouse, Ziegfeld Follies star Ethel Shutta. Already widely familiar to radio lis- teners, they were considered to be the main attraction of the show.2 The music would be interspersed with brief monologue segments performed by 38-year- old vaudeville veteran Jack Benny (1894–1974), who was introduced as “that suave comedian, dry humorist and famous master of ceremonies.”3 In his first performance for Canada Dry, Jack Benny told a series of jokes drawn from his well-honed stage routine, offering informal and genially self-deprecating comments on personal experiences such as his Hollywood adventures and the meagerness of his girlfriend, who posed for the “before” shots in “before and after” photos. By the conclusion of his fourth broadcast, Benny queasily real- ized he had used up nearly every monologue he had perfected over fifteen years in vaudeville and more broadcasts lay ahead of him.4 The new Canada Dry Program joined a rapidly increasing number of variety-comedy programs on primetime network radio. While music had been the dominant program form of the previous five years, the entertainment trade press noted that comedy was growing as a less expensive option for sponsors weary of paying for high-priced orchestras and temperamental crooners. New shows in the 1932 season featured not only newcomer Jack Benny but also other vaudevillians such as George Burns and Gracie Allen, George Jessel, Fred Allen, and Jack Pearl. Most, like Benny, were serving as emcees (short for M.C. or master of ceremonies) for programs that mixed music, comedy, and advertising messages. The new entrants joined such already-popular variety programs as those hosted by Rudy Vallee for Fleischman’s Yeast, Ed Wynn for Texaco, and Eddie Cantor for Chase and Sanborn Coffee.5 The pull of this growing entertainment medium, coupled with the push of steeply declining opportunities on Broadway and in vaudeville due to the Depression, propelled the apprehensive Benny to try his hand in radio.6 Facing the daunting challenge of filling radio’s unprecedented, ferocious demand for new content, Jack Benny struggled but ultimately thrived in the new medium by developing new approaches to comedy. Benny and script- writer Harry Conn began to craft a personality-based radio variety program, drawing on Benny’s vaudeville style and exploring new (to them) comic constructions of what contemporary critics termed character comedy and comedy situations. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 164 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 165 Experimenting as the program progressed from week to week, Benny and Conn expanded the narrative world of the show. They began develop- ing comic identities for the major performers (orchestra leader, vocalist, and announcer) who stood around the microphone. Framing the group as work- ers putting on a radio show, Benny and Conn developed a personality for each of them that blended reality and fiction. The cast became a stable of recognizable, quirky-yet-likeable continuing characters who could bounce off each other in informal exchanges in the studio or interact in situations from visiting the zoo, or having dinner at a cast member’s home, to perform- ing a parody of a popular new film. This variety greatly reduced Benny and Conn’s reliance on pat monologues and standard joke telling. What they developed was one example of the forerunner of the situation comedy, which would become much more prominent only fifteen years later in radio and television broadcasting in response to changing industrial practices and cultural norms.7 The duo could have created comic content for the program while leaving the “master of ceremonies” as the star, a dominant figure being fed straight- lines by subordinates, or by making him a pleasantly bland father figure who rode herd over his workplace family. This essay, using archival materi- als such as scripts and recordings and discourse in the entertainment trade press, demonstrates that,over a three-to-four year period, Benny and Conn gradually transformed the Jack Benny persona. Writer and performer transi- tioned the role from the vaudeville character of a suave but self- deprecating monologist (called by vaudeville critics the “sleekly bored joker”) to that of a vainglorious, hapless Fall Guy, a “negative exemplar,” in Steven Mintz’s terms, roundly (and ritually) roasted by his stable of zany stooges.8 Benny and Conn turned the humor around. Benny the emcee became the butt, not the mouthpiece, of most of the acerbic comic lines. The Jack Benny character of radio fame was their greatest creation and soon solidified Benny’s place as the premiere comedian in American radio. Benny’s Early Vaudeville Persona Born Benjamin Kubelsky in Waukegan, Illinois, Jack Benny spent more than twenty years developing a vaudeville identity that brought him, if not immense stardom, solid success as a musician who transitioned into a humorist who held a violin in one hand and a cigar in the other as he StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 165 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 166 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR joked. Working as a “single” who occasionally interacted with an assistant or other acts on the bill, Benny joined the expanding group of informal modern vaudeville hipsters whom we would know later as stand-up comics. Benny’s twist to the genre involved creating a “middling” personality who was neither young nor old, neither wealthy nor poor. He was not loud or buffoonish, and he related to a homogenizing American audience as much more Anglo-American than Jewish or ethnic.9 He was a midwestern variant of what vaudeville historians term “the Voice of the City.”10 Variety critic Robert Landry later asserted that Jack Benny’s stage manner had always seemed “big time,” even as it was perfected in the hinterlands of local theater orchestras, military camp shows, and smalltime vaudeville in the 1910s and early 1920s: [Benny’s] style was subdued, his delivery one of the first examples of modern “throw away.” He was poised, unhurried, seemingly effortless. . . . He was not an ad libber, in the general sense. He prepared his stuff ahead but changed it frequently, infused it with topical allusions. But he sounded ad lib.11 Landry acknowledged that Benny’s appeal was nevertheless somewhat lim- ited, because his act “demanded too much attention and quiet” to thrive either in noisy metropolitan nightclubs or among the rough-and-tumble milieu of hinterland vaudeville comics.12 Reviews of Jack Benny’s routine in the early 1920s commended the “reserve, poise and personality” of the monologist.13 “Jack Benny with his slow, easy patter, gets his crowd before he is well under way,” commented a typical critic, who also mentioned the mediocrity of Benny’s jokes.14 When he appeared in 1925 at New York’s Palace Theater, vaudeville’s pinnacle, Billboard praised Benny’s “droll delivery,” but also labeled his routine as being “a cross between the Frank Fay and Ben Bernie styles.”15 Initially, as Ben K. Benny (his early stage name), the act had superficially resembled that of deep-voiced bandleader Ben Bernie, who grasped a fiddle and embel- lished the punch lines of his jokes with the catch phrase “yowza yowza!”16 Bernie pressured the younger Benny to further modify his stage name to widen the perceived differences between them.17 The comparisons with Frank Fay continued, however, as Jack Benny unabashedly modeled his act on that of the well-known Irish-American comic. When Benny returned to the Palace in April 1926, Variety complimented his “excellent material and StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 166 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 167 delivery” and his witty interplay with other performers: “Stanley and Birns [the next act] came out early and asked to tell a story in Benny’s spot. Benny’s comments on the story were real funny. It was likable nonsense and a yell when Benny stopped [them] as he recognized it as a stag story.”18 Benny regu- larly re-enacted this routine with a female assistant whispering the salacious story in his ear, so that he could flirtatiously dance between polite and sexu- ally suggestive humor. When he incorporated it into a 1928 Vitaphone talkie short, a reviewer snarkily noted its similarities to a Frank Fay routine—“they can fight out who did it first.”19 Frank Fay’s urbane manner made him one of the most prominent and highest-paid performers in vaudeville.20 He was one of the first to enact the master of ceremonies role at the Palace and the nation’s other top theaters. Emcees had existed previously in minstrel shows (where they were called interlocutors) and in British music halls (where they were called compères) but Fay was said to have coined the term used in American vaudeville.21 The emcee role was an outgrowth of Fay’s innovative monologue act. Fay was one of the first stage comedians to eschew outlandish costumes, makeup, props, and broad physical shtick. The debonair redheaded, blue-eyed Fay dressed with impeccable, aristocratic style and moved with a feminine grace. His timing and