Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
203 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces TYLER T. BOYNTON, ELIE M. FERNEINI, AND MORTON H. GOLDBERG Dental care largely consists of the treatment of dental infection or the restoration and replacement of dentition lost to bacterial infection. The prevention and treatment of orofacial infection involves every aspect of dental care: caries, pulpal disease, gingivoperiodontal pathological con- ditions, trauma, and reconstructive and implant surgery. The surgeon routinely faces the realities of the potentially pathogenic flora of an odontogenic infection when surgi- cal procedures are performed in or around the oral cavity. This chapter focuses on the etiology, clinical manifestations, anatomic considerations, and treatment of odontogenic infections. Dental infection has plagued humankind for as long as the species has existed. Little imagination is required to picture a primitive man suffering pain and swelling of the face because of fractured teeth, dental caries, or periodon- tal disease. Indeed, infection of dental origin is one of the most common diseases of humans and in underdeveloped countries is a frequent cause of death. The remains of Native Americans, unearthed in the American Midwest, and the remains of people who lived in early Egypt have revealed the bony crypts of dental abscesses and sinus tracts and the ravages of osteomyelitis of the jaws. Treatment of localized infection was probably the first primitive surgical procedure performed, and it most likely involved the opening of bulging abscesses with sharp stones or pointed sticks. Today, the principle remains the same; for- tunately, the techniques have improved. Not until the early twentieth century, however, was a causal relationship defi- nitely established between dental infection and the severe life-threatening neck swelling that Ludwig described nearly 70 years earlier.1 Although therapy has progressed, the scal- pel, extraction forceps, and the endodontic reamer remain the keystones of therapy for odontogenic infections, along with the judicious use of antibiotics. Despite great advances in dental care in Western society, including fluoridation of water, early interception of car- ies, and periodontal prophylaxis, infection remains a major problem in dental practice. Although penicillin was con- sidered the long-awaited panacea for dental infection, the bacteriologic spectrum of the oral flora and the understand- ing of its complexities have undergone rapid evolution since penicillin was introduced. Before the antibiotic era, most serious odontogenic infections were known to be streptococcal, but the prob- lem of bacterial resistance to antibiotics soon became obvi- ous in the oral cavity, as elsewhere. The serious epidemic of penicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections of the 1950s and 1960s was finally resolved by the development of the semisynthetic antibiotics, which are not metabolized by the penicillinase enzyme of the staphylococci. The widespread use of these drugs has resulted in the current plague of human infection from enteric (gram-negative) and oppor- tunistic organisms, including vancomycin-resistant entero- cocci and methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Mutation and selective genetic pressure have resulted in bacterial species that exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics, a situation complicated by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) exchange between species. Nature abhors a vacuum, even a biological one. The empty ecological niche created by the decline of certain pathogenic bacterial species is soon filled by other organ- isms. The human oral cavity is a biological system that sup- ports life for as many as 400 species of microorganisms. Bacterial infection of dental origin is a constantly changing but measurable reflection of the modern evolution of the oral flora.2-4 During the past five decades, dangerous and life-threat- ening dental infections have been reported and are related to a variety of bacterial species, some opportunistic, oth- ers nosocomial, and a few anaerobic. These include Esch- erichia coli and Pseudomonas, Proteus, Serratia, Acinetobacter (Mima), Klebsiella, Eikenella, Bacteroides (Prevotella), and Corynebacterium and other less common organisms. For example, Pseudomonas, once thought to be a rare tran- sient in the oral cavity, currently is found in the saliva of 204 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region 5 to 10% of healthy subjects. Similar changes have been observed in the pharyngeal flora that are probably related to antibiotically induced reduction of normal flora, acquiring of new flora during hospitalization, and use of immuno- suppressive drugs. Aerobic gram-negative rods inhabit the pharynges of 5% of normal nonhospitalized persons, but col- onize the pharynges of more than 60% of institutionalized older and hospitalized patients with serious illnesses, those who have undergone surgical procedures, and critical care health workers. Nevertheless, aerobic and anaerobic strepto- cocci, Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, and Eikenella, and mixed aerobic-anaerobic flora are the organisms most commonly identified in odontogenic infections in otherwise healthy patients.5 Quantitative estimations of the number of micro- organisms in saliva and plaque range as high as 1011/mL. In the depths of a periodontal pocket, the number of anaer- obes per gram of curetted material may reach 1.8 times 1011/mL, approximately the same concentration of anaer- obes in human feces. Considering this plethora of microor- ganisms that grow luxuriantly in this wet, warm, dark, and debris-strewn cavity, the effectiveness of the systemic and oral host defense mechanisms in preventing serious infec- tion from commonplace minor trauma, such as cheek bit- ing or the shedding of deciduous teeth, is remarkable. Recent investigational data gathered from molecular genetic methods, including gene sequencing from bacte- rial identification, suggests that there may be as many as 400 species of bacteria in the microflora of the human oropharynx. Pathways of Dental Infection The cause of, diagnosis of, and therapy for bacterial infec- tion limited to the dental pulp or periodontal tissue are not described at length here (see Chapters 10 and 11). The narrow pulpal foramen at the root apex, although of insufficient diameter to permit adequate drainage of infected pulp, does serve as a reservoir of bacteria and per- mits egress of bacteria into periodontal tissue and bone. This access explains the occasional problem when antibiotics alone are used to treat draining fistulas from abscessed teeth. Once the drainage ceases, the bacteria harbored in the pulp chamber subsequently repopulate the periapical tissues from the untreated pulp, thus reinitiating the infection. Serious dental infection spreading beyond the socket is more com- monly the result of pulpal infection than of periodontal infection. Once infection extends past the apex of the tooth, the pathophysiological course of a given infectious process can vary, depending on the number and virulence of the organism, host resistance, and anatomy of the involved area (Figure 12-1). If the infection remains localized at the root apex, a chronic periapical infection may develop. Frequently, suffi- cient destruction of bone develops to create a well-corticated radiolucency observable on dental radiographs. This pro- cess represents a focal bone infection, but “garden variety” radiolucencies associated with carious teeth should not be confused with true osteomyelitis. Once infection extends beyond the root apex, it can proceed into deeper medullary spaces and evolve into wide- spread osteomyelitis. More commonly, this process forms fistulous tracts through alveolar bone and enters into the surrounding soft tissue. This phenomenon often is associ- ated with sudden soft tissue swelling and a reduction in intrabony pressure, resulting in a lesseningof pain. The fistula may penetrate the mucosa or skin, and thus serve as a natural drain for the abscess (Figure 12-2). The puck- ered, ulcerated, and chronically indurated appearance of such dentocutaneous fistulae frequently leads the unwary or inexperienced examiner to diagnoses ranging from chancre to cancer. Unnecessary, time-consuming, and costly diag- nostic procedures, including biopsy, can be avoided if dental radiographs and careful examinations are performed. Den- tal infection should lead the list of possible diagnoses when facial swelling or a fistula is the initial sign. Once beyond the confines of the dentoalveolar bone, infection can localize as an abscess or spread through soft tissue as cellulitis, or both. In common clinical usage, these Acute-chronic periapical infection Ascending facial-cerebral infection Intraoral soft tissue abscess Bacteremia- septicemia Deep fascial space infection Fistula Osteomyelitis Cellulitis • Figure 12-1 Pathways of dental infection. • Figure 12-2 Chronic cutaneous submandibular fistula of dental origin. 205CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces terms are often confused or used interchangeably. An abscess is a thick-walled cavity containing pus, whereas cellulitis is a diffuse, erythematous submucosal or subcutaneous infec- tion. Staphylococci are frequently associated with abscess formation. These microorganisms produce coagulase, an enzyme that can cause fibrin deposition in citrated or oxa- lated blood. Streptococci are associated more often with cellulitis because they produce enzymes such as strepto- kinase (fibrinolysin), hyaluronidase, and streptodornase. These enzymes break down fibrin and connective tissue ground substance and lyse cellular debris, thus facilitating rapid spread of bacterial invaders. These organisms are not restricted to one type of reaction. Oral infections frequently are composed of a mixed flora, or the bacteria can behave in any untraditional fashion. Thick-walled abscesses, with little or no blood supply to their lumen, respond slowly or poorly to antibiotic therapy, whereas cellulitis usually responds well without surgical drainage. Erysipelas is a specific form of cellulitis (lymphangitis) caused by β-hemolytic streptococci. A discrete entry injury usually occurs on the face, violating this barrier to bacte- ria. Marked interstitial edema of the subcutaneous tissues occurs, but relatively little evidence of necrosis is present. Characteristically, the tissues have a sharply demarcated, brawny, edematous swelling that is intensely red because of vasodilation. The lesion often is associated with a profound toxemia. Treatment of Odontogenic Infections Treatment of odontogenic infections can involve medi- cal, surgical, or dental therapy, or combinations thereof. Any infection of dental origin requires definitive treatment of the affected tooth if the source of the infection is to be eliminated. Once the tooth has been identified, endodon- tic elimination of the infected pulp, deep periodontal scal- ing, or extraction must be performed. The method of tooth treatment is a question of judgment, determined by factors such as the extent of the infection, patient’s general health status, degree of trismus present, and biomechanical neces- sity of retaining the tooth. However, the last factor must not sway the surgeon’s judgment to the detriment of the patient’s well-being. The clinician must avoid “tunnel vision” when diagnosing dental disease, because it can have serious consequences if a major infection is present. Extraction of the involved tooth is the most rapid method of establish- ing drainage, while simultaneously removing the nidus of microorganisms within the pulp chamber and canals. Alter- natively, endodontic therapy can be used to eliminate the source of infection. Reliable evidence indicates that extractions of lower molar teeth in the presence of infection increase the inci- dence of alveolar osteitis. Therefore, antibiotic therapy should be used when a tooth is to be extracted during the acute stage of diffuse or deep infections, especially those involving the mandibular third molars. Incision and Drainage Incision and drainage rid the body of toxic purulent mate- rial and decompress the tissues, allowing better perfusion of blood containing antibiotics and defensive elements and increased oxygenation of the infected area. The abscess should be drained surgically at the same time that dental therapy is performed. Incision and drainage are the oldest and usually the simplest surgical procedures. Rapid, sharp incision through the oral mucosa adjacent to the alveolar bone usually is sufficient to produce “laudable pus”—an eighteenth-century phrase that is both descriptive and exclamatory. The surgeon who could produce instant relief and probably cure by the evacuation of pus from an abscess was also praiseworthy and, therefore, was more renowned than less skillful colleagues who incised prema- turely or in the wrong place. A thorough knowledge of facial and neck anatomy is necessary to properly drain a deep abscess, but an abscess confined to the dentoalveolar region presents no anatomic mysteries to the surgeon. Only the thin, bulging mucosa separates the scalpel from the infection. Ideally, abscesses should be drained when fluctuant before spontaneous rup- ture and drainage. Incision and drainage are best performed at the earliest sign of this ripening of the abscess, although surgical drainage also can be effective early, before the devel- opment of classic fluctuance. The following principles should be used when possible with incision and drainage: 1. Incise in healthy skin and mucosa when possible. An incision placed at the site of maximum fluctuance where the tissues are necrotic or beginning to perforate can result in a puckered, unesthetic scar. 2. Place the incision in an esthetically acceptable area, such as under the shadow of the jaw or in a natural skin fold or crease. 3. When possible, place the incision in a dependent posi- tion to encourage drainage by gravity. 4. Dissect bluntly, with a closed surgical clamp or finger, through deeper tissues and explore all portions of the abscess cavity thoroughly so that compartmentalized areas of pus are disrupted and excavated. Extend the dis- section to the roots of teeth responsible for the infection. 5. Place a drain and stabilize it with sutures. 6. Consider the use of through-and-through drains in bilat- eral, submandibular space infections. 7. Do not leave drains in place for an overly extended period; remove them when drainage becomes minimal. The presence of the drain itself can produce some exu- date and can be a portal for secondary bacterial invaders.6 8. Clean wound margins daily under sterile conditions to remove clots and debris. Another approach to drainage of well-localized abscesses is the use of a computed tomographic (CT)-guided catheter. It is introduced percutaneously and guided into deep neck abscesses. CT-guided catheterization allows precise location 206 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region of the lesion without extensive dissection and subsequent scarring. In select patients, it can be performed in a radi- ology suite. Specimens for Gram staining and culture are readily obtained, and the catheter can be left in place to serve as a drain. The use of heat to “draw” an abscess to the surface has been discussed and debated extensively. The physiology of heat application to infection appears rational because the resulting dilation of small vessels intensifies host defenses through increased vascular flow and diffusion. However, the hope of converting an extraoral abscess into an intraoral one by the use of warm mouth rinses is not well based; no scien- tific evidence exists that any application of heat will produce the desired effect. Fenestration of thealveolar bone with a high-speed den- tal drill, although uncommon, occasionally can be used to relieve pain. Fenestration is best accomplished through the soft tissue drainage wound at the level of the tooth root apex. Medical therapy for localized dentoalveolar abscesses consists mainly of supportive care: hydration, soft diet, anal- gesics, and good oral hygiene. Antibiotic Therapy The use of antibiotics in the treatment of a well-localized and easily drained dentoalveolar abscess is probably unnec- essary, because surgical drainage and dental therapy resolve the infection in most patients. Abscesses and cellulitis in patients who are immunocompromised and in those with systemic signs and symptoms, such as trismus or elevated temperature, usually indicate the need for antibiotics. Poorly localized, extensive abscesses and those associated with diffuse cellulitis require antibiotic therapy. In patients with diminished host defenses, such as those with poorly controlled diabetes, patients who are immuno- suppressed or immunoincompetent, those receiving renal dialysis, or the seriously ill or hospitalized patient, supple- mental antibiotics are required for a dentoalveolar infection because of the fear of sudden, overwhelming sepsis spread- ing from even a small focus. Fatal dental infection may be observed in patients who are immunosuppressed.7-11 Ideally the choice of antibiotic for the therapy of odonto- genic infection depends on the definitive laboratory results of culture and sensitivity testing. Inasmuch as most dento- alveolar infections occur in otherwise healthy outpatients seen in offices and clinics, cultures are not routinely per- formed and usually are not needed. A pragmatically ratio- nal approach to empirical antibiotic selection is acceptable, both ethically and legally, if the choice is based on scientific data and on contemporary experience with the microbiol- ogy of the flora of oral infection. The constantly evolving flora of oral infection has been well documented. Numerous studies have revealed that the majority of infections in the immunocompetent patient consist of mixed aerobic and anaerobic flora. Most contain some anaerobes. The most frequently and consistently iso- lated organisms are aerobic streptococci (α-, β-, and γ-), anaerobic streptococci (Peptostreptococcus), Bacteroides (Por- phyromonas, Prevotella), Fusobacterium, and Eikenella. Less frequently, Bacteroides fragilis, the gram-negative anaer- obic rod that normally inhabits the bowel and pelvis, is found. Skin organisms, such as Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis, currently are reported less frequently than in previous decades of the antibiotic era, but have a high incidence in nonodontogenic facial infections in children. Aerobic Corynebacterium and anaerobic Propionibacterium, both gram-positive rods, are encountered occasionally. Penicillin has been the antibiotic of empirical choice for dental infections for nearly five decades, with a proven record of efficacy. However, the microorganism population of any ecosystem can and does evolve in response to environmental selection or through mutatory influences, whether on the floor of a tropical rain forest or in the gingival sulcus of Homo sapiens. The population of some oral microspecies has demonstrated a profound and measurable change in suscep- tibility to penicillin, and β-lactamase-producing organisms such as Bacteroides now are frequently noted to be insensi- tive to penicillin, with some published series reporting 40% resistance. Even streptococci, which historically have been exquisitely sensitive to penicillin, are occasionally reported as penicillin resistant. Several strains of clindamycin-resistant Bacteroides also have been observed.12-14 Facial surgeons should read and interpret these data with a critical eye. If some 40% of Bacteroides are reported to be resistant, 60% must be sensitive—a