From what perspective does it make sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym? And from what perspective does it make sense to say that a hy...

From what perspective does it make sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym? And from what perspective does it make sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym? a. It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of sense, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of extension. b. It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of semantics, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of pragmatics. c. It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of implicatures, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of propositional content. d. It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of presupposition, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of logic. e. It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of necessary and sufficient conditions, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of entailment.