Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
RCM Corinne Grenier 1 INNOVATION STRATEGY OF COMPETITIVE COMPANIES AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP Track Three : Diffusion of innovations PPT 3c : Integrating users in the diffusion of innovation Professeur RCM : Corinne Grenier Main ideas – Integrating users in the diffusion process Users are not only consumers but Actors whose ideas and whose way of consuming products / services contribute to the diffusion of the innovation as well as the emergence of incremental innovation The design of the innovation is more and more an open process, including users (and partners, see Session 2) The product is not “closed” (stabilized) when it enters the market; it is modified through the “uses” (usages) of consumers RCM : Corinne Grenier The content of PPT 3c Notion of use (“usage”) and attitudes of companies to dealing with creative consumers How to integrate users into innovation process (lead-users, communities of users) The notion of Open Innovation RCM : Corinne Grenier RCM : Corinne Grenier 4 Notion of usage : making the difference between: - social use : “to do what ?” - ergonomic use : “how to use it ?” - economic efficiency : “how much does it cost ?” The notion of use we speak about: = What is important for the user : the real use of the product Notion of uses - “usage” . The innovation is never used as the company has been expected. The consumers always have some space of freedom to invent their use of products Think for instance to the IPod. Each of you has got specific and personal ways of using IPod . What matters for companies: knowing how consumers use their products in their daily life – and less how companies expect the consumers use the products RCM : Corinne Grenier 5 Speaking about “use” is about speaking about “Creative Consumers” (1) Notion of uses - “usage” The notion of “Creative Consumers” and of uses (“usages”) - Defined as customers who adapt, modify, or transform a proprietary offering (Berthon and al., 2007) Uses defined as “Les arts de faire” of individuals by Michel de Certeau (1980) - Users always have their own way of doing, their own “operational art”; consequently, they act differently than the a priori way of using products defined by companies (and incorporated in the formal framework of the product) - For Michel de Certeau (1980) : there is always a creativity of ordinary people. Is is often a hidden and tacit form of creativity; each one invents his own manner to navigate (and experiment) among all the set of the products imposed. RCM : Corinne Grenier 6 Passive customer Active customer Persuasion’s work Transaction’s work with individual buyers Development’s work of consumer loyalty on the long term Customer as co-productor of value Period 70s., beginning 80 s. End 80 s, beginning 90s. 90’s Years 2000 Nature of role and relationship with customer Customer considered as passive buyer having only one preset role of consumption Customer belongs to communities ; he creates value Leaders state of mind An average statistical data An individual statistical data The customer is a person with whom a good relationship has to be created The customer is not simply one person, but embedded in social network, a figure of this social network Modes of interaction (customer/compa nies) Investigations and quantitative marketing studies ; very little feedback on the products launched Call center, on line and phone assistance ... Better identification of problems Offer enriched by users observation ; feasible solutions elaborated from these observations of users’ common practices Costumer is coproductor starting from his personal experiments ; having a real place and role in the design process Mode and object of communication Access to preset groups Marketing databases Relational marketing Active dialogue with customers which has an impact on design and product production. Evolution in marketing practices Notion of uses - “usage” RCM : Corinne Grenier 7 Speaking about “use” is about speaking about “Creative Consumers” (2) Notion of uses - “usage” Recognizing the uses of consumers is also a political move towards recognizing that consumers (as citizens) have something to do and to say Political and social validity of various knowledge ; knowledge can be useful and relevant even if not validated by the scientific authorities (see for example Ethnosciences) Emerging strong controversy on the so called “specialized knowledge” (GMO, nuclear energy, sustainable development....) : citizens have something right to say and want to participate into these scientific debates : technology and technology-based development are not longer the responsibility of engineers Something we observe that citizens (as consumers, users…) are at the origin of innovations. They create interests for innovation instead of companies (see next page) RCM : Corinne Grenier 8 Notion of uses - “usage” Something we observe that citizens (as consumers, users…) are at the origin of innovations. They create interests for innovation instead of companies. For instead, when patient create the AFM (Association Française contre les Myopathies – French Association against Myopathies): - Patients and their families alert public authorities, biotech and pharmaceutical companies - They create a “public interet” and issues for all these parties to involve in research against myopathies - consequences: AFM annual money raise campaign, pharmaceutical companies involved in R&D and real medical progresses in curing myopathies… Non compulsory reading . Callon et Rabeharisoa (1998), “L'implication des malades dans les activités de recherche soutenues par l'Association française contre les myopathies », Revue Sciences sociales et santé, Vol 