delivery were judged “masterly.”22 He was a “boastful big city boulevardier” with a breezy delivery and relatively restrained, soft-spoken demeanor that covered a rapier wit. “Faysie” had a devastating ability to ad lib insults that could destroy any heckler in the audience. A Life Magazine profile described “his cockiness and his conceit . . . the gentle smile, the quiz- zical lift of the eyebrows, the sweet voice and then the dirty crack.”23 Fay did not depend on strings of one-liners, but was a storyteller whose collection of whimsical and digressive tales were peopled with everyday individuals, such as a family that obsessively saved string. Fay also sang stanzas of cur- rent songs like “Tea for Two,” stopping to dissect the absurdities of the lyr- ics along the way. He was elegant, suave, and superior—and made sure the audience knew it through his wicked repartee and stinging quips, perfect- ing what a critic called “an odd combination of humor and elegance.”24 Fay’s act was widely admired and copied by other comics, but offstage he was reviled for his bigotry, his alcoholism, and his massive ego (calling himself “Frank Fay, the World’s Greatest Comedian”). Fellow comic Fred Allen once cracked, “The last time I saw Fay, he was walking down Lover’s Lane holding his own hand.”25 StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 167 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 168 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR Vaudeville acts had traditionally followed each other on stage in quick succession, identified in printed programs and by title cards placed on an easel at the side of the stage. But as attendance began to dwindle, vaudeville managers began to add an extra attraction—a headliner such as Fay, Benny, Julius Tannen, or Georgie Jessel to present the show. The lead comic would appear not only in his own spot, but throughout the bill, introducing the acts, interacting with (or interrupting) other performers, ad- libbing patter between the spots, and filling time if needed by delays in the show. Some critics complained that this restructuring slowed the pace of the program, but the emcee’s performance made the disparate parts of the program seem more interconnected. This collaborative spirit imbued Jack Benny’s approach to the emcee role, whereas Fay took the opportu- nity to turn the spotlight on himself and dominate the entire proceedings. Benny did borrow Fay’s quiet charm, elegant manner, and womanly walk, but, lacking his quick and inventive tongue, replaced Fay’s arrogance and ad-libbedputdowns with carefully crafted lines that sounded off-the-cuff and included a subtle self-deprecation. “Benny’s opening line, which he used for years, was celebrated,” recalled vaudeville historian Maurice Zolotow. “He would casually lope toward the center of the stage, tuck his violin under his arm, brush his hair back with his left hand, and inquire of the maestro, ‘How is the show?’ ‘Fine up to now,’ the maestro would reply. ‘I’ll fix that!’ Benny would say.”26 Jack Benny rivaled Fay as one of the most frequent emcees at the Palace between 1927 and 1931.27 “Benny knows the Palace and its audiences there as few others do, knowing what else they like besides actor and show biz gags,” noted a reviewer, who also voiced the concern mentioned by other critics that Benny struggled to find enough new material to last through repeated view- ings.28 In Chicago, “Jack Benny, who had acted as M.C. throughout the bill, was refreshingly humorous in his easy, graceful way, his chatter and violin playing both going over big.”29 Vaudeville appeared increasingly unstable, however, so Benny experimented with other media forms. He appeared on Broadway in the 1927 Shubert Brothers’ revue The Great Temptations, but felt that the predominance of “blue” humor did not complement his style.30 He also tried his hand at the movies, riding the wave of talent from vaudeville and the legitimate theater flowing to Hollywood with the coming of talkies. However, after playing a prominent role as the emcee in MGM’s Hollywood StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 168 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 169 Revue of 1929 (Charles Reisner), his subsequent film roles (and reviews of his performances) were unsatisfying. In 1930 and 1931, as Benny moved his stage act from more intimate vaudeville venues to cavernous picture palaces (which also began adding headliners to their movie shows to shore up falling attendance), critics expressed concern that his work was too quiet and low-key to command 5,000-seat auditoriums. Although he did moderately well, devising some punchy additions to enlarge the scale of his act (Zouave soldiers, Japanese acrobats, comeuppance from the abrupt start of the film program onscreen), a reviewer of his show at New York’s Capital Theater was still skeptical, stat- ing that “Benny is still the suave and clever emcee working all through the show to keep it pieced together effectively. His suaveness, then, tends to slowness, which hardly helps a presentation in a ‘deluxer.’ The type of enter- tainment that goes is that which is served speedily and peppily.”31 Benny was at a career crossroads as he wandered among various venues and media forms, trying to find the most advantageous platform for his particular skills. Moreover, worsening economic conditions of the early 1930s made the search all the more nerve-wracking. In 1932, radio and advertising executives like NBC’s Bertha Brainard, scanning the horizon for talent that might best adapt to radio’s needs, con- sidered Jack Benny, although they were not initially very enthusiastic about him. Neither network brass nor sponsors’ agencies were certain what styles and types of performers would work on the radio – many preferred the loud brashness and quickness of other comics and the stentorian tones of tux- edoed announcers. NBC had actually approached literary humorist Irvin S. Cobb prior to contacting Benny, but Cobb’s salary demands had been too high. Executives probably noted the affinities Benny’s stage act had for aural presentation—Benny produced most of his humor through low-key language and smooth, superbly timed delivery of his lines. He was not a primarily physical or visual comedian, getting laughs through broad facial expressions, costume, or slapstick body movements. Benny engaged in quiet, intimate joking, confiding in the audience as if speaking to a small group, methods similar to “crooning” singers such as Bing Crosby who were becoming popular through radio appearances. On the other hand, Benny’s droll stare out at the stage audience, his hand-to-cheek silently communicat- ing his frustration and winning their sympathy, was lost on radio listeners StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 169 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 170 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR though it would reemerge successfully to embellish his comedy routines in the television era. Challenges of the Initial Canada Dry Program As Benny began the twice-weekly broadcasts of Canada Dry’s new musical comedy radio show, it seemed that not only he, but the sponsor, ad agency, and network were almost shockingly naïve about how much labor Benny’s role might entail. The orchestra and vocalist had large musical catalogs from which they could draw new tunes to perform, but if Benny was to do more than introduce the title of the next song, he was going to need fresh mate- rial for every episode. Apparently no provisions were in the original plans for the program to hire writers. The executives must have assumed Benny ad-libbed or wrote his own humorous asides. As a popular emcee, Benny had experience in creating short gags and conversations with vaudeville per- formers, but he was used to repeating similar patter for different audiences the whole week of an engagement, and then the next week, getting either new performers to work with or a new city to play in. No one involved with the Canada Dry Program had entirely thought through how a twice-weekly program with the same performers and the same audience might work. The first live episode demonstrated the promise and the drawback of the concept. In seven short monologues interspersed between the songs, Benny presented himself as a suave, urbane, and thoroughly Americanized fel- low who was witty and personable, a wise-cracker who was self-centered, but who self-deprecatingly understood that his attempts at boastful ego- tism would end in mild humiliation. Benny exchanged a little banter with orchestra leader George Olsen and singer Ethel Shutta as he introduced them, although the nervous awkwardness of the new endeavor was appar- ent in Benny’s doing most of the talking and their very brief responses to standard, cheap vaudeville jokes about the age of Olsen’s automobile. Benny worked from a script; he wanted a written structure to guide him, to make sure that he was organized and that the jokes could be carefully pored over and crafted into polished gems.32 He delivered his lines, though, in such an easy, nonchalant manner that listeners may