Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
© 2018 Yang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms. php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). Cancer Management and Research 2018:10 1219–1229 Cancer Management and Research Dovepress submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 1219 R E V I E W open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S165228 Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer Xi Yang1 Miao Da2 Wenyuan Zhang3 Quan Qi4 Chun Zhang5 Shuwen Han4 1Department of Intervention and Radiotherapy, Huzhou Central Hospital, 2Medical College of Nursing, Huzhou University, 3Department of Gynaecology, 4Department of Medical Oncology, 5Department of Infectious Diseases, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China Abstract: Cervical cancer is a common malignant cancer among women worldwide. Changes in the vaginal microecological environment lead to multiple gynecological diseases, including cervical cancer. Recent research has shown that Lactobacillus may play an important role in the occurrence and development of cervical cancer. This review explores the role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer. A total of 29 articles were included after identification and screening. The pertinent literature on Lactobacillus in cervical cancer from two perspectives, including clinical studies and experimental studies, was analyzed. An association network for the mechanism by which Lactobacillus induces cervical cancer was constructed. In addition, we provide direction and insight for further research on the role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer. Keywords: CIN, cervical cancer, Lactobacillus, microorganism Introduction Cervical cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide.1,2 Epidemiological investiga- tions have shown that the number of new cases of cervical cancer per year is ~485,000, with 236,000 deaths occurring per year globally.3 Patients with cervical cancer often exhibit no obvious symptoms and signs at early stages; thus, the disease tends to be ignored and is easily misdiagnosed. Cervical cytologic screening has generally been used to detect cervical cancer and premalignant lesions over the past decade, and early diagnosis and appropriate treatment reduce the risk of cancer-related death.4 Current research has shown that microorganisms may play an important role in the occurrence and development of cervical cancer.5 Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is now believed to be a major causal factor in the development of the disease.6 The bacteria in the vagina maintain a dynamic balance under physiological conditions, but the imbalance of vaginal flora leads to multiple gynecological diseases, such as coleitis, high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and cervical cancer.7 It has been confirmed that Gardnerella and Monilia are the main bacteria that induce coleitis.8,9 Previous research has shown that the abundance of vaginal flora such as Mycoplasma genitalium,10 aerobic lactobacilli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococci, Escherichia coli, and Bacteriodes species11 in patients with cervical cancer is different from that in healthy controls. However, the relationship between vaginal flora and cervical cancer has not yet been elucidated. Lactobacillus is a group of bacteria that can act as a catalyst to produce lactic acid during the process of glycolysis.12 This group is the predominant bacteria in the healthy vagina and plays an important role in the protection of the female reproduction Correspondence: Shuwen Han Department of Medical Oncology, Huzhou Central Hospital, No 198 Hongqi Road, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province 313000, People’s Republic of China Tel +86 572 202 3301 Email shuwenhan985@163.com Journal name: Cancer Management and Research Article Designation: REVIEW Year: 2018 Volume: 10 Running head verso: Yang et al Running head recto: Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S165228 http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com https://www.facebook.com/DoveMedicalPress/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/dove-medical-press https://twitter.com/dovepress https://www.youtube.com/user/dovepress Cancer Management and Research 2018:10submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1220 Yang et al system.13 Summarizing previous studies, Lactobacillus in the vagina exerts its protective functions mainly through the following four potential mechanisms: 1) By preventing pathogenic bacteria from adhering to the epithelial tissue: vaginal epithelial cells (VECs) of fertile woman encounter periodic changes including hyperplasia, peeling, and repair under the effect of estrogen and progestin. Free glycogen that is produced during this process supplies matter and energy for the growth of Lactobacillus. Lactobacillus is adsorbed and occupies the VECs, and these bacteria can prevent the conglutination of invasive pathogenic bacteria that induce malignant tumors.14–16 2) By secreting organic acid: Lacto- bacillus produces organic acid by decomposing glucogen to maintain the vaginal acidic environment,17 which can inhibit the growth and resist the invasion of pathogenic bacteria. In addition, the vaginal acidic environment is beneficial to maintain the activity of bacteriocins and H 2 O 2 .18 3) By secreting various metabolites: exopolysaccharides (EPSs), phosphorylated polysaccharides, and peptidoglycans, which are secreted by Lactobacillus, can inhibit the proliferation of malignant tumors.19,20 Bacteriocin and surface-active compo- nents can inhibit the production of tumorigenic substances and the growth of harmful microorganisms.21 H 2 O 2 , which is also secreted by Lactobacillus, can directly kill harmful microorganisms or act in a bactericidal manner though the peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide-halide bactericidal system.18 4) By activating the immune system: Lactobacillus affects cellular and humoral immunity. On one hand, these bacteria can increase the proliferation and differentiation of thymus- derived cells (T cells).22 On the other hand, Lactobacillus, as an immune sensitizer, can increase immunological recogni- tion and proliferation of bone marrow-derived cell (B cells).23 Lactobacillus also produces nitric oxide (NO) by stimulating macrophages and disrupting the energy metabolism of cancer cells.24 Considering the importance of lactobacilli in cervi- cal cancer, in this review, we comprehensively analyzed and classified the pertinent literature on lactobacilli in cervical cancer from two perspectives, clinical case investigations, and studies of molecular mechanisms. We also provide direction and insight for further research on intestinal flora in cervical cancer. Methods The databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for literature published up to January 10, 2018. To achieve maximum sensitivity of the search strategy and identify all studies, the following terms were combined: (“cervix uterus” or “neck of uterus” or “uterine neck” or “cervical” or “cervix” or “uterine cervical” or “uterine cervix”) and (“neoplasms” or “tumor” or “carcinoma” or “cancer” or “intraepithelial neoplasia” or “intraepithelialneoplasms”) and (“lactic acid bacteria” or “lactobacillus” or “lactobacilli” or “vagina/ vaginal flora” or “vagina/vaginal microflora” or “vagina/ vaginal microorganism” or “vagina/vaginal microbiome” or “vagina/vaginal microbiota” or “vagina/vaginal microbe” or “vagina/vaginal microbiology” or “vagina/vaginal bacteria” or “vagina/vaginal bacterium”). All relevant abstracts were independently retrieved by two authors, and the articles with available information for the present systematic review were fully reviewed. A total of 29 articles were included after identification and screening. The detailed search strategy is presented in Figure 1. Study selection Studies adhering to the following criteria were considered for inclusion: 1) those published in English and 2) those involving Lactobacillus in CIN or cervical cancer in vivo or in vitro. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) letters, case reports, reviews, or conference reports; 2) the main studies not focused on the topic of vaginal Lactobacillus in CIN or cervical cancer; and 3) correlation clinical studies with a low quality score according to the Grading of Rec- ommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method.25 Results CIN, which is considered to be a precancerous lesion of the cervix,26 was included in the present study. After identifica- tion, screening, and validation, we identified a total of 29 pertinent studies related to Lactobacillus and several of its subgenera in cervical cancer and precancerous lesions of the cervix published in recent years. The 29 pertinent stud- ies were divided into two groups that comprised 14 clinical studies in one group and 15 experimental studies in the other group. The clinical studies and experimental studies are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. As shown in Table 1, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was the main method used to detect microbial community structure and relative abundance. The presence of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in women was associated with a high relative abundance of Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus sp and low relative abundance of Lactobacillus jensenii and Lactobacillus crispatus. Two investigations revealed that the abundance of Lactobacillus in women with human papil- lomavirus (HPV) infection was lower (panel numbers 6 and 10). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1221 Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer showed that an oral lactobacilli (panel number 11) and an HR-HPV E7-expressing Lactobacillus-based vaccine (panel number 8) were able to decrease the risk of CIN. Moreover, two randomized controlled trial studies (panel numbers 12 and 13) supported the hypothesis that LC9018 (a biological response modifier prepared from heat-killed Lactobacillus casei YTT9018) was able to protect patients from radiation- induced leukopenia with few side effects. As shown in Table 2, cancer cell and animal models were used along with molecular biology techniques such as the cell counting kit-8 assay, Western blots, immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to study the role of Lactobacillus and several subgenera in cervical cancer. The results showed that Lactobacillus, its subgenera, and their supernatants exhibited antimetastatic and antiproliferative activities in cervical cancer cell lines by regulating cancer-related genes and eliciting an immunological response. Lactobacillus inhibited the viability of cervical can- cer cells through regulating HPV oncogenes (panel numbers 1 and 6), and HPV-type 16 E7 protein displayed on lactobacillus could protect against HPV-induced tumors through regulating cellular immunity (panel numbers 10–14). In particular, a nega- tive result showed that L. casei extract was not able to inhibit the viability of cervical cancer cells in vitro (panel number 7). As shown in Figure 2, a network of the mechanisms of Lacto- bacillus in cervical cancer was constructed to better visualize the theory behind the experimental studies. Discussion The vaginal microecological balance is dynamic and relative, and patients are able to recover from slight vaginal dysbac- teriosis. The persistence of vaginal dysbacteriosis is thought to promote gynecological cancer.7,27 A decline in the quan- tity and activity of Lactobacillus leads to an overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria.28 Deleterious metabolites such as nitrous acid can be produced by these organisms, and the risk of HPV infection also increases.29 Persistent infection of oncogenic HPV is a cause of cervical cancer.6 The abundance of Lac- tobacillus in HPV infection is lower, and HPV oncogenes may be involved in regulation of the viability of cervical cancer cells inhibited by Lactobacillus. CIN, precancerous lesions of the cervix, is much more likely to occur with dys- bacteriosis. Thus, the regulation and control of Lactobacillus may block the progression of cervical cancer. The present study attempts to clarify the cross-talk between Lactobacillus and cervical cancer using both clinical and experimental studies by reviewing the pertinent litera- ture. Experimental study can lay an important foundation for Figure 1 Literature search strategy. Notes: Databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for literature published up to January 10, 2018. A total of 29 studies including 17 clinical studies and 14 experimental studies were included after identification and screening. Abbreviation: CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. PubMed (n=130) Id en tif ic at io n S cr ee ni ng E lig ib ili ty In cl ud ed Embase (n=89) Cochrane (n=10) Records excluded (n=21): 1. Reviews, case reports: (n=16) 2. Low quality score: (n=5) 66 Articles excluded, with reasons: 1. Not involving CIN or cervical cancer (n=21) 2. Not involving vaginal lactobacillus (n=39) 3. Paper without using English (n=6) Records after duplicates removed (n=118) Records screened (n=97) Full-text articles assessed for eligibility (n=31) Studies included (n=31) Experimental studies (n=14) Clinical studies (n=17) www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1222 Yang et al T ab le 1 C lin ic al s tu di es o f L ac to ba cil lu s in c er vi ca l c an ce r N um be r Y ea r A ut ho rs N um be r of w om en e nr ol le d R ac e or r eg io n Su bg en er a of La ct ob ac ill us M et ho ds D is ea se s Fi nd in gs R ef er en ce 1 20 16 Pi ya th ila ke et a l Pa tie nt s w ith C IN 1 (n =9 0) , C IN 2 (n =2 08 ), an d C IN 3 (n =1 32 ) Bi rm in gh am , A L, U SA La ct ob ac illu s re ut er i a nd s ev er al su b- ge nu s le ve l 16 S rR N A s eq ue nc in g C IN T he c er vi ca l m uc os al C T d om in at ed b y L. in er s an d un cl as si fie d La ct ob ac illu s sp p w as as so ci at ed w ith C IN 2+ ( O R = 3. 48 ; 9 5% C I, 1. 27 –9 .5 5) . 