ratio that still has therapeutic validity in a mixed aerobic-anaerobic infection treated with penicillin or amoxicillin. The humoral and cellular host defense mechanisms, if normal, are far more essential to the demise of invading organisms than is the antibiotic disk applied in the labora- tory. In addition, obtaining material (pus) for culture usu- ally implies that surgical drainage (or aspiration) has been performed, a procedure that ranks equal in importance to the presence of normal defenses in the successful therapeutic outcome of dentoalveolar infection. Inasmuch as most of these infections are a mixed flora of aerobes and anaerobes, the bacterial synergism that enhances growth of these different types of organisms can be disrupted with penicillin. Whether the aerobic strepto- cocci produce essential nutrients for the anaerobes, provide enzymes, clear metabolites, or reduce the oxygen tension in the tissue, their destruction by penicillin secondarily dimin- ishes the growth and reproduction of the anaerobes. Therefore, penicillin or amoxicillin remain the empirical antibiotics of choice in the treatment of most dentoalveolar infections in the noncompromised host. Stated succinctly and scientifically by Moenning, “It would seem presumptu- ous to state that penicillin is currently not effective against most odontogenic infections and premature to consider substituting another antibiotic as the drug of first choice for mild to moderate odontogenic infections (in non-com- promised hosts), especially when cost and lack of toxicity are also considered.”15 That statement remains as valid in 2015 as it was in 1989. For more severe or recalcitrant infections 207CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces seen in an outpatient environment, culture and antibi- otic sensitivity studies may be necessary. Metronidazole is an effective supplement to penicillin and enhances killing of anaerobes. Oral clindamycin is an excellent choice for both aerobic and anaerobic killing, but its cost and poten- tial side effects must be considered. If a β-lactam antibiotic (i.e., penicillin) has been used for 2 to 3 days without any resolution of an odontogenic infection, the use of another β-lactam or β-lactamase-stable antibiotic (i.e., clindamycin) should be considered.16 The paradox of antibiotic therapy often leads to clini- cal situations in which the solution to problem A creates problem B. Recent observations show that the use of anti- anaerobic antibiotics (clindamycin, metronidazole, amoxi- cillin clavulanate) can create high-density colonization of the stools by vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients who are already colonized by these organisms (i.e., patients in intensive care units), thus enhancing the infection’s mor- bidity and mortality and placing other patients and inten- sive care unit personnel at greater risk of colonization.17 Erythromycin is poorly absorbed and less effective in odontogenic infection than penicillin or clindamycin are, but other macrolides (azithromycin) are tolerated better than erythromycin, resulting in higher compliance rates.18 Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (Augmentin), a potent inhibitor of β-lactamases, is efficacious, but its cost and usefulness in severe infections should inhibit its use in routine odonto- genic infections. First- and second-generation cephalospo- rins are also useful in odontogenic infections. Tetracycline is not recommended for severe anaerobic infection therapy, but its analogues, minocycline and doxycycline, can be use- ful in low-grade dentoalveolar infections. For patients who are sufficiently ill to require hospital- ization for an odontogenic infection and for compromised hosts (including patients with insulin-dependent diabetes, those with chronic alcoholism, intravenous drug abusers, recently hospitalized patients, and those receiving prophy- lactic antibiotics in the previous 4 weeks), clindamycin alone or in combination with metronidazole or gentamicin, or a first- or second-generationcephalosporin can be used, as can parenteral ampicillin-sulbactam (Unasyn). Quinolones have limited activity against anaerobes, and it is difficult to justify their use for odontogenic infections. Fourth-generation quinolones, although useful against anaerobes, have created serious hepatic toxicity in some patients. For the recalcitrant infection that does not respond rapidly to penicillin therapy and in the compromised host, aerobic and anaerobic culture and sensitivity studies are nec- essary to determine whether antibiotics other than penicil- lin are indicated. The use and abuse of antibiotic therapy and the indi- cations for therapy are discussed at length in Chapter 8. Antibiotics are indicated in combination with surgery both therapeutically and prophylactically in the following situations: 1. Acute cellulitis of dental origin 2. Acute pericoronitis with elevated temperature and trismus 3. Deep fascial space infections 4. Open (compound) fractures of the mandible and max- illa, or other facial bones 5. Extensive, deep, or old (>6 hours) orofacial lacerations 6. Dental infection or oral-maxillofacial surgery in the compromised host 7. Prophylaxis for dental surgery for some patients with valvular cardiac disease or a prosthetic valve—also for some class II and all class III and IV operative wounds Whether treatment is medical (antibiotics), surgical (incision and drainage, extraction or endodontics), or both, another important decision is whether hospitalization for the therapy is warranted or ambulatory (office) care is suf- ficient. Recent studies have revealed that odontogenic pain or infection may account for as much as 2% of adult and pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. Extrapolat- ing, this may represent hundreds of thousands of ED visits annually, at the cost of considerable time and money for overburdened health care facilities. One university hospital has reported averaging 40 hos- pital admissions annually for severe odontogenic infections. Other studies reveal that, when admitted, 14% of patients remain intubated for an average of 2.3 days with an aver- age stay in the intensive care unit lasting 3 days. Length of stay correlates with an increased number of involved fascial spaces. In patients with a length of stay greater than 5 days, 55% were related to preoperative or postoperative extrac- tion infections of third molars. More than 70% of patients hospitalized for odontogenic deep space infections are unin- sured, whereas 22% are covered by Medicare. Reported hos- pital billings ranged from $18,000 to $28,000, with one case as high as $611,000.19 The decision regarding whether to treat odontogenic infec- tions in an ambulatory (office, clinic, ED) or inpatient envi- ronment is multifactorial and depends on well-recognized criteria, although educated and experienced surgical judgment remains a flexible influence. The criteria for admission with one or more deep space infections include: 1. Airway obstruction or an impending threat to airway patency based on clinical examination, including dys- pnea, dysphagia, tongue displacement, uvular deviation, and severe trismus (CT scan confirmation of a narrowed airway is obligatory for planning therapy, including anes- thesia. Inability to swallow oral antibiotics may tilt the judgmental balance toward admission.) 2. Severe dehydration or electrolyte imbalance 3. Comorbid medical issues (i.e., loss of glycemic control) 4. Core temperature greater than 101° F 5. Elevated white cell count 6. Necrotizing fasciitis 7. Descending mediastinitis or ascending orbital-cerebral infection 8. Altered or obtruded state of consciousness 9. Social or psychiatric issues (e.g., homelessness, psycho- sis) or the potential for noncompliance with outpatient therapy See Appendix I for an illustrative case report. 208 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region Anatomic Considerations in Dentoalveolar Infections Localization of a dentoalveolar abscess is related to the ana- tomic position of the dental root from which it originated, especially in relationship to muscle attachments and par- ticularly the buccinator and mylohyoid muscles (Figure 12-3). Although a diffuse infection can cause some diagnos- tic consternation, the appearance of an acute dental abscess or fistula distant from its site of origin is rare. Familiarity with dental root anatomy is helpful in the occasional case in which an abscess develops in a less common position. Infection usually follows the path of least resistance, and the data presented in Table 12-1 represent clinical experience and anatomical realities. For example, any acute swelling or fistulous formation of the posterior hard palate should prompt an investigation of the palatal roots of the adjacent maxillary molar. Infection of mandibular incisors and canines usually appears as a bulging erythematous mass deep in the labial sulcus. These infections are obvious to the surgeon and are accessible to drainage by a scalpel. Ideally, the incision should be carried down to bone, but deep sharp dissection at the lower canine-premolar region should be avoided because of the presence of the sensory (mental) nerve to the lip. If the infection spreads from bone deep to the origin of the mentalis muscle, the submental space becomes involved. A lingual site for infection of the mandibular anterior teeth is less common and is usually caused by periodontal sepsis rather than periapical sepsis. A routine gingival incision usu- ally is adequate for drainage on the lingual surface, unless the sublingual space is involved. The mandibular premolars generally demonstrate buccal infection. Incision into the buccal vestibule is indicated, but again discretion must be used because of the presence of the mental nerve and its foramen. If the infection extends inferior to the buccinator muscles laterally