Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
S. RAJKUMAR 28.02.2012 Baldwin’s Rules • Prof. J. E. Baldwin – 1976 • Qualitative set of generalization on the probability of a ring closure (RC) • Empirical « rules » formulated from observations and stereoelectronic reasoning • Describe kinetic feasibility of ring closure • Physical basis lie in stereochemical • The rules do not apply to second row elements and to pericyclic reactions Terminology/Classification (1) • Prefix exo when the breaking bond is exocyclic to the smallest ring formed. • Prefix endo when the breaking bond is endocyclic to the smallest ring formed. Terminology/Classification (2) • Numerical prefix describe the size of formed ring. • Sufixes Tet, Trig and Dig indicate the geometry of the carbon undergoing the RC. • Tetrahedral for sp3 carbon • Trigonal for sp2 carbon • Digonal for sp carbon Rules for Ring Closure (1) • Tetrahedral Systems • 3 to 7-exo-Tet are all favoured processes • 5 to 6-endo-Tet are disfavoured Rules for Ring Closure (2) • Trigonal systems • 3 to 7-exo-Trig are all favoured processes • 3 to 5-endo-Trig are disfavoured; 6 to 7-endo-Trig are favoured Rules for Ring Closure (3) • Digonal Systems • 3 to 4-exo-Dig are disfavoured processes; 5 to 7-exo- Dig are favoured • 3 to 7-endo-Dig are favoured Other Than Nucleophilic Cases • Radical Processes (homolitic): • Cationic Processes: Attack Trajectories • Favoured paths to transition states are: Tetrahedral Systems Trigonal Systems Digonal Systems Favoured and Disfavoured • Favoured RC will be those in which length and nature of linking chain enables terminal atoms to achieve required trajectory to form final ring bond • Disfavoured RC would require severe bond angle and distances distortion, so the desired RC will be difficult (if available, alternative pathways will dominate) Tetrahedral carbon (1) • All exo-Tet cyclisations are favoured Trigonal Carbon (1) • All exo-Trig cyclisations are favoured Trigonal Carbon (2) • Example of disfavoured 5-endo-Trig Trigonal Carbon (3) • 5-endo-Trig versus 5-exo-Trig Trigonal Carbon (4) • 5-endo-Trig exceptions : Trigonal Carbon (5) • 5-endo-Trig versus 5-exo-Trig; Nitrogen analogue Trigonal Carbon (6) • 5-endo-Trig versus 5-exo-Trig; Nitrogen analogue (MO explanation) Digonal carbon • All endo-Dig cyclizations are favoured • 3- and 4-exo-Dig cyclisations are disfavoured Intramolecular Alkylations of Ketone Enolates (1) • Endocyclic alkylations • Exoclyclic alkylations • 6- to 7- membered RC Favoured • 3- to 5- membered RC Disfavoured • 3- to 7- membered RC Favoured Intramolecular Aldol Condensations (1) • Endocyclic reactions • Exoclyclic reactions • 3- to 7- membered RC Favoured • 3- to 5- membered RC Disfavoured • 6- to 7- membered RC Favoured Stereoelectronic Constraints O Y O Y C alkylations C alkylations 180° attack 109° attack Intramolecular alkylations of ketone enolates Intramolecular aldol condensations O alkylations O alkylations Intramolecular Alkylations of Ketone Enolates (1) • Why 5-(Enolendo)-exo-tet disfavoured? Intramolecular Alkylations of Ketone Enolates (2) • Why 6-(enolendo)-exo-tet favoured? Intramolecular Aldol Condensations (2) Statistics : 4 possibilities to form a 5 membered ring 2 possibilities to form a 6 membered ring Previsions : 6 membered ring would be predominant or exclusive 6-(enolendo)-exo-trig versus 5-(enolendo)-exo-trig Intramolecular Aldol Condensations (3) Formation of cyclohexanone totally dominates over even statistically preferred cyclopentanones production. Conclusion • Only give information about whether processes are favoured or disfavoured and not allowed and forbidden. • Nucleophilic RC feasibility strongly depends on ring size, geometry of reacting atom and exo or endo nature of reaction. • Structural modification can dramatically affect the cyclization mode. • If favoured trajectory of attack valid, then reaction will follow the Baldwin’s rules. Summary (1) Size Exo Endo Tet Trig Dig Tet Trig Dig 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X 6 X 7 Summary (2) Exo-Tet Exo-Trig Size enolendo enolexo enolendo enolexo 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X 6 7 References • J. E. Baldwin, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 734. • J. E. Baldwin, J. Cutting, W. Dupont, L. Kruse, L. Silberman, R. C. Thomas, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 736. • J. E. Baldwin, R. C. Thomas, L. Kruse, L. Silberman, J. Org. Chem, 1977, 42, 3846. • J. E. Baldwin, L. Kruse, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 233. • J. E. Baldwin, M. J. Lusch, Tetrahedron, 1982, 38, 2939. • C. D. Johnson, Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 476. • J. Clayden, N. Greeves, S. Warren, P. Wothers, Oxford, chapter 42, p 1140. • D. A. Evans, internet course. 30
Compartilhar