Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
1. Introduction 2. Molecular biology and oncogenic functions of PIM1 3. PIM1 expression in human cancer diseases 4. Small molecule inhibitors of PIM1 kinase 5. Expert opinion Review PIM1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy Anna Lena Merkel, Eric Meggers & Matthias Ocker† Philipps University Marburg, Institute for Surgical Research, Marburg, Germany Introduction: Inhibition of protein kinases has become a standard of modern clinical oncology. PIM1 belongs to a novel class of serine/threonine kinases with distinct molecular and biochemical features regulating various onco- genic pathways, for example hypoxia response, cell cycle progression and apoptosis resistance. PIM1 is overexpressed in human cancer diseases and has been associated with metastasis and overall treatment response; in experimental models, inhibition of PIM1 suppressed cell proliferation and migration, induced apoptotic cell death and synergized with other chemotherapeutic agents. Areas covered: A PubMed literature search was performed to review the cur- rently available data on PIM1 expression, regulation and targets; its implica- tion in different types of cancer and its impact on prognosis are described. We present ATP-competitive PIM1 inhibitors and the state of the art of PIM1 inhibitor design. Finally, we highlight the development of the unusual class of highly selective and potent organometallic PIM1 inhibitors. Expert opinion: As PIM1 possesses oncogenic functions and is overexpressed in various kinds of cancer diseases, its inhibition provides a new option in cancer therapy. Based on the ability of highly selective organometallic PIM1 inhibitors, promising in vivo applicability is expected. Keywords: cancer, inhibitors, metal complexes, PIM1, serine/threonine kinase Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] 1. Introduction Malignant tumors continue to represent a global medical burden with more than 12 million new cases estimated per year and more than 7 million cancer- related deaths overall [1]. In Western countries, while cardiovascular diseases show a strong decline as a cause of death, cancer death rates remained stable over the past decades and represent the most common cause of death at the age of 40 -- 79 [2]. The increasing identification and understanding of molecular pathways altered in cancer diseases has recently paved the way for the development of more specific anticancer agents, also known as targeted therapies [3,4]. Especially, inhibi- tors of growth factors and their receptor signaling have been investigated intensively and led to the approval of monoclonal antibodies (e.g., bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab) or small molecule kinase inhibitors (e.g., erlotinib, sunitinib or sor- afenib) [5]. This latter class of compounds can effectively target intracellular tyrosine kinases [6]. Yet, the specificity of these molecules is typically quite low due to the high homology of tyrosine kinase families [7] and the redundancy of these pathways allows cancer cells to either bypass the inhibited kinase or to develop resistance against a specific inhibitor. Recently, the serine/threonine kinase family has entered the focus of research. Small molecule inhibitors have been developed and tested in clinical trials for some members of this family, for example, the mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) complexes [8-10], polo-like kinases [11,12] or aurora kinases [13-15]. However, the overall efficacy of these inhibitors still 10.1517/13543784.2012.668527 © 2012 Informa UK, Ltd. ISSN 1354-3784 1 All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or in part not permitted E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. remains unsatisfying, with only low response rates and rather marginal improvements concerning overall survival in clinical trials [16-20]. Besides these well-established serine/threonine kinases, members of the PIM kinase family have recently been described to possess oncogenic and survival promoting prop- erties [21,22]. We will here review the biological functions and medical implications of PIM1 kinase expression in cancer cells and highlight novel means of therapeutic intervention of PIM1 activity including organometallic complexes to specifi- cally inhibit PIM1 activity. 2. Molecular biology and oncogenic functions of PIM1 2.1 Expression of PIM1 and its regulation In 1984, PIM1 was identified as a common integration site for murine leukemia virus [23]; subsequently, its serine/ threonine kinase activity was described [24]. PIM1 is expressed in two isoforms: a 34 kDa short variant and a 44 kDa long form; these two isoforms are synthesized by alternative trans- lation initiation (Figure 1) [25]. As it is a stress--response kinase, its expression can be induced by various cytokines, mitogens and hormones such as GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-2, IL-3, IL-5, IL-7, IL-9, IL-12, IL-15, erythropoietin, Con A, PMA, inter- feron g , steel cell factor and prolactin [26]. The most important pathways in the activation of PIM1 expression are Jak- STAT [27] and NF-kB [28]. Another transcription factor that can induce the expression of PIM1 is ERG, which plays a role in the initial stages of prostate carcinogenesis [29]. In solid tumors, the expression of PIM1 in response to hypoxia plays a crucial role and is HIF-1a dependent [28]. Furthermore, PIM1 is a target of different miRNAs, such as miR1 [30], miR33a [31] and miR328 [32], which reduce the translation of PIM1-mRNA or induce its degradation. In contrast to other kinases, PIM1 is constitutively active [33]. Its activity is regulated at the level of expression and stability. In normal peripheral blood lymphocytes, the half-life of PIM1 is about 5 min, while it is prolonged in the chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 (20 min) [34]. PIM1 is able to autophosphorylate [35], although the functional consequences of this phosphorylation still need to be investigated. One study reports that PIM1 can also be phosphorylated at Tyr218 by ETK, which enhances PIM1 activity [36]. PIM1 is degraded via the ubiquitin- proteasome pathway and can be protected from proteasomal degradation by the binding of heat shock protein Hsp90 [37]. In contrast, Hsp70 binds only to ubiquitinated PIM1 and promotes its degradation [37]. Additionally, the binding of the phosphatase PP2A mediates PIM1 dephos- phorylation, ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation and is therefore a negative regulator [38]. 