Prévia do material em texto
Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 On the mechanics of structured sands T. CUCCOVILLO� and M. R. COOP{ To date the effect of structure on the behaviour of natural sands has focused almost exclusively on the component of bonding, and the effect of fabric has been largely overlooked. The paper describes a detailed investigation of the beha- viour of two natural sands by means of triaxial testing over a wide range of pressures. One material had bonding as the principal element of its structure and the other fabric. Following on from a paper of Cuccovillo and Coop which examined the in¯uence of the two structural elements on the small-strain stiffness, the cur- rent paper develops a new framework for the yielding and large-strain behaviour. It is sug- gested that structure should be considered as an element of the nature of a sand in addition to properties such as mineralogy, particle shape and grading. The resulting framework is then capable of encompassing the patterns of beha- viour seen for both bonding- and fabric-domi- nated sands. While bonding results in a cohesive mode of shearing, it is demonstrated that when fabric dominates, the shearing behaviour re- mains predominantly frictional, although the rates of dilation and peak strengths may be very much higher than for the reconstituted soil at the same stress±volume state. It is shown that it is not necessarily the position of the state of the soil relative to the critical-state line that distin- guishes strain-hardening and strain-softening be- haviour, but the proximity to the boundary determined in isotropic compression. KEYWORDS: fabric/structure of soils; laboratory tests; sands; soft rocks. Jusqu'ici, l'effet de structure sur le comporte- ment des sables naturels s'est axe presque ex- clusivement sur le composant de liaison; l'effet de la texture a eÂte le plus souvent oublieÂ. Cet expose deÂcrit une eÂtude deÂtailleÂe du comporte- ment de deux sables naturels au moyen d'essais triaxiaux dans une vaste fourchette de pressions. Pour l'un des mateÂriaux, le composant de liaison eÂtait l'eÂleÂment principal de sa structure et pour l'autre, c'eÂtait sa texture. Faisant suite aÁ une eÂtude de Cuccovillo et Coop qui avaient examine l'in¯uence des deux eÂleÂments structuraux sur la rigidite de petite deÂformation, cet expose deÂvel- oppe un nouveau cadre de travail pour l'eÂlasti- cite et le comportement de grande deÂformation. Nous suggeÂrons que la structure devrait eÃtre consideÂreÂe comme un eÂleÂment de la nature d'un sable en plus des proprieÂteÂs comme la mineÂralo- gie, la forme et la taille des particules. Le cadre de travail qui en reÂsulte est alors capable de tenir compte des modeÁles de comportement con- stateÂs pour les sables domineÂs par le composant de liaison et les sables domineÂs par la texture. Alors que la liaison donne un mode coheÂsif de cisaillement, nous deÂmontrons que lorsque la texture domine, le comportement au cisaillement demeure en preÂdominance frictionnel bien que les taux de dilatation et les reÂsistances de pointe puissent eÃtre beaucoup plus eÂleveÂs que dans le cas de sols reconstitueÂs et rameneÂs au meÃme eÂtat de tension-volume. Nous montrons que ce n'est pas neÂcessairement la position de l'eÂtat du sol par rapport aÁ la ligne d'eÂtat critique qui distingue le comportement de durcissement aÁ l'effort et de ramollissement aÁ l'effort mais la proximite de la frontieÁre deÂtermineÂe en com- pression isotrope. INTRODUCTION The behaviour of sands in laboratory or ®eld tests has traditionally been related to their relative den- sity (Dr), but more recent work has highlighted the de®ciencies of this approach. Experimental studies in the triaxial apparatus (e.g. Coop & Lee, 1993; Lade & Yamamuro, 1996) have shown that, pro- vided suf®ciently high pressures are reached, it is possible to identify a normal compression line (NCL) which lies parallel to the critical state line (CSL). It was then shown that strain-softening and strain-hardening modes of behaviour were de®ned not by Dr but by the combination of the speci®c volume (v), mean effective stress ( p9) and deviato- Cuccovillo, T. & Coop, M. R. (1999). GeÂotechnique 49, No. 6, 741±760 741 Manuscript received 30 July 1998; revised manuscript accepted 30 June 1999. Discussion on this paper closes 30 June 2000; for further details see p. ii.� South Bank University, London; formerly City Uni- versity, London. { City University, London. Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 ric stress (q9) that de®nes the location of the state of the soil relative to the NCL or CSL. This was in accordance with a critical state framework and, when associated with an analysis of the volumetric changes in stress±dilatancy terms, could be used to describe accurately the peak states observed. The locations of the CSL and NCL were found to be different for different sands (Coop & Cuccovillo, 1998) and were shown to be related to the amount of particle breakage that the soil underwent during loading and hence to the nature of the soil parti- cles. This nature was considered to be the grading, together with the mineralogy of the particles and their shapes. One of the principal drawbacks of this work was that it was almost all carried out on reconstituted sands. Studies of the behaviour of natural sands have, in contrast, been relatively rare, particularly as a result of the dif®culty of retrieving undisturbed samples. Structure in sands has often been simply identi- ®ed with the bonding which arises from inter- particle cementing, since interparticle forces are negligible, and it is on this component of structure that most recent research has been focused (e.g. Clough et al., 1981). Cemented sands have been seen to have patterns of behaviour that resemble those observed for structured clays and which are related to the elements of the soil structure created by the geological processes experienced by the soil since its deposition. State alone has therefore been considered insuf®cient to account for those patterns of behaviour which do not conform to the critical state framework. To distinguish features of beha- viour arising from structure from those related to changes in state, an approach that has been widely adopted has been to compare the response of the natural soil to that of the corresponding reconsti- tuted soil (e.g. Leroueil & Vaughan, 1990). Triaxial test data for shearing of structured soils have often been normalized with respect to the NCL and/or the CSL of the reconstituted soil. Although this approach has been very useful in highlighting qualitatively many features deriving from structure, it has failed to provide a uni®ed framework that could identify and fully describe mechanical features such as yielding, strength and a state boundary surface for structured soils. Further de- velopment of a consistent framework for natural sands has been prevented by the dif®culty in identifying a variable which could quantify struc- ture, as p9, q9 and v do for