Buscar

Green Coffee Bean Extract Animal Study 2

Faça como milhares de estudantes: teste grátis o Passei Direto

Esse e outros conteúdos desbloqueados

16 milhões de materiais de várias disciplinas

Impressão de materiais

Agora você pode testar o

Passei Direto grátis

Você também pode ser Premium ajudando estudantes

Faça como milhares de estudantes: teste grátis o Passei Direto

Esse e outros conteúdos desbloqueados

16 milhões de materiais de várias disciplinas

Impressão de materiais

Agora você pode testar o

Passei Direto grátis

Você também pode ser Premium ajudando estudantes

Faça como milhares de estudantes: teste grátis o Passei Direto

Esse e outros conteúdos desbloqueados

16 milhões de materiais de várias disciplinas

Impressão de materiais

Agora você pode testar o

Passei Direto grátis

Você também pode ser Premium ajudando estudantes
Você viu 3, do total de 3 páginas

Prévia do material em texto

Inhibitory Activity of Chlorogenic Acids in Decaffeinated Green Coffee Beans
against Porcine Pancreas Lipase and Effect of a Decaffeinated Green
Coffee Bean Extract on an Emulsion of Olive Oil
Yusaku NARITA,y Kazuya IWAI, Taiji FUKUNAGA, and Osamu NAKAGIRI
R&D Center, UCC Ueshima Coffee Co., Ltd., 3-1-4 Zushi, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-0036, Japan
Received July 4, 2012; Accepted August 26, 2012; Online Publication, December 7, 2012
[doi:10.1271/bbb.120518]
A decaffeinated green coffee bean extract (DGCBE)
inhibited porcine pancreas lipase (PPL) activity with an
IC50 value of 1.98mg/mL. Six different chlorogenic
acids in DGCBE contributed to this PPL inhibition,
accounting for 91.8% of the inhibitory activity. DGCBE
increased the droplet size and decreased the specific
surface area of an olive oil emulsion.
Key words: coffee; decaffeinated green coffee bean
extract; chlorogenic acid; emulsion; lipase
inhibitor
Coffee is one of the most popular beverages in the
world and is a major source of polyphenols, particularly
chlorogenic acids (CGAs). CGAs in green coffee beans
consist of three main classes: caffeoylquinic acids
(CQAs) with three isomers (3-, 4-, and 5-CQA),
dicaffeoylquinic acids (diCQAs) with three isomers
(3,4-, 3,5-, and 4,5-diCQA), and feruloylquinic acids
(FQAs) with three isomers (3-, 4-, and 5-FQA).1) Green
coffee beans are rich in CGAs, their contents being 3.5–
7.5% (w/w of dry matter) for Coffea arabica and 7.0–
14.0% (w/w of dry matter) for Coffea canephora.2)
These nine CGAs account for 80% of the total CGAs in
green coffee beans.
Porcine pancreas lipase (EC 3.1.1.3, hereafter abbre-
viated as PPL) is a water-soluble enzyme that catalyzes
the hydrolysis of the ester bonds of triacylglycerols to
form monoacylglycerol and two fatty acids at the
interface between an insoluble substrate and water.
PPL is composed of a single polypeptide chain of 449
amino acid residues (50 kDa) connected to a glycan
chain (2 kDa) and has 86% homology with human
pancreas lipase.3,4) Pancreas lipase is a key enzyme for
fat digestion in the intestines.
Lipase inhibitors appear to be effective for preventing
obesity and for its therapy by controlling the absorption
of fat in the diet, as this fat is an energy source with a
high caloric content. Lipase inhibitors are also used to
prevent such undesirable changes in foods as offensive
flavors caused by lipases.
We investigated the inhibitory effects of a decaffei-
nated green coffee bean extract (DGCBE) on PPL
activity. DGCBE was obtained from Ominedo Pharma-
ceutical Industries (Nara, Japan). The activity of PPL in
the absence and presence of DGCBE was determined
according to a previously reported method5) with some
modifications. A total of 80mg of triolein, 10mg of
lecithin, and 5mg of sodium taurochoric acid were
added to 9mL of a 0.1 M 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-
piperazinyl] ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer
(pH 7.0). An emulsion was prepared by ultrasonicating
this mixture. DGCBE samples (40 mL) of different
concentrations or 40 mL of the 0.1 M HEPES buffer
(control) were mixed with 40 mL of the emulsion and
incubated at 37 �C for 30min. A 20-mL amount of PPL
(15,000U/mL) was added to the mixture which was
then incubated at 37 �C for 30min. The reaction was
terminated by boiling for 3min. Free fatty acids in the
mixture were determined by using a NEFA C-test kit for
free fatty acids (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan).
The IC50 value was determined from a least-squares
regression line after plotting the natural logarithms of
the sample concentrations against the remaining PPL
activity. The inhibitory effects of DGCBE increased
with increasing inhibitor concentration, with an IC50
value of 1.98mg/mL (Table 1).
Green coffee beans are rich in CGAs that have such
biological effects as antioxidative activity, matrix metal-
loproteinase inhibition, tyrosinase inhibitory activity,
and �-amylase inhibitory activity.1,6–8) We evaluated the
inhibitory effects against PPL of 3-CQA, 4-CQA, 3-
FQA, 4-FQA, 5-FQA, 3,4-diCQA, 3,5-diCQA, and 4,5-
diCQA, each of which was purified from DGCBE as
described in our previous paper,1) and of 5-CQA which
was purchased (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). The
inhibitory effects of these nine different CGAs against
PPL increased with increasing CGA concentration
(Fig. 1); their IC50 values are shown in Table 1. The
inhibitory activities of such caffeic acid derivatives as
CQAs and diCQAs were higher than those of such
ferulic acid derivatives as FQAs, suggesting that the two
neighboring hydroxyls on the catechol ring were
effective for this inhibitory activity.
The contents of eight of the CGAs in DGCBE have
been previously reported.9) The contents of 3-CQA, 4-
CQA, 5-CQA, 4-FQA, 5-FQA, 3,4-diCQA, 3,5-diCQA,
and 4,5-diCQA in DGCBE were 5.12, 7.03, 14.8, 1.29,
3.84, 2.10, 1.59, and 3.04 g/100 g.9) The relative
contributions of six of these CGAs to the IC50 value
y To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +81-72-674-4576; E-mail: yuusaku-narita@ucc.co.jp
Abbreviations: CQA, caffeoylquinic acid; FQA, feruloylquinic acid; diCQA, dicaffeoylquinic acid; DGCBE, decaffeinated green coffee bean
extract
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 76 (12), 2329–2331, 2012
Note
of DGCBE were calculated as follows:9,10) Relative
contribution (%) ¼ IC50;DGCBE �CCGA/IC50;CGA where
IC50;DGCBE is the IC50 value of DGCBE, CCGA is the
amount (%) of each chlorogenic acid in DGCBE, and
IC50;CGA is the IC50 value of each chlorogenic acid. The
theoretical relative contributions to PPL inhibition by
3-CQA, 4-CQA, 5-CQA, 3,4-diCQA, 3,5-diCQA, and
4,5-diCQA against DGCBE were respectively calculated
as 9.3%, 11.1%, 26.2%, 13.0%, 8.1%, and 24.1%
(Table 1). The total relative contribution of these six
CGAs to the inhibitory activity of DGCBE was 91.8%
(Table 1). These six CGAs were thus major contributors
to the inhibition of PPL activity by DGCBE. In
particular, 5-CQA and 4,5-diCQA mainly contributed
to the inhibitory activity of DGCBE against PPL
(Table 1).
PPL inhibition is mainly classified into two
types.11–13) One type of inhibition is due to direct
interaction between the inhibitor and enzyme, and the
other is due to the inhibitor affecting the properties of
the fat emulsion such as the droplet size and specific
surface area, because the lipase activity is sensitive to
the size and specific surface area of the fat emul-
sion.14–17) It has been reported that a green tea extract
and catechins had effects on the physicochemical
properties of an olive oil emulsion by increasing its
droplet size and decreasing its specific surface area.14)
We evaluated the effects of DGCBE on the droplet size
and the specific surface area of an olive oil emulsion by
using a previously reported method.14) An olive oil
