Considering the case presented, it is correct to affirm that: a. the denial of Maria to leave the property does not automatically generate mora ex...

Considering the case presented, it is correct to affirm that:

a. the denial of Maria to leave the property does not automatically generate mora ex re and depends on judicial or extrajudicial interpellation by Pedro;
b. the justification presented by Maria to remain in the property after the end of the comodato contract does not characterize unjust possession and dispossession;
c. Maria must pay rent to Pedro after the end of the comodato contract for a period of 6 months;
d. the comodato contract became effective for an indefinite period, since Pedro did not make the judicial or extrajudicial interpellation of Maria;
e. after the end of the comodato contract, as Maria remained in the property, the contract will be considered a lease and Pedro must file an eviction lawsuit.
a) a and b are correct.
b) b and c are correct.
c) c is correct.
d) d and e are correct.
e) e is correct.