or inferior to the mylohyoid muscle lingually, deep infections of the buccal space and submandibular space can occur. Infection of mandibular third molars frequently is peri- odontal (pericoronitis), but can be related to the root api- ces if caries has invaded the pulp of an erupted or partially erupted tooth. The pathways of infection from mandibular A rt ic . w ith te mp oral M an di bu la r f or. Fossa for submaxill. gland Fossa sublingual gland M en ta l s pi ne R am us M ylo-hyoid groove Temporalis External pterygoid Medial pterygoid Mylohyoid line Mylohyoid Genioglossus Geniohyoid Digastric Sup. constrictor Pterygomandibular • Figure 12-3 Lingual surface of the mandible showing the relationship of the mylohyoid muscle attach- ment to the apices of the teeth. This is an important factor in determining whether a sublingual or a sub- mandibular abscess will form. Localization of Dental Abscesses Teeth Common Abscess Site Less Common Site Mandibular incisors Labial Lingual Mandibular canines Labial Lingual Mandibular premolars Buccal Lingual Mandibular molars Buccal Lingual Maxillary incisors Labial Palatal Maxillary canines Labial Palatal Maxillary first premolars Labial (buccal roots) Palatal (palatal roots) — — Maxillary second premolars Buccal Palatal Maxillary molars Buccal (buccal roots) Palatal (palatal roots) — — TABLE 12-1 209CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces third molars may involve the buccal vestibule, buccal fascial space, masticator space, and pharyngeal space. The manifestation of infections of the upper teeth also depends on the anatomic location of their root apices (Figures 12-4 and 12-5). Maxillary incisor and canine roots lie closer to the thin labial plate of bone than to the thicker palatal bone, and infections therefore usually are observed as bulging submucosal (vestibular) abscesses or fistulas in the labial sulcus. The muscles of the upper lip, arising from the alveolar bone,are thin and have little influence on the spread of infection. Generalized cellulitis of the upper lip or midface can occur, but penetration of infection into the floor of the nose is rare. Drainage is accomplished eas- ily by sharp incision into the labial sulcus. When palatal migration of infection does occur from an anterior tooth, it may vary in appearance from minimal swelling to mas- sive bulging of the anterior palate (Figure 12-6). Incision of the palatal mucosa provides adequate drainage. The palatal vessels can be avoided by making the incision parallel to the vessels. A maxillary premolar and molar infection may extend buccally or palatally because multiple roots are usually pres- ent. Infection from maxillary premolars usually extends into the connective tissue of the buccal vestibule and can spread superiorly, causing cellulitis to the level of the eyelids. This situation is best resolved by incising high in the buccal vesti- bule, which usually is the area of dependent fluctuance. The attachment of the buccinator muscle usually is well above the root apex of maxillary premolars, but penetration into the buccal space can occur. A maxillary molar infection may exit from the alveolar bone buccally, palatally, or posteriorly. The buccal vestibule is the most common site for appearance of abscesses but invasion of the buccal space occurs commonly. Molar infec- tion of the palatal region is surprisingly uncommon, consid- ering the length of most molar palatal roots. Superior spread of pus into the maxillary sinus also is uncommon. Posterior spread of infection can involve the masticator and pharyn- geal spaces, and superior extension into the infratemporal space also can occur. In all odontogenic infections, examination usually reveals the presence of deep caries, periodontal inflam- mation, or impacted or fractured teeth as the cause. Bone fractures or gingival trauma should not be overlooked in the search for the causative factors of abscesses or cellulitis. Careful examination of the oral cavity, radiographs, and a high index of suspicion for all restored teeth help to local- ize the origin of the infection. An easily overlooked cause of facial infection is the eruption of the maxillary third molar in an extreme buccal or posterior position, thereby causing erosion of the buccal mucosa, cellulitis, deep space infection, and severe trismus. Because of the difficul- ties of performing adequate examination of the posterior oral cavity in such circumstances and the inadequacies of radiographs, frequently only the suspicious, experienced, and persistent examiner is successful in discovering the cause of the infection. • Figure 12-4 Schematic illustration of maxillary incisor periapical infection with palatal surface dentoalveolar abscess formation. (From Hupp JR, Ellis E, Tucker MR: Contemporary oral and maxillofacial sur- gery, ed 6, St Louis, 2014, Mosby.) • Figure 12-5 Schematic illustration of maxillary incisor periapical infection with labial surface dentoalveolar abscess formation. (From Hupp JR, Ellis E, Tucker MR: Contemporary oral and maxillofacial sur- gery, ed 6, St Louis, 2014, Mosby.) • Figure 12-6 Palatal dentoalveolar abscess originating from a pre- molar (root) infection. (From Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infection, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2002, Saunders.) 210 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region Fascial Space Infection When dental infection spreads deeply into soft tissue rather than exiting superficially through oral or cutaneous routes, fascial spaces can be affected (Box 12-1). Following the path of least resistance through connective tissue and along fascial planes, infection can spread distantly from its dental source, causing considerable morbidity and occasionally death. A thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the face and neck is necessary to predict the pathways of spread of these infec- tions accurately and to drain these deep spaces adequately. Spread of infection through deep fascial spaces is deter- mined by the presence and patterns of loose connective tis- sue. Fasciae develop in planes of connective tissue subjected to muscular movement and contraction. Surrounding or separat- ing muscles, the fasciae and fascial planes offer an anatomically defined highway for infection to spread from superficial to deep parts of the face and neck. A description of deep fascial spaces essentially is an anatomic discussion of the various fasciae that surround or separate the anatomic boundaries of a given space. The concept of fascial “spaces” is based on the anatomist’s knowledge that all spaces exist only potentially until fasciae are separated by pus, blood, drains, or a surgeon’s finger. Infections of fascial spaces are discussed here primarily in terms of their odontogenic origins. Teeth are the most common cause of these infections, and therapy is incomplete without definitive dental treatment. However, deep fascial space infections of the neck also can occur as a result of pha- ryngeal and tonsillar infections, trauma, reconstructive sur- gery, cancer surgery, and sialadenitis of major salivary glands. Each fascial space infection described in this chapter is a clinical entity; case reports appearing in Appendix I illustrate the unique characteristic of each situation. In the treatment of infections of fascial spaces, including surgical treatment, the principles discussed earlier should always be considered. The following points also are germane: 1. Diffusion of antibiotics into close fascial spaces is lim- ited because of poor vascularity. Penetration of antibiot- ics through thick-walled abscesses is minimal. “Average” doses may be inadequate. 2. Therapy of fascial space infections depends on adequate, open, and dependent drainage. 3. Large surgical incisions may be necessary to obtain ade- quate exposure of deep compartments. 4. Fascial spaces are contiguous, and infection spreads read- ily from one space to another. Multiple incisions may be necessary because frequently more than one space is involved in the infection. 5. Primary and secondary spaces must be drained. 6. The anatomy of the face or neck may be severely distorted by the swelling of the infectious process. 7. Repeated surgical drainage may be necessary. 8. The fascial spaces most commonly involved in odonto- genic infections are the submandibular, submental, and buccal spaces. Less common are the masticator space compartments, lateral pharyngeal, and temporal spaces. Least common are the retropharyngeal and canine spaces. Although observation and palpation can elicit the pres- ence of superficial dentoalveolar and fascial space infections (i.e., buccal, canine, submental spaces), the presence of deep infections must always be a suspicion. The presence of dysphagia, dyspnea, prolonged white blood cell and tem- perature elevation, and unresolved trismus suggests the need for repeated imaging (CT, magnetic resonance imaging) of deep spaces, inasmuch as the presence of or even surgical drainage of superficial infection may obscure a concomitant or secondary deep space involvement. Canine Space The canine space is infrequently involved in odontogenic infections and is implicated even less frequently in nasal infections. Infections of the maxillary canine teeth usually appear as labial sulcus swelling and less commonly as palatal swelling (Figure 12-7). However, the levator muscle of the upper lip overlies the apex of the canine root. The origin of the muscle is high in the canine fossa of the maxillary wall, whereas its insertion is the angle of the mouth, intermin- gling with the fibers of the orbicularis oris muscle of the mouth and the zygomatic muscle. If the canine infection perforates the lateral cortex of maxillary bone superior to the origin of the muscle, the potential canine space is affected. Whether this represents atrue fascial space or simply a muscular compartment