Pedro, a lawyer, is criminally investigated, together with Antonio, his former client, and Matheus, a judge of the district, due to their alleged p...

Pedro, a lawyer, is criminally investigated, together with Antonio, his former client, and Matheus, a judge of the district, due to their alleged participation in fraudulent acts that resulted in the payment of undue social security benefits. In the context of the investigations, the competent judicial authority determines a precautionary measure of search and seizure that results in a violation of Pedro's workplace. Later, Pedro is consulted by the body responsible for the criminal investigation about his interest in entering into a plea bargain agreement. Regarding these measures, choose the correct statement.


a) The search and seizure measure executed in Pedro's workplace is valid if based exclusively on statements from another collaborator, without confirmation by other means of proof.
b) In exceptional cases, documents, media, and objects belonging to other clients of Pedro may be used in the investigation.
c) If Pedro makes a plea bargain agreement against Antonio, such an act will result in a disciplinary process, which may culminate in the application of the exclusion penalty.
d) If Pedro makes a plea bargain agreement against Matheus, he will not be subject to the penalties related to the crime of violation of professional secrecy.