16/3, . pp. 41-65. Illustration Compulsory reading . Langstrup H. (2010), “Interpellating Patients as Users: Patient Associations and the Project-Ness of Stem Cell Research”, Science Technology Human, p. 573-594 RCM : Corinne Grenier 9 Why companies may learn from the way consumers really use their products Notion of uses - “usage” Very often, the user knows more than the producer; he invents what to do with the product and how to use is in his daily life => what constitutes critical insights for further innovation Sometimes, companies tend to make their innovating products much more complex (as if complexity means innovation…), by adding functionalities, technologies… which are not really useful for the consumers ; and such a move towards much more complexity makes the product expensive and difficult to be manipulated => learning from the daily uses of consumers may help companies avoiding these risks. See the next page Non compulsory reading . Poulain G. (2002) “l’innovation par l’usage” RCM : Corinne Grenier 10 Risks and consequences of not taking usage into account (Poulain 2002) Relevance Risks (examples) Consequences (examples) Technical Offering functions which do not meet the real needs or which remain non- compatible with other systems These functions will not be used and those which are used, if they can not be modified when used, are likely to be obsolete quickly Economic Asking the customers to pay for additional functions Generally speaking, only 10 to 20% of the functions are used by consumers Ergonomic Encountering difficulties in the use and the representation of the product Having to use the "hot line“ too much; returning the product because it doesnot fill the foreseen uses. . Social Massive rejection of the product, withdrawal from the market, mistrust campaign or denigration, etc. Delays in the diffusion of the product, pressures from the market to deliver a principle of social precaution Technical, social and economic Increasing the Complexity of the technique, the use or the choice of the product, increasing required competence Increasing the difference between innovating people and the reluctant Notion of uses - “usage” When companies make innovating products too complex Illustration RCM : Corinne Grenier 11 How companies may learn from users (1) Notion of uses - “usage” Companies evolve in their practices in managing relationships with consumers . From KM – when companies unlock and integrate employees’ knowledge about customers, sales processes, and R&D . To CRM – when companies manage knowledge about the customer in company’s data bases . To CKM –when companies gain knowledge directly from the customer, as well as sharing and expanding this knowledge The recent innovating approach in dealing with consumers Compulsory reading . Gibbert and al (2002), “Five Styles of Customer Knowledge Management, and How Smart Companies Use Them To Create Value”, European Management Journal Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 459–469, RCM : Corinne Grenier 12 How companies may learn from users (2) Notion of uses - “usage” Companies are not all ready to incorporate ideas and what they may learn from the uses of their consumers in their innovating process – see the next page end read the article of Berthon and al (2007) Compulsory reading . Berthon and al (2007), “When customers get clever: Managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers”, Business Horizons, vol 50, p. 39-47 RCM : Corinne Grenier Notion of uses - “usage” RCM : Corinne Grenier How to integrate users into innovation process After having understanding why users and their daily uses as well as their knowledge are critical for innovating companies, we are going to examine three approaches companies mobilize. Innovation process Innovation Diffusion process Lead user Innovation process Diffusion process and improvement of innovation Users common practices Continuous Innovation process Users common practices What can be learnt from the customer? 1 2 Linux for instance RCM : Corinne Grenier 15 How to integrate users into innovation process The lead-user A concept introduced by Von Hippel (1978) : defined as an expert user, being at the ‘avant- garde’ in one field, and having an interest in the evolution of the product, The lead-user is an innovating consumer who “consumes” product during its stage of design and development within the company Lead-user can not be simply “interviewed” because his main critical thinking and competences are not really formalized. Von Hippel explains that the lead-user has got a “sticky” knowledge. Consequently, he must directly experience and to with the innovation in progress Various ways to have access to the lead-user experiences: . Direct observation in real life . Observation of life in lab (control of variables) . Integration in the development of a prototype Be careful: the lead-user is not : . Opinion leader .The ‘Innovator” of Rogers’ model RCM : Corinne Grenier 16 Sectors or firms using lead users in their innovation development process : - Salomon (ski manufacturer) - Ikea - Car manufacturer (Renault ...) - 3M - The “Kitchen lab” from Findus - Apple - EDF (National electricity provider) - “Eveil et Jeux” (club of parents lead users) How to integrate users into innovation process Some illustrations (in French) - video . L'innovation en amont - L'Approche des "Lead Users" – ZBA Compulsory readings . Rita Shor: what lead-user is . Kraustsrunk (2011), “ Innovating Like 3M With Lead User”, in Business Management The lead-user RCM : Corinne Grenier 17 How to integrate users into innovation process The lead-user Testimony: Lead User Innovation At 3M In the mid 90s, 3M realized that most of their innovations just involved incremental development to existing products. This limited the company’s competitiveness and financial performance, becoming a vicious circle. Growing the business meant a need for enabling an environment capable of delivering “serial breakthrough innovations“. 