45 2 20 16 Se o et a l Pa tie nt s w ith C IN (n =6 5) a nd c on tr ol (n =7 2) So ut h K or ea L. c ris pa tu s an d L. in er s 16 S rR N A g en e se qu en ci ng , a fo od -fr eq ue nc y qu es tio nn ai re a nd m ul tiv ar ia bl e lo gi st ic re gr es si on a na ly si s C IN D ie t ch ar ac te ri ze d by L . i ne rs -d om in an t ty pe h ad a h ig he r ri sk o f C IN , c om pa re d w ith t he L . c ris pa tu s- do m in an t ty pe 46 3 20 15 M itr a et a l C on trol ( n= 20 ), LS IL ( n= 52 ), H SI L (n =9 2) , a nd c er vi ca l ca nc er ( n= 5) . C au ca si an , A si an , an d Bl ac k L. je ns en ii 16 S rR N A g en e se qu en ci ng LS IL , H SI L, a nd IC C In cr ea si ng d is ea se s ev er ity w as a ss oc ia te d w ith d ec re as in g re la tiv e ab un da nc e of La ct ob ac illu s sp p. T he v ag in al m ic ro bi om e in H SI L w as c ha ra ct er iz ed b y lo w er le ve ls o f L. je ns en ii (P <0 .0 1) c om pa re d to L SI L 47 4 20 15 O h et a l W om en ( n= 70 ) an d co nt ro l ( n= 50 ) So ut h K or ea L. in er s an d L. cr isp at us 16 S rR N A g en e se qu en ci ng C IN A p re do m in an ce o f L . i ne rs w ith a co nc om ita nt p au ci ty o f L . c ris pa tu s in t he ce rv ic al m ic ro bi ot a w as a ss oc ia te d w ith C IN r is k 48 5 20 15 M itr a et a l C on tr ol ( n= 20 ), LS IL ( n= 52 ), H SI L (n =9 2) , a nd c an ce r (n =5 ). C au ca si an , A si an , an d Bl ac k. La ct ob ac illu s 16 S rR N A g en e se qu en ci ng C IN W om en w ith C IN h av e a m or e di ve rs e La ct ob ac illu s de pl et ed v ag in al m ic ro bi om e, co m pa re d to n or m al w om en 49 6 20 15 K w as ni ew sk i W oj ci ec h et a l W om en Eu ro pe an La ct ob ac illu s 16 S rR N A g en e se qu en ci ng LS IL a nd H SI L La ct ob ac illu s sp p ar e th e pr ed om in an t ba ct er ia in t he h ea lth y ce rv ix , H PV n eg at iv e w om en b ut t he re is lo w a bu nd an ce o f la ct ob ac ill us in w om en w ith L SI L H PV ( +) 50 7 20 14 Si lv a et a l Pa tie nt s w ith ev ol ut io n (2 14 ) an d w ith ou t ev ol ut io n (n =1 97 0) Br az ili an ; G yn ec ol og y an d O bs te tr ic s D ep ar tm en t at a pu bl ic t er tia ry -le ve l un iv er si ty h os pi ta l be tw ee n 19 95 a nd 20 00 La ct ob ac illu s sp R et ro sp ec tiv e st ud y an d m ul tiv ar ia bl e lo gi st ic r eg re ss io n an al ys is In tr ae pi th el ia l le si on s; c er vi ca l ca nc er La ct ob ac illu s sp w as r is k fa ct or a ss oc ia te d w ith e vo lu tio n fr om in tr ae pi th el ia l l es io n an d in va si ve n eo pl as ia 51 8 20 14 K aw an a et a l Pa tie nt s w ith C IN 3 (n =1 7) Ja pa ne se w om en ; Ja pa n La ct ob ac illu s ca se i EL IS PO T a ss ay C IN O ra l a dm in is tr at io n of a n E7 -e xp re ss in g La ct ob ac illu s- ba se d va cc in e ca n el ic it E7 - sp ec ifi c m uc os al im m un ity in t he c er vi x of C IN 3 pa tie nt s 52 www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1223 Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer 9 20 13 R oc ha e t al Pa tie nt s w ith pr en eo pl as tic a nd ne op la st ic c er vi ca l ut er in e le si on s (n =6 25 ) Pu bl ic h ea lth ca re s er vi ce s in D iv in op ol is c ou nt y, M in as G er ai s st at e, Br az il La ct ob ac illu s PC R Pr en eo pl as tic a nd ne op la st ic c er vi ca l ut er in e le si on s La ct ob ac illu s sp w as t he m os t fr eq ue nt m ic ro or ga ni sm ( 65 % ) in t he p at ie nt s w ith pr en eo pl as tic a nd n eo pl as tic c er vi ca l ut er in e le si on s 53 10 20 13 D ar en g et a l W om en ( n= 27 8) N ig er ia n; A bu ja , N ig er ia La ct ob ac illu s 16 S rD N A g en e se qu en ci ng , R oc he Li ne ar A rr ay (R ) H PV ge no ty pi ng t es t an d lo gi st ic r eg re ss io n m od el s W om en w ith o r w ith ou t H R -H PV in fe ct io n Lo w r el at iv e ab un da nc e of L ac to ba cil lu s sp p is in 5 0% o f H PV in fe ct io n 54 11 20 12 O u et a l W om en w er e ra nd om iz ed t o or al la ct ob ac ill i ( n= 40 ) an d or al p la ce bo (n =4 0) C hi ne se ; T ai w an , C hi na La ct ob ac ill i H PV t es t, pa p sm ea r, an d va gi na l g ra m st ai n; r an do m iz ed , do ub le -b lin d, p la ce bo - co nt ro lle d st ud y H ig h- ri sk H PV in fe ct io n; C IN C om pa ri ng w ith w om en in o ra l l ac to ba ci lli gr ou p, w om en in t he p la ce bo g ro up h ad a si gn ifi ca nt h ig he r pe rc en ta ge o f s ub se qu en t C IN le si on d ur in g fo llo w -u p 55 12 19 93 O ka w a et a l Pa tie nt s w ith s ta ge III B ce rv ic al c an ce r (n =2 28 ) Sp an is h; 50 in st itu tio ns , Sp ai n La ct ob ac illu s ca se i R an do m iz ed co nt ro lle d tr ia l C er vi ca l c an ce r of st ag e III B LC 90 18 ( a bi ol og ic al r es po ns e m od ifi er pr ep ar ed fr om h ea t- ki lle d La ct ob ac illu s ca se i Y T T 90 18 ) co ul d pr ot ec t th e pa tie nt s fr om r ad ia tio n- in du ce d le uk op en ia d ur in g ra di ot he ra py w ith fe w s id e ef fe ct s 56 13 19 89 O ka w a et a l Pa tie nt s w ith s ta ge IIB o r III c er vi ca l ca nc er ( n= 61 ) Ja pa ne se ; D ep ar tm en t of R ad io lo gy , T ok yo W om en ’s M ed ic al C ol le ge , T ok yo , Ja pa n La ct ob ac illu s ca se i R an do m iz ed co nt ro lle d tr ia l C er vi ca l c an ce r of st ag e IIB o r III LC 90 18 e nh an ce d th e th er ap eu tic e ffe ct of t he ir ra di at io n. L C 90 18 c ou ld p ro te ct th e pa tie nt s fr om le uk op en ia d ur in g ra di ot he ra py 57 14 19 78 M ea d Pa tie nt s w ith in va si ve c er vi ca l ca nc er ( n= 21 ) A m er ic an ; D ep ar tm en t of O bs te tr ic s an d G yn ec ol og y at th e U ni ve rs ity o f V er m on t C ol le ge of M ed ic in e, Bu rl in gt on , V T , U SA A er ob ic la ct ob ac ill i Ba ct er ia is ol at io n an d pu ri fic at io n C er vi ca l c an ce r Pa tie nt s w ith c er vi ca l c an ce r ha ve a de cr ea se d fr eq ue nc y of is ol at io n of a er ob ic la ct ob ac ill i 11 N ot es : C er vi ca l c an ce r an d pr ec an ce ro us le si on s in w om en w er e as so ci at ed w ith h ig h re la tiv e ab un da nc e of L ac to ba cil lu s an d se ve ra l o f i ts s ub ge ne ra . O ra l l ac to ba ci lli ( pa ne l n um be r 11 ) an d an E 7- ex pr es si ng L ac to ba cil lu s- ba se d va cc in e (p an el n um be r 8) w er e ab le t o de cr ea se t he r is k of C IN . L C 90 18 p ro te ct ed p at ie nt s fr om r ad ia tio n- in du ce d le uk op en ia w ith fe w s id e ef fe ct s. A bb re vi at io ns : C C K -8 , c el l c ou nt in g ki t- 8; C IN , c er vi ca l i nt ra ep ith el ia l n eo pl as ia ; C T , c om m un ity ty pe ; H PV , h um an p ap ill om av ir us ; H R -H PV , h ig h- ri sk H PV ; H SI L, h ig h- gr ad e sq ua m ou s in tr ae pi th el ia l l es io n;IC C , i nv as iv e ce rv ic al c an ce r; L. c ris pa tu s, La ct ob ac illu s cr isp at us ; L . i ne rs , L ac to ba cil lu s in er s; L. je ns en ii, La ct ob ac illu s je ns en ii; L SI L, lo w -g ra de s qu am ou s in tr ae pi th el ia l l es io n; P C R , p ol ym er as e ch ai n re ac tio n. www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1224 Yang et al T ab le 2 E xp er im en ta l s tu di es o f L ac to ba cil lu s in c er vi ca l c an ce r N um be r