CLI sufixos e prefixos CLI

Prévia do material em texto

C) Accomplices must have a formal agreement with the principal offender to be held 
liable. 
D) Accomplices are not liable if they withdraw from the crime before it is committed. 
E) Accomplices can only be prosecuted if the principal offender is convicted. 
Correct option: B) 
Explanation: Accomplices can be held liable for the same crimes as the principal offender, 
even if they did not directly commit the act, as long as they assisted or encouraged the 
commission of the crime. 
 
58) In the context of property law, particularly regarding the concept of a lease, which of 
the following statements accurately reflects the rights and obligations of landlords and 
tenants, especially concerning the terms of the lease agreement? 
A) Tenants have the right to make significant alterations to the property without the 
landlord's consent. 
B) Landlords are responsible for maintaining the property in a habitable condition 
throughout the lease term. 
C) Tenants can terminate the lease at any time without notice. 
D) Landlords can evict tenants without following legal procedures if they fail to pay rent. 
E) Tenants have no rights to privacy in the leased property. 
Correct option: B) 
Explanation: Landlords are obligated to maintain the property in a habitable condition 
throughout the lease term, ensuring that it meets basic living standards for tenants. 
 
59) In the context of constitutional law, particularly regarding the Due Process Clause, 
which of the following scenarios would most likely be evaluated under the substantive due 
process standard, especially when assessing the government's interference with 
fundamental rights? 
A) A law that imposes a waiting period for obtaining a marriage license. 
B) A law that restricts access to public parks based on residency. 
C) A law that criminalizes certain forms of speech. 
D) A law that regulates the sale of firearms. 
E) A law that limits the right to vote based on age. 
Correct option: A) 
Explanation: Laws that impose restrictions on fundamental rights, such as the right to 
marry, are evaluated under the substantive due process standard, requiring the 
government to demonstrate a compelling interest for the restriction. 
 
60) In the context of tort law, particularly regarding the concept of intentional infliction of 
emotional distress, which of the following elements must a plaintiff establish to 
successfully prove their claim, especially when evaluating the defendant's conduct? 
A) The defendant's conduct was extreme and outrageous. 
B) The defendant intended to cause emotional distress or acted with reckless disregard for 
the likelihood of causing distress. 
C) The plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress as a result of the defendant's conduct. 
D) The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's conduct was directed specifically 
at them. 
E) All of the above elements must be established to prove intentional infliction of 
emotional distress. 
Correct option: E) 
Explanation: To establish a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the 
plaintiff must prove that the defendant's conduct was extreme and outrageous, intended 
to cause distress, and resulted in severe emotional harm. 
 
61) In the context of family law, particularly regarding divorce proceedings, which of the 
following factors is most commonly considered by courts when determining the division of 
marital property, especially in cases where the couple has accumulated significant 
assets? 
A) The length of the marriage and the contributions of each spouse to the marriage. 
B) The financial needs of each spouse following the divorce. 
C) The conduct of each spouse during the marriage, including any instances of marital 
misconduct. 
D) The tax implications of the property division for both spouses. 
E) All of the above factors may be relevant in determining the division of marital property. 
Correct option: E) 
Explanation: Courts consider multiple factors, including the length of the marriage, 
contributions, financial needs, and conduct, to determine a fair division of marital 
property. 
 
62) In the context of criminal law, particularly regarding the concept of plea agreements, 
which of the following statements accurately reflects the legal implications of a plea 
bargain, especially concerning the rights of the defendant and the prosecution's 
obligations? 
A) A plea agreement must be approved by a judge to be valid and enforceable. 
B) A defendant waives their right to appeal any conviction resulting from a plea agreement. 
C) The prosecution is required to disclose all evidence against the defendant before a plea 
agreement is reached. 
D) A plea agreement can only be offered in felony cases, not misdemeanors. 
E) A defendant cannot be compelled to accept a plea agreement and has the right to go to 
trial. 
Correct option: E) 
Explanation: A defendant cannot be compelled to accept a plea agreement and retains 
the right to go to trial, even if a plea deal is offered by the prosecution. 
 
63) In the context of corporate law, particularly regarding fiduciary duties, which of the 
following statements best describes the obligations of corporate directors to act in the 
best interests of the corporation and its shareholders, especially when faced with 
potential conflicts of interest? 
A) Directors are required to prioritize their personal interests over those of the corporation 
when making decisions. 
B) Directors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from 
decisions where their interests may conflict. 
C) Directors are allowed to engage in self-dealing as long as it is disclosed to 
shareholders. 
D) Directors have no obligation to consider the long-term effects of their decisions on the 
corporation's sustainability. 
E) Directors can act in their own interests as long as they believe it will ultimately benefit 
the corporation. 
Correct option: B) 
Explanation: Corporate directors have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the 
corporation and its shareholders, which includes disclosing conflicts of interest and 
recusing themselves from related decisions. 
 
64) In the context of tort law, particularly regarding the concept of negligence, which of the 
following elements must a plaintiff establish to successfully prove a negligence claim, 
especially when considering the standard of care owed by the defendant? 
A) The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. 
B) The defendant breached that duty of care. 
C) The breach of duty caused the plaintiff's injuries. 
D) The plaintiff suffered actual damages as a result of the defendant's actions.