In the Courts of Law of the capital of State X, hundreds of similar demands were being processed, filed by public servants linked to Municipality Y...

In the Courts of Law of the capital of State X, hundreds of similar demands were being processed, filed by public servants linked to Municipality Y discussing the constitutionality of a municipal ordinary law dealing with the salary and wage plan of the category. Anticipating the risk of a violation of equality, with the possibility of contradictory decisions, the lawyer of one of the parties decides to take a judicial measure to standardize the understanding of the legal issue. In this case, the lawyer must petition
A) to the Court of Law in which the lawsuit filed by him is pending, requesting the initiation of a competence assumption incident.
B) to the President of the Court to which the Court of Law is linked, requesting the initiation of a repetitive demands resolution incident.
C) to the President of the Court to which the Court of Law is linked, requesting the initiation of an unconstitutionality challenge incident.
D) to the Court of Law in which the lawsuit filed by him is pending, requesting the notification of the Public Prosecutor's Office for the conversion of the individual lawsuit into a collective one.