Y ea r A ut ho rs E xp er im en ta l a ni m al an d ce ll m od el Su bg en er a of La ct ob ac ill us M et ho ds D is ea se s Fi nd in gs R ef er en ce 1 20 17 W an g et a l C aS ki c el ls L. c ris pa tu s, L. je ns en ii, an d L. g as se ri M T T a ss ay , fl ow c yt om et ry , an d PC R C er vi ca l ca nc er Su pe rn at an ts o f L . c ris pa tu s, L. je ns en ii, an d L. g as se ri ha ve in hi bi to ry e ffe ct s on t he v ia bi lit y of c er vi ca l ca nc er c el ls v ia r eg ul at io n of H PV o nc og en es a nd ce ll cy cl e- re la te d ge ne s 43 2 20 17 Li e t al H eL a an d U 14 c el l l in es an d X en og ra ft m ou se La ct ob ac ill i C C K -8 , W es te rn b lo t, an d im m un oh is to ch em is tr y C er vi ca l ca nc er La ct ob ac ill i i nh ib it th e m ig ra to ry a bi lit y of c er vi ca l ca nc er c el l l in es a nd t he u pr eg ul at io n of E -c ad he ri n m ay b e in vo lv ed in t he m ol ec ul e m ec ha ni sm 58 3 20 17 Su ng ur e t al W om en , c er vi ca l c an ce r ce ll an d C ac o- 2 ce ll lin es L. g as se ri st ra in s H PL C , W ST -1 c el l pr ol ife ra tio n as sa y, E LI SA , an d PC R C er vi ca l ca nc er EP Ss o f L . g as se ri st ra in s is ol at ed fr om h um an v ag in a in du ce a po pt os is in H eL a ce lls b y as so ci at in g w ith a n up re gu la tio n of B ax a nd C as pa se 3 44 4 20 17 Ja ng e t al T h1 7 ce lls a nd H eL a ce ll lin es La ct ob ac illu s rh am no su s H N 00 1 (L 1) a nd La ct ob ac illu s ac id op hi lu s La -1 4 (L 2) En zy m e- lin ke d im m un os po t as sa y, im m un ob lo tt in g, P C R , an d flo w c yt om et ry C er vi ca l ca nc er La ct ob ac illu s rh am no su s H N 00 1 (L 1) a nd L ac to ba cil lu s ac id op hi lu s La -1 4 (L 2) in hi bi te d th e ad he re nc e of G ar dn er el la v ag in al is to c er vi ca l c an ce r ce lls 59 5 20 16 N ou ri e t al H eL a ce ll lin es LR S an d LC S M T T a ss ay a nd P C R C er vi ca l ca nc er LR S an d LC S ha ve a nt im et as ta tic a nd an tip ro lif er at iv e ac tiv iti es o n H eL a ce ll lin es 60 6 20 16 M ot ev as el i et a l H eL a ce lls L. c ris pa tu s an d La ct ob ac illu s rh am no su s PC R C er vi ca l ca nc er L. c ris pa tu s an d La ct ob ac illu s rh am no su s cu ltu re su pe rn at an ts c an d ec re as e th e ex pr es si on o f A T G 14 an d BE C N 1 as w el l a s th e H PV E 6 on co ge ne in H eL a ce lls 61 7 20 15 K im e t al C aS ki a nd H eL a ce ll lin es La ct ob ac illu s ca se i Fl ow c yt om et ry C er vi ca l ca nc er La ct ob ac illu s ca se i e xt ra ct c an no t in hi bi t th e vi ab ili ty of c er vi ca l c an ce r ce lls o r th e gr ow th o f c an ce r ce lls in t he p re se nc e of a nt ic an ce r dr ug s in v itr o 62 8 20 14 N am i e t al W om en ; H eL a ce ll lin es an d H U V EC n or m al c el ls La ct ob ac illu s pl an ta ru m 16 S rD N A g en e se qu en ci ng , di sk d iff us io n an tib io tic su sc ep tib ili ty t es t, M T T as sa y, D A PI s ta in in g m et ho d, an d flo w c yt om et ry C er vi ca l ca nc er La ct ob ac illu s pl an ta ru m 5 BL , w hi ch is is ol at ed fr om va gi na l s ec re tio ns o f a do le sc en t an d yo un g ad ul t w om en , e xh ib its d es ir ab le p ro bi ot ic p ro pe rt ie s an d re m ar ka bl e an tic an ce r ac tiv ity a ga in st t he H eL a ce ll lin es w ith n o si gn ifi ca nt c yt ot ox ic e ffe ct s on H U V EC no rm al c el ls 63 9 20 13 M ot ev as el i et a l H um an n or m al fi br ob la st - lik e ce rv ic al ( no rm al ce rv ic al ) an d H eL a (c er vi ca l t um or ) ce lls L. g as se ri an d L. c ris pa tu s M T T a ss ay , T ry pa n bl ue s ta in in g, la ct at e de hy dr og en as e as sa y, co lo ri m et ri c ca sp as e- 3 ac tiv ity a ss ay , a nd P C R C er vi ca l ca nc er L. g as se ri an d L. c ris pa tu s ex er t cy to to xi c ef fe ct s on c er vi ca l t um or c el ls a nd t hi s cy to to xi ci ty is in de pe nd en t of p H a nd la ct at e 64 10 20 13 R ib el le s et a l M ic e, in br ed C 57 BL La ct oc oc cu s la ct is an d L. c as ei C el l s ur fa ce d is pl ay te ch ni qu es C er vi ca l ca nc er E7 -e xp re ss in g LA B, a s a m uc os al li ve v ac ci ne , pr ot ec ts a ga in st H PV -t yp e 16 -in du ce d tu m or s in m ic e 65 11 20 10 Le e et a l M ic e L. c as ei En zy m e- lin ke d im m un os po t as sa y C er vi ca l ca nc er O ra l L . c as ei b ea ri ng t he s ur fa ce -d is pl ay ed E 6 pr ot ei n in du ce s T -c el l-m ed ia te d ce llu la r im m un ity a nd an tit um or e ffe ct s in m ic e 22 www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1225 Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer 12 20 10 A da ch i e t al C 57 BL /6 m ic e L. c as ei Fl ow c yt om et ry C er vi ca l ca nc er L. c as ei -P gs A -E 7 (H PV -t yp e 16 E 7 pr ot ei n di sp la ye d on la ct ob ac ill us ) ca n im pr ov e T c el ls w ith s pe ci fic m uc os al E 7- ty pe 1 im m un e re sp on se s an d in du ce m uc os al c yt ot ox ic c el lu la r im m un e re sp on se s 66 13 20 06 Po o et a l M ic e L. c as ei W es te rn b lo t, flo w cy to m et ry , a nd im m un ofl uo re sc en ce m ic ro sc op y C er vi ca l ca nc er O ra l a dm in is tr at io n of L . c as ei -P gs A -E 7( H PV -t yp e 16 E7 p ro te in d is pl ay ed o n la ct ob ac ill us ) in du ce s E7 - sp ec ifi c an tit um or e ffe ct s in C 57 /B L6 m ic e 67 14 20 06 A ir es e t al M ic e L. c as ei W es te rn b lo tt in g, e le ct ro n m ic ro sc op y an al ys is , im m un ofl uo re sc en ce , im m un os or be nt a ss ay , an d en zy m e- lin ke d im m un os or be nt a ss ay C er vi ca l ca nc er H PV -t yp e 16 L 1 vi ru s- lik e pa rt ic le s by r ec om bi na nt L. c as ei c el ls a re t he p ro m is in g va cc in e ag ai ns t H PV - 16 infe ct io n 68 15 19 99 M cN ic ol e t al C aS ki c ar ci no m a ce ll lin e La ct ob ac illu s ac id op hi lu s PC R a nd q ua nt ita tiv e cu ltu re C IN ; H PV 16 in fe ct io n Is ol at io n of L ac to ba cil lu s sp ( P= 0. 05 ) is a ss oc ia te d w ith lo w -g ra de C IN o r no rm al h is to lo gy 69 N ot es : C an ce r ce ll an d an im al m od el s an d m ol ec ul ar b io lo gy te ch ni qu es w er e us ed to s tu dy th e ro le o f L ac to ba cil lu s an d se ve ra l o f i ts s ub ge ne ra in c er vi ca l c an ce r. L ac to ba cil lu s, se ve ra l s ub ge ne ra , a nd th ei r su pe rn at an ts h ad a nt im et as ta tic an d an tip ro lif er at iv e ef fe ct s in c er vi ca l c an ce r ce ll lin es b y re gu la tin g ca nc er -r el at ed g en es a nd e lic iti ng a n im m un ol og ic al r es po ns e. A bb re vi at io ns : D A PI , 1 4′ ,6 -d ia m id in o- 2- ph en yl in do le ; E LI SA , e nz ym e- lin ke d im m un os or be nt a ss ay ; E PS s, e xo po ly sa cc ha ri de s; H PV , h um an p ap ill om av ir us ; L . c as ei , L ac to ba cil lu s c as ei ; L . c ris pa tu s, La ct ob ac illu s c ris pa tu s; L. g as se ri, L ac to ba cil lu s ga ss er i; L. je ns en ii, La ct ob ac illu s je ns en ii; L A B, la ct ic a ci d ba ct er ia ; L C S, L . c ris pa tu s su pe rn at an t; LR S, L ac to ba cil lu s rh am no su s su pe rn at an t. further clinical study, and clinical study can be