have thought he was speaking off the cuff. Studies of Benny’s career usually point out the assertive way that, even in this first episode, he wove the middle-of-the-program advertis- ing messages into his monologues, entwining a playful (and fairly unusual) mocking tone toward the product in the same way he told self-deprecating StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 170 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 171 stories about himself.33 (The advertising agency may have had a hand in composing the first middle commercials, but the sponsor was so upset by their sarcastic tone that it’s reasonable to assume Benny may have written these himself.) Benny’s introductory monologue was probably drawn from when he played at the Palace, but with the added twist of a backhanded plugging of the sponsor’s product: Ladies and gentlemen, this is Jack Benny talking, and making my first appearance on the air professionally. By that I mean, I am finally getting paid, which will be a great relief to my creditors. I really don’t know why I am here. I’m supposed to be a sort of master ofceremonies and tell you all about the things that will happen, which would happen anyway. I must introduce the different artists, who could easily introduce themselves, and also talk about Canada Dry made to order by the glass, which is a waste of time, as you know all about it. You drink it, like it, and don’t want to hear about it. So ladies and gentlemen, a master of ceremonies is really a fellow who is unemployed and gets paid for it.34 In the second and third episodes of the Canada Dry Program, with a dash of desperation, Benny provided brief descriptions of his fellow radio per- formers that again drew on standard vaudeville insult-humor patter: George Olsen was penurious, Ethel Shutta lied about her age, the boys in the band were drunkards, and announcer Ed Thorgerson resembled a Hollywood playboy with slicked back hair and a thin mustache. (It looked as if “he’d swallowed all of Mickey Mouse but the tail,” Benny quipped.35) But the others were given few lines to speak. Benny appealed to his unseen listeners directly, asking if anybody was out there, and he repeatedly reintroduced himself. In the second week, he opened the program with, “Hello somebody. This is Jack Benny talking. There will be a slight pause while you say ‘what of it?’ After all, I know your feelings, folks, I used to listen in myself.” He closed with, “That was our last number of our fourth program on the 11th of May. Are you still conscious? Hmm?”36 Billboard’s review of the new program noted that Benny’s nonchalant style of humor and delivery was different from what other comics were offering on air. “A taste for his style has to be acquired,” cautioned the reviewer, who also noticed the reliance on old vaudeville patter—“On this particular program he rang in some of his old material, but no doubt new to radio fans.”37 StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 171 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 172 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR Years later, Jack Benny confessed his panic: “in vaudeville you had one show and that was it. You changed it whenever you felt like it. And in this, when you realized that every week you needed a new show, this got a little bit frightening.”38 In another interview, he recalled, “I didn’t have any idea how important it was to have good material, and how hard it was to get. The first show was a cinch—I used about half of all the gags I knew. The second show consumed all the rest, and I faced the third absolutely dry.”39 Established performers appearing on the airwaves similarly expressed terror at the speed with which live broadcasts to huge audiences consumed a career’s worth of performances in just a few hours. “The scourge of the amusement field is radio,” warned Variety. “Radio is devouring too much music, eating up the stage too cannibalistically and burning out all talent too fast, so that it may undo itself about as rapidly as it made itself promi- nent in its relation to the masses.”40 Ed Wynn complained that “the gags used in four half-hour programs would provide enough material for a full-length Broadway play.”41 While Variety acknowledged that radio had made nation- ally known stars of niche performers like Wynn and Jack Pearl as well as previous unknowns like Freeman Gosden and Charles Correll (creators of Amos ’n’ Andy), it cautioned: Radio devours everything so fast that it points to the ultimate that the pace can’t last. The very biggest on the ether today soon become boresome simply because it’s not showmanly to dish up a new act 52 times a year. Comics [who] used to be able to test out their new routines in smaller towns like Plainfield and Union Hill, now can kill their careers with a bad routine in front of 20 to 50 million listeners in one night.42 Performers and program producers struggled to adapt old business models to this new mode of communication. The radio networks had consolidated the complex programming system of vaudeville into just a few broadcast outlets that demanded seriality and liveness for mass nationwide audiences. These pressures precluded shows from being able to use previously recorded performances or reruns, options which might have made the search for fresh material, the pressure to perform at peak ability, and the chase for high ratings less fearsome. During his years in vaudeville, Benny had regularly enhanced his routine by purchasing jokes and routines from gag writers such as Al Boasberg, StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 172 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 173 Dave Freedman, and Harry Conn.43 He turned to them now.44 In the 1920s, Burns and Allen had paid Boasberg a continuous 10 percent of their $1,750 weekly vaudeville salary in exchange for his creation of individual routines, such as “Lamb Chops,” that they performed for years. The duo asked him to write material for their weekly radio broadcasts on the Robert Burns Cigar Program, but Boasberg balked at how much more work was involved in creating the seven-to-eight minutes of new material they required each week for only 10 percent of their $1,000 radio salary. Boasberg quit and moved to Hollywood to take film-writing jobs.45 Burns and Allen and their radio producers soon assembled a staff of five writers to churn out all the nec- essary material. Dave Freedman devised an alternate method to address radio comics’ endless need for material (Eddie Cantor was one of his major clients). Freedman hired a staff of young assistants who combed through every source of humor in the library—joke books, magazine articles, and nineteenth-century literature—to cull every possible jest, quip, and comic exchange. They organized these jokes into vast files on every conceivable topic that Freedman could then dip into, rearrange a few particulars, and assemble into scripts that he churned out for a half-dozen different radio comedy shows each week.46 By the end of the second week, Benny realized his show was heading toward disaster, and he sought out Harry Conn, a tap-dancing former vaudevillian who had turned to fulltime writing, penning routines for dozens of comedians and for Mae West’s Broadway shows in the 1920s.47 In the spring of 1932, Conn was working on the Burns and Allen staff. When Benny decided to rely solely on Conn and his material, Benny had to pay Conn’s salary out of his own pocket. The two quickly became partners, working closely together week in and out to create, edit, and perfect the dialogue. To Conn’s chagrin, the radio network would not allow writers to receive on-air credit, however, so Benny always remained the focus of public and critical acclaim.48 Benny was as financially generous with Conn as he was dependent on him, paying Conn one of the highest salaries earned by radio writers.49 By the end of the third week on the air, with Conn on board, Canada Dry Program scripts started to become more adventurous. George Olsen now was given more straight lines as he and Benny engaged in conversa- tion. Everyone else in the studio—from orchestra members to Conn and to Benny’s personal assistant Harry Baldwin—was pulled to the mike to StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 173 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 174 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR voice fictional guests in brief one-time appearances. Benny and Conn began experimenting with a richer fictional world for the program, creat- ing sketch routines that briefly moved away from the microphone. On May 23, 1932, they finessed the problem of segueing by endowing announcer Ed Thorgerson with a magical ability to tune an on-air radio into conversa- tion made by the characters at a soda fountain located inthe building’s lobby. The show staff created sound effects of glasses clinking and ginger ale fizzing. Jack and Ethel Shutta bantered with a soda jerk portrayed by orchestra member Fran Frey. The scene may have lasted only two minutes, but when Benny seemed to return to the studio after the next song, he jok- ingly assumed