2.2 Targets and functions of PIM1 Several proteins and pathways with oncogenic properties, for example cell cycle regulation and apoptosis control, have been identified as targets of PIM1 kinase activity. PIM1 has been shown to stimulate cell cycle progression at various stages (Figure 2A). While phosphorylation of Cdc25A leads to enhanced G1/S transition [39], phosphorylation of Cdc25C induces increased G2/M transition [40]. A different way of how PIM1 regulates Cdc25C activity is the phosphor- ylation of C-TAK1, which induces its nuclear export and ena- bles Cdc25C to be active [41]. Another cell-cycle-related target of PIM1 is the CDK inhibitor p21cip1/waf1. Here, phosphory- lation at Thr145 leads to the nuclear export and inactivation of p21cip1/waf1 [42]. The phosphorylation of the CDK inhibitor p27Kip1 at Thr157 and Thr198 induces its proteasomal degra- dation and cell cycle progression. Additionally, the transcrip- tion of p27Kip1 is reduced due to the phosphorylation and inactivation of the transcription factors FoxO1a and FoxO3a [43]. Another mechanism of p27Kip1 regulation is the phosphorylation of its ubiquitin ligase Skp2 at Thr417 by PIM1 which leads to Skp2 stabilization and p27Kip1 degradation [44,45]. Moreover, PIM1 plays a role in promoting mitosis as it interacts with NuMA, dynein/ dynactin and HP1b. Here, PIM1 bridges the kinetochores via HP1b to the spindle assembly complex [46]. In additionto controlling cell growth pathways, PIM1 is able to block apoptotic cell death and thus can act as an onco- genic survival factor (Figure 2B). Phosphorylation of the pro-apoptotic protein Bad at Ser112 leads to proteasomal degradation and shifts the apoptosis threshold towards sur- vival [47]. The inactivation of ASK1 through phosphorylation at Ser83 leads to decreased kinase activity and subsequently less phosphorylation of the stress kinases JNK and p38, which is associated with less caspase 3 activation and reduced cell death [48]. Apoptosis can also be blocked by PIM1 via the phosphorylation of PRAS40 at Thr246, which leads to the dissociation of PRAS40 from the mTOR complex and increases mTOR kinase activity and with increased phosphor- ylation of the mTOR downstream targets 4EBP1 and p70S6Kinase [49]. Interestingly, activation of mTOR has Article highlights. . The serine/threonine kinase PIM1 regulates numerous oncogenic processes like hypoxia response, cell survival, apoptosis and migration in cancer cells. . PIM1 is commonly overexpressed in human cancers and represents an interesting novel therapeutic target. . Inhibition of PIM1 inhibits cancer cell growth and migration synergistically with other chemotherapeutic agents. . Highly potent and selective organic and organometallic PIM1 inhibitors are available which all target the ATP binding site in an ATP competitive fashion. . Binding of PIM1 inhibitors can be grouped into two classes: ATP-mimics and non-hinge binders. This box summarizes key points contained in the article. A. L. Merkel et al. 2 Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. been shown to interfere also with autophagy pathways, which indicate additional roles of PIM1 in energy metabolism and stress response [50,51]. Moreover, PIM1 influences the activity of different tran- scriptional regulators, for example NFATc1, p100, RUNX, SOCS1, RelA/p65, c-Myb and c-Myc (reviewed in [52]). The phosphorylation of c-Myc at Ser62 and Ser329 increases pro- tein stability and thereby the transcriptional activity. c-Myc recruits PIM1 to the E boxes of its target genes, in which PIM1-dependent phosphorylation of histone H3 on Ser10 (H3S10) contributes to the activation of target genes and cellu- lar transformation [53]. Elevated PIM1 levels seem to induce the p53 pathway in different cancer cell lines and murine embry- onic fibroblasts. Here, PIM1 associates with and phosphory- lates Mdm2 at Ser166 and Ser186 leading to stabilization of Mdm2 and p53. PIM1 also induces endogenous ARF, p53, Mdm2 and p21cip1/waf1 in primary murine embryonic fibroblasts and stimulates oncogene-induced senescence [54]. It has also been described that the overexpression of PIM1 can inhibit cell and tumor growth by inducing senescence and DNA damage in a p53-dependent manner in human prostate cancer cells [55]. Moreover, PIM1 can mediate chemoresistance through the phosphorylation of the efflux transporter and puta- tive stem cell marker BCRP/ABCG2 at Thr362 and the knock- down of PIM1 resensitized prostate cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs [56]. Additionally, PIM1 plays a role in hypoxia-induced chemoresistance [57] and tumor forma- tion [51]. In line with this, PIM1 has also been shown to be involved in regulating homing processes of hematopoietic cells by interacting with the CXCR4-CXCL12 system [58], which is also an important regulator of solid tumor metastasis formation and thus indicates an additional oncogenic function for PIM1, which needs to be elucidated further. 3. PIM1 expression in human cancer diseases Besides its association with murine leukemia [59,60], alterations in PIM1 signaling have been found in various HIF-1α Hypoxia Cytokines, mitogens, hormones AKT/PKB PIM1 PIM1 PIM1 ETKPIM1 PP2A +p +p PIM1 p p Hsp90 Proteasome Hsp70 PIM1 S (34 kDa) PIM1 L (44 kDa) AAA miR1 miR33a miR328 Biological functions PI3K JAK STAT NF-κB PIM1 Ubi Ubi Ubi Ubi Figure 1. Molecular regulation of PIM1 expression and functions. Various stimuli like hypoxia or growth factors activate PIM1 expression via different signaling pathways. After transcription, PIM1 mRNA can be destabilized by different miRNAs or be expressed as two isoforms of PIM1. PIM1 can exert its biological functions either alone or as a complex with Hsp90. PIM1 is able to autophosphorylate and can be phosphorylated by ETK at a different position. Inactivation of PIM1 is mediated by complex formation with Hsp70 or after dephosphorylation by PP2A, both of which lead to polyubiquitination and subsequent degradation via the proteasome. PIM1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] 3 E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. human tumor diseases too [52,61]. In hematologic malignan- cies, PIM1 expression correlated with poor prognosis in var- ious leukemias [62], mantle cell lymphoma [63] and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [64]. In