the reliable test of experimental study. Lactobacillus as a probiotic is characterized by fewer side effects and can be used as oral preparation. The signal peptide of S-layer on monolayer cell membrane of Lactobacillus is easy to combine with the exogenous target protein. These characteristics determine the Lactobacillus as a desired vector for recombinant pro- tein vaccine and, moreover, Lactobacillus in vaginal flora as protection against HPV-related disease. Thus, the use of Lactobacillus as a vector to construct the HPV-related protein vaccine can achieve admirable antitumor effects in clinical practice. Many clinical studies found that a decline in the quantity and activity of Lactobacillus was involved in the initiation and progression of cervical cancer, which provides a novel insight into the use of probiotics to prevent cervical can- cer.47,54,58 Some experimental studies found that Lactobacil- lus and its metabolites inhibit the proliferation of cervical cancer cells by regulating cancer-related genes or through an immunological mechanism. These studies provide a theo- retical basis for further clinical application of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer. Lactobacillus and its metabolites, which are used as treat- ments as well as prophylactic agents, have unique advantages. Lactobacillus as a vaginal parasitical bacterium has a lower toxicity and fewer side effects compared to other bacteria. It acts mainly by regulating the microecological environ- ment and, compared to other bacteria, is less susceptible to resistance.30 Lactobacillus and its metabolites are efficacious and superior in clinical applications for the prevention of cervical cancer.31 In addition to cervical cancer, Lactobacillus is associated with the proliferation and regulation of cells of other cancer types, such as breast cancer,32 colorectal cancer,33 gastric cancer,34 and oral cancer.35,36 Observations in these other cancers may offer insights into the study of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer. The main observations regarding Lactobacil- lus in cancers are as follows: 1) Lactobacillus can activate and strengthen the antitumor effects of immunocytes such as thymus-derived cells (T cells), natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and macrophages and immunological factors produced by immunocytes;37–39 2) a large amount of unmethylated dinucleotide repeat sequences present in the nuclei of Lactobacillus can activate the innate immune response by binding to a specific receptor that exists on the surface of human cells;40 3) Lactobacillus that is suitable for reproduction and growth in an anaerobic environment can selectively accumulate in the hypoxic zones of solid cancers;41 www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1226 Yang et al and 4) Lactobacillus can selectively locate to solid cancers and can be used as a vector for gene therapy and targeted therapies.35 The diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer have been advanced considerably in recent years, but there is still a long way to go in regard to cancer prevention. This review cannot include some unpublished research or ongoing studies. There is also a lack of large-scale multicenter clinical trials and clinical prospective cohort studies in the literature. A perfect theory cannot be constructed for the mechanism of action of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer. Vaginal Lactobacillus and its metabolites may provide a novel insight into the prevention of cervical cancer. Thus, we put forth some future directions for further study. Figure 2 Network illustrating the effects of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer. Note: An association network for Lactobacillus in cervical cancer was constructed based on the analysis of experimental studies and allows improved visualization of these studies. Abbreviations: HPV, human papillomavirus; L. acidophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus; L. casei, Lactobacillus casei; L. crispatus, Lactobacillus crispatus; L. gasseri, Lactobacillus gasseri; L. jensenii, Lactobacillus jensenii; L. lactis, Lactobacillus lactis; L. plantarum, Lactobacillus plantarum; L. rhamnosus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Lactobacillus L. gasseri HPV-16 L1 capsid protein HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein HP V-1 6 E 7 onc opr ote in L. l act is a nd L. c ase i L. gasseriand L. crispatus Vagina 8 Se cr et e Secrete Inhibit proliferation 65 65 63 62 61 61 45 60 60 70 L. casei Vaccine U pregulate E-cadherin Inhibit m igration In du ce s ap op to si s 44, 62, 63 Supernatant Inhibit migration and proliferation Inhibit cell adherence Att en ua te L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L.gasseri L. rhamnosus and L. acidophilus Induce autophagy U pre gu lat e 63 Vagina L. plan tarum 5BL 67, 68 , 69 Va cci ne L. casei 23 23 66 In du ce s ap op to si s Exopolysaccharides Se cr et e 45 45 Ga rdn ere lla va gin alis Bax and c aspa se 3U pr eg ul at e Vaccine CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cells ATG14 and BECN1 Future directions Elucidate the role of vaginal Lactobacillus in cervical cancer Lactobacillus is the dominant bacteria in the vagina and affects the growth of other bacteria.42 There appears to be a complex relationship between cervical cancer and vaginal Lactobacillus. However, many problems deserve further con- sideration. How do the community structure and diversity of Lactobacillus vary with differences in race, region, lifestyle, and diet? How does Lactobacillus drive the occurrence and development of cervical cancer? What is the role of Lacto- bacillus metabolites in balancing vaginal microecology and the development of cervical cancer? www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1227 Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer Elucidate the immunological functions mediated by vaginal Lactobacillus in cervical cancer Immunotherapy provides a broad perspective for the treat- ment of cancers. Vaginal Lactobacillus and its metabolites do affect theimmune system in cervical cancer.22 Though much effort has been made into understanding the mecha- nisms of this effect, many bottlenecks must be addressed before stepping from the imbalanced vaginal microecological system to the immune system to cervical cancer genesis and development. Lactobacillus is an easily available probiotic that is safe and has no side effects or toxicity. The envelope of Lactobacillus is often used as a carrier to express an alternative antigen for vaccines, which may provide a novel idea for the primary prevention of cervical cancer. A cervical cancer vaccine based on Lactobacillus with an HPV vaccine promises to be a new method for the prevention of cervical cancer. Prospective studies on cervical cancer incidence after intervention with the Lactobacillus vaccine should be performed. Elucidate the molecular mechanism by which Lactobacillus inhibits cervical cancer Lactobacillus inhibits the proliferation of cells from multiple cancer types. Most studies have focused