Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12020093 Why positive psychology is necessary Article in American Psychologist · April 2001 DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.216 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS 677 READS 30,451 2 authors: Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: StepUp! Development and Validation of a Motivational Program to Prevent Early School Leaving View project Exploring the Relative Autonomy Continuum View project Kennon Sheldon University of Missouri 200 PUBLICATIONS 28,451 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Laura A King University of Missouri 130 PUBLICATIONS 13,890 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Laura A King on 19 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12020093_Why_positive_psychology_is_necessary?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12020093_Why_positive_psychology_is_necessary?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_3&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/project/StepUp-Development-and-Validation-of-a-Motivational-Program-to-Prevent-Early-School-Leaving?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_9&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/project/Exploring-the-Relative-Autonomy-Continuum?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_9&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_1&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kennon_Sheldon?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_4&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kennon_Sheldon?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_5&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Missouri?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_6&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kennon_Sheldon?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_7&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Laura_King5?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_4&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Laura_King5?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_5&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/institution/University_of_Missouri?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_6&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Laura_King5?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_7&_esc=publicationCoverPdf https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Laura_King5?enrichId=rgreq-3ae4b8a61087dc10c3fa92a1f811c1f5-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzEyMDIwMDkzO0FTOjk4NjQwNjIyMjYwMjM0QDE0MDA1MjkxNjYwNDA%3D&el=1_x_10&_esc=publicationCoverPdf POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY Why Positive Psychology Is Necessary Kennon M. Sheldon Laura King University of Missouri—Columbia Southern Methodist University The authors provide a definition of positive psychology and suggest that psychologists should try to cultivate a more appreciative perspective on human nature. Examples are given of a negative bias that seems to pervade much of theoretical psychology, which may limit psychologists' un- derstanding of typical and successful human functioning. Finally, a preview of the articles in the special section is given. What is positive psychology? It is nothing morethan the scientific study of ordinary humanstrengths and virtues. Positive psychology re- visits "the average person," with an interest in finding out what works, what is right, and what is improving. It asks, "What is the nature of the effectively functioning human being, who successfully applies evolved adaptations and learned skills? And how can psychologists explain the fact that, despite all the difficulties, the majority of people manage to live lives of dignity and purpose?" As such, we argue that positive psychology is simply psychology. That is, just as other natural and social sci- ences try to describe the typical structure and natural func- tioning of their topics of interest, so should psychology. Also, just as other scientists express profound appreciation for their topic of study (i.e., the physicist who admires the elegance of Einstein's equations, or the archaeologist who marvels at the achievements of ancient peoples), so should psychologists. Positive psychology is thus an attempt to urge psy- chologists to adopt a more open and appreciative perspec- tive regarding human potentials, motives, and capacities. Such an endeavor is surprisingly difficult within psychol- ogy's reductionist epistemological traditions, which train one to view positivity with suspicion, as a product of wishful thinking, denial, or hucksterism. It is probably appropriate that psychologists receive such training be- cause all people are prone to be taken in, at least at times, by their own delusions and wishes. However, we suggest that such skepticism, taken too far, may itself constitute a negativity bias that prevents a clear understanding of reality. Indeed, it is becoming increasingly clear that the nor- mal functioning of human beings cannot be accounted for within purely negative (or problem-focused) frames of reference. In fact, the majority of the human race achieves a state of thriving, rating themselves as happy and satisfied with their lives (Meyers, 2000). Unfortunately, psycholo- gists still know relatively little about human thriving and how to encourage it not only because they have not