that he had to explain to the audience what they had done: “Well folks, this is Jack Benny back at the studio. Well, to tell you the truth, we never even left here. Olsen’s bass drum was the counter. And the fizz you heard was one of the boys sneezing.”50 Subsequent episodes each contained a three-to-five-minute sketch occurring in a fictional place away from the immediacy of the studio space. Some involved Jack traveling to a special event and reporting on it (essentially performing a monologue). In May 30 there was a foot race between an animated glass of Canada Dry and several condiment bottles. Benny called the action like a horse race, and at the end he interviewed the winning glass of ginger ale. (The bottle was played by Jack in a fal- setto voice.) In another bit, Jack attended the Dempsey-Sharkey prizefight at Madison Square Garden and parodied radio sports coverage, giving play-by-play action. On other fanciful skits, Jack and George Olsen were arrested for speeding and broadcast the program from jail, and, on July 6, the cast visited the zoo and gathered testimonials from the animals about how much they enjoyed drinking Canada Dry. Meanwhile, Jack continued to rib George Olsen for being a spendthrift. Benny and Conn strove to avoid a rigid formula, but rather to devise a revolving mixture of comic monologues, repartee, pun tossing, and fictional adventures. They made humorous topical references to public figures, they made wickedly sharp puns and jokes at the expense of the sponsor’s product, and they parodied write-in contests and other promotional gimmicks that were then popular on other radio programs. Some of their experimental ideas were solidly successful; others were problematic. Some ideas (such as satirizing presi- dential candidates Roosevelt and Hoover) ended after a few attempts, per- haps at the behest of their sponsor. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 174 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 175 Benny and Conn also experimented in those first months on the radio in order to add at least one additional continuing character to the show, the first person who would not also have an official function on the radio program as announcer, musician, or singer. On May 25, Benny interviewed the supposed janitor of the building, played by band member Bobby Moore, who responded to questions only in gurgles of baby talk. On June 1, the janitor briefly returned, speaking in a heavy German accent. This time the part was probably played by Harry Conn. On June 15, Conn portrayed an Italian-American tough guy attending the Dempsey-Sharkey boxing match. On July 13, Jack talked to a group of Scottish gentlemen who would be judging the latest Canada Dry con- test; all the Scots were played by Conn (including a Scottish terrier who simply woofed). Ethnic characters were a staple in Conn’s bag of com- edy writing tricks, which reappeared in scripts throughout his tenure with the Benny show. Although the burlesquing of immigrants’ struggles with the English language was widespread in nineteenth-century litera- ture and entertainment, and has remained a regular source of insensi- tive humor up to the present day, there was increasing debate in radio (and in film) about whether the humor of country bumpkins and heav- ily accented greenhorn immigrants was a relic of creaky old vaudeville humor that did not mesh with more modern sophisticated comedy of the type that Benny, the “Broadway Romeo,” had been creating.51 It’s prob- able that Conn saw the ethnic-accented caricature of American voices to be a bit of verbal slapstick or unexpected aural comedy costuming for the airwaves. Despite Conn’s favoring of ethnic voices, Benny used bit-part actors, dialect specialists, to portray ethnic characters on the show.52 On air, Benny began to talk about hiring an assistant to handle all the mail the program was receiving in response to the outrageous Canada Dry contests he had been devising. This search continued over the next month, as Benny acquired first an inefficient male secretary, then an incompetent female secretary named Garbo.53 A young woman named Mary Livingstone, ostensibly a besotted fan of Benny from the small town of Plainfield, New Jersey, wandered on to the program on July 27. She was played by Sadye Marks Benny, Jack’s real-life spouse, a talented nonprofessional whom he would incorporate occasionally into stage routines and film shorts in simi- lar supporting roles as a flirtatious and flip but none-too-bright young female companion. Several episodes later, Mary assumed the role of Jack’s StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 175 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 176 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR lackadaisical part time secretary on the radio show. Jack (who six weeks earlier had joked about a demanding girlfriend, Molly) was immediately attracted to her. Audience reaction was favorable, and Mary Livingstone began to appear regularly on the Canada Dry Program.54 Along with new characters came questions of narrative development. How much serialization and continuing plot did Benny and Conn want to have on their show in the interstitial spots sandwiched between the musical numbers? Amos ’n’ Andy had a 15-minute comic-melodramatic plot that played out five nights per week. Eddie Cantor had experimented with a fictional narrative on his show (with mixed results, a few critics complaining about too much plot). Fred Allen placed his character into a constantly changing series of situations—running a night court, operat- ing a department store—which introduced new characters every episode. Ed Wynn parodied opera librettos, a different one each time.55 Conn and Benny liked the mixture of different show formats: a situation or sketch one week, a parody of a film or standing around the microphone another. Still, the pair toyed with the idea of developing a continuing romantic comedy subplot. Episodes in September and October 1932 played out Jack and Mary’s flirtations and comic misunderstandings, and climaxed with a scene of them espousing their love for one another. Benny and Conn had written themselves into a corner. Would the show now be dominated by a love story? Where would the comic conflicts arise? They quickly did an about-face with the scripts and decided to move in another direction, backing away from romantic tensions. Mary returned to flirting with the band mates and announcer, performing ineptly as a secretary, making silly comments that pegged her as a Dumb Dora character, and ribbing Jack’s small foibles. After several months of twice-a-week programs, Benny and Conn began to garner critical notice for both the comic advertising and comedy situations. Variety reported in August, “Jack Benny was in good form on last week’s program, having evolved sundry effective gags for plugging Canada Dry. In line with the recent trend toward a humorous plug for the sponsor, he is sugar-coating and making palatable what is usually a boresome interlude in the best of programs.”56 In October, Variety commented, “Jack Benny is improving on his Canada Dry humor. Benny has built up a unique style of comedy, especially with those puns which, however, are not injudiciously primed for strong returns.”57 StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 176 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/termsBecoming Benny 177 Interfering Sponsors Just when Benny and Conn thought they had achieved a solid, successful mixture of comedy and music, with increasingly complex characters, situ- ations, and sketch parody elements (poking fun at popular films, contests, sports coverage, and interview programs), their all-powerful sponsor tossed several unanticipated monkey wrenches into to the works. In November 1932, Canada Dry declared its displeasure with many aspects of the pro- gram, despite such critical praise as the observation that Benny’s “air appear- ance [has] brought forward much of the present style of radio humor.”58 The sponsor peremptorily changed networks to CBS to gain a larger and more advantageous network of participating stations. But this meant losing Olsen, Shutta, and the announcer, who were contractually obligated to NBC. The sponsor also claimed that the comic elements were insufficient and hired an additional writer-performer, Sid Silvers, to take the show in a new direction. Benny and Conn suddenly had to start over from scratch—teaching a new bandleader, singer, and announcer how to become comedians, and fighting off the intrusions of Silvers, who sought to turn the show into the completely fictional, continuing story of a befuddled Broadway producer and his smart- aleck assistant, played by Silvers. Benny, Conn, and Livingstone stormed into the ad agency’s headquarters and threatened to quit if Silvers was not removed and they did not regain full control of the program’s production. While Canada Dry relented and let Silvers go, the sponsor had had enough excitement, and it cancelled the show in January 1933. Fortunately for Benny, it did not take him long to find a new radio spon- sor. Automobile