state, and it is this aspect of the mechanics of structured sands that is a central theme of this paper. For some cemented sands, in particular the carbonates, the usual comparisons with the beha- viour of reconstituted soils were not initially possi- ble, ®rstly because it was dif®cult to reconstitute the cemented soil without breaking its delicate shell particles and secondly because the interpreta- tion of the data was often complicated by large variations in the properties of the intact samples. This led some researchers to test arti®cially ce- mented sands, making comparisons not with the reconstituted soil but with soils made up of the same constituents in which bonding had not been allowed to develop (e.g. Huang & Airey, 1993; Coop & Atkinson, 1993). Using this method, Cuccovillo & Coop (1993) examined the in¯uence of the strength of the cement bonds by varying the amount of cement addedto an arti®cially cemented carbonate sand. Fig. 1 shows a schematic represen- tation of the isotropic compression behaviour they observed. The effect of the cement was to make the initial stress±strain behaviour stiffer and elas- tic, so that the gradual yield seen for the loose sand, which was attributed to the onset of particle breakage, was not seen for the cemented sand. The key difference in the behaviour of the strongly and weakly cemented soils was that the former reached states outside the intrinsic NCL de®ned by the uncemented soil, while the weakly bonded soil yielded before reaching the NCL. During shearing, three modes of behaviour could be identi®ed, as illustrated in Fig. 2, depending on the initial state of the sample relative to the yield curve of the cement bonds. At con®ning pressures which were low relative to the strength of the bonds, the behaviour was elastic up to a well-de®ned yield, followed by strain-softening towards a critical state. At intermediate pressures, yield occurred before reaching the critical state, so no peak strength was seen and the failure was essentially frictional. The only effect of the bonding at these intermediate pressures was therefore a stiffening of the initial stress±strain behaviour. At the highest pressures, the behaviour was ductile from the start as the Intrinsic isotropic normal compression line sw v ln p ′ w s Uncemented Cemented Weak Strong Fig. 1. Schematic comparison of the isotropic com- pression of weakly and strongly cemented carbonate sand 742 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 bonding had been broken during compression, and the stress±strain behaviour tended towards that of the uncemented soil. The effect of an increase in the cement content was to expand the yield curve of the cement bonds. The type of framework shown in Figs 1 and 2 has been developed considering only the compo- nent of soil structure arising from bonding. The in¯uence of fabric has, however, been largely over- looked, either because of a lack of data for intact sands with their intact fabric preserved or because of the belief that, unlike clays, this in¯uence was not important for sands, even if Barton (1993) identi®ed that for many coarse-grained soft rocks the transition from a loose sand to a sandstone involved not only the creation of bonding but also changes to the fabric. This paper will discuss the in¯uence of both aspects of structure on the mech- anics of sands, comparing and contrasting the behaviour of two sands, a calcarenite which has bonding as the dominant structural feature and a silica sandstone for which fabric is more impor- tant. Cuccovillo & Coop (1997b) examined the small-strain behaviour of the two materials, and the current paper now extends that work to exam- ine the behaviour at larger strains. In this investi- gation some of the data for the calcarenite are those from Coop & Atkinson (1993), which have been reinterpreted in the light of the new methods of analysis. Yield surface of cement Critical-state line 1 2 3 Yield point Critical state 1 2 3 q ′/p ′ M q ′ p ′ εa Fig. 2. Schematic diagram showing modes of shearing behaviour for cemented carbonate sands (after Coop & Atkinson, 1993) T a b le 1 . P ri n ci p a l ch a ra ct er is ti cs o f th e tw o st ru ct u re d sa n d s S o il P ar ti cl es C em en t S p ec i® c v o lu m e D ep o si ti o n o f ce m en t F ab ri c G eo lo g ic al h is to ry V ar ia b il it y o f so il S il ic a sa n d st o n e S tr o n g , so li d, ro u n d ed to su b ro u n d ed q u ar tz W ea k : ir o n o x id e L o w v � 1 : 4 5 A ft er g eo lo g ic al ov er co n so li d at io n an d d ev el o p m en t o f fa b ri c W el l- d e® n ed an d d en se ; in te rl o ck in g o w in g to p re ss u re so lu ti o n O v er co n so li d at ed , ó 9 v m ax ap p ro x . 9 M P a N o n e C al ca re n it e W ea k , h o ll o w an d an g u la r sh el l fr ag m en ts (C aC O 3 ) S tr o n g : ca lc iu m ca rb o n at e M ed iu m ± h ig h v � 1 : 6 8 ± 2 : 0 3 S o o n af te r p ar ti cl e d ep o si ti o n L o o se d ep o si ti o n al fa b ri c p re se rv ed b y ea rl y ce m en ti n g F ir st lo ad in g o n ly to cu rr en t d ep th L ar g e v ar ia ti o n in sp ec i® c v o lu m e an d am o u n t o f ce m en t ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 743 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 SOIL DESCRIPTIONS Table 1 gives a summary of the principal characteristics of the two structured sands. The silica sandstone was from the Lower Greensand series and was recovered as a block sample from about 5 m depth in a quarry near Maidstone, Kent. The soil is characterized by strong particles bonded by a weak cement. It was deposited during the Cretaceous in a shallow marine environment (Casey, 1961) and in its geological history it has been subjected to deep burial followed by the erosion of the overlying strata, so that it has been overconsolidated, with a past maximum vertical effective stress estimated to be around 9 MPa. An iron oxide cement was then deposited around the quartz grains at a late stage in the geological history from groundwater ¯owing through the sand (Warren, 1995). A scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a polished section is shown in Fig. 3. The cement is the white material which appears to weld the particles together. There is only a small amount of cement present, and so the low speci®c volume v of 1´45 is clearly related to the particle packing, or fabric, and not to the in®lling of the void spaces with cement. Apart from the relatively small amount of cement, Dapples (1972) has iden- ti®ed that the weakness of this type of bonding results from the poor adhesion of the iron oxide to the quartz. Reconstituted samples of both the silica sand- stone and the calcarenite were created by gently breaking the cement bonds while avoiding damage to the particles. For the silica sandstone Cuccovillo & Coop (1997b) found it to be impossible to recreate the intact speci®c volume by compaction of the reconstituted soil. The only way that this could be achieved was to overconsolidate the sample by isotropic compression in