Guilherme, a police delegate, initiated a police inquiry to investigate a supposed robbery offense, prosecutable by unconditional public criminal a...

Guilherme, a police delegate, initiated a police inquiry to investigate a supposed robbery offense, prosecutable by unconditional public criminal action. However, two months after the start of the investigations, no information was obtained regarding the criminal authorship. In the absence of minimum elements regarding the authorship, the police inquiry was archived, as provided for in procedural legislation. Six months after the archiving, new elements regarding the criminal authorship emerge. In this scenario, considering the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the dominant jurisprudence of the Superior Courts, it is correct to affirm that the police inquiry:


A) can be reopened, even if there is no news of other evidence or new evidence, as long as the prescription has not expired;
B) cannot be reopened, unless there is a request from the Public Prosecutor's Office;
C) cannot be reopened, unless there is a judicial determination;
D) can be reopened, as long as there is news of other evidence;
E) can be reopened, as long as there is new evidence.