Prévia do material em texto
978-1-5090-6241-6/17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEE Passive Optical Networks: Present Status and Future Outlook (Invited Paper) Murilo A. Romero Electrical and Computer Engineering Department University of Sao Paulo – EESC/USP São Carlos, Brazil murilo.romero@usp.br Abstract—This invited paper discusses the present status and evolution trends for passive optical networks (PONs). A brief historical overview is provided, leading to the recent NGPON2 (T-WDM) standard. Next, the main technological contenders for the future PON generations are discussed. Emphasis is given on the WDM-PON self-seeded configuration. Keywords—optical access, passive optical networks, GPON, wavelength division multiplexing, WDM-PON. I. INTRODUCTION Access networks have evolved drastically in recent years, driven by the disruptive demand for bandwidth-hungry services and applications, including HDTV, video-on-demand and cloud computing, among others. In addition, issues such as quality of service (QoS) and energy consumption now play an increasingly larger role, in a scenario where the number of subscribers, the variety of services and the network throughput all experience continuous growth. Traditional wireline technologies, such as HFC and x-DSL, clearly cannot keep up with all those requirements. In fact, even the most advanced digital subscriber line (DSL) access networks, based on the VDSL2 standard, cannot deliver much more than 25 Mbits/s, even over distances as short as 600 meters. FTTH (Fiber-to-the-Home) optical fiber architectures become a natural solution to address the reach and bandwidth challenges. The most obvious network configuration is a point-to-point (PtP) deployment, where each end user is connected to a central office (CO) by means of a dedicated optical fiber and Ethernet switches. However, the growth in the number of subscribers leads to unmanageable increase, both in the fiber count and the number of Ethernet ports. For this reason, the Full Service Access Network (FSAN) working group, composed initially by seven telecommunications service providers and system vendors, was created in 1995. The goal was to agree upon a point-to- multipoint passive optical network (PON) tree architecture, in which the downstream optical signal power transmitted by the OLT (Optical Line Terminal, at the CO) passes through a single feeder fiber before being divided by a passive optical splitter, in order to simultaneously connect a large number of multiple subscribers (Optical Network Terminals, ONTs). In upstream transmission, the optical splitter becomes a power combiner and the several ONTs are assigned to specific time slots, usually managed by means of some kind of time division multiplexing access (TDMA) protocol. System parameters such as optical fiber reach of 20 km, average data rate per user of 40 Mb/s and splitting ratios of 32 subscribers, were already common place even in the initial PON generations [1], making these technologies very attractive for broadband access. In fact, during the five-year period between 2000-2005, capital expenditure (CAPEX) for FTTH installation had dropped by a factor of four while operation-and-maintenance-expense (OPEX) costs could be reduced by about 125 US dollars (per year, per user) when the legacy DSL copper plant is replaced by fiber optics [2]. This improved outlook boosted the efforts by the FSAN and lead to the standardization of the Gigabit Capable Passive Optical Network (G-PON) by the ITU-T, in 2009. Since the G.984-x series consolidation [3], efforts have been carried out in order to increase the data rate provided to the end users by the TDM technologies. Those efforts resulted on the standardizations of both the 10 Gigabit Capable Passive Optical Network (XG-PON) [4] as well as the Time-and- Wavelength Division Multiplexing Passive Optical Networks (TWDM-PON) [5] in a relatively short period of time (2010– 2015). The more recent TWDM-PON standard, widely known in the literature as NG-PON2 (next-generation PON 2), is designed to aggregate up to eight independent channels, each one carrying up 10 Gb/s (80 Gb/s network capacity overall). Alternative optical access techniques, such as pure WDM- PON, OFDM-PON and coherent-PON have been actively proposed and pursued by research groups worldwide. However, for the moment, TWDM techniques are not only capable of fulfilling the data rate requirements for FTTH services, but are also expected to be a longstanding technology, both in market predictions and FSAN expectations [6, 19]. Therefore, two questions can be immediately brought up: a) when a next-generation passive optical networks (NGPON 3) will be needed ? b) which technological options are available ? Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Nacional De Telecomunicações (INATEL). Downloaded on November 22,2024 at 19:36:31 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. To help answer those questions, we review the evolution path of PONs, through the standardized technologies in each generation. Next, we discuss how PONs might move forward, based not only on WDM-PON, in general, but also on the qualitative analysis of our own WDM-PON self-seeded topologies results [7-10]. Other completely different approaches found in the literature, including OFDM-PON and coherent PON [11-12], will also be discussed. The paper is organized as follows: In section II the standardized PONs are described. In section III we discuss the most promising candidates for PON evolution and carry out a discussion on the next steps of research in PONs. Whenever appropriate, the technical contributions from our research group at the University of Sao Paulo will be contextualized. II. PASSIVE OPTICAL NETWORK GENERATIONS Passive optical networks have been installed around the world in two basic variants: GPON and EPON (Ethernet PON), put forward by the IEEE 802.3 family of standards. Both are based on TDMA access and NRZ line coding but differ on protocol details, power budget and aggregated data rates, among