Considering the hypothetical situation presented, analyze the following statement and choose the correct alternative: Jurema acted in a state of n...
Considering the hypothetical situation presented, analyze the following statement and choose the correct alternative:
Jurema acted in a state of necessity and must compensate Bento, despite the act being lawful.
a) The act was illicit, and Jurema must compensate Bento.
b) Jurema acted in a state of necessity and should not compensate Bento because the act is lawful.
c) Jurema acted in a state of necessity and must compensate Bento, despite the act being lawful.
d) Jurema and Maurício must compensate Bento because they committed illicit acts.
e) Jurema committed an illicit act and must compensate Bento, but cannot file a claim against Maurício.
Jurema acted in a state of necessity and must compensate Bento, despite the act being lawful.
a) The act was illicit, and Jurema must compensate Bento.
b) Jurema acted in a state of necessity and should not compensate Bento because the act is lawful.
c) Jurema acted in a state of necessity and must compensate Bento, despite the act being lawful.
d) Jurema and Maurício must compensate Bento because they committed illicit acts.
e) Jurema committed an illicit act and must compensate Bento, but cannot file a claim against Maurício.
Essa pergunta também está no material:
💡 1 Resposta
Ed 
A alternativa correta é a letra b) Jurema agiu em estado de necessidade e não deve compensar Bento, pois o ato é lícito.
✏️ Responder
Para escrever sua resposta aqui, entre ou crie uma conta
Outros materiais
Perguntas relacionadas
Materiais relacionados
39 pág.
Compartilhar