given this question the resources it deserves but, more important, because they have worn blinders that have prevented them from even recognizing the value of the question. To illustrate the predominant negative bias of tradi- tional psychology, consider the following: Clinical psy- chologists have focused the majority of their attention on the diagnosis and treatment of pathologies, and in the quest for "fixes," scant attention has been paid to the nature of psychological health. Practitioners of social cognitive psy- chology have devoted vast attention to the biases, delu- sions, illusions, foibles, and errors of the human being. Those who study evolutionary and economic psychology have long assumed the sovereignty of selfishness. Freud gave dominance to the animalistic id, whereas contempo- rary terror management theorists give dominance to the fear of death. An OVID search on the terms error and bias yielded far more hits (18,913) than did a search on the terms strength and virtue (7,423). More specific examples bring this negative bias into sharper focus. When a research participant looks back on his life and concludes that he is abetter man now than he was earlier, psychologists are quick to label it a self-serving delusion, a temporal bias, a mere emotion-regulation strat- egy. When a participant sees her partner as being better than the partner perceives himself or herself, this is viewed as a backhanded way for the participant to inflate her own self-esteem. When a stranger helps another person, psy- chologists are quick to find the selfish benefit in the act, unwilling to acknowledge the existence of altruism. Indeed, the negative bias, once identified, can be found lurking almost everywhere in theoretical psychology. Again, we Editor's note. Kennon M. Sheldon and Laura King developed this Positive Psychology section. Author's note. Kennon M. Sheldon, Department of Psychology, Univer- sity of Missouri—Columbia; Laura King, Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ken- non M. Sheldon, Department of Psychology, 210 McAlester Hall, Uni- versity of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. Electronic mail may be sent to sheldonk@missouri.edu. 216 March 2001 • American Psychologist Copyright 2001 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0003-066X/01/S5 00 Vol. 56, No. 3, 216-217 DOI: 1O.1O37//OOO3-O66X.56.3.216 Kennon M. Sheldon Laura King believe this bias prevents psychologists from perceiving many important human processes, outcomes, and strengths. In selecting the articles for this special section, we tried to illustrate some of the best of the new positive psychology, to show the exciting and potentially transform- ing new questions thai can be asked once one adopis a more appreciative perspective. For example, why are positive emotions so important? {This is something everyone knows intuitively, but it has been the topic of relatively little study in psychology.) Barbara L. Frederickson's (2001, this is- sue) broaden-and-buitd theory of positive emotions offers a promising answer to this question, namely, that positive emotions facilitate the creation of important skills and resources. Why are the majority of humans around the world very satisfied with their lives despite (heir objective difficulties (Meyers, 2000)? Perhaps it is because of the ordinary but unappreciated magic of human resilience. In her article, Ann S. Masten (2001, this issue) discusses the remarkable adjustive capacities that resilience researchers now view as being part of every human's innate equipment. Nevertheless, some people are even happier than the rest of us—why is this? Sonja Lyubormirsky's (2001, this issue) article addresses this question, showing that happiness may really be "in our head": as folk wisdom has long asserted, happy people appreciate what they have, without dwelling on what they do not have. Finally, is it possible for positive psychology to also be realistic psychology, or is this an oxymoron? Sandra L. Schneider's (2001, this issue) article tackles this question, showing that there is a fuzzy range of factual knowledge and possible interpretations that allows positive or optimistic construals to be just as potentially accurate as any other construal. At the same time, positive construals are also more adaptive, in that they help to actually bring about the optimist's vision. As readers peruse this special section, we hope they will agree that psychologists should focus more attention on the positive aspects of human nature. If psychologists allow themselves to see the best as well as the worst in people, they may derive important new understanding of human nature and destiny. REFERENCES Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Amer- ican Psychologist, 56, 2)8-226. Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier lhan others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes in weil-being. American Psychologist. 56, 239-249. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in develop- ment. American Psychnlogisi, 56, 227-238. Meyers, D. (2000). The friends, funds, antl faith of happy people. Amer- ican Psychologist, 55, 56-67. Schneider, S. L. (2001). In search of realistic optimism: Meaning, knowl- edge, and warm fuzziness. American Psyc/tologisi. 56, 250-263. March 2001 • American Psychologist 217 View publication statsView publication stats https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12020093
Compartilhar