the triaxial apparatus, but the maximum stress of 70 MPa required to do this was far in excess of that ever experienced by the natural soil. The reason for the high density of the silica sandstone in situ was identi®ed from an examination of the thin section shown in Fig. 4, which shows a well-developed interlocking fabric. Dusseault & Morgenstern (1979) and Maxwell (1964) have attributed the development of this type of `locked' fabric in geologically old silica sands (pre-Quaternary) to pressure solution at the particle contacts, where the contact stresses are very much higher than the overburden stress. This then allows the particles to rearrange relative to one another, creating large grain contact areas and achieving particle packings which cannot be recreated when the soil is reconstituted, as the original interparticle contacts have been lost. This well-de®ned fabric was therefore created while the soil was buried Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrograph of the silica sandstone (after Cuccovillo & Coop, 1997b) Fig. 4. Thin section of the silica sandstone (width of photo equivalent to 0´7 mm; plain white light and stained void spaces) 744 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 deeply and long before the cement was deposited. The deposition of the iron oxide after the geological overconsolidation and the development of the fabric is then the reason why the bonds are still intact, as the strains experienced by the soil subsequent to these events were small. Although there is a natural variation in thedegree of bonding of the Lower Greensand, all the samples used in the current study were taken from the same block and so had a uniform speci®c volume and degree of bonding. The calcarenite samples were retrieved by triple- tube rotary coring and come from the site of the North Rankin offshore platform in Western Austra- lia. By comparison with the silica sandstone this calcarenite may be characterized as having weak particles and a strong interparticle cement. The soil is a biogenic carbonate sand comprising shells deposited in a warm coastal sea environment during the Pleistocene. Thin sections of two of the samples are shown in Fig. 5. The particles are angular, resulting in an open fabric. Under the cross-polar- ized light used to take the photographs, the void spaces are black and the white fringe that surrounds each particle is the cementing, which is calcium carbonate deposited soon after the time of deposi- tion of the particles. The type of shells and the amount of cement deposited are both sensitive to the precise depositional environment (Fookes, 1988; Apthorpe et al., 1988), and since the rates of deposition are slow, there are large and apparently random variations in the nature of the soils over small intervals of depth. Most of the calcarenite samples were from depths between 127 and 142 m. The variations within this range of depths of both the particle natures and the amount of cement deposited are evident in Fig. 5 and result in a wide range of speci®c volumes for the samples tested (1´68 to 2´03). Despite these differences, the soils, when reconstituted, were found to have remarkably simi- lar properties. Cuccovillo & Coop (1993) found that a single state boundary surface could be de®ned for all of the reconstituted samples tested. Another important feature that can be seen qualita- tively in Fig. 5 is the relationship between speci®c volume and degree of cementing. The more heavily cemented sample is much denser, partly as a result of the in®lling of the void spaces with the cement. The geological loading history of the soils has been one of ®rst loading only, and since the in situ stresses are well below those at yield, the cement has preserved the depositional fabric. Fig. 5. Thin sections of the calcarenites (width of photos equivalent to 1´4 mm; cross-polarized light): (a) loose and weakly bonded; (b) dense and strongly bonded ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 745 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 LABORATORY EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES Triaxial tests were carried out in a variety of apparatuses covering a range of stresses from 50 kPa to 70 MPa. Each of the apparatuses was computer controlled and data-logged and is de- scribed in detail by Cuccovillo & Coop (1999). Most tests were instrumented with a new system for the local measurement of the axial strain of the sample based on miniature linear variable differen- tial transformers (Cuccovillo & Coop, 1997a). Combined with new sample preparation methods and modi®cations to the setting-up procedure in the apparatus to ensure the coaxiality of the axial loading system with the sample (Cuccovillo & Coop, 1997b), it was possible to resolve the stiff- ness of the materials tested down to strains of 0´0001%. Although the data examined in this paper are for larger strain levels, it was found that these improvements were also necessary for a correct de®nition of the yield point during shearing. ISOTROPIC COMPRESSION When isotropically compressed, the intact calcar- enite reached states which were impossible for the reconstituted soil (Fig. 6(a)) and from this point of view the bonding may be characterized as strong within the scheme shown in Fig. 1. A clear rela- tionship existed between the speci®c volumes and mean effective stresses at yielding, which resulted in the identi®cation of an isotropic yield locus. This was found to be substantially coincident with the postyield compression curves and thus de®ned the boundary for the possible states attainable in isotropic compression. The offset between the iso- tropic boundaries of the intact and reconstituted soils reduced as the speci®c volume decreased, until the two boundaries became coincident. The isotropic boundary of the intact soil has therefore been modelled as bilinear, as indicated. One group of four samples, from a narrow depth range (133´7±135´5 m), was found, however, to have yield points which lay signi®cantly below those of all the other samples (Fig. 6(b)) and closer to the intrinsic NCL de®ned by the reconstituted samples. This is characteristic of a weaker bonding, which is likely to have resulted from a depositional environment that was signi®cantly different from those in which the other calcarenites were created. As none of these weaker samples was loaded far beyond yield, the postyield compression line which is shown, and will be used in later analyses, has been assumed to converge with the intrinsic NCL at the same point as for the stronger-bonded soils. For the silica sandstone, isotropic yielding oc- curred inside the permissible space of the reconsti- tuted soil (Fig. 7) and this material may therefore be classi®ed as a weakly bonded material. The isotropic boundary of the silica sandstone, there- fore, is likely to coincide with the NCL of the original uncemented soil as it was deposited in the ground. However, the soil as deposited would have had a slightly different initial grading from that