solid tumors, overexpression of PIM1 has been detected in bladder cancer (with higher levels in invasive than in non-invasive cancers) [65] and in prostate cancer specimens, where it was also correlated with poor prognosis and therapy response [66-70]. Similar findings were obtained for esophageal [71] and gastric cancer [72,73], where PIM1 was upregulated after H. pylori infection in a cell culture model [74] and in gastric epithelia from patients [75]. In head and neck cancer, PIM1 was highly p-Bad Bcl2 JNK Caspase 3 function Induction of apoptosis Increased metabolism p-4EBP1 p-p70S6K p38 mTOR p-ASK1 PIM1 p-PRAS40 T ar ge t m ol ec ul es D ow ns tr ea m ef fe ct s p-c-Myc p-Cdc25A p-Cdc25C PIM1 G1/S-transition G2/M-transition Incresed transcription Degradation Active cyclin/Cdk Cell cycle progression Kinetochore assembly T ar ge t m ol ec ul es D ow ns tr ea m ef fe ct s p-NuMA p-HP1β p-dynein/ p-dynactin p-p21Cip1/Waf1 p-p27kip1 A. B. Figure 2. Oncogenic signaling pathways of PIM1. A. Cell cycle control by PIM1. Phosphorylation of target molecules leads to progression of the cell cycle. PIM1-mediated phosphorylation of cell cycle inhibitors activates cyclin/Cdk complexes, stimulates cell cycle checkpoint transitions and facilitates the kinetochore assembly as a prerequisite for mitotic division. Additionally, the transcription of c-Myc target genes is activated. B. Inhibition of apoptosis by PIM1 is mediated via phosphorylation of target molecules like Bad, ASK1 or PRAS40 which inhibit pro-apoptotic functions (e.g., the JNK/p38-caspase 3 axis) or stimulate anti-apoptotic (Bcl2) and pro-survival (mTOR) pathways. A. L. Merkel et al. 4 Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. expressed in more advanced stages and associated with poor prognosis and lymph node metastasis [76,77]. Here, PIM1 expression was also shown to be predictive for response to radiation therapy [78]. Interestingly, PIM1 was also found as a tumor-associated antigen in blood from colo- rectal cancer patients and has been proposed as a sensitive novel biomarker for this disease [79]. In contrast to these findings, a significant downregulation of PIM1 mRNA was found in primary non-small-cell lung cancer and PIM1 was even further suppressed in lymph node metastases compared with nodal negative tumors [80]. Elevated expression of PIM1 has also been described for patients with pancreatic cancer. Yet, high levels of PIM1 mRNA were associated with a prolonged median survivalof 23.4 months compared with 13.8 months in patients with low PIM1 mRNA [81]. This is surprising as PIM1 has been shown to be directly cor- related to oncogenic K-ras mutations and hypoxia also in pancreatic cancer models [51,82]. PIM1 was also reported to contribute to radio- and chemotherapy resistance in pancre- atic [83], prostate [84], head and neck [78] or lung cancer [85], which confirms the above described oncogenic properties in modulating hypoxia response or apoptosis signaling in tumor cells [57]. The change in PIM1 expression cannot be explained by gene rearrangements or amplification [62,86], although somatic hypermutations have been described in different lympho- mas [87,88]; also this cannot be the reason for increased PIM1 expression. 4. Small molecule inhibitors of PIM1 kinase All reported small-molecule PIM1 inhibitors are ATP- competitive binders. Crystal structures of PIM1 reveal the typical two-lobe protein kinase architecture connected by a so-called hinge region, with the catalytic ATP- binding domain positioned in a deep intervening cleft (Figure 3) [33,35,89-92]. The N-terminal lobe is comprised pri- marily of anti-parallel b-sheets and the C-terminal lobe mainly of a-helices. Unique features of PIM1 are a b-hairpin insert located at N-terminal to helix aC and, most importantly, the presence of a proline residue at position 123 within the hinge region. Almost all protein kinases form two canonical hydrogen bonds between the backbone of the hinge region and the adenine nucleobase of ATP, whereas in PIM kinases one hydrogen bond is prevented by this proline residue, which is probably responsible for the relatively high Km value for ATP. While no crystal structure has been reported yet for PIM3, PIM1 and PIM2 adopt constitutively active conformations in their crystal structures, regardless of the phosphorylation state of the activation segment [93]. Several classes of PIM1 inhibitors have been described which cover a significant number of different chemical core structures, ranging from indolocarbazoles, bisindolylmalei- mides, naphthyridines, pyridazines and isoxazoles to thiazoli- dine-2,4-diones, thienopyrimidinones, pyridones and isoxazoloquinolines (Figure 4) [90-92,94-108]. Staurosporine ana- logs, inhibitors of casein kinases, PKC or phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase have a rather broad and unspecific profile on PIM1 inhibition [52,109]. Recently, more specific imidazopyri- dazine derivatives like ETP-45299 [110], K00135 [107] or SGI-1776 [111,112] or the dihydropyrrolocarbazole derivative DHPCC-9 [100,113] have been designed [114]. A monoclonal anti-PIM1 antibody, which binds to cytosolic, nuclear and membranous PIM1 and induces apoptosis in human and murine cancer cells has been described in preclinical mod- els [115]. So far, only SGI-1776 has been investigated in pre- clinical toxicity screening [116] and in two early phase clinical trials against refractory leukemia (NCT01239108), lym- phoma or prostate cancer (NCT00848601). All mentioned compounds have been shown to inhibit cell proliferation and migration and to influence apoptosis by resensitizing tumor cells to conventional chemotherapeutic agents [110,112,117] or small-molecule kinase inhibitors [118] at low micromolar concentrations. While all reported compounds have an ATP-competitive mode of action on inhibiting PIM1, one can classify them into two distinct binding modes: close ATP mimics and non-hinge binders. The unselective broad-spectrum protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine and its maleimide analogs such as bisindolylmaleimides or the class of organometallic C-terminal lobe A-loop Hinge N-terminal lobe Arg122 Pro123 Glu121 P-loop b-hairpin insertaC Figure 3. PIM1 structure in complex with the non- hydrolyzable ATP analog AMPPNP (pdb code 1YXT). The hydrogen bond between the adenine base and the back- bone carbonyl group of Glu121 is