is debatable, but abscess of this space requires surgical inter- vention. Canine space infections can cause marked cellulitis of the eyelids. Drainage is accomplished best through an intraoral approach, high in the maxillary labial vestibule by sharp and blunt dissection. This approach is an extension of that used for fenestration or apicoectomy of the canine Face • Buccal • Canine • Masticator • Masseteric compartment • Pterygoid compartment • Zygomaticotemporal compartment Suprahyoid • Sublingual • Submandibular • Submaxillary • Submental • Lateral pharyngeal • Peritonsillar Infrahyoid • Anterovisceral (pretracheal) Space of total neck • Retropharyngeal • Danger space • Space of carotid sheath • BOX 12-1 Fascial Spaces of Clinical Significance 211CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces root apex. Percutaneous drainage may be performed lateral to the nose, but this procedure does not afford dependent drainage and results in a visible scar. See Appendix I for an illustrative case. Cavernous Sinus Thrombosis Although ascending infection (venous sinus thrombosis) is not a fascial space infection, it can be of odontogenic ori- gin. Cavernous sinus infection, ascending from the maxil- lary teeth, upper lip, nose, or orbit through the valveless anterior and posterior facial veins, carries an extremely high mortality rate. Any patient with initial signs of proptosis, fever, obtunded state of consciousness, ophthalmople- gia, or paresis of the oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens nerves, especially after maxillary infections and exodontia, should have an emergency neurosurgical consultation (see Chapter 21).20 Buccal Space Mandibular and maxillary premolar and molar teeth tend to drain in a lateral and buccal direction. The relation of the root apices to the origins of the buccinator muscle (the outer surfaces of the alveolar process of the maxilla and mandible) determines whether infection exits intraorally in the buccal vestibule or extends deeply into the buccal space. Molar infections exiting superiorly to the maxillary origin of the muscle or inferiorly to the mandibular origin of the muscle enter the buccal space. The buccal space contains the buccal fat pad, the Stensen (parotid) duct, and the facial (external maxillary) artery. Infection of this space is diagnosed easily because of marked cheek swelling associated with a diseased molar or premolar tooth. When fluctuance occurs, it should be drained percutaneously. Attempts to direct fluctuance intraorally by warm rinses are futile, and intraoral drain- age through mucosa, submucosa, and buccinator muscle may be difficult. Cutaneous drainage should be performed inferior to the point of fluctuance with blunt dissection into the depth and extreme boundaries of the space. The purulent con- tents can expand the space to a surprising volume (Figures 12-8 and 12-9). The branches of the facial nerve should be avoided. The usual incision and drainage site is quite inferior to Stensen’s duct. Aspiration of this space is per- formed easily. Of special interest, and far from uncommon, is nonodon- togenic buccal space infection or buccal cellulitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae. This infection, usually seen in infants or children younger than 3 years, is characterized by high fever for at least 24 hours before the appearance of clin- ical signs. The rapid onset of dark red swelling can be easily • Figure 12-7 Chronic fistula high in the canine space from a periapi- cal infection of the maxillary canine tooth. (From Topazian RG, Gold- berg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infection, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2002, Saunders.) Masseter muscle Ramus of the mandible Buccinator muscle • Figure 12-8 Buccal space abscess anatomy. (From Hargreaves KM, Cohen S: Cohen’s pathways of the pulp, ed 10, St Louis, 2011, Mosby.) • Figure 12-9 Buccal space infection. Notice the massive swelling and erythema. 212 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region confused with an odontogenic infection or erysipelas. Otitis media frequently is also present or has occurred recently. Now commonly resistant to ampicillin, H. influenzae infection may respond well to amoxicillin-clavulanate (Aug- mentin) or a cephalosporin such as cefaclor. This process can occur in older children (Figure 12-10). Recurrent buccal space abscesses can occur as a complica- tion of Crohn’s disease. This segmental transmural intestinal disease, whose clinical course includes intermittent abdomi- nal pain, fever, weight loss, and diarrhea, is characterized by inflammatory granulomas, which can occur throughout the entire length of the gastrointestinal tract, from the mouth to the anus. Granulomatous lesions and ulcerations of the buccal mucosa can progress to true buccal space abscesses. A high recurrence rate of the granulomas or new abscess formation is possible despite antibiotic, corticosteroid, or surgical therapy. See Appendix I for an illustrative case. Masticator Spaces The masticator spaces (masseteric, pterygoid, and temporal) are well differentiated, but communicate with each other and with the buccal, submandibular, and parapharyngeal spaces. Infection may be confined to any one of these com- partments or may spread rather readily to any or all the other compartments. Of the muscles of mastication, only the outer surface of the masseter and the inner surface of the medial (internal) pterygoid are covered by true fascia. Sicher21 states that the temporal fascia is really the suspensory bracing of the zygomatic arch, rather than a muscle sheath. Although little space exists between the fibers of the masseter and tem- poralis muscles, considerable space is present between the temporalis muscle and the pterygoid muscles. The fatty con- nective tissue in this space extends anteriorly to the border of the buccinator muscle at the pterygomandibular raphe. The masticator space as a unit is bound by fascia. It con- tains the muscles of mastication, the internal maxillary artery, and the mandibular nerve. If subdivided, the boundaries of the masseteric compartment are the masseter muscle later- ally and the mandibular ascending ramus medially, whereas the pterygoid compartment is bounded medially by the pterygoid muscles and laterally by the mandible. Both com- partments communicate freely with the superficial and deep temporal pouches superiorly, the buccal space anteriorly, and the lateral pharyngeal spaces posteriorly. Extension of infec- tion into parotid and submandibular spaces can also occur. Infection of the masticator space occurs most frequently from molar teeth, and infections of the third molars (wis- dom teeth) are implicated most commonly as the cause. Pericoronitis of the gingival flap of third molars or caries- induced dental abscesses usually can be found in cases of masticator space infection. Infections of this space also have been reported as a result of contaminated mandibular block anesthetic injections, or infection may spread to this space from nearby contiguous spaces. Infection of the masticator space also can result from direct trauma to or through the muscles of mastication or surgery in the area (e.g., after tem- poral cranial flaps are made for neurosurgery or following orthognathic surgery). Infratemporal space infections also can occur as a result of temporomandibular joint surgery or arthroscopy. The pos- tulated mechanism is contamination from the external audi- tory canal flora (streptococci, staphylococci, Haemophilus, Proteus, and Pseudomonas organisms). Clinically the hallmark of masticator space infection is trismus, the sine qua non of masticator space infection. If trismus is not present, these spaces are uninvolved with the infectious process. An exception would be infection in a patient who is immunosuppressed, who might not exhibitthe classic signs of inflammation or the unique signs of deep space infection. Swelling may not be a prominent sign of masticator space infection, especially in the masseteric compartment. In this area, the infectious process exists deep to large muscle masses that obscure or prevent much observable swelling. This process distinctly contrasts with infections of the buc- cal space, in which swelling is the cardinal sign of infection. Surgical access to the various compartments of the masti- cator space is complicated by the containment of the infec- tious process by the muscle masses. Although drainage of the entire masticator space from the intraoral space is pos- sible and occasionally practical, access from an extraoral incision is easier technically and more prudent. Some sug- gest an approach to all compartments through an incision along the pterygomandibular raphe. This incision is techni- cally possible in a cadaver, but is less feasible in an infected patient with trismus. In such patients, the oral approach could compromise the airway postoperatively because of persistent bloody or purulent oozing, and intraoral drains • Figure 12-10 Buccal cellulitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae after recent otitis media. (From Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infection, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2002, Saunders.) 213CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces may be difficult to maintain and can be aspirated if loosened inadvertently. The masseteric and pterygoid compartments can be entered by superficial sharp and deep blunt dissection at the external angle of the mandible, avoiding the mandibular branch of the facial nerve. This approach allows dependent drainage of both spaces at the insertion of the muscle sling on the inferior border at the mandibular angle. Adequate local anesthesia can be accomplished at the mandibular angle (Figures 12-11 and 12-12). The temporal spaces, although accessible through Sich- er’s intraoral incision, also can be drained percutaneously through an incision slightly superior to the zygomatic arch. The incision should be made parallel to the zygomatic arch and therefore parallel to the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve rather than perpendicular to it. See Appendix I for an illustrative case. Submandibular and Sublingual Spaces The submandibular (submaxillary) and sublingual spaces, although distinct anatomically, should be considered as a surgical unit because of their proximity and frequent dual involvement in odontogenic infection. Some confusion in nomenclature exists because some anatomists describe these spaces as compartments of the “submandibular space.” The mylohyoid muscle, which forms the floor of the oral cavity, is the key to the diagnosis and surgical management of these space infections. Separating the sublingual space above from the submandibular space below is the mylo- hyoid muscle, which attaches to the lingual surface of the mandible in an obliquely downward line from posterior to anterior. Thus, the root apices of the premolar and first molar teeth usually are superior to this attachment. As a result, lingual perforations of infections from these teeth penetrate into the more superior (sublingual) compartment (see Figure 12-3). Only loose connective tissue rather than true fascia actually separates one side of the floor of the mouth from the other, an anatomic situation that permits infection to spread bilaterally with ease. Anteriorly, the sublingual space communicates with the submental space. In this area the sublingual space can be invaded by infection from incisor teeth, especially from periodontal infection. Posteriorly, the sublingual space com- municates with the lateral pharyngeal spaces, in the neigh- borhood of the posterior edge of the mylohyoid muscle and the lesser wings of the hyoid bone. Infection of the sublingual space appears clinically as brawny, erythematous, tender swelling of the floor of the mouth, beginning close to the mandible and spreading toward the midline or beyond. Some elevation of the tongue may be noted in late cases (Figure 12-13). Infection must be differentiated from the cellulitis that might accompany an impacted sialolith in the Wharton duct. Surgical drainage of the sublingual space should be per- formed intraorally by an incision through the mucosa paral- lel to the Wharton duct bilaterally. If the submandibular space is to be drained, both spaces can be reached through a submandibular approach. • Figure 12-11 Masticator space infection in a 5-year-old child caused by an infection from a deciduous mandibular molar. (From Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infection, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2002, Saunders.) • Figure 12-12 Incision and drainage of a masticator space of the child in Figure 12-11. Purulent flow occurred after blunt penetration of the masseteric compartment. (From Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infection, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2002, Saunders.) • Figure 12-13 Clinical appearance of a sublingual space infection with elevation of the tongue by indurated sublingual tissue. 214 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region The submandibular space is separated from the overly- ing sublingual space by the fibers of the mylohyoid muscle. Odontogenic infections of this space are commonly caused by the second and third molar teeth (and, rarely, the first molar), inasmuch as their root apices lie inferior to the mylohyoid line of muscle attachment. The space is bounded laterally by the submandibular skin, superficial fascia, pla- tysma muscle, superficial layer of deep cervical fascia, and the lower border of the mandible. The contents of the sub- mandibular space include the submandibular salivary gland and its lymph nodes, the facial (external maxillary) artery, the proximal portion of the Wharton duct, and the lingual and hypoglossal nerves as they course deep to the subman- dibular gland on the inferior surface of the mylohyoid mus- cle (Figures 12-14 and 12-15). Diagnosis of submandibular space infection is made by finding the typical swelling of the space, either brawny or soft, and correlating it with the presence of a diseased mandibular molar. Infection can be related to sepsis in an adjoining space, such as the sublingual, the submental, or the masticator space. Conversely, infection can spread from the submandibular space into any contiguous space, includ- ing the pharyngeal spaces. The infectious process commonly spreads across the midline into the contralateral subman- dibular space. If spread is bilateral and involves all subman- dibular and sublingual spaces and the submental space, the result is the well-known Ludwig’s angina. Differential diagnosis should include acute sialadenitis, sublingual trauma or foreign body, and submandibular lymphadenitis; these can produce a secondary overlying cel- lulitis that further confuses the diagnosis. Therapy for submandibular space odontogenic infection includes surgical drainage, antibiotics, and definitive care of the primary dental infection. Incision is performed through the skin below and parallel to the mandible. Blunt dissec- tion is carried to the depths of the space and to its anterior and posterior margins. Deep abscess loculations should be entered with a small closed clamp, probing in all directions while attempting to avoid damage to the submandibular gland, the facial artery, and the lingual nerve. The contralat- eral space should not be entered unless it is involved in the infection; if necessary, however, drains can be placed into both sides, as in the treatment of Ludwig’s angina. See Appendix I for an illustrative case. Submental Space A potential fascial space exists in the chin and occasionally becomes infected, either directly from a mandibular incisor or indirectly from the submandibular space. The submental space islocated below the chin and is bound above by the skin and the chin (mentalis) muscles, laterally by the ante- rior bellies of the digastric muscles, deeply by the mylohyoid muscle, and superiorly by the deep cervical fascia, the pla- tysma muscle, the superficial fascia, and the skin. Submental infection can spread easily to either or both submandibular spaces. If infection from the incisors exits labially through the mandibular bone, inferior to the muscle attachments, then the submental space becomes involved. The chin appears grossly swollen and is firm and erythematous (Figure 12-16). Percutaneous surgical drainage is the most effective approach. A horizontal incision in the most inferior por- tion of the chin, in a natural skin crease, provides depen- dent drainage and the most cosmetically acceptable scar. The space can be drained orally through the mentalis muscle through the labial vestibule, but dependent drainage cannot be established from this approach. See Appendix I for an illustrative case. Infections Associated with Impacted Third Molar Teeth Lower third molars are a frequent cause of infection, even in otherwise healthy patients. In Western society, where Buccinator muscle Mylohyoid muscle Platysma muscle • Figure 12-14 Schematic drawing of a submandibular space infec- tion originating from a mandibular molar tooth. Surgical drainage is accomplished through skin and platysma muscle. (From Hargreaves KM, Cohen S: Cohen’s pathways of the pulp, ed 10, St Louis, 2011, Mosby.) • Figure 12-15 Clinical appearance of a submandibular infection. 215CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces contemporary dental care and the widespread use of fluo- ridated drinking water have resulted in the remarkable decrease in dental caries and prevention of early loss of first and second molar teeth, a high rate of impacted third molars has resulted. Impaction is often associated with pericoronal infection (Figure 12-17). Bacteriologically the profuse colo- nization under the moist, poorly oxygenated pericoronal flap consists of the usual mixed aerobic-anaerobic flora, but can result in tissue destruction and pain to a level similar to that of acute necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis.22 The use of antibiotics is recommended for third molar pericoronitis if body temperature is elevated or if trismus or adenopathy are present. Initially, gentle mechanical irrigation and debride- ment can be useful, as are incision and drainage, with extrac- tion of the maxillary third molar (or cuspal reduction) if it is in occlusion with the edematous mandibular flap. Lower extraction usually is delayed until the trismus has resolved sufficiently to permit surgical access. Pericoronitis occasionally spreads rapidly because of the anatomic location of the mandibular third molar at the crossroads of the masticator, submandibular, and buccal fascial spaces with adjacent anatomic access to contiguous parapharyngeal, parotid, submandibular, and other spaces (Figure 12-18).23 Unfortunately, the same potentially seri- ous sequelae exist as postextraction complications, which is an important issue in the risk/benefit ratio and medicolegal areas of surgery. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in third molar sur- gery is controversial. If pericoronitis is present at the time of surgery or has been present recently, antibiotic therapy is indicated. However, removal of the truly asymptomatic and completely impacted third molar fits the category of clean-contaminated rather than contaminated surgery, and data exist to support the efficacy of both the use and non- use of prophylactic antibiotics. If the mandibular marrow space has been widely exposed, especially during a lengthy extraction, “prophylactic” postoperative antibiotics would seem prudent. However, for true prophylaxis, the antibiotic ideally should be administered preoperatively.24 The use of antibiotics after third molar extraction has not altered the infection rate. Advocates and dissenters continue the ongo- ing clinical debate. • Figure 12-16 Submental space infection after an incision and drainage. • Figure 12-17 Pericoronitis of a mandibular third molar. Note the swelling extending to the lingual surface of the mandible. • Figure 12-18 Pan-space infection from a third molar, including buc- cal, parotid, masticator, submandibular, and sublingual spaces. (From Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infection, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2002, Saunders.) 