of the current reconstituted soil because of the parti- cle breakage that the soil underwent under the high overburden pressure which this soil, unlike the calcarenite, had experienced before it became ce- mented. As was shown by Coop & Atkinson (1993), the location of the NCL of a soil is controlled by the initial grading, not the current, and a correct comparison between the compression behaviour of the intact soil and reconstituted sam- ples should, ideally, account for this small differ- ence in their initial gradings. In any case, the convergence of the compression data of the intact soil towards a slightly different NCL from that found for the reconstituted soil could not be con- ®rmed because of the limitation on the con®ning stress in the apparatus. SHEARING When sheared, the calcarenite was found to reach the same critical states as the reconstituted soil, de®ning a CSL in v±ln p9 space that was parallel to the NCL of the reconstituted soil (Coop & Atkinson, 1993). The silica sandstone reached similar stress ratios at the ultimate states to the reconstituted soil but localized failure of the intact soil prevented the identi®cation of critical states in terms of volume. For the reconstituted soil the CSL was again parallel to the NCL. An increase in con®ning pressure transformed the shear behaviour of both structured sands from strain-softening to strain-hardening. Typical stress± strain curves are shown in Figs 8 and 9. Here, except for one undrained test on the calcarenite, the data are all from drained tests following con- stant- p9 stress paths. At the start of each test the values of axial strain were those from the internal measurements, whereas at large strains the external measurements have been used. The strain-softening mode of behaviour was characterized for both soils by an initially linear stress±strain relationship and no change in volume. Cuccovillo & Coop (1997b) demonstrated that the linear stress±strain behaviour was also elastic and interpreted the end of this linear elastic response, which identi®ed yielding, as being the onset of bond degradation. Despite this common feature the two soils achieved their peak strength through dif- ferent modes of shearing. For the calcarenite the peak states were practically coincident with yield- ing and were followed by a rapid loss of strength and volumetric compression. Conversely, for the silica sandstone, at all but the very lowest con®n- ing stresses, which are not considered here, the peak states were accompanied by dilationand 746 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 plastic strains which developed after the soil had yielded and the bonds had started to degrade. For the calcarenite the near coincidence of the peak states with yielding is a clear indication of the cohesive nature of the peak strength of this struc- tured sand and the patterns of behaviour may be adequately described by Fig. 2. For the silica sandstone, however, the peak strengths were found to be frictional, as the stress±dilatancy analysis presented later will show, and the framework shown in Fig. 2 cannot therefore describe the behaviour observed. For both soils, strain-hardening was accompa- nied by volumetric compression. In the case of the silica sandstone this was associated solely with a behaviour that was non-linear from the start of shearing, indicating that at these con®ning pres- sures the bonds had been degraded during isotropic compression and had no further in¯uence on shear- ing. For the calcarenite, in contrast, at some inter- Fig. 6. Isotropic compression of the calcarenite: (a) stronger-bonded samples (after Cuccovillo & Coop, 1997b); (b) weaker-bonded samples Intact Reconstituted 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ln p ′: kPa (a) 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 v 100 1000 10000 100000 p ′: kPa Intact IB NCL CSL 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ln p ′: kPa (b) 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 v 100 1000 10000 100000 p ′: kPa Intact (data from Coop & Atkinson (1993)) Reconstituted CSL NCL RAN3-RAN4 Intact IB Stronger bonding Intact IB Weaker bonding ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 747 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 mediate stress levels, strain-hardening was also seen to be associated with an initially linear response. In this case the strength was therefore frictional and the bonds only contributed to an increase in the initial stiffness. At their critical states the intact samples of calcarenite and silica sandstone reached similar stress ratios to those of the corresponding reconsti- tuted soils as shown in Fig. 10. It is believed that in both cases the CSL is straight and that any tendency to curve at the high pressures is more likely to be due to incomplete testing. The peak strengths of both materials were found to increase with increasing p9 (Fig. 11). The varia- tions of the speci®c volumes at the peak for the intact samples of both soils were small (within �0:01) and these differences therefore could only have had a negligible in¯uence on the peak strengths observed. For the silica sandstone a unique envelope can be identi®ed which converges towards the CSL at higher values of p9. The data for the calcarenite are insuf®cient to identify peak failure envelopes, but the much lower strength of sample RAN6 compared to the other intact samples of calcarenite seems likely to be not only because of the lower p9 but also, and perhaps predominantly, because this was one of the four weaker-bonded samples. Figure 11 also shows that the peak states de®ned by the two intact soils lie well above those de®ned by the reconstituted soils. However, a correct com- parison needs to account for the in¯uence of differences in the speci®c volumes between the intact and reconstituted soils, and this will be done later by means of a normalization of the data with respect to an equivalent pressure. STRESS DILATANCY OF A NATURAL SILICA SANDSTONE As for the reconstituted soil, the peak stress ratios of the intact silica sandstone were achieved when the rate of dilation was at its maximum. This indicates that the peak strength of this structured sand was purely frictional, in contrast to the cohe- sive nature of the peak strength of the calcarenite. In the following analyses of these states, the dila- tancy d has been de®ned as d � ÿäå p v äåp s (1) where äåp v and äåp s are the plastic components of the volumetric and shear strains. The dilatancy has only been calculated for the higher values of the stress ratio ç(� q9= p9), for which the elastic com- ponent of both strains is negligible, as are the bedding errors in äåp v, which was measured using an external volume gauge. In Fig. 12 the peak stress ratio (çp) is plotted against the maximum dilatancy (dmax). The intact soil reached a dilatancy of 1´7, which is very much higher than either the maximum value of 0´3 for the reconstituted soil or that of 0´75 reported by Rowe (1969) for reconstituted silica sands