manufacturer Chevrolet was tired of the shenanigans of its temperamental singing star Al Jolson, and when Jolson quit, the company picked up Benny. The shift brought several significant changes to the pro- gram, as Benny was now the program’s acknowledged main focus: the sup- porting characters (called stooges) interacted with Benny, while he got most of the punch lines. Now the show was broadcast only one evening per week (NBC on Friday 10:00–10:30 p.m.) and was billed as a comedy program that contained music. For the third time, Benny and Conn had to begin to train a new cast.59 Mary assumed a much more prominent role on the program as Jack’s companion, the only female character on the show, and the program’s main stooge. Conn expanded Mary’s role by having her read letters from her Mama back on the farm in Plainfield. Mary also composed and recited StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 177 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 178 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR dreadful poetry. A decent vocalist, Mary also occasionally performed songs with the orchestra. She flirted with band members and the announcer, and heckled Benny more than ever before. Critics continued to commend Benny for creating a different kind of radio comedy program. The Ottawa Citizen’s reviewer complimented Benny for the high-quality humor he created with his cast of characters—“Jack has the knack of making everyone on his program real and human, instead of just a lot of radio voices.”60 That summer, when Chevrolet put the radio show on hiatus (retreating from national advertising when their revenues lagged so badly), Benny and Mary Livingstone returned to the stage in a personal appearance tour, and vaudeville critics remarked on Benny’s new level of radio-fueled stardom: “[His] popularity was never so frankly confessed by the public prior to his radio career. What the air did for Benny was to make him a household character,” a Chicago reviewer noted.61 Benny’s radio challenges were far from over, however, for when his radio program returned to the air in October 1933, it was broadcast at yet another new time slot (Sunday evenings, 10:00 p.m.). Again he and Conn had to break in a new cast. Luckily for them, new announcer Alois Havrilla and tenor Frank Parker quickly assimilated themselves into Conn’s character- building dialogue and skits. Then a new chief executive took over the reins at sponsor Chevrolet and pronounced that he would rather have his com- pany’s program present more serious orchestral music than comedy. Despite putting on a program that was continuing to climb to the top of the ratings polls, Benny once again found himself summarily, and humiliatingly, fired. Some sponsors and ad agencies had reservations about picking up a so- called “used” comedian, whose selling prospects might be sullied because his name had already been associated with two other advertised products. And it was already mid-season, when most major sponsors were already tied to their current programs. Nevertheless, Benny was soon back on the NBC airwaves with a stop-gap sponsor—General Tire (who couldn’t afford to pay for his program more than a few months)—and yet another new broadcast slot, Friday evenings from 10:30 to 11:00 p.m. In this uncertain time, Benny was especially frustrated that sponsor upheavals caused such problems for the success of the comedy narrative he and Conn were trying to build. The revolving door of bandleaders, singers, and announcers wreaked havoc with the show creators’ attempts StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 178 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 179 to maintain complex, interesting supporting characters and their comic situations. Up to this point, the sponsor and ad agency selected all the performers, who might also be under restrictive contractual obligations to the NBC network. Benny became determined to assume more of the responsibilities of program producer (what we today would call a show- runner) to control the personnel upheavals by making more of his own cast selections, hiring the performers himself, and presenting his pro- gram as a complete package for the sponsor to fund. Benny’s first hiring of a permanent cast member was the new announcer Don Wilson (the tenth announcer in two years on the air), who joined the program in April 1934. Their relationship, sealed by a personal contract with Benny that allowed Wilson to announce for other programs but only perform com- edy on Benny’s, was very productive.62 Conn made Wilson an intelligent (and originally pugnacious) opponent who critiqued Jack’s vanity, and Wilson’s warm, friendly midwestern voice soon made him one of the top salesmen in radio. Wilson’s character became jollier as jokes about his girth abounded. Yet another obstacle for the show’s narrative to overcome arose when Benny added the logistical challenge of temporarily relocat- ing the weekly live broadcasts of his radio show to the West Coast several times a year while he was shooting a film in Hollywood. Oftentimes the East Coast cast members could not accompany him. He would then have to work with substitute performers, creating extra challenges to Conn’s creative abilities. Having to start over again with temporary players in the summer of 1934 led Conn to fall back on parodies of murder myster- ies, Kentucky hill feuds, and “ten-twent-thirt” melodramas in which Jack, Mary, and Don did most of the gagging. These repetitive send-ups of the same basic plot were another twist on situation comedy patterns. These easier scripts allowed Conn and Benny to spend more time working on films (Benny paid Conn to embellish his film dialogue), and they gave the cast members opportunities to joke about each other’s personalities. While these scripts lacked the energy and inventiveness of the program’s more elaborately plotted film parodies and sketches about group adven- tures that Conn produced when they returned to New York, Benny and Conn decided to continue to alternatesituation comedy with intimate joking around the microphone and the more elaborate types of comic elements. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 179 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 180 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR Benny’s Character Becomes More Fallible By spring 1934, despite the continuing turmoil of changing casts and broadcast times, and rancorous relationships with sponsors, the humorous content of the Benny show remained rich; the show’s narrative formula and characterizations were evolving into the forms Benny would rely on for the rest of his career. Harry Conn concentrated even further on developing the personas of the cast’s other performers as quirky, individual characters. Don Bestor the bandleader was a highbrow; Frank Parker the tenor was a sophis- ticated young smart aleck; Mary was boisterous but not very bright. Jack was making fewer of the jokes, and more often it was the stooges who got the laugh lines by ribbing Benny. More than ever, Benny became the poor Shmo, the unlucky fellow to whom humiliating things always seemed to happen.63 On the May 11, 1934 show, to make a peace offering after they had had an argument at the show’s opening, Don Wilson invited Jack out to his mother’s home in the Bronx for the weekend. Jack suffered numerous misadventures on their journey, getting robbed three times and gladly handing over his money in each instance. The thief even awarded Jack a card identifying him as a frequent customer. When the pair finally arrived at the Wilson home, there was no food, no spare bed, and no luck for the hapless guest. Benny’s character began to shift further from being just the likeable, self- deprecating emcee of the program to develop more personality quirks and flaws (cheapness, boastfulness, vanity, infamous for his poor violin-playing skills, his paucity of hair, and his lack of masculinity). The list steadily grew longer as the Jack character lost most of that assured Broadway Romeo sua- vity he had demonstrated during his vaudeville career and was now depicted as inept at interacting with the opposite sex. His patriarchal authority as star of the show was more frequently challenged by his mocking radio employees. While standard joke book-style insults about cheapness and stupidity were still bandied about by the entire cast, the jabs were refur- bished so that charges were now often made by others, egged on by Mary, and aimed at Benny. A significant turning point for the Benny character occurred in a skit about Jack’s Hollywood screen test, on the June 8, 1934, program. Benny had taken his radio cast out to California, as he was appearing in a film produced by Edward Small at the RKO studios, Transatlantic Merry Go Round (Benjamin Stoloff, 1934), which involves mobsters’ intrigues and murder on an ocean StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 180 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 181 liner. As Benny had done since the beginning of his radio show, he entwined references to his work in other media forms and personal details of