216 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region Penicillin (or amoxicillin) remains the antibiotic of choice, administered as 2 g of amoxicillin orally 1 hour before the procedure and a second dose 2 hours after the initial dose, with no further doses given. Alternatively, 2 g of penicillin G can be given intravenously as a single dose. In patients who are allergic to penicillin, clindamycin, 600 mg orally or intravenously as a single dose, is suggested. The overall third molar postoperative infection rate ranges from 4.2 to 6.3% with or without antibiotics, but most studies are subject to challenge because they fail to dif- ferentiate which patients have a history of pericoronitis and whether the extraction sites are profusely irrigated.25 Ludwig’s Angina Ludwig’s angina is a firm, acute, toxic cellulitis of the sub- mandibular and sublingual spaces bilaterally and of the sub- mental space. As early as 1796, extraction of abscessed teeth was considered contraindicated because “it might give rise to extensive inflammation and angina, in a dangerous degree.” Three F’s became evident even before the first written description of the disease: it was to be feared, it rarely became fluctuant, and it often was fatal. A sensation of choking and suffocation (angina) often was combined with the name of the author (Ludwig) who fully described it in 1836.1 The original description of the disease has not been improved since the observations of Wilhelm Friedrich von Ludwig were published while he was court physician to the King of Wurttemberg and president of that king- dom’s medical association. His descriptive phrases ring true today, despite considerable improvements in therapy and mortality: . . . amidst the symptoms which herald the approach—an ery- sepalous angina, temperature swings . . . discomfort upon swal- lowing, there develops on one or both sides of the neck a firm connective tissue with which it comes in contact . . . it extends uniformly about the periphery of the neck . . . to a marked degree. It advances in similar fashion to involve the tissues which cover the small muscles between the larynx and the floor of the mouth . . . the tongue rests upon a red, indurated mass which feels like a hard ring adjacent to the inner surface of the jaw bone. It becomes difficult and painful to open the mouth . . . speech is impaired and hoarse . . . this is because the tongue is pressed backward and upwards, there is pressure upon the larynx . . . as the disease progresses . . . externally certain areas become, at times, softer . . . at other times more prominent and apparently fluctuant. Fever increases with morning exacerba- tions . . . swallowing continues to be difficult and the patient opens the mouth only with effort; dyspnea appears usually in paroxysms . . . and on the tenth to twelfth day of the disease, death occurs, with the patient in a comatose state with evi- dence of respiratory paralysis . . . there are nuances in the typi- cal picture of the disease . . . particularly the onset and severity of the local lesion. . . . Among the cases in which autopsy was permitted . . . there were found abscess cavities whose walls were made up of gangrenous partly decomposed masses of muscle . . . the periosteum of the inner surface of the jaw was loosened from the bone and was discolored. Ludwig refrained from suggesting a “scientifically valid” hypothesis of the causeof the disease, but stated that “it dif- ferentiates itself from other neck inflammations with symp- tomatic or idiopathic swelling of the salivary glands.”25a As therapy, he recommended local and general bloodletting, softening poultices, and external and internal use of mer- curials, vesicants, cathartics, and diuretics. He described the case of Fraulein N.N., who suffered both the disease and the therapy, including leeches, bran poultices, tartar emetic, dry heat, a gargle of althea and honey, almond oil, ipecac, and finally, “a piece of silver nitrate the size of a six Krenzer coin over the middle of the swelling . . . which had cre- ated a splendid necrosis.” Because of or despite the therapy (chemical incision and drainage), N.N. survived, and “three weeks after the onset, when the last traces of the induration could still be felt, the patient felt well and strong.” Almost 60 years passed before the causative relationship between dental disease and Ludwig’s angina was established. Carious rotten teeth were ubiquitous in Ludwig’s era, whereas his eponymous angina was comparatively uncom- mon; hence, he never recognized the association. Consider- ing that the germ theory of disease had yet to be postulated, antibiotics were undiscovered, anesthesia did not exist, and contemporary surgeons were reluctant to incise without the certainty of finding “laudable pus,” N.N. was indeed fortu- nate to have survived. Curiously, Ludwig did not survive a throat inflammation and he died in 1865 at the age of 75. Today, Ludwig’s angina is a disease primarily of dental origin. Dental infection has been reported as the causative factor in 90% of cases in some series, either as primary dental infection or as a postextraction phenomenon. As was stated in 1943, “The dentist who is unfortunate enough to have performed extraction on a patient who subsequently devel- ops Ludwig’s angina is more likely to have been inciden- tal to the train of events than to have been the responsible agent.”26 Other causative factors include submandibular gland sialadenitis, compound mandibular fracture, oral soft tissue lacerations, puncture wounds of the oral floor, and secondary infections of oral malignancies. Ludwig’s angina infection has been reported in a newborn. The term pseudo-Ludwig’s angina has been applied to these cases of nondental origin; they also are referred to as pseudo-Ludwig’s phenomena. Fortunately, the incidence of Ludwig’s angina remains low in this modern era of preventative dental care and antibi- otic therapy. In the preantibiotic era, a mortality rate greater than 50% was reported, but this was reduced to approxi- mately 5% with the use of penicillin. Most early cases prob- ably are aborted by the use of antibiotics before rapid, deep spread of infection occurs. Representing less than 1% of all admissions to oral-maxillofacial services, Ludwig’s angina is observed most frequently in the contemporary compro- mised host. If the disease is untreated, the mortality rate is close to 100%. A true Ludwig’s angina is an obligatory hospital admission. Bilateral infection of the sublingual and submandibu- lar spaces with brawny edema, an elevated tongue, airway 217CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces obstruction, and a paucity of pus are the clinical hallmarks of Ludwig’s angina. The submental space also is swollen, and sepsis can spread rapidly to involve the masticator and pharyngeal spaces. A veritable host of organisms have been implicated as the causative agents of this disease. Because Ludwig’s angina is commonly of dental origin, streptococci or mixed oral flora are the most commonly reported organisms from cultures of whatever exudate can be obtained after surgical drain- age. Contemporary reports of Ludwig’s angina have demon- strated the presence of staphylococci, gram-negative enteric organisms such as E. coli and Pseudomonas, and anaerobes, including Bacteroides and Peptostreptococcus species. The isolation of these organisms may indicate the changing oral flora of the antibiotic era or reflect more sophisticated modern culture techniques. Prevotella melaninogenicus, Pre- votella oralis, and Prevotella corrodens also have been isolated from patients with Ludwig’s angina or other odontogenic infections. Experimental data from studies of cutaneous infections similar to the ulcer of Meleney suggest that a synergistic or obligatory synergistic relationship may exist among anaerobes such as Prevotella (P. melaninogenicus), anaerobic streptococci, and fusospirochetes, all common organisms. Mixtures of oral organisms that did not include Prevotella could not create transmissible subcutaneous infections in experimental animals, whereas an infection was produced by the addition of that organism. Whatever the role of anaerobes, primary or synergistic, a search for them should not be omitted when culturing specimens from Ludwig’s angina or other serious odontogenic infec- tions (see Geisler et al27 and Chow et al28). Treatment of Ludwig’s angina includes early diagnosis of the incipient cases, maintenance of a patent airway, intense and prolonged antibiotic therapy, extraction of the affected teeth, hydration, and early surgical drainage (with a life in the balance, a quick extraction is more rational than time- consuming tooth salvage). Empirical antibiotic therapy (intravenous) for Ludwig’s angina should be intense; choices include penicillin plus metronidazole or clindamycin or imipenem used as single agents. Establishment and maintenance of an adequate air- way are the sine qua non of therapy. Death is more likely to occur early from airway obstruction than from sepsis. Tracheostomy has been almost routine during most of the twentieth century, but may prove difficult to perform in the late stage of the disease because of massive neck edema and tissue distortion. Attempts at blind endotracheal intu- bation can be time consuming, unsuccessful, and fraught with danger, especially if attempted by an inexperienced anesthesiologist, because of the swollen elevated tongue and glottic edema. The danger of rupturing a bulging lateral pharyngeal or retropharyngeal abscess exists if the infection involves these fascial spaces. Cervical soft tissue plain radio- graphs and CT scanning should be done before attempted tracheostomy, if time permits. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy is useful in the airway management of Ludwig’s angina but requires an anesthesiologist skilled in its use, and the patient must be cooperative and premedicated. Tracheal intubation with the patient under deep inhalation anesthesia may be successful, usually obviating the need for tracheostomy. The use of sedative and narcotic agents, which can cause more rapid respiratory deterioration, is not recommended (see Chapter 32). Although some authorities advocate high doses of antibiotics without surgery until fluctuance develops, in most surgeons’ experience, fully developed Ludwig’s angina requires prompt and deep surgical incision because fluctu- ance is uncommon and late. Ludwig’s angina is a diffuse cellulitis of deep fascia. Seventy percent of cases still require surgical intervention and drainage. The submandibular and sublingual spaces and secondarily involved spaces must be explored bilaterally. The masticator spaces must be drained if trismus is present. The prudent and experienced surgeon recognizes the wisdom of the maxim “a chance to cut is a chance to cure” when confronted with Ludwig’s angina. A horizontal incision midway between the chin and the hyoid bone was the classic approach to the surgical drainage of Ludwig’s angina, but this “cut-throat” incision has proved unnecessary and unaesthetic. Bilateral incision into the sub- mandibular spaces with blunt dissection to the midline suf- fices if bilateral drains meeting in the midline are placed. This maneuver, combined with drainage of the sublingual spaces,relieves the intense pressure of edematous tissue on the airway and provides specimens for Gram staining and culture (Figure 12-19). The platysma muscle and suprahyoid fasciae are incised by this approach, and the fascia of the submandibular gland is also entered. The mylohyoid muscle should be divided and the sublingual spaces entered. A closed clamp should be inserted through the median raphe of the mylohyoid muscle and advanced to the hyoid bone at the base of the tongue. Generally, little pus is obtained because the infection often represents cellulitis of the fascial spaces rather than true abscess formation. In some cases, especially late or fully developed ones, purulent flow is produced. • Figure 12-19 Surgical therapy for Ludwig’s angina involves incisions and placement of drains bilaterally into the submandibular spaces, meeting in the midline and draining the submental space. 218 PART 2 Infections of the Head, Neck, and Orofacial Region Needle aspiration of deep fascial space infections has been attempted, sometimes obviating open drainage procedures. However, Ludwig’s angina, basically a rapidly spreading, deep cellulitis without localization of pus or formation of fluctuance is not amenable to this technique, even if the needle is CT guided. Sequelae after adequate drainage and antibiotic therapy are uncommon. However, inadequate drainage or prema- ture closure of the surgical wounds can lead to reinfection. Late spread to other fascial spaces or generalized sepsis can occur and are ever-present dangers. Failure to extract the offending tooth could cause reinfection. Secondary revi- sion of scarring may be necessary for cosmetic reasons or to repair stenosis of the Wharton duct. The mortality rate for Ludwig’s angina has decreased since the advent of prompt surgical intervention, airway maintenance techniques, and antibiotic therapy. However, three fatal cases are discussed in Appendix I to illustrate the potential or actual lethality of this disease. Pharyngeal Space Infection The lateral pharyngeal space (pharyngomaxillary space) is a lateral neck space shaped like an inverted cone, with its base at the skull and its apex at the hyoid bone. Its medial wall is contiguous with the carotid sheath, and it lies deep to the pha- ryngeal constrictor muscle. It is divided, for surgical and ana- tomic purposes, into anterior and posterior compartments. Infections of the lateral pharyngeal space can result from pharyngitis, tonsillitis, parotitis, otitis, mastoiditis, and den- tal infection, especially if the masticator spaces are primarily infected. Herpetic gingivostomatitis involving pericoronal tissue has also been reported as a cause of the lateral pharyn- geal abscess. If the anterior compartment becomes infected, the patient exhibits pain, fever, chills, medial bulging of the lateral pharyngeal wall with deviation of the palatal uvula from the midline, dysphagia, swelling below the angle of the mandible, and usually trismus (Figure 12-20). Infection of the posterior compartment is noted for absence of tris- mus and visible swelling, but respiratory obstruction, septic thrombosis of the internal jugular vein, and carotid artery hemorrhage can occur in patients at a late stage of infec- tion. CT and magnetic resonance imaging may prove useful in diagnosing lateral pharyngeal infections and may reveal confluence with other deep space infections and septic ero- sion of the wall of the great vessels. Therapy consists of antibiotics, surgical drainage, and tracheostomy if indicated. The surgical approach may be oral, by incision of the lateral pharyngeal wall, or exter- nal, by exposure of the carotid sheath near the lateral tip of the hyoid bone after retraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. Blunt dissection along the posterior border of the digastric muscle leads to the lateral pharyngeal space. In the combined intraoral and extraoral approach, a mucosal inci- sion is made lateral to the pterygomandibular raphe, and a large curved clamp is passed medial to the medial ptery- goid muscle in a posterior-inferior direction. The tip of the clamp is delivered through the skin by a cutaneous incision between the angle of the mandible and the sternocleidomas- toid muscle. See Appendix I for an illustrative case. Retropharyngeal Space The esophagus and trachea are enclosed by the middle layer of the deep cervical fascia. A thick strand of con- nective tissue extends laterally from the esophagus to the carotid sheath, thus creating an anterior neck compart- ment known as the pretracheal (previsceral) space and a posterior or retropharyngeal (retrovisceral) space. The pos- terior space lies behind the esophagus and pharynx and extends inferiorly to the upper mediastinum and superi- orly to the base of the skull. Clinically, retropharyngeal space infections can result most commonly from nasal and pharyngeal infections in children (tonsillitis), dental infection diffusing through contiguous spaces, esophageal trauma or foreign bodies, and tuberculosis. Infection can also reach this space through the lymphatics to involve the retropharyngeal lymph nodes. Dysphagia, dyspnea, nuchal rigidity, esophageal regurgita- tion, and fever characterize infections of the retropharyngeal space. If the pharynx can be visualized, a bulging of the pos- terior wall may be observed and is usually more prominent unilaterally because of the adherence of the median raphe of the prevertebral fascia. Lateral soft tissue radiographs of the neck are extremely useful and may reveal considerable wid- ening of the retropharyngeal space, well beyond the 3- to 6-mm width in normal adults at the second vertebra (or >14 mm in children; Figure 12-21). In adults, the space width/ vertebra ratio is 6 mm at C2 and 20 mm at C6. The pres- ence of gas in the prevertebral soft tissues and the loss of the normal lordotic curvature of the cervical spine also may be observed on plain radiographs and CT scans. CT scans reveal the presence of the infection in the retropharyngeal space and its inferior extent. • Figure 12-20 Lateral pharyngeal space abscess occurring late after a third molar extraction. Note the bulging of the lateral pharyngeal wall, soft palate, and tonsillar area with displacement of the uvula. (From Topazian RG, Goldberg MH, Hupp JR: Oral and maxillofacial infection, ed 4, Philadelphia, 2002, Saunders.) 219CHAPTER 12 Odontogenic Infections of the Fascial Spaces Although some reports indicate that 10 to 40% of retro- pharyngeal infections resolve with only medical management, these cases reflect early diagnosis and antibiotic therapy. Infec- tion of the retropharyngeal space usually requires prompt surgical drainage and allows little time for delay, debate, or decision by committee. Because many anesthesiologists are reluctant to risk aspiration or airway obstruction by pus pouring from the ruptured space during passage of an endo- tracheal tube, tracheostomy may be indicated. However, drainage has been performed transorally with the patient under local anesthesia in the extreme Trendelenburg position and with constant suctioning. In the transoral technique, an incision is made through the midline of the posterior pharyn- geal mucosa, and the abscess is opened by blunt dissection. An external approach generally provides more dependent drainage. An incision is made along the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and parallel to it, inferior to the hyoid bone. This muscle and the carotid sheath are retracted laterally, and blunt finger dissection is carried deeply, avoiding the hypoglossal nerve, to the level of the hypopharynx. Blunt finger dissection deep to the inferior constrictor muscles opens the retropharyngeal space abscess. Deep drains are placed and maintained until all clinical and laboratory signs of infection are no longer apparent. Needle aspiration with CT scan guidance has avoided
Compartilhar