other features [13]. EPON is generally dominant in South Korea and Japan while GPON has been more widely deployed in Europe, US and, also, Brazil. In this paper, we will focus more closely on the ITUT-T activities but the EPON standards will be mentioned when needed. Work at the FSAN started in the mid-90´s. The initial version of the ITU-T G.983 standard used Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) as the TDMA access protocol and was referred to as ATM-PON. Subsequent versions of the standard were renamed broadband PON (BPON). A typical BPON deployment based on the ITU-T G983.1 version provided 622 Mbit/s downstream rates and 155 Mbit/s for the upstream traffic. The later versions of this family of standards accommodated higher rates: for the ITU-T G983.3, there is the possibility of symmetrical 622 Mbit/s traffic or asymmetrical 1.244 Gbits/s-622 Mbit/s for downstream and upstream aggregate rates, respectively [14]. The ITU-T G.984 GPON standard represented an evolution not only regarding data rates but also on protocol efficiency, by handling variable-length packets and distinct classes of traffic. Specifically, the GPON Encapsulation Method (GEM), designed after the ITU-T G.7041 Generic Framing Procedure (GFP), allows very flexible transport of network data, efficiently mixing ATM cells, Ethernet frames and TDM (voice) traffic [3]. The standard allows 7 combinations of downstream/upstream bit rates. Among those, the most usual network capacities are 1.244 Gbit/s for upstream and 2.488 Gbit/s for downstream. The typical physical distance between OLT and ONTs is around 20 km, while the logical distance, determined by the interplay between the GPON ranging protocol and the signal round-trip time, is 60km. Longer-reach operation using conventional GPON equipment/SLV /SUO /SVE /TUR /ENU (Use these settings to create Adobe PDF documents suitable for reliable viewing and printing of business documents. Created PDF documents can be opened with Acrobat and Adobe Reader 5.0 and later.) >> >> setdistillerparams > setpagedeviceis possible and was already demonstrated by our research group, by means of adjustments at the time- cycle of the OLT ranging process as well as optical amplification [15]. In fact, long-reach (LR) PONs (> 100km) may be an attractive solution from a networking point of view, by reducing the number of central-office (CO) nodes and consolidating equipment usage within the network. This is because a long-reach configuration allows the elimination of the metro-ring backhaul, by connecting the access network directly to the optical backbone [16]. Several groups, including ourselves, have investigated the amplification options for the LR configuration, not only SOAs [15] but also EDFAs and Raman amplifiers [17]. After GPON, the next drive of evolution was to increase the data rate provided to the end users by the TDM architecture. This lead to the 10 Gb/s PONs (ITU-T XG-PON) standard. In 2009, when the standard was proposed, the data rates were defined as asymmetrical: 10Gbits/s downstream but only 2.5 Gbits/s upstream. At that time, the main focus of PON technologies was residential customers and it was widely accepted that those asymmetrical rates would suffice, without the need for a costly 10 Gbits/s transmitter at the subscriber side. In addition, it should be noted that the upstream TDMA access scheme of the XGPON operates by assigning specific time-slots for the ONTs in the network. Since each ONT in the system is located at a different physical distance from the OLT, the OLT optical receiver need to operate in burst-mode, with a decision-threshold level adjustment every time the ONT being interrogated is changed. The design of the required hardware to operate this process at 10Gbits/s was considered to be challenging, also contributing to the selection of an asymmetrical XGPON architecture. Just a few years later, the cost difference had dropped and, also, the focus of PON technologies shifted away from the residential customer to a more mixed portfolio, including business services and backhaul/front-haul in high-speed mobile networks, which favor symmetric data rates. That is why the symmetric XG-PON configuration was brought into play, under the name XGS-PON, in line with the IEEE 10GEPON system [4]. Next, in 2011, the FSAN proposed the NG-PON2, a time- and-wavelength division multiplexing (T-WDM) PON which increases the overall system capacity by stacking up to eight wavelengths in each transmission direction, all modulated at the same data rate as the XG-PON or XGS-PON [19]. From a network operator point of view, the architecture is very attractive, because it can be deployed over the conventional GPON optical distribution network (ODN), splitters included, while allowing the reuse of the XG-PON transceiver technology. The essentials of T-WDM PON were agreed upon by the ITU-T in 2012 and for the immediate future, in short and medium terms, the major trend seems to be an increase in channel date rate to 25 Gbits/s (40 Gbits/s possibly would require duobinary modulation, in order to alleviate chromatic dispersion effects), in parallel to the evolution path taken by the EPON family, given that the IEEE P802.3ca task force Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Nacional De Telecomunicações (INATEL). Downloaded on November 22,2024 at 19:36:31 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. was established to propose the standardization of 25 and 100G EPONs [20]. Fig. 1: Photo of the electronic channel selector circuit, part of an optoelectronic receiver for WDM-PON [18]. To the left, four microwave switches (3 FETs each, in a π−shaped connection) select the detected wavelength to be amplified by the transimpedance amplifier (right side). To finish this section, it is worth mentioning that, in the late 90´s, still in the ATM-PON era, our research group at University of Sao Paulo investigated a PON network topology similar to today´s NG-PON2 [18]. However, we devised a fairly complex dynamic bandwidth allocation scheme in