with the densest possible packing. Despite these remarkable differences, the intact and reconstituted soils fol- R9 R10 Intact Reconstituted NCL 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ln p ′: kPa 1.20 v 1.45 1.60 1.75 1.90 100 1000 10000 100000 p ′: kPa Fig. 7. Isotropic compression of the silica sandstone (after Cuccovillo & Coop, 1997b) 748 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 lowed the same stress±dilatancy relationship, which may be described by an equation of the same form as the ¯ow rule used in Cam Clay (Roscoe & Scho®eld, 1963), and which was also chosen by Nova & Wood (1979) for their model for sands sheared in triaxial compression: çp � M � ádmax (2) where M is the value of ç at the critical state and á is a constant. The ®gure shows, however, that because of a relatively low value of á for this soil, ¯ow rules such as that of the original Cam Clay or that proposed by Rowe (1962) cannot be used, as they signi®cantly overestimate the peak strength. A large difference between the dilatancies was still seen when comparisons were made between the behaviours of the intact and reconstituted soils at volumetric states which were similar relative to the CSL. Fig. 13(a) shows values of p9=p9cs at the peak stress ratio, indicated as ( p9=p9cs)p, plotted against dmax, where p9cs is an equivalent pressure taken on the CSL and is de®ned in Fig. 14. For the same normalized state the dilatancy at peak of the intact soil is still very much higher than that of the reconstituted soil. The trend of the data for the intact soil seems to indicate a linear relationship as for the reconstituted soil. However, an extrapola- tion of the line for the intact soil gives an intercept with a value of ( p9=p9cs)p greater than unity. This suggests that the CSL of the intact soil in v±ln p9 space is located to the right of that which was found for the reconstituted soil, although this could Fig. 8. Typical stress±strain curves for shearing of the calcarenite: (a) undrained test at p9init � 255 kPa; (b) test at constant p9 of 1400 kPa; (c) test at constant p9 of 4910 kPa Yield point q ∆u C1 p1′ 5 255 kPa 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 εa: % (a) q : k P a 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 ∆ u : k P a Yield pointN3 p ′ 5 1400 kPa 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 εa: % (b) q : k P a 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 25 0 5 10 15 ε v : %εv q ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 749 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 not be con®rmed experimentally, because of strain localization in some tests and premature ending of others due to the strain limit of the radial strain belt. It is possible that the differences in the initial grading of the intact and reconstituted soils may have been responsible for the different locations of their CSLs, as discussed above. Fig. 13(b) shows, however, that even when the states of the intact soil are normalized with respect to an offset CSL, assumed to be parallel to that of the reconstituted soil, although the intercept is now the same, a large difference is still seen in the dilatancy of the intact and reconstituted soils. Even if the high peak strengths of the natural silica sandstone are fric- tional, they are therefore only in part a conse- quence of the high density of the intact soil. Its interlocked fabric and the presence of some re- maininginterparticle cementing are therefore be- lieved to be responsible for the higher strengths of the intact soil. The values of dilatancy for the silica sandstone were of a similar order to those observed in shear box tests by Dusseault & Mor- genstern (1979) for three natural silica sands which had several features in common with that tested here, notably that they were geologically old and had a quartz composition with a high density and interlocked fabric. Qualitative considerations of energy balance suggest that the dilation of the intact soil after yielding is inhibited by the interlocked fabric and by the continued presence of some of the bonding. Fig. 15 shows that prior to peak the dilatancy experienced by the intact samples at a given stress ratio is smaller than that of the reconstituted samples and that the rate of dilation for the intact soil decreases as the p9 at which the samples were sheared reduces. This initial delay is later compen- sated for by a faster dilation that culminates at peak. In terms of energy, the total work done by the stresses at the boundary of the soil element (ÄW ) is partly dissipated in friction (ÄWfric) and partly spent in disrupting the structure of the soil (ÄWstruc), so that ÄW � ÄWfric � ÄWstruc (3) For axisymmetry and for a unit volume, equation (3) can be written as q9 äåp s � p9äåp v � Mp9äåp s � ÄWstruc (4) or q9 p9 � M ÿ äå p v äåp s � ÄWstruc p9äåp s (5) To maintain a balance in equation (5), since M is a constant, at a given stress ratio, if work is spent in degrading the bonding and disrupting the soil fabric the rate of dilation has to decrease. Up to yielding, the presence of bonding prevents the intact soil from dilating. After yielding, the gradual degradation of the bonds and the disruption of the fabric inhibit the dilation of the soil, which is later recovered by a more rapid increase of the dilatancy until a maximum is reached, which both corre- sponds to and causes the higher peak strength. A FRAMEWORK FOR THE BEHAVIOUR OF STRUCTURED SANDS To account for the effect that the presence of cementing has on the volumetric state Cuccovillo & Coop (1993) normalized the stress paths for both the intact and the reconstituted samples of calcarenite by means of p9cs. Fig. 16(a) shows that for the samples of intact calcarenite that had not yielded during isotropic compression, neither a 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 εa: % (c) q : k P a 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 25 0 5 10 15 ε v : % εv q N2 p ′ 5 4910 kPa Fig. 8. (Cont.) 750 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 Fig. 9. Typical stress±strain curves for constant- p9 shearing of the silica sandstone: (a) p9 � 900 kPa; (b) p9 � 14 400 kPa; (c) p9 � 60 000 kPa D1 p ′ 5 900 kPa 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 εa: % (a) q : k P a 0 210 ε v : % q 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 25 0 5 10 εv 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 εa: % (b) q : k P a 0 210 ε v : % 6000 12000 18000 24000 30000 25 0 5 10 εv q A2 p ′ 5 14400 kPa 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 εa: % (c) q : k P a 0 210 ε v : % 15000 30000 45000 60000 75000 25 0 5 10 εv q A1 p ′ 5 60000 kPa ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 751 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 unique yield surface nor a state boundary surface (SBS) could be identi®ed. In Fig. 16(b) it can be seen that for the samples that had been compressed beyond yield, the normalized stress paths contract progressively towards the SBS of the reconstituted soil until the isotropic boundary of the intact soil becomes coincident with the NCL of the reconsti- tuted soil. The method of analysis was therefore re-exam- ined and it was found that by taking an equivalent Fig. 10. Critical states: (a) calcarenite; (b) silica sandstone Intact Reconstituted CSL 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 p ′: kPa (a) 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 q : k P a Intact Reconstituted CSL 0 15000 30000 45000 60000 75000 p ′: kPa (b) 0 15000 30000 45000 60000 75000 q : k P a ? ? 