Baixe o app para aproveitar ainda mais
Prévia do material em texto
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tejs20 European Journal of Sport Science ISSN: 1746-1391 (Print) 1536-7290 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tejs20 Caffeine improves muscular performance in elite Brazilian Jiu-jitsu athletes Francisco Javier Diaz-Lara, Juan Del Coso, Jose Manuel García, Luis J. Portillo, Francisco Areces & Javier Abián-Vicén To cite this article: Francisco Javier Diaz-Lara, Juan Del Coso, Jose Manuel García, Luis J. Portillo, Francisco Areces & Javier Abián-Vicén (2016) Caffeine improves muscular performance in elite Brazilian Jiu-jitsu athletes, European Journal of Sport Science, 16:8, 1079-1086, DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036 Published online: 10 Feb 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1100 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tejs20 http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tejs20 http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036 https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036 http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tejs20&show=instructions http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tejs20&show=instructions http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2016-02-10 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2016-02-10 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036#tabModule http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036#tabModule ORIGINAL ARTICLE Caffeine improves muscular performance in elite Brazilian Jiu-jitsu athletes FRANCISCO JAVIER DIAZ-LARA1, JUAN DEL COSO2, JOSE MANUEL GARCÍA1, LUIS J. PORTILLO1, FRANCISCO ARECES2, & JAVIER ABIÁN-VICÉN3 1Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport Training Laboratory, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain; 2Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Sport Science Institute, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain & 3Faculty of Sport Sciences, Performance and Sport Rehabilitation Laboratory, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain Abstract Scientific information about the effects of caffeine intake on combat sport performance is scarce and controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of caffeine to improve Brazilian Jiu-jitsu (BJJ)-specific muscular performance. Fourteen male and elite BJJ athletes (29.2 ± 3.3 years; 71.3 ± 9.1 kg) participated in a randomized double-blind, placebo- controlled and crossover experiment. In two different sessions, BJJ athletes ingested 3 mg kg−1 of caffeine or a placebo. After 60 min, they performed a handgrip maximal force test, a countermovement jump, a maximal static lift test and bench-press tests consisting of one-repetition maximum, power-load, and repetitions to failure. In comparison to the placebo, the ingestion of the caffeine increased: hand grip force in both hands (50.9 ± 2.9 vs. 53.3 ± 3.1 kg; respectively p < .05), countermovement jump height (40.6 ± 2.6 vs. 41.7 ± 3.1 cm; p= .02), and time recorded in the maximal static lift test (54.4 ± 13.4 vs. 59.2 ± 11.9 s; p< .01).The caffeine also increased the one-repetition maximum (90.5 ± 7.7 vs. 93.3 ± 7.5 kg; p = .02), maximal power obtained during the power-load test (750.5 ± 154.7 vs. 826.9 ± 163.7W; p< .01) and mean power during the bench-press exercise test to failure (280.2 ± 52.5 vs. 312.2 ± 78.3W; p= .04). In conclusion, the pre-exercise ingestion of 3 mg kg−1 of caffeine increased dynamic and isometric muscular force, power, and endurance strength in elite BJJ athletes. Thus, caffeine might be an effective ergogenic aid to improve physical performance in BJJ. Keywords: Testing; strength; fatigue Introduction Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) is one of the most consumed substances worldwide despite the fact that it has no nutritional value and is not essential for any biological function. As in society in general, caffeine is also one of the most used drugs in sport (Del Coso, Munoz, & Munoz-Guerra, 2011). Although caffeine has been found effective to improve endur- ance exercise in a myriad of investigations (Ganio, Klau, Casa, Armstrong, & Maresh, 2009), its ergo- genic effect on the different manifestations of muscu- lar force is controversial. Some investigations do not support the use of caffeine (2–6 mg kg−1) as an ergo- genic aid in maximal dynamic contractions (Astor- ino, Rohmann, & Firth, 2008; Eckerson et al., 2013). However other researchers with similar doses of caffeine have found that this substance sig- nificantly increased short-duration maximal dynamic force (Bazzucchi, Felici, Montini, Figura, & Sacchetti, 2011; Del Coso, Salinero, Gonzalez- Millan, Abian-Vicen, & Perez-Gonzalez, 2012; Gold- stein, Jacobs, Whitehurst, Penhollow, & Antonio, 2010; Pallares et al., 2013). Furthermore, the scienti- fic information about the effects of caffeine to enhance muscular endurance is also disputed (Astor- ino et al., 2008; Duncan, Stanley, Parkhouse, Cook, & Smith, 2013; Eckerson et al., 