the wavelength domain, requiring fast tuning (ns range) for the tunable optical receivers. Since those fast tuning speeds cannot be attained with conventional optical filters (even including those today under consideration for NG-PON2), the essence of the project was to design a tunable receiver architecture, without tunable optical filters. Specifically, in our design, the incoming wavelengths were demultiplexed in the optical domain and photodetected, each wavelength by its own PIN photodiode. In other words, the tunable optical filter is replaced by a fixed demux and an array of PDs. Next, a electronic selector circuit composed by FET microwave switches and a transimpedance amplifier selects the wavelength to be processed (see Fig. 1). The work was carried out in collaboration with the University of Rome, Tor Vergata, and both 4x1 and 16x1 circuits were successfully demonstrated, with tuning times smaller than 2 ns [18]. III. BEYOND TWDM-PON The predominant view today within the FSAN is that there will be no need for a NG-PON3 standard for the next few years, entering into the next decade [19]. On one hand, the mix of available standards, composed by GPON (focusing on residential subscribers), XGS-PON (possibly able to meet most business needs) and NG-PON2 (with 80 Gbits/s overall capacity and possibility of adding additional PtP WDM links) should be able to address all demands for bandwidth, even considering the most stringent new driver: backhaul/fronthaul in 5G mobile networks. In addition, two new standards (XGPON and NG-PON2) were introduced in a relatively short 5-year period. Therefore, it will take some time for these two technologies to be fully established within the telecom market, thereby assuring complete interoperability between distinct vendors [19]. For the longer term (maybe by 2025), there are a variety of technological options to move forward as NG-PON3, which were already considered when FSAN was discussing NG- PON2 [21] and could potentially provide disruptive increases in network capacity: self-seeded WDM-PON, coherent-PON and OFDM-PON. Among those options, WDM-PON have been proposed and investigated very intensively, since the early 90´s (see [22] for an excellent review on this early work). In simple terms, in the WDM-PON configuration each ONT in the network can receive a dedicated wavelength, on a permanent basis. In other words, WDM-PON establishes a logical PtP network topology. Despite the very large bandwidth offered by WDM-PON architectures, the choice of the T-WDM technology to base the NGPON-2 standard was related not only to technological maturity (XG-PON transceivers could be reused) but also because it could employ the same ODN, splitters included, as previous PON generations, thereby avoiding the need to replace power splitters by wavelength demultiplexers, the AWGs. In fact, although there has been reports of commercial operation of WDM-PON networks in South Korea [23, 28], a major hurdle to widespread deployment of WDM-PONs has been the need of WDM-PON to be backward compatible with the previous generations of PONs, thereby coexisting on the same ODN. It should pointed out, however, that the problem of coexistence between TDM and WDM-PON schemes is not unsurmountable. It has been addressed in the literature and graceful migration strategies can be devised [24, 28]. One of the possibilities is illustrated in Fig. 2 [24]. Another issue posing a hurdle for widespread WDM-PON dissemination is the need for each ONT to have its own upstream wavelength. The simplest solution, to use fixed wavelength transmitters, creates a formidable burden in terms of operational costs, given that a high number of different laser devices (equaling the number of wavelengths in use), must be kept in inventory by the network operator. This issue has been identified since the very early daysof WDM-PON research. The answer is to develop WDM-PON architectures in which the same hardware is used to generate any wavelength required by a given ONT. The most obvious of those colorless sources would be to use identical tunable lasers at each ONT, where each laser is then tuned to a specific and pre-assigned upstream wavelength. Tunable lasers for T-WDM PON have been developed by starting from conventional DWDM tunable transmitter modules and eliminating features such as thermoelectric coolers and wavelength-lockers, in order to reduce costs [25]. Concerning tunable lasers for more demanding WDM-PON applications, multi-section DFB lasers are promising but the technology is still maturing, as the continuous tuning range is typically below 10 nm [26] and the device may suffer from instability and mode hopping. Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Nacional De Telecomunicações (INATEL). Downloaded on November 22,2024 at 19:36:31 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. CO OLT XGS-PON (legacy) Tx,Rx, λ2 M UXTx,Rx, λ17 Feeder Fiber RN WC1 WC2 AW G PS λ1 λ1 λ1 λ2 λ17 λ2 λ17 λ4 ONTs Fig. 2: Proposed coexistence strategy between XGS-PON and WDM-PON (adapted and modified from [24]). In the CO premises there are XGS-PON and WDM-PON (16 wavelengths) equipments. All 17 lambdas are launched together into the feeder fiber by the wavelength coupler WC1 and decoupled at the remote node by WC2. λ1 is the XGS-PON designated wavelength passing through the power splitter (PS) and sent the XGS-PON ONTs (in black). The other 16 lambdas are demultiplexed by an Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG) and sent to the WDM-ONTs (in grey). Eventually, one (or more) of the WDM-PON wavelengths can be diverted to the legacy PON (λ8, dashed lines, in the picture above), progressively creating a T-WDM scheme, “pay as you go”. Due to the lack of tunable lasers, the initial experiments on WDM-PONs during the 90´s were often based on the spectral slicing of broadband incoherent light sources (BLS), such as LEDs or the ASE from an EDFA [22]. As expected, those attempts suffered from several problems, including power budget issues. That is why subsequent