highlighted. PIM1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] 5 E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. pyridocarbazole complexes represent the first class and closely mimic the binding of ATP to the hinge region. For example, Figure 5 shows the binding of the highly potent orga- noruthenium complex (S)-DW12 to the ATP binding site of PIM1 (IC50 = 0.2 nM at 100 µM ATP) [92]. The pyridocarba- zole heterocycle mimics the hydrogen-bonding pattern of the adenine base of ATP by establishing one hydrogen bond between the NH group of the maleimide moiety and the backbone carbonyl group of Glu121, whereas crystal structures of this class of organometallic complexes to other protein kinases typically reveal a second hydrogen bond to one of the carbonyl groups of the maleimide; this is prevented in PIM1 by the proline residue at position 123 [119]. Addi- tional water-mediated hydrogen bonds are formed between the hydroxyl group at the indole of (S)-DW12 and Lys67, Glu89 and Asp186. The organometallic inhibitor is tightly bound in the ATP binding site through a large number of hydrophobic contacts. Maybe most interestingly, although Staurosporine IC50 = 10 nM Pyridone IC50 = 50 nM Isoxazolo[3,4-b]quinolinedione Ki = 2.5 nM Bisindolylmaleimide IC50 = 10 nM [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazin Ki = 11 nM Benzo[4,5]thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidinone Ki = 5 nM Benzo[c]isoxazole Ki = 91 nM Thiazolidine-2,4-dione IC50 = 13 nM Benzo[c][2,6]naphthyridine IC50 = 5 nM Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazin (K00135) IC50 = 120 nM (S)-DW12 IC50 = 0.2 nMATP Pro123 Arg122 N O N H R N O O H N H N N N N O HO HO OPPP Glu121 H NN H N O O H O HN N H N O Ru O C O OH N NN H N O O S NH H2N N N HN CI NH N N N N N O N H N N N N N H CF3 N O N N NH2 CI S NH O O F S N NH Br O NMe2 HO HN O CN Br HO CI O O N H O N Figure 4. Selection of ATP-competitive PIM1 inhibitors. The reported IC50 or Ki values are shown. A. L. Merkel et al. 6 Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. this organometallic scaffold is a conventional ATP competi- tive binder, the unique shape of the complex permits novel interactions with the glycine-rich loop as illustrated in Figure 5. The residues Leu44, Gly45, Phe49 and Val52 together form a small hydrophobic pocket that appears perfectly suited for the CO ligand. In contrast to organic carbonyl functional groups, metal coordinated CO lacks any significant dipole moment and therefore behaves like a very hydrophobic ligand. It is worth noting that in this and related crystal structures the metal is not involved in any direct interaction and merely serves as a structural center. Therefore, it is not surprising that replacing ruthe- nium in (S)-DW12 against osmium leads to a compound with identical inhibition properties [120]. Metallo-pyridocar- bazole complexes currently represent the class of compounds with the highest affinity for PIM1 with IC50 values reaching down to 0.075 nM and demonstrating exquisite PIM1 selectivities [121,122]. The second class of ATP competitive inhibitors is distin- guished by the absence of any canonical hydrogen bonds with the hinge region. For example, Figure 6 displays the bind- ing of a benzo[c]isoxazole derivative to the active site of PIM1 [96]. No classical hydrogen bond is observed with the hinge region but a pyrimidine moiety forms a hydrogen bond with Lys67 which is located at the opposite site of the pocket (Figure 6A). However, the authors discuss an unusual weak hydrogen bond between an aromatic CH and the back- bone carbonyl group of Glu121. The binding of the imidazo [1,2-b]pyridazine inhibitor K00135, a compound that served as a lead structure for the development ofSGI-1776, is shown in Figure 6B and also exploits a hydrogen bond with Lys67 [107]. K00135 was demonstrated to be surprisingly selective for PIM1 over more than 50 diverse serine/ threonine kinase catalytic domains and the authors speculated that this is due to the combination out of the unusual PIM1 active site architecture, together with the unconven- tional binding mode. Interestingly, PIM2 was inhibited sig- nificantly weaker by a factor of around 100-fold although the amino acid residues of PIM1 and PIM2 are almost iden- tical so that this might be the result of a dynamic effect. Over- all, it appears to be a trend of many PIM inhibitors that selectivity for PIM1 and PIM3 is observed over PIM2. This selectivity might be the result of differences in the dynamic properties of the individual PIM isoforms [52]. 5. Expert opinion Effective and well-tolerable agents are still an unmet medical need in today’s cancer therapy. Despite the introduction of so-called targeted therapies, the overall survival of cancer patients is still disappointing. Commonly, these targeted therapies use tyrosine kinase inhibitors that show a high level Asp186 Val52 Phe49 Gly45 Leu44 H2O H2O C. B.A. Glu89 Glu121 Arg122 Pro123 Lys67 Figure 5. Structure of organoruthenium half-sandwich complex (S)-DW12 bound to the ATP-binding site of PIM1 in an ATP- mimetic fashion (pdb code 2BZI). A. Overall cartoon representation including van der Waals surface. B. Hydrogen bonding interactions of (S)-DW12 with the hinge region and water-mediated interactions to Glu89 and Asp186. C. Interactions with the glycine-rich loop. PIM1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] 7 E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. of side effects and rapidly lead into resistance as tyrosine kinase pathways are highly redundant in tumor cells. PIM1 represents a constitutively active serine/threonine kinase which is distinct from other classes of kinases by both its molecular structure and its molecular regulation. PIM1 controls oncogenic signaling pathways like hypoxia, cell cycle control or apoptosis resistance and has been shown to be overexpressed in various human cancers and to be associated with metastasis and overall prognosis. Therefore, PIM1 is an interesting novel target for targeted drug therapy. PIM1 inhibition by small molecules has been accomplished with a variety of chemical scaffolds through the development of ATP competitive binders, either by mimicking closely the hinge-binding of ATP or by exploiting other areas of the active site. Selected compounds have demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models and are currently undergoing early- phase clinical trials. However, the class