his life, blurring the lines between the fictional and real Jack Benny personas. Conn and Benny drew on his self-deprecating traits and pushed them further, now enacting professional incompetence. Conn created a skit in which Jack was at the film studio, where he has been compelled to submit to a screen test to secure the role of romantic leading man. As scripted, Mr. Kane, the direc- tor, was trying to complete the test, and a nervous Benny was making that difficult: Kane: Now for the first line, say “Ah Christina, your royal highness, thou are ravishing this evening. Would’st that thou favor me with thy presence at lun- cheon forthwith!” Jack: I’ve been waiting for a Jimmy Cagney part like this. [Jack’s first stumbling attempt to read his line is, “Oh, Christina. . . . er . . . er . . . ah Christina . . . er . . . er . . . can you cash a check?”] Kane: Now Mr. Benny, I think we better rehearse this first. . . . you walk up to Miss Hill and say “Christina, I love you.” Jack: I see, OK [SFX heavy clomp of footsteps] Kane: Not so heavy on the walk! [Don Wilson (the announcer) interjects a reference to sponsor General Tire] Don: Jack, I think he means the Silent Safety Tread! Jack: You would, Don . . . Kane: Yes, that’s it. Now come on, read your line. Jack: All right . . . [very flatly]. “Christina, I love you.” Kane: How do you expect her to believe that? Come on, put some passion into it. . . . try it again Jack: Christina, I love you!!!! [pants] . . . How’s that, Mary? Mary: I still like Robert Montgomery. Kane: Aw, a little more fire now. . . . Ask Christina for her hand in marriage. Jack: Will you marry me? Beverly Hill: I should say not! Jack: Now what do I do? Kane: Register surprise! Jack: Why Christina, I’m surprised at you! Beverly Hill: I never want to see you again! Kane: Register grief! StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 181 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 182 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR Jack: Gee whiz, gee whiz . . . Kane: For heaven’s sake, is that grief? Jack: That’s grief where I come from Kane: Where do you come from? Jack: Waukegan Kane: That IS grief! Jack: Oh yeah? Cut! Kane: Wait a minute, that’s my line . . . cut!64 The scene devolved into further humiliation for Jack as the director called Don Wilson over to demonstrate appropriately virile histrionic skills. Wilson passionately extolled the virtues of General’s blowout-proof tires to the hero- ine, while Jack fumed on the sidelines. Despite the ever-rising ratings and critical acclaim that his radio program was attaining, Benny continued to be bedeviled by frustrating developments that he could not control. After he guided The General Tire Show through the summer of 1934, in September, the sponsor informed Benny that their finances were so poor that they were unable to continue funding the show. Executives made an agreement to have the show’s sponsorship shared with another struggling consumer product manufacturer, Jell-O gelatin, a forty- year-old product with a declining market share. For what must have seemed the umpteenth time, Benny and Conn had to endure not only cast upheavals, but the move in October 1934 to NBC’s graveyard broadcast hour of Sunday evenings at 7:00 p.m., a slot previously dominated by programs of somber music and hymns.65 Money was so tight that Benny and Livingstone even agreed to work without pay until sales revenue rose enough to cover the show’s production expenses. After several worrisome months, however, the stars finally aligned for Benny. Jell-O sales rose and continued climbing, assisted by both the inviting, warm commercials Wilson broadcast for the dessert product and the delightful punning references to the product that Benny and Conn sprinkled throughout the program. Syndicated columnist O. O. McIntyre lauded the show: “Benny’s humor has the dry crackle of sun-burned twigs. Never explosive, he bungles along, firing the arrows of contempt at himself. He brought to the business of being a comic a combined restraint, a suavity that was something entirely different, and it clicked.”66 Radio Guide agreed, noting: “Comedian Benny learned long ago that StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 182 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 183 the way to make people laugh without straining is to create a comical situation—not to redress old jokes in party clothes and rely on studio applause to get them over. Jack also learned that the public loves to see the headman made the fall guy.”67 Bythe fall of 1935, even though the program had finally obtained the financial and organizational security to seal its creative success, fissures began to widen between creative collaborators Benny and Conn. A resent- ful Harry Conn saw Jack Benny reap the spotlight of stardom, while Conn labored every week in obscurity (albeit well-paid obscurity). Conn began making increasing salary demands on Benny and pressured him to further promote Conn’s authorship, and he was quoted in interviews dismissing Benny’s editorial contributions and belittling the degree to which actors cre- ated comedy.68 New York Times radio critic Orrin Dunlap took Benny’s side. “It is no easy task for the gag men to keep these clowns on the track that fits their personality; to feed lines that win sympathetic reaction,” Dunlap argued. “Radio humor is not all a matter of material. The delivery counts. Every comedian can take the same joke and make it sound different to the average ear. . . . [E]ach comedian ‘pitches’ differently in curving humor over the home plates for a strike.”69 Benny devoted innumerable hours to the production of his radio show each week, polishing Conn’s scripted dialogue and working closely with his cast to hone the timing of the repartee. Distressing to Benny, sponsor, and reviewers alike, the Jell-O Program scripts in late 1935 began to lose their luster. The dialogue increasingly floundered: Dumb Dora jokes abounded from both Mary and tenor Kenny Baker; obvious, weak laughs substituted for previously sharp wit. Perhaps Conn had run out of creative ideas, or his frustrations boiled over into sub-par writing. The partnership broke irrevo- cably when Conn deserted Benny midweek in March 1936, while they were performing in Baltimore in the middle of an East Coast tour. Benny quickly rallied assistance from fellow radio comics and his advertising agency (now Young and Rubicam), and after a few shaky weeks, he emerged with a new duo of young scripters (Ed Morrow and Bill Beloin). Despite Harry Conn’s ambitious plans to become a headlined radio writer-performer, he quickly fell into embittered obscurity, while Benny’s radio program, enhanced by fresh ideas, became ever more inventive and popular. Building on the strong foundation that Conn had laid, Morrow, Beloin, and Benny added embellish- ments such as scripting their half of the feud with Fred Allen, shifting Mary’s StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 183 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 184 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR persona to become much more bitingly sharp, and—especially—introducing Rochester the valet (played by Eddie Anderson), who became a perfect foil for Benny’s escalating failings. Conclusion This brief case study has traced the evolution of Jack Benny’s comedy prac- tices over one portion of his long career, as he moved across entertainment systems from vaudeville to radio in the early 1930s. The core of his comic identity endured—his self-deprecating humor—as well as aspects that had set him as well as other proto stand-up comedians apart from their baggy- pantsed, knock about vaudeville forbears: his mild-mannered, urban and modern midwestern, nonethnic persona, and his carefully crafted and superbly timed jokes and commentary. Other facets of his comic identity also shifted and changed in reaction to the new environments in which he found himself. At every stage in his career, Benny’s comic practices were shaped by struc- tural aspects of the entertainment system in which he worked. Vaudeville was organized as a collection of fifteen- to twenty-minute nuggets of enter- tainment, each act polished, perfected, and constantly moved around the nation in controlled circuits to perform before different urban and large town audiences every night. Benny had forged a successful place in that system, working within the censorship restrictions of the circuit and theater manag- ers who hired him. As manager of his own routine, Benny devised his own performance style, wrote or shopped for comic dialogue, and made his own decisions in the choice of performing assistants or partners. Monologues addressed directly to vaudeville audiences seemed to Benny the best way to deliver his comedy. A little later, he adapted well to the added role of master of ceremonies, layering onto his humorous base the role of a congenial host who used introductions to draw disparate acts more closely together into an intertwined two-hour performance for vaudeville audiences. Benny’s bumpy entrance into commercially sponsored primetime net- work radio