Assuming that the following legal actions are available to a Promotor de Tutela Coletiva, which one should be taken in the given scenario? SOURCE: ...

Assuming that the following legal actions are available to a Promotor de Tutela Coletiva, which one should be taken in the given scenario? SOURCE: FGV - Tec (MPE RJ)/MPE RJ/Administrativa/2016 Legislação Civil e Processual Civil Especial - Da Ação Civil Pública (Lei nº 7.347/1985 e CF/1988) Promotor de Tutela Coletiva instaurou inquérito civil público for investigating the legality of the delegation of the municipal public transportation service to a certain business society by the Municipality. During the investigations, it was proven that the administrative contract signed for this purpose was not preceded by a bidding process, but the fare charged to users has a moderate price. Therefore, the Prosecutor should:


a) archive the civil inquiry, due to the autonomy of the contracting parties and the moderate fare, which demonstrate that there is no harm to the public interest;
b) archive the civil inquiry in relation to the business society, due to the moderate fare, and file a public civil action to compel the Municipality to carry out a bidding process for the delegation of the public service;
c) file a public civil action to compel the Municipality to carry out a bidding process, in the concurrence modality, for the concession of the municipal public transportation service;
d) file a public civil action to compel the Municipality to carry out a bidding process, in the taking of prices modality, for the permission of the municipal public transportation service;
e) file a public civil action to compel the Municipality to carry out a bidding process, for delegation in the authorization modality of the municipal public transportation service.