emulsion was prepared by mixing taurocholic acid
(8.0mM final concentration), olive oil (1% v/v), phos-
phatidylcholine (2.3mM), NaCl (150mM), and CaCl2
(10mM) in a 2mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.5). A sample
(3 mL) was added to 20mL of this mixture, and the pH
value was readjusted to 7.5 with NaHCO3. The mixture
was incubated at 37 �C while constantly shaking
(100 stokes/min) for 3 h. The droplet size and specific
surface area of the olive oil emulsion were each
measured by an LA-920 laser scattering particle size
distribution analyzer (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). We used
distilled water as a negative control, and a catechin
mixture from green tea (Wako) as a positive control.
Compared with the negative control emulsion, the
droplet size increased and the specific surface area
decreased for the emulsion with the catechin mixture
(Table 2). This result was in agreement with a previous
report.14) The droplet size and specific surface area of
the emulsion with DGCBE also respectively increased
and decreased (Table 2). This phenomenon indicates
that at least one of the inhibitory mechanisms of
DGCBE was reducing the surface area of the lipidemulsion because the lipase activity is governed by the
area of the oil-water interface.14–17)
It has been reported that a competitive inhibition
model accounted for the inhibitory effects of both
chlorogenic acid (5-CQA) and caffeic acid against the
rice bran lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis of triacetin which
is a water-soluble substrate.18) Their respective inhib-
ition constants (Ki) were 1.8 mM and 1.5 mM.18) The PPL
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
Concentration (mM) 
R
el
at
iv
e 
ac
tiv
ity
 (%
)
0 2 4 6 8 
A 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
100 
Concentration (mM) 
R
el
at
iv
e 
ac
tiv
ity
 (%
)
0 2 4 6 8 
B 
Fig. 1. Inhibitory Effects of Nine Different Chlorogenic Acids against the PPL-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Triolein in an Emulsion.
The inhibition assay was performed at pH 7.0 and 37 �C. A: 5-CQA (unfilled circles), 4-CQA (unfilled triangles), and 3-CQA (unfilled
squares). B: 5-FQA (filled circles), 4-FQA (filled triangles), 3-FQA (filled squares), 3,4-diCQA (unfilled diamonds), 3,5-diCQA (filled
diamonds), and 4,5-diCQA (inverted unfilled triangles). Each point represents the average of 5 measurements, and error bars indicate � SD.
Table 2. Droplet Size and Specific Surface Area of Olive Oil
Emulsions with and without a Sample
Sample
Conc. Droplet size Specific surface area
(mg/mL) (mm)a (m2/g oil)a
H2O — 5:2� 0:1 1:6� 0:0
DGCBE 1.0 14:9� 2:9 1:1� 0:1
DGCBE 5.0 17:2� 3:5 1:0� 0:1
Catechin mixture 1.0 123:0� 4:9 0:1� 0:0
aValues are the mean� SD (n ¼ 3).
Table 1. IC50 for DGCBE and Nine Kinds of CGAs and the
Contribution of Six Kinds of CGAs
Sample
IC50
a
Contribution
(mg/mL) (mM) (%)
DGCBE 1:98� 0:21 — —
3-CQA 1:09� 0:08 3:09� 0:25 9.3
4-CQA 1:25� 0:10 3:53� 0:26 11.1
5-CQA 1:12� 0:04 3:15� 0:12 26.2
3-FQA >2.95 >8.00 —
4-FQA >2.95 >8.00 —
5-FQA >2.95 >8.00 —
3,4-diCQA 0:32� 0:02 0:62� 0:04 13.0
3,5-diCQA 0:39� 0:04 0:75� 0:08 8.1
4,5-diCQA 0:25� 0:03 0:48� 0:07 24.1
aValues are the mean� SD (n ¼ 5).
2330 Y. NARITA et al.
inhibition model for DGCBE is quite complex and
requires further study. We are currently investigating the
PPL inhibitory mechanism of DGCBE. The inhibition
mechanisms of some inhibitors from foods have been
reported.12,13,19) It has been suggested that protein from
soy bean seeds inhibited PPL, and that the cause was not
by the direct interaction between PPL and the inhibitor,
but between the inhibitor and substrate emulsion.12,13)
Goncalves et al. have reported that procyanidins from
grape seeds inhibited PPL and that this inhibition was
caused by the interaction between the inhibitor and the
enzyme at a very high stoichiometric ratio before PPL