experiments reported in the literature used the BLS not to generate the optical carrier itself but to provide an optical seed to lock an specific wavelength within the gain bandwidth of an active semiconductor device located at the ONT. Such externally seeded optical sources were first implemented in the form of injection-locked Fabry-Perot semiconductor lasers [27] but there are some drawbacks. Even with the use of long-cavity lasers to increase the modal content, the locking range and, consequently, the number of available wavelength channels are limited. Alternatively, in later work colorless ONTs are often based on reflective semiconductor optical amplifiers (RSOAs) and the optical seed for the upstream carrier is generally provided by the optical line terminal (OLT) at the central office (CO) [28]. The technology is mature and has been installed for commercial operation by Korea Telecom in Gwangju, since March 2009 [28]. However, the whole architecture is dependent on a single BLS ASE source at the OLT. In other words, a BLS failure brings down the whole WDM-PON network. This is one of the motivations behind the self- seeding scheme, in which the optical seed required for upstream transmission is provided by the RSOA itself [29]. Specifically, the ASE output light from each RSOA is spectrally sliced by an AWG at a remote node (RN) and injected back into the RSOA by means of a reflective optical path. Colorless operation is possible because each AWG arm will provide a distinct wavelength seed. In our work [8], we developed a WDM-PON architecture (Fig. 3) in which self-seeding occurs in RSOAs located at the OLT, allowing upstream transmission based on wavelength reuse and carrier remodulation at the ONT. This remodulation scheme allows the sharing of a single wavelength for both data flows, enabling more efficient optical spectral usage because the same wavelength per user can be employed for both traffic directions. Downstream data is erased by operating the RSOA in deep saturation and crosstalk between downstream and upstream data can be further minimized by using distinct extinction ratios in each direction, associated to proper electronic hardware at the ONT [8]. (a) Fig. 3: Top (a): Self-seeding architecture where FRM is the Faraday rotator mirror, the reflective element used to avoid instabilities caused by polarization fluctuations [30]. Bottom (b) BER optical transmission measurements up to 140 km [31]. Accordingly to Fig. 3(b) we were able to demonstrate optical transmission within the BER-limit up to a distance of 140km, with a 2.7 power penalty compared to the back-to- back condition. In the literature, most experiments (including ours) have been performed at 1.25 Gb/s. However, the recent development of high-speed RSOAs has allowed 10 Gb/s operation, not only at the conventional C-band, but also at the O-band [32], making possible to explore a generally untapped wavelength band for PON applications. Finally, in yet another demonstration that self-seeding is ready for commercial deployment, Huawei has carried out the field-test of a full mobile fronthaul in a LTE environment [33]. Regarding the future NG-PON3, beyond WDM-PON self- seeding, the two other main contenders are OFDM [11] and Ultra-Dense Coherent PON [12]. In short, both OFDM and coherent PONs are very powerful albeit complex techniques, relying heavily on expensive high-speed DSP processors. OFDM configurations allow excellent bandwidth granularity. This is because downstream traffic to a particular ONT can be transported by a flexible mix of OFDM subcarriers and Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Nacional De Telecomunicações (INATEL). Downloaded on November 22,2024 at 19:36:31 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. timeslots. For upstream transmission, OFDMA bandwidth allocation schemes are implemented [11]. On the other hand, ultra-dense WDM coherent PONs [12] take advantage of the recent advances in coherent transmission and digital signal processing techniques related to the 100G QPSK standard for backbone networks. It is a very spectrally efficient technique because coherent detection allows very closed spaced channels and huge network capacity. Although today´s transceivers are still too costly for practical deployment in access networks, those costs are likely to come down as the 100G QPSK standard for core networks matures and moves deeper into mass production. In conclusion, among the three options, self- seeding is probably the most cost-effective today. However, OFDM has potential for faster cost reduction and coherent access techniques maybe ready for some niche high-capacity applications by the time when the NG-PON 3 standardization process is under way. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank his former graduate students Getúlio E.R. de Paiva, Stilante K. Manfrim and Ulysses R. Duarte and many collaborators, in particular, João B. Rosolem (CPqD), Franco Giannini and Giancarlo Orengo (Univ. Rome, Tor Vergata). Over the years, this research was supported by the CPqD Foundation, by the Brazilian branch of NEC as well as by the funding agencies CNPq and Fapesp. REFERENCES [1] P.W. Shumate, “Fiber-to-the-home: 1977-2007,” J. Lightwave Technology, vol. 26, pp. 1093-1103, May-June 2008. [2] C-H. Lee, W.V. Sorin, and B.Y. Kim, “Fiber to the Home Using a PON Infrastructure,” J. Lightw. Tech., vol. 24, pp. 4568-4583, Dec. 2006. [3] ITU-T G.984, “Series of recommendations, Gigabit-capable passive optical network (G-PON) systems,” 2009. [4] ITU-T G.987, “Series of recommendations, 10-gigabit-capable passive optical network (XG-PON) systems,” 2012.. [5] ITU-T G.989,“Series of recommendations, 40-gigabit-capable passive optical network (NG-PON) systems,” 2015.. [6] F.J. Effenberger, "Industrial Trends and Roadmap of Access," J. Lightwave Technology, vol. 35, pp. 1142-1146, March 2017. [7] U. R. Duarte, R.S. Penze, J.B. Rosolem and M.A. Romero, "Combined self-seeding and carrier remodulation method for reflective transmitters in WDM-PON", Optical Fiber