of organometallic PIM1 inhibitors displays a significantly higher specificity and binding affinity down to picomolar Ki values compared to purely organic inhibitors. This can be traced back to a perfect shape complementarity provided by the structural metal center combined with the ability to undergo unique interactions with the flexible glycine-rich loop of PIM1. It is, of course, still necessary to better characterize the effect of these organometallic inhibitors on the molecular level in vitro. Here, the numerous interactions and signaling path- ways influenced by PIM1 open further possibilities for combi- nation approaches with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or direct pro-apoptotic stimulators to further increase the cytotoxic effects at probably even lower concentrations. Yet, the high number of available compounds demands further pharmaco- kinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in animal models that are at present still missing for most of these highly potent inhibitors. Based on their chemical properties, excellent in vivo applicability is expected and we therefore believe that clinical trials in human patients can be conducted in the near future. Acknowledgements We apologize to all colleagues whose work could not be cited due to space limitations. Declaration of interest The authors state no conflict of interest and have received no payment in preparation of this manuscript. Lys67 Lys67 Hinge Hinge A. B. Figure 6. Structures of non-hinge binding inhibitors bound to the ATP-binding site of PIM1. A. A benzo[c]isoxazole (pdb code 3BGP). B. Imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine K00135 (pdb code 2C3I). Highlighted are the hydrogen bonds to Lys67. A. L. Merkel et al. 8 Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. Bibliography Papers of special note have been highlighted as either of interest (�) or of considerable interest (��) to readers. 1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893-917 2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300 3. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000;100:57-70 4. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74 5. Stegmeier F, Warmuth M, Sellers WR, Dorsch M. Targeted cancer therapies in the twenty-first century: lessons from imatinib. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010;87:543-52 6. Steeghs N, Nortier JW, Gelderblom H. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumors: an update of recent developments. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:942-53 7. Fabian MA, Biggs WH III, Treiber DK, et al. A small molecule-kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors. Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:329-36 8. Mabuchi S, Hisamatsu T, Kimura T. Targeting mTOR signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. Curr Med Chem 2011;18:2960-8 9. Sparks CA, Guertin DA. Targeting mTOR: prospects for mTOR complex 2 inhibitors in cancer therapy. Oncogene 2010;29:3733-44 10. Workman P, Clarke PA, Raynaud FI, van Montfort RL. Drugging the PI3 kinome: from chemical tools to drugs in the clinic. Cancer Res 2010;70:2146-57 11. Strebhardt K. Multifaceted polo-like kinases: drug targets and antitargets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010;9:643-60 12. McInnes C, Wyatt MD. PLK1 as an oncology target: current status and future potential. Drug Discov Today 2011;16:619-25 13. Lens SM, Voest EE, Medema RH. Shared and separate functions of polo-like kinases and aurora kinases in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2010;10:825-41 14. Katayama H, Sen S. Aurora kinase inhibitors as anticancer molecules. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010;1799:829-39 15. Dar AA, Goff LW, Majid S, et al. Aurora kinase inhibitors--rising stars in cancer therapeutics? Mol Cancer Ther 2010;9:268-78 16. Plentz RR, Manns MP, Greten TF. Molecular therapy of pancreatic cancer. Minerva Endocrinol 2010;35:27-33 17. Reddy D, Wainberg ZA. Targeted therapies for metastatic esophagogastric cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2011;12:46-60 18. Greten TF, Korangy F, Manns MP, Malek NP. Molecular therapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2009;100:19-23 19. Jakobsen JN, Sorensen JB. Review on clinical trials of targeted treatments in malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2011;68:1-15 20. Sherman SI. Targeted therapies for thyroid tumors. Mod Pathol 2011;24(Suppl 2):S44-52 21. Shah N, Pang B, Yeoh KG, et al. Potential roles for the PIM1 kinase in human cancer - a molecular and therapeutic appraisal. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:2144-51 22. Nawijn MC, Alendar A, Berns A. For better or for worse: the role of pim oncogenes in tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:23-34 23. Cuypers HT, Selten G, Quint W, et al. Murine leukemia virus-induced T-cell lymphomagenesis: integration of proviruses in a distinct chromosomal region. Cell 1984;37:141-5024. Hoover D, Friedmann M, Reeves R, Magnuson NS. Recombinant human pim-1 protein exhibits serine/threonine kinase activity. J Biol Chem 1991;266:14018-23 25. Saris CJ, Domen J, Berns A. The pim-1 oncogene encodes two related protein-serine/threonine kinases by alternative initiation at AUG and CUG. EMBO J 1991;10:655-64 26. Wang Z, Bhattacharya N, Weaver M, et al. Pim-1: a serine/threonine kinase with a role in cell survival, proliferation, differentiation and tumorigenesis. J Vet Sci 2001;2:167-79 27. Miura O, Miura Y, Nakamura N, et al. Induction of tyrosine phosphorylation of vav and expression of pim-1 correlates with Jak2-mediated growth signaling from the erythropoietin receptor. Blood 1994;84:4135-41 28. Zhu N, Ramirez LM, Lee RL, et al. CD40 signaling in B cells regulates the expression of the Pim-1 kinase via the NF-kappa B pathway. J Immunol 2002;168:744-54 29. Magistroni V, Mologni L, Sanselicio S, et al. ERG deregulation induces PIM1 over-expression and aneuploidy in prostate epithelial cells. PLoS One 2011;6:e28162 30. Nasser MW, Datta J, Nuovo G, et al. Down-regulation of micro-RNA-1 (miR- 1) in lung cancer. Suppression of tumorigenic property of lung cancer cells and their sensitization to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis by miR-1. J Biol Chem 2008;283:33394-405 31. Thomas M, Lange-Grunweller K, Weirauch U, et al. The proto-oncogene pim-1 is a target of miR-33a. Oncogene 2012;31:918-28 32. Eiring AM, Harb JG, Neviani P, et al. miR-328 functions as an RNA decoy to modulate hnRNP E2 regulation of mRNA translation in leukemic blasts. Cell 2010;140:652-65 33. Qian KC, Wang L, Hickey ER, et al. Structural basis of constitutive activity and a unique nucleotide binding mode of human pim-1 kinase. J Biol Chem 2005;280:6130-7 .. This paper describes the unique structure of the kinase domain of PIM1, which renders PIM1 in a constitutively active conformation. 