on the relationship between Lactobacillus and cancer, but the mechanisms underlying this relationship have yet to be clarified. Many enzymes and peptides and the lactic acid secreted by Lacto- bacillus are involved in activating and regulating important signaling molecules and pathways in cervical cancer.43,44 It is necessary to elucidate the specific molecular mechanism or construct the molecular regulatory network in future research. Lactobacillus acts as a valuable cloning vector and is cur- rently mainly used as a plasmid vector for the experimental research of cancer in vitro. This use may suggest additional therapeutic use as a carrier to express antioncogenes or encapsulated anticarcinogens in the future. In light of the importance of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer, much attention has been paid to the study of vagi- nal microecology in recent years. Lactobacillus has shown tremendous promise for the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer. However, knowledge of vaginal microecol- ogy and Lactobacillus is far from complete. More research will be required before clinical application of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer is achieved. Acknowledgment This work was supported by the Huzhou Public Welfare Technology Application Research Program (2016GYB14). Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Lv L, Wang X. MicroRNA-296 targets specificity protein 1 to suppress cell proliferation and invasion in cervical cancer. Oncol Res. Epub 2017 Dec 14. 2. Yang PM, Chou CJ, Tseng SH, Hung CF. Bioinformatics and in vitro experimental analyses identify the selective therapeutic potential of interferon gamma and apigenin against cervical squamous cell carci- noma and adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(28):46145–46162. 3. Musa J, Achenbach CJ, O’Dwyer LC, et al. Effect of cervical cancer edu- cation and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183924. 4. Yang J, Nolte FS, Chajewski OS, et al. Cytology and high risk HPV testing in cervical cancer screening program: outcome of 3-year follow- up in an academic institute. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;46(1):22–27. 5. Chase D, Goulder A, Zenhausern F, Monk B, Herbst-Kralovetz M. The vaginal and gastrointestinal microbiomes in gynecologic cancers: a review of applications in etiology, symptoms and treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):190–200. 6. Hillemanns P, Soergel P, Hertel H, Jentschke M. Epidemiology and early detection of cervical cancer. Oncol Res Treat. 2016;39(9):501–506. 7. Yue XA, Chen P, Tang Y, Wu X, Hu Z. The dynamic changes of vaginal microecosystem in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal can- didiasis: a retrospective study of 800 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(6):1285–1294. 8. Grmek KI, Dermota U, Golle A. Frequency of detection of Gardnerella vaginalis in vaginal smears in the upper Carniola region. Acta Derma- tovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2016;25(2):31–33. 9. Sierra LJ, Brown AG, Barilá GO, et al. Colonization of the cervicovagi- nal space with Gardnerella vaginalis leads to local inflammation and cervical remodeling in pregnant mice. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191524. 10. Adebamowo SN, Ma B, Zella D, et al; ACCME Research Group. Myco- plasma hominis and Mycoplasma genitalium in the vaginal microbiota and persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Front Public Health. 2017;5:140. 11. Mead PB. Cervical-vaginal flora of women with invasive cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1978;52(5):601–604. 12. Vaneechoutte M. Lactobacillus iners, the unusual suspect. Res Micro- biol. 2017;168(9–10):826–836. 13. Smith WL, Hedges SR, Mordechai E, et al. Cervical and vaginal flora specimens are highly concordant with respect to bacterial vaginosis- associated organisms and commensal Lactobacillus species in women of reproductive age. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(8):3078–3081. 14. Nasioudis D, Forney LJ, Schneider GM, et al. The composition of the vaginal microbiome in first trimester pregnant women influences the level of autophagy and stress in vaginal epithelial cells. J Reprod Immunol. 2017;123:35–39. 15. Niu XX, Li T, Zhang X, Wang SX, Liu ZH. Lactobacillus crispatus modulates vaginal epithelial cell innate response to Candida albicans. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(3):273–279. 16. Younes JA, Klappe K, Kok JW, Busscher HJ, Reid G, van der Mei HC. Vaginal epithelial cells regulate membrane adhesiveness to coordinate bacterial adhesion. Cell Microbiol. 2015;18(4):605–614. 17. Medina-Colorado AA, Vincent KL, Miller AL, et al. Vaginal ecosystem modeling of growth patterns of anaerobic bacteria in microaerophilic conditions. Anaerobe. 2017;45:10–18. www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress 1228 Yang et al 18. Sgibnev AV, Kremleva EA. Vaginal protection by H 2 O 2 -producing lactobacilli. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(10):e22913. 19. Zadravec P, Štrukelj B, Berlec A. Improvement of LysM-mediated surface display of designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) in recombinant and nonrecombinant strains of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(6):2098–2106. 20. Homburg C, Bommer M, Wuttge S, et al. Inducer exclusion in Fir- micutes: insights into the regulation of a carbohydrate ATP binding cassette transporter from Lactobacillus casei BL23 by the signal transducing protein P-Ser46-HPr. Mol Microbiol. 2017;105(1):25–45. 21. Wang S, Wang Q, Yang E, Yan L, Li T, Zhuang H. Antimicrobial compounds produced by vaginal Lactobacillus crispatus are able to strongly inhibit Candida albicans growth, hyphal formation and regulate virulence-related gene expressions. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:564. 22. Lee TY, Kim YH, Lee KS, et al. Human papillomavirus type 16 E6-specific antitumor immunity is induced by oral administration of HPV16 E6-expressing Lactobacillus casei in C57BL/6 mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59(11):1727–1737. 23. Yao XY, Yuan MM, Li DJ. Molecular adjuvant C3d3 improved the anti- hCGbeta humoral immune response in vaginal inoculation with live recombinant Lactobacillus expressing hCGbeta-C3d3 fusion protein. Vaccine. 2007;25(32):6129–6139. 24. Sandes S, Alvim L, Silva B, et al. Selection of new lactic acid bac- teria strains bearing probiotic features from mucosal microbiota of healthy calves: looking for immunobiotics through in vitro and in vivo approaches for immunoprophylaxis applications. Microbiol Res. 2017;200(1):1–13. 25. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490. 26. Wilting SM, Steenbergen RDM. Molecular events leading to HPV- induced high grade neoplasia. Papillomavirus Res. 2016;2:85–88. 27. Overman BA. The vagina as an ecologicsystem. Current understanding and clinical applications. J Nurse Midwifery. 1993;38(3):146–151. 28. Di Paola M, Sani C, Clemente AM, et al. Characterization of cervico- vaginal microbiota in women developing persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):10200. 