In relation to the theory of deliberate ignorance in cases of administrative impropriety, analyze the following statements: I - There is no legal, ...

In relation to the theory of deliberate ignorance in cases of administrative impropriety, analyze the following statements:
I - There is no legal, doctrinal or jurisprudential basis in our higher courts that authorizes the application of the theory of deliberate ignorance in matters of administrative impropriety.
II - The Superior Court of Justice has admitted, in exceptional cases, the filing of an Action for Administrative Impropriety against legal consultants or opinion makers if there is intent.
III - With the advent of Law No. 14.230/2021, the legal advisory that issues an opinion stating the prior legality of administrative acts practiced by the public manager is obliged to defend the manager judicially, if he or she comes to respond to an action for administrative impropriety.
IV - The Law No. 8.429/92, in its articles 9 to 11, describes the behaviors that characterize administrative impropriety, dividing them into three distinct groups.

a) Only statements I and II are correct.
b) Only statements II and III are correct.
c) Only statements III and IV are correct.
d) All statements are correct.