3M’s management started by setting a new goal: 30% of sales should be driven by new products. “A new method for developing breakthrough products: the lead user process. The process [...] makes the generation of breakthrough strategies, products, and services systematic.” Lead users are power users who happen to think, adapt, customize and even develop products well ahead of the commercial version. 3M worked on identifying promising savvy users and begun scheduling workshops and ethnographic research to gather their input. These are the kind of people who can help with uncovering emerging trends and solutions. “Roger Lacey, head of the company’s Telecom Systems Division [...] says: the method brings cross functional teams into close working relationships with leading-edge customers and other sources of expertise.” “Innovative product users often outnumber an individual company’s product developers.” RCM : Corinne Grenier 18 How to integrate users into innovation process The lead-user The main characteristics of lead-user been “avant-gardistes” – ahead from their time hugely creative individuals abilities to face novel ideas with strong motivation in improving the class of products concerned with the innovation process with deep expertise in their domains ; and especially expertise in the use of the products (they are consumer of the class of the products, and they have something to say from their daily practices) To go further - Non compulsory reading . Becheur et Gollety (2000), “Qui sont les Utilisateurs leaders ? Une Etude Exploratoire de leurs Caractéristiques Déterminantes », conférence . Moeini A. and al (2006), “lead-user innovation” RCM : Corinne Grenier 19 How to integrate users into innovation process The lead-user Videos: Charles Leadbeater: The era of open innovation http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/charles_leadbeater_on_innovation.html Other non compulsory reading . Cova B. et Ezan P. , “le consommateur-collaborateur: activités, attentes et impacts - le cas du passionné de warhammer”, . Chapel V. (2002), “archibal ou l’innovation par les usages”, conférence à l’Ecole de Paris RCM : Corinne Grenier 20 BtoB BtoC BtoE Communities of interests Communities of practices Vertical/ Horizontal Community of researchers Learning Healthcare Community on line « Home based uses» (family, elderly people, Young …) Production worldEconomic worldSocial world A large variety of communities => we are looking to Communties of users Hierarchical structures (project group ……) How to integrate users into innovation process Communities RCM : Corinne Grenier 21 What is Community of users: Groups of consumers having an interest of the same kind of products and who exchange themselves information ; either independent from companies or encouraged and supported by companies (commercial sites ; Amazon.com ...) Closed to the idea of “affinity group” Closed to the idea of “Brand community” when individuals get together to share commun passion for one brand Can be independent from companies or encouraged and supported by companies (e.g. Amazon.com) whenencouraged by companies: - Ability to establish dialogue with users - Ability to capitalize knowledge - BUT Ability to maintain autonomy and manage diversity; the community should be remain free to exchange information, even if unfavorable to the companies How to integrate users into innovation process Communities RCM : Corinne Grenier 22 How to integrate users into innovation process Communities A very well known, interesting and funny example: Lego Mindstorm: MIT's Eric von Hippel: Open Innovation & LEGO Mindstorms http://fora.tv/2008/04/08/MITs_Eric_von_Hippel_Open_Innovation Illustration RCM : Corinne Grenier 23 Can companies create or control communities of users ? 1) Ability to establish dialogue with users : more adequate forms of relationships to create : reactivity, capitalizing knowledge 2) Ability to mobilize consumers 3) Ability to manage diversity : 4) Ability to conceive personal experiments jointly 5) Ability to know until where to intervene (degree of instrumentalisation) How to integrate users into innovation process Communities RCM : Corinne Grenier 24 To conclude, this track largely deals with OPEN INNOVATION How to integrate users into innovation process Open innovation Notion introduced by Von Hippel as: Opening the boundaries of companies to consumers and lay people Integrating them into innovation process Catching their good ideas Non compulsory reading – to go further . Von Hippel – Democratizing Innovation RCM : Corinne Grenier 25 How to integrate partners and users to sustain usage of social innovation – the Laerdal case • Social innovation is about the AED use (semi-automatic defibrillator) that, in France, any citizen can use to restore life and prevent cardiac arrest. • In the Landes department (south west of France), some mayors decide to install AED in public places. But rapidely the question raised: installing AED in public places does not make the actual use of AED!!! • The article describes how various stakeholders (mayors and their association, firemen brigade and Laerdal, supplier of AED) progressively develop a network and change / enrich the initial innovation (AED in public place) so that to create actual use. Compulsory reading . Crespin F., Goglio-Primard K. and Grenier C. (2015): “The Dynamics of Managing Inter-Organizational Networks of Practice: Save Lives in Case of Cardiac Arrest”, Symposium on CoP, Toulon, France
Compartilhar