Considering the issue of pre-questioning, since article 105, item III, of the Federal Constitution mentions decided causes, that is, those in which...
Considering the issue of pre-questioning, since article 105, item III, of the Federal Constitution mentions decided causes, that is, those in which there is no residue of matter that can be reviewed by the hierarchically superior body; ERROR 2 - item III of article 105, CF, mentions only decisions rendered by TRFs and TJs as bodies from which an REsp can be filed, and not any courts, such as the Recursal Panels of JEC, which occurs with the extraordinary appeal, which favored the understanding observed in enunciation n. 727 of the STF1, which makes all lawyer's statements incorrect.
The lawyer's statements are all incorrect.
The Federal Constitution mentions only decided causes in article 105, item III.
Article 105, item III, mentions only decisions rendered by TRFs and TJs as bodies from which an REsp can be filed.
The lawyer's statements are all incorrect.
The Federal Constitution mentions only decided causes in article 105, item III.
Article 105, item III, mentions only decisions rendered by TRFs and TJs as bodies from which an REsp can be filed.
💡 1 Resposta
Ed 
A questão apresentada trata de uma afirmação sobre o prequestionamento, que é um requisito para a interposição de recursos especial e extraordinário. A afirmação em questão é que o artigo 105, inciso III, da Constituição Federal menciona apenas causas decididas pelos Tribunais Regionais Federais (TRFs) e Tribunais de Justiça (TJs) como órgãos dos quais um recurso especial pode ser interposto, e não quaisquer tribunais, como os Juizados Especiais Cíveis (JECs). A afirmação é verdadeira.
✏️ Responder
Para escrever sua resposta aqui, entre ou crie uma conta
Outros materiais
Perguntas relacionadas
Materiais relacionados
12 pág.
10 pág.
Compartilhar