Prévia do material em texto
03/11/2020 Experimental - Determining Catalytic Activity - ORR Catalysis with Pt-based CSNPs https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-activity 1/3 ORR Catalysis with Pt-based CSNPs Home Background Oxygen Reduction Reaction d-Band Theory Experimental - Determining the Location of the d- Band Center Results - Location of d-Band Center for Various Bulk Alloys Transition to the Nanoscale Experimental - Determining Catalytic Activity Experimental - Determining Catalytic Stability Results - The Particle Size Effect Core/Shell Nanoparticles Experimental - Preparation of CSNPs Looking Forward - CSNPs for Catalysis of the ORR Quiz References Sitemap Home > Transition to the Nanoscale > Experimental - Determining Catalytic Activity Catalytic activity has been mentioned a few times before, but it has yet to be discussed in any significant level of detail. The activity of a catalyst is effectively just the rate of a specific reaction on that catalyst. Catalytic activity is reported in two distinct ways in the literature: specific activity (SA), which is just the rate normalized to the real surface area of the catalyst, and mass activity (MA), which is just the rate normalized to the mass of catalyst employed.3 The methods for determining both types of activity are incredibly similar, and rely on the use of a rotating disk electrode (RDE) to generate cyclic voltammograms. The general setup for an activity measurement is a three-electrode cell (typically glass or Teflon), as illustrated below. The working electrode is an RDE with the catalyst of interest attached, the counter electrode is typically just a graphite rod, and the reference electrode is quite frequently a standard Ag/AgCl electrode. The reference electrode is isolated from the rest of the cell by a Nafion membrane in order to prevent the diffusion of chloride ions into the electrolyte. Since actual fuel cell stacks tend to employ acidic electrolytes, the electrolyte of choice is usually 0.1 M HClO4, and these measurements are normally conducted at room temperature. For the sake of brevity, we will not discuss in detail cyclic voltammetry or the complicated fluid dynamics governing an RDE. Cyclic voltammetry just involves applying a sawtooth potential waveform and measuring the resulting current as a function of potential. For reference, a typical window is 0.05 VRHE to 1.2 VRHE at 50 mV/s.4 An RDE is just like any normal electrode, except it can be programmed to rotate at any particular frequency (1600 rpm is pretty standard). This rotation generates a fluid current that increases the flux on the working electrode. Search this site Traduzir https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/ https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/overview https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/oxygen-reduction-reaction-orr https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/d-band-theory https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/d-band-theory/experimental---determining-the-location-of-the-d-band-center https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/d-band-theory/results---location-of-d-band-center-for-various-bulk-alloys https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-stability https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/results---the-particle-size-effect https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/core-shell-nanoparticles https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/core-shell-nanoparticles/experimental---preparation-of-csnps https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/core-shell-nanoparticles/looking-forward---csnps-for-catalysis-of-the-orr https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/quiz https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/references https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/system/app/pages/sitemap/hierarchy https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-activity/three%20electrode%20cell.jpg?attredirects=0 javascript:void(0) 03/11/2020 Experimental - Determining Catalytic Activity - ORR Catalysis with Pt-based CSNPs https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-activity 2/3 The first step of determining activity involves determining the potential of the reference electrode with respect to a universal standard, like the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). The potential of a particular reference electrode can vary by a couple millivolts between days, which can drastically impact the reported activity -- hence, it is important to standardize the measurements. This is accomplished by saturating the electrolyte with hydrogen gas (~15 minutes for a 150 mL cell), rotating the RDE such that the oxidation of hydrogen is not limited by diffusion, and determining the potential at which no current flows. This is the potential of the reference electrode with respect to RHE. The second step involves purging the system with oxygen (again ~15 minutes for a 150 mL cell), rotating the RDE at various prescribed speeds (commonly 400 rpm, 900 rpm, 1600 rpm, and 2500 rpm), and recording a CV in the potential window described above. A background curve is generated by recording a CV in the same potential window, but in an environment saturated with argon. Subtracting the background curve from each of the oxygen curves is equivalent to correcting for non-Faradaic currents (such as those due to charging/discharging of the electrical double layer capacitance). The result is a set of ORR polarization curves, such as those shown below. There are a few interesting concepts these curves illustrate nicely. Lower potentials (~0.05 V to 0.6 V) correspond to higher overpotentials (since the ORR is a reduction reaction), and hence in the range of lower potentials, pretty much every oxygen molecule that comes in contact with the working electrode is reduced immediately. Since the fluid flux (and hence the oxygen flux) on the working electrode increases with increasing rotation rate, it makes sense that higher (in magnitude) currents are observed in this region at higher angular frequencies. The second limiting case, at higher potentials, is significantly less interesting -- all of the polarization curves converge https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-activity/orr%20polarization%20curves.jpg?attredirects=0 03/11/2020 Experimental - Determining Catalytic Activity - ORR Catalysis with Pt-based CSNPs https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-activity 3/3 to zero current when the potential is not sufficient to drive the reaction. In-between these two limiting regions is where all the magic happens: in this region, the measured current has two contributing components, the so-called diffusion and kinetic currents. The latter of these is what we care about: it's the additional current generated due to catalysis of the reaction. This is the current that defines the activity of a catalyst. Catalytic activity, however, is typically not reported as a current, but rather a current density.In the case of MA, the kinetic current at a particular potential (standard is 0.9 VRHE) is simply divided by the mass of catalyst used. In the case of SA, the kinetic current is divided by the real surface area of the catalyst. This, however, is not just the area of the disk to which the catalyst is attached -- nanoparticulate catalysts are rough, and hence their real surface areas are significantly higher than their geomoetric surface areas. A rough estimate of real surface area can be obtained by performing a CO-stripping experiment, in which carbon monoxide is allowed to adsorb to the surface to form a monolayer (~7 minutes), the system is purged with argon to remove all of the carbon monoxide except what is adsorbed to the catalyst (~25 minutes), and then a series of at least two CVs is run. A sample CO-stripping curve is provided below -- the red line corresponds to the first run (the huge peak is caused by the oxidation of CO to CO2, which promptly diffuses away from the electrode), and the blue line corresponds to the second run (equivalent to the argon background from before). The area of the CO-stripping peak is essentially just the charge transfer due to the oxidation events, and this charge can be related to the real surface area of the catalyst.4 Fazer login | Atividade recente no site | Denunciar abuso | Imprimir página | Tecnologia Google Sites Comentários Você não tem permissão para adicionar comentários. https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-activity/CO%20stripping.jpg?attredirects=0 https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?continue=https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/home/transition-to-the-nanoscale/experimental---determining-catalytic-activity&service=jotspot https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/system/app/pages/recentChanges https://sites.google.com/site/orrcatalysiswithptbasedcsnps/system/app/pages/reportAbuse javascript:; http://sites.google.com/site