2013; Forbes, Candow, Little, Magnus, & Chilibeck, 2007). The use of different caffeine doses, performance tests, and variations in the training status of the individuals under investigation have made it difficult to conclude whether caffeine can be considered as an ergogenic © 2016 European College of Sport Science Correspondence: Javier Abián-Vicén, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Performance and Sport Rehabilitation Laboratory, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Carlos III s/n, Toledo 45071, Spain. E-mail: javier.abian@uclm.es European Journal of Sport Science, 2016 Vol. 16, No. 8, 1079–1086, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1143036 mailto:javier.abian@uclm.es http://www.tandfonline.com substance for sports based on force, power, and mus- cular endurance. Brazilian Jiu-jitsu (BJJ), judo, and wrestling are the most popular grappling sports and they share similar physical and physiological characteristics. Briefly, they are characterized by intermittent efforts in which maximal isometric and dynamic muscle con- tractions are interspersed with short periods of rest, and/or lower-intensity efforts (Franchini, Artioli, & Brito, 2013; Garcia-Pallares, Lopez-Gullon, Muriel, Diaz, & Izquierdo, 2011). Due to the importance of force for BJJ performance, the values obtained in maximal strength, power, and muscular endurance are significantly different between elite and non- elite BJJ athletes (Diaz-Lara, García, Monteiro, & Abian-Vicen, 2014; da Silva, Marocolo, De Moura Simin, Rezende, & Mota, 2012; da Silva, Simim, Marocolo, Franchini, & da Mota, 2014). The use of caffeine to increase BJJ-specific manifestations of muscle performance can represent an effective aid for elite BJJ athletes due to the mechanisms related to the ergogenicity of this stimulant. First, caffeine might act antagonistically on adenosine receptors, thus inhibiting the negative effects of adenosine on neural drive (Davis & Green, 2009). For this reason, pre-exercise caffeine intake has been related to improved voluntary contraction and better intra- and inter-muscular coordination during muscle con- tractions (Del Coso et al., 2012). Besides, caffeine has been also associated to hypoalgesic effects that results in dampened pain perception, effects that could improve overall performance in several combat sports (Davis & Green, 2009). However, to the authors’ knowledge, there is little scientific infor- mation on the use of caffeine in combat sports and there is no specific research related to caffeine and BJJ. The main purpose of the present investigation was to determinethe effectiveness of caffeine (3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass) to improve muscular performance in BJJ. We hypothesized that the pre- exercise ingestion of caffeine will improve dynamic and isometric force, muscle power, and endurance strength in elite BJJ athletes. Methods Subjects Fourteen male and elite BJJ athletes (age: 29.2 ± 3.3 years, height: 173.8 ± 6.2 cm, body mass: 71.3 ± 9.1 kg, body fat: 7.5 ± 1.5%, and body muscle mass: 50.6 ± 3.3%) volunteered to participate in this inves- tigation. All the participants were categorized as elite because they had won the National championship in Spain in their respective weight-categories or had ranked among the first three classified in an international championship organized by the BJJ international federation (IBJJF) during the year of the study. All participants had prior BJJ experience of a least five years and had trained a minimum of 2 hours·day−1, 6 days·week−1 during the previous year (competitive season). The participants were light caffeine consumers (<60 mg per day, ∼1 cup of coffee per day maximum). Participants were fully informed of any risks and discomforts associated with the experiments before giving their informed written consent to participate. The study was approved by the Camilo José Cela University Review Board in accordance with the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki. Experimental design A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, and crossover experimental design was used in this study. Each athlete took part in two experimental trials at the same time of day and under laboratory-controlled conditions (21.4 ± 0.5°C dry temperature; 30.5 ± 5.5% relative humidity). Experimental trials were separated by one week to allow complete recovery and caffeine washout. In each experimental trial, ath- letes ingested a capsule with an individualized dose of 3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass (99% pure, Bulkpowders, UK) or an identical capsule filled with cellulose (e.g. 0 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass; placebo). This dosage was selected based on previous investigations in which the pre-exercise intake of 3 mg kg−1 of caffeine have significantly improved several aspects of physical performance in individual and team sports while the side-effects were minimal (Abian et al., 2015; Del Coso et al., 2013, 2014). The order of the experimental trials was randomized and counterbalanced. Experimental protocol The