29. Sowjanya AP, Rao M, Vedantham H, et al. Correlation of plasma nitrite/nitrate levels and inducible nitric oxide gene expression among women with cervical abnormalities and cancer. Nitric Oxide. 2016;52: 21–28. 30. Collins SL, McMillan AM, Seney S, et al. Evaluation of lactitol, lactulose, raffinose, and oligofructose for maintenance of a Lactobacil- lus-dominated vaginal microbiota establishes a promising prebiotic can- didate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;84(8):AEM.02200–AEM.02217. 31. Champer M, Wong AM, Champer J, et al. The role of the vagi- nal microbiome in gynaecological cancer. BJOG. 2017;125(3): 309–315. 32. Marschalek J, Farr A, Marschalek ML, et al. Influence of orally administered probiotic Lactobacillus strains on vaginal microbiota in women with breast cancer during chemotherapy: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded pilot study. Breast Care (Basel). 2017;12(5):335–339. 33. Jacouton E, Chain F, Sokol H, Langella P, Bermúdez-Humarán LG. Probiotic strain Lactobacillus casei BL23 prevents colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1553. 34. Rasouli BS, Ghadimi-Darsajini A, Nekouian R, Iragian GR. In vitro activity of probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri against gastric cancer progres- sion by downregulation of urokinase plasminogen activator/urokinase plasminogen activator receptor gene expression. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(2):246–251. 35. Asoudeh-Fard A, Barzegari A, Dehnad A, Bastani S, Golchin A, Omidi Y. Lactobacillus plantarum induces apoptosis in oral cancer KB cells through upregulation of PTEN and downregulation of MAPK signalling pathways. Bioimpacts. 2017;7(3):193–198. 36. Cheng Z, Xu H, Wang X, Liu Z. Lactobacillus raises in vitro anticancer effect of geniposide in HSC-3 human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(5):4586–4594. 37. Klimek R, Klimek M, Jasiczek D. Immunotherapy of cervical cancer as a biological dissipative structure. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2011;32(4):380–388. 38. Mohamadzadeh M, Klaenhammer TR. Specific Lactobacillus species differentially activate toll-like receptors and downstream signals in dendritic cells. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7(8):1155–1164. 39. Takeda K, Okumura K. Effects of a fermented milk drink containing Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota on the human NK-cell activity. J Nutr. 2007;137(2):791S–793S. 40. Kitazawa H, Watanabe H, Shimosato T, Kawai Y, Itoh T, Saito T. Immunostimulatory oligonucleotide, CpG-like motif exists in Lacto- bacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus NIAI B6. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;85(1):11–21. 41. Esfandiary A, Taherian-Esfahani Z, Abedin-Do A, et al. Lactobacilli modulate hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 regulatory pathway in triple negative breast cancer cell line. Cell J. 2016;18(2):237–244. 42. Kovachev S. Defence factors of vaginal lactobacilli. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017;44(1):31–39. 43. Wang KD, Xu DJ, Wang BY, Yan DH, Lv Z, Su JR. Inhibitory effect of vaginal Lactobacillus supernatants on cervical cancer cells. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. Epub 2017 Oct 25;(suppl 1):1–7. 44. Sungur T, Aslim B, Karaaslan C, Aktas B. Impact of exopolysaccharides (EPSs) of Lactobacillus gasseri strains isolated from human vagina on cervical tumor cells (HeLa). Anaerobe. 2017;47:137–144. 45. Piyathilake CJ, Ollberding NJ, Kumar R, Macaluso M, Alvarez RD, Morrow CD. Cervical microbiota associated with higher grade cervi- cal intraepithelial neoplasia in women infected with high-risk human papillomaviruses. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2016;9(5):357–366. 46. Seo SS, Oh HY, Lee JK, Kong JS, Lee DO, Kim MK. Combined effect of diet and cervical microbiome on the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(6):1434–1441. 47. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16865. 48. Oh HY, Kim BS, Seo SS, et al. The association of uterine cervical microbiota with an increased risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Korea. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(7):674.e1–e9. 49. Mitra A, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, et al. The vaginal microbiome of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Microbiome. 2015;9(25):976–977. 50. Wojciech K, Kotarski J, Barczynski B, et al. A meta genomic approach to characterization of the cervix microbiome during HPV dependent carcinogenesis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015;9(25):848. 51. Silva C, Almeida EC, Côbo Ede C, Zeferino VF, Murta EF, Etchebehere RM. A retrospective study on cervical intraepithelial lesions of low- grade and undetermined significance: evolution, associated factors and cytohistological correlation. Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(2):92–96. 52. Kawana K, Adachi K, Kojima S, et al. Oral vaccination against HPV E7 for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) elicits E7-specific mucosal immunity in the cervix of CIN3 patients. Vaccine. 2014;32(47):6233–6239. 53. Rocha VR, Schüffner Rde O, Soares II, et al. Cervical uterine lesions: an epidemiological and molecular investigation in Midwestern Minas Gerais, Brazil. J Med Virol. 2013;85(5):860–865. 54. Dareng EO, Ma B, Famooto AO, et al. Prevalent high-risk HPV infec- tion and vaginal microbiota in Nigerian women. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144(1):123–137. 55. Ou YC, Lin H Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral lactobacilli to facilitate the clearance of genital high risk HPV infection in women. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;141(22):E695. 56. Okawa T, Niibe H, Arai T, et al. Effect of LC9018 combined with radia- tion therapy on carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Cancer. 1993;72(6):1949–1954. 57. Okawa T, Kita M, Arai T, et al. Phase II randomized clinical trial of LC9018 concurrently used with radiation in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Its effect on tumor reduction and histology. Cancer. 1989;64(9):1769–1776. www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com Cancer Management and Research 2018:10 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Dovepress Cancer Management and Research Publish your work in this journal Submit your manuscript here: https://www.dovepress.com/cancer-management-and-research-journal Cancer Management and Research is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on cancer research and the optimal use of preventative and integrated treatment interventions to achieve improved outcomes, enhanced survival and quality of life for the cancer patient. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Dovepress 1229 Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer 58. Li X, Wang H, Du X, et al. Lactobacilli inhibit cervical cancer cell migration in vitro and reduce tumor burden in vivo through upregula- tion of E-cadherin. Oncol Rep. 2017;38(3):1561–1568. 