752 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 pressure on the isotropic boundary of the intact soil ( p9IB; see Fig. 14) it was possible to identify both yielding and state boundary surfaces. The approach taken was that of considering the struc- ture to be an intrinsic property characterizing the nature of the soil, in the same way that grading, particle mineralogy and particle shape are for reconstituted sands. The intact and the reconsti- tuted calcarenite therefore have different natures, or, in other words, they are different soils. The change in nature due to the presence of interparti- cle bonding in the intact calcarenite is re¯ected by Fig. 11. Peak states: (a) calcarenite; (b) silica sandstone N3 (1.74) C1 (1.75) RAN6 (1.76) R1 (1.71) R2 (1.72) (1.74) Ultimate state intact Ultimate state reconstituted Peak state intact Peak state reconstituted CSL v at peak 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 p ′: kPa (a) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 q : k P a 0 6000 12000 18000 24000 30000 p ′: kPa (b) 0 6000 12000 18000 24000 30000 q : k P a Ultimate state intact Ultimate state reconstituted Peak state intact Peak state reconstituted CSL Peak envelope intact ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 753 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 the change in the location of the isotropic bound- ary. The shearing data for each soil should then be normalized with respect to the isotropic boundary for the particular soil. Whereas for the reconsti- tuted soil, normalizations with respect to either the NCL or CSL are equivalent because the two lines are parallel, for the intact soil this is not the case. The isotropic boundary of the calcarenite in v±ln p9 space will be referred to in the following as the intact isotropic boundary (intact IB). This is represented by two straight lines in Fig. 6: a steeper initial portion representing the postyield compression of the intact samples and then, for values of speci®c volume less than 1´465, a part Original Cam Clay Rowe Intact Reconstituted ηp 5 0.53dmax 1 1.29 20.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 dmax 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 η p Fig. 12. Stress±dilatancy relationship for peak states of the silica sandstone Fig. 13. In¯uence of state on dilatancy for the intact and reconstituted silica sandstone: (a) using the same CSL location; (b) using an offset CSL for the intact soil Intact Reconstituted 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 dmax (b) 0 0.5 1 1.5 (p ′/p ′ cs ) p (p ′/p ′cs)p 5 22.06 dmax 1 1 (p ′/p ′cs)p 5 20.49 dmax 1 1 Intact Reconstituted 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 dmax (a) 0 0.5 1 1.5 (p ′/p ′ cs ) p (p ′/p ′cs)p 5 22.06 dmax 1 1 (p ′/p ′cs)p 5 20.78 dmax 1 1.59 v CSL Intrinsic NCL Compression of intact sample Current state pcs′ pe′ pIB′ ln p ′ Fig. 14. De®nition of the normalizing parameters used in this paper D3 D5 A2 Intact Reconstituted η 5 0.53d 1 1.29 Test D3 D5 A2 p ′: kPa 3460 5600 14400 20.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 d 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 η Fig. 15. Comparison between the stress±dilatancy re- lationships of the intact and reconstituted samples of the silica sandstone 754 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 which is coincident with the NCL of the reconsti- tuted soil. As previously discussed, for the four weaker-bonded calcarenite samples, a lower intact IB was used than for the other samples (Fig. 6(b)). Values of an equivalent pressure p9IB were then calculated for each sample on the appropriate intact IB. For the reconstituted soil the values of p9IB were taken on the intrinsic NCL for all volumes. It should be pointed out that in this type of normalization the critical states of the intact soils are identi®ed by a single point only for values of the speci®c volume smaller than1´465. Critical states reached at higher speci®c volumes are lo- cated along the line represented by a value of the stress ratio ç equal to M and by values of p9= p9IB smaller than 0´34. This method of analysis was used by Cuccovillo & Coop (1997b) to examine the in¯uence of state on the small-strain stiffness of the calcarenite. Figure 17 shows the yield surface for the calcar- Fig. 16. Normalized stress paths for the calcarenite (adapted from Cuccovillo & Coop, 1993): (a) samples that did not yield in isotropic compression; (b) samples that yielded in isotropic compression RAN Stress path intact After Coop & Atkinson (1993) Yield point ISBS RAN5 RAN6 N3 C1 C3 η 5 M 0 3 6 9 p ′/pcs′ (a) 0 3 6 q /p cs′ RAN1 RAN4 RAN3 N5 N7 N4 N2 η 5 M RAN Stress path intact (weaker bonding) Stress path intact (stronger bonding) ISBS After Coop & Atkinson (1993) 0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 0 1.5 3 4.5 6 p ′/pcs′ (b) q /p cs′ ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 755 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 enite that may be identi®ed using this normaliza- tion. The yield points in isotropic compression were located to the left of the isotropic boundary, resulting in a value of p9=p9IB of less than unity. It can be seen that, using this approach, the yield points of the calcarenite now de®ne the same yield surface irrespective of their degree of bonding. For the calcarenite, this normalization proved to be of great importance in accounting for the large varia- bility of both the speci®c volume and the degree of bonding of the samples tested and hence for the in¯uence of both of these factors on the yield stress. Figure 18 shows the normalized stress paths of the intact samples of calcarenite sheared after isotropic yielding. Superimposed are the stress paths of the reconstituted samples which de®ne the intrinsic state boundary surface (ISBS). For the intact samples sheared from states located on the portion of the intact IB convergent with the NCL, the stress paths lie above the ISBS. As the state of the intact soil prior to shearing approaches the NCL, the stress path becomes coincident with the ISBS as shown by sample N5. The normalization therefore identi®es the space of permissible states of the intact soil, which could not be achieved by the p9cs normalization used in Fig. 16. The samples with weaker bonding reached states which are above the ISBS but within the space limited by the stress paths of the more strongly cemented sam- ples. In Fig. 19 the stress paths of the calcarenite samples