day before the first experimental trial, partici- pants were nude-weighed (Radwag, Poland) to indi- vidualize the caffeine dosage. On this day, the anthropometric characteristics were measured by an ISAK certified anthropometrist (Marfell-Jones, Olds, Stewart, & Carter, 2006). Body fat was calcu- lated from six skinfold measurements (triceps, sub- scapular, umbilicus, suprailium, thigh, and lower leg) according to the equations proposed by Carter (1982). Body muscle mass was calculated by sub- tracting fat mass (Carter, 1982), bone mass (Rocha, 1975), and residual mass (Würch, 1974) from total body mass. The day before each experimental trial, participants refrained from strenuous exercise and adopted a similar diet and fluid intake regimen, 1080 F. J. Diaz-Lara et al. replicating their pre-competition routines. Partici- pants were encouraged to withdraw from all dietary sources of caffeine (coffee, cola drinks, etc.) and alcohol for 48 hours before testing. The day of the experimental trials, participants had a pre-compe- tition meal (three hours before the onset of the trial) and 500 mL of water (two hours before the onset of the trial). The compliance of pre-experimental pro- cedures was verified by self-reported diet and exercise questionnaires and the procedures were replicated before the second experimental trial. The experimental trials were carried out in the facili- ties for grappling sports belonging to the Spanish High Council for Sport. Participants arrived 75 minutes before the beginning of the experimental trial and they took the capsule assigned for the trial with 250 mL of water. Then, they performed a standardized warm-up that included 10 min of low-intensity running, light- intensity activities involving the muscles to be tested and 10 min of arm extensions in bench press with sub- maximal loads. Sixty minutes after the ingestion of the capsule, the athletes performed five different tests with 10 min rest between the first 4 and 45 min rest before the last test to obtain a complete recovery. The tests were performed as follows: Handgrip maximal force production: This test was performed for both hands and was measured by means of a handgrip dynamometer (Grip-D, Takei, Japan) with a sensitivity of 1 N (Del Coso et al., 2014). High test–retest reliability (Pearson’s r= 0.96– 0.98) and low systematic error (0.02 kg) have been reported of handgrip strength in previous studies (Espana-Romero et al., 2010; Ruiz et al., 2006). Ath- letes performed two attempts with each hand and with 1 min rest between repetitions. The maximal value for each hand was used for statistical analysis. Countermovement jump (CMJ): Participants performed a maximal countermovement jump on a force platform (Quattro Jump, Kistler, Switzerland) with a sampling frequency of 500 Hz and a sensitivity of 1 N. CMJ has been reported as a high reliable test with a coefficient of variation of ∼2.4% and an intra- class correlation coefficient of .93 (Moir, Button, Glaister, & Stone, 2004). Athletes performed two attempts with 1 min recovery between repetitions (Del Coso et al., 2013). The jump with the highest height was used for statistical analysis. Maximal static lift (MSL): This is a highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient = .97) and specific gripping endurance test in BJJ, and it is useful for differentiating among BJJ athletes from different levels (da Silva et al., 2012). For this measurement, we followed the protocol described by da Silva et al. (2012): participants performed two sets of grip exercises holding on to a gijacket rolled around an elevated bar (2.5 m from the floor), with the elbow joint maintained at 90°, with a pronated grip and with minimal hip and knee flexion during the whole test. BJJ athletes were required to maintain this body position during the maximal possible while the test finished when participants were unable to maintain the elbow joint at 90°, confirmed by using a analogic goniometer. The execution with the longer time of grip was used for analysis. A rest period of 5 min was established between repetitions. Power-load and one-repetition maximum (1RM) tests: Then, participants performed a power-load test in a bench-press exercise with increasing loads until they reached their 1RM, according to the methods described by Brown and Weir (2001). The initial load was set at 20 kg for all subjects and was progressively increased with 10 kg increments until the mean propulsive velocity during the concentric phase of the muscle contrac- tion was lower than 0.4 m/s. Thereafter, load was adjusted with smaller increments (5, 2.5, and 1 kg, respectively) until participants reached their 1RM. The 1RM was considered valid when the mean pro- pulsive velocity during the execution was lower than 0.2 m/s and participants were unable to perform the following load. Ritti-Dias, Avelar, Salvador, and Cyrino (2011) reported high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = .94–.96) of this test. During each repetition, velocity (in m·s−1), acceleration (in m·s−2), and muscle power (in W) were recorded at 1000 Hz by linking a