34. Liang H, Hittelman W, Nagarajan L. Ubiquitous expression and cell cycle regulation of the protein kinase PIM-1. Arch Biochem Biophys 1996;330:259-65 35. Bullock AN, Debreczeni J, Amos AL, et al. Structure and substrate specificity of the pim-1 kinase. J Biol Chem 2005;280:41675-82 36. Kim O, Jiang T, Xie Y, et al. Synergism of cytoplasmic kinases in IL6-induced ligand-independent activation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 2004;23:1838-44 37. Shay KP, Wang Z, Xing PX, et al. Pim-1 kinase stability is regulated by PIM1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] 9 E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. heat shock proteins and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol Cancer Res 2005;3:170-81 .. This paper describes how PIM1 is stabilized by the binding of Hsp90, but not by the binding of Hsp70 and that it remains active even after the binding of these proteins. 38. Losman JA, Chen XP, Vuong BQ, et al. Protein phosphatase 2A regulates the stability of pim protein kinases. J Biol Chem 2003;278:4800-5 39. Mochizuki T, Kitanaka C, Noguchi K, et al. Physical and functional interactions between pim-1 kinase and Cdc25A phosphatase. Implications for the pim-1-mediated activation of the c-Myc signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 1999;274:18659-66 40. Bachmann M, Kosan C, Xing PX, et al. The oncogenic serine/threonine kinase pim-1 directly phosphorylates and activates the G2/M specific phosphatase Cdc25C. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2006;38:430-43 41. Bachmann M, Hennemann H, Xing PX, et al. The oncogenic serine/threonine kinase pim-1 phosphorylates and inhibits the activity of Cdc25C-associated kinase 1 (C-TAK1): a novel role for Pim-1 at the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint. J Biol Chem 2004;279:48319-28 42. Wang Z, Bhattacharya N, Mixter PF, et al. Phosphorylation of the cell cycle inhibitor p21Cip1/WAF1 by pim-1 kinase. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1593:45-55 43. Morishita D, Katayama R, Sekimizu K, et al. Pim kinases promote cell cycle progression by phosphorylating and down-regulating p27Kip1 at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. Cancer Res 2008;68:5076-85 44. Cen B, Mahajan S, Zemskova M, et al. Regulation of Skp2 levels by the pim-1 protein kinase. J Biol Chem 2010;285:29128-37 45. Schuppan D, Ocker M. Integrin-mediated control of cell growth. Hepatology 2003;38:289-91 46. Bhattacharya N, Wang Z, Davitt C, et al. Pim-1 associates with protein complexes necessary for mitosis. Chromosoma 2002;111:80-95 47. Aho TL, Sandholm J, Peltola KJ, et al. Pim-1 kinase promotes inactivation of the pro-apoptotic Bad protein by phosphorylating it on the Ser112 gatekeeper site. FEBS Lett 2004;571:43-9 .. This paper shows that the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21cip1/waf1 can be phosphorylated by PIM1 which influences its subcellular localization and promotes cell cycle progression. 48. Gu JJ, Wang Z, Reeves R, Magnuson NS. PIM1 phosphorylates and negatively regulates ASK1-mediated apoptosis. Oncogene 2009;28:4261-71 49. Zhang F, Beharry ZM, Harris TE, et al. PIM1 protein kinase regulates PRAS40 phosphorylation and mTOR activity in FDCP1 cells. Cancer Biol Ther 2009;8:846-53 50. Jung CH, Ro SH, Cao J, et al. mTOR regulation of autophagy. FEBS Lett 2010;584:1287-95 51. Chen J, Kobayashi M, Darmanin S, et al. Hypoxia-mediated up-regulation of pim-1 contributes to solid tumor formation. Am J Pathol 2009;175:400-11 52. Brault L, Gasser C, Bracher F, et al. PIM serine/threonine kinases in the pathogenesis and therapy of hematologic malignancies and solid cancers. Haematologica 2010;95:1004-15 53. Zippo A, De Robertis A, Serafini R, Oliviero S. PIM1-dependent phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 is required for MYC-dependent transcriptional activation and oncogenic transformation. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9:932-44 .. This paper demonstrates that PIM1 activity contributes to MYC-dependent transformating capacity. 54. Hogan C, Hutchison C, Marcar L, et al. Elevated levels of oncogenic protein kinase pim-1 induce the p53 pathway in cultured cells and correlate with increased Mdm2 in mantle cell lymphoma. J Biol Chem 2008;283:18012-23 55. Zemskova M, Lilly MB, Lin YW, et al. p53-dependent induction of prostate cancer cell senescence by the PIM1 protein kinase. Mol Cancer Res 2010;8:1126-41 56. Xie Y, Xu K, Linn DE, et al. The 44-kDa pim-1 kinase phosphorylates BCRP/ABCG2 and thereby promotes its multimerization and drug-resistant activity in human prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2008;283:3349-56 . This paper shows a mechanism how PIM1 is able to regulate chemoresistance. 57. Chen J, Kobayashi M, Darmanin S, et al. Pim-1 plays a pivotal role in hypoxia-induced chemoresistance. Oncogene 2009;28:2581-92 58. Grundler R, Brault L, Gasser C, et al. Dissection of PIM serine/threonine kinases in FLT3-ITD-induced leukemogenesis reveals PIM1 as regulator of CXCL12-CXCR4-mediated homing and migration. J Exp Med 2009;206:1957-70 59. van Lohuizen M, Verbeek S, Krimpenfort P, et al. Predisposition to lymphomagenesis in pim-1 transgenic mice: cooperation with c-myc and N-myc in murine leukemia virus-induced tumors. Cell 1989;56:673-82 60. Verbeek S, van Lohuizen M, van der Valk M, et al. Mice bearing the E mu-myc and E mu-pim-1 transgenes develop pre-B-cell leukemia prenatally. Mol Cell Biol 1991;11:1176-9 61. Schenone S, Tintori C, Botta M. Using insights into pim1 structure to design new anticancer drugs. Curr Pharm Des 2010;16:3964-78 62. Amson R, Sigaux F, Przedborski S, et al. The human protooncogene product p33pim is expressed during fetal hematopoiesis and in diverse leukemias. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:8857-61 63. Hsi ED, Jung SH, Lai R, et al. Ki67 and PIM1 expression predict outcome in mantle cell lymphoma treated with high dosetherapy, stem cell transplantation and rituximab: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B 59909 correlative science study. Leuk Lymphoma 2008;49:2081-90 64. Mahadevan D, Spier C, Della Croce K, et al. Transcript profiling in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies distinct tumor profile signatures. Mol Cancer Ther 2005;4:1867-79 65. Guo S, Mao X, Chen J, et al. Overexpression of pim-1 in bladder cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010;29:161 A. L. Merkel et al. 10 Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. 66. Dhanasekaran SM, Barrette TR, Ghosh D, et al. Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature 2001;412:822-6 . This is the first paper describing dysregulated expression of PIM1 in epithelial tumors. 67. Valdman A, Fang X, Pang ST, et al. Pim-1 expression in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and human prostate cancer. Prostate 2004;60:367-71 68. Cibull TL, Jones TD, Li L, et al. Overexpression of pim-1 during progression of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:285-8 69. Xu Y, Zhang T, Tang H, et al. Overexpression of PIM-1 is a potential biomarker in prostate carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2005;92:326-30 70. He HC, Bi XC, Zheng ZW, et al. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR assessment of PIM-1 and hK2 mRNA expression in benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Med Oncol 2009;26:303-8 71. Liu HT, Wang N, Wang X, Li SL. Overexpression of pim-1 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2010;102:683-8 72. Yan B, Yau EX, Samanta S, et al. Clinical and therapeutic relevance of PIM1 kinase in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2011 (Epub ahead of print) 73. Warnecke-Eberz U, Bollschweiler E, Drebber U, et al. Prognostic impact of protein overexpression of the proto-oncogene PIM-1 in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2009;29:4451-5 74. Sepulveda AR, Tao H, Carloni E, et al. Screening of gene expression profiles in gastric epithelial cells induced by Helicobacter pylori using microarray analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16(Suppl 2):145-57 75. Chang YT, Wu MS, Chang YJ, et al. Distinct gene expression profiles in gastric epithelial cells induced by different clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori--implication of bacteria and host interaction in gastric carcinogenesis. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:484-90 76. Beier UH, Weise JB, Laudien M, et al. Overexpression of pim-1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Oncol 2007;30:1381-7 77. Choi JY, Cho SI, Do NY, et al. Clinical significance of the expression of galectin-3 and pim-1 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;39:28-34 78. Peltola K, Hollmen M, Maula SM, et al. Pim-1 kinase expression predicts radiation response in squamocellular carcinoma of head and neck and is under the control of epidermal growth factor receptor. Neoplasia 2009;11:629-36 79. Babel I, Barderas R, Diaz-Uriarte R, et al. Identification of tumor-associated autoantigens for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in serum using high density protein microarrays. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009;8:2382-95 80. Warnecke-Eberz U, Bollschweiler E, Drebber U, et al. Frequent down-regulation of pim-1 mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with lymph node metastases. Oncol Rep 2008;20:619-24 81. Reiser-Erkan C, Erkan M, Pan Z, et al. Hypoxia-inducible proto-oncogene pim- 1 is a prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther 2008;7:1352-9 82. Qian J, Niu J, Li M, et al. In vitro modeling of human pancreatic duct epithelial cell transformation defines gene expression changes induced by K-ras oncogenic activation in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2005;65:5045-53 83. Xu D, Allsop SA, Witherspoon SM, et al. The oncogenic kinase Pim-1 is modulated by K-Ras signaling and mediates transformed growth and radioresistance in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis 2011;32:488-95 84. Zemskova M, Sahakian E, Bashkirova S, Lilly M. The PIM1 kinase is a critical component of a survival pathway activated by docetaxel and promotes survival of docetaxel-treated prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2008;283:20635-44 85. Kim W, Youn H, Seong KM, et al. PIM1-activated PRAS40 regulates radioresistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells through interplay with FOXO3a, 14-3-3 and protein phosphatases. Radiat Res 2011;176:539-52 86. von Lindern M, van Agthoven T, Hagemeijer A, et al. The human pim-1 gene is not directly activated by the translocation (6;9) in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Oncogene 1989;4:75-9 87. Pasqualucci L, Neumeister P, Goossens T, et al. Hypermutation of multiple proto-oncogenes in B-cell diffuse large-cell lymphomas. Nature 2001;412:341-6 88. Deutsch AJ, Fruhwirth M, Aigelsreiter A, et al. Primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphomas are targeted by aberrant somatic hypermutation. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:476-9 89. Kumar A, Mandiyan V, Suzuki Y, et al. Crystal structures of proto-oncogene kinase Pim1: a target of aberrant somatic hypermutations in diffuse large cell lymphoma. J Mol Biol 2005;348:183-93 90. Jacobs MD, Black J, Futer O, et al. Pim-1 ligand-bound structures reveal the mechanism of serine/threonine kinase inhibition by LY294002. J Biol Chem 2005;280:13728-34 91. Bullock AN, Debreczeni JE, Fedorov OY, et al. Structural basis of inhibitor specificity of the human protooncogene proviral insertion site in moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM-1) kinase. J Med Chem 2005;48:7604-14 92. Debreczeni JE, Bullock AN, Atilla GE, et al. Ruthenium half-sandwich complexes bound to protein kinase Pim-1. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2006;45:1580-5 . First reported structure of an organometallic compound bound to the ATP binding site of a protein kinase. 93. Bullock AN, Russo S, Amos A, et al. Crystal structure of the PIM2 kinase in complex with an organoruthenium inhibitor. PLoS One 2009;4:e7112 94. Cheney IW, Yan S, Appleby T, et al. Identification and structure-activity relationships of substituted pyridones as inhibitors of Pim-1 kinase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007;17:1679-83 95. Tong Y, Stewart KD, Thomas S, et al. Isoxazolo[3,4-b]quinoline-3,4(1H,9H)- diones as unique, potent and selective inhibitors for Pim-1 and Pim-2 kinases: chemistry, biological activities, and molecular modeling. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2008;18:5206-8 PIM1 kinase as a target for cancer therapy Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] 11 E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y. 96. Pierce AC, Jacobs M, Stuver-Moody C. Docking study yields four novel inhibitors of the protooncogene Pim-1 kinase. J Med Chem 2008;51:1972-5 97. Grey R, Pierce AC, Bemis GW, et al. Structure-based design of 3-aryl-6-amino- triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine inhibitors of pim-1 kinase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2009;19:3019-22 98. Xia Z, Knaak C, Ma J, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of novel inhibitors of pim-1 and pim-2 protein kinases. J Med Chem 2009;52:74-86 99. Tao ZF, Hasvold LA, Leverson JD, et al. Discovery of 3H-benzo[4,5]thieno[3,2-d] pyrimidin-4-ones as potent, highly selective, and orally bioavailable inhibitors of the human protooncogene proviral insertion site in moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM) kinases. J Med Chem 2009;52:6621-36 100. Akue-Gedu R, Rossignol E, Azzaro S, et al. Synthesis, kinase inhibitory potencies, and in vitro antiproliferative evaluation of new Pim kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 2009;52:6369-81 101. Sliman F, Blairvacq M, Durieu E, etal. Identification and structure-activity relationship of 8-hydroxy-quinoline-7- carboxylic acid derivatives as inhibitors of pim-1 kinase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2010;20:2801-5 102. Lopez-Ramos M, Prudent R, Moucadel V, et al. New potent dual inhibitors of CK2 and pim kinases: discovery and structural insights. FASEB J 2010;24:3171-85 103. Miduturu CV, Deng X, Kwiatkowski N, et al. High-throughput kinase profiling: a more efficient approach toward the discovery of new kinase inhibitors. Chem Biol 2011;18:868-79 104. Pierre F, Stefan E, Nedellec AS, et al. 7- (4H-1,2,4-Triazol-3-yl)benzo[c][2,6] naphthyridines: a novel class of pim kinase inhibitors with potent cell antiproliferative activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2011;21:6687-92 105. Xiang Y, Hirth B, Asmussen G, et al. The discovery of novel benzofuran-2-carboxylic acids as potent Pim-1 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2011;21:3050-6 106. Ren JX, Li LL, Zheng RL, et al. Discovery of novel pim-1 kinase inhibitors by a hierarchical multistage virtual screening approach based on SVM model, pharmacophore, and molecular docking. J Chem Inf Model 2011;51:1364-75 107. Pogacic V, Bullock AN, Fedorov O, et al. Structural analysis identifies imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazines as PIM kinase inhibitors with in vitro antileukemic activity. Cancer Res 2007;67:6916-24 .. Early example of the identification and biological evaluation of a non-hinge binding PIM1 inhibitor. 108. Holder S, Zemskova M, Zhang C, et al. Characterization of a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the PIM1 kinase. Mol Cancer Ther 2007;6:163-72 109. Amaravadi R, Thompson CB. The survival kinases Akt and Pim as potential pharmacological targets. J Clin Invest 2005;115:2618-24 110. Blanco-Aparicio C, Collazo AM, Oyarzabal J, et al. Pim 1 kinase inhibitor ETP-45299 suppresses cellular proliferation and synergizes with PI3K inhibition. Cancer Lett 2011;300:145-53 111. Chen LS, Redkar S, Bearss D, et al. Pim kinase inhibitor, SGI-1776, induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood 2009;114:4150-7 112. Chen LS, Redkar S, Taverna P, et al. Mechanisms of cytotoxicity to Pim kinase inhibitor, SGI-1776, in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2011;118:693-702 113. Santio NM, Vahakoski RL, Rainio EM, et al. Pim-selective inhibitor DHPCC-9 reveals pim kinases as potent stimulators of cancer cell migration and invasion. Mol Cancer 2010;9:279 114. Magnuson NS, Wang Z, Ding G, Reeves R. Why target PIM1 for cancer diagnosis and treatment? Future Oncol 2010;6:1461-78 115. Hu XF, Li J, Vandervalk S, et al. PIM-1-specific mAb suppresses human and mouse tumor growth by decreasing PIM-1 levels, reducing Akt phosphorylation, and activating apoptosis. J Clin Invest 2009;119:362-75 116. Batra V, Maris JM, Kang MH, et al. Initial testing (stage 1) of SGI-1776, a PIM1 kinase inhibitor, by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011 (Epub ahead of print) 117. Mumenthaler SM, Ng PY, Hodge A, et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of Pim kinases alters prostate cancer cell growth and resensitizes chemoresistant cells to taxanes. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:2882-93 118. Mahalingam D, Espitia CM, Medina EC, et al. Targeting PIM kinase enhances the activity of sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2011;105:1563-73 119. Atilla-Gokcumen GE, Pagano N, Streu C, et al. Extremely tight binding of a ruthenium complex to glycogen synthase kinase 3. ChemBioChem 2008;9:2933-6 120. Maksimoska J, Williams DS, Atilla-Gokcumen GE, et al. Similar biological activities of two isostructural ruthenium and osmium complexes. Chem Eur J 2008;14:4816-22 121. Bregman H, Meggers E. Ruthenium half-sandwich complexes as protein kinase inhibitors: an N-succinimidyl ester for rapid derivatizations of the cyclopentadienyl moiety. Org Lett 2006;8:5465-8 122. Feng L, Geisselbrecht Y, Blanck S, et al. Structurally sophisticated octahedral metal complexes as highly selective protein kinase inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133:5976-86 . This paper describes a selection of very selective metal-based protein kinase inhibitors including a picomolar inhibitor for PIM1. Affiliation Anna Lena Merkel1, Eric Meggers2 & Matthias Ocker†1 †Author for correspondence 1Philipps University Marburg, Institute for Surgical Research, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35033, Germany E-mail: Matthias.Ocker@staff.uni-marburg.de 2Department of Chemistry, Philipps University Marburg, Institute for Surgical Research, Baldingerstrasse, Marburg, 35033, Germany A. L. Merkel et al. 12 Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs [Early Online] E xp er t O pi n. I nv es tig . D ru gs D ow nl oa de d fr om in fo rm ah ea lth ca re .c om b y U B M ar bu rg o n 03 /0 5/ 12 Fo r pe rs on al u se o nl y.
Compartilhar