sheared before isotropic yielding and the yield surface are superimposed on the ISBS and on the outer boundary surface de®ned in Fig. 18. In this representation the values of the state variable p9=p9IB can now be used to distinguish modes of shear behaviour of the intact soil. For the calcar- enite the yield surface, which de®nes the domain of normalized states in which the shear behaviour is controlled by bonding, occupies a large portion of the permissible space. This means that over the whole pressure range and for the large range of densities of the calcarenite, the shear behaviour was mainly cohesive. Frictional behaviour for the calcarenite, which is behaviour associated with states beyond the yield surface but still within the intact SBS, was accompanied by volumetric com- pression and controlled by a progressive mechan- ism of bond degradation and particle breakage. The transition between the cohesive and frictional modes of behaviour corresponds to a value of p9=p9IB of 0´42, which is where the yield surface meets the line of gradient M . For values of p9=p9IB smaller than 0´42 the calcarenite reached peak states which were all located on the yield surface, so that the peak strength was solely cohesive. For values of p9= p9IB greater than 0´42, the strength was frictional and coincident with the critical state. In these cases, however, the interparticle bonding contributed to an increased stiffness of the soil prior to yielding (Cuccovillo & Coop, 1997b). Moving the state of the soil towards the intact IB does not change the value of stiffness determined by the bonds but decreases the range of strains over which bonding enhances stiffness, until for states on the intact IB the behaviour becomes non- linear from the start of shearing. For the silica sandstone, yield and state bound- ary surfaces were identi®ed by taking an equivalent pressure on the critical-state line. Because of the high initial density of the silica sandstone and the weak bonding its behaviour in isotropic compres- sion was seen to be similar to that of an uncemen- C1 D1 η 5 M Yield point (stronger bonding) Yield point (weaker bonding) Yield surface 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 p ′/p IB′ q /p IB′ Fig. 17. Yield surface for the calcarenite 756 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 ted sand, for which the critical-state line and the isotropic boundary are parallel. Therefore, for the silica sandstone the appropriate line of reference for the normalization can be either the isotropic boundary or the CSL. In Fig. 20 the states of the intact soil have been normalized with respect to values of p9cs taken on a different critical-state line from that of the reconstituted soil, as was indicated by the stress±dilatancy data in Fig. 13. The yield points again identify a clear yield surface, which, for the silica sandstone, occupies only a small portion of the permissible space of the intact soil and is entirely contained within the ISBS. This demonstrates that the shear behaviour of the silica sandstone was mainly frictional. States between the yield and state boundary surfaces were associated with bond degradation and were accompanied by dilation on the dry side of the critical state, or compression on the wet side of the critical state. A peak strength resulting from cohesion was observed only at the very lowest pressures. Otherwise the peak strengths were frictional and substantially higher than those of the reconstituted soil because of the greater dilatancy. Fig. 18. Normalized stress paths for reconstituted and intact samples of the calcarenite sheared after isotropic yielding: (a) stronger-bonded samples; (b) weaker-bonded samples η 5 M 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 p ′/p IB′ (a) q /p IB′ N5 1.52 1.54 1.521.66 1.66 Intact (stronger bonding) reconstituted v at the start of shearing η 5 M 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 p ′/p IB′ (b) q /p IB′ 1.52 1.54 1.521.66 1.66 Intact (weaker bonding) Intact (stronger bonding) v at the start of shearing ISBS 1.73 1.73 ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 757 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 CONCLUSIONS The shear behaviour of natural sands has been shown to be controlled by mechanisms which differ from those for reconstituted sands and which result from their structure. These mechanisms can be easily understood once it is recognized that the nature of a sand is de®ned not only by the type of the material constituents but also by the processes experienced in the ground during its geological history. These processes are re¯ected in the soil structure, which, it is suggested here, should be considered as an additional element of the soil nature. It is then possible to interpret the shear behaviour of two substantially different structured sands in the light of the differences in their nature, which leads to the development of a general frame- η 5 M 0 0.5 1 0 0.5 p ′/p IB′ q /p IB′ Stress path Yield surface Outer intact SBS ISBS Fig. 19. Normalized stress paths for calcarenite samples sheared prior to isotropic yielding 0 0.5 0 0.5 Yield surface Stress path reconstituted Stress path intact Yield point intact ISBS Hvorslev surfaces Roscoe surface Yield surface 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 η 5 M p ′/pcs′ q /p cs′ Fig. 20. Normalized shear behaviour of the silica sandstone 758 CUCCOVILLOAND COOP Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 work in which the various features of the behaviour of the two soils are explained in terms of the stress±volume state of the soil. As shown by the calcarenite and the silica sandstone, the isotropic boundary of a structured sand is controlled by its nature and therefore, among other things, by its structure. Different modes of shear behaviour have been shown to be controlled by the location of the state relative to the isotropic boundary of the soil. It is only when the isotropic boundary happens to be parallel to the critical-state line that reference to either one of them is equivalent. An isotropic boundary parallel to the critical-state line was seen for the silica sandstone, where fabric was the most important structural feature and for which bonding was weak. For the calcarenite, in which the structure arose principally from a strong bonding, the isotropic boundary was not parallel to the critical-state line, and references to states on the `dry' or `wet' side of the critical state become meaningless for distin- guishing different modes of shear behaviour. Sands in which structure arises predominantly from bonding would have shear behaviour which is largely cohesive and would follow the patterns of behaviour set out in Fig. 2. As is shown by the calcarenite, the peak strength would be solely cohesive and the soil would show brittle failure. Frictional behaviour would only be seen at con®n- ing pressures that are suf®ciently high and/or at densities that are suf®ciently low to cause the disruption of the bonds owing to yielding. The