rotatory encoder (Isocontrol 5.0, Spain) to the end of the bar. After this test, each load was relativized by individualized 1RM values and grouped by clusters as %1RM. Bench-press repetitions to failure: After 45 min of recovery, participants performed a test con- sisting of bench-press repetitions to volitional fatigue with the load at which they had obtained their maximal power production in the power-load test (45.1 ± 12.9% of 1RM). On a verbal command, participantsperformed a concentric arm extension as fast as possible, with no bouncing or arching of the back permitted. The test continued until failure and velocity (in m·s−1), acceleration (in m·s−2), and muscle power (inW) were recorded by the same rota- tory encoder used for the power-load test. For the analysis, we used the total number of repetitions to volitional fatigue and the first-15 repetitions, which was the minimum number of repetitions performed by all the participants. Side effects evaluation: After ending the per- formance measurements, participants were required to fill out a questionnaire about their sensations of muscle power, endurance, and perceived exertion during the tests. This questionnaire included a 1–10 point scale to assess each item and it has been pre- viously used with similar purposes in previous Caffeine and Brazilian Jiu-jitsu performance 1081 investigations with caffeinated energy drinks (Del Coso et al., 2012; Salinero et al., 2014). In addition, participants were provided with a survey to be filled out the following morning about sleep quality, ner- vousness, gastrointestinal problems, and other dis- comforts associated to the ingestion of caffeine. This survey included seven items on a yes/no scale and has been previously used to assess side effects derived from caffeine capsules (Del Coso et al., 2012; Salinero et al., 2014). Statistical analysis The results of each test were blindly introduced into the statistical package SPSS v 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and subsequently analysed. The normality of each variable was initially tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test. All the continuous variables included in this research presented a normal distri- bution (p > .05). To establish differences between the caffeine trial and the placebo trial, Student’s t- test for dependent samples was used for the variables measured once during each experiment (CMJ, MSL, etc). For the variables measured several times in the same test (power-load test, bench press repetitions to failure, etc), the difference between trials was identified with an analysis of variance (ANOVA; treatment × repetition). For this statistical procedure, the differences were considered statistically signifi- cant after a significant F test and with the use of the Bonferroni post hoc procedure. The differences between treatments in the 1-to-10-point scale used for the self-reported feelings of muscle power, endur- ance, and perceived exertion were identified by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The McNemar test was also used to detect differences in the prevalence of side effects after the intake of caffeine and the placebo capsules. The effect size was calculated in all pairwise comparisons according to the formula proposed by Glass, McGaw, and Smith (1981). The magnitude of the effect size was interpreted using Cohen’s scale (Cohen, 1988). The significance level for all statistical tests was set at p< .05. Results Handgrip maximal force, CMJ and MSL tests In comparison to the placebo, the pre-exercise inges- tion of caffeine enhanced maximal force production during the handgrip test in the dominant hand by 4.4 ± 6.3% (95% CI: 0.3–4.5 kg), and in the non- dominant hand by 4.9 ± 7.3% (95% CI: 0.4–4.0 kg; Table I). In the CMJ, caffeine increased jump height by 3.7 ± 3.7% (95% CI: 0.1–2.1 cm) and velocity at peak power by 1.3 ± 2.2% (95% CI: 0.01–0.06 m s−1) although there were no differences in the values of force applied at peak power (Table I). The ingestion of caffeine increased time recorded in MSL test by 10.4 ± 7.3% (95% CI: 2.8–10.9 s). 1RM and power-load in bench press exercise In comparison to the placebo, the ingestion of caf- feine increased 1RM in the bench press by 3.0 ± 2.4% (95% CI: 0.5–5.0 kg), the maximal power output by 10.5 ± 6.0% (95% CI: 33.9–119.0 W), mean power by 7.2 ± 5.0% (95% CI: 7.9–51.9 W), and maximal velocity by 5.6 ± 4.7% (95% CI: 0.01– 0.13 m/s; Table I). Caffeine also moved the power- load curve upwards although the differences with the placebo were only significant at 25%, 43%, and 68% of 1RM (F = 16.4, p < .05; Figure 1). Bench-press repetitions to failure In comparison to the placebo, the ingestion of caf- feine improved the number of bench-press rep- etitions to volitional fatigue (21.8 ± 8.1 vs. 25.0 ± 8.7 rep, p= .04, 95% CI: 0.2–6.0 rep, d= 0.4). More- over, caffeine increased average muscle power pro- duction during the whole test (280.2 ± 52.5 vs. 312.2 ± 78.3 W, p = .04, 95% CI: 0.6–63.3 W, d= 0.6). If we consider the first 15 repetitions (minimum of repetitions performed by all partici- pants), caffeine