inhibition.19)
The IC50 value of 5-CQA for the PPL-catalyzed
hydrolysis of triolein was 3.15mM in this study.
Raghavendra et al. have reported that the Ki value of
5-CQA for the rice bran lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis of
triacetin was 1.8 mM.11) There seem to be two factors
concerning the differences in these results, one possibly
being due to the different substrates used for the
experiments. We used triolein as a water-insoluble
substrate, but Raghavendra et al. used triacetin as a
water-soluble substrate. Kobayashi et al. have reported
that the inhibitory effects of catechins and theaflavins
against the PPL-catalyzed hydrolysis of triolein, which
is a water-insoluble substrate in an emulsion, were much
weaker than those against the PPL-catalyzed hydrolysis
of 4-methylumbelliferone which is a water-soluble
substrate.5) The other factor concerning the differences
in these results is the kind of lipase used; we used PPL,
but Raghavendra et al. used rice bran lipase. It has been
reported that globulinous material from garden radish
seeds had markedly high inhibitory activity against
Rhizopus delemar lipase, but not much against PPL.11)
Further investigation is needed to elucidate the activities
of various lipases on different substrates in the presence
and absence of 5-CQA.
In conclusion, we have shown that DGCBE had an
inhibitory effect against the PPL catalysis of triolein in
an emulsion and that six CGAs contributed to this
inhibitory activity. At least one of the inhibitory
mechanisms of DGCBE was reducing the surface area
of a lipid emulsion. These observations provide signifi-
cant clues for the development of lipase inhibitors that
may be useful for preventing obesity and for its therapy.
References
1) Narita Y and Inouye K, Food Chem., 127, 1532–1539 (2011).
2) Ky CL, Louarn J, Dussert S, Guyot B, Hamon S, and Noriot M,
Food Chem., 75, 223–230 (2001).
3) De Caro J, Boudouard M, Bonicel A, Guidoni P, Desnuelle P,
and Rovery M, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 671, 129–138 (1981).
4) Winkler FK, D’Arcy A, and Hunziker W, Nature, 343, 771–774
(1990).
5) Kobayashi M, Ichitani M, Suzuki Y, Unno T, Sugawara T,
Yamahira T, Kato M, Takihara T, Sagesaka Y, Kakuda T, and
Ikeda I, J. Agric. Food Chem., 57, 7131–7136 (2009).
6) Narita Y and Inouye K, J. Agric. Food Chem., 57, 9218–9225
(2009).
7) Iwai K, Kishimoto N, Kakino Y, Mochida K, and Fujita T,
J. Agric. Food Chem., 52, 4893–4898 (2004).
8) Jin UH, Lee JY, Kang SK, Kim JK, Park WH, Kim JG, Moon
SK, and Kim CH, Life Sci., 77, 2760–2769 (2005).
9) Kamitani Y, Iwai K, Fukunaga T, Kimura R, and Nakagiri O,
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi (in Japanese), 56,
336–342 (2009).
10) Furusawa M, Narita Y, Iwai K, Fukunaga T, and Nakagiri O,
Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 75, 1205–1207 (2011).
11) Ishii C, Endo Y, Kimoto H, and Taniguchi K, Nippon Shokuhin
Kogaku Gakkaishi, 35, 430–439 (1988).
12) Satouchi K, Mori T, and Matsushita S, Agric. Biol. Chem., 38,
97–101 (1974).
13) Satouchi K and Matsushita S, Agric. Biol. Chem., 40, 889–897
(1976).
14) Shishikura Y, Khokhar S, and Murray BS, J. Agric. Food
Chem., 54, 1906–1913 (2006).
15) Benzonana G, Entressangles B, Marchis-Mouren G, Pasero L,
Sarda L, and Desnuelle P, ‘‘Metabolism and Physiological
Significance of Lipids,’’ John Wiely and Sons, New York,
pp. 141–154 (1964).
16) Armand M, Borel P, Ythier P, Dutot G, Melin C, Senft M,
Lafont H, and Lairon D, J. Nutr. Biochem., 3, 333–341 (1992).
17) Borel P, Armand M, Ythier P, Dutot G, Melin C, Senft M,
Lafont H, and Lairon D, J. Nutr. Biochem., 5, 124–133 (1994).
18) Raghavendra MP, Kumar PR, and Prakash V, J. Food Sci., 72,
E412–E419 (2007).
19) Goncalves R, Mateus N, and de Freitas V, J. Agric. Food
Chem., 58, 11901–11906 (2010).
Lipase Inhibition by a Decaffeinated Green Coffee Bean Extract 2331

Outros materiais