Assuming the presented case and the applicable measure, choose the correct statement. Pablo can file a criminal review on behalf of Frida, even w...

Assuming the presented case and the applicable measure, choose the correct statement.


Pablo can file a criminal review on behalf of Frida, even without her agreement. The decision that judges the criminal review is subject to, for example, clarification appeals, but not appeals. Substitutive HC of the criminal review is admissible. If Frida had been acquitted due to lack of evidence, it would be possible to file a criminal review to request a change in the acquittal's basis. If the sentence given to Frida, in the concrete case, had convicted her but, at the same time, recognized the prescription of the claim, a criminal review would be inadmissible.
The criminal review is inadmissible because the sentence has already become res judicata. Pablo can file a criminal review on behalf of Frida, even without her agreement. The decision that judges the criminal review is subject to, for example, clarification appeals, but not appeals. Substitutive HC of the criminal review is admissible. If Frida had been acquitted due to lack of evidence, it would be possible to file a criminal review to request a change in the acquittal's basis.
Pablo can file a criminal review on behalf of Frida, even without her agreement. The decision that judges the criminal review is subject to, for example, clarification appeals, but not appeals. Substitutive HC of the criminal review is inadmissible. If Frida had been acquitted due to lack of evidence, it would be possible to file a criminal review to request a change in the acquittal's basis. If the sentence given to Frida, in the concrete case, had convicted her but, at the same time, recognized the prescription of the claim, a criminal review would be inadmissible. The criminal review is the only measure that can be taken in this case.
Pablo cannot file a criminal review on behalf of Frida, as the sentence has already become res judicata. The decision that judges the criminal review is subject to, for example, clarification appeals, but not appeals. Substitutive HC of the criminal review is inadmissible. If Frida had been acquitted due to lack of evidence, it would be possible to file a criminal review to request a change in the acquittal's basis. If the sentence given to Frida, in the concrete case, had convicted her but, at the same time, recognized the prescription of the claim, a criminal review would be inadmissible.