improved average muscle power in comparison to the ingestion of a placebo (335.1 ± 48.6 vs. 385.6 ± 36.5 W, p < .001, 95% CI: 39.0– 61.9 W, d= 1.0) and it moved the power-repetitions curve upwards with significant differences between trials in almost all repetitions (1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 15; F= 8.8, p < .05; Figure 2). Frequency of the side effects derived from caffeine Typical side effects associated to caffeine intake were similar in the caffeine and placebo trials (Table II). However, the ingestion of caffeine improved their rates of muscle power sensation (5.2 ± 1.5 vs. 5.9 ± 1.2 points, p= .05) and increased the rate of fatigue sensation (6.2 ± 1.2 vs. 6.5 ± 1.8 points, p = .02). Finally, muscular endurance sensations were rated similarly in both experimental trials (5.9 ± 1.0 vs. 5.9 ± 0.4 points, p = .50). Discussion One of the novelties of the present investigation is the assessment, for the first time, of the effects of caffeine 1082 F. J. Diaz-Lara et al. on the physical performance of elite BJJ athletes. Based upon previous scientific information about the physical demands of BJJ (Diaz-Lara et al., 2014; da Silva et al., 2012; da Silva et al., 2014), we defined the most significant variables of muscular performance in elite BJJ and designed an experiment that included the measurement of several BJJ-specific manifestations of force and power. In the present investigation, results show that the pre-exercise inges- tion of caffeine (3 mg kg−1) increased maximal iso- metric (e.g. handgrip) and dynamic (e.g. 1RM) force production in the upper body. The ingestion of caffeine also increased maximal power output in the upper body (e.g. power-load test) and lower- body (e.g. CMJ) test. Furthermore, caffeine was effective to increase muscular endurance in isometric (e.g. maximal static lift) and dynamic (e.g. bench- press repetitions to failure) resistance exercise tests. On the other hand, the prevalence of side effects, such as activeness, muscle soreness, anxiety, and insomnia were similar after the ingestion of caffeine and the placebo. All this information suggests that caffeine might be an effective and safe ergogenic aid for elite BJJ athletes. The scientific information on the effectiveness of caffeine to improve performance in combat sports is very scarce and controversial. In judo, caffeine inges- tion (6 mg kg−1) did not increase performance in a judo-specific performance test (Lopes-Silva, Felippe, Silva-Cavalcante, Bertuzzi, & Lima-Silva, 2014). In wrestling, caffeine (5 mg kg−1) had a detri- mental effect on upper body intermittent sprint per- formance (e.g. crank-arm Wingate test) in trained wrestlers under simulated competition conditions (Aedma, Timpmann, & Oopik, 2013). However, in taekwondo, a recent study has suggested that caffeine ingestion (5 mg kg−1) can enhance performance in a specific task and it can be effective to delay fatigue during successive taekwondo combats (Santos et al., 2014). The inconsistencies in the main outcomes of these investigations, the differences in the test used to assess performance, and the discre- pancies in the physical requirements of these sport disciplines make it difficult to deduce whether caf- feine can be considered an ergogenic aid for combat sports. The present investigation includes the measure- ment of several manifestations of force to unequivo- cally determinethe ergogenic effect of caffeine in combat sports, with special reference to BJJ athletes. Our data indicate that the ingestion of caffeine (3 mg kg−1) increased maximal force production in a hand grip test with both hands (Table I), coinciding with Del Coso et al. (2014) who showed significant improvements in hand grip force in volleyball players with a similar dose of caffeine. The partici- pants in the current investigation also increased their maximal force production in the bench-press exercise (Table I). Del Coso et al. (2012) reported similar improvements in maximal power output in the lower (squat exercise) and upper (bench-press exercise) body with the same dose of caffeine (3 mg kg−1). Pallares et al. (2013) also found that doses of 3 mg kg−1 are enough to improve high-velocity muscle actions against low loads (25%–50% 1RM) in both upper and lower limbs. Finally, recent inves- tigations in various sports such as soccer, rugby, vol- leyball, and badminton that have used caffeinated energy drinks (3 mg kg−1) have obtained perform- ance improvements in leg muscle power output and height during different jumping tests (Abian et al., 2015; Del Coso et al., 2013, 2014). It seems evident that caffeine is an effective ergogenic aid to improve force- and power-based muscle contractions and because these actions are vital for success in combat sports (Diaz-Lara et al., 2014; Franchini et al., 2013; Garcia-Pallares et al., 2011; da Silva et al., 2014) we can infer that caffeine is an effective aid to improve upper and lower-body muscle power in BJJ and other comparable grappling sports. Table I. Handgrip force, time recorded in the maximum static lift test, countermovement jump (CMJ) variables, and force, power and velocity in a bench-press power-load test with the ingestion of caffeine (3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass) or a placebo Placebo Caffeine Δ (%) p-Value Effect size Dominant handgrip force (kg) 53.5 ± 3.2 55.9 ± 5.1 4.4 ± 6.3 .03 0.8 Non-dominant handgrip force (kg) 48.4 ± 5.2 50.7 ± 4.9 4.9 ± 7.3 .02 0.4 Maximum static lift (s) 54.4 ± 13.4 59.2 ± 11.9 10.4 ± 13.7 <.01 0.5 Jump height in the CMJ (cm) 40.6 ± 2.6 41.7 ± 3.1 3.7 ± 3.7 .02 0.2 Velocity at peak power in the CMJ (m s−1) 2.60 ± 0.13 2.64 ± 0.13 1.3 ± 2.2 .03 0.2 Force at peak power in the CMJ (N) 1436.4 ± 162.7 1421.4 ± 157.3 −0.9 ± 3.9 .20 0.1 1RM in the bench-press exercise (kg) 90.5 ± 7.7 93.3 ± 7.5 3.0 ± 2.4 .02 0.4 Maximal power output in the bench-press exercise (W) 750.5 ± 154.7 826.9 ± 163.7 10.5 ± 5.9 <.01 0.5 Mean power output in the bench-press exercise (W) 417.5 ± 111.7 447.4 ± 119.8 7.2 ± 4.8 .01 0.3 Maximal velocity in the bench-press exercise (m s−1) 1.28 ± 0.7 1.35 ± 0.7 5.6 ± 4.7 .03 0.1 Data are mean ± SD for 14 BJJ athletes. Caffeine and Brazilian Jiu-jitsu performance 1083 Regarding endurance muscular actions, another novelty of the present investigation is the determi- nation for the first time of the effects of caffeine in grip strength endurance, which is a key variable for several grappling sport (e.g. judo, wrestling, and BJJ) (Franchini et al., 2013; Garcia-Pallares et al., 2011; da Silva et al., 2012). Coinciding with this finding, Warren, Park, Maresca, McKibans, and Millard-Staf- ford (2010) in a meta-analysis research found that caf- feine improved muscular endurance by ∼18% in studies in which a submaximal isometric force was maintained until volitional fatigue. In addition, pre- exercise caffeine intake increased the number of rep- etitions to failure in a bench-press test set at the load of maximal power. If we only consider the first 15 rep- etitions during the endurance bench-press exercise, the ingestion of caffeine undoubtedly moved the power-repetition curve upwards (Figure 2). Thus as a practical recommendation for grappling sports in which muscle endurance is one of the most critical components of performance, especially as match dur- ation increases (Ratamess, 2011), we suggest that caf- feine can be effective to maintain muscle force and power during sustained isometric and dynamic muscle contractions. To determine whether caffeine represents a risk to the athlete’s well-being, we assessed side effects typi- cally associated with caffeine ingestion in both exper- imental trials (Abian et al., 2015; Del Coso et al., 2013). In the present investigation, the pre-compe- tition intake of caffeine did not produce significant side effects just after the combat or in the following 24 hours, at least when compared with a placebo sub- stance. The only perceived effects were increased feelings of muscle power and fatigue during the tests which reinforce the view that caffeine can be ergogenic in combat sports. In any case, these data indicate that the acute ingestion of a moderate dose of caffeine (3 mg kg−1) is harmless for BJJ athletes. In the present investigation, we did not assess the underlying mechanisms related to the benefits found on muscle performance with the caffeine intake. However, previous investigations have suggested a number of explanations for the ergogeni- city derived from caffeine administration. Several Figure 1. Maximal propulsive power against load for bench-press concentric actions with the ingestion of caffeine (3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass) or a placebo. Data are mean ± SD for 14 BJJ athletes. ∗Caffeine different from placebo at p< .05. Figure 2. Mean propulsive power during a bench-press exercise to failure test with the ingestion of caffeine (3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass) or a placebo. Data are mean ± SD for 14 BJJ athletes. ∗Caffeine different from placebo at p< .05. Table II. Prevalence of side effects reported the morning after the ingestion of 3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass or a placebo Placebo Caffeine p-Value Headache 0 7.1 .32 Abdominal/gut discomfort 7.1 14.3 .32 Muscle soreness 14.3 28.6 .56 Increased vigour/activeness 14.3 42.8 .16 Tachycardia and heart palpitations 0 0 – Insomnia 7.1 14.3 .56 Increased urine production 0 0 – Increased anxiety 0 0 – Data are frequencies for 14 BJJ athletes, expressed as percentage of positive cases. 