Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
CONFLICT OF INTEREST Dr. Mitchell receives research support from pharmaceutical companies, including support from Seqirus to study the safety of Afluria vac- cine in pregnancy and from GSK to develop a protocol for studying the safety of an asthma drug in pregnancy. Dr. Mitchell is a member of Biogen’s Tecfidera Pregnancy Registry Advisory Committee. VC 2016 ASCPT 1. Thorpe, P.G. et al. and the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Medications in the first trimester of pregnancy: most common exposures and critical gaps in understanding fetal risk. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 22, 1013–1018 (2013). 2. Van Bennekom, C.M., Parker, S.E., Anderka, M., Louik, C. & Mitchell, A.A. Ondansetron for the treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and the risk of birth defects [Abstract]. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 24(suppl. 1), 401–402 (2015). 3. Mitchell, A.A. Systematic identification of drugs that cause birth defects—a new opportunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 2556– 2559 (2003). 4. Mitchell, A.A. Studies of drug–induced birth defects. In Pharmacoepidemiology 5th ed (eds. Strom, B.L., Kimmel, S.E. & Hennessy, S.) 487–504 (West Sussex, UK: Wiley- Blackwell, 2012). 5. Mitchell, A.A. et al. and the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205, 51.e1–8 (2011). 6. Werler, M.M. et al. and the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Use of over-the- counter medications during pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193, 771–777 (2005). 7. FDA Public Meeting: Study Approaches and Methods to Evaluate the Safety of Drugs and Biological Products During Pregnancy in the Post-Approval Setting, May 28–29, 2014. <http://www.regulations.gov/#!docket Detail;D5FDA-2014-N-0157>. Accessed 24 February 2016. 8. Schatz, M., Chambers, C.D., Jones, K.L., Louik, C. & Mitchell, A.A. The safety of influenza immunizations and treatment during pregnancy: the Vaccines and Medications in Pregnancy Surveillance System. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 204(6 suppl. 1), S64–S68 (2011). 9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling (Drugs) Final Rule. <http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ DevelopmentApprovalProcess/ DevelopmentResources/Labeling/ucm093307. htm>. Accessed 14 February 2016. Zika Virus: A New Human Teratogen? Implications for Women of Reproductive Age L Schuler-Faccini1,2, MTV Sanseverino1,2, FSL Vianna1,2, AA da Silva1,3, M Larrandaburu1,2, C Marcolongo-Pereira4 and AM Abeche1,5 In 2015 an unprecedented increase of reports of newborns with microcephaly in Brazil made news headlines around the world. A possible etiological association with prenatal maternal infection by Zika virus (ZIKV) was suggested based on temporal and geographic distribution of ZIKV infection and the subsequent increase in the reports of microcephaly cases. Here we discuss ZIKV as a new human teratogen, with comments on potential treatment options. IS ZIKA VIRUS A NEW HUMAN TERATOGEN? To answer this question properly we will examine evidence according to Shepard’s amalgamation of criteria for proof of human teratogenicity.1 Transplacental passage Cases of Brazilian fetuses were diagnosed with microcephaly during pregnancy in which ZIKV was detected through reverse- transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the amniotic fluid.2 A Slove- nian woman who had rash and fever at the end of her first trimester of pregnancy when she was living in Brazil requested termina- tion of the pregnancy after an ultrasound at 29 weeks revealed fetal microcephaly and brain calcifications. The complete genome of the ZIKV was recovered from the fetal brain.3 Epidemiological link Oliveira et al.4 analyzed the birth prevalence of microcephaly in Brazil through the Live Birth Certificate notification, and observed a sharp increase in the number of microce- phaly cases during 2015–2016. They identi- fied temporal and geospatial correlation between the occurrence of maternal febrile rash illness and the emergence of microce- phaly in the offspring. One prospective Bra- zilian study reported the outcomes of 88 pregnant women (72 of them were tested positive for ZIKV) who developed rash in the previous 5 days. Of the 58 women who had Doppler fetal ultrasonography, fetal abnormalities were detected in 12/42 (29%) ZIKV-positive women, but in none of 16 ZIKV-negative women. Cauchemez et al.5 retrospectively analyzed serological and sur- veillance data from the 2013–2014 ZIKV outbreak in French Polynesia. They esti- mated an absolute risk of microcephaly 1SIAT, Brazilian Teratogen Information Service, Medical Genetics Service, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil; 2Post-Graduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; 3UNIVATES University, Brazil; 4Veterinary Sciences Faculty, UniRitter Laureate International Universities, Brazil; 5Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Correspondence: L Schuler-Faccini (lavinia. faccini@ufrgs.br) doi:10.1002/cpt.386 PERSPECTIVES 28 VOLUME 100 NUMBER 1 | JULY 2016 | www.wileyonlinelibrary/cpt Maria Realce Maria Realce Maria Realce Maria Realce Maria Realce Maria Realce Maria Realce Maria Realce Maria Realce associated with ZIKV infection ranging from 34 to 191/10,000 women infected during the first trimester of pregnancy. They could not evaluate risks associated with infection in the second or third trimester. Distinct symptomatology A consistent clinical pattern of the sug- gested Zika embryopathy is emerging.6 The observations from published cases show microcephaly (usually head circumference below 3 SD of the mean) with marked head/face disproportionality, scalp and/or occipital redundant skin folds, and promi- nent occiput. Clubfoot and arthrogryposis are frequently seen and might represent a consequence of the cortical damage. On neurological examination, the infants pres- ent irritability, hyperreflexia, hypertonia or spasticity, tremors, and seizures. Macular atrophy in the retina was observed and des- cribed. Brain abnormalities observed by ne- uroimaging and postmortem exams include markedly small brains, ventriculomegaly, multifocal brain calcifications, abnormal gyration (agyria, lissencephaly, polymicro- gyria), and severe abnormalities of midline structures and the cerebellum, suggesting early damage of the developing brain. Although some of these characteristics are common to congenital infections as brain calcifications, in general the clinical effect is much more severe than cytomegalovirus, rubella, or toxoplasmosis. Rare exposure and rare defect This criterion is not valid for ZIKV infec- tion, because of a wide exposure and a prevalent outcome (microcephaly). Teratogenicity in experimental animals Zika is an arbovirus member of the Flavi- viridea family. Many arboviruses are known to act as teratogens with a preeminent neu- rotropism in domestic and wild animals both experimentally and as in naturally occurring infections. In ruminants, pigs, and sheep some viruses in this group pro- duce a phenotype quite similar to Zika infection in humans, including hydranence- phaly, porencephaly, microencephaly, cere- bellar hypoplasia, chorioretinopathy, and arthrogryposis.7 Biological plausibility Finally, it has been shown that a Zika strain (MR766) is able to infect human neural progenitor cells (hNPCs), and dys- regulates cell-cycle progression, increases cell death, and alters global gene expression. In their experiment, hNPCs were the direct target of ZIKV.8 As described above, evidence of ZIKV as a human teratogen is accumulating. How- ever, the exact probability of the fetal dam- ages after maternal ZIKV infection is not yetknown, including pregnancy stage- specific risks. Most of the cases described in the literature are of severe brain damage caused after infection in the first half of pregnancy. As described above, the study from Brazil followed women with con- firmed ZIKV infection at any time during pregnancy and detected 29% of abnormal- ities among 42 women who underwent pre- natal ultrasonographic studies.4 Besides the brain abnormalities, the authors observed increased fetal loss, placental insufficiency, and fetal growth restriction. It is possible, therefore, that brain destruction might be only part of a spectrum of neurological damage, and there is still a gap of knowl- edge of the third trimester outcomes after infection. The clinical progression of affected new- borns is related to the severity of the brain damage. Newborns examined frequently show neurological abnormalities: hyperto- nia or spasticity, tremors, irritability, hyper- reflexia, and seizures. However, at present we cannot predict the long-term cognitive/ neurological development of those with milder brain abnormalities or even without clinical signs at birth, including normal head circumference. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE? POSSIBILITIES OF TREATMENT AND PREVENTION The amount of evidence now strongly sug- gests that ZIKV is a new human teratogen. Effective vaccine or treatment is not avail- able yet and many questions are still unan- swered, with important implications for the counseling of women of reproductive age. Moreover, advice is different for women residing in regions with active ZIKV trans- mission from those who do not. Modes of transmission and contagious periods The main mode of transmission of ZIKV is through the bite of infected Aedes mos- quitoes. However, there are some case reports of sexual transmission from the male to his sexual partners, and ZIKV was detected in semen up to 62 days after infec- tion, prompting advice to men with ZIKV disease to avoid attempting conception for at least 6 months after symptoms.9 Although transplacental transmission has been confirmed, there is no evidence that ZIKV can cause congenital infection in pregnancies conceived after the resolution of maternal viremia. Women are advised to wait 8 weeks to attempt conception after the