59. Jang SE, Jeong JJ, Choi SY, Kim H, Han MJ, Kim DH. Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14 attenuate Gardnerella vaginalis-infected bacterial vaginosis in mice. Nutrients. 2017;9(6):E531. 60. Nouri Z, Karami F, Neyazi N, et al. Dual anti-metastatic and anti- proliferative activity assessment of two probiotics on HeLa and HT-29 cell lines. Cell J. 2016;18(2):127–134. 61. Motevaseli E, Azam R, Akrami SM, et al. The effect of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus culture supernatants on expres- sion of autophagy genes and HPV E6 and E7oncogenes in the HeLa cell line. Cell J. 2016;17(4):601–607. 62. Kim SN, Lee WM, Park KS, Kim JB, Han DJ, Bae J. The effect of Lactobacillus casei extract on cervical cancer cell lines. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2015;19(4):306–312. 63. Nami Y, Abdullah N, Haghshenas B, Radiah D, Rosli R, Khosroushahi AY. Assessment of probiotic potential and anticancer activity of newly isolated vaginal bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 5BL. Microbiol Immunol. 2014;58(9):492–502. 64. Motevaseli E, Shirzad M, Akrami SM, Mousavi AS, Mirsalehian A, Modarressi MH. Normal and tumour cervical cells respond differently to vaginal lactobacilli, independent of pH and lactate. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(pt 7):1065–1072. 65. Ribelles P, Benbouziane B, Langella P, Suárez JE, Bermúdez-Humarán LG. Protection against human papillomavirus type 16-induced tumors in mice using non-genetically modified lactic acid bacteria displaying E7 antigen at its surface. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(3):1231–1239. 66. Adachi K, Kawana K, Yokoyama T, et al. Oral immunization with a Lac- tobacillus casei vaccine expressing human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 E7 is an effective strategy to induce mucosal cytotoxic lymphocytes against HPV16 E7. Vaccine. 2010;28(16):2810–2817. 67. Poo H, Pyo HM, Lee TY, et al. Oral administration of human papillomavi- rus type 16 E7 displayed on Lactobacillus casei induces E7-specific anti- tumor effects in C57/BL6 mice. Int J Cancer. 2006;119(7):1702–1709. 68. Aires KA, Cianciarullo AM, Carneiro SM, et al. Production of human papillomavirus type 16 L1 virus-like particles by recombinant Lacto- bacillus casei cells. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(1):745–752. 69. McNicol PJ, Paraskevas M, Guijon FB. The effect of vaginal microbes on in vivo and in vitro expression of human papillomavirus 16 E6-E7 genes. Cancer Detect Prev. 1999;23(1):13–21. www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com www.dovepress.com OLE_LINK37 OLE_LINK12 ScreenPosition OLE_LINK265 OLE_LINK43 OLE_LINK42 OLE_LINK88 OLE_LINK87 OLE_LINK25 OLE_LINK171 OLE_LINK7 OLE_LINK35 OLE_LINK36 OLE_LINK27 OLE_LINK3 OLE_LINK161 OLE_LINK163 OLE_LINK8 OLE_LINK16 OLE_LINK49 OLE_LINK52 OLE_LINK164 OLE_LINK263 OLE_LINK48 OLE_LINK23 OLE_LINK165 OLE_LINK166 OLE_LINK51 OLE_LINK68 OLE_LINK29 OLE_LINK28 OLE_LINK32 OLE_LINK30 OLE_LINK6 OLE_LINK5 OLE_LINK162 OLE_LINK197 OLE_LINK198 OLE_LINK24 OLE_LINK128 OLE_LINK244 OLE_LINK10 OLE_LINK11 OLE_LINK15 OLE_LINK199 OLE_LINK200 OLE_LINK21 OLE_LINK22 OLE_LINK1 OLE_LINK201 OLE_LINK202 OLE_LINK203 OLE_LINK204 OLE_LINK206 OLE_LINK39 OLE_LINK40 OLE_LINK46 OLE_LINK41 OLE_LINK205 OLE_LINK47 OLE_LINK53 OLE_LINK79 OLE_LINK78 OLE_LINK54 OLE_LINK56 OLE_LINK73 OLE_LINK58 OLE_LINK57 OLE_LINK270 OLE_LINK96 OLE_LINK91 OLE_LINK66 OLE_LINK65 OLE_LINK72 OLE_LINK70 OLE_LINK71 OLE_LINK207 OLE_LINK208 OLE_LINK63 OLE_LINK82 OLE_LINK89 OLE_LINK90 OLE_LINK98 OLE_LINK77 OLE_LINK103 OLE_LINK95 OLE_LINK97 OLE_LINK102 OLE_LINK75 OLE_LINK76 OLE_LINK83 OLE_LINK84 OLE_LINK81 OLE_LINK210 OLE_LINK108 OLE_LINK38 OLE_LINK211 OLE_LINK213 OLE_LINK109 OLE_LINK212 OLE_LINK214 OLE_LINK110 OLE_LINK59 OLE_LINK274 OLE_LINK62 OLE_LINK216 OLE_LINK64 OLE_LINK74 OLE_LINK105 OLE_LINK106 OLE_LINK218 OLE_LINK4 OLE_LINK26 OLE_LINK9 OLE_LINK118 OLE_LINK145 OLE_LINK229 OLE_LINK222 OLE_LINK153 OLE_LINK175 OLE_LINK179 OLE_LINK183 OLE_LINK196 OLE_LINK209 OLE_LINK215 OLE_LINK217 OLE_LINK219 OLE_LINK33 OLE_LINK241 OLE_LINK271 OLE_LINK272 OLE_LINK55 OLE_LINK31 OLE_LINK44 OLE_LINK34 OLE_LINK45 OLE_LINK273 OLE_LINK120 OLE_LINK50 OLE_LINK14 OLE_LINK99 OLE_LINK94 OLE_LINK249 OLE_LINK246 OLE_LINK251 OLE_LINK195 OLE_LINK247 OLE_LINK252 OLE_LINK250 OLE_LINK259 OLE_LINK258 OLE_LINK245 OLE_LINK257 OLE_LINK266 OLE_LINK256 OLE_LINK262 OLE_LINK253 OLE_LINK255 OLE_LINK248 OLE_LINK260 OLE_LINK261 OLE_LINK86 OLE_LINK85 OLE_LINK268 OLE_LINK275 OLE_LINK277 OLE_LINK276 OLE_LINK254 OLE_LINK269 OLE_LINK114 OLE_LINK176 OLE_LINK168 OLE_LINK170 OLE_LINK173 OLE_LINK221 OLE_LINK223 OLE_LINK174 OLE_LINK278 OLE_LINK220 OLE_LINK177 OLE_LINK111 OLE_LINK284 OLE_LINK178 OLE_LINK180 OLE_LINK279 OLE_LINK281 OLE_LINK285 OLE_LINK283 OLE_LINK286 OLE_LINK280 OLE_LINK282 OLE_LINK181 OLE_LINK182 OLE_LINK169 OLE_LINK126 OLE_LINK127 OLE_LINK113 OLE_LINK112 OLE_LINK225 OLE_LINK123 OLE_LINK224 OLE_LINK132 OLE_LINK226 OLE_LINK131 OLE_LINK184 OLE_LINK186 OLE_LINK227 OLE_LINK228 OLE_LINK185 OLE_LINK190 OLE_LINK191 OLE_LINK230 OLE_LINK187 OLE_LINK189 OLE_LINK231 OLE_LINK233 OLE_LINK232 OLE_LINK188 OLE_LINK193 OLE_LINK236 OLE_LINK237 OLE_LINK235 OLE_LINK192 OLE_LINK234 OLE_LINK194 OLE_LINK167 OLE_LINK133 OLE_LINK130 OLE_LINK129 OLE_LINK159 OLE_LINK100 OLE_LINK116 OLE_LINK61 OLE_LINK101 OLE_LINK238 OLE_LINK104 OLE_LINK239 OLE_LINK136 OLE_LINK135 OLE_LINK134 OLE_LINK107 OLE_LINK117 OLE_LINK115 OLE_LINK93 OLE_LINK148 OLE_LINK140 OLE_LINK92 OLE_LINK242 OLE_LINK137 OLE_LINK240 OLE_LINK138 OLE_LINK124 OLE_LINK139 OLE_LINK125 OLE_LINK150 OLE_LINK142 OLE_LINK141 OLE_LINK151 OLE_LINK143 OLE_LINK144 OLE_LINK243 OLE_LINK146 OLE_LINK152 OLE_LINK147 OLE_LINK149 OLE_LINK69 OLE_LINK67 OLE_LINK60 OLE_LINK80 OLE_LINK154 OLE_LINK157 OLE_LINK156 OLE_LINK155 OLE_LINK160 OLE_LINK158 OLE_LINK13 NumRef_1 Ref_Start REF_1 newREF_1 NumRef_2 REF_2 newREF_2 NumRef_3 REF_3 newREF_3 NumRef_4 REF_4 newREF_4 NumRef_5 REF_5 newREF_5 NumRef_6 REF_6 newREF_6 NumRef_7 REF_7 newREF_7 NumRef_8 REF_8 newREF_8 NumRef_9 REF_9 newREF_9 NumRef_35 REF_35 newREF_35 NumRef_36 REF_36 newREF_36 NumRef_37 REF_37 newREF_37 NumRef_38 REF_38 newREF_38 NumRef_39 REF_39 newREF_39 NumRef_40 REF_40 newREF_40 NumRef_41 REF_41 newREF_41 NumRef_42 REF_42 newREF_42 NumRef_43 REF_43 newREF_43 NumRef_44 REF_44 newREF_44 NumRef_45 REF_45 newREF_45 NumRef_46 REF_46 newREF_46 NumRef_47 REF_47 newREF_47 NumRef_48 REF_48 newREF_48 NumRef_49 REF_49 newREF_49 NumRef_51 REF_51 newREF_51 NumRef_52 REF_52 newREF_52 NumRef_53 REF_53 newREF_53 NumRef_54 REF_54 newREF_54 NumRef_55 REF_55 newREF_55 NumRef_56 REF_56 newREF_56 NumRef_57 REF_57 newREF_57 NumRef_58 REF_58 newREF_58 NumRef_60 REF_60 newREF_60 NumRef_61 REF_61 newREF_61 NumRef_62 REF_62 newREF_62 NumRef_63 REF_63 newREF_63 NumRef_64 REF_64 newREF_64 NumRef_65 REF_65 newREF_65 NumRef_66 REF_66 newREF_66 NumRef_67 REF_67 newREF_67 NumRef_68 REF_68 newREF_68 NumRef_69 REF_69 newREF_69 NumRef_70 REF_70 newREF_70 NumRef_71 Ref_End REF_71 newREF_71 Publication Info 4:
Compartilhar