Communications Conf., OFC Technical Digest, paper JTh2A.72, Anaheim, CA, 2013. [8] U. R. Duarte, R.S. Penze, J.B. Rosolem and M.A. Romero; “Combined self-seeding and carrier remodulation scheme for WDM-PON”, J. Lightwave Technology, Vol. 31, pp. 1323-1330, August 2013. [9] U. R. Duarte, J.B. Rosolem, R.S. Penze and M.A. Romero “Analysis of ASE-Related Impairments on Wavelength-Reuse WDM-PONs Based on Self-Seeded Reflective SOAs”, Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 6, pp. 773-781, August 2014. [10] U. R. Duarte and M.A. Romero, “Enhancement of maximum reach on spectrum-sliced ASE systems employing self-seeded reflective-SOAs transmitters", Electronics Letters, Vol. 52, pp. 130-131, January 2016. [11] N. Cvijetic, “OFDM for next-generation optical access networks,” IEEE J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 384–398, Feb. 2012. [12] J.D. Reis et. al., “Terabit+ (192×10 Gb/s) Nyquist Shaped UDWDM Coherent PON With Upstream and Downstream Over a 12.8 nm Band”, J. Lightwave Technology, Vol. 32, pp. 729-735, April 2014. [13] F. Effenberger et. al., “An introduction to PON technologies” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. S17–S25, March 2007. [14] ITU-T G.983, "Series of recommendations, Broadband passive optical network (BPON) systems," 2006. [15] G.E.R Paiva, M. Freire, U. R. Duarte, J.B. Rosolem and M.A. Romero, "80 km Extended Gigabit Passive Optical Network", 2011 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference - IMOC'11 Proceedings, Natal, Brazil, 2011. [16] H. Song, B.-W. Kim, and B. Mukherjee, “Long-reach optical access networks: a survey of research challenges, demonstrations, and bandwidth assignment mechanisms,” IEEE Commun. Surv.Tutorials, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 112–123, 2010. [17] U. R. Duarte, J.B. Rosolem, and M.A. Romero, "Extended WDM-PON Employing High Polarization Dependence R-SOAs and EDFA/Raman Amplification", 2012 Access Networks and In-house Comm. Conf., ANIC Technical Digest, paper JTu5A.3, Colorado Springs, CO, 2012. [18] S.K. Manfrin, “Proposal and Implementation of an Integrated Optoelectronic Receiver for ATM/PON Access Networks Employing WDM Multiplexing”, Ph.D. Thesis (in Portuguese), University of Sao Paulo, 2003. [19] D. Nesset, "PON Roadmap," Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 9, pp. A71-A76, January 2017. [20] V. Houtsma, D. Veen, and Ed Harstead, “Recent Progress on Standardization of Next-Generation 25, 50, and 100G EPON,” J. Lightwave Technology, vol. 35, pp. 1228-1234, March 2017. [21] D. Nesset, "NG-PON2 Technology and Standards," J. of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 33 pp. 1136-1143, March 2015. [22] A. Banerjee, Y. Park, F. Clarke, H. Song, S. Yang, G. Kramer, K. Kim, and B. Mukherjee, “Wavelength-division-multiplexed passive optical network (WDM-PON) technologies for broadband access: a review”, J. of Optical Networking, Vol. 4, pp. 737-758, November 2005. [23] C-H. Lee, S-M. Lee, K-M. Choi, J-H. Moon, S-G. Mun, K-T. Jeong, J. H. Kim, and B. Kim, “WDM-PON experiences in Korea”, J. of Optical Networking, Vol. 6, pp. 451-464, November 2007. [24] K-M. Choi et. al, “An Efficient Evolution Method from TDM-PON to Next-Generation PON”, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., Vol. 19, pp. 647- 649, 2007. [25] M. J. Wale, “Options and Trends for PON Tunable Optical Transceivers”, European Conf. on Optical Communications, ECOC Technical Digest, paper Mo.2.C1, Geneve, 2011. [26] L. Li et. al., “Experimental demonstration of a low-cost tunable semiconductor DFB laser for access networks”, Semicond. Sci. Tech, Vol. 29, paper 095002, 2014. [27] H. D. Kim, S.-G. Kang, and C.-H. Lee, “A low-cost WDM source with an ASE injected Fabry–Perot semiconductor laser,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. Vol. 12. 12, pp. 1067–1069, 2000. [28] J. H. Lee et al., “First Commercial Deployment of a Colorless Gigabit WDM/TDM Hybrid PON System Using Remote Protocol Terminator”, J. Lightw. Tech., 28, pp. 344–351, (2010). [29] E. Wong, K.-L. Lee and T. Anderson, "Low-cost WDM passive optical network with directly-modulated self-seeding reflective SOA", Electron. Lett., 42, pp. 299-301, 2006. [30] M. Presi and E. Ciaramella, "Stable self-seeding RSOAs for WDM- PONs," Optical Fiber Communications Conf., OFC Technical Digest, paper OMP4, 2011. [31] U.R. Duarte, “Combined Self-Seding and Wavelength Reuse Techniques for WDM-PON Reflective Transmitters”, Ph.D. Thesis (in Portuguese), University of Sao Paulo, 2015. [32] P. Parolari et. al., “C- and O-band operation of RSOA WDM PON self- seeded transmitters up to 10 Gb/s,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Vol. 7, pp. A249-A255, February 2015. [33] Y. Ma et. al., “Demonstration of digital fronthaul over self-seeded WDM-PON in commercial LTE environment, Optics Exprss, Vol. 23, pp. 11927-11935, May 2015. Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Nacional De Telecomunicações (INATEL). Downloaded on November 22,2024 at 19:36:31 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. /ArialNarrow-Italic /ArialRoundedMTBold /ArialUnicodeMS /ArrusBT-Bold /ArrusBT-BoldItalic /ArrusBT-Italic /ArrusBT-Roman /AvantGarde-Book /AvantGarde-BookOblique /AvantGarde-Demi /AvantGarde-DemiOblique /AvantGardeITCbyBT-Book /AvantGardeITCbyBT-BookOblique /BakerSignet /BankGothicBT-Medium /Barmeno-Bold /Barmeno-ExtraBold /Barmeno-Medium /Barmeno-Regular /Baskerville /BaskervilleBE-Italic /BaskervilleBE-Medium /BaskervilleBE-MediumItalic /BaskervilleBE-Regular /Baskerville-Bold /Baskerville-BoldItalic /Baskerville-Italic /BaskOldFace /Batang /BatangChe /Bauhaus93 /Bellevue /BellMT /BellMTBold /BellMTItalic /BerlingAntiqua-Bold /BerlingAntiqua-BoldItalic /BerlingAntiqua-Italic /BerlingAntiqua-Roman /BerlinSansFB-Bold /BerlinSansFBDemi-Bold /BerlinSansFB-Reg /BernardMT-Condensed /BernhardModernBT-Bold /BernhardModernBT-BoldItalic /BernhardModernBT-Italic /BernhardModernBT-Roman /BiffoMT /BinnerD /BinnerGothic /BlackadderITC-Regular /Blackoak /blex /blsy /Bodoni /Bodoni-Bold /Bodoni-BoldItalic /Bodoni-Italic /BodoniMT /BodoniMTBlack /BodoniMTBlack-Italic /BodoniMT-Bold /BodoniMT-BoldItalic /BodoniMTCondensed /BodoniMTCondensed-Bold /BodoniMTCondensed-BoldItalic /BodoniMTCondensed-Italic /BodoniMT-Italic /BodoniMTPosterCompressed /Bodoni-Poster /Bodoni-PosterCompressed /BookAntiqua /BookAntiqua-Bold /BookAntiqua-BoldItalic /BookAntiqua-Italic /Bookman-Demi /Bookman-DemiItalic /Bookman-Light /Bookman-LightItalic /BookmanOldStyle /BookmanOldStyle-Bold /BookmanOldStyle-BoldItalic /BookmanOldStyle-Italic /BookshelfSymbolOne-Regular /BookshelfSymbolSeven /BookshelfSymbolThree-Regular /BookshelfSymbolTwo-Regular /Botanical /Boton-Italic /Boton-Medium /Boton-MediumItalic /Boton-Regular /Boulevard /BradleyHandITC /Braggadocio /BritannicBold /Broadway /BrowalliaNew /BrowalliaNew-Bold /BrowalliaNew-BoldItalic /BrowalliaNew-Italic /BrowalliaUPC /BrowalliaUPC-Bold /BrowalliaUPC-BoldItalic /BrowalliaUPC-Italic /BrushScript /BrushScriptMT /CaflischScript-Bold /CaflischScript-Regular /Calibri /Calibri-Bold /Calibri-BoldItalic /Calibri-Italic /CalifornianFB-Bold /CalifornianFB-Italic /CalifornianFB-Reg /CalisMTBol /CalistoMT /CalistoMT-BoldItalic /CalistoMT-Italic /Cambria /Cambria-Bold /Cambria-BoldItalic /Cambria-Italic /CambriaMath /Candara /Candara-Bold /Candara-BoldItalic /Candara-Italic /Carta /CaslonOpenfaceBT-Regular /Castellar /CastellarMT /Centaur /Centaur-Italic /Century /CenturyGothic /CenturyGothic-Bold /CenturyGothic-BoldItalic /CenturyGothic-Italic /CenturySchL-Bold /CenturySchL-BoldItal /CenturySchL-Ital /CenturySchL-Roma /CenturySchoolbook /CenturySchoolbook-Bold /CenturySchoolbook-BoldItalic /CenturySchoolbook-Italic /CGTimes-Bold /CGTimes-BoldItalic /CGTimes-Italic /CGTimes-Regular /CharterBT-Bold /CharterBT-BoldItalic /CharterBT-Italic /CharterBT-Roman /CheltenhamITCbyBT-Bold /CheltenhamITCbyBT-BoldItalic /CheltenhamITCbyBT-Book /CheltenhamITCbyBT-BookItalic /Chiller-Regular /Cmb10 /CMB10 /Cmbsy10 /CMBSY10 /CMBSY5 /CMBSY6 /CMBSY7 /CMBSY8 /CMBSY9 /Cmbx10 /CMBX10 /Cmbx12 /CMBX12 /Cmbx5 /CMBX5 /Cmbx6 /CMBX6 /Cmbx7 /CMBX7 /Cmbx8 /CMBX8 /Cmbx9 /CMBX9 /Cmbxsl10 /CMBXSL10 /Cmbxti10 /CMBXTI10 /Cmcsc10 /CMCSC10 /Cmcsc8 /CMCSC8 /Cmcsc9 /CMCSC9 /Cmdunh10 /CMDUNH10 /Cmex10 /CMEX10 /CMEX7 /CMEX8 /CMEX9 /Cmff10 /CMFF10 /Cmfi10 /CMFI10 /Cmfib8 /CMFIB8 /Cminch /CMINCH /Cmitt10 /CMITT10 /Cmmi10 /CMMI10 /Cmmi12 /CMMI12 /Cmmi5 /CMMI5 /Cmmi6 /CMMI6 /Cmmi7 /CMMI7 /Cmmi8 /CMMI8 /Cmmi9 /CMMI9 /Cmmib10 /CMMIB10 /CMMIB5 /CMMIB6 /CMMIB7 /CMMIB8 /CMMIB9 /Cmr10 /CMR10 /Cmr12 /CMR12 /Cmr17 /CMR17 /Cmr5 /CMR5 /Cmr6 /CMR6 /Cmr7 /CMR7 /Cmr8 /CMR8 /Cmr9 /CMR9 /Cmsl10 /CMSL10 /Cmsl12 /CMSL12 /Cmsl8 /CMSL8 /Cmsl9 /CMSL9 /Cmsltt10 /CMSLTT10 /Cmss10 /CMSS10 /Cmss12 /CMSS12 /Cmss17 /CMSS17 /Cmss8 /CMSS8 /Cmss9 /CMSS9 /Cmssbx10 /CMSSBX10 /Cmssdc10 /CMSSDC10 /Cmssi10 /CMSSI10 /Cmssi12 /CMSSI12 /Cmssi17 /CMSSI17 /Cmssi8 /CMSSI8 /Cmssi9 /CMSSI9 /Cmssq8 /CMSSQ8 /Cmssqi8 /CMSSQI8 /Cmsy10 /CMSY10 /Cmsy5 /CMSY5 /Cmsy6 /CMSY6 /Cmsy7 /CMSY7 /Cmsy8 /CMSY8 /Cmsy9 /CMSY9 /Cmtcsc10 /CMTCSC10 /Cmtex10 /CMTEX10 /Cmtex8 /CMTEX8 /Cmtex9 /CMTEX9 /Cmti10 /CMTI10 /Cmti12 /CMTI12 /Cmti7 /CMTI7 /Cmti8 /CMTI8 /Cmti9 /CMTI9 /Cmtt10 /CMTT10 /Cmtt12 /CMTT12 /Cmtt8 /CMTT8 /Cmtt9 /CMTT9 /Cmu10 /CMU10 /Cmvtt10 /CMVTT10 /ColonnaMT /Colossalis-Bold /ComicSansMS /ComicSansMS-Bold /Consolas /Consolas-Bold /Consolas-BoldItalic /Consolas-Italic /Constantia /Constantia-Bold /Constantia-BoldItalic /Constantia-Italic /CooperBlack /CopperplateGothic-Bold /CopperplateGothic-Light /Copperplate-ThirtyThreeBC /Corbel /Corbel-Bold /Corbel-BoldItalic /Corbel-Italic /CordiaNew /CordiaNew-Bold /CordiaNew-BoldItalic /CordiaNew-Italic /CordiaUPC /CordiaUPC-Bold /CordiaUPC-BoldItalic /CordiaUPC-Italic /Courier /Courier-Bold /Courier-BoldOblique /CourierNewPS-BoldItalicMT /CourierNewPS-BoldMT /CourierNewPS-ItalicMT /CourierNewPSMT /Courier-Oblique /CourierStd /CourierStd-Bold /CourierStd-BoldOblique /CourierStd-Oblique /CourierX-Bold /CourierX-BoldOblique /CourierX-Oblique /CourierX-Regular /CreepyRegular /CurlzMT /David-Bold /David-Reg /DavidTransparent /Dcb10 /Dcbx10 /Dcbxsl10 /Dcbxti10 /Dccsc10 /Dcitt10 /Dcr10 /Desdemona /DilleniaUPC /DilleniaUPCBold /DilleniaUPCBoldItalic /DilleniaUPCItalic /Dingbats /DomCasual /Dotum /DotumChe /DoulosSIL /EdwardianScriptITC /Elephant-Italic /Elephant-Regular /EngraversGothicBT-Regular /EngraversMT /EraserDust /ErasITC-Bold /ErasITC-Demi /ErasITC-Light /ErasITC-Medium /ErieBlackPSMT /ErieLightPSMT /EriePSMT /EstrangeloEdessa /Euclid /Euclid-Bold /Euclid-BoldItalic /EuclidExtra /EuclidExtra-Bold /EuclidFraktur /EuclidFraktur-Bold /Euclid-Italic /EuclidMathOne /EuclidMathOne-Bold /EuclidMathTwo /EuclidMathTwo-Bold /EuclidSymbol /EuclidSymbol-Bold /EuclidSymbol-BoldItalic /EuclidSymbol-Italic /EucrosiaUPC /EucrosiaUPCBold /EucrosiaUPCBoldItalic /EucrosiaUPCItalic /EUEX10 /EUEX7 /EUEX8 /EUEX9 /EUFB10 /EUFB5 /EUFB7 /EUFM10 /EUFM5 /EUFM7 /EURB10 /EURB5 /EURB7 /EURM10 /EURM5 /EURM7 /EuroMono-Bold /EuroMono-BoldItalic /EuroMono-Italic /EuroMono-Regular /EuroSans-Bold /EuroSans-BoldItalic /EuroSans-Italic /EuroSans-Regular /EuroSerif-Bold /EuroSerif-BoldItalic /EuroSerif-Italic /EuroSerif-Regular /EUSB10 /EUSB5 /EUSB7 /EUSM10 /EUSM5 /EUSM7 /FelixTitlingMT/Fences /FencesPlain /FigaroMT /FixedMiriamTransparent /FootlightMTLight /Formata-Italic /Formata-Medium /Formata-MediumItalic /Formata-Regular /ForteMT /FranklinGothic-Book /FranklinGothic-BookItalic /FranklinGothic-Demi /FranklinGothic-DemiCond /FranklinGothic-DemiItalic /FranklinGothic-Heavy /FranklinGothic-HeavyItalic /FranklinGothicITCbyBT-Book /FranklinGothicITCbyBT-BookItal /FranklinGothicITCbyBT-Demi /FranklinGothicITCbyBT-DemiItal /FranklinGothic-Medium /FranklinGothic-MediumCond /FranklinGothic-MediumItalic /FrankRuehl /FreesiaUPC /FreesiaUPCBold /FreesiaUPCBoldItalic /FreesiaUPCItalic /FreestyleScript-Regular /FrenchScriptMT /Frutiger-Black /Frutiger-BlackCn /Frutiger-BlackItalic /Frutiger-Bold /Frutiger-BoldCn /Frutiger-BoldItalic /Frutiger-Cn /Frutiger-ExtraBlackCn /Frutiger-Italic /Frutiger-Light /Frutiger-LightCn /Frutiger-LightItalic /Frutiger-Roman /Frutiger-UltraBlack /Futura-Bold /Futura-BoldOblique /Futura-Book /Futura-BookOblique /FuturaBT-Bold /FuturaBT-BoldItalic /FuturaBT-Book /FuturaBT-BookItalic /FuturaBT-Medium /FuturaBT-MediumItalic /Futura-Light /Futura-LightOblique /GalliardITCbyBT-Bold /GalliardITCbyBT-BoldItalic /GalliardITCbyBT-Italic /GalliardITCbyBT-Roman /Garamond /Garamond-Bold /Garamond-BoldCondensed /Garamond-BoldCondensedItalic /Garamond-BoldItalic /Garamond-BookCondensed /Garamond-BookCondensedItalic /Garamond-Italic /Garamond-LightCondensed /Garamond-LightCondensedItalic /Gautami /GeometricSlab703BT-Light /GeometricSlab703BT-LightItalic /Georgia /Georgia-Bold /Georgia-BoldItalic /Georgia-Italic /GeorgiaRef /Giddyup /Giddyup-Thangs /Gigi-Regular /GillSans /GillSans-Bold /GillSans-BoldItalic /GillSans-Condensed /GillSans-CondensedBold /GillSans-Italic /GillSans-Light /GillSans-LightItalic /GillSansMT /GillSansMT-Bold /GillSansMT-BoldItalic /GillSansMT-Condensed /GillSansMT-ExtraCondensedBold /GillSansMT-Italic /GillSans-UltraBold /GillSans-UltraBoldCondensed /GloucesterMT-ExtraCondensed /Gothic-Thirteen /GoudyOldStyleBT-Bold /GoudyOldStyleBT-BoldItalic /GoudyOldStyleBT-Italic /GoudyOldStyleBT-Roman /GoudyOldStyleT-Bold /GoudyOldStyleT-Italic /GoudyOldStyleT-Regular /GoudyStout /GoudyTextMT-LombardicCapitals /GSIDefaultSymbols /Gulim /GulimChe /Gungsuh /GungsuhChe /Haettenschweiler /HarlowSolid /Harrington /Helvetica /Helvetica-Black /Helvetica-BlackOblique /Helvetica-Bold /Helvetica-BoldOblique /Helvetica-Condensed /Helvetica-Condensed-Black /Helvetica-Condensed-BlackObl /Helvetica-Condensed-Bold /Helvetica-Condensed-BoldObl /Helvetica-Condensed-Light /Helvetica-Condensed-LightObl /Helvetica-Condensed-Oblique /Helvetica-Fraction /Helvetica-Narrow /Helvetica-Narrow-Bold /Helvetica-Narrow-BoldOblique /Helvetica-Narrow-Oblique /Helvetica-Oblique /HighTowerText-Italic /HighTowerText-Reg /Humanist521BT-BoldCondensed /Humanist521BT-Light /Humanist521BT-LightItalic /Humanist521BT-RomanCondensed /Imago-ExtraBold /Impact /ImprintMT-Shadow /InformalRoman-Regular /IrisUPC /IrisUPCBold /IrisUPCBoldItalic /IrisUPCItalic /Ironwood /ItcEras-Medium /ItcKabel-Bold /ItcKabel-Book /ItcKabel-Demi /ItcKabel-Medium /ItcKabel-Ultra /JasmineUPC /JasmineUPC-Bold /JasmineUPC-BoldItalic /JasmineUPC-Italic /JoannaMT /JoannaMT-Italic /Jokerman-Regular /JuiceITC-Regular /Kartika /Kaufmann /KaufmannBT-Bold /KaufmannBT-Regular /KidTYPEPaint /KinoMT /KodchiangUPC /KodchiangUPC-Bold /KodchiangUPC-BoldItalic /KodchiangUPC-Italic /KorinnaITCbyBT-Regular /KristenITC-Regular /KrutiDev040Bold /KrutiDev040BoldItalic /KrutiDev040Condensed /KrutiDev040Italic /KrutiDev040Thin /KrutiDev040Wide /KrutiDev060 /KrutiDev060Bold /KrutiDev060BoldItalic /KrutiDev060Condensed /KrutiDev060Italic /KrutiDev060Thin /KrutiDev060Wide /KrutiDev070 /KrutiDev070Condensed /KrutiDev070Italic /KrutiDev070Thin /KrutiDev070Wide /KrutiDev080 /KrutiDev080Condensed /KrutiDev080Italic /KrutiDev080Wide /KrutiDev090 /KrutiDev090Bold /KrutiDev090BoldItalic /KrutiDev090Condensed /KrutiDev090Italic /KrutiDev090Thin /KrutiDev090Wide /KrutiDev100 /KrutiDev100Bold /KrutiDev100BoldItalic /KrutiDev100Condensed /KrutiDev100Italic /KrutiDev100Thin /KrutiDev100Wide /KrutiDev120 /KrutiDev120Condensed /KrutiDev120Thin /KrutiDev120Wide /KrutiDev130 /KrutiDev130Condensed /KrutiDev130Thin /KrutiDev130Wide /KunstlerScript /Latha /LatinWide /LetterGothic /LetterGothic-Bold /LetterGothic-BoldOblique /LetterGothic-BoldSlanted /LetterGothicMT /LetterGothicMT-Bold /LetterGothicMT-BoldOblique /LetterGothicMT-Oblique /LetterGothic-Slanted /LevenimMT /LevenimMTBold /LilyUPC /LilyUPCBold /LilyUPCBoldItalic /LilyUPCItalic /Lithos-Black /Lithos-Regular /LotusWPBox-Roman /LotusWPIcon-Roman /LotusWPIntA-Roman /LotusWPIntB-Roman /LotusWPType-Roman /LucidaBright /LucidaBright-Demi /LucidaBright-DemiItalic /LucidaBright-Italic /LucidaCalligraphy-Italic /LucidaConsole /LucidaFax /LucidaFax-Demi /LucidaFax-DemiItalic /LucidaFax-Italic /LucidaHandwriting-Italic /LucidaSans /LucidaSans-Demi /LucidaSans-DemiItalic /LucidaSans-Italic /LucidaSans-Typewriter /LucidaSans-TypewriterBold /LucidaSans-TypewriterBoldOblique /LucidaSans-TypewriterOblique /LucidaSansUnicode /Lydian /Magneto-Bold /MaiandraGD-Regular /Mangal-Regular /Map-Symbols /MathA /MathB /MathC /Mathematica1 /Mathematica1-Bold /Mathematica1Mono /Mathematica1Mono-Bold /Mathematica2 /Mathematica2-Bold /Mathematica2Mono /Mathematica2Mono-Bold /Mathematica3 /Mathematica3-Bold /Mathematica3Mono /Mathematica3Mono-Bold /Mathematica4 /Mathematica4-Bold /Mathematica4Mono /Mathematica4Mono-Bold /Mathematica5 /Mathematica5-Bold /Mathematica5Mono /Mathematica5Mono-Bold /Mathematica6 /Mathematica6Bold /Mathematica6Mono /Mathematica6MonoBold /Mathematica7 /Mathematica7Bold /Mathematica7Mono /Mathematica7MonoBold /MatisseITC-Regular /MaturaMTScriptCapitals /Mesquite /Mezz-Black /Mezz-Regular /MICR /MicrosoftSansSerif /MingLiU /Minion-BoldCondensed /Minion-BoldCondensedItalic /Minion-Condensed /Minion-CondensedItalic /Minion-Ornaments /MinionPro-Bold /MinionPro-BoldIt /MinionPro-It /MinionPro-Regular /Miriam /MiriamFixed /MiriamTransparent /Mistral /Modern-Regular /MonotypeCorsiva /MonotypeSorts /MSAM10 /MSAM5 /MSAM6 /MSAM7 /MSAM8 /MSAM9 /MSBM10 /MSBM5 /MSBM6 /MSBM7 /MSBM8 /MSBM9 /MS-Gothic /MSHei /MSLineDrawPSMT /MS-Mincho /MSOutlook /MS-PGothic /MS-PMincho /MSReference1 /MSReference2 /MSReferenceSansSerif /MSReferenceSansSerif-Bold /MSReferenceSansSerif-BoldItalic /MSReferenceSansSerif-Italic /MSReferenceSerif /MSReferenceSerif-Bold /MSReferenceSerif-BoldItalic /MSReferenceSerif-Italic /MSReferenceSpecialty /MSSong /MS-UIGothic /MT-Extra /MTExtraTiger /MT-Symbol /MT-Symbol-Italic /MVBoli /Myriad-Bold/Myriad-BoldItalic /Myriad-Italic /Myriad-Roman /Narkisim /NewCenturySchlbk-Bold /NewCenturySchlbk-BoldItalic /NewCenturySchlbk-Italic /NewCenturySchlbk-Roman /NewMilleniumSchlbk-BoldItalicSH /NewsGothic /NewsGothic-Bold /NewsGothicBT-Bold /NewsGothicBT-BoldItalic /NewsGothicBT-Italic /NewsGothicBT-Roman /NewsGothic-Condensed /NewsGothic-Italic /NewsGothicMT /NewsGothicMT-Bold /NewsGothicMT-Italic /NiagaraEngraved-Reg /NiagaraSolid-Reg /NimbusMonL-Bold /NimbusMonL-BoldObli /NimbusMonL-Regu /NimbusMonL-ReguObli /NimbusRomNo9L-Medi /NimbusRomNo9L-MediItal /NimbusRomNo9L-Regu /NimbusRomNo9L-ReguItal /NimbusSanL-Bold /NimbusSanL-BoldCond /NimbusSanL-BoldCondItal /NimbusSanL-BoldItal /NimbusSanL-Regu /NimbusSanL-ReguCond /NimbusSanL-ReguCondItal /NimbusSanL-ReguItal /Nimrod /Nimrod-Bold /Nimrod-BoldItalic /Nimrod-Italic /NSimSun /Nueva-BoldExtended /Nueva-BoldExtendedItalic /Nueva-Italic /Nueva-Roman /NuptialScript /OCRA /OCRA-Alternate /OCRAExtended /OCRB /OCRB-Alternate /OfficinaSans-Bold /OfficinaSans-BoldItalic /OfficinaSans-Book /OfficinaSans-BookItalic /OfficinaSerif-Bold /OfficinaSerif-BoldItalic /OfficinaSerif-Book /OfficinaSerif-BookItalic /OldEnglishTextMT /Onyx /OnyxBT-Regular /OzHandicraftBT-Roman /PalaceScriptMT /Palatino-Bold /Palatino-BoldItalic /Palatino-Italic /PalatinoLinotype-Bold /PalatinoLinotype-BoldItalic /PalatinoLinotype-Italic /PalatinoLinotype-Roman /Palatino-Roman /PapyrusPlain /Papyrus-Regular /Parchment-Regular /Parisian /ParkAvenue /Penumbra-SemiboldFlare /Penumbra-SemiboldSans /Penumbra-SemiboldSerif /PepitaMT /Perpetua /Perpetua-Bold /Perpetua-BoldItalic /Perpetua-Italic /PerpetuaTitlingMT-Bold /PerpetuaTitlingMT-Light /PhotinaCasualBlack /Playbill /PMingLiU /Poetica-SuppOrnaments /PoorRichard-Regular /PopplLaudatio-Italic /PopplLaudatio-Medium /PopplLaudatio-MediumItalic /PopplLaudatio-Regular /PrestigeElite /Pristina-Regular /PTBarnumBT-Regular /Raavi /RageItalic /Ravie /RefSpecialty /Ribbon131BT-Bold /Rockwell /Rockwell-Bold /Rockwell-BoldItalic /Rockwell-Condensed /Rockwell-CondensedBold /Rockwell-ExtraBold /Rockwell-Italic /Rockwell-Light /Rockwell-LightItalic /Rod /RodTransparent /RunicMT-Condensed /Sanvito-Light /Sanvito-Roman /ScriptC /ScriptMTBold /SegoeUI /SegoeUI-Bold /SegoeUI-BoldItalic /SegoeUI-Italic /Serpentine-BoldOblique /ShelleyVolanteBT-Regular /ShowcardGothic-Reg /Shruti /SILDoulosIPA /SimHei /SimSun /SimSun-PUA /SnapITC-Regular /StandardSymL /Stencil /StoneSans /StoneSans-Bold /StoneSans-BoldItalic /StoneSans-Italic /StoneSans-Semibold /StoneSans-SemiboldItalic /Stop /Swiss721BT-BlackExtended /Sylfaen /Symbol /SymbolMT /SymbolTiger /SymbolTigerExpert /Tahoma /Tahoma-Bold /Tci1 /Tci1Bold /Tci1BoldItalic /Tci1Italic /Tci2 /Tci2Bold /Tci2BoldItalic /Tci2Italic /Tci3 /Tci3Bold /Tci3BoldItalic /Tci3Italic /Tci4 /Tci4Bold /Tci4BoldItalic /Tci4Italic /TechnicalItalic /TechnicalPlain /Tekton /Tekton-Bold /TektonMM /Tempo-HeavyCondensed /Tempo-HeavyCondensedItalic /TempusSansITC /Tiger /TigerExpert /Times-Bold /Times-BoldItalic /Times-BoldItalicOsF /Times-BoldSC /Times-ExtraBold /Times-Italic /Times-ItalicOsF /TimesNewRomanMT-ExtraBold /TimesNewRomanPS-BoldItalicMT /TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT /TimesNewRomanPS-ItalicMT /TimesNewRomanPSMT /Times-Roman /Times-RomanSC /Trajan-Bold /Trebuchet-BoldItalic /TrebuchetMS /TrebuchetMS-Bold /TrebuchetMS-Italic /Tunga-Regular /TwCenMT-Bold /TwCenMT-BoldItalic /TwCenMT-Condensed /TwCenMT-CondensedBold /TwCenMT-CondensedExtraBold /TwCenMT-CondensedMedium /TwCenMT-Italic /TwCenMT-Regular /Univers-Bold /Univers-BoldItalic /UniversCondensed-Bold /UniversCondensed-BoldItalic /UniversCondensed-Medium /UniversCondensed-MediumItalic /Univers-Medium /Univers-MediumItalic /URWBookmanL-DemiBold /URWBookmanL-DemiBoldItal /URWBookmanL-Ligh /URWBookmanL-LighItal /URWChanceryL-MediItal /URWGothicL-Book /URWGothicL-BookObli /URWGothicL-Demi /URWGothicL-DemiObli /URWPalladioL-Bold /URWPalladioL-BoldItal /URWPalladioL-Ital /URWPalladioL-Roma /USPSBarCode /VAGRounded-Black /VAGRounded-Bold /VAGRounded-Light /VAGRounded-Thin /Verdana /Verdana-Bold /Verdana-BoldItalic /Verdana-Italic /VerdanaRef /VinerHandITC /Viva-BoldExtraExtended /Vivaldii /Viva-LightCondensed /Viva-Regular /VladimirScript /Vrinda /Webdings /Westminster /Willow /Wingdings2 /Wingdings3 /Wingdings-Regular /WNCYB10 /WNCYI10 /WNCYR10 /WNCYSC10 /WNCYSS10 /WoodtypeOrnaments-One /WoodtypeOrnaments-Two /WP-ArabicScriptSihafa /WP-ArabicSihafa /WP-BoxDrawing /WP-CyrillicA /WP-CyrillicB /WP-GreekCentury /WP-GreekCourier /WP-GreekHelve /WP-HebrewDavid /WP-IconicSymbolsA /WP-IconicSymbolsB /WP-Japanese /WP-MathA /WP-MathB /WP-MathExtendedA /WP-MathExtendedB /WP-MultinationalAHelve /WP-MultinationalARoman /WP-MultinationalBCourier /WP-MultinationalBHelve /WP-MultinationalBRoman /WP-MultinationalCourier /WP-Phonetic /WPTypographicSymbols /XYATIP10 /XYBSQL10 /XYBTIP10 /XYCIRC10 /XYCMAT10 /XYCMBT10 /XYDASH10 /XYEUAT10 /XYEUBT10 /ZapfChancery-MediumItalic /ZapfDingbats /ZapfHumanist601BT-Bold /ZapfHumanist601BT-BoldItalic /ZapfHumanist601BT-Demi /ZapfHumanist601BT-DemiItalic /ZapfHumanist601BT-Italic /ZapfHumanist601BT-Roman /ZWAdobeF ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 150 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 2.00333 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict > /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 2.00333 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy/OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 600 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.00167 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /Description /CHS /CHT /CZE /DAN /DEU /ESP /FRA /GRE/HEB /HRV (Za stvaranje Adobe PDF dokumenata pogodnih za pouzdani prikaz i ispis poslovnih dokumenata koristite ove postavke. Stvoreni PDF dokumenti mogu se otvoriti Acrobat i Adobe Reader 5.0 i kasnijim verzijama.) /HUN /ITA (Utilizzare queste impostazioni per creare documenti Adobe PDF adatti per visualizzare e stampare documenti aziendali in modo affidabile. I documenti PDF creati possono essere aperti con Acrobat e Adobe Reader 5.0 e versioni successive.) /JPN /KOR /NLD (Gebruik deze instellingen om Adobe PDF-documenten te maken waarmee zakelijke documenten betrouwbaar kunnen worden weergegeven en afgedrukt. De gemaakte PDF-documenten kunnen worden geopend met Acrobat en Adobe Reader 5.0 en hoger.) /NOR /POL /PTB /RUM /RUS