frictional behaviour would then be dominated by compression and particle crushing and the strength would be achieved through strain-hardening to an ultimate state. The principal problems for engineer- ing design in such materials might arise from pro- gressive failure mechanisms because of the strain- softening behaviour or from the large volumetric compression that might occur, which might give rise to large settlements or reduce the boundary stresses acting on an engineering structure such as a pile. Sands in which the structure arises predomi- nantly from an interlocking fabric and in which the bonding is weak would have a shear behaviour that is largely frictional. This behaviour cannot be described adequately either by a conventional soil mechanics framework based on the behaviour of reconstituted materials or by the patterns of beha- viour shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 21 identi®es schemati- cally the main features of behaviour for a fabric- dominated sand. As shown by the silica sandstone, the shear mechanisms would be dominated by dilation, which would be the cause of the peak strengths. The stress±strain behaviour would be non-linear for much of the range of con®ning stresses (case 2b) and, if seen, linearity would be con®ned to the initial part of shearing (case 2a). Compression and particle crushing would be lim- ited to only the very highest stresses (case 3), and if the sand has a small degree of bonding, cohesive peaks would only be seen at the lowest con®ning stresses (case 1). Because of the dilation these sands would give particularly high bearing capaci- ties, and design methods for this type of soil could follow those normally applied to dense sands, although a determination of the peak strength from reconstituted samples would greatly underestimate the strength of the soil in the ground because of the much greater dilation of the natural material. To develop a general framework which is valid for both frictional and cohesive behaviour, it is proposed that the strain-softening and strain-hard- ening modes of shear behaviour should be distin- guished on the basis of the location of the state of the soil relative to its isotropic boundary rather than to its critical-state or intrinsic normal com- pression line. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research was funded by the EPSRC, to whom the authors are grateful. Support was also given by the Nuf®eld Foundation through a grant to the ®rst author. The calcarenite samples were kindly provided by BP International. REFERENCES Apthorpe, M., Garstone, J. & Turner, G. J. (1988). Depositional setting and regional geology of North Yield point Peak state Critical state 1 2a 2b 3 M εa q ′/p ¢ p ¢ q ′ 1 2a 2b 3 Yield surface of cement Peak envelope Critical-state line Fig. 21. Schematic diagram showing modes of shearing behaviour for the silica sandstone ON THE MECHANICS OF STRUCTURED SANDS 759 Delivered by ICEVirtualLibrary.com to: IP: 130.102.42.98 On: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:37:20 Rankin A foundation sediments. Proceedings of the international conference on calcareous sediments, Perth, vol. 2, pp. 357±366. Barton, M. E. (1993). Cohesive sands: the natural transi- tion from sands to sandstones. Proceedings of the international symposium on geotechnical engineering of hard soils±soft rocks, Athens, vol. 1, pp. 367±374. Casey, R. (1961). The stratigraphical palaeontology of the Lower Greensand. Palaeontology 3, Part 4, 487±621. Clough, G. W., Sitar, N. & Bachus, R. C. (1981). Ce- mented sands under static loading. J. Geotech. Engng Div., ASCE 107, No. GT6, 799±818. Coop, M. R. & Atkinson, J. H. (1993). The mechanics of cemented carbonate sands. GeÂotechnique 43, No. 1, 53±67. Coop, M. R. & Cuccovillo, T. (1998). The in¯uence of geological origin on the behaviour of carbonate sands. Proceedings of the international symposium on problematic soils, IS-Tohoku 98, Sendai, Japan, pp. 607±610. Coop, M. R. & Lee, I. K. (1993). The behaviour of granular soils at elevated stresses. Proceedings of the C. P. Wroth memorial symposium, Oxford pp. 186± 198. Cuccovillo, T. & Coop, M. R. (1993). The in¯uence of bond strength on the mechanics of carbonate soft rocks. Proceedings of the international symposium on geotechnical engineering of hard soils±soft rocks, Athens, vol. 1, pp. 447±455. Cuccovillo, T. & Coop, M. R. (1997a). The measurement of local axial strains in triaxial tests using LVDTs. GeÂotechnique 47, No. 1, 167±172. Cuccovillo, T. & Coop, M. R. (1997b). Yielding and pre- failure behaviour of structured sands. GeÂotechnique 47, No. 3, 491±508. Cuccovillo, T. & Coop, M. R. (1999). An automated triaxial apparatus for elevated pressures. In Non- destructive and automated testing for soil and rock properties, ASTM STP 1350. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 231±245. Dapples, E. C. (1972). Some concepts of cementation and lithi®cation of sandstones. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 56, No. 1, 3±25. Dusseault, M. B. & Morgenstern, N. R. (1979). Locked sands. J. Engng Geol. 12, 117±131. Fookes, P. G. (1988). The geology of carbonate soils and rocks and their engineering characterisation and de- scription. Proceedings of the international conference on calcareous sediments, Perth, vol. 2, pp. 787±806. Huang, J. T. & Airey, D. W. (1993). The effects of cement and density on an arti®cially cemented sand. Proceedings of the international symposium on geo- technical engineering of hard soils±soft rocks, Athens, vol. 1, pp. 553±560. Lade, P. V. & Yamamuro, J. A. (1996). Undrained sand behaviour in axisymmetric tests at high pressures. J. Geotech. Engng Div., ASCE 122, No. GT2, 120±129. Leroueil, S. & Vaughan, P. R. (1990). The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. GeÂotechnique 40, No. 3, 467±488. Maxwell, J. C. (1964). In¯uence of depth, temperature and geologic age on porosity of quartzose sandstone. Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 48, No. 5, 697±709. Nova, R. & Wood, D. M. (1979). A constitutive model for sand in triaxial compression. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods in Geomech. 3, 255±278. Roscoe, K. H. & Scho®eld, A. N. (1963). Mechanical behaviour of an idealised `wet' clay. Proceedings of the European conference on soil mechanics and foun- dation engineering, Wiesbaden, vol. 1, pp. 4±54. Rowe, P. W. (1962). The stress±dilatancy relationfor static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269, 500±527. Rowe, P. W. (1969). The relation between the shear strength of sands in triaxial compression, plane strain and direct shear. GeÂotechnique 19, No. 1, 75±86. Warren, C. (1995). Private communication. 760 CUCCOVILLO AND COOP INTRODUCTION SOIL DESCRIPTIONS LABORATORY EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES ISOTROPIC COMPRESSION SHEARING STRESS DILATANCY OF A NATURAL SILICA SANDSTONE A FRAMEWORK FOR THE BEHAVIOUR OF STRUCTURED SANDS CONCLUSIONS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REFERENCES