Assuming that the statements are related to the Brazilian Judiciary and the Ministry of Public, which of them are true? I - The judge invested with...

Assuming that the statements are related to the Brazilian Judiciary and the Ministry of Public, which of them are true?
I - The judge invested with a sense of effectiveness in his/her performance must adopt adequate mental, functional, and procedural postures aimed at achieving the full exhaustion of the function for which he/she was preordained.
II - The judge is the agent capable of achieving justice in full and is susceptible to accepting all claims addressed to the Judiciary, without any distinction between those formulated by entities or people with economic sufficiency, but also those of interest to the vast legion of excluded people, currently deprived of access to Justice.
III - The state institution of the Public Ministry is endowed with autonomy and independence, and its role is not to ensure adequate balance in the pre-trial phase, but only in the own procedural relationship, collaborating so that the jurisdictional provision of the State is efficient.
IV - In the criminal area, the State invests in the function of Judge, and at the same time brings to itself the initiative of most actions. However, the State uses autonomous bodies to exercise both roles, as those who activate jurisdiction are not those who judge.
V - Regarding the performance of the Public Ministry and the effectiveness of access to Justice, it is important to remember that according to Cappelletti and Garth (1988), such effectiveness depends on the following waves: guarantee of legal representation to the poor; protection of diffuse and collective interests; simplification of procedures.
I - True
II - True
III - False
IV - True
V - True
a) I, II, IV and V are true.
b) I, III, IV and V are true.
c) II, III, IV and V are true.
d) I, II, III and IV are true.