1084 F. J. Diaz-Lara et al. investigations indicated that the increased muscle force and power production with caffeine can be related to improved central drive (e.g. enhanced motor unit recruitment (Warren et al., 2010) and better intra- and inter-muscular coordination (Del Coso et al., 2012)). It has been previously hypoth- esized that this central effect of caffeine could be related to the antagonistic effect of caffeine on adeno- sine receptors (Davis & Green, 2009). However, other local/peripheral mechanism such as enhanced calcium mobilization in the sarcoplasmic reticulum, the inhibition of phosphodiesterase or the enhanced Na+/K + pump activity (Magkos & Kavouras, 2005) could be also associated to the enhancement on muscle performance found after caffeine ingestion in the current investigation. The experimental design used in this investigation has some limitations that need to be discussed to improve the applicability of the main outcomes of this study. First, we have used a single and moderate dose of caffeine before exercise, while most BJJ com- petitions are carried out during multi-day tourna- ments with several combats per day. Thus, it is necessary to investigate whether caffeine might be ergogenic when ingested in during various compe- tition days. Besides, it is needed to determine whether caffeine has no drawbacks when ingested during consecutive days in a BJJ competition. Second, we have used several BJJ-specific tests to assess the effects of caffeine on muscular perform- ance of elite BJJ. However, it is necessary to deter- mine whether the improvements of muscle performance found in these sport-specific tests can be translated to enhanced performance during a real or simulated BJJ competition. In summary, the ingestion of 3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass enhanced several variables related to muscular performance in elite BJJ athletes, while there were nopernicious side effects with this dosage. Thus, it can be concluded that caffeine might be an ergogenic nutritional supplement to improve dynamic and isometric force, muscle power, and endurance strength in elite BJJ athletes. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the participants for their contribution to the study. In addition, they thank the Spanish High Council for Sport for its invaluable help for the purposes of this investigation. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. References Abian, P., Del Coso, J., Salinero, J. J., Gallo-Salazar, C., Areces, F., Ruiz-Vicente, D.,…Abian-Vicen, J. (2015). The ingestion of a caffeinated energy drink improves jump performance and activity patterns in elite badminton players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(10), 1042–1050. Aedma, M., Timpmann, S., & Oopik, V. (2013). Effect of caffeine on upper-body anaerobic performance in wrestlers in simulated competition-day conditions. International Journal of Sports Nutrition Exercise Metabolism, 23(6), 601–609. Astorino, T. A., Rohmann, R. L., & Firth, K. (2008). Effect of caf- feine ingestion on one-repetition maximum muscular strength. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 102(2), 127–132. Bazzucchi, I., Felici, F., Montini, M., Figura, F., & Sacchetti, M. (2011). Caffeine improves neuromuscular function during maximal dynamic exercise. Muscle and Nerve, 43(6), 839–844. Brown, L. E., & Weir, J. P. (2001). Asep procedures recommen- dation I: Accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. JEP Online, 4, 1–21. Carter, J. (1982). Body composition of Montreal Olympic athletes. In J. Carter (Ed.), Physical structure of Olympic athletes, part I: Montreal Olympic games anthropological project (pp. 107–116). Basel: Karger. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Davis, J. K., & Green, J. M. (2009). Caffeine and anaerobic per- formance: Ergogenic value and mechanisms of action. Sports Medicine, 39(10), 813–832. Del Coso, J., Munoz, G., & Munoz-Guerra, J. (2011). Prevalence of caffeine use in elite athletes following its removal from the World Anti-Doping Agency list of banned substances. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 36(4), 555–561. Del Coso, J., Perez-Lopez, A., Abian-Vicen, J., Salinero, J. J., Lara, B., & Valades, D. (2014). Enhancing physical performance in male volleyball players with a caffeine-containing energy drink. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9(6), 1013–1018. Del Coso, J., Ramirez, J. A., Munoz, G., Portillo, J., Gonzalez- Millan, C., Munoz, V.,…Muñoz-Guerra, J. (2013). Caffeine- containing energy drink improves physical performance of elite rugby players during a simulated match. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 38(4), 368–374. Del Coso, J., Salinero, J. J., Gonzalez-Millan, C., Abian-Vicen, J., & Perez-Gonzalez, B. (2012). Dose response effects of a caf- feine-containing energy drink on muscle performance: A repeated measures design. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 9, 21. Diaz-Lara, F. J., García, J. M. G., Monteiro, L. F., & Abian-Vicen, J. (2014). Body composition, isometric hand grip and explosive strength leg – similarities and differences between novices and experts in an international competition of Brazilian jiu jitsu. Arch Budo, 10, 211–217. Duncan,M. J., Stanley,M., Parkhouse, N., Cook, K., & Smith,M. (2013). Acute caffeine ingestion enhances strength performance and reduces perceived exertion and muscle pain perception during resistance exercise. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(4), 392–399. Eckerson, J. M., Bull, A. J., Baechle, T. R., Fischer, C. A., O’Brien, D. C., Moore, G. A.,… Pulverenti,T. S. (2013). Acute ingestion of sugar-free red bull energy drink has no effect on upper body strength and muscular endurance in resist- ance trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(8), 2248–2254. Espana-Romero, V., Ortega, F. B., Vicente-Rodriguez, G., Artero, E. G., Rey, J. P., & Ruiz, J. R. (2010). Elbow position affects handgrip strength in adolescents: Validity and reliability of Caffeine and Brazilian Jiu-jitsu performance 1085 Jamar, DynEx, and TKK dynamometers. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(1), 272–277. Forbes, S. C., Candow, D. G., Little, J. P., Magnus, C., & Chilibeck, P. D. (2007). Effect of Red Bull energy drink on repeated Wingate cycle performance and bench-press muscle endurance. International Journal of Sports Nutrition Exercise Metabolism, 17(5), 433–444. Franchini, E., Artioli, G., & Brito, C. J. (2013). Judo combat: Time-motion analysis and physiology. International Journal of Perform Analysis Sport, 13(3), 624–641 (618). Ganio, M. S., Klau, J. F., Casa, D. J., Armstrong, L. E., &Maresh, C. M. (2009). Effect of caffeine on sport-specific endurance performance: A systematic review. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(1), 315–324. Garcia-Pallares, J., Lopez-Gullon, J. M., Muriel, X., Diaz, A., & Izquierdo, M. (2011). Physical fitness factors to predict male Olympic wrestling performance. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(8), 1747–1758. Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Goldstein, E., Jacobs, P. L., Whitehurst, M., Penhollow, T., & Antonio, J. (2010). Caffeine enhances upper body strength in resistance-trained women. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 7, 18. Lopes-Silva, J. P., Felippe, L. J., Silva-Cavalcante,M. D., Bertuzzi, R., & Lima-Silva, A. E. (2014). Caffeine ingestion after rapid weight loss in judo athletes reduces perceived effort and increases plasma lactate concentration without improving per- formance. Nutrients, 6(7), 2931–2945. Magkos, F., & Kavouras, S. A. (2005). Caffeine use in sports, pharmacokinetics in man, and cellular mechanisms of action. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 45(7–8), 535–562. Marfell-Jones, M., Olds, T., Stewart, A., & Carter, L. (2006). International standards for anthropometric assessment. Potchefstroom: ISAK. Moir, G., Button, C., Glaister,M., & Stone,M.H. (2004). Influence of familiarization on the reliability of vertical jump and accelera- tion sprinting performance in physically active men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(2), 276–280. Pallares, J. G., Fernandez-Elias, V. E., Ortega, J. F., Munoz, G., Munoz-Guerra, J., & Mora-Rodriguez, R. (2013). Neuromuscular responses to incremental caffeine doses: Performance and side effects. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 45(11), 2184–2192. Ratamess, N. A. (2011). Strength and conditioning for grappling sports. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 33(6), 18–24. Ritti-Dias, R. M., Avelar, A., Salvador, E. P., & Cyrino, E. S. (2011). Influence of previous experience on resistance training on reliability of one-repetition maximum test. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(5), 1418–1422. Rocha, M. S. L. (1975). Peso ósseo do brasileiro de ambos os sexos de 17 a 25 años. Arquivos de Anatomía e Antropología, 1, 445–451. Ruiz, J. R., Espana-Romero, V., Ortega, F. B., Sjostrom, M., Castillo, M. J., & Gutierrez, A. (2006). Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 31(8), 1367–1372. Salinero, J. J., Lara, B., Abian-Vicen, J., Gonzalez-Millan, C., Areces, F., Gallo-Salazar, C.,…Del Coso, J. (2014). The use of energy drinks in sport: Perceived ergogenicity and side effects in male and female athletes. British Journal of Nutrition, 112(9), 1494–1502. Santos, V. G., Santos, V. R., Felippe, L. J., Almeida, J. W.Jr, Bertuzzi, R., Kiss, M. A.,…Lima-Silva, A. (2014). Caffeine reduces reaction time and improves performance in simulated-contest of taekwondo. Nutrients, 6(2), 637–649. da Silva, B. V., Marocolo, M., De Moura Simin, M. A., Rezende, F. N., &Mota, G. R. (2012). Reliability in kimono grip strengthtests and comparison between elite and non-elite Brazilian Jiu- Jitsu players. Archives of Budo, 8, 103–107. da Silva, B. V., Simim, M. A., Marocolo, M., Franchini, E., & da Mota, G. R. (2014). Optimal load for the peak power and maximal strength of the upper body in Brazilian Jiu-jitsu athletes. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(6), 1616–1621. Warren, G. L., Park, N. D., Maresca, R. D., McKibans, K. I., & Millard-Stafford, M. L. (2010). Effect of caffeine ingestion on muscular strength and endurance: A meta-analysis. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42(7), 1375–1387. Würch, A. (1974). La femme et le sport. Medicine Sportive Francaise, 4(1), 441–445. 1086 F. J. Diaz-Lara et al. Abstract Introduction Methods Subjects Experimental design Experimental protocol Statistical analysis Results Handgrip maximal force, CMJ and MSL tests 1RM and power-load in bench press exercise Bench-press repetitions to failure Frequency of the side effects derived from caffeine Discussion Acknowledgements Disclosure statement References
Compartilhar