Logo Passei Direto
Buscar
Material
páginas com resultados encontrados.
páginas com resultados encontrados.
details

Libere esse material sem enrolação!

Craque NetoCraque Neto

Ao continuar, você aceita os Termos de Uso e Política de Privacidade

details

Libere esse material sem enrolação!

Craque NetoCraque Neto

Ao continuar, você aceita os Termos de Uso e Política de Privacidade

Prévia do material em texto

INSTITUTO MEDIO POLITÉCNICO DE MAPUTO - iMEP
	Nível e Titulo de Qualificação:	 CV5 Curso: CC
	Título do Módulo: ULISSPP
	Código do módulo: UC HG025001
	Nome do Estudante: Kilton Cairo 
	Código do Estudante: 462762
	Instrumento da Avaliação Sumativa n°: 1 (Única) 
	Resultado de Aprendizagem n°: 1,2,3
	Avaliação:
	1ª Reavaliação:
	2ª Reavaliação: 
	Data: 
	Feedback do Avaliador:
	Resultado da Avaliação: ____________
	
	Assinatura do Avaliador: 
	Data: __/ /2024
	
	Assinatura do Estudante:
	Data: __/ /2024
	
	Assinatura de Verificador Interno:
	Data: __/ /2024
Oral English Evaluation 
	Learning outcomes
	1. Keep a social conversation on the topic of interest;
2. Use variety of strategies to maintain conversation;
3. Adapt the discourse in order to consider cultural aspects.
	Performance criteria 
	1. A) Engages in an oral communication to share essential and personal information about social, cultural and professional day-to-day;
B) Uses and responds to conventions and structures in communication;
C) Corrects and adapts the discourse to promote clarity and understanding during the interaction.
2. A) Makes contributions that are relevant to a particular subject and purpose;
B) Makes contributions that are relevant to the hearing and the situation;
C) Makes contributions that seek to keep the discussion.
3. A) Uses vocabulary, idioms, culturally accepted gestures;
B) Expresses ideas and opinions in order to reflect respect and sensitivity to cultural differences and different forms of expression.
Oral Presentation: Observation Checklist
	Criteria
	Check if observed 
	Comments / feedback
	Score
	Organization 
	
	
	
	Introduction and statement of purpose were included.
	
	
	
	Ideas were organized in a meaningful way. 
	
	
	
	Necessary background information was provided.
	
	
	
	A strong conclusion was included.
	
	
	
	Content 
	
	
	
	Topic was clearly defined and explained.
	
	
	
	Main points were clearly presented.
	
	
	
	Details to support main points were included.
	
	
	
	Appropriate vocabulary was used.
	
	
	
	Speaker was well informed on the topic.
	
	
	
	Speaker stayed focused on the topic.
	
	
	
	Delivery 
	
	
	
	Volume was appropriate for the audience.
	
	
	
	Enunciation was clear and precise.
	
	
	
	Speech was appropriately paced.
	
	
	
	Speaker maintained frequent eye contact.
	
	
	
	Body language was not too relaxed or stressed.
	
	
	
	Speaker was sensitive to audience reaction, adapted if necessary.
	
	
	
	Presentation Support 
	
	
	
	Speaker used appropriate visual aids and supports.
	
	
	
	Visual aids and supports were integrated in presentation.
	
	
	
	Pronunciation, spelling, grammar were accurate.
	
	
	
	Overall presentation was enthusiastic and effective 
	
	
	
	
	/ 80% recommended percentages 
	
Additional comments:
	
	
The End!
	1
	Oral Evaluation based on interaction – produced by dr. GARCIAS
IMEP – Instituto Medio Politécnico de Maputo 
image1.jpeg