From what perspective does it make sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym? And from what perspective does it make sense to say that a hy...

From what perspective does it make sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym? And from what perspective does it make sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym? 

a.

It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of semantics, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of pragmatics. 

b.

It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of presupposition, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of logic. 

c.

It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of necessary and sufficient conditions, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of entailment. 

d.

It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of implicatures, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of propositional content. 

e.

It makes sense to say that a hyponym includes its hypernym from the perspective of sense, and it makes sense to say that a hypernym includes its hyponym from the perspective of extension.