broadcasting, however, provides one example of the ways in which the entertainer’s performing identity and the shape of comedy could be impacted by structural factors of a different entertainment system. Benny did not have a problem performing within the constraints and stresses of radio’s liveness, unlike some other performers who previously had only StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 184 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 185 worked in recorded media (such as motion pictures or publications). The commercial network radio system did, however, add new wrinkles to the construction of its entertainment, from the sponsor’s desire to intersperse advertising messages into the show and the economic efficiency of continu- ally working with the same small group of performers, to interference by the many executives who sought to meddle in Benny’s attempt to write, per- form, cast, and manage his own program. Troublesome to Benny and other performers from vaudeville, the radio system reconfigured its audience into one mass group of listeners who supposedly expected to hear new material in every iteration of a program. This system demanded constant variety of content along with the identifiable similarity of material being produced by recognizable stars or performers whose talent could be associated with posi- tive qualities of the consumer product being advertised. The relentless need for new material for his radio performances impacted the ways in which Benny shaped his comedy. He became very dependent on one writer, Harry Conn, to provide the new material each week, requiring Benny to labor that much harder to edit the scripts and polish the lines to represent his own comic point of view. Other radio comedians were utilizing strings of individual jokes or continuing with one-man-show monologues and using ever changing, poorly paid staffs of writers. Individual jokes were easy prey for other performers, desperate for funny material, to plagiarize. Benny and Conn found that incorporating dialogue exchanges into their show added more variety to the single-performer model. Better yet, mold- ing individual characters for the other performers around the microphone enabled Conn to devise more humor from the quirkiness of those disparate personalities, the conflicts and misunderstandings between them, and the humor that arose from putting those characters into comic situations. The development of characters and situations went hand in hand for Benny and Conn as they created the show from week to week in those early months of the radio program. Benny’s case study also holds interest for what elements he and Harry Conn chose not to incorporate into their program in their three-and-a-half years together—such as their rejection of more continuously plotted nar- ratives when they turned away from the Jack-Mary romance or rejected Sid Silvers’s plan for the running story of a harassed Broadway producer. The use of satirical political humor was also of brief duration in 1932. The domestic side of Benny’s situation comedy would really blossom only StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 185 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloadedfrom 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 186 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR when Eddie Anderson was brought aboard in 1938. Zany comedy, or humor of the absurd, cropped up in the program more prominently in the post- World War II period, when Mel Blanc and the Sportsmen Quartet created characters— violin teachers, train announcers, out-of-control jingle singers— who frustrated Benny to the point of yelling. Benny and Conn’s perfection of the Fall Guy character (and the stooges’ incessant insults and jokes about the character) was a very important aspect of the show’s ongoing success, but even it would also have to continue to change to maintain audience interest. Benny and his writers had to keep increasing the cheapness of Jack’s stingy ways over the years, making his penury more hyperbolic in order to shock audiences. Thus Jack could get held up by a robber three times in 1934 and shrug it off, but by the late 1940s a robbery would become Jack’s famous “Your Money or Your Life” debacle. In addition, Jack’s character would become increasingly vain, from coyly declining to reveal his age, to the eventual determination to remain thirty- nine. With repetition and small incremental increases, Mary, Rochester, Phil, Professor LeBlanc, and other stooges could turn their insults of Jack into comic shorthand, dressing the same complaints in updated costumes over the years. I certainly don’t mean to imply that Benny and Conn invented situation comedy, as of course they drew on well-known and long-standing models of situational, domestic, and serialized humor in literary storytelling, comic strips, and other areas of media and popular culture. My primary inter- est here is to chart how one particular entertainer changed over time and adopted alternative comic forms, and to trace the reasons that he was com- pelled to use them. Even as Benny continued broadcasting his half-hour pro- gram for nearly thirty more years on radio and television, he never allowed his show to become exclusively framed as a situation comedy. Benny always claimed that he preferred to continually mix program formats, incorporating workplace sitcom one week, parodies of popular films another, with guest stars who appeared as real celebrities to humiliate Jack, performances by singers or musicians, domestic sitcom at Benny’s home, or intimate banter around the microphone. Benny maintained that he wanted to keep his audi- ence guessing what form the next episode might take.70 When he entered television in 1950, Benny even reincorporated the use of vaudeville style monologues and emcee introductory patter into some episodes. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 186 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 187 As media historian Michele Hilmes has noted, radio entertainers such as Jack Benny were fortunate in the 1930s to have had the opportunities of time and multiple chances with sponsors in which to develop their radio personas as well as their programs’ character and situation comedy forms.71 Broadcasting became ever more expensive with the move to television in the late 1940s, and it increasingly became a big business with the prime- time pressure of expensive productions and expensive airtime. Latter–day program producers would not have the relative luxury of time that Benny experienced in the seasons during which he evolved his particular comic style, was able to experiment and make mistakes, and found and built a loyal audience of fans. Only now, in the post network era of media convergence— when technology has allowed production costs to plummet and the Internet is creating new platforms, new spaces, and new niche audiences for pro- gramming—do there exist again expanded opportunities in which comics, performers, writers, directors, and producers can experiment with innova- tive varieties of programming. notes 1. Larry Wolters, “Olsen Recalls First Benny Show on Anniversary; Idea of Kidding Sponsor was George’s,” Chicago Tribune, December 1, 1935, S6; “With Canada’s Mounted” Variety, January 19, 1932, 58. 2. “Inside Stuff—Radio,” Variety, June 7, 1932, 49; “Canadians Hear New Program by Canada Dry Ginger Ale,” Montreal Guardian, May 5, 1932, 2. 3. Jack Benny Program, May 2, 1932; Advertisement, Variety, October 1, 1932, 16. 4. This was not Benny’s first radio performance. He had appeared several times on local and regional broadcasts connected with his film and stage appearances between 1929 and 1931, and he was a guest on Ed Sullivan’s gossipy interview program in spring 1932. However, he had not been on a major coast-to-coast radio variety program before. 5. “Radio’s Script Act Cycle,” Variety, May 10, 1932, 55; Ben Bodec, “Radio in ’32,” Variety, January 3, 1933, 59. On radio in the early 1930s, see Michele Hilmes, Radio Voices: American Broadcasting 1922–1952 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997); Susan J. Douglas, Listening In: Radio and the American Imagination (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004). 6. Kathryn Fuller-Seeley, “Dish Night at the Movies: Exhibitors and Female Audiences during the Great Depression,” in The American Film History Reader, ed. Jon Lewis and Eric Smoodin (London: Routledge, 2014), 246–75. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 187 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 188 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR 7. Brett Mills, Television Sitcom (London: British Film Institute, 2005); Horace Newcomb, Television: The Critical View (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000). 8. “Annual Radio Poll,” New York World-Telegram (February 1933), in “Benny Scrapbook 1933,” box 116, collection 8922, Jack Benny Papers, American Heritage Center, University of Wyoming; Lawrence E. Mintz, “Standup Comedy as Social and Cultural Mediation,” American Quarterly 37, no. 1 (1985): 71–80. 