beginning of the symptoms if she had the symptomatic infection. Both women and men with possible exposure to ZIKV (travel or residence in an area of active ZIKV), but asymptomatic should also wait at least 8 weeks after exposure to attempt conception.9 It is not known, however, if ZIKV infection provides a long-lasting immunity, like rubella, for example. Diagnosis The gold standard is the gene-detection test by RT-PCR on serum to detect virus, viral nucleic acid. However, the majority of exposures to ZIKV may cause an asymp- tomatic infection, so the large majority of infected pregnant women may remain undiagnosed. Serological tests can be diffi- cult to interpret because ZIKV is closely linked to dengue, and the serologic samples may crossreact. Vaccines Efficient vaccines are already available for a number of flavivirus, such as yellow fever (live attenuated virus). Recently, the tetrava- lent chimeric live attenuated dengue vaccine was approved for use in several dengue- endemic countries. Therefore, although not presently available, similar approaches are being explored to advance vaccine for ZIKV. Potential treatment of viremia Current therapeutic options for flavivirus infections are essentially based on support- ive care. No specific antiviral therapy is approved for ZIKV (nor for any flavivirus). Supportive care includes rest, antipyretics, analgesics, and antihistamines for PERSPECTIVES CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS | VOLUME 100 NUMBER 1 | JULY 2016 29 cutaneous symptoms if necessary. Nonster- oidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin should be delayed until dengue can be ruled out to reduce the possibility of hemorrhagic complications. Due to its sim- ilarity to dengue, some antiviral therapies can be explored. A few agents like chloro- quine, balapiravir, and celgosivir were already assessed by clinical trials in dengue- infected humans. Unfortunately, there was no evidence of effective reduction in plasma viremia.10 Moreover, we do not know much about the biology of the Zika virus and if it is similar to dengue. There- fore, animal models are essential for vaccine and therapeutic development. Recently, Tang et al.8 were able to establish an exper- imental system based on ZIKV infection of hNPCs that can provide a platform to screen therapeutic compounds. Finally, since pregnant women will be the major target for ZIKV therapy, the potential tera- togenicity or toxicity of the drug itself should be carefully considered in the selec- tion of a potential antiviral therapy. CONCLUSION While effective vaccines or antiviral treat- ment is not available, prevention of ZIKV infection is crucial. Effective control of the vector is mandatory. Women of reproduc- tive age should be fully informed about the risks and protective measures to avoid mos- quito bites if they live or travel to regions where active transmission is ongoing. Pre- conception counseling, family planning, and contraceptive methods should be immedi- ately provided and of easy access for every woman, independent of socioeconomic sta- tus. Guidance for healthcare providers car- ing for women of reproductive age with possible ZIKV exposure is published and periodically updated by the Centers for Dis- ease Control and Prevention.9 CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest. VC 2016 ASCPT 1. Shepard, T.H. “Proof” of human teratogenicity. Teratology 50, 97–98 (1994). 2. Brasil, P. et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro— preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. (2016); e-pub ahead of print (doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1602412). 3. Mlakar, J. et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 951–958 (2016). 4. Oliveira, W.K. et al. Increase in reported prevalence of microcephaly in infants born to women living in areas with confirmed zika virus transmission during the first trimester of pregnancy—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 65, 242–247 (2016). 5. Cauchemez, S. et al. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013-15: a retrospective study. Lancet (2016); e-pub ahead of print (doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(16)00651-6). 6. Schuler-Faccini, L. et al. Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 65, 59–62 (2016). 7. Agerholm, J.S. et al. Virus-induced congenital malformations in cattle. Acta Vet. Scand. 57, 54–68 (2015). 8. Tang, H. et al. Zika virus infects human cortical neural progenitors and attenuates their growth. Cell StemCell<http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.016> (2016). 9. Petersen, E.E. et al. Interim guidance for health care providers caring for women of reproductive age with possible zika virus exposure—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. (2016); e-pub ahead of print. 10. Simmons, C.P. et al. Recent advances in dengue pathogenesis and clinical management. Vaccine 33, 7061–7068 (2015). PERSPECTIVES 30 VOLUME 100 NUMBER 1 | JULY 2016 | www.wileyonlinelibrary/cpt
Compartilhar