9. Holly A. Pearse, “As Goyish as Lime Jell-O? Jack Benny and the American Construction of Jewishness,” Jewish Cultural Studies (2008): 272–90. 10. Robert W. Snyder, The Voice of the City: Vaudeville and Popular Culture in New York (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989). 11. Robert J. Landry, “For Benny It Was Big Time or Nothing; He Wasn’t for Coalminers,” Variety, April 30, 1940, 24, 45. 12. Landry, “For Benny It Was Big Time or Nothing,” 45. On the history of vaudeville, see Trav S.D., No Applause—Just Throw Money: The Book That Made Vaudeville Famous (New York: Faber and Faber, 2006); Arthur Frank Wertheim, Vaudeville Wars: How Keith- Albee and Orpheum Circuits Controlled the Big-Time and Its Performers (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009); Henry Jenkins, What Made Pistachio Nuts? Early Sound Comedy and the Vaudeville Aesthetic (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992). 13. “Majestic, Chicago,” Billboard, September 27, 1920, 9; “Keith’s, Cincinnati,” Billboard, October 1, 1921, 11; “Orpheum, St. Louis,” Billboard, October 31, 1925, 15; “Palace, Chicago,” Billboard, November 15, 1924, 14. 14. “Palace, Chicago,” Billboard, November 15, 1924, 14. 15. “Palace, New York,” Billboard, April 18, 1925, 14. Variety’s review of Jack Benny’s per- formance at the Palace in 1927 termed him “the gentlemanly kibitzer.” Another review specifically noted that he used no Yiddish in his act; see “Palace, New York,” Variety, September 21, 1927, 26. 16. Abel Green, “The Big Band Cavalcade: A Study in Changing Sounds and Economics,” Variety January 3, 1968, 151. 17. Maurice Zolotow, “The Fiddler from Waukegan,” Cosmopolitan, October 1947, 49–51, 137–38, 141–46; 142. 18. “Palace, New York,” Variety, April 7, 1926, 26. 19. “Review of Vitaphone No. 2997,” Variety, August 29, 1928, 15. The skit was such a Benny favorite that he reused it for years, paired either with femaleor male stooges, on his early radio shows and during personal appearance tours. 20. “Frank Fay,” Los Angeles Times, September 27, 1961, 1. 21. Frank Cullen, Florence Hackman, and Donald McNeilly, Vaudeville Old and New: An Encyclopedia of Variety Performances in America, vol. 1 (New York: Psychology Press, 2004), 370–71. 22. Robert Landry, “Frank Fay, One of Real Vaude Greats, Dies at 63,” Variety, September 27, 1961, 2, 78. One film that showcases Fay as the suave MC is Warner Brothers’ early talkie The Show of Shows (John G. Adolfi, 1929). StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 188 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 189 23. Maurice Zolotow, “Frank Fay: Mystical Ex-Vaudevillian Teams with Invisible Rabbit to Make a Big Theatrical Comeback,” Life, January 8, 1945, 55, 58, 60, 63. 24. Landry, “Frank Fay,” 2, 78; Cullen, Vaudeville Old and New, 369; Trav S.D., No Applause, 184. 25. Cullen, Vaudeville Old and New, 21; Anthony Slide, Encyclopedia of Vaudeville (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2012), 169. 26. Zolotow, “Fiddler from Waukegan,” 142. 27. “Palace, New York,” Variety, May 2, 1931, 26. 28. “Palace, New York,” Variety, January 8, 1930, 103. 29. “New Palace, Chicago,” Variety, December 7, 1929, 18. 30. “Palace, New York,” Variety, November 24, 1928, 17. Reviewers of the show at Los Angeles’s Orpheum Theater in 1928 noted, “Jack Benny in his second week as mas- ter of ceremonies scored heavily as usual. His girl assistant, [Jack’s new wife Sadye] although from appearance inexperienced, aided the humorous atmosphere consider- ably.” “Orpheum,” Variety, March 17, 1928, 17. 31. “Capitol Theater,” Billboard, September 1932, 11; “Film House Reviews, Variety, February 11, 1931, 52. 32. Canada Dry Ginger Ale Program, May 2, 1932, script, Radio Scripts, box 1, file 1, collection 134, Jack Benny Papers, University of California at Los Angeles Library. 33. Other discussions of Benny’s radio career are found in Hilmes, Radio Voices; Arthur Frank Wertheim, Radio Comedy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979); Jack Benny, Sunday Nights at Seven: The Jack Benny Story (New York: GK Hall, 1991); Ellen O-Neill, Jack Benny: The Radio and Television Work (New York: Harper and Row, 1991). 34. Canada Dry Program Script, May 2, 1932, Benny Papers, UCLA. 35. “Were You Listening Last Night,” Pittsburgh Press, May 10, 1932, 11. 36. Canada Dry Program Script, May 11, 1932, Benny Papers, UCLA. 37. “Canada Dry Program,” Billboard, May 14, 1932, 17. 38. “Stars Shine Best When Polished,” Broadcasting and Television, October 1956, 118–26; 122. 39. Jerome Beatty, “Unhappy Fiddler,” American Magazine (December 1944), 28–29, 142–44. 40. “Radio Its Own Menace,” Variety, February 21, 1933, 59. 41. Jerald Manning, “Laughter by the Yard,” Radio Mirror, November 1938, 40–41, 64. 42. “Radio Its Own Menace,” 48. 43. Zolotow, “The Fiddler from Waukegan,” 142. 44. Al Boasberg advertisement, Variety, March 1, 1932, 36; Sid Silvers advertisement, Variety, December 8, 1931, 30; “Boasberg Walks on B&A over Difference in Stage-Air Royalty,” Variety, May 10, 1932, 55; “Authors! Authors!,” Variety, August 30, 1932, 57; “Percentage for 2,” Variety, May 31, 1932, 1; “Fleishmann Hour Program,” Variety, October 11, 1932, 58. 45. Al Boasberg advertisement, Variety, March 1, 1932, 36; “Air Getting Ex-Vaude Writers on Rebound,” Variety, May 31, 1932, 56. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 189 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 190 STUDIES IN AMERICAN HUMOR 46. Fred Allen, Treadmill to Oblivion (Boston: Little Brown, 1954), 70; “Air Gag Writers a Now Most Highly Paid Writing Contingent,” Variety, May 16, 1933, 43. 47. “Gag Writing: Its Big Business Now,” Literary Digest, December 12, 1936, 24, 26. 48. “Air Gag Writers,” Variety. 49. “Radio Its Own Menace,” Variety, February 21, 1933, 59. 50. Canada Dry Program Script, May 23, 1932. 51. Dialect was a staple of nineteenth-century textual humor and has never gone out of vogue. See, for instance, Walter Blair and Hamlin Hill, America’s Humor: From Poor Richard to Doonesbury (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980). On verbal slapstick and ethnic voices in American radio, see Douglas, Listening In; Hilmes, Radio Voices; Melvin Ely, The Adventures of Amos ’n’ Andy: A Social History of an American Phenomenon (New York: Free Press, 1991). In film, see Henry Jenkins, “ ‘Shall We Make It for New York or for Distribution?’: Eddie Cantor, ‘Whoopee,’ and Regional Resistance to the Talkies,” Cinema Journal 29, no. 3 (1990): 32–52. 52. After January 1933, Conn almost never again took on-air parts and decided to remain permanently behind the scenes. Benny hired a range of ex-vaudeville comics as dialect specialists (Sam Hearn, Ralph Ashe, Patsy Flick, and Benny Rubin) to play these occasional bit parts. Sam Hearn started appearing in 1933, although he did not become the Shlepperman character until August 1934. 53. Canada Dry Program Script, May 23, 1932. 54. Canada Dry Program Script, June 13, 1932. 55. Ralph M. Blagden, “Laughter around the Dial,” Christian Science Monitor, April 22, 1939, 4, 12. 56. “Little Bits from the Air,” Variety, August 23, 1932, 42. 57. “Little Bits from the Air,” Variety, October 18, 1932, 42. 58. “Canada Dry Program,” Canton [Ohio] OH Repository, January 20, 1933, 24; James Cannon, untitled, undated newspaper clipping, Benny Scrapbook 1932–1933, box 90, Benny Papers, University of Wyoming. 59. On the Chevrolet program, Howard Claney was the announcer, Frank Black led the orchestra, and James Melton, then Frank Parker, sang. 60. “Jack Benny is Back,” Ottawa Citizen, March 11, 1933, 7. 61. “Chicago Theater,” Variety, July 4, 1933, 14. 62. Don Wilson contract, 1940, box 97, Benny Papers, UCLA. 63. “Conn and Jack made a radical change in Benny’s type of humor. Before, Jack had told jokes. . . . As was customary with comedians, he got all the laugh lines. The new scripts, however, gave most of the laughs to the others in the cast.” See Beatty, “Unhappy Fiddler,” 143. 64. General Tire Show Script, June 8, 1934. 65. The Jell-O Program, which debuted October 14, 1934, at 7:00 p.m. EST, presented a new wrinkle for scripting, as Conn and Benny now had to be more careful to keep the humor extra clean and appropriate for all ages. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 190 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Becoming Benny 191 66. O. O. McIntyre, “New York Day by Day,” Rochester Evening Journal, September 26, 1934, 15. 67. “Jack Benny and Company,” Radio Guide, March 2, 1935, 13. 68. Beatty, “Sad Fiddler,” 64. 69. Orrin Dunlap, “Furiously Proceeds Radio’s Gag Hunt,” New York Times, August 26, 1934, SM 12, 15. 70. “Stars Shine Best When Polished,” 126. 71. Michele Hilmes, “Where Everybody Knows Your Name: Cheers and the Mediation of Cultures,” in Critiquing the Sitcom: A Reader, ed. Joanne Morreale (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2003), 213–23; 217. StAH 1.2_03_Fuller-Seeley.indd 191